ML20245J200

Forwards Summary of 890725 Quarterly Performance Meeting Re Activities Authorized Under Licenses DPR-51 & NPF-6. Viewgraphs Encl

ML20245J200
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	08/08/1989
From:	Milhoan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Campbell G ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8908170565
Download: ML20245J200 (138)

Text

w i

AUS 813 1

In Reply Refer To

Dockets:.' 50-313'

'50-363-f Arkansas Power & Light Company ATTN: Mr. Gene Campbell Vice President, Nuclear-Operations

'P.O. Box 551-

>Little' Rock, Arkansas 72203:

Gentlemen:.

This refers to' the Arkansas Nuclear One.(ANO) Quarterly Performance Meeting,

. conducted at your request at the ANO site on July 25, 1989. This meeting related to activities authorized by NRC License Nos. DPR-51 and NPF-6 for ANO and was. attended by those on the attendance list (attachment to the meeting sumary). The subjects discussed at this meeting are described in the '

enclosed meeting ~ summary.

It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial and has provided for a better understanding of the organizational changes at ANO as well as the ongoing and planned major activities within the ANO departments.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this. letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, OdoinalSigned By:

L Thomas P.Gwynn James L. Milhoan, Director Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure:

1 Management Meeting Summary i.

CC:

l.:

' Arkansas Nuclear One

); >

. ATTN:

N. S. Carns, Director Nuclear Operations P.O. Box 608 Russellville, Arkansas 72801 Arkansas Radiation Co t 1 Program Direc,t r I\\

RIV:DRP/A C:bRP/A D:DRP

/

4'

!)(6 )

'ATHowell;df DDChamberlain p JLMilhoan

[

8/$/89 8/)/89 9 8/{ /89 8908170565 890008 PDR ADOCK 05000313 P

PNV J

.J.

S' c b.1 '

I

> ' Arkansas Power & Light Company.. <

perto!DMBl(IE45)i:d bec distrib. by RIV:.

RRI:

R. D. Martin, RA.

RPB-DRSS SectionChief-(DRP/A).

Lisa Shea,~RM/ALF~

RIV File

.DRP.

MIS System-Project Engineer (DRP/A).

DRS C. Harbuck. NRR Project Manager (MS:. 13-D-18).

- C. Poslusny, NRR Project Manager (MS:

13-D-18).

9

, ^j i

-)

t iw.

p L

ANO QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MEETING

SUMMARY

Licensee:. Arkansas. Power & Light Company (AP&L)

Facility: Arkansas. Nuclear One (AN0)

License Nos.: DPR-51 NPF-6 Docket Nos.: 50-313 50-368

Subject:

--QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE MEETING TO DISCUSS-AP&L'S ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES AT AND AND THE MAJOR ONGOING ACTIVITIES IN EACH OF THE ANO DEPARTMENTS On July 25, 1989, the Regional Administrator and selected members of the NRC Region IV staff met with representatives of AP&L to discuss organizational

. changes at AN0 and the major ongoing and planned activities in each of the ANO departments. A copy of the licensee presentation is attached.

Attachments:

1.- Attendance List.

.2.

Licensee Presentation (NRC distribution only)

ATTENDANCE LIST Attendance at the NRC/ Arkansas Power & Light Company Quarterly Performance

' Meeting on July 25, 1989, at the Arkansas Nuclear One site was as follows:

Arkansas Power & Light Company G. Campbell, Vice President, Nuclear Operations N. Carns Director, Nuclear Operations E. Ewing, Gencral Manager, Technical Support and Assessment G. Jones, General Manager, Engineering l

R. Fenech, Unit 2 Plant Manager J. Vandergrift, Unit 1 Plant Manager L. Humphrey, General Manager, Nuclear Quality W. Craddock, General Manager, Nuclear Support R. Edington, Unit 2 Outage Manager NRC Region IV R. Martin, Regional Administrator J. Milhoan, Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)

D. Wheeler, Acting Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety D. Chamberlain, Chief, Project Section A, DRP A. Howell, Project Engineer, Project Section A DRP l

i i

aM

.=.:

/

, g.r t

w I

"L.

1-a i

q

./ '

IP&L/NRC QUARTERLY PERFORMANCE

.~ MEETING JULY 25',1989 4

i

~

- AGENDA r

~

L I

ORGANIZATION AND GENE CAMPBELL.

INTRODUCTION OF VICE PRESIDENT -

NEW-MANAGERS NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, NEIL CARNS MAJOR ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR -

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS UNIT 2 STATUS ROBERT'FENECH-UNIT 2 PLANT MANAGER UNIT 2 OUTAGE RANDY EDINGTON SCHEDULE UNIT 2 MANAGER, OUTAGES UNIT 1 STATUS JIMMY VANDERGRIFT i

UNIT 1 PLANT

)

MANAGER ENGINEERING, GEORGE JONES MAJOR ACTIVITIES GENERAL MANAGER,~

ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND EARLY EWING ASSESSMENT, MAJOR GENERAL MANAGER, ACTIVITIES TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND ASSESSMENT NUCLEAR QUALITY, LARRY HUMPHREY MAJOR ACTIVITIES GENERAL' MANAGER, NUCLEAR QUALITY NUCLEAR SUPPORT, WILLIAM CRADDOCK MAJOR ACTIVITIES GENERAL MANAGER, NUCLEAR SUPPORT l

I

j 1

(

i 1

ORGANIZATION

~

)

~

l i

i

\\

i 9

GENE CAMPBELL VICE PRESIDENT - NUCLEAR l

.~

L AL y

05 UA 0

53 NO

_11 9

O 33 00

'8 7 NG 4

~

S A

R OT A

C L

9 11 I

D AU8 4

48

/

UR

,21 9

O 35 00 37 N

TH 3 0

1

~

CT/

I A

6 E

~

C NA N

N M

12 O

O 12 12 12 I

I R

T OO T

T OO OO OO A

A I

O N

NN T

T NN NN NN U

AA S

S AA AA AA FRE P

TS S

Y NA E

T D

OEF S

CM S G

I L

E NS E

R E

T L P I

/

EM B

O R

YN S

L A

T T

U TE SU I

E C

C S

ED EQ A L

L T

S A

I A

O F C ME E H Y V

I S

A E

EE P

A C TR CS A

I L

RL Y X S A Y

I OB H

DE F

E D

L F

D.

T Y

EW O

E O

E T N

S R

B N A

D M

D E N E E

N L

O RI R E T NF L

I O

T N S A E T T T I

A E RA A A )S V

A AMC LA S

B C

LAI T OI U T EU LS C

I PRI D

S MTT P

U I

D H

D C

N USC WR N O UNC NO Q

NCR A

L NEA U T (E E

I I

1j

. t q

cv 1

1 9j. _

~

kI_

j i

~

nTu i

ic

,7: ',~

~

o a

)

.g s

~

2

~r N

1. 3; 3

am 1

s; M

k gja gj kg,{

=

N Q ~o

.A H-Z4

<N f!

5.! a

)+$

^

l

1. j!

8$

g N-

.i El MZ O<

CO Z%

i! 1 0

8,&

CDDo

~

E

1. a s

N a

4

.b I$

a cr bx

s N

TN rg#t E

M "" P r

o I

M n"P e

T c

G R

A g

n r

PN gi g-9 r

M2 e

t

.e t

i E O gi n

nn g

aU l

n P

DI

. E T

RA sp r

.s r rO gl A Z e a o

a e

t r Mr rPl ca t t I

c ee n n E

e u rl c

ic a e L N l C iN Du P

V N

CA U G t trn r o e r

N R Mpm M1 g p g

u s O

t s

t i

nS e nn e

s G hs aU T

l cA P

eT&

N E

y rti R

Ma gl u

R nQ eGcu U

N C

0 l

ORGANIZATION STATUS 34 OF 36 KEY POSITIONS FILLED REASSIGNMENTS OF INTERNAL PERSONNEL KEY OUTSIDE HIRES:

(SYSTEM / INDUSTRY)

DIRECTOR NUCLEAR OPERATIONS (N. CARNS)

)

UNIT 2 PLANT MANAGER (R. FENECH)

PLANT MANAGER CENTRAL (A. SESSOMS)

CENTRAL SUPPORT MANAGER (J. MUELLER)

UNIT OUTAGE MANAGER l

(D. JOHANNES)

PLANT ASSESSMENT MANAGER i

(K. WIRE)

)

LICENSING MANAGER I

(IN PROGRESS)

PROGRESSING ON SCHEDULE u__-__--_-__-_------

r,

,f*'

s

~

• v ORGANIZATIONAL RESTRUCTURING

,m

• IMPLEMENTED IN JUNE 1989 1

~

• OBJECTIVES REDUCE LAYERS OF MANAGEMENT &

EMPHASIZE COMMUNICATION DEDICATE RESOURCES TO EACH UNIT INCREASE FOCUS ON DAILY ACTIVITIES ENHANCE SUPPORT. ROLES:

ENGINEERING, ASSESSMENT,

'~

ADMINISTRATIVE INTRODUCE NEW TALENT PREPARE FOR MSU (ENTERGY)

CONSOLIDATION PROVIDE LONG RANGE PLANNING l

i i

i

g 4

'i NEAR TERM ACTIVITIES IUGUST 8:

NRC REGION IV LICENSEN MEETING AUGUST 9:

NRC COMMISSIONER CURTISS TO VISIT ANO

' AUGUST 15:

INPO CASUALTY DRILL'

]

AUGUST 21-SEPTEMBER 1:

NRC DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT SEPTEMBER 11-15:

.NRC DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT SEPTEMBER 25-29:

INPO TRAINING REACCREDITATION TEAM VISIT SEPTEMBER 27:

2R7 REFUELING OUTAGE BEGINS a

\\

SELECTED INITIATIVES

• PLANT OWNERSHIP / HOUSEKEEPING *

• PROCEDURES UPGRADE (OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE, HP, CHEMISTRY)*

• ANNUNCIATOR UPGRADE *

• MANAGEMENT OBSERVATION PROGRAM

• ZERO DEVIATION PROGRAM *

~

• INTEGRATED OUTAGE PLANNING *

• OPERATOR ~ DEGREE PROGRAM *

• ALARA AWARENESS DAY *

• UNIT IDENTITY

• CONDENSER INTEGRITY PROGRAM

• CPC UPGRADE

• BACKLOG REDUCTION

• TRANSIENT REDUCTION PROGRAM

• lTEM TO BE DISCUSSED ON THIS AGENDA

a f

'l SELECTED INITIATIVES (CONTINUED)

~

l

• SERVICE WATER SkSTEM -- INTEGRATED I

PROGRAM I

• DESIGN CONFIGURATION DOCUMENTATION

~

(DCD)* -

• PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA) 18 MONTH ENGINEERING SCHEbULE

=

• INTERNAL SSFl*

• PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT

• ISO UPDATE *

• SYSTEM ENGINEERING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT *

• DESIGN REVIEW BOARD

• CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT MATERIALS CONTROL PROJECT *

=

• lTEM TO BE DISCUSSED ON THIS AGENDA

4

=

SELECTED INITIATIVES (CONTINUED)

• ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS UPGRADE

• SECURITY UPGRADES *

• SUPERVISORY TRAINING PROGRAM

^

• INDUSTRIAL ~ SAFETY AWARENESS l

• CONDITION REPORTING SYSTEM

(& CLOSE OUTS)*

• OVERSIGHT

• HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (HPES)*

• MAINTENANCE OBSERVATION PROGRAM BY QC*

• PERFORMANCE BASED AUDITING /

SURVEILLANCE BY QA*

• PRE-JOB / POST-JOB SURVEILLANCE BY QC*

• NDE CONSOLIDATION *

• lTEM TO BE DISCUSSED ON THIS AGENDA

N SELECTED INITIATIVES.

)

(CONTINUED)

• ANO LONG RANGE PLAN *

• GOALS &' OBJECTIVES PROGRNM*

• MANAGEMENT REVIEW BOARD j

-m I

i l,

i I

• lTEM TO BE DISCUSSED ON THIS AGENDA 1

w

.e-OPERATIONS 1

i i

i i

i NEIL CARNS DIRECTOR, NUCLEAR OPERATIONS l

l

'f

't, r

i A

~

~

9s88b8-:

s

-jf.

!kkbh$$kkb Ii e

1 H994 bhsw

=

I bhs@

h G7Y101 A7v11wYnb

l

~

l

~,_g

?

l

/

N0 E

a l'

Q

-h k

q b

g D

I j

9 1

/

0

~

DN k

/

4 l

g

/

1 j

6

/

R k

/

5 3

[

d

-I l

N 1

N l

N \\

,I 2

w a

e as e

e 4

M N

O d

6 6

6 6

6 6

6 6

11W JNEGIONI

)

l i

-___-_______________-____-___U

1

[

M !

~

MSSRMSSRMESRE sSRE !

m1

=

ij.

sSRESSRMSSRE !s ig ggp i i

~

es

.in SSRMESRE !'

)

, kbbkkSbkkSbRk~!

SSRMESM

!!!!!sississai-SW3MNYW - 3MnSOdX3 NOLLY1S l

k~a 1

x i

h-!

!i hbh$bb$$Nk~!!

fll il, sk$Mb$5M l REM I ERME :

!I II I IIII!

amu -une

ee.

~

Q 3

RhhMM !

ll ikk%& !

I RRkk%& !j gg n'

RRRRRRRMMMM& !i

=

1 1RRRRRRRRRhkk%%R I 1RRRRRRRkhhM i RRRRRRRRRRkkk%& !

i, i

i l

ii

'.l l

I.

llll1111!!!!!!i81' l

1EEJ DIKnD ~ TYJ01 N011YJG

w B

4

'mu =

2 W.

en i

o g

.g'u l

4

/

Rl 0

g g+

x

_h-N

_k g1 i

-R

,a

,e

/p

/

l g

_g, amm 5

l l

t' 8

8 n

EM11WKA0 N 1

MANAGEMENT OBSERVATION

~

HOUSEKEEPING

~

l}

ESTABLISHES OWNERSHIP OF THE STATION o SMALL, SECTIONS OF THE PLANT OWNED BY AREA COORDINATOR o LARGER SECTIONS OF THE PLANT OWNED BY MANAGEMENT SPONSOR 11)

ROUTINE INSPECTIONS o AREA COORDINATORS o MANAGEMENT SPONSORS l

o UNIT PLANT MANAGERS r

111)

STATION IMPROVEMENT LIST 1

o DOCUMENTS MATERIAL DEFICIENCIES IDENTIFIED o FOCUS EFFORTS TO IMPROVE STATION CONDITION i

MANAGEMENT OBSERVATION

~

HOUSEKEEPING (CONTINUED)

IV)

EXPECTED RESULTS o THE CbNDITION OF THE PLANT WILL MAKE A POSITIVE STATEMENT ABOUT OUR COMMITMENT TO EXCELLENCE o IMPROVED RELIABILITY

+

'g,

~

1

,.. c

. HOUSEKEEPING ASSIGNMENTS

~

~

ll UNIT 2)

(TYPICAL)

J MANAGEMENT SPONSOR: N.S. CARNS

~~ AREA COORDINATOR POSITION

. 1 CRABTREE, D.K.

ENGINEER 2

FRALA, M.E.

CHEMISTRY.

~

SUPV 3

JONES, R.L.

TRAINER (SRO) 4 ANDERSON, C.G.

TECH ASST (SRO) 5 RODERICK, D.L.

SUPV NUCL PROJ CONT 6

GILLESPIE, R.D.

CHEMISTRY SUPT 7

.STROUD, M.D.

PROJECT ENGR SUPV we

-___m_

______.__-________m__.-____-_m m__

y l-og 4

^

4 1'

l MSIV ROOM l

UL 2

ccW TANKS i

i OO REACTOR

- FUEL POOL 3

ELEV l

M CHILLER,S CASK g

FJu

._o 3

6

_ yd'-

~

L 5

COMPUTER ROOM

=

7 4

UNIT 2 ELEVATION 404 FOOT

l A 30AJ TO EXCLEC3

~

n Z

OPERATIONS E

HEitTH PHYS 1CS

'R CHEMISTRY Q

RADWASTE RADIO-CHEMISTRY D

MAINTENANCE

'E ELECTRICAL SECURITY y

I&C MECHANICAL I

MODIFICATIONS A

T I

n X

• REWARDS SELF-REPORTING OF DEVIATIONS

• PROMOTES SAFETY CULTURE AND EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE

• HEALTHY COMPETITION AND PEER PRESSURE PROMOTES TEAMWORK

)

- __a

l l

J

~

ZERO DEVIATION PILOT PROGRAM AUGUST 1 THROUGH NOVEMBER 1,1989

• TEAMS BEGIN MONTH WITH 100 POINTS

• POINTS: REWARDED FOR:

- SELF-REPORTING OF DEVIATIONS

• POINTS ARE SUBTRACTED FOR I

PERSONNEL ERRORS RESULTING IN:

- VIOLATIONS

)

- SAFETY AND RADIOLOGICAL l

INFRACTIONS

- UNIT TRIPS, ETC.

