ML20246C081

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Request for Addl Info Re New Switchgear Room at Plant,Per 890228 Meeting W/Nrc.Response Requested within 60 Days of Receipt of Ltr
ML20246C081
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 05/01/1989
From: Wang A
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Mroczka E
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO.
References
TAC-65034, NUDOCS 8905090256
Download: ML20246C081 (4)


Text

'

!!ay 1, 1989 Docket No. 50-213 DISTRIBUTION 9DocketEUee Mr. Edward J. Mroczka, Senior Vice President NRC"" Local PDRs a

Nuclear Engineering and Operations Plant File EJordan Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company SVarga BGrimes P. O. Box 270 BBoger ACRS(10)

Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 SNorris FRosa AWang JEKnight

Dear Mr. Mroczka:

OGC AToalston

SUBJECT:

HADDAM NECK - NEW SWITCHGEAR ROOM - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC #65034)

On February 28, 1989, the staff with Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPCO) to discuss the new switchgear room at the Haddam Neck site. At this time your staff provided several Plant Design Change Records (PDCRs) to c

describe the changes and additions being made as a result of the new l

switchgear room. Based on our review of your PDCRs, the NRC has determined that additional information is needed to complete our review.

Please respond-within 60 days of the receipt of this letter.

We believe this response time is necessary to support your start-up from CYCLE 16.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than 10 respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not rec;uired under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely,

/s/

Alan B. Wang, Project Manager Project Directorate I-4 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: See next page

[ TAC 65034) pol

'j l LA:PDI-4 PM:PDI-4 P.

4

{SNorris OM'[

AWang:cb W JS 4/19/89 J/ l /89 ft///89 8905090256 890501 POR ADOCK 05000213 P

FDC

q r,

I Mr. Edward J. Mroczka Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Haddam Neck Plant cc:

Gerald Garfield, Esquire R. M. Kacich, Manager Day, Berry and Howard Generation Facilities Licensing Counselors at Law Northeast Utilities Service Company City Place Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06103-3499 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 W. D. Romberg, Vice President D. O. Nordquist Nuclear Operations Director of Quality Services Northeast Utilities Service Company Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Post Office Box 270 Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Kevin McCarthy, Director

' Regional Administrator Radiation Control Unit Region I Department of Environmental Protection U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State Office Building 475 Allendale Road Hartford, Connecticut 06106 King of Prussia, Pennsylvania ' 19406 Bradford S. Chase, Under Secretary Board of Selectmen Energy Division Town Hall Office of Policy and Manegement Haddam, Connecticut 06103 80 Washington Street Hartford, Connecticut 06106 J. T. Shedlosky, Resident Inspector Haddam Neck Plant D. B. Miller, Station Superintendent c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Haddam Neck Plant Post Office Box 116 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company East Haddam Post Office RfD 1, Post Office Box 127E East Haddam, Connecticut 06423 East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 G. H. Bouchard, Unit Superintendent Haddam Neck Plant RFD #1 Post Office Box 127E East Hampton, Connecticut 06424

ENCLOSURE:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HADDAM NECK PLANT NEW SWITCHGEAR PROJECT 1.

PDCR No. 910, Rev. O page 22 states that BA-MOV-373 control circuitry has been modified to incorporate contacts from the ARTP.

No similar statement is made for valves SI-MOV-901, SI-MOV-903 and SI-MOV-854A.

Will the control circuitry for these valves also be isolated from the main control room by the ARTP? Do the remaining loads supplied from MCC 12-11 have any indication or contro', features other than the molded case circuit breakers?

2.

PDCR No. 902 gives no details regarding the remote instrumentation panel.

Is the discussion presented on page TR-17 and Sketch IV-2 of your December 8, 1987 Progress Report No. 7 still applicable?

If not, please indicate any significant changes that have occurred since then.

3.

Describe how the power supply for speed control of the charging metering pump P-11-1A, and for the control of valve CH-A0V-278 from the new switchgear room is protected against a fire in the control room.

Are separate breakers / fuses used from the 120/208 distribution panel to the control room and to the new switchgear room?

w 4.

Provide the load profiles for Batteries 1A and IB for the worst case loading condition and confirm that the batteries are adequately sized in accordance with IEEE Standard 485.

