ML20237J066

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proposed Minor Revs to NRC Policy Statement for Review of Agreement States Programs (51FR41172).Revs Developed Following Consultation W/Agreement States & NRC
ML20237J066
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/26/1986
From: Nussbaumer D
NRC OFFICE OF STATE PROGRAMS (OSP)
To:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20237H486 List:
References
FOIA-87-402 NUDOCS 8708170481
Download: ML20237J066 (10)
v • d • e


Text

,I

  • 't UNITED STATES

[$p **""%,k ,

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N l j, ^ l ,3 g in -,

W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 I

' # Ref: SA/J0L  :

%, k.W 2 61996  ;

...s 1

i I

ALL AGREEliEllT ANr N0fi-AGREEMEt!T STATES PROPOSED Mitt 0R REVISIONS.TO t!PC POLICY STATEMEllT FOR REVIEW CF AGREEMENT STATE PROGRANS

.I I

t;RC has published in the Federal Register for public comment proposed.  ;

l' minor revisions to the FRC Policy Statement for review of Agreement Stete prograns (51 FR.41172, enclosurc). The proposed revisions were developed following consultation with the Agreement States and NRC staff.

You are invited to comment on the proposed revision. Comments should be addressed to: .

q Rules and Procedures Branch i Division of Rules and Records  !

Office oV Administration O.S. f.'uclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C. 20555 *

[w 4? Mam Donald A. Nussbauner Assistant Director for State Agreements Program Office of State Programs

]

Enclosure:

j As stLted 1

.& I -

- -8r/ ~ 'D?

/1

^

8708170481 870812 PDR FOIA POTTERB7-402, FDR &

j.

i

41172' Federal Register / Vcl. $1,Wa. 219 / %ursd3y.WIvember 18,1986 / Mtic
s

,'l f.esset - , . . . , o,.rr.oa.e .o ,,,,osedu.i

.e .ireduco caiore and .e qui lin I ctics by ,

nome Gas and Electric Coa Kansas Because the staff has concluded the ((secep Power and Upht Co.; Kanssa thm is no sign 2cantimpact amoci d ,,, g  ;

h Ele Power Coopere#ve,inc4 . with the proposed exemption, any g g  ;

Envir ntal Assessment and Wmetive to the exem du wm e Comminion esa in reviewing l

en a

J Findt Ido Signiscentimpoet d0y,,nQ

,,,, ct. Agreement State redietion control ,

i programs.no Commission believes thei  !

neU uclearRegulatory madre Use ofAasmiose thnevisions are needed andis 3

Commissio the f%mmissio1)is requesting comments on them.ne considering anoe of a schedular * %is action does not invol the use of resources not previously ideredin Commission is also requesting comment exemption fro e requirements of ,

connection with the F en the feasibility of developing a set of l i, ! Appenda E 801 Part to to the objective perfonnance indicators for kansas Ces and c Company, Environmental Statem lated to the ,

l .' ,

various materials licensees.

P? Kansas City Power t Company. Operation of Wolf Generating 4 and Kanus Electric er Coopersuve, Station Unit 1," dated e 1982. -

eafs: Comments are due on or before  ;

lac. (the licensee), for Wolf Creek Consdaad January 12,1ss7. -

hencias andAi um===ame Written comments may be Gener.iting Station locat at the ewed the licensee,e licensee's site in Coffey Co ty, Kansas. He NRC staff submitted to the Rules and Procedures  !

he exemption was requeste by the request that su theproposed Branch, Division of Rules and Records.

licensee by letter dated March .1906. exemption.The C stas did ad OtBoe of Administration.U.S. Nuclear su;t thar ncies or persons. Regulatory r%==la=1on Washington.

bhW-t Medingof N J ~==t laspect DC 30555. Comments may also be Identification ofPreposedAction dehvered to Room 4000. Maryland ne Co uIon has determined not National Bank Building. Bethesda,

.The exemption will permit the to pre environmentalimpact licensee to defer the 1986 emergency for the proposed exemption, afaryland from 8:15 am to as00 pm state Monday through Friday. Copies of

. plan exercise for as long as two months Be pon the environmental to a time period between January l and ent,we conclude that the cuments received may be examined at ,

"the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H Febmary 28.19e7. p ed action will not have a Section IV.F.2 of to CFR Part 50. cant affect on the quality of the Street.NW., Washington. DC.

e l Appendix E requires thet the licensee b environment. - rom Pusmesa esponesavices coortact:

! exercise its emergency plan annually, or tails with respect to this action, Donald A.Nasebaumer. Office of State

. De Wolf Creek emergency plan was the vest for exemption dated Programs.U.S. Nuclear Repletory previously exercised in November 1965 arch 30. whichis avallable for Commission. Washington Em30655.

arith state and local government -

pubhc on at the Commission's Telephone:301 482-7767.

participation- Fablic _ _ at Room.1717 H Street- euertaaserrany esponesatsoet Section TLe need for this exemption has NW., Was DC. and at the 374 of the AtomicEnergy Act of1954.as arisen due to the reschedulmg of the William Allen te ubrary,Emports amended.(Act) was enacted in1959 to I Wolf Creek refueling outage trom Sp ' State University, ris, Kansas, and de a statutory means by which the 1987 to October November 1986 du o at the Washburn U ersity School of C(then the AEC) could transfer to operation at a higher than anticip d Law Ubrary, Topeka, s. the S:stes ofits regulatory capecity factor during the plant s t We edidd an&wity, manMa= for ee

. Dew Be,hs.%

.fso.a.se, t,an.fe, a e Commissin s ,e,uisimy

-unsp(*P"g p "8 a

[ Y," 0

(

ud {*

Fw the Nuclear Regulatory ion. authority is by an agreement between the Covernor of a State and the j

i g g 34. y -

Di'ocsor.EMt pro /setDirectomie 4 Commission.Dus far.28 States have i y involve tb pl anW WM agmmets) l and conduct of the refue outage, on @hnaWA. W i N 8- Befm entering into an agmment 6e

%erefore, the licensee e requested a (FR Doc.atm658 Filed 1142-ett enes NRC is required to make a finding that one time exemption to rmit the the State's radiation control program is for op to . esasse coes me. eves deferral of the 1986 e -

odequate to protect the public beslth two months.

and safety and is compatible with the '

De Needfor the posedAction Evolustionof AgreementState Commluion's program. Section 274X1)

- The proposed emption is needed to ConWroFana Proposed of the Act reguires the NRC to Statenwnt of Poucy periodically review such agreements permit the licen e to complete the eling outage on Aossect: Nuclear Regulatory and actions taken by the States under rescheduled schedule an turn the unit to power Commission. . the agreements to insure comphance operstion. ACTioet Propoud revision to general with ee provisions of secum 274 Mde statement of policy.

Environm tolimpact of the hoposed [* O*f'Ys ststement g Achon svensany:%e Nuclear Regulatory . gu!dehnes the Commission will usein  ;

The eed exempdon is schedular Commission proposes to revise its only, does notinvolve any change to general statement of policy. "Guidehnes i A3 6 . A,g A,hannas,cettromia.

the e ergency organizatiore and plan for NRC Review of Agreement State color.do.riertos c e,sia. idaho. news.Kanies.

