ML20236R969

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attachment a to Standby Liquid Control Sys Control Capacity Equivalency Rept
ML20236R969
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/21/1987
From: Casey D, Earle R
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20236R958 List:
References
NEDC-87-153-ATT, NEDC-87-153-ATT-A, TAC-59084, NUDOCS 8711240141
Download: ML20236R969 (10)


Text

, . - _- - _

.3

c +
.;;

,' N c u c- ' 5 't - pJ

~ ..., ,,, ,

.. f. ' , . , k Ya g,f m gv1 h k ,

n <

, j g .

l

, p. -

i i

i

..a. a+ *. - - - .- .

... _ ..., ... l I>_. '

~ . . . - - - - . . . . - . - .,. -.

I x' , ;y , ,s .. . . - . . . - - - . . - ..a~ a .. - -.- .-. . -

p ' +  ;

'- PREPARED FOR NEBRASKA PUBLIC, POWER DISTRICT

- ,. u

.t.  ;

' b

, COOPER NUCLEAR STATION

- 1 e ,

d JULY 21,.1987  !

t' i

1, 1

l j

1 E6c/LI R 4.-

I PREPARED BY:' R. T. EARLE' l

+ a 1 1

%. 4. 2 VERIFIED BY: D. F. CAS - .

l

8711240141.871118 >

i PDR ADOCK 05000298.' )

, , P . PDR4 -

)

1 l

a .. -

RTE'87.01 t

't n , * . u'-_ -

, , y e o c '87- 153

'4.. A Huhme.,f k l l

DISCIAIMD1 OF RESPONSIBILITY I

- This' document was prepared by or for the General Electric Company. Neither the General Electric Company nor any of'the contributors to this document:

A. Makes any_ warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect t o~ the accuracy,- completeness, or usefulness of the information

't contained in this document, or that the use of any information disclosed in this document may not- Infringe privately owned rightst or, 6- B.

~

- Assumes any responsibility for liability or damage of any kind which l may result.from.the use of any information disclosed in this document.

1

= .

4 t

l l

1 i

l 1

_ _ _ _ , _ _ _ ___._m_mm------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - -

,,w- ,-

h. q:

, N E 0e ' 81. 153 b)9p2

? * - ,

hadmLE k

m. +ls h '

c: ,

                  -.o                                                                                                                             .j
               ' .g n                                                >L-w                                                                              . . . - - . .     ..- --

i .t m iThis document > was [ prepared for Nebraska Public Power Distri c t to address the x :n 4 Lminimum concentration. requirements of ~ the Standby Liquid Control System (SILS) h.

                                               'at the. Cooper Nuclear. Station. The plant specific values used to determine the
                                                . minimum SILS . sodium pentaborate solution. regtf rements are the same as the
                                               . minimum values provided in the system Technical. Specifications.

1 , .

                                               - This report uses L the revised procedures for demonstra, ting compliance with the NRC equivalentLeontrol capacity concept. The plant-specific parameters used in

%;u.

                                                ..the analysis are minimum values rather than the nominal values'that were used in f ,, ' :l ,      s.
                                               .the' original: concept-derivation.

t {4 I

                 /$k                                                                                                                                ,

.i, f s ., <

                                  .'I-
] ,

1 4 q (.. 5

                    >         j.
(;

I v

                           '                      Y 3 J,                                                                        __________________O
                      '- -                                                                     a,  .f-  .J'-

J ./ [+ / $ , ' '- '. , ' I T. ., ,:.: , f/."4 ,g+h,

                                                                                                             ,                                     ' ' ',