5.

Describe how the non-Class 1E instrumentation at the remote instrument panel in the new switchgear room is electrically isolated from the Class IE Vital-ac power supply. Describe the separation between trains C and D of the instrumentation circuitry.

p Mr. Edward J. Mroczka Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company Haddam Neck Plant l

cc:

Gerald Garfield, Esquire R. M. Kacich, Manager Day, Berry and Howard Generation Facilities Licensing Counselors at Law Northeast Utilities Service Company City Place Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06103-3499 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 W. D. Romberg, Vice President D. O. Nordquist Nuclear Operations Director of Quality Services Northeast Utilities Service Company Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Post Office Box 270 Post Office Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270 Kevin McCarthy, Director Regional Administrator Radiation Control Unit Region I i

Department of Environmental Protection U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State Office Building 475 Allendale Road Hartford, Connecticut 06106 King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Bradford S. Chase, Under Secretary Board of Selectmen Energy Division Town Hall Office of Policy and Management Haddam, Connecticut 06103 80 Washington Street Hartford, Connecticut 06106 J. T. Shedlosky, Resident Inspector Haddam Neck Plant D. B. Miller, Station Superintendent c/o U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Haddam Neck Plant Post Office Box 116 Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company East Haddam Post Office RFD 1, Post Office Box 127E East Haddam, Connecticut 06423 East Hampton, Connecticut 06424 G. H. Bouchard, Unit Superintendent Haddam Neck Plant RFD #1 Post Office Box 127E East Hampton, Connecticut 06424

. ENCLOSURE 4

1 :

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HADDAM NECK PLANT NEW SWITCHGEAR PROJECT j

1.

PDCR No. 910, Rev. O page 22. states that BA-MOV-373 control circuitry has been modified to incorporate contacts from the ARTP. No similar statement it made for valves'SI-MOV-901, SI-M0V-903 and SI-MOV-854A.

Will the control circuitry for these valves also be isolated from the main control room by the ARTP? Do the remaining loads supplied from MCC 12-11 have any indication or control features other than the molded case circuit breakers?

l 2.

PDCR No. 902 gives no details'regarding the remote instrumentation panel.

1 I

Is the' discussion presented on page TR-17 and Sketch IV-2 of your December 8, 1987 Progress Report No. 7 still applicable?

If not, please indicate any significant changes that have occurred since then.

I 3.

Describe how the power supply for speed control of the charging metering pump P-11-1A, and for the control of valve CH-A0V-278 from the new switchgear room is protected against a fire in the control room. Are separate breakers / fuses used from the 120/208 distribution panel to the control room and to the new switchgear room?

l 4.

Provide the load profiles for Batteries 1A and IB for the worst case l

loading condition and confirm that the batteries are adequately sized 3

in accordance with IEEE Standard 485.

I 5.

Describe how the non-Class IE instrumentation at the remote instrument panel in the new switchgear room is electrically isolated from the Class 1E Vital ac power supply. Describe the separation between' trains l

C and D of the instrumentation circuitry.

I 2

s 6.

Discuss the circuit breaker coordination between the infeed circuit J

breakers to the 120V ac vital buses C and D and the outfeed breakers.

7.

Discuss the circuit breaker coordination between the infeed circuit breaker to the 120/208 volt distribution panel PP-U8-1 and the outfeed breakers.

8.

PDCR No. 901, p.6 states that raceway meets physical separation criteria l

except as noted in Design Input 3C.15.

Please furnish a copy of this-l design input or otherwise describe the exceptions.

9.

State whether the new cables to be installed or rerouted are identified in accordance with Paragraph 5.1.2 of IEEE 384-1974 (or Paragraph 6.1.2 of IEEE384-1981).

If not, how are they identified?

10.

Please furnish a copy of electrical design criteria 18691-E-001(Q).

11.

Please furnish a copy of NUSCO calculation PA-78-741-01-GE regarding diesel generator 2B loading.

1 12.

Please furnish a copy of Bechtel Calculations 18691-E-004,006 and 1

0013 regarding voltage drops.

13.

Please furnish a copy of Bechtel Calculations 18691-E-017 and 018 regarding circuit breaker coordination.

1 i