Radiation Control Programa " December Kentucky.Imdesan* Maryland Massiasippi.

the re in piece; et Wolf Creek.

fore, the proposed exemption does 4.1981.De proposed revision to the

$ ' j ,y ' g *," fPsuiode .istend.

gjy sne c involve e significant environmental Guidelines which was prepared by the '

reus.

.- pact. .

. . NRC staff incorporate minor changes to uuh. .ad weahiseton d

, Federet Register ( Vol. St. No. Ett / %sm8ey, Nowetaber 13.1988 f Notices e1178 canulucates the pertedic voetsws mees = somments hes besa roostvedime to program element oostains 9edientersF' 274(t)of the Actalsopraetdesestes State and evaleeted. which oddress spealBc functions within NRC may terminate an agreement with Since the December 4,1get the program eleinent.One or more e State ir eber%==6salan Ands that statementwas lessed &le od of re===maded T,uldelines* en listed such termination is namesary to protect implementation has been secuessfd in under each indicator?

ens pubbe health and safety or she State helping Agreement States maintain Ibsir ne proposed policy statement i bas set aimphed with one ermese of programs in en edequate and revision spells out in somewhat greater i the 4 " of eacssonat undar competible manner.From test throup deteB NRC staff prectices in handung section NW) the Canuaineien has the 1965,los mutine reviews of State Andings of reviews, including specifying ,

authority as temporardy suspeed as programs were performed. Fall findtags when staff offerings of adequacy and l agreement ander emergency conditaana. of adequeey and compatibnfty were tib0fty may be made and options  !

Findings of adegency and offered by the staffin es cases (935). In ble to the States and to the NRC compatibility an omtrently made by abe 25 other smess,fladtags of odegasey staf when sview results preclude such NRC staff following reviews of were offeredbyto staff butnot a o!!srtegs.Se policy statement arvlalen individual Agreement State prcgresasin findtng of compatibRity(becense of out. incorporates staff practices of informlag accordance mith therun. h.,4.taet deled stlons)(tes). Withholding of the Comadsslan of the results of reviews policy statsmant.Such reviews are both fin scarrred in 30 cases (285). ofindividual Agreement State programs conducted on a frequency of12 to is la most of ese 3D ceses. State and of placing copies afNRC review months.ne results of each review are responses to sigi2Beant Category! letters to the States into the NRC pubBc discussed with a seniormanasement comments were found by NRCstaff to Da===8 Room. Cor.acudsted annual efficial, auch as the State HesIth Officar satisfactory address NRC concerns and esports of a!! Agreement State soview (or designee), and confirmed by letter. NRCataff findings of adequacy and findings in one document are ac ionger Copies af these letters are pleced in the compatibility were subsequently prepared, ha ving been discontinued in NRC Public Docenent Room.ne offered. Follow-up reviews were test .

Commissions alsoinformed of the performed on 5 occasions.In two ne statanant solanger'aotas i results ofindividual Agreement State instances, State actions to address Co== alan interest in establiabing a reviews, significant CategoryIcomunents ware snore quantitative basis for measussag De NRC staE =====t letters undertaken but subsequent NRC Abe quallay and consistency ofNRC contain as an enclosum a summary of reviews disclosed additlanalateps were reviews.No pubhc aammants were the policy statement with emphasis on still needed to fury resolve Category 3 received on this lases tollowing issusace how comments concerning Category 1 prnhimma.In these casas, the States of the last phhcyStatement. in tans, the end Category D s indinstors afect stag provided amanalresponses that NRC National Governors' Assoaistion report.

findings of edequacy and tibilig. staff found to be satisfactory,1n no came on the AgreementState propam found Staff rmdings of adegasey did any Agreement Stats *a program that "the present NRC deliams far compatibility are offend only when Perfonmanos cause NRC staf to evalas Agreement there are no significant prvbleensin secomunend to the r %==kat= thatit are monal adequate er the Cetegory I andicators. lf them are minor institute armaarHngs to maapend or proper dayee of Gemibuity in wviewlag CategoryI truncatar comments or revoke aD or part of an Agreement. State programs Ier adequacy and Cctegory D Indicator ====wa the NRC sta5 meet sankannnaDy with ' compatibuity."NRC staf of the O! Boas State is requestad to respond to our reprenantativos af the Occupational of NuclearIdeterial Safety and comments in these amas. Safety and Heahh Administention Safarguards, the OfBas of Inspection and When one or snam significant (OSHA) to review the status of the Enforcement and the Office of State problems in Category Iladicators am Aamoment State program. nis is dans Programs exsbange esasiderable found the Stata,in addition to being baeauam the OccupationalSafety and inf====ha en their respective enked to respond to any commaets la Health Act of 1870does act apply when activities.ney have est to absenes the also informed that no findings of Federal menada= and State scenaies subject of ob)nceve measures of adequacy and compa!!bility wSIbe acting moder section are of the Atomic performanna De etaff has canchuled conaldered untD a sesponse to the Energy Actof testasamended, tbst the indicators and assoaisted exercase statutory authority to prescribe soview gs' '- usedinneriewise

  • cee.ener I hd.a,4em an emne ahn duessly - a enforce standards or moulaunas Agramant Stak propans am afi.ct pubhc he.ah and anretr tea. enan anecung occupationalsadnological sufficiently ablocarve and are consistent scensi safety or frealth. with the objecoves the NRC stas esos is o, nst u .ceto.wy o i. c n.inac. arm an whue.v-u ram o a ar ere,i epree.r e u..f e me itsregionsmaterwso mg 8 * , , ,W" , , "
  • December & test policy atme==n==e has andcamp' fu=*==

$.se"dj*.

c. ,,

j,",,*,,*,,*,

, ,'g".'. . .ia. b= =usf =ry in .-eas ed =m as = shamats to est.buebwg sectrueer wt.n evainen.e and compatible Agr====at State abloctive performance Indicators to

- * - u +c. - - - ritip.*aram.en. e.r .

programs.i6e.xp.es as dai. bas assessi6e As,vemeniSiets reguietary

f5 m
:=,,,a ,2,*,,cayo,,ri, idenuri.de ei eis a a. progmas, se Cammission ins diree=d an.p.cnon incuose wti o eier ecew v ihm a e statennend that could beoeSt the star, en conjunctive with the tse mseninst sup.enom and en s== undatiris, dartfying er cabarminst Agreement States to examine the
6. a en s p.a . mi.dianand ==sier h modificaticas.
  • feasibthey of an obteetive performance

%lM'u Y,*sa Ywg" '*

  • The guideltne document contains six indicetar system for the ver(ses to reduce the becms Iwub ounaw somh major sections, eed of which deals with ca orles of materials liosaseos bendeu41.hese pres a separete program element.%ese sted by the Agnement States and h ~ m. -* - ==

i, pr,srem

  • mome.a==s .et

=~a seetions m. t.gi.i.non e.d the NRC.ne comissionbeums eos

$uN',rier;id a M~"i*he g"%" Re 1stions.Organisetion.Mena en Adeninistretion.persondel, geaient a system would provide a estional deta ould assee the sta!!to smaclues the proWen la base en everexposurve.mediCRI isntrema. Licensing.and Complismos.Eoch misstheintstration etc. and wedd be un C

,e

  • O

o-

~ crntoG/mw weMDveQue - --

minor abange to the asference es to CFR laspection backlogs constisete the m:st

' t St1tes and the NRC ere i.

their kbs.N Agreement States Part 3D was made 13 include the waste. prevalent problem in Agreement State  ;

j cad public are invited to express manif:st rule (10 CFR 30.911)as a '

eompati

.NRCstaff experience has .

their views on the hesibility of Atem. A reference to 30 that when States are asked to

. CPR Part been added tote devolip plans specificaUy for. l developing a set of objective .. guideline which bighlights c Parts addressing booklogs. including setting of ormanceindicators for materials .- of NRC regulations to State , I consees and to provide suggestions of priorities and benchmasks, progress in tions abould be essentlauy sentroRing this problem is achieved.

what would constitute suitable .- tical.

Indicators. UnderManagement and Under theIndicator. " Inspection N proposed policy statement Admin'atration,for the Indicator.

  • Preg ,"modifications have been made guideline to make clear that reviolon rmits NRC staff to extend the " Administrative Procedures." the .

laterval tween reviews to guideline has been modiBed and

  • the NRCinspection priority tem for approximately 34 months in cases when expanded to snake clearer what is being mudds b te minimum & is 'I ble I iden ed.S ce theissuanos the aggi adsen Underabe War,"Inspecuan statement, the NRC Agreement between "administreive" precocares Reporta."sevisions wm snade to the }

te program has been decentrahsed. and guidelins to more clearl essential -

uses onlied forin the

' State Agreement Representatives are et== ants the reports ab d contain.

present in NRC Regions L ll.IV and V linesin tha technicalareas of cens inspection and enicsomment. . '!Se Indicator. " Independent wbers D of the 38 Agreement States are Under _ ar nt."a new guideline i located. hse persons not oti conduct has been added that recommands Measmussents"has been stided I the periodic mviews but are in . TonArmatory Measurement." Minor uent periodic audits of State regional oSces emetect with the States in thee regions revisions have been made to the -

or otherState amoes when these guidelines,inct and the can closely monitor events are used in an addition of *aalcro-tState R meter" to tbs list desirable affecting the Agreement program in the program. A a of tState instrumentation.

States.N selective extension of e are anal or mee review intervals wul escre o er State or government staffs . GuideSeesIerNRCReviewof effective utilization o NRC resources for (usua forinspection). Agreement Stah Radation Control Agreement State program activities, Programs er"Public Information." the '

N format of theindicatore and guideline on avs04 of fUes to the gggg Caldelines has been revised to make it public has been modiB to also note easier to print.

the need for provisions to protect . Prepared b'y' Office of State Programs.

Under the Ehment.lAglSistIOn and '- proprietary of ch personal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commletion.

Regulations, for the Indicator "Ingal information from lic disclosure.,

Authority," the Washington, DC 30655.

eline addressing -

Previously the gu' only called for cases when story ardorities are . handling such information in socordance gg .

divided between State agencies has  !

been moved to Organts.ation Element

" with State administrative procedures. Section we of the Atomic Energy Act

  • Some recently enacted State "open was enacted by the Congress in 1950 to under the Indicator. "14 cation of - records" legislation havein some recognise the interests of the States in Radiation Controi Program Within State instances,consed changes to State Orgaatsation." which is more atomic energy, to clarify the respective administrative procedures that weaken
e. .

or prevent twponsibilities of State and Federal Category 11 Indicator, on of each ting t of Regulations"has been dele informati from public disclosure. As a Governments, and to provide a and susult. State radiation contrtil snecAaniam for States to enterinto the guidelines under it moved to a formalagreements with the Atomic may have difBcultyin wt eenamed Category I ladicetor. " Status Energy Commission (AEC). and later the and Compatibility of R Radividual personnel endiation expoem ations." lack records or rietary information Nuclear story Commission (NRC), i of Sndings of compatib ty have almost seleting to re tion safety when W whl neSuks assume always been caused by out.of.date State necess I to cany out their statutory regulatory authority over byproduct.  !

' ' and smaU umu6e of a cid 1 ea c prob em IEd e AgreementStates,becauseState - Technical Sta!!." the guidehne has beendiastor," Qu resourass not needed because always available, to draft revisions State were modified to make clear thatitla mchanisms by whi g j desirable that the directors of radiation escomunnes and me Stata suume adoption procedures for regulations . protection authority over agreement have become increasingly complex, and possess appropriate regulat technical grua tices. Ina is an agramut betwen ee -

because the modelS ested State Under the Indicatoe, Invol.= Govemorof a State and he R tions the Conference the guideline con 1A to Commisalon.Befm nwMg ink an of ediation Control m Directore, 1.5 per b licenses has Agreement, the Gowm-ris mquired to Inc. have not been upds in a ticaely bwn

. to make clear that this certify that the State has a regulatory fashion to reflect revisions to NRC etaff-level deline excludu . ., thatis adequate to protect the regulations. Confusion has also arisen profesel effort expended for - pu e beeltb and sefety.in addition, the over the distinctions between the two uranium mill, mill tallings and .. Commission must orm an Indicators and the differences in their radioactive waste disposal regulation. independent evalu on and make a categodes.The revf,sion combines the i Under the Indicator.* Status of finding that the State's program is s

two into a single Category I indicator, . Inspection Program." the inspection thus em o the importance of adequate from the health and safety pl guideline has been modified to j keeping tions up to date. A alsoad as inspection backlogs. .

standpoint and compatible with the Commission's regulatory program.

+

4 g -.

W .

Fed:r:1 Register / Vcl. 51, N:. 219 / Thursday, Nov;mber 13,1968 / Notices 41175 Current Guidehnas -

.o Reeponse to Actual and Alleged to cv:Id the development of problems in in 1961. the Comm!ssion published a incidents. one or more of the principal program mapr revision of the guide for review of a EnforcementPmeedures. ,, areas. L4. thou that fall under Category g g - nese indicators address pmpam vindicators. Category D indicators oY fle functions which directly relate to the L egnently can be used to indentify p aril mfoo an State e ability to protect the public underlying problerns that are causing. or cditorial cha es) These Guidehnes beakh and safety. If significant constitute Commission policy in the contributing to, difficultiu in Category I f:rn of a document entitled"Guidehnes problems exist in one or more Category I indicators. .

f:r NRC Review of Agreement State indicstot areas. then the need for It is the NRC's intenuon to use these R:distion Control Programa.* nis impmumets my be aideal categorin in de foDowing raanner. In document provides guidance for legislation and regulations together. reporting findmgs to State management.