• AWARDS PRESENTED TO TEAMS MAINTAINING 70 POINTS PER MONTH

• MULTIPLIERS ARE APPLIED TO EQUALLY ASSESS TEAMS REGARDLESS OF SIZE l

1

/

~'

ALARA AWARENESS DAY 1

~

JULY 25,1989

• PURPOSE:-FOCUS ATTENTION ON ALARA AND DEMONSTRATE COMMITMENT TO j

RADIOLOGICAL PRACTICES 1

• GOAL: LESS TH N 100 MREM AND NO PERSONNEL CONTAMINATION EVENT

• AUGUST ALARA AWARENESS MONTH

• REDUCE MREM BY 15% FOR AUGUST BY

~

IMPROVING WORK PLANNING AND WORK PERFORMANCE

• BUILD UP TO 2R7 ALARA GOALS

=:

• • • • m ***************

~"

H

ALARA 1

AWARENESS DAY JUL

, 2 57" A R K A N S A.8'

, NUCLE R

ONE ALARA c

TIM E e DIS T A N C E e S HIE L DIN G RADIATION EXPOSURE GOAL:

i LESS THAN 100 MILLIREMS i

m( >

o

w w

F**

a ALARA AWARENESS DAY JULY 25"

• • • • • • • • • • • ,O

~

• • 4 "I!NE' A

h r

,a TIME, DISTANCE AND l

SHIELDING REDUCE EXPOSURE o

o

!U N

DO EI I

T9 T E8 C

L/

E P1 3

8 9

JO M3 0

9 7

/

S RO2 1

8 U

PC1 TA SE T

R S

UDD N

E E O

C S 3

6 4

I S

OV 7

8 5

I RE 6

IV PR ER SE E

RG R

UNN DI O R

U EI I

D CUIS 0

6 5

E OQV 6

5 0

C REE 1

1 8

PRR 1

O R

E P

C N

N N

O O

A N

I I

T T

1A 2A E

T R

R N

T E T E I

I INP NP A

UO UO M

- s

~,

i

[

OPERATIONS DEGREE PROGRAM 1

• PROGRAM BEGAN 1987

• 6 SS/CRO ATTEND PER UNIT.EVERY-6 MONTHS

• 3 GRADUATES b

4 9

l

1

~

=

ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE LIST s.

UNIT 1 ANNUNCIATORS

'16 l

FIRE IMPAIRMENTS 0

TEMPORARY MODS 32 i

~

UNIT 2 i

ANNUNCIATORS 4

FIRE IMPAIRMENTS 1

TEMPORARY MODS 23 l

i 1

1

/

J

~

_q

(

w UNIT 2 STATUS

~

.w O

9 m

i ROBERT FENECH UNIT 2 PLANT MANAGER

a UNIT-2 OPERATING SCHEDULE DATE UNIT OPERATION 05/23/88 ON-LINE AFTER 2R6 04/18/89 TRIP; RUPTURED

~ EXTRACTION STEAM PIPING 05/07/89 ON-LINE 06/23/89 SHUTDOWN; RCS STEAM LEAK ON RX HEAD VENT FLANGE (0.9 GPM) 07/03/89 ON-LINE 09/15/89 100% POWER;.0 PPM BORON 09/27/89 87% POWER; SHUTDOWN 2R7 11/20/89 SCHEDULED ON-LINE AFTER 2R7 0 3/91 SHUTDOWN 2R8

)

i

I

"' *'i

.a

'l ys 1

\\

s

%sI l'

li gRE !

i.fj

$D8$@ Ik yI

1. 8928RE ! -:

5g

,S i MSRE !

9RMSRMERESR@

MSRMERESR@ !

Ber1 V.L W 0.LQ Y E W J 0 W E E M D N

ll

@,!l 1

5,2a 0

GN011YD10Y 10 0

J,7

,y

_l

^

1l sBMggBMg8-i s!

kNSBMNS~!!

li MBMER-i BEMbEMES-!

NSBMS-i g

a a

e a

a e

a a

e

.LNEDVEnf

~[

,.9

+.

_g 3

t, s

\\

l 8

8 8

2 8

8 4

4 Du) wo.wYJ DJDYdVD

\\

. s N

N

• I i

(

r x

N N

N i

$h

-I I

I y

/

\\

QB

/

8" E

(

-!l'

~

I x

4

=

x i

_],

to a

/

3 M

/

w N k

/

x

/

[

~g D

/

4

-s s

N N N \\

+

-8

/

/

s

/

/

[

k aaaaaae ee

'~-

nrw mrsu

.-___.-_.-_-_-_-_m.__

2_

..a.___

l

)

i.

e4

,M

=

l l

l -

1 i

l i

,f l

w,,

l

^

I l

m

-g 4

gu g

a m

'g g

I w

+

D g=

w g

Q o

y cC

_g *g

_g 3

a g

I I

I I

I 8

i G70 GH4 NOM C HYH1 WK1YKWO N

~ - - ~ ~ - ~ ~

g,..

/

9 4

d UNIT ll

~

JOB ORDER BACKLOG

'4 D

+

b READY FOR SCHEDULING 2584 IN PLANNING 1433

0-me 4

i

=

_4>

]

=

,q g

t

=

z

/

I B -l i

%lii

~

/

1 5

s

/

I a

R, g

ce

~

g 4,

4

=

g=

i l-l aaaaea:

ee evurroxanxv saxrstax 4

• 4

~~

z.

,i

/

s c

s q

l 1

0

~

Do o

o

-k I,

13 I

~

g oss -

I

-h -i

<o a

e

<<2 o

<n

-a o

d2 JC U

y o

o g

8, 3

3 R

8 2

2

(

G1NEM13W1GHI $*

• I

l 1

l

-. =.

t

'~

pie z

I l

~

y

- m a

i l. _

UI I

e 1

M4 a

I k

i 5

a e

a a

e cH012rossicon Aamrodng2 h

• 5, 1-

~

• =

/

./

.R q

w h

^

l w

hM h

at 4

j.

5

~~

g

~

l l

l 1

i i

i i

i G22YNIMYJ.H03 JEEJ KhrYaOE J0 0

m CHALLENGES TO PERFORMANCE t

e BETTER UTILIZE STRONG WORK ETHICS

• BETTER UTILIZE OPERATING KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE e IMPROVE COMMLINICATIONS AT LOWER LEVELS

• IMPROVE ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS USER FRIENDLINESS

• 2R7 REFUELING OUTAGE i

l

65 9

y ps UNIT 2 OUTAGE I

SCHEDULE 1

1 1

I I

l 1

4

)

l l

4 RANDY EDINGTON UNIT 2 MANAGER, OUTAGES I

g j

,I i gia 5f$-

I1 e I

g l

g En E-

}

- ------l-I

'g.

n 3__l g:

i-I

,=

s E..g j

~~~

d II -

I,s h

g l3 g

a-l3:

g EE l

E E___

a___

g I

l*---

is

[

s i

et a

e i

Isi

=___

g g

l iI gs i

E I

g:

{$

en 5

si l

g B

5 i

a 8

s m g-----

_=___

_g e

E !

g

!s___

g 8i i

.E

~

=

3 g

v.;.

MAJOR WORK.lTEMS

?~

/

l

1) -

ISI HYDROS 2)

STEAM GENERATORS EDDY CURRENT TESTING

~3)

STEAM GENERATORS SLUDGE LANCING 4)

LOOP 11 SERVICE --WATER (MODIFICATIONS / CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE / HYDRO) 5)

LOOP I SERVICE WATER (CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE) 6)

DEFUEL CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE 7)

REACTOR VESSEL ISI INSPECTION 8)

FUEL RECONSTITUTION / INSPECTION 9)

TURBINE MAINTENANCE / OVERHAUL

10) LLRTs

11) "B" RCP MOTOR OVERHAUL i

(

1 1

M^JOR WORK ITEMS (CONTINUED)

I

12) "C" RCP ISI ON PUMP BOWL

13) DIESEL. GENERATOR #1 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE / PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE TESTING

14) DIESEL GENERATOR #2 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE / PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE / SURVEILLANCE TESTING i

s

~

MAJOR MODIFICATIONS r

1) TOTAL MODIFICATIONS PRNSENTLY CONSIDERED (36) n

2) ~ DIVERSE. SCRAM SYSTEM: ATWS RULE:

DCP 85-2073

~

~

3) INSTALLATION OF FLEXIBLE HOSES ON RCPs SEAL CARTRIDGES: DCP 88-2008

4) RCP VlBRATION. INSTRUMENTATION:

DCP 85-2111

5) ANNUNCIATOR UPGRADE: DCP 86-2113

6) FIRE TROUBLE ANNUNCIATOR REFLASH CAPABILITY:

DCP 87-2068

7) MODS ON CdW CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES: DCP 86-21166

8) REFUELING MACHINE CABINET CHANGEOUT: DCP 87-2008

9) TURBINE LP ROTOR CHANGEOUT:

DCP 87-2008

MAJOR MODIFIC TIONS (CONTINUED)

10) VCT LEVEL TRANSMITTERS INDEPENDENT REFERENCE LEGS:.DCP 88-2088 11)

HP EXTRACTION STEAM PIPE EROSION: DCP 89-0738 12)

MOVATS TESTING

13) CPC UPGRADE J

CHALLENGES-

)

1) ISI HYDROS

2) DEFUEL CORRECTIVE MAI TENANCE

3) REACTOR' VESSEL. ISI INSPECTION 4)' RCP WORK (A> OVERHAUL "B" RCP MOTOR

181 INSPECTION "C" RCP PUMP BOWL

<C> FLEXIBLE HOSES INSTALLATION ON RCPs SEAL CARTRIDGES (DCP 88-2008)

<D> RCP VIBRATION INSTRUMENTATION (DCP 85-2111)

5) DIVERSE SCRAM SYSTEM: ATWS RULE (DCP 85-2073)

6) REFUELING MACHINE CABINET CHANGEOUT (DCP 87-2008)

CHALLENGES (CONTINUED)

~

7) TURBI.NE i_P ROTOR CHANGEOUT

~

(DCP 88-2077)

8) CONTROL ROOM DEFICIENCIES /

UPGRADES

9) CPC UPGRADE I

l

m, ~ ~ 7. ;

j

+

[

j 3

' 6,.

UNIT 1 STATUS l

l-b

~

h 4

a

+

l JIMMY VANDERGRIFT UNIT 1 PLANT MANAGER l

~

UNIT-1 OPERATING SCHEDULE DATE UNIT OPERATION 12/23/88 ON-LINE AFTER,1R8 01/20/89 TRIP; FAILURE OF AN EXCITER j

. FIELD CONDUCTOR, HPI i

BACKFLOW NOTED 03/30/89 ON-LINE; 50% POWER LIMIT 05/01/89-TRIP; MAIN TURBINE RELAY CABINET JARRED BY WORKERS 05/02/89 ON-LINE; 50% POWER LIMIT 05/16/89 SHUTDOWN TO REPAIR ~ LEAK ON REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL PROBE

. FLANGE 06/13/89 ON-LINE; 80% POWER LIMIT 07/20/89 STOPPED "D" RCP; 75% POWER LIMIT 11/27/89 SHUTDOWN 1M89 (MID-CYCLE OUTAGE)

1 l

. p&

9

,6 9

1 8

,69 1

9&

,789 1

E 9

N8 9&

6 O

9

,89 1

1 RNU A

J 1

E a&Mg9&

5 T

8 I

L

,9 N

C 0

1 U

6 U9 1 N

g9&

S 4

P

,8 O

SI 9

R N

1 A

T S

A R

NO

%a&Mg9&

T 3

A C

8 KA i

9 E

1 RR A

9&

,289 1

%Q&Mg9YA 18 i

9 1

&Mg9W 08 i

9 1

=

~

0 g

',O 1

!i = l, l

\\j l

+

v t

e e

e, w

i O

li A

%a, s4 o

=

i N

i i 9

l l

0 i.

g 4

9 M

CH011YD10Y A0

• J

3

^

a 4

' 3,9 ;../

~

~

x s

9=

ll BMMSBM@S-i

~

~

3 I

hhhhh-!

a i'

li

!@@%BM@%~!

WBME& i g

a a

e a

a e

a a

e anau

- -.,,., - - - - - - ~ - -..

.m

\\

/:-

i,

r A

19HR '

a a

a e

a a

e a

a e

(u) wozar.t wardro

I 4

e

_ _q

-1 4

_a.

./

EO

-3,l-6 q

i

_I'I_

I i

5

_g l

-I_

-3 22W LTiWEL 1

I

\\

~

l>

t M

D

~,

A

~

g5 g 3.

g<

a l

=

g.

COg w

I tr

+

2 g

a l

l I

I I

I I

8 070 GH1NOR C NYK1 WELY2nt0 N

7 _.

4

.e 8

(

UNIT I

~

JOB ORDER BACKLOG e

t 4.

t 4

READY FOR SCHEDULING 1683 IN PLANNING 934 1

I

4 ft M-

- +

=

l j

4, o

i e

1 1

(>

=

g 0

w l

l I

l -l

, l, g@

E n o

, e 2o

/

1 suo.svrannuar sonrems *

• w----------

I a

1 see a

4>

=

,4>

I o

3

~

me g

gg o

4 O

al o

/

_ a.- l a

tr D

ta o

w,

=

o eq gl,

-Q 9

o j

f o

I E

-l o

2 o

,s

\\_

g exxanasar a o

l 1

~k B

b!

3l

-i g

I

=

~I-

,4

- il g

h s,

.g 12

!)

t a

e a

a e

l GNorirotticon Avvvodns116 o U___ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _

j'

~

']

-n 4

6 br 4

g gF

~

.DW

. uinD dDW

,D

/

./

D j

R g

g.

e n

I I.

=

1

~

C/J w

4 g

M R88tlll8lllI!ltl8

!___ee_-

=

GELYNINY2N001REJ RhrYt20s JO e

.1

CHALLENGES,

~

• STRENGTHEN UNIT MANAGEMENT TEAM

• R VERSE RECENT DOWN TREND lN' KEY PARAMETERS

• ADDRESS LONG-TERM MAINTENANCE l

ACCESS CONCERNS (l.E., CLEANUP L

OF RCS AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS l

TO REDUCE RADIATION AND CONTAMINATION LEVELS)

• IMPROVE OUTAGE PERFORMANCE; PLANNING, MANAGEMENT, SCHEDULING, REWORK i

1 1

I

}

)'

-..~.,'

g l

n

+

l,,, -

=

ENGINEERING J

T A

w I

4 6

GEORGE JONES GENERAL MANAGER I

~

/

W SAFETY PEFORMANCE INDICATORS

\\

~

- DESIGN DEFICIENCIES

- FIELD CHANGE REQUEST -

- SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS/

- DESIGN CHANGE PACKAGE FAILURES REVISION

- SIGNIFICANT EVENTS

- 18 MO/6 MO SCHEDULE

- NOTICE OF VIOL.ATION PERFORMANCE

- FORCED OUTAGE RATE

- QA FINDING - TIMEUNESS i

- ANNUNCIATOR

- RADIATION EXPOSURE

- TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS

- PERSONNEL CONTAMINATIONS

- FIRE IMPALEMENTS

- INDUSTRIAL SAFETY, L.T.A.

- CONDITION REPORTS -

- OSHA RECORDABLE TIMEUNESS

- BACKLOG OF ENG. ACBON REQUESTS

- BACKLOG PLANT ENG. ACTION REQUESTS L

- FEEDBACK FROM OPERATION / MAINTENANCE MANAGERS l

.- FIELD OBSERVATION OF ACTIVITIES & DESIGN REVIEW BOARD l

- INDICATORS WHICH SHOW DEGRADING TRENDS ARE SELECTED FOR CLOSE MONITORING i

j r

4

'M

' INDICATORS i,' CONTINUED)

DESIGN DEFICIENCIES ARE APPARENTLY INCREASING s

l ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS INDICATES (1) PROGRAM DEFICIENCIES WHICH LED TO THE EVENTS WERE CORRECTED BY LATER CHANGES TO THE PROGRAM

- APPARENTLY DO NOT PRESENTLY EXIST (2) PRESENT EMPHASIS ON PROACTIVE IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION OF ISSUES IS PROVING EFFECTIVE

- INCREASE IN LERs

INDICATORS (CONTINUED)

• BACKLOG

$ - PLANT ENG. ACTION REQUEST BACKLOb l

.lS DECREASING ENG. ACTION, REQUEST BACKLOG IS INCREASING RECENT EVENT (eg. HPI BACKFLOW)-

COUPLED WITH INCREASED EMPHASIS ON THOROUGH COMPLETE-AND TIMELY RESPONSE TO OPERATIONAL ISSUES HAS SHIFTED PRIORITIES

^

INITIATIVE UNDERWAY TO REDUCE BACKLOG

=

ELIMINATE UNNECESSARY ITEMS DUPLICATION

=

ESTABLISH PRIORITY AND SCHEDULES MORE CONSISTENT WITH PLANT NEEDS

=

APPLICATIONS OF APPROPRIATE RESOURCES

i INDICATORS <' CONTINUED)

]

s

• SAFETY CONSCIOUSNESS (PERSONAL)

?-

MUST RELY ON:

(1) ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL'S RESPONSE TO FINDINGS

=

OPENNESS-CANDOR

=

RESPONSIVENESS

=

SELF CRITICAL THOROUGH ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS

=

EFFECTIVE CORRECTION ACTION PLAN

=

TIMELINESS (2) ASSESSMENT OF INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION OF THE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF ISSUES

e INDICATORS (CONTINUES) l a ROUTINE, CONSISTENT EMPHASIS BY MANAGEMENT OVER EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME INTERACTION OF MANAGEMENT WITH EMPLOYEES ESTABLISHES THE APPROACH TO SAFETY.

I

.,3 Design Document Hierarchy DesignImpa 1***'

sous,,,

Tapani hocuss Documents a

m Tm i

F 8""

TW g

other b

a

,=

i

.c Y

N N

1 I

].

AP&L RECOGNIZED THE NEED TO EVALUATE l

' THE EXISTING DESIGN CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

~

e EMPHASIS PLACED ON DESIGN BASIS /

DESIGN CONFIGURATION OPPORTUNITY FOR SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT BETTER ENGIN$ERING SUPPORT FOR OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE EASIER EVALUATION OF OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF EVENTS AND EQUIPMENT PROBLEMS EASIER OPERABILITY AND DEPORTABILITY EVALUATIONS QUICKER ACCESS TO DESIGN INFORMATION BETTER ABILITY TO PERFORM AND RESPOND TO SSFis, ETC.

l BETTER TRAINING MATERIALS AVAILABLE EASIER PROCUREMENT OF PARTS /

MATERIALS

.....................s

PFiOJECT STATUS

~

~

l:

n PHASE I - COMPLETE PRELIMINARY NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROJECT SCOPING,

=

UTILIZED SMALL GROUP OF SENIOR INDIVIDUALS I

PHASE II - COMPLETE DETAILED NEEDS ASSESSMENT.

ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE AND. BUDGET DEFINED

=

UTILIZED EXTENSIVE PERSONNEL INTERVIEW AND DOCUMENT REVIEW PHASE Ill - IN PROGRESS UPPER LEVEL DESIGN DESCRIPTION PERFORM REVIEW OF SYSTEM AND l

STRUCTURES DEVELOP DESIGN CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ~AND LOAD DATA BASE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT PROCESS UPGRADE ADDRESS SPECIFIC DESIGN DOCUMENT WEAKNESS

..m s1

p".

c g

fs s

pe i

e s

n c

o-u.

s xy p

y-l p

s s

et "g-s dl S,

c-e i

a w

i, s

iPm s

nb) n e

4. n= 8 t= "F i e

a i

Dn 1).

m o n.

s 8

i-)

e m

o I,i 1 e

er3 q

n ek

,e s

.d s

7 v

mDpu.

Ba

)

E Ae

=

eE

=o M'

a

=

o d gE e

=

D,[-

m e = Wo,,

n c

t e B

m = '* d e =

E e,tuu pym 4

m i o,

Aa e

s oW e

c r

p cI ie e I

l m

sMV F

e o'"u n

V M

hms S. e a.

A(

s. n n pt p

a h= e d

s e

so

.i Sn et(

guI' R

ce s

A M'a r n l

e P

h we s m n

e i et !

J 8 m oyD de sC'P SSP TDM 3a s

S i

dc 4a Ae y

0' o C

t R

~

8 D A

sm h

5'=

u s

d t

i n

w e.

e o

e s

e s

r W1 Sg e

t a

y S S

B n *m S gPW)D S

d t

e

• s e

s Me)

N M

m

@IS )1 BaM e

m e"'a e

8u n yO m.

OaJ A

M s"

I s

eo n d

e C

e "P P' p D

DrD n

Df D r

)

u e

IF l

D D P. C I Py=

e e

n N

I I

n8 P ei V

V M

pD (

8k=

p a M (V s*'"e a

8 e'"

y N

t wp s*'r o

mmP

(

n o

l I

r O

T e

v DDP gR D is o

e l

g v

e r

eO 'M i

D S

M e

I D

C D

[

[

A l

.N S

- O M

- - I T

E s

u, w

A T

f

,e

' f' s

e T

I e

e i

s e

v w

e e

o a

N N

t r s

c o

n e"

o s

,m

c..Rs msWu e

e

.,, e w

m s

E O

eu w

pd w "F o

=e

.,h st ed r

M

.=h s

e e)

I c

e s ).

ne 8 e

e T

wu S

i i

e'=r i e '" e,, ea vr ni v e I.

n oc e

U C

vS C RteC mr" i

n" o

ir e,r eo es e

e t

)

rF e3D Rr c o "*

c C

A il c,' P m " F' S' O r o c

e a

s I c p "% i,,, d s

ag a"D

'erms O

Bd r,,s mr y myV M

o" rS e

s T

e i r" 8 e,a oS(

rt

.s e l ht r

e

(

D C

nbe" oi ' o r e R e' f d m

o m'mts e' 8 vd d

f f

oR* D r eoe e

r s

r D s D P' pc,A ed r

N E

n e

e RPA e

e P

P 0

J 1

O sy R

S I'A P

RU D

)s C

k' G

D pM e

s) s s

o ei F

d T #'

w e,r e

I wr v.

e s

e s,e s s

n sma" s

n wet e

n s

N l

eD," W)^i at O

w x e, ( a, u

e o s

r ocA oe n si o

e n r

rswo,,,

e.

i s

e c n

n e s, '

.c n

rn e et io e,

p t

e C

n1 n e TNi8 t p is) o )1 tem si) de

,. r m.

t i)

I mn.

i ees eh(D yr.

e,m Sc3 c

c4.

s==

r r

a o I.

e

, e r

s t

e.SD peB p

eB

i. Q o

.d c

N gcB v c a *"

p

.o s

e i

t s

)

r o u

p B

D UL M e

rI G

oh oDI o,i DI n oh as8 p

oD I c

ra s o 3" sV V

= 3. sho V

, eMl eiT l

l s (V e p s p s

I enio v

e e M *"

e c e(

e a

n S

e s*

g(

= n,,,

g(

, e e

mm.eh D

e v

p m d e

e

=

ei

.ie v E

os e*

t y

m n

ocsM w B D' De

wpe, t

e a s

i t

o i e e

s er s e n

p e

owed l

D et o

I vs D

D ee c

}[

I DD

=

d

)

=

m

&y

= g

_. e s

nt

= e m

a ro a

Dst

^,,,

A gp M

s ei

=

r

)

i MP n

g b

i l

=

,e p ).

Ci i) i.

h a s ).

MM WsrV it t

o m

qh.

s b

s Dia1 e s.

n u4 i

ahs eCe3 l

.d n e r

i

,e S s

bt ei s A cA ea, a

A

)A b

me, rh a

yT ns aI e.

oI Q

t o r, TcI t

i in e

l w

E

%o,,

e s

sip (

tcto, eaV c,

f o oV r

ss nM

?co.

c e pc(

eP rt e, de(

e, DsA C-s r

d.

c c.e,

is e

v e e

i g

di oOur o

R rR an b

A

(

P

[

aM

~

~

I!

ll!l

!l!ll ll li

h 1

<,l g

s 3

r d '

r a

$E XO!lI'I

.... ili l

5 n.

^Z E

9,_

s..

U fW a

gg

___________3

>= w Z :::

E Wc R

)

3m 4

.d 3g

.___3

_; 7 80 J

c '~-

J r

~

Zw C2

-..u____

ew

=

E m

5

=

)

g y

g 5

_,_:_-___.f w-1_

e o

s Z

~

2 y

a

=

e II E m 1!

Eg sw<!

w a h

h g I

=I-s <*5 i

3. f

"] y e gg i

E t.ipc.

1 llil,i!!g],.sE i

E*t[dl!!!!i.aa E

o o

o e

a l

m

-_a,w,oco.ir,_11!!!! >

!i..,

Wii o

a o cow w y

sz ww m a e e

ha ces 5 5 5

Ems 5c555 885 5 i

O 8

w 5

5 5

y I

l

3...,.,

y s.

c g,

/

}

Inter-Relationsliips Between Design andOther Configuration Mana ement Program Elements l

Operations l

j u

l Maintenance i

Training I D=isshva 4

omma. mas l Demon P, I

D.=sa O

l Design Ucensing i

i Procurement i

ISOMETRIC DRAWING UPDATE

• INITIATED lN 1986 TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF ISOMETRIC DRAWING A SMALL CALCULATION RECONCILIATION EFFORT WAS INCLUDED

