ML20237F766

Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying License Condition 2.F.(1) & Deleting Remaining Content from App B of Environ Tech Specs

ML20237F766
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	08/06/1987
From:	TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20237F750	List: ML20237F748 ML20237F755 ML20237F766
References
NUDOCS 8708130153
Download: ML20237F766 (24)

Text

_ _

/

t.

DB-1 ENVIR0hhEVTAL TECHNICAL' SPECIFICATIONS 4

A ppe ndix B 46 o pea cq L ic e n se tJ P F - 3 ks been c,limkal<) In NS '

enna y.

\

PA (IST OF TABLES ., ... . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , , , , , Tii LISTsOF FIGURES ......................,,/ iv

!.0 CEF N; C iS

.....,.................,/ 1.0 .

/

.e

......4.. .....,L........;....c

i. i. s c1

.,....y

.............. ... 3.

2.1 (Delet /

f

?.2 (Oeleted) 2J (Deleted) 2.4(Deleted)

~

N '

3.0 ENV!TtC5."EVTAL SL'RVEILLANt! . . . . . . f . .......... 3,1 1

\ /

l 3.1 en-radic1cgical Suncillarce '

.d............ 3.1 1 l 3.1.1.a (Celeted) \

l 3.1.2.a (0eleted) \

l 3.1.2.b Biotic . Terrestria \ ....... ,,.... 3.1 12 3.2 (Oeieted) \

\

4.0 SPECIAL SURVEILLANCE, A)D STUDY ACTIV ES . . . . . . . . . . 4.11 4.1 C;eratiCnal Noise /Suncillance .. .......... 4.11

\

4.2 (0eleted) / 'y

\

4.3 (Celeted)

s

,/' \ ,

f

! \

8709130153 870006 PDR ADOCK 05000346 \ l p PDR .

s l

/ i

/

1 Amendnent No. )6, M,86 i i 1

i

[ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

i 08-4 i

FACE i j

c.

AD.M ::!$TRATIVE C0KTROLS ................... 5.1-

'5. aview and Audis ............,...... 5.1- 1

l. 5. Station Review Board . ... . . . . .-. . . . 5.1-1 E 5.1.2 pany Nuclear Review Board . . . . . . ... . 5.1-1 5.1.3 Oua Assurance Manager . .... ...... 5,1-1 L.

• l

!- '5.2 Action To Be Taken as the Event of 31 ation of An Env.ror. ental Technical gecift on . . . . . . . . . . 5.2-1 i

3 5.3 operating treceduies . .. ..sss ............ 5.3-1  ;

5.4 utrements . . . . . . . .... . . . 5.6 1 t*nitReportin[g7, 5.4.1 Roupt Reports

. . .. . . . ..... .. .. . 5.4-1

5. 4. 2J' f.-Routine Repor t s . . . . ....... . . . 5.4-2

,, , 5.4 r changes .. ................. 5.4-4 i I

(

. Records Retention . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5. l I

r.

b 4

h t

f i.

g

)

( .-

i '

\

08 1 +

L EWYIRO* ENTAL TECHNICAL $ SPECIFICATIONS 1

l LIST OF TABLES l

Table Number Title Pace  !

2.4-1 (Deleted) 2.4 2 (Deleted) .

2.4 3 (Deleted) 2.4-4 (Deleted

2. 4- 5 Deeed) 3.1 1 D eted) 3.2 1 (Deleted) 3.2 2 ,/ (Deleted) 3.2 3 p

/ (releted) j

/

/

/ '

/

l Amendnent No. ff, 86 111

)

08-1 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATI0 j LIST OF FIGLTRES .

I rint. I 4

Kwtsr -

Title Page  !

/ \

. 3.1-1 (Deleted) {

3.2-1 (Deleted) 3,2-2 (Deleted) 3.2-3 (eleted) l i

i i

I Amenknent Mo. PJ. 86 tv f

i 08-1

/ '

2.0 1.!MITING NOITIONS FOR OPERATION 2.1 (Deleted) 2.2 (Deleted) 2.3 (Deleted)

/

2.4 (Deleted) /

'N

/ N'N wnantvo.fy,ss 2.1 1

(  !

l l

1

(

)

(

(This page intentionj y left blank)

/ ,

l

05-!

I:.~i ' !.;;f .I:s~.s'. T.Tl * *.".i::"~

3 .'  ::en-Radiological Surveillance Enviro::n ncal surveillance programs shall be develop to monitor the non-radiolog 1 impacts from the Davis-5 esse Nuclear er Station Unit No. 1.

This survei 'ance shall generally consist of sj rrestrial envi-ren=antal this program con s (h 11 coccance at cocmaric3oring In general described in program tinue as describe Yoperation of the unit and con-cf unit operation. in the following par fraphs for approximately two years be shorter.or longer *he actual lengt of the program described below may an two yeay depending upon results. Upon review and approval by the Nu(cigar Repdatory Ccamission, e less inten shall impact befor implemented the life oftc* theut1Ln fin a check on the unit's non-radiological it.

The details of this less intensive pro-gram shall be anticipated that thi determine upon nalysis of the first two years data. It is program shql be similar to the one described telev but reduced in fr uency and inteca ty.

3.1.1 (De 4ted)

Note: Pa ges 3.1 I, 3.1-11 have been l

Amendment No. 55 3.1-1 deleted. The next cage h 3.1 -12. '

l l

11 .

3 :.1,o

~e rr ntrts,: Ir.n ?:rm::1 Mtni:ortng Program Cb'e:tive .,

1.

To =coitor the of f ects -of the unit's cooling tower on'aigrating birds.

2.

To monitor changes in ve getation cover types on and adjacant the site. a 3.1. b.1 Bird Collisicne Speciti scion The coolin tower shall be monitored during the migratory per ods (i.e.

April, P.ay, ' ate Augurt, Septceber and October) to deter =in instanc.es when 100 or more b(rds havy collided vich the coolics rsver in tventy-four hour period. When e era ag'e 100 or more bird impacts in a tv ty-four hour period the cumbe anci stacies compo.sition shall b a tec ded.

i Esg During nigratory perte s the pusibilhy utses y at during adverse weather conditions when birds a t forced to fly at lov ltitudes and visibility is limited, the potential ex\sts for a large (>l ) bird impact on th& cooling tover. This potential doe not exist durin nonmigratory periods.

3.1.2.b.2. Vegetation Survey Specification Color infrared aerial photography a a/:.1 be used during the first tvo years of the unit's operation to detect .

ges in the composition, areal extent and general health of vegetationf ovat types. The photography shall be taken under clear sky's with 14 haze d- ing July or August at a scale of 1 ,

9 I inch equals 500 feet. The arra of covera e shall be a two mile radius f rom the unit and for each year de flight lines' altitude; time of day; make '

and model of ca: era, lens nd flicer; 4nd f. a type and processing shall be the same.

interpretation of the 4 erial photogragby shall i clude ground observations of vegetation cover y;es. The presence, distrib gion and health of dom- {

inant plant specis shall be recorded (e.g. chang:s\in distribution of emergent aquatic lants).

Infor ation for the grovih season concerning lake levels, gr und water levels, practpitacion, and t perature shall be su .arized to id in the photographic interpretation.

jases

~he inf ared aerial photography vill serve as =eans to docu en ing signifi-cant p..anges in the vegetation cover types adjacent to the unit. Based on the Sest available inculedge concerning inpacts frca nuclear pcVet no adverse impacts are predicted durring operation of the Oavis-Bes) plants, Nuclear 1

? var Station, Unit 1. Should sign.ficant changes in the vegetation be observed, additional studies vill b e ccnducted to deter:ine the causer for such changes.

3 1-12

1 08-1 3.0 ENVIRO E SURVEILLANCE 3.2 (Delete-(

l l

1 Amendunt No. 86 3.2 1

d i

.i N

x 1

]

(This ge int tionally left blank) r' s.

I l

._ __ .- _ _ _ _ _ _ - __-____-____O

l

\

33-!

.0 3p! IAL fi.T.'II:.*a:CI, AND STL*DY ACT.~.':TIIS I

, .1 Operational Noise Surveillance l

1

,Cb' active )

j

\ l The hbjective of this program is to conduct a noise survey in t. vicinity j of th Davis-Basse site during coreal unit operation. The res ts of the survey hall be used to aseset; the noise impact of the cpera on of Unit. j a

No. 1.

I Specificati.ns .

Methodology In devisi:s the ethodology to be used dur consideration shaP be given to ANSI 53'a'50g vh chefperational noise' ch establishes survey, a cathod for the evaluation f noise in an area in whic the ambient sound levels result f rem the supe sosition of cultiple noi e sources. The survey periods and the number of sa: ing points in the su ey area shall be chosen in order to develop a stat stical state =ent o the noise levels in the vicin-icy of the site. During the survey, noi sensitive land use and specific noise sour:es shall be id tified. Mea urements shall be obtained near.

critical locations of noise sensitive and use such as the nearest resident, school, hospital, cemetery, nd vil ife refuge which may be affected by noise frem unit operation. M (sur ents shall be obtaintd in the vicinity of the unit during the hours of 4 ytima (0700-1900 hours), evening (1900-2200 hours), and nighttime (220 0700 hours0.0081 days <br />0.194 hours <br />0.00116 weeks <br />2.6635e-4 months <br />) over a evo day period during representative environ = ental 1 ts operating at full load withi one ad)-ions and at after the while unit hasDavis-Besee achieved operation l'ait Ne.

at rated lead. De survey / hall be onducted during a period when the construction activities usociated vi h the Oav*.s-3 esse site shall be ini-

=al and do net contribu/e significant1, to the noise levels.

• he instru=entation nach shall be used d ring the operati:nal netse survey shall consist of t following:

1. Bruel and Kjaer Type 2209 Precision Sound Level Meter

2. 3ru and Kjaer Type 1613 Octave Til er Set

3. Bry.el and Kjaer Type 1165 Condenser y rephone

a. fuel and Kjaar Type 4220 Pistonphone rnis in ru=entation taats the requirenants of tne .Sternaticnal Electr;n techn* al Cc: ission (IIC) for a Type I or precision ound level neter, "

A1 ch diameter condenser microphone shall be used e assure that accurate ir ambien t sound level =caourements can be made. The ter shall he l 4 castically calibrated ustng the S&K Fistonphone bef ore nd after each '

ensurement period to assure continued accuracy. All neas re ents snal; be ade vsing an open-celled polyurethane foam vind screen to ' tenuate tne effect of vind generated noise. Headphones shall be used to eter-ane any distortiou, i= proper a= plication characteristics, and intetsit ens electrical connections.

4.1-1

l 1 L

D B- 1 l >ound level = measurements shall be .:ade with the precision sound evel meter j' parated in the A-veighted slev rawonse : node. ne field esas rements 11 conform to the recoc=ent.atio. s of ANSI $3V50 except to Paragraph 2.2, s

trument Reading Procedures". n1s paragraph states t one should l

obse va the A-levd reading for five seconds and record t a best estimate of th central tendsacy and the raoge of the seter defle tions, with obrar-vation repeated until the number of readings equals or'uceeds the spread (in deci els This :sthed was -Mdified, based on erperiencl a) of all the readhgs.t other sites, because large fluctuation's to loed se rces such as tvst11rg leavu and creat5res of nature vill not five second period. . n e permittoabe

=ethod can-ed al candency involves the to be deternised observatico of t.. with[e meter tece svary five seconds regardi se of the location of tha needle vithin its svtag, nese massursments are speated until a statistically reliable sample is obtained.

De number of Ita ' gs required to achieve'this condition is determined by  !

the variability of a a2bient sound level, which ir moet cases consists of a t l ea s t 100 reading that are recorded'at each sampling point during each -

measur a= ent period. e resesurnent /pproach of taking a sample every five 4 seconds results in a st istically,isdepet. dent sample because the interval  ;

is considerably greater t the getar averaging time.

Octave band analyses shall .o ained to assess the nature of any complex noise source or to identify t presence of any pure tone associated with j t No. 1.

the operation of Davis-Sessrs / N(\

l'. meteorological conditions during t .e survey shall be docu=ented by obtaining hourly readings of the vind speed, nd direction, te=perature, temperat.;re icpse rate (1!), and,dev point from h e onsite meteorological cover.

Supple = ental data such as barometric essure shall te obtained from :earoy airports. <

/

ne operating cduditions of Davis-3 esse Un t No. 1 during the survey shal'.

be documenteFby obcatring hourly readings the steam flow rate, power output (.WeY, circulating veter flew through he natural draft cooling tower, an&' supporting operating data.

/

The data obtained during the noise survey shall b analyzed with the NUS

=ceputer code DBTRI to obtain the A-veighted L ,

,L30' L e and L g sound levels along with the cu=ul.ative percent .istrkbut.onaa!'thestan-dard deviation of the iata at each sampling point dur g each :easurement I pdried. The L sound l shalllevels (sound used levels exceeded A-vei54 of the t e) leve'

. at each sa=pling h, int then be to censtruct heed sound  !

contours on a site nap.

Operational Noise 1: pact As s es atant ,

i he results of the noise survey during unit operation shall be pared to i the pre-operational background noise levels documented in Sectie 2.9 of the Davis-Bessa Unit No. I hpplement to the Environ = ental Report w Oper- ]1 ating License Stage and several noise level criteria to assess tne idnal )

operational noise impact of Davis-Besse Unit No. 1. nese results sh 11 also provide a check on the predicted noise bpact of the operation pb e presanted in Section 5.7 of the Davis-lesse Unit No.1 Supplement to the {

Environmental laport - Operating License Stage. {

l 1

DS-;

Co 41deration shall be given to several noise level criteri in evalua g the 11:41 noise impact of tce operation phase. Theh1lDJ1seCriteria{N 6 states that sound levels up to 45 DEA are " acceptable"/for continuous 2f.- l hour e sure; levels up to 65 dBA are "corully ac aptable" provided that 65 dBA is et exceeded 7. ore than 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day evels exceeding 65 dBA more than hours per day are "normally unaccep ble"; and levels which  ;

exesed 75 d2 more than 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day or 8 d/ 5A more than 60 minutes per day-are "unace ptable". ,

ne E?A picposed \ n'aise level guidelings( ) state that in residential envi- 1 roenents, the time Deighted day /nig t' outdoor average level, belev vhich no l ef fects on public besigh and velfaf)e occur due to activity or speech inter- I farence, is 55 DEA. Such levels'vould also protect the majority of the exposed pcpulation under' sVconditions against annoyance.

Stevans, Rosenblich, an I 1 suggest another nothod that compares the background noise leve vich t. e intruding noise. Since its introduction, this nethed has be shown to b valid by the results of additional st. dies, and it is an app ch come.only us by acousticians. It indicates that up to a 5 dBA incytase in the ambient 11 usually not generate any cesplaints due to annoy ca. Up to a 10 dBA inc asse may cause a slight amount of annoyance I. 1-3

38-1 REIRINCES 1.

America National Standards batitute. "Dra Method for Measurement of Cotanun ty Noise," ANSI S3W50 (November 1, 1969).

2. In ternations Precision Soun Organf ration for Standardization, " Specifications for

. l 1.evel Meters," I 79 (1971).

3. U.S. Deperr:ent o Housieg a Urban Development, " Noise rescement and Control, Department Polley/ Implementation Responsibilities, and Standards," Circular 3 d2 (July 16,1971).

4 Environmental Prettetion kvironmental Noi(e RaquiAgency, "Information on the Development of With an Adequare Margin of ents to Protect Public Health and Velfare faty," EPA 550/9-74-004 '(March 19 74). i

5. Stavans toNoisd,KCan, ItW. A. Rosenblith, and R.H. Bolt, "A Cet= unity's Raactics Ba To recasted?'

63 /(January 1955). _Nois e Control, Vol. 1. No. 1,' pp.

/

4.1-4

4.0 5fECIA' 53/EILLA.CE ATC STUDY ACTIVITIE5 4.3 Del ted)

\

1 i

i I

l f

i l

l Amendment No. 55 4.3-1  !

_____.__..J

l l

(This pag int tionally left blank)

/

k i

~

i 35-:

5.0 A3"15*.STRA it cos;?.c.S 3.1 Review and Audit R view and audit of environmental r.atters and coepliance with th se En ironmental Technical Specifications in particular shall be p ovided by ge Station Review Board, the Company Nuclear Reviev Board and the Quall y Assurance Director. This activity shall be control d in accordance with  ? 3000 of the Toledo Edison Nuclear Quality Assuran e .W.anual.

'5.1.1 Station Review F,oard A Statien viev Board, composed of technically qual'fied s:ation persennel has been est blished to perform ~ timely and con:inu*. p reviews of unit '

Operation. . e .akeup of the !ca rd, specifica t to . of quorum, and meeting frequency are et forth in Section 6.0 of the U t's Appendix "A" Technical i Specifications. The Board's review responsib ity vill in:1ude all nev '

or revised unit e vironmental procedures, pr posed ch.anges or rodi!1 cations ,

to unit structuras or equipeent, reported v olations of the unit's Environmen:41 Techn cal Specifications, p posed changes to the unit's Environmental Technil 1 Specifications. esults of :he Envirenzen:a1 Moni:oring Pregrams p der to their sub ssion in each Envir:nmental Operating Repert, and a y occurrence f a safety limit being exceeded.

5.1.2 Company N elaar eview ard A Company Nuclear Reviev 3ca , composed of technically qualified persennel, has been appoin:ed to perfo independen: reviews of unit opera:1cn. The makeup of the Beard, spect' ca den of quorum and meeting frecuency are se:

forth in See:icn 5.0 of : e Uni 's Appendix "A" Techni:a1 Specift:ations.

~he 3 ard's independent .eview re pensibili:y will include all new or revised uni: envir:n=en:a1 pre edures, pro,esed changes or : modifications to unit struc:ures or ecuip: . :. reper:ed v clations of :he uni:'s Invir =en:a1 e:h-nical Specificati:r , proposed chang ec the uni:'s Invier.=en:a1 Te:hni:a1 Specift:ations, s ation opera: ion, an minutes of the Station Review Board ee:ing.

g 5.1.3 0 li:y Assurance Director j l

Tne Qual' v Assuracce Direct:r shall be resp mible f or verifica: ice of c e:lia e vi:h the Environmental Techni:a1 Sp :1!i:a:1:ns. Plannet period c reviews and audits will be conducted ac::::ance vi:5 :he pr:v- 1:ns of the qual::y assurance ror,ra= for .i: crera:ica des:rtbe:

in he uni:'s Tir.41 Saf ety Analysis Repert. *he cality Assuran:e

? rect:r shall also be responsible f:r revievina a.' n:nc:nferrance eper s :en:erning Invir:nnental Tecani:a1 Speci!1:a' i:ns in:1udi .g i

Orre::ive acti:ns :aken :o preven; any re:urreece of :he sa:e nen:enf:::an:e.

5.1-1 Amend:en: No. 2~

1 05-1 5.0 -

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTR0!.S i i

3.2 Action Co be taken in the svent of .olation of an Invironnenta' f hnical Specification.

5.2.1 Rem 1 action as permit by the unit's Environmental Technical' Speci cation shall be kan until the specification can be set. -)

5.2.2 Exceeding limi og condition for operation shall be investigated

~

by the inde e anc review and audit authority.

j 5.2.3 A repor for sa h occurance shall be prepared as specified la  !

see a 5.4.2.

N  !

i

{

5.2-1  !

/

M.

!.] AMINI 5;"u!!v! CCNTICt.5

5. Operating Procedures 5.3.1 *>ritten procedures or instructions, ine ding app 11:eble check lists and instructices, shall be prep ed and adhered to for all etivities, perfomed by Toledo Edi , involved in carrysag out tincl (Environmental Technical $Pecif cations. Proceduras vill be :gde sampling, instru=ent. calibration, analysis, and actions to aun when R_ni:s are ape;64ched er excseded. Tes: ng frtwen:7

! any %arns v:11 he :n:'.a< ed. These'frequen::es v:'; . be :eter-eined f reu experience vits similar instrus4nts in similar environ-nuts and i es unnf actdrers' technical manuals.  ;

Precadures sh4 epared for assuring the quality of the programs that a contracted t.o outside consultat.ts. Thase precadures sh ovide for audits to review procedures and to reviev and alua t e he program reports and results.

5.3.2 Unit op ating procedur which involve actions or operaticas whic could have an impac on the environment shall be identified.

Th a procedures shall in.: a previsions as necessary to ensure t the unit and all 1:s sy ens and components are operated in complianca .rith the unit's Inv ennental Technical Specifications.

5.3. All procedures described in 54eti 3.3.2, and all changes thereto vill be reviewed by the unit's Stat n Review Scard.

\

\

\

l' l

1

{-

l 1

5.3-1

DB-1

$.0 ADMINIST'RATIVE CONTR01.5

.4 . tJnit Reporting Requirements 5.4 1 Roucina Reporto A. ual Environmental Operatine Report Part A - radiological Report - A report on the any tonmental surveillance progrens for the previous 12 months of operatica s 1 be submitted to the Director of th NRC Regional Of fice '(vich a copy o the Director. Office of Nuclear Reactor agulation) as a ' separate doc at within 90 days after January 1 of each ear. The period of the f Ist report shall begin with the date of comoercl 1 operacion, . The re rt shall include descriptive sue::uries and prssen(t ion of results.

g veillance and study ac(t2 ities (Secti !..) available, of the special sur-

. sume.a ries. int erpre tations. and statistiemi evaluation of he resulj of the nonradiological environ ental surveillance activities (Se ion)) and the environn. ental :henitoring pro-grams required _by limiting co d tions for operation (Section 2) for the report period. including a erp rison with preoperational studies.. opera-tional controls (rs appro te) and previous environmental surveillance i r e po rt s a nd a n a s a s s se.e n l f the oo erved impacts of the unit operation '

~on the environment. the event c e some results are not available with-tnthe90dayperifo the report shall e submitted noting and explaining the reason for thy missing results. The issing data shall be submitted as soon as poes)ble in a supplementary re i

t. If harmful effects or evidente of ,irtaversible damage are detecte by the monitoring, the licensee shall prov}de an analysis of the probles and a reposed course of action 1 to allavta'te the probles.

t

/

/

/

i L I j 1 l  :

l.

1 l 1 5.4-1 Amendment No. 86 l -_____________J

1 4

DB-1

3. (Deleted) '

i i

j l

i l

i, i

'$.4.2 Nonreutine . ports A. Montoutine Inviren: nes! Oo_ rating Resorts A report shall be subsitte i che event that (a) a limiting condition for operation is exceeded (as sp, cified in Section 2 " Limiting Conditions for Operation"), or (b) an unu a or 1:portant event occurs that causes a sig-nificant environmental .act, hat af f ects potential enviro . mental t= pact fres unit operation, or hat has high public or potential public interese concerning environment 1 L: pact f om unit operation. Reports shall be sub-citted under the rep t schedule d cribed below:

1. Prompt R ort. Those events requiring prompt reports shall be repoped within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> b, telephone, telegraph, or f acsimile transmission to the rector of the itRC Regional Offi and within 10 days by a itten report to the Director of a Regional h'RC Office (with copy to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Tagulation).

2. 0-Day Report. Those events not requ ring prompt repores f shall be reported within 30 days by a itten report to the Director of the :aC Regional Office (vi a copy to the Director, j office of Nuclear P.eactor Regulation).

. e reporting schedule for reports concerning limiti conditions for paration specified in Section 2.4.1.a and Section 2. 3.a and in (b) atsvi sha11 be on the prompt schedule.

A endsent ! . //', 86

N

" D &-1

The sig - ciace of an unusual or apparently importan environment ent with regard to occurrence. In nuactmaynotbeobviousor.f)ul ppreciated at the time of in the licensee's assescess, the VILC shyabF informed promptly of char.ges report shall be sub itted as-toffe-1Tgnificenceoftheeventandacorrected diteuply as possible, s.

(ttle d) i c.

(Deleted) 5.4-3 Amendment t4o. 86 1

DB-1

$.4.3 Chance in Environmental Technical Specifica ions

f. A report hall be made to the NRC prior t lesentation of a change in nit or in procedures de-scribed in s h-(desten in unit ton 5.3 if the operatio change ef fect on the enN rennent ors invo}va/uld an environmental have a or matter significant cuestion net previ sly revievs Vand evaluated by the NRC. The report shall inchde description and evaluation of the change and a supporting benefit-cos aftalysis.

B. Recuest for changes be submitted to the) Director. 0: enviro (ental technical specifications shall 1 ce of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, for reviev and a(theorization. The aquest shall incluce an evalua-tion of the fr[vironnental impoet of t proposed change and a suppo rtingdene fitwost analysis.

3.4-4 knendeer.g_C%__S6 . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ,

+

e DB-1 3.0 ADHDi13TRATIVE CONT 10L3 i

Records Retantica 5.5. Records and logs relative to instrument cali ation and chemical

' analysis shall be retained for five years espt as described in i section 5.5.2.

5.5.2 Al records and logs relative to th following areas shall be reta ed for the life of the unit {

5.5.2.1 Recoqds and drawing cha. as reflecting unit design modifica-tions ude to systess ad equipment described in the unit's Envircabant:1 Repor .

5.5.2.2 N

Records of envy onsental monitoring surveys.

5.5.2.3 (Oelattd) x 5.5.2.6 Min as of Static vi.sv Board and Ccapany Nuclear Reviev ard meetings.

5.5.2.5 copias of all superseded operacias procedures which affect the environment.

/

i l

l l

l i

5.bl I

Amendment No.86

_-----_ _--_- _ __ _