cvaluation of o ersting Agteement State form the foundation for the entire . the NRC willindicate the category of programs base on over 20 years of each comment mada.if no significant p]eam establishing the framework for th censing and compliance propana . Category I comments an provided, this c:mbined AEC-NRC experience in

-administering the Agreement State - ne technical review oflicense . w01 indicate that the program is program. in 1985 Commission staff applications is the initial step in the adequate to protect the pubbe health initi:ted miaor u'pdating. clarifying and regulatory pmcess.%e evaluation of and safety and is compatible with the edittrial changes reflecting the apphcant quahncades, facMu, Es pmgram H one ce anon crperience gained with the 1981 policy equipment, and procedures b the significant Category I comments are ,

stst: ment.De revised document wiU be regulatory agency is essenti to assure provided, the State will be notified that '

usid by the NRC in its continuing [rotection of the public 8 rom rsdiation the program deficiencies may seriously azards associated with the proposed affect the State's ability to protect the program oy eraiusting Agreement State activities. Assuring that licensees fulfill - public health and safety and that the e duidelines" contain six sections' the commitments made in their need ofimprovement in particular each dealing with one of the essential applications and that they observe the program areas in critical.ne NRC elements of a radiation control program nquirements set forth in de teWadons would mqunt an imme&ste nspan.

(PCp) which are: legislation and is Be ONeedve d de comphance If, foDowing receipt and evaluation, the Regulations. Organization. Mana pmgram.The essential elements of an State's response appears satisfactory in end Administration. Personnel, gement adequ8te Comphance program are (1) addressing the signincant Category I Licensing, and Compliance. Each section the emduct of onsite inspections of comments the staff may offer findings cont: ins (a) a summary of the general Itcensee activites. (2) the performana of of adequacy and compatibility as significance of the program elementa,(b) ~ thes> inspections by competent staff. appropriate or defer such offering imt0 l indicators which address specific and (3) the taking of appro riste the State's actions are axamined and ,

functions within the program element, enfomement actons. Ano er nry their eHechymess connmed in a l (c) categories which denote the relative important factor is tbc ability to plan - subsequent review. lf addjuonal r 8 pond effectively to, and inportance of each indicator, and (d) information is needed to evaluate the l guidelines which delineate specific I*ee*tigste radiation incidents. State's actions, the staff may request the IC' <

cbjecdves or operational goals. Catefory //~Es sen tiol Technicol and information through follow-up Categories ofIndicatorn

%e indicators listed in this document

{ ,,

SupporL Cotegory D. COT" d Q*,* P,I*'*yg may bold a special meeting with

  • if*,*gP cov:r a wide range or program a locatica of Radiation Cutrol appropriate State representatives. No functions. both technical and Pmgram within State Organization.
  • Internal Organhuon d Radaum alsnificant items will be left unresolved administrative. it should be recognized over a prolonged period.%e that the indicators. and the guidelmes Cetml Pmgram Commission will be informed of the under each indicator, are not of eegal importance in terms of the fundamental * (^$d
  • Budget.

e,l Committees

  • results f the reviews of theindividual Agm me la e pmgrams an6 pin d gori of a radiation control program f.e- the review cormsponden tr the States
  • Laborato rt.

prot:ction of the public health and w be placedin 2e NRC Mc saf2ty. Therefore, the indicators an

  • Administ ti Pmeedures'- .

Document Room. lf the State program

. ManaIement. does not improve orif additional categorized in terms of their importance . *

  • OUice Equipment and Support t.

to the fundamental goal of protecting the -

alsnificant Ca I deficiencies have public beslth and safety.Two categories*Services' Publi c Information. -

  • developed. a stan &ng est 6e cre used.
  • Quali$ cations of Technical Staff. program is not adequate will be
  • Staffing 14v 1' considered and the NRC may institute Category l---Direct Baaring on Neoffh "

proceedings to suspend or revoke all or

  • , Staff S P'W1si**' -

and Safety. Cotegory findicotors on:

  • tegal Authority f
  • Staff Continuity.

pnrt of the Agreement in accordance with sectia M of the Act.

  • Status and Compatibility of
  • Licensing procedums. Category D comments concern Regulations.
  • Inspection Procedures. functions and activities which support
  • Quality of Emergency planning.
  • Inspection Reports. the State and therefore would
  • TechnicalQualityofIJcensing
  • Confirmatory Measurement. not be criti to the State's ability to Actions. These indicalors address pmgram protect the public.The State will be
  • Adequacy of Product Evaluations. funcuons which pmvfde essential asked to respond to these comments and
  • Status ofInspection pmgram. technical and administrative support for the State's actions will be evaluated
  • Inspection Fn.quency. the primary program functions. Good during the next regular prog *am review.
  • Inspectors' Performance and performance in meeting the guidelines - It abould be recognized that the Capability. for these in&cators is essentialin order categorization pertains to the I O 8

. ,.8 * '

'h ,

[f 9 , ' ,h'

E etsps .- ;

Fedmal Etegister '/ Val St. No, stS' / haday, November 18, tagg / Notices

  • q o

6 .ap d- of te oewellindiostor and > Anding af adagency and emmpettbeltyD thnely manner,normall p ' not to ese af Ibe guidehnes within abst endiostor. Par example "yeebaloel made. . etadoption by NRC. y wleta 3 years .

t*

I Quality ofideensing Acuensis a . Pmgram p g,,gg,g,,,,g the ty should be provided for la comment es proposed l

CategoryI todiestor.De review of 8888388'88 1

'i abasses(Required by I noense appucevons tw the purpose of ~ no e8estiveness of any State uhtmCA fw wanium millmguistion.)

f, ovalesting the applionare quahSostions, sedistion sentrolyropam(RTJis -

  • Purenant to the terms of the faciuties, equ4 ment, and procedseJ le d* pendent upon me onderlyles aetherity Ayeement, opportunity should be ,

essential to esauring that the pubDe ted the PCPin State legisleden, ans provided for me NRCto sonunent on '

heale and safetyisin protealed. .4 lemented in the State regulations. dren changesin State regulations.

One of tem guidelines - this ladioster ennaeres pmlicensing visita.

Regulanons S'hich heensing.prodde the foundsuas upon. Payens 5t=====* Ormseissues Inspecean,and ne need fe end sits depends en b *afam* met dedstons are made, ne enoodveness of any State RCP asture of the sped 8eesse andis a uses also provide te standards i.

matter of judgment en the part of the ' prules within whis es agulated mage wi dependet span hslocadon to overau 8:ste w3anisadonal hoensing stan.no secosas of a 9 tate must opete.Mo&c NWiens a structum.no RCPshould bein a posinen to sempete effectively with 71o&cahrdon not depend asin moedag noosenery en owwaD technology,tapev=edto reDect hchanghy objecove - ,; other health and safety preipams for hural adhwance a mob :=aa===nA.A ourrent recommendations by technical budget and stafLPrepas management f-Suleine. advisory and consistencywith must have ecosas toindividuals or N "Cuidehnes for NRC Review of NRC tions.Procedores for peups which establish health.and l Agreement State Radiation Control preddaginput to the NRCenproposed safety program priorities.m RCP Programs" willbe and by the NRC sta5 changes to NRC regulations are abould be organised to achieve a high during its onsite reviews of Agreement neces.s intemets and requirements.nosary l

State pmgrams Such myiews are gi,g, functions,toand assum consideration a-aawtions. of the - d pubhc and.in'pardeular, aReated Jndsopvitan u/ddmee

conducted at approximatelyla month I ' classa of heensen obould to yested .
intervals, there are no alsnacant Catego I or Ame if damed necessary. E the opportunity and time to comment en Location of Radiation Control Program rule changes.

g

    • Within State Organization (Category II) 2asficosomar.dGuldelmas
  • h RCPabould be located in a approximately se ===&a .

Kagal Authority (Category 1)

In Andag of adequcy, the al h e pragmms.

NRCconsi areas of the State & Program Director should bevc.

  • Clear statutory authodty should neceu 2 appropriatelevels of State

' program which are critical to its primary exist, designating a State radiation function. i.e. protection of the public management.

health and safety. Por example, a State -

controlagency and prowl for'

  • Whm regulatoryimponsibuities stion of regulations, that is not carrying out its inspechen are &Hded betwun Bute agendes, program, or falls to on and entweement clear understandags should exist as to 1 d to -

)

, significant radiologi incidents would division of responsibilities and I t

mot be considered to heve a program thorium recovery and associated wastas requimments for coordination.

l

' pureuant to the Uranium Mill Tailings  !

adequate to protect the public health Radiation Control Act of1g73 Interal Organization of Radiation - I and safety. Basic radiation protection ControlPropam(Category 4 etandards, such as exposure halts, also (UMmCA)must have statutes enacted 1 to atabush clear authority for the State

  • DeRCP should be organised with dimetly effect the State's ability to to carry out the mquirements of  !

tect public health and safety.ne the view toward achieving an UMMCA. . . acceptable deyes of star emciency, 4

i for in Status and Compatibility of Regulations Place a o o (CategwyIl g ,,p ,,,,,,,g,,,,,,,,,

technical definitions and terminology, i

< partionlarly as sieled to units of

  • b State asust have reguladens '

managementfor the execution of I i

measurement and radiation does. essentially identical to 10 CFR Part 18, .

l Maw +=== permissible doses and levels program poucy. j Part so (radiation dose standards. .

  • Whm regional amoes or other i of radiation and concentrations of efDuent unita, waste manifest rule and '

radioactivity in unrestricted areas as povernment agencies are utihned, the

' certain other parts). Part 31 (techaloal lines of communication and specifiedin to @R Port soare definitions and requirements, a considered to be important enough to - administrative aantrol between these  !

performance objectives,finasolal omces and the centraloMoe (program requim States to be essentially , assuranoss) and those mquired bF equivalentin this areain order to Dimetor)should be clearly drawn to UMI1tCA. as implemented by Part 40. nrovide uniformityinlicensing and protect pubuc health and safety. Certain

  • h State should e other '

[nspection pohcies, procedures and procedures, such as those involving the regulations to maintain a dayee of supwvision.

l licensing of products containing . . uniformitywithNRC tiens. 2 l radioactive materialintended gar -

  • For those regulations deemed a . Imgal Assistance (Catesmy W

< interstate com also require a high metter of compatibility by NRC, State

  • alstaff should be assigned to degree of uniformity.lf me serious ,

regulations abould be amended as soon assist RCP or procedures should

( performanos problems enfoundin an u es practicable but not later than a years. exist to obtain legal assistance Agreement State propam and ifits

  • NRCPhasestablished expeditiously.!agal staff should be i . standards and program procedures are . procedures for effecting appropelste . knowledgeable regarding the RCP 1 . compatible with the NRC program, a - en=ndments to State regulations in a - program. statutes, and regulations.

s

Federal Register / Vd. St. No. 219 / %ursday. November 18,19e6 / Notices ett'ry Technical Advisory Committees

  • b Men should dehne the * - "taforme6on and otbar (category B) responsibilities and acoons to be taken fumedens required of the ^

program.

by state agendes.h Plan aboald be Adadnistrouve r am in .

  • TechalcolComunittees.Pederal 8pecific as to persons responsible for addition to the technical g n' .. __

l Agencies, and other ruowos euhsod in heensing, and inspecuan and inideting rupom medona, conducung crganisations stan c.,abmdesshould.be f. q. o,used to extend u= =d *=P.

- -fw-m=. .

cIl7 be degna M@WE A$t te , established with appropriately 1.

  • Program management should j

Conunittee should be used to county and State agendes. Plans should receive pedodic sports from the staN broad guidance on the usa en the status of meulatory acuans radioactive drugs en or on bumans.N be estributed to appmydam peons -

and agencies.NRC should be provided (backlogs, problem cases, taquiries.

Committoo should spewent a wide spectrum of medical discipunes.N the opportual to coment em the Plan - regulanan mv'shas). 1 l Conunittee abodd advin the RCPno whusin draft

  • R@ mamagemene should
  • De plan ehoutd he reviewed. . t periodiceDy assess workload trends.

policy matters and regulations related to annuaUy by Prob'am star for adequacy la oron humans. - and to determite ti.st content is current, s resources and changes in legislative and l ese of radioisotNuld be developed

  • Procedures to segulatory responsibthties to forecast cvoid conthet of laterest. even though pwlodic druls abdd be performed to - aseda for incrused staE. equipment.

l' tut the plan. -

servlees and fundings.

l Committees are advisory.his does not ' '*

l mean that representatives of the Budget (Category B)

  • Program management should l l regulated community should not serve perform periodic reviews of selected l

on advisory committees or not be used e Opwenns funds Aodd b pScgg Boonse cases handled by each reviewer l

to support program mdo su, as e g and domunent the twdts. r' ampt ax es consultants. travel necessary to 1.he conduct of an b ( d

=+=s State RCP management must be able routine ctl ic3 inspecuons Ondudng pro-licensing or g A d. en abould receive second party mvlow l

visits) and responen to lacidents and ,,,,,,g,,,,, ,,,,,g,g,,, ,,,,,gg,,g),

to meet program goals through stmng, direct leadership at alllevels of , other emergendw. instrumentation and rWe f hopcoma, l supervision. Administrative procedura othw moponws toinddents and other reports an enforcement actions abould i are necessary to assure uniform and mwsucia. instmmutation and other also be perforsid.

ment to support the RCP, appropriate treatment of all regulated a strative costs in operating the

  • mg Som nthw
  • parties. Procedures for receiving . government agencies are ut!!ised.

information on radiological incidents, Program inclu&ng retal chesges, program management should conduct amergency response. and providing printing costa, laboratory services. ,g g ,g information to the public are necessary, computer and/or mrd procesalag support. preparation of correspondents OSco Equipament and hyport Services Procedures to provide feedback to supervision on status and activities of omos equipment. bearing costa, etc. as (Category B) the RCP are necessary. Adequate appmP'$ .

  • b RCP abould have adequate ,

. Pdnci facilities. equipment and support gung funds d skdd onW b escretarial and clericalsupport, i andre ty,i.e., general tas A oma du Data tilast o f ources.

I.aboratory support services should be fees. etc. Supplemental funds may be hdd h pMk k @ Wr I obtained through contracts, cash grants, administered by the RCP or be ruddy

'I"'

than H boenam) .Simnar ovellable through established services should be av regional administrative procedures. hboratory Support (Category B) omon.Eadused. l in order to meet program goals a

  • Professional staff should not be
  • De RCP abould have laborst State RCP must have adequcte support ce bihty inhouw.or me y sued for fee coUection and other clerical budgetary support.De total RCP budget avallable t ugh established duties.

must provide adequate funds for salaries, trevel costs associoted with the P**d"'#' 88 88" dud *****F8 - ~ Pubbe information (Category E) analyze environmental samples, a'nalyse .

compIlance program,labatory and umpW puecwd by hepam, etc.on ~ '

  • laspection and licenhing files shov!d survey instrumentation and other a priority established by the RCP. be available to the public consistent equipment and other administrative with State administrative procedures. it oosts.N program budget must reflect Administrative Procedures (Category 5) is desirable.bowever, that there be annual changes in the number and
  • Re RCP should establish written provisions for protecting from public complexity of applications and beenses. internalpolicy and administranve disclosure proprietary information and and the lacrosse in cost due to normal dures to assure that pmgram . Information of a clearly personal nature.

inflaten- ctions are carried out u required and

  • Opportunityforsublicbearings Indmote and Gu/deline, to povide a high Ggree of uniformity should be provided in accordance with and continuity in regdstory Uht!RCA and applicable State Quelhy chtgency Planning hoe procedures should adbrectices. es eNatatrative procedure laws.

I"8'** 8"""

e S te RCP should have a e to lns cuon cles.

written plan for response to such decommissioning andlicense N RCPmust be staffed with e incidents as spills, overexposure, termination, fee collection contacts with suRdent number of trained personnel, transportetien accidents, fire or communication media. con!Het of . b evaluation of license applications explosion, theft. etc. interest policies for employees. . t. and the conduct ofinspections require 4

q. OE

" Ott$ Oosister / %d. St $1o. .t19 /1buseder. N:vemberis, ages}Nottoes

.h E

[F etaff with kHispth training ama .. .

  • Juniorpersen'not abased be taltially capadenes in redi: tion pressolen and subadtteda the agency and Ost these

- hadted use liceW3Cyphoeboas ' clemen me:t sweent tory

  1. elated subjects.De cladamest bc andinspecting progpses ender

. guidance fordeemibing isotopas er A )

p- adequate in numbw to assers haesales. i olose supervielen. , quantities to be used, quaEsations of .

inspection, and cderoament a :tions of 'm a h (CstegwF B) . -

perseas who wi'a use asterial, facihties

- appropriate eustify to mesu=e pretention of the pubhc balth and ufety, periodic andegelpment andoperatingand '

  • Seniorparecenalabeeldbeve

~ training of aalstas suff is accesany to em m 5.sufficantto .

attended NRCsere soursesla heema% estab ' the heels for boensing actions.

mantain espebihties a aispid!y .. arientaties,inspectles - C' changlag technological enviroemmt. medical prootices and ladestdal -

  • ptelisenstag visits should be made ,

management persenselseast be ; todiagraphypressoas. (Forinill States.

  • for complex ano major licensing actions q Bed to esordee adequese r31D esining aboeld also be innleded.)
  • Moemens aboekt be clear esoplete'.' r supervision in el! wpects of a Suw . and amourets as tolsotopes. forms, o radiation control geogram. .* .
  • The R& abound beve a program to ' gi.anttues, sothertsed uses, and

. . atilise spectSc abort courses ans .qs mg,, ,,g g,g,,, .

worksbops to maintala appapdate less1 pwaneelve er restrictive sendittees. t u

.. , . - of staff tenbnical sospetence in areea of

  • W HCP should have procedures Quell 6cetionsAf bludoelStag . abangingtenbasiegy. . - for twelrrnias Moonses prior to renewal , .

(CategoryZij j ( to essere that supporcis information in Staf Condouity(Categuy5); thre Glo reDeots lbs cursnat scope of the L

  • ProfesoladsteReboddhave """"d 8"8'**'

bachelor's degree o equivalent trainias' . StaN twneear abound beWhimi .

in the physicaland/or ufe sciences. by combinations of opportumswer Adequacyof pireduct Evaluations Additional troislug and experience in treink [ Category 0 agg s,promo6ons and congWw.s .

"[

g protectice. program should be

,g ,,

e 0"E 80*9"*'*I8

, g hor ter de se pedessional Woma.Sa and de d Stateof oomanensurete with the type of bloenses "

assued andinapected by the Stata. dodd be comparable to sisaEar $p '"

  • W.ritten lob descriptions abould be, , employment in the geographisel area.
  • Re RCP uan structure g, ""98 **" A*'*8'N ** ** Y prepared so that professional q.a.ons neaa to nn.ooendes ab ld be noch stafturn
  • D' 8" "**

can be twdily identined,

..ou...

. d an ,,e .m con.ov.er e ,, is m' a-fac . mf-two a iaa sa

- maintained throngb,,~tonless for brochwessel,at ed.,y. fore.% y.aato radiation health StafReg tavel(Catepwy E)' oti oppse caubsauon gotion,g J.aponedwua adequacy.

  • Prefossienal 6taffhy level should be level or supervisory poeldm.W,me * ' Approvaldocuments forsealed approximatviv M.c person. year per too also abould be opportunity for periodicsorroe or devios designs abould be hoenses in eaccia.RCP must not aave clear,compleu and escurate as to Jess than two professionals evallable tsaressees cosapedbh with expertence wilb training and experience to operate " .ndeesponsibiluy*

. Anotcyes, fanns. quantities. nees, h In.-, e ra RCPin a way which parvides drawing identiacetions, and permissive

. ang or restrictive conditions, continunus coverage ami continuity.

It is necessary in boensing byproduct-

  • For States reguleting uranian m!!!s sowos. and special nuclear meterials Doensing procedoes(Category R) and idll tauings, catent indicauona are tha* thir State regulatory obtain
  • The RCP abould have internal that 2. IL75 professional person. years' of information about the see of heensing , obeckhsts, and policy effort, ladsding consultants. are needed nuclear materials, fa ties and - m oonalstest with omvent to process a new alu Boonse tindudias equipment training and expertones of. ' NRCpractos.

in site mille) or major renewal to meet personnel, and operating procedwee

  • Moensea,pphimats(including requirements of Ursdam MinTsGings ' appropriots for determining that the applicants forsomewals)should be Radietion Control Act of1918.his applicant can operate safely andin effort must include expertise in - furnished copies of applicable guides complience with the regulations and and regulatory positions.

radiological matters, hydro %y.ssology, heense constions. An nece '

and structural engineering.8 Baensing programinclados:ptable

  • The present cornpliance status of preparation hoensees abould be consideredin Sta!! "~^'~(CategoryB) . and use of Internal Besasing guides and ' hoensing annons.

pobey memoranda to assure technical

  • Supervisory personnel should be .
  • Under the NRC Exchange.of-quahty la the lloonsing program (wban Information program, evaluation ebeets, adequate to provide guidance and appropriate, such as in maall programs, servios hasnees, and licenses review the work of seet'e and Junior NRC Guides may be used) relicensing ,

personnel. outborising distribution to general '

Inspection of complex fadhties; and the

  • Seniorpersonnelit.ouldreview implementation oradministrative Doennees ebould be subialtted to NRC applicat6ons andinspectlicenses proedures to assure documentation and . on a thnely basis, independently. monitor work of Calar mali.tnuance of adequate IEas and ,
  • StandardBoonseconditions perecemel, and participate in the nostda. , comparable with curret NRC standard establishment of pohey. ,;

4 s, hoense constions should be used to  !

. . .. . . r . . , Amyaegr,e,ow gigeria, 4. . 3- expedite and pro *dde uniformity b the eAdda TechnicalQuality ducens% Actions ,

ye,,, gag ,,,,,,,

l forcea.ne Nt,p eed e s.dauncim shet>eurs. >+= (CategoryI) .

  • Files abould be maintained in an 7",c ** ,

orderly fuhton toshow Amst acewate 4 r PErse,

! seemsaos es rmansg

  • W RCP abould.asure the assential strieval ofinformation and j
i. 41ements of applications have been

. documentation of discansions and visits. '

T o

m_

i Federed Megiaw / Vel St. No. 219 /1thursasy. Anemiser 13. asas / Nodass ups  !

~ j I

Psuapuunallenmatr f . Inspecton' performance and Ompshn4y f;r the le afsaanneurypeeldes are l j

Periodic inspections 6f teenned swd re n nenande

  • Inspectors 6eddbe conipotentto
  • En!--naan leuers shodd be  !

operations are mentis 1 to mun1st 4/.. : and Asanod within 30 days following )

I activities are being conducted in evolute to determinabeehWlanea and safetyEh s Staae inspections and should employ comphance with regtdatory appropriate esguistory language death requirements and consleterrtwfth good regdetions. Inapartans amat demonstrate to superviales as opedfytngatitems of noncompliance salaty pra m m. & M d and health and safety taat?smidentI!ied inspections depends on t'he arnount and undestaasag of regwNiena.hapamaa guidea.and policies pnarto durigs theinspection and refe'enetag i the kind of materialte type of speration bcensed, and the neehe of independam%:= My 7h the appropdate regulation or 11cenee l a necam @ mmagentaw W cm & M W ng W dete. j p'revious inspections. N capabillty of be RCP manapar) abould candnat eenmal

  • Edorcementler.e s should specffy maintstrdqs and ntrieving statfstice ~

l deta on th status of the compflance fi8Id ***I*8tA888 *f **Ch 188P8Ct8r G8 the uma pededfarthe %cenm to program is neoaseary.The sagdatory asms .- = ~ and name sospond krdicaling corrective actions caeracy must have the necessary ingel 8Ppbeation of appropdations and and se e.;a taken to prevent re. )

consistant pokcias and geWea. ocemwnee InormaBy 3D-se days).h i author!ty for prompt enforcamaet date j Response to Actualand AEayed inspector anf cataphance espervisor regulations.TW snet loo %de se incidents (Categay1) should review beensee 'sponses. l appropriate, adnamistratin serzedies, crders equiring correcthe we"

  • Ingsides 6oddbe pmmp0y me6e
  • h moponset so enforcement l suspues}on or wwcetiam of homenes, the to evensh 6e twdfw onste letters abould be promptly -

impouadmg of meterielu.end the acknowledged as to sdequacy and investigations, imposing of det end cruded peneWeo.

  • Onsits irrvest:getions When1dise rescintion af p ' sursimbud promptly made ofinddents reqpddag items.

ladeogruadG~ wl--

  • Writtan procedures abould exist for reporting to the Agencyintass tanse l Status of ins.pedot Proyram tCetegory days. (to CFR70.003 types). handling escalated saforcement cases of l

I)

  • For these incideuts not mel., varying dgrosa.

rep rting othe Agemyinhas han30 * ]mpoundlasof smalarlalabould bein

  • Shh RCF Aodd maidais as days. investigations shedd be .usde accordance with State edadnistrativa gg P"8" *% 8 dwing the wxt schedrded bspection. procedures.  ;

Scanso @ wit -

  • oppo,% fedgesuddse mgest,onssed u se.a _ o=* y p e dw provided to assursimpartial
  • The RO'aboald seein'.ein sts6stics Se to hlchy a n r=nt a traSemdasradiaumcontrol ,

which are adeqsate to penet progress pubhc &atorest and connent e.g., prcgram, Management to assess the status cf the transportatiry eoddsats.

insW program an a penadic inde

  • Investig6tions should lor 3ade sapectaan procedmes(CateparyIt) I information ebowing she ==d=r of indepthrenews of cknenstemoes and
  • InspecHon guidas consistent with inspe:tions conducted, the number should be completed on a high gasoday curnnt NRCguidance, shodd be used overdua. the length d time overdue and bas 4a. When apprepaak, ts&',

shodd krJula esanactrasats aslene by inspectors to assure uniform and tl.e priedry categsdas abound be sad 4 study measuremenMasmaaliywiens a complete Icspection practices and l availa W. provide tadhnicalguidance in the j

  • At least semina==at enspectaan few days). Inves tigeSon for inspectiesQ results ahodd be domuranted and inspction oflicensed prcyrams.NRC planning for number ofinspections to be Man maybe used U prope@

perfonned ea4nments lo senior va. enforcement adon taken aban '

appmpriate. supplementedby potcy memoranda, junior staff, a:Mgnments to regions,

  • State licensees and the NRC shodd agency interpretations, etc.

identUkatino d apacial needs and

  • Wdtteninspection potclos abodd periodic Atatus nports.When baMnpa be notified of prtinen!1cformation about anyinddentwh% coddbe leeissueato setstilsh a policy for occur, fhe pog am should dnelqp and
  • relevar.1 to other licensed operations eonducting a;nannoun=6 inspections.

implement a plantondoce the bW (e.g.gepmesfaDm kepspar staining corrective a: tion,fatowing ny Theplan aboddidennfypdadtiesfor and dostng out prerlons vidations, OParohng proceden).

inspections and estahtsh target detes

  • Infwmetionenincidentslavehg inter 6ewtagworksrs and cburving end milestones for anessing p: ogress. fe9ev cfgehmet dWJ be prov6ded operations, asswing ex)t taterviews with inspection Frequency (Categorya to the agency responsRAe fw welentoe management. and issuing appro L ste 8 # 85 * * * **8L*f notification ddele5 ens ofb thend
  • The RCP sbould establish am saMy probians.