• FOCUS OF PROJECT HAS. SHIFTED TO CALCULATION RECONCILIATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE MATERIAL CONDITION OF PIPING / SUPPORT

• PROCESS INVOLVES FIELD WALKDOWNS CONSOLIDATION OF MULTIPLE ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS EVALUATION OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN AS-INSTALLED CONFIGURATION AND QUALIFYING CALCULATION

• EMPHASIS IS IN ASSURING OPERABILITY /

FUNCTIONALITY - MAY RESULT IN 50.72/

50.73 " REPORTABLE EVENTS"

J ISOMETRIC DRAWING UPDATE (CONTIN 0ED)

~ OBJECTIVE

- : CONSOLIDATED LEGIBLE, ACCURATE

)

ISOMETRIC IMPROVED MATERIAL CONDITION OF PIPING / SUPPORTS QUALIFYING CALCULATION CONSISTENT WITH AS INSTALLED CONDITION l

IMPROVED MODIFICATION /MAINT.

PROCEDURE TO MAINTAIN THE MATERIAL CONDITION OF PIPING /'

HANGERS CONSISTENT WITH THE DESIGN l

SCOPE INCLUDED SEISMIC CLASS I PIPING j

U-1 700 ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS 2000 SUPPORTS U-2 1150 ISOMETRIC DRAWINGS 2000 SUPPORTS

l SAFETY SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL INSPECTION - SSFI THE OBJECTIVES OF THESE INSPECTIONS

'ARE TO DEMONSTRATE THAT:

A SYSTEM IS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING THE SAFETY FU,NCTION REQUIRED BY ITS DESIGN BASIS.

DETERMINE ADEQUACY OF TESTING, MAINTENANCE AND TRAINING HUMAN FACTORS RELATING TO DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND DESIGN PROCEDURES MANAGEMENT CONTROLS INCLUDING l

PROCEDURES MATERIAL CONDITION

____.___.________-__._______._.___._.______________w

BENEFITS

~

• GREATER CONFIDENCE IN SYSTEM DESIGN

~AND OPERABILITY STATUS

~

• INCREASED INSIGHT INTO SYSTEMS

~

INTERACTION

• STAFF DEVELOPMENT

• MOST PROBLEMS CAN BE QUANTIFIED /

SOLVED AS IDENT!FIED

= AS-BUILT OF DESIGN CONFIGURATION DOCUMENTATION PACKAGES i

i

)

STATUS

• A COMBINED TEAM CONSISTING OF

(

NINE (9) EXPERIENCED AP&L AND CONTRACT PERSONNEL CONDUCTED A

{

SSFI, MARCH-MAY 1989. (6 WEEKS).

• INSPECTION OF THE ANO UNIT-1 DECAY HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM (DHR)

~

WAS PERFORMED.

• OVER 450 DOCUMENTS WERE REVIEWED AND NUMEROUS SYSTEM WALKDOWNS WERE PERFORMED.

52 UNRESOLVED. QUESTIONS WERE DOCUMENTED FOR EVALUATION 1

We STATUS (CONTINUED)

THE RESULT OF THE SSFI WAS THE DETERMINATION THAT THE DECAY HEAT l

REMOVAL SYSTEM IS FUNCTIONAL; BUT l

IN TWO AREAS, THE FUNCTIONALITY IS CONSIDERED MARGINAL. THESE CONCERNS ARE DOCUMENTED AND ARE BEING RESOLVED THROUGH THE CONDITION

{

REPORTING (CR) SYSTEM.

I 1

i.

SYSTEM ENGINEER

~t SYSTEM ENGINEER ASSUMES OWNERSHIP OF.HiS/HER t

~ SYSTEM'WITH THE GOAL OF IMPROV-ING THE SYSTEMS. ABILITY TO PERFORM

?

ITS SAFETY FUNCTION BY IMPROVING ITS RELIABILITY, PERFORMANCE AND MAINTAINABILITY

{

~

KNOWLEDGE OF DESIGN BASES AND OPERATING / MAINTENANCE REQUIRE-i MENTS BRIDGE THE GAP BETWEEN OPERATIONS, MAINTENANCE AND_ DESIGN

z.

~

p EXPECTATIONS 1

~

ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN:

SYSTEM MAINTENANCE (CORRECTIVE /

PREVENTIVE)

OPERATION /SUR,VEILLANCE PERFORMANCE. MONITORING / TRENDING

-, DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS,

INDUSTRY / REGULATORY ISSUES /AND u

EXPERIENCE MODIFICATION AND TESTING PROBLEM ANALYSIS AND RESOLUTION ESTABLISHMENT PRIORITIES FOR ENHANCEMENTS / MAINTENANCE OF-HIS/HER SYSTEM AGGRESSIVE AND INTRUSIVE i

f

APPROACH t

1. DEFINE PROGRAM -

ENGINEERING / MAINTENANCE /

OPERATION MANAGER INPUT

2. DEVELOP GUIDELINE DOCUMENT WITH MAINTENANCE / OPERATIONS MANAGERS INPUT -

~

DEFINE EXPECTATIONS

' COMMUNICATE THESE TO MANAGERS / ENGINEERING DEFINE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS

3. ASSIGN " RESPONSIBLE" ENGINEER TO SYSTEM AND INVOLVE HIM/HER IN PROBLEM SOLVING REINFORCING PROACTIVE IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES, AGGRESSIVE RESOLUTION OF PROBLEMS, AND INTERACTION WITH OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE

4. INITIATE TRAINING FOR INDIVIDUALS

)

i CHALLENGES

• SYSTEM ENGINEER DEVELOPMENT.-

IMPROVE SYSTEM SAEETY PERFORMANCE

• STRENGTHEN ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT TEAM INTERACTION WITH AND.IN SUPPORT OF OPERATIONS / MAINTENANCE

• CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENTS

• IMPROVE OUTAGE PERFORMANCE -

PLANNING, MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING

= SPECIFIC PROJECTS i.e. DCD, 3rd EFW PUMP, ISO UPDATE, SSFI

• WORKLOAD MANAGEMENT &

COMMUNICATION l

l l

TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND ' ASSESSMENT I

9 s

EARLY EWING GENERAL MANAGER

u n s.

J

~

1 i

q

_ ~

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

~

/,,

..e 3

~

• PERSONNEL-ERROR RATE

• REPETITIVE EQUIPMENT FAILURES i

• SKIN & CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS

• PERSONNEL EXPOSURE L

~

• VIOLATION TRENDS

• COMMITMENT PE.RFORMANCE

~

• CONDITION REPORT BACKLOG 1

s..

CONDITION REPORT BACKLOG BASTILLE DAY ATTACK BACKLOG OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS GOAL 20% REDUCTION

~

ACTUAL 13% REDUCTION j

DEVOTED RESOURCES TO CR RESOLUTION FUTURE SIMILAR EVENTS w

9 i

g

.7-7 g_

1 s/

W

~

AI 5

7 0

~

3

/

~

6

-~

5 D

1 '

E I

/

S

~

6 O

m L

3 C

1 no_

.+

I

/

5

+

2-

.5 5

1

=

I

/

5 D

0 r

,6

.+I 3 E

/

T A

4_-

w--

5_

T I

I 1

\\

/

N I

m.o 4O I

a o 1

V 3

mo i

/

3 mm_

5 N

1

/

E t

3 P

O 8

j 2

L p*

I /

A s

a um v "s

I /

2 T

5 O

T mu 1

2 C.

0 m.

.1 3

/

1 5

1

/

0 0

0 0

0 L

0 0

0 0

0 0

B 6

A 2

1 l

l,

.;lfl

S N

O I

T C

A R

R V\\

C O

E R

T E

/

A L

T

)

F A

E R

O S

F N

E O

B IT C

A R

RO C

N

^

E PO 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 8

6 4

2 1

.~,

~

s.

ASSESSMENT FUNCTIONS

• IN-HOUSE EVENTS ANALYSIS / CONDITION

~

REPORTING a' ROOT AUSE ANALYSIS

• -lNPO SOER's / SER's '/ O & MRs

~

• INDUSTRY EVENTS / VENDOR NOTICES

= SAFETY PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM / TRANSIENT REDUCTION

• OVERSIGHT CHEMISTRY HEALTH PHYSICS /RADWASTE

• HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

~

HUMAN PERFURMANC5 EVALUATION SYSTEM

^

~

• NON-PUNITIVE -

• ROOT CAUSE OF HUMAN 5RR RS

/

• TRAINED EVALUATOR / ADMINISTRATOR ASSIGNED

• INPO. REVIEW OF PROCESS IMPLEMENTATION

~

• 6 EVENTS S' ELECTED FOR REVIEW

)

EVENTS REhlEWED BY.. HPES l

• UNIT-1 OVERFILL EVENT 1-20-89 i

• UNIT-1 LOSS OF VITAL POWER 1-25-89

• UNIT-2 OVERFEED EVENT 4-18-89

• UNIT-2 POST-MAINTENANCE. TESTING EFW PUMP 4-6-89

• UNIT-1 SHOCK TO PRE' SURE SWITCH S

CAUSES TURBINE TRIP 5-1-89

• UNIT-1 UNESCORTED ENTRY IN HIGH RAD AREA 5-9-89

CURRENT MAJOR ACTIVITIES e SECURITY PERIMETER UPGRADE NEW DOUBLE FENCE AROUND PERIMETER NEW CAS/SAS CONSOLES NEW CAMERA SCHEME UPGRADED POWER SUPPLY IMPROVED DETECTION AIDS IMPROVED ACCESS CONTROL EQUIPMENT l

DEVELOP DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT FOR PERIMETER - $6.4 MILLION

• MATERIAL CONTROL PROJECT END USE EFFORT JAN. 88 OBJECTIVES:

ACCOMODATE OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT REDUCE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN l

MANAGE INVENTORY IMPROVE PARTS AVAILABILITY DEDICATE PARTS AT PURCHASE l

REDUCE COSTS DEDICATED PROJECT TEAM

_n.

4 Mt CURRENT MAJOR ACTIVITIES SUPERVISORY TRAINING

=

. FIRST LINE SUPERVISORS AND ABOVE PHASE 1 2 WEEKS LONG

~

POSITIVE COMMENTS 66 ATTENDED IN 89/6 CLASSES INTERACTION MANAGEMENT ROLE PLAY TEAM BUILDING I

9 CURRNNT MAJOR.

ACTIVITIES

• TRAINING REACCREDITATION 4 MAJOR PROGRAMS MAINTENANCE (ELEC, MECH, I&C)

HEALTH PHYSICS.(RP, DOS, RW)

TECH, STAFF CHEMISTRY, SER SUBMITTED SITE VISIT SEPT. 25-29 INPO ACCREDITING BOARD 1st QTR 90

• INPO CASUALTY DRILL AUGUST 14-18 EMPHASIZES DAMAGE CONTROL RESPONSE TEAMS CAN " WIN" i

l REALISTIC SCENARIOS

)

l MINIMAL SIMULATION BASED ON OPERATING EXPERIENCE

h 7

+

I NUCLEAR QUALITY 4

g I

e l

I l-LARRY HUMPHREY GENERAL MANAGER i

1 l

l 1

4 b=4 Vice Pres.

Nuclear r

4

+

Gen Mgr Nuclear Quality I

l GA

.GC/QE Supt.

Supt.

QA Supv.

Internal QC Supts.

g,gg, Inspection o Audits - Program o Maint./ Mods Inspections -

- Tech Spec Surv.

welding, mechanical, civil, o QA Surveillance electrical. I&C o. Observations QA Supv.

Procurement Quality Eng.Supv.

c Vendor Audits /Sure.

l I

o Receipt Inspection o Reviews - DCPs, Jos, ASME o Purchase Document Review Section XI Repair Packages, procedures o gyL o Special Reviews /

Investigations NDE Supv.

o General NDE i

1

.)

I 1

1.0 INDICATORS OF SAFETY PERFORMANCE 1.1 INSPECTION, AUDIT, OBSERVATION, AND SURVEILLANCE RESULTS 1

1 1

i 1

lM

______m g *.,

6

+ f l~

p m

b b

e

=

L 1.2 OVERDUE RESPDNSES TO FINDING 4

9

s I.2 OVERDUE RESPONSES TO FINDINGS

' OVERDUE RESPONSE HISTORY 4

4 4

ANO PLANT SITE - QA FINDINGS -

l l TOTAL # OF ITEMS l l

l l-1 l REPORT DATE-OVERDUE U

(00)

- (01)

(02) 1 (02+)

l l

6/13/88 13 9

3 1

0 l

l 7/12/88 11 4

'7 0

0 l

l. _ _10/10/88 7

2 3

0 2

l 8/16/88 14 9

3 1

1 l

l l

11/22/88 3

0 2

0 1

l l

1/30/89 2

1 2

0 0

0 l

l 2/22/89 9

1 8

1 0

0 l

l 3/29/89 14 14 0

O O

l l

l 5/08/89 9

i 4

5 0

l

~

0 l

l 5/31/89 5

2 1

3 0

1 0

l DESIGNENGINkERING-QdFINDINGS

~

• l l TOTAL # OF ITEMS l l

l l

l l REPORT DATE l OVERDUE I

(00) l (01) l (02)

(02+)

l l

6/13/88 1

0 0

0 1

0 i

0 l

l 7/12/88 1

0 l'

0-0 l

0 0

l l

8/16/88 l

1 l

1 n

0 1

0 0

l l

10/10/88 ll 3

0 0

l 3-0 l

l 11/22/88 4

1 0

l 2

1 l

l 1/30/89 0

1 0

0 0

i 0

l l

2/22/89 0

1 0

0 0

0 l

l 3/29/89 1

1 1

L 0

il 0

0 l

l l

5/08/89 I

6 1

3 1

3 1

0 1

0 l

l 5/31/89 l

2 1

0 1

2 0

1 0

l t

QC FINDING REPORTS l

l TOTAL # OF ITEMS l l

l l

l l REPORT DATE l OVERDUE I

(00) l (01)

I (02) l (02+)

l l

6/13/88 1

0 O

q 0

1 0

1 0

l l

7/12/88 1

0 0

1 0

1 0

1 0

l l

8/16/88 1

4 L

4 1

0 1

0 1

0 l

l 10/10/88 1

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 l

l 11/22/88 1

0 l

0 0

1 0

1 0

l l

1/30/89 I

3 l

1 2

1 0

1 0

l l

2/22/89 l

2 1

0 0

2 0

1 0

l l

3/29/89 l

4 1

4 L

0 0

l 0

l l

5/08/89 I

4 l

2 1

2 c

0 1

0 l

l 5/31/89 1

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 l

i

-,.m "k

4y A

e e

1 I

1.3 QUARTERLY TRENDING REPORT I

l'

~

l 1.2 A 4

TOTAL FINDINGS 1986 THRU 19891st 150 140 130 120 110 104 103 102

+

A' 100 f\\

h 90.

8[

\\

h 80 ?

y-g A

/-

(

i+

C g

70 S

\\

/\\

sf t

e ho 5/

9 50 40 30 20 10 0

86 1 86 2 86 3 86 4 8N1 BN 2 Bh 3 sh 4 8$ 1 Bf 2 B$ 3 Bb 4 89 1 CUARTERS I

I f

1

m

- - - --- -- -- q l

y' l

v 4

1.3B

~

j

+

l A

q i

l INPUT SOURCES i

3g LAST FOUR QUARTERS 40 t

l 2o - -

l !l ll0 hl!!!l_

L

,e.

4 3

PROC A F R PROC S F R CCFR NRC 1 R CAR SITE A F R SITE S F R SOURCES E 88 2nd E 88 3rd E 88 4th G 891st

1.3C d

~

ALL ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL FINDINGS - LAST FOUR CUARTERS g

.47 40 I

k-h

'35 h

30

~

20 3.

I[

1 13

/

10 -

.e f

85

/

/3M 3

3 0

i AE AP DE L

AS TA NBP NO NO PS V

ORGANIZATIONS C'.9 88 2nd E 88 3rd E 88 4th G 891st KEI AE = ANO Engineering NBP = Nuc. Bud. & Planning AP = AND Plant NO = Nuclear Oversight DE = Design Engineering NQ = Nuclear Quality L = Licensing-PS = Plant Support AS = Admin. Services V

= Vendors TA = Technical Analysis

~

_. - c 1.3D

+

u i

' DEFICIENCY CAUSES LAST FOUR QUARTRS g

72 S$$$

S0 -

42

.40 -

so -

20 -

12 3 3 "

12 OOOO 1

9

)

0 l 1 PER COMP DES PROC DOC

,CTHER E 88 2nd E 88 3rd E

4th

, E 89 tst DErlCIENCY CAUSES AS A % OF QUARTERLY TOTALS 90s 807.

70%

8 s0s -

l 505 -

0..

205 -

12 15 15 10% -

. N

?

0%

O 0 1 1 y

PDt COWP DES PROC DOC CTHER E 88 2nd E BS 3rd E

4th C 89 tot

U2 9

U 2

J J

Y Y

. 40 A 5 1 4 1

A 8

2 s

M M

'R R

R 703 220 F

P 1 8 P

2 A

A S/

R R

2 46 A 750 s

A 2 8

2 M

M R'

F B 448 S

EB 1 88 E

6 1

A F

M F

S E

N M

N3 98 T

9 N1 1 5 9

E E

8 A1 6

I 8 A 22

'J

'J T

P T

I I

O C

C 9 24 D

E -

4 445 T

E 6

I D

U D

f D

A o

U V

V 0 07 5 65 R

O A

O 2 1 5 4

N O

N R

D O

E N

T 357 N

T 2 86 B

A C

C 2 4

4 O

E O

M V

U

)

P1 62 P1 39 E1 3

A E1 1 4

)

N S

S B

L G

G 347 251 U1 2

A U

5 A

A TO

'L 3'58 L 564 8

8 T

U 5

8 U 1

8 J

J 4

N N

E E

1 s

s P

P R

R O

O F D D F D D S E EL S E EL

/ U SA

/ U SA R

OT R

OT S

S LO F

LO F S S

AI CT AI CT

~

~

l

~

h,

'(,-

~

QUALITY ASSURANCE b

~ ' 4 2.0 MAJOR PROGRAM 2.1 AUDITS RECENTLY COMPLETED / ISSUED HEALTH PHYSICS SRC REQUESTED DATE REV.

o TEAM AUDIT TEAM LEADER HP BACK-GROUND

~

TWO ENTERGY TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS (HP)

TWO OTHER AUDIT TEAM MEMBERS DIRECTLY INTERFACED WITH 47 PLANT PERSONNEL (EVALUATIONS /

INTERVIEWS)

OBSERVED >160 PEOPLE FOR CA ENTRY / EXIT FOUR RCA JOB EVALUATIONS o FINDINGS 9 AFRs,12 RECOMMENDATIONS, 6 OBSERVATIONS

e

)

o HEALTH PHYSICb ~

(CONTINUED) o CONCLUSION SINGULARLY, LOW SIGNIFICANCE CUMULATIVELY, IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED IN:

=

RWP PROGRAM

=

HP SUPV. PRESENCE / INVOLVE-MENT INSIDE RCA' o STRENGTHS NOTED AGGRESSIVE USE OF CONTAINMENTS QUALITY OF SURVEY MAPS HOUSEKEEPING (AUXILIARY BUILDINGS) 1

s men

• l

~

^

I_

~

ENVIR. MONITORING / TECH ANALYSIS JOINT AUDIT AP&L,.. SERI & LP&L

~

o TEAM 4.OF 5 MEMBERS TECHNICAL-BACK-GROUND IN AREA AUDITED TWO BLIND SAMPLES WITNESSED LAB ACTIVITIES, PROGRAM AND DOCUMENTATION o-FINDINGS 1

AFR, 2 RECOMMENDATIONS, 5 OBSERVATIONS o: CONCLUSION

~

COMMENDABLE IMPROVEMENT FROM 1988 AUDIT RESULTS CORRECTIVE ACTIONS EFFECTIVE I

r ENVIR. MONITORI G/ TECH ANALYSIS-JOINT AUDIT AP&L, SERI & LP&L (CONTINUED) o STRENGTHS l-131. SEPARATION ANALYSIS GAMMA ISOTOPE ANALYSIS OF VEGETATION LAB QC PROGRAM PERFORMANCE OF 50.59 REVIEWS CONTROL OF RECEIVED SAMPLES PHYSICAL SECURITY OF SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE OF LAND USE SURVEY INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF TEST DATA CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT

~

4 FIRE PROTECTION (CONTINUED) o STRENGTHS INSPECTIONS (COMBUSTIBLES, AND

~

FIRE EXTINGUISHERS)

CONDUCT JOF FIRE BRIGADE DRILLS UPDATING OF DRAWINGS IN FIRE PROTECTION DCP's l

~w j

J ;.

?-

+.

l i

TRAINING o TEAM 6 MEMBERS- (2 OF WHOM ROUTINELY SERVE AS INDUSTRY INPO

~

ACCREDITATION TEAM MEMBERS)

FOCUS:

1) INPO REACCREDITATION PROGRAM AREA

2) ADDITIONAL PROGRAMS o FINDINGS 7 AFRs,11' RECOMMENDATIONS, 2

OBSERVATIONS 1

o CONCLUSION l

PROGRAM CONSIDERED SATISFACTORY l

OVERALL IMPROVEMENT NEEDED:

1) IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAINING EVALUATIONS

2) OJT ADMINISTRATION /

IMPLEMENTATION

3) IMPLEMENTATION OF TASK QUALIFICATION / JOB ASSIGNMENT

r _-

e I:

b%;

w TRAINING (CONTINUED) o STRENGTH 4

TRAINING GUIDELINES

,s 9

0

I 2.2 QA SURVEILLANCE o SCOPE SUPPLEMENT AUDIT RESULTS OPS, HP, MAINT CHEM /RADCHEM/RADWASTE SECURITY 7 FIRE PROTECTION TRAINING, TEMP. MODS, M&TE HOUSEKEEPING o PROCESS AT THE SCENE OBSERVATION OF PERFORMANCE PRE-ESTABLISHED CHECKLIST REPORT ISSUED FOR EACH l

SURVEILLANCE SURVEILLANCE FINDINGS ISSUED FOR UNSAT. ITEMS o IMPLEMENTATION MONTHLY. AVG.

73 MAN-HOURS *

• BASED UPON LAST 3 MONTHS l

1 l

me k

2.2 QA SUR EILLANCES

-(CONTINUED) o JULY SCHEDULE OPS VALVE LINEUP UNIT 1

CONTROL ROOM ACTIVITIES UNIT 1

BACKSHIFT EQUIPMENT CLEARANCES UNIT 1

BACKSHIFT OPERATOR ROUNDS UNIT 2 MAINT.

ELECTRICAL PM MECHANICAL PM FIRE WATCH CONTROL BACKSHIFT HP IE NOTICE 89-47 HOT PARTICLE CONTROL PORTAL MONITOR CALIBRATION HIGH RAD DOOR CONTROL 3

i

h h

av I

( '

g L

4 k2 QA SURVEILLANCE (CONTINUED)

CHEM /RADCHEM COLD. LAB-SAMPLING _

HOT LAB QC.

SECURITY SECURITY MODIFICATIONS ACCESS CONTROL MI5C.

SOFTWARE CONTROL

n

~

~

1

' QUALITY CONTROL /

QUALITY ENGINEERING 3.0 MAJOR PROGRAMS 3.1 QC' HbLD/ WITNESS POINTS o SCOPE CORRECTIVE / PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES SPECIAL TWORK PLANS MODS DESIGN CHANGE WORK PACKAGES SPECIAL. JOB ORDERS WELDING o CRITERI SAFETY FUNCTION COMPLEXITY-STANDARDIZATION PAST PERFORMANCE l

VIABILITY OF TEST VERIFICATION

& INDIRECT MONITORING

_______-____m_

I L

I FIRE PROTECTION o TEAM l

' 4 MEMBERS

, WITNESSED FIRE DRILL, OBSERVED TRAINING, INTERVIEWED PERSONNEL AND REVIEWED DOCUMENTATION 8 SURVEILLANCE o FINDINGS 4 AFRs, 8 RECOMMENDATIONS, 2 OBSERVATIONS

- o CONCLUSION PROGRAM CONSIDERED SATISFACTORY OVERALL IMPROVEMENT NEEDED IN FIRE BRIGADE TRAINING PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND DEFINITION OF RESPONSIBILITIES

___-_____-_m____m_m.

}*

l r

L 3.1-QC HOLD / WITNESS. POINTS (CONTINUED)

. o PROCESS INSPEDTION INSTRUCTION PREPARED BY-QE-

-lNSPECTIDN. BY QCl o IMPLEMENTATION

-- MONTHLY AVG. MAN-HOURS

• PM/CM 40 MODS 30 1

WELDING 325 1

1 BASED UPON LAST THREE MONTHS l

s' 6 - ".j..~,

t

)

~

4 3.2 QC OBSERVATION PROGRAM o SCOPE

^

)

OBSERVE WORK ACTIVITIES-d PROCEDURE' ADHERENCE WORK PRACTICES RADIOLOGICAL' PRACTICES SUPERVISORYLINVOLVEMENT ATTITUDE DISPLAYED PLANNING & ' COORDINATION i

PROFESSIONALISM MATERIAL CONDITION COMMUNICATIONS HOUSEKEEPING RESOLUTION OF IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS o CRITERIA EXCELLENCE SOUND INDUSTRY PRACTICES ALARA

)

INDUSTRY SAFETY JUDGEMENT OF OBSERVER GOVERNING PROCEDURES i

b

,f' l

1 2

^

3.2 QC OBSERVATION PROGRAM (CONTINUED).

~

~

o PROCESS'-

PATTERNED AFTER INPO PROGRAM OBSERVERS TRAINED AND CRITIQUED

~

l

-- PRE-APPROVED CHECKLISTS /

{

GUIDELINES-RESULTS DISCUSSED WITH CREW /

CREW SUPV.

REPORT DISTRIBUTED TO MGT. Of OBSERVED GROUP o IMPLEMENTATION MONTHLY AVG.

90 MAN-HOURS *

• BASED ON LAST THREE MONTHS

-1 l

a

.J 1

3.3 PRE-JOB / POST JOB SURVEILLANCE

~

l

~

o SCOPE PRE-JOB BRIEFINGS DRAWING REVIEW PRIOR TO ISOLATION OF SYSTEM / COMPONENT SYSTEM / COMPONENT RESTORATION POST MAINTENANCE / POST MODS TESTING RESOLUTION OF IDENTIFIED PROBLEMS / DEFICIENCIES o CRITERIA GOVERNING PROCEDURES o PROCESS CHECKLISTS UTILIZED BY QCl ACTIVITIES SELECTED BY NQ SUPV.

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

=

PROBLEM RECURRENCE

=

CRAFT PERFORMANCE HISTORY REPORT ISSUED FOR EACH SURVEILLANCE I

I

(

,,.r 0

'..I _,

si 3...

s e

y l

,4 i

s 'd 5

3.3 ' PRE-JOB / POST JOB SURVEILLANCE' (CONTINUED)

~

o IMPLEMENTATION c ' - : MONTHLY AVG.

36 MAN-HOURS t"

Y g

}

f '

I W

i

\\

o l

i l

(

.. 3 t

,1*

3.4 NDE CONSOLIDATION o NDE SUPERVih0R 5/89

~

CENTRALIZED NDE FUNCTIOA o

o DEVELOPING " PLAN FOR ASSUMPTION OF ALL ': SITE NDE o NEAR TERM U.S. TESTING CONDUCTED CONDENSER EDDY CURRENT I

I t

g en

~'

r I

O s

y M

NUCLEAR SUPPORT k

a

$4

/

<f

.h I

BILL CRADDOCK GENERAL MANAGER

m A

~ NUCLEAR SUPPORT DEPARTMENT

\\

~

NUCLEAR INDUSTR.Y. SUPPORT (BWOG, CEOG, NUMARC, ETC.)

NUCLEAR STAFF SUPPORT NUCLEAR PLANNING'(LONG RANGE PLAN, GOALS & OBJECTIVES, PERFORMANCE INDICATO. RS)

CONTROLLER (BUDGETS, COST, PAYROLL, CONTRACTS)

~

~

• SRC SUPPORT j

1

. LONG RANGE PLAN 1

t

• NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT FIVE YEAR BUSINESS PLAN DATA INCLUDES FINANCIAL, PROGRAMS /

PROJECTS, OTHER INITIATIVES, GOALS

SUMMARY

AND REFERENdES UPDATED

~

ROUTINELY DYNAMIC a,

GOALS & OBJECTIVES PROGRAM e

DEPARTMENT GOALS & OBJECTIVES AT VP, NUCLEAR LEVEL ADDITIONAL GOALS & OBJECTIVES AT DIRECTOR / GENERAL MANAGER LEVEL INTERNAL-NUCL$AR REVIEW MONTHLY' WITH VP, NUCLEAR CORPORATE REVIEW QUARTERLY FOR SELECTED GOALS RELATED TO PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i

7 wp*

t J