ML20246P886
| ML20246P886 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/02/1989 |
| From: | Yuhas G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Baskin K SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246P892 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8905220302 | |
| Download: ML20246P886 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1989008
Text
_ - - . _ _ _ _ -
'
s.
7
-
a.
. . -
.
MAY 2_1989
m
'
- Docket Nos.;50-206, 50-361 and 50-362
Southern California Edison Company
'P; 0. Box'800
2244 Walnut. Grove Avenue-
Rosemead,. California 91770
Atte'ntion:
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin, Vice President
Nuclear Engineering, Safety and Licensing Department
,
,
,
4 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
NRC INSPECTION SAN ONOFRE UNITS 1, 2 AND 3-
-This letter refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. J. E. Russell of this
office,on March 13 through 23 at the San Onofre site and telephone
conversations and' document reviews through April 3, 1989, of activities
authorized by!NRC. License Nos. DPR-13, NPF-10 and NPF-15 and to'the discussion
' of our findings held :by Mr. Russell with Messrs. C. McCarthy and H. Morgan and
other members of.your staff at the conclusion of the on-site inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in-the. enclosed inspection
.,
' -
report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with
' personnel, and observations by the inspector.
Based on the:results of this inspection, it appears that one of your
activities were'not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as set
~forth in the Notice of Violation enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
The enclosed inspection report is worthy of your careful review. The report
"
describes too many examples involving inadequate control of radioactive
material.
While the NRC enforcement policy encourages licensees to identify
and correct deficiencies in their performance.we also expect these corrective
actions to be lasting and. effective.
Your performance in the radiological
controls area as described in this inspection report is not reflective of SALP
Catagory 1 performance.
Your response to this Notice is to be submitted in.accordance with the
provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosure
will,be placed in the NRC Public' Document Room.
<
The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notices are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of.1980, PL 96-511.
\\\\
8905220302 890502
ADOCK 05000206
eh
O
.
-
_ - - -
-_
.--
_ _ _ .
_.
,
..
w ,*
~
MAY
1989
-
.,
'Should you have'any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to
,
discuss them with you.
!
Sincerely.
0h
'
.
Gregory 3. Yuhas, Chi'ef'
Radiological Protection Branch
,
Enclosures:
A.
Appendix A (Notice of Violation)
B.
Inspection Report Nos. 50-206/89-08, 50-361/89-08 and 50-362/89-08
,
!-
,
cc w/ enclosures:
D. J. Fogarty, SCE
.
C. B.cMcCarthy, SCE (San Clemente)
H. E. Morgan, SCE (San Clemente)
State of'CA
y
bec w/ enclosures:
RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIOS) (IE06)
< Project Inspector
Resident Inspector
G. Cook
B. Faulkenberry
J. Martin
Docket File
bec w/o enclosure B:
LFMB
M. Smith
REGION V/ dot
fgy,f
6k
,
JRussell
EGarcTa
AJohnson
GYuha-
5
9
5/ 2 /89
5/uf//89
5/ y 89
QEST COPY ] RJQUEST COPY ] REQUESTgePK J REQtyST COPY ]
f
_
ES/ / NO
](iES) / NO
] YES //(N0 /1 YES V NO
]
_-
v
D TO PDR ]
9YES./ NO
]
1
i
!
.
. .
.