Pou Qp inspection pr>arity systan.& specti c wd *nn (

  • own Md k edsWahed l

frertuency ofinspections should be dt <- = ****o===~wu-h - dnea * ,<aned w r* d medied di.,noseo,t,e ceasdtants

,eae ,a %, wh.ee usede.es.e.

histories.

licensed operstions. e.g., mejor RCPsh & s h h w proces sws, sad industdal endiogrephere consduam foropcialpmb1 mas des

  • Oral trrietieyi of supervisors or the should be inspected apprnzjsaatalF - needed.

senior inspector should be ,.JC annually.sms!1er orlees hasardaus upon setunimes amrostine operations mey be 1:spectedless Enforcement Piecedans {CategoWV . inspections, frequently. The mWm"= W*" .

  • Enfere====r Pir-==has na==slal be
  • For States with seperste heanains frequency includens Aocdollial tufficient to provide a substantial and inapection statis procedures should inspectioLis shoWA be soless than the deterrent to in'oetisee acacomplisses be established for feedback of NRC syskm. with regu! story requireementa.pppvisians informadon to beenst reviewers.

m .

s

"1 p (1200' Federal Regisier 1 WL 81. Na, *le 1 %rsday. November 18.19881 NoHon ' .

j

- I. , inspectionRyorts(CeteraryB)

, CCMPS -+

,. , wenatierbasemedinWabingin DC xmmeer sinn, h-

'e Findings ofinspections should ba ,

r documentedin a report ducribing the Wormahon Caesagen , unda an ceugary,

>8 ocope of inspections, substantiating all ' Under(NAS Revlow Andemww/wManeswar. 1 items of noncomphance and beelth and PR Doc.m.ar;'34 yiid u 18.ea.a. m t* Notification ofrevision and safety matters, describing the scope of exten request of Peace ' form assanssusa m beenses' programs, and indicating the PCs olantser appDestion - -------- -

substance of discussions with licensee ,

ananagement and licensee a response.

W Dwho - N OF PEML t

  • Reports abould unifonaly and

% dort behn bem anansanraseuy adequately do:urnent the rwu2t of esbmitted te Offlos of Management inspections including confirma%ry

- i ad Budged in N .as PropoesidIrdormenon measurements, status of previous mquired by he perwork Reduction Sulmetod to 0185 for

$. get, g, p.m is ,,9,w .

  • . noncompUance and identify areas of the, , og avisioas,.. tin 8 -

g g Boonsee's program which shodd moelvo mr r.e M security, medical - _ t.

special attente at the next inspectien- requirements, and a year Acnom Nodce.

. Reporta should show the status of extensionfor using form. ..

previous noncompUance and the moult

  • sumasptfARY sussatARY:In cewis &e '

of cordiamatorymeasurements by the nossDe form Paperwork * += Act of seso(title

. inspector. is onepleted voluntaru appucants 44. U.S. C ptar 35), this notice i for the Peace % andit annouause information l Confirmatory Measurenemts (Category des basicinformatir - *; sollecdon public that was ~ l B) feksmad, educetmp.q dons, submi. .DMB for clearance.RI a Confirmatory measuremera should '

language skillsipreference, Dis 34 1. F' cielResources Questionnaire r, be sufficient 19 nurher and type to informat% tshcneary for ce wW be by the Office of Personnel

Corpe staff to perform meini - , ement to ascertain the ability of ensure the bcensee's coat ol t/1 sensening between quaBBed materials and te vehdate the hoensee's indi duals to mimburse the vagushfied naamates, for sel a Ce traent as a result of overpayment i measurements. from aarons the qualified, and for de from the Ovil Seitice Retirement
  • RCPinstrumentation should be - 4 '

pmperplacementof thepotential d Disability Fand.For copies of this adequete for st.rveying floonse volunteersinsuitable programs and J onlllames M.Farron, Agency operations (e.g., survey meters, al' eettlagt ,. ,

Clearance Officer, on (302) 432-7714-samples, lab counting equipment for 'iitle and Agency Nebber: Peace SATE Comunents on this propobal amears, identification ofisotopes, etc). Corps Volunteer Appbcation. Form

! should be received within to working

'

  • RCPinstrumentetion shouldinclude Nanber PC-tad 2. days from the date of this publicetin.

the icilming types: GM Survey Meter.

  • nOfBoe: Volunteer Reauinnent -

0-60 mr/hr: lon Chamber Survey Meter ' ; Selection, '

Send ordeliver comunents several r/hr: m8cro R Surver metet, 7. ,- n y of Collection:On Neutron Survey Meter, Fast and GeneralDucription of Res sion. J M.Parron. Agency Clearance ts: cer U.S. Offlee of Personnel nermah Alpha Survey Meter, Individuals applying forPeace i o 2000,010c/m: Air Samplais,Hi and14 M asement,1s00 E Street. NW.,

Servies. R esto, Washington, DC 30415 Voliune: 14b Counters. Detect o.opl ac/

wipe:Velometers:Smoks Tubes tapel EstimatedNumberofP - M ts:

14.000 annually.

Air samplers. - Kade Informadon Duk Officer, Estimated Hours for dentsTo office o ormation and Reguletor) e lastrumett calibration services or Furnish Informa' tion: On each- i facilities sliould be roeday stallable and , Affairs, ce of Management and Rupondents Obliga ToReply: .Dudget.R 3235, New Executive

- approprWe forinstrumentation used. Voluntary, Ucenser eqdpment sind facilities should Offlee Bull NW., Washington, E O Comments:tatere persons are. 3080s not be med unlen under a service - invited to submit tsnegarding oontract. Exceptions for other State post pusman nom contract:

this form byname comuments

  • 1 Agencies, es, a State Unie stelty, may Jamn L.Bryson, ) 832-6472.

should be sent Picoult OMB be mada. esk CVfloor. as of Management and U.S.Offias of Management. I

. A, ens in,t,umenis , sed ,o, .

D.udgei. New *e Omn undag. -- <

d

"mecag,"3' '~r"gaa,
la "c"m"ai aido.idl JllPenito - $~C arnem >= =~)

tae inie,vd as ,e --i dbe>eceived nor ==- = --

. being inspeced. ,ni,ed a e ucenseebefore . N ember as,1808, Deted at washinsten. DC this sib day of "'

Neember sees- [mn e, ' $Ar.dys Proposed Estention of Al 20-9 For the Nuclear Reguisiory Comuniselen. Off of VolunteeiRecruitment and Sel on. Peace Corpr. 808 Connecticut,. aemecy:offlee of Persound

  • Sammell.chilk. -

Av us. NW., Room 14 400. Managanant.

secrosaryofdecome feelon. shington, DC 30626, telgbone (302) Acnose Notice PR Doc. es-taso6 Filed 11-13.et eds am) .

. GuesetAny:In accordam wie se i j

" * " " " "  % Isis not a proposalto which 44 Paperwork Reduction Act of1980 ( 4 U.S.C.4806(h) appues. ' < 44. U.S. Code, chapter 351, this notice 120555003882 1 1CY1CJ US NRC l

, OSP-STATE AGREEMENTS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER AR-5233 WASHINGTON DC 20555

&

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20237J066&oldid=3273484"