ML20245H765
| ML20245H765 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000470 |
| Issue date: | 04/25/1989 |
| From: | Kenyon T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Bagchi G, Cheng C, Marsh L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| PROJECT-675A NUDOCS 8905030515 | |
| Download: ML20245H765 (5) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . -
April 25, 1989 o l L :
f Project No. 675
[
MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution FROM: Thomas J. Kenyon, Acting Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate ,
Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV V and Special Projects
SUBJECT:
SUBMITTAL 0F DESIGN CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FOR THE COMBUSTION ENGINEERING SYSTEM 80+ STANDARD DESIGN I 1
By letter dated March 30, 1989, Combustion Engineering, Inc. submitted its l application for design certification of its System 80+ standardized nuclear i pcwer plant design. Included with the application were copies of its CESSAR-DC, which is being developed as a series of amendments to CE's previous standard safety analysis report (CESSAR-F). The CESSAR-F pages have been ir.cluded in the application to be used as an approximate guide to the final design of the System 80+ design; and those pages do not represent CE's final position or I analysis for the items discussed on those pages. CE has committed to replace j all pages from CESSAR-F which are currently included in the CESSAR-DC document. J Note that only material which has been submitted previously (Amendments A through E, submitted between September 1987 and March 1989) has been inserted in the CESSAR-DC package. No new information has been submitted with this package. The next amendment is expected to be submitted in September 1989.
Part of the docketing process requires the staff to perform an acceptance review of the CESSAR DC to ensure sufficient information has been provided in sufficient detail for the staff to parform its review. The acceptance review does not require agreement with the information presented, only assurance of sufficient scope and detail. Therefore, I request you provide me input within 30 days of the date of this memo regarding the acceptability of the detail of information provided in the application.
Schedules for review of material provided in Amendments A through El (September 1987 to December 1988) have already been established. Within the next few weeks, based on input from you and your staff, I will be establishing a review schedule for the most recent amendment (E2, submitted March 15, 1989 and with the CESSAR-DC package). If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me at X21120.
o /s/
DSO Thomas J. Kenyon, Acting Project Manager
@' Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate mo Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, nu V and Special Projects 58 cc: See next page OA DISTRIBUTION: h//
$" l Central File > PDSNP R/F b
o.a NRC PDR cy TKenyon O[M ).W[I q 1 Pg @dP D:PDSNP CMiller
]l TKe on:tk/cw l 04/J/89 04/tf /89 i
_j
. o _ _
j a qouq%, UNITED STATES )
l
{ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
, G April 25, 1989 k.,.c.../ ,
Project No. 675 MEMORANDUM FOR: Distribution FROM: Thomas J. Kenyon, Acting Project Manager Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate ;
Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV I V and Special Projects
SUBJECT:
SUBMITTAL Of DESIGN CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FOR THE COMBUSTION ENGINEERING SYSTEM 80+ STANDARD DESIGN By letter dated March 30, 1989, Combustion Engineering, Inc. submitted its application for design certification of its System 80+ standardized nuclear power plant design. Included with the application were copies of its CESSAR-DC, which is being developed as a series of amendments to CE's previous standard safety analysis report (CESSAR-F). The CESSAR-F pages have been included in the application to be used as an approximate guide to the final design of the System 80+ design, and those pages do not represent CE's final position or analysis for the items discussed on those pages. CE has comitted to replace all pages from CESSAR-F which are currently included in the CESSAR-DC document.
Note that only material which has b un submitted previously (Amendments A through E, submitted between September 1987 and March 1989) has been inserted in the CESSAR-DC package. No new information has been submitted with this package. The next amendment is expected to be submitted in September 1989.
Part of the docketing process requires the staff to perform an acceptance review of the CESSAR-DC to ensure sufficient information has been provided in sufficient detail for the staff to perform its review. The acceptance review L does not require agreement with the information presented, only assurance of sufficient scope and detail. Therefore, I request you provide me input within 30 days of the date of this memo regarding the acceptability of the detail of information provided in the application. ],
SchedulesforreviewofmaterialprovidedinAmendmentsAthroughEl(September I 1987 to December 1988) have aiready been established. Within the next few weeks, based on input from you and your staff I will M establishing a review schedule for the most recent amendment (E2, submitted March 15, 1989 and with the CESSAR-DC package). If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call me at X21120.
f f =I s J. ,Keny
~ Acting Project Manager Th Standardization and Non-Power Reactor Project Directorate l Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects cc: See next page
W' '
DISTRIBUTION: C.Y. Cheng, Branch Chief Materials Engineering Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology L. Marsh, Branch Chief Mechanical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology G. Bagchi, Branch Chief Structural and Geosciences Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology C..McCracken,-Branch Chief Chemical Engineering Branch'
' Division of Engineering and Systems Technology S. Newberry, Branch Chief Instrumentation and Control System Branch
. Division of Engineering and Systems Technology F. Rosa,. Branch Chief Electrical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology J. Craig, Branch Chief Plant Systems Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology M.W. Hodges, Branch Chief Reactor Systems Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology R. Erickson, Branch Chief Safeguards Branch Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards W. Travers, Branch Chief Emergency Preparedness Branch Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Branch R. Barrett, Branch Chief Risk Applications Branch Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Branch L. Cunningham, Branch Chief Radiation Protection Branch Division.of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Branch 1
\
W- DISTRIBUTION: W. Regan, Branch Chief (Continued) Human Factors Assessment Branch Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation A.T. Gody, Branch Chief Performance and Quality Evaluation Branch Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation E. Butcher, Branch Chief Technical Specifications Branch Division of Operational Assessments
A~
cc list:
L'. Rubenstein ADR4
~C. Miller PDSNP W. Long PDSNP D. Sca11etti PDSNP L. Shao . DEST J. Norberg DEST
'J. Richardson EAD W. Hazelton EMTB M. Hum EMTB P.T. Kuo EMEB J. Rajan EMEB H. Brammer EMEB H. Shaw EMEB D. Jeng ESGB F. Rinaldi ESGB- (2 copies)
H. Ashar ESGB N. Romney ESGB F. Witt ECEB D. Notley ECEB A. Thadani SAD M. Rubin SAD J. Mauk SICB J. Stewart SICB J. Knight SELB
- 0. Chopra SELB R. Architzel SPLB J. Raval SPLB T. Collins SRXB L. Kopp SRXB B. Grimes DRIS R. Dube RSGB B. Mendelsohn RSGB F. Congel DREP R. Van Neil PEPB R. Serbu PEPB G. Kelly PRAB A. El-Bassioni PRAB j F. Skopec PRPB T. Essig PRPB J. Roe DLPQ D. Eckenrode LHFB R. Corries LHFB F. Hawkins PQEB J. Spraul PQEB C. Rossi DOAE R. Giardina OTSB 1
M. Cunningham PRAB H. Vandermolen PRAB E. Che111ah PRAB 1 i
R. Woods RES 1
G. Sege RES Y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __