ML20238B205

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents Re Plant. Forwards App C Documents.Documents Also Available in Pdr.App D Documents Completely Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5)
ML20238B205
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 08/27/1987
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
To: Williams O
JRA ASSOCIATES
Shared Package
ML20238B208 List:
References
FOIA-87-428 NUDOCS 8709010117
Download: ML20238B205 (4)


Text

U.6, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION NRc soia stoutst NUMBER se

.d,seg\\

[ih F01A-87-428 f,

r ass e sa v i g

i 1

RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF XlsiNat l !eaarit

'~

(=eee /

INFORMATION ACT (FOlA) REQUEST AUG 2 7 1997

^"

e Doca ET NuMBERi$i i# sapecaest REQUESTER o'

Ms. Ophelia G. Wjlliams PART 1.-RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED (See checked bores)

No agercy records subsect to the request have been located.

l X

    • *da't'oaa' *eency recorde subrect to the reauest have been iocated.

Agency records subject to the request that sto identAed in Appendix are already available for public inspection and copytng in the NRC Pubic Document Room, 1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC J N-Agency cocords subsect to sne request that are identified in Appendix C

are being made avadaNo for pubric inspection and copying c the NRC PuNic Document Room,1717 H Street, NW., Washington, DC, in a folder under the FOIA number and requester name.

The nonproprietary versron of the proposal (s) that you agreed to accept in a telephone conversation with a member of my staff is now bosng made avh for public inspection ard coyng at the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Street, N W, Washington, DC,in a folder under the FOIA number and requester name.

Enclosed e information on how you may obtain access to and the charges for copying records placed in the NRC Pubhc Document Room,1717 H Street. N W., Washington, DC.

Agency records subject to the request are enclosed. Any applicable charge for copes of the records provided and payment procedures are noted in the cottunents section.

Records subtect to the request have been referred to another Federal agency est for revew and direct response to you.

In vow of NRC's response to the request, no further action is being taken on appeal letter dated

~

PART ll.A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Certain information in the requested records is being withheld from pubhc declosure pursuent to the FOIA exemptions described in and for the ressors stated in Part II, ase-X taons B. C. and D. Any released portions of the documents for which only pa't of the record is being withheld are being made available for public inspection and Copying in the NRC Pubisc Document Room,1717 H Street, N W., Washington, DC, in a folder under this FOIA number and requester name.

Co... -.e.

I 1

I i

'l f

)

i 0N o pdtt$ aND RECORDS h? sal /SiNarvatDinicion.e1s Mw O 1

l 1

B709010117 870827 FOIA PDR PDR WILLIAMB7-42B

)ptC FOnM 464 Peri to l

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT RESPONSE FOIA NUMBER (Si '87-428 DATE M C p 7 9 m PART 11 B-APPLICABLE FOIA EXEMPTtCAS Rscords subject to the request that are described in the enclosed Appendices 0~

are bemg withheld in their entirety or in part under FOIA Exemptions and for the reasons set forth below pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b) and 10 CFR 9 5'ai of NRC Regulations.

1. The withheld information is properiv ciacaded pursuant to Enocutive Order 12356 (EXEMPTION 11
2. The withheld information relate
  • solely to the inte nal personnes rules and procedures of NRC. 4 EXEMPTION 2)
3. The withheld information is specific 3Uy exempted from public declosure by statute indicated'. tEXEVPTION 31 Section 141145 of the Atomic Erergy Act which prohibits the disclosure of Restricted Data or Formerty Restncted Data 612 U.S.C. 21612165).

Section 147 of the Atomic Eriergy Act which prohibits the disclosure of Unclaswfed Safeguards informaton #42 U.S.C. 2167L

4. The withheld information is a trade secret or commercial or financial information that is being withhod for the reason (s) indicated. (EXEMPTsON 4)

The information is considered to be confidential business (proprietary) informatH>n.

The information is considered to be propretary information pursuant to 10 CFR 2330id)(1).

The information was submrtted and received in confidence from a foreign source pursuant to 10 CFR 2.79n%).

X

6. The withheld information conosts of interagency or intraagency records that are not available throups decovery during' litigation. Osclosure of predecisional information would tend to inhabit the open and franit exchange of ideas essential to the deliberative process. Where records are withheld in their entirety, the facts are inextricably intertwined wrth the predecesonal informaten. There also are no reasonably segregable factuel portums because the release of the facts would permit an indirect enquery into the predecmonal process of the agency. (EXEMPTION 51
6. The withheld infomiation e exempted from public disclosure because its disclosure would result in a clearty unwarranted invason of personal privacy. tEXEMPTION 6)
7. The withheld information connets of investigatory records compiled for law enforcement purposes arts a being withheld for the reason (s) indicated. (EXEMPTION 71 Desclosure would interfere wvth an enforcement proceeding because it could reveal the scope, dhecuon. and focus of enforcement efforts, and thus could possibly allow them to take action to shield potential wrongdoing or a violation of NRC requirements from investigators. (EXEMPTION 7(AI) i Declosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy (EXEMPTION 7(C))

The information conssts of names of individuals and other information the disclosure of whch wmad reveal identities of confidential sources. IEXEMPTION 710))

PART ll.C-DENYING OFFICIALS Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 and/or 9.15 of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commisson regulations, it has been deterrnrod that the information withheed is exempt from production or declosure, and that its production sr declosure a contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for the dernal are mose offcials identified below as denying officials and the Director, Deveion of Rules and Records, Offee of Administration, for any denials that may be appealed to the Executrve Director for Operatens sEDol.

DENYING OFFICIAL TITLE / OFFICE RECORDS DENIED APPELLATE OFFICIAL Mr. Robert D. Martin Regional Administrator Region IV Appendix D X

PART ll D-APPEAL RIOffTS The denial by each denying official identified in Part ll.C may be appealed to the Appeliste Official identified in that section. Any such appeal must be in writing and must be made within 30 days of receipt of this response. Appeals must be addressed as appropriate to the Executive Oirector for Operations or to ths Secretary of the Commissaan, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that It is an " Appeal from an initial FOIA Decision."

N:C pow *se (Pere 23 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

<s am FOlA RESPONSE CONTINUATION

'I Re: F01A-87-428 APPENDIX C

' ITEM NO.

9.

5/14/75 Memorandum from Sniezek to Madsen. (2 pages)

10. 6/6/75 Letter from Madsen to Whitworth'. (1 page)
11. 6/3/75 Letter from Madsen to Whitworth. (1 page)
14. 8/4/78 Letter from Seidle to Gary. (1 page)
16. 6/30/78 Memorandum from Taylor to Seidle. (2_pages) 17.

11/2/79 Letter from Seidle to Gary.

(1 page)

18. 1/4/79 Letter from Seidle to Gary.-(1.page)
20. 2/20/79 Letter from Seidle to Gary. (5 pages)
23. 9/20/79 Memorandum from Taylor to File.

(1'page)

35. 6/13/86 Letter from Johnson to Counsil. (1 page)'

~

40. 2/27/87 Note from Spessard to Martin. (2 pages)

I

47. 2/10/87 Memorandum from Spessard to Johnson. (62 pages) 1 1

i

Re: F01A-87-428 APPENDIX D-RECORDS WITHHELD IN ENTIRETY Item No.

38. 9/4/86 Memorandum from Johnson to Spessard, subjecti Review of -

Comanche Peak Response Team' Inspection Report'50-445

/86-07; 50-446/86-05.

(125 pages). Exemption 5.

42. 8/21/86 Memorandum from Johnson:to Spessard, subject:~First-Line Supervision Review of NRC' Inspection Report 50-445/86-08; 50-446/86-06. (4 pages) Exemption 5.
43. 9/10/86 Memorandum from Johnson to Spessard.. subject: Review of-

. Comanche Peak Response Team Inspection Report.50-445

/86-14; 50-446/86-11.

(34-pages) Exemption 5.

l i

l

.m

-n

~

J/R/A J/R/A/ ASSOCIATES Regulatory Information and Support Synems 13o4 REDDITCH COURT, LARGO, MARY 1.AND 20772 (3o1) 336 4982 July 3,1987 OGW-87-072-GARL FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Mr. Donnie H. Grimsley, Director Division of Rules and Records CT REQUjST Office of Administration

[O

  • ( k N U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Ogj

.Ig/

Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST

Dear Mr. Grimsley:

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, please make available in the Public Document Room all documents described in the appendix to this letter. That information should include all attachments and enclosures from the original document (s).

Thank you for a prompt response to this request.

Feel free to call me at the number above for any further infonnation needed to assist in satisfying this request.

S erely you

=y

? '.to Op

~ia G.

illiams C-~'CCCCCCCCCCCCCC-~~:CC CCCCC CCC- -- CCC-t=

APPENDIX: INFORMATION/DOCUENTS NEEDED:

Inspection Reports and Related Correspondence for Comanche Peak, as indicated on the attached sheets. Please note: Dates and other data are as identified from Region IV files.

S705i8&20%

f,y,

COMMCilE PEAK INSPECTIONS AND REl.ATED CORRESPONDENCE:

-INSPECTION REPORT DOCUMENT DATE NRC/TU T0/FROM c73-02 /

04/10/74 NRC Howard to Whitworth

?. -

12/07/73 NRC Howard'to Davis 3

01/22/74 9,

02/20/74 NRC Howard to Thornburg g

01/28/74 NRC Howard to Whitworth 3,75-05 04/22/75 NRC Madsen.to Thornburg p,

04/22/75 NRC Madsen to Whitworth

?,

04/07/75 NRC Madsen to Whitworth p,

05/14/75 NRC

'Sniezek to Madsen 9,75-06 06/06/75 NRC Madsen to Whitworth f.

06/03/75 NRC Madsen to Whitworth 2.78-05 07/18/78 TU Gary to Seidle (TXX-2859).

g, 05/04/78 TV Gary to Seidle (TXX-2829)

M78-11 08/04/78 NRC Seidle to Gary g,

07/28/78 TV Gary to Seidle (TXX-2866) 4.

06/30/78 NRC Taylor to Seidle f,78-18 11/02/78 NRC Seidle-to Gary

'/.

01/04/79 NRC Seidle to Gary 9.78-20 02/09/79 NRC Crossman to Files p 79-03 02/20/79 NRC i

l 1

4, 79-18 /

03/07/80 NRC Crossman to Rutherford M.

09/18/79 NRC Seyfrit to Gary G.

09/20/79 NRC Taylor to Seidle 1

I f.82-25 c 03/30/83 TV Gary to Madsen (TXX-3650)

l1 4

i COMMCHE PEAK INSPECTIONS AND RELATED CORRESPONDENCE:

I INSPECTION REPORT DOCUMENT DATE' NRC/TV T0/FROM N83-24 09/01/83 NRC Westerman to Taylor E 84-08 07/30/84 NRC i

f 08/24/84 TV i

7 84-32 02/15/85 NRC -

9~

03/11/85 NRC -

12/11/85 NRC Martin to Herr 1

B 84-34

' 09/13/85 Hunnicutt to Hunter l

/-

1 85-11 05/16/86 TV 08/14/86 TU l

F 85-13 12/30/86 NRC f85-14 06/13/86 NRC Johnson to Counsil 86-02 01/22/86 NRC P 86-05 08/26/86 NRC 10/31/86 TU 86-07 09/04/86 NRC Johnson to Spessard f86-08 04/16/87 NRC Westerman to Martin

)

o 02/27/87 NRC Spessard to Martin l

f/

11/04/86 NRC Barnes to Phillips j

pg 08/21/86 NRC Johnson to Spessard l

$ 86-14 09/10/86 NRC Johnson to Spessard 06/30/86 NR'C ff[' 86-15 g

11/19/86 NRC Spessard to Johnson s

I l

i 1

l l

. _ - ___s

.. _ o

... O COMANCHE PEAK INSPECTIONS AND RELATED CORRESPONDENCE:

' INSPECTION REPORT DOCUMENT DATE NRC/TU T0/FROM

$86 11/04/86 NRC Barnes to Phillips 9 86-22 02/10/87 NRC Spessard.to Johnson

}

kEA-86-09 08/14/86 TO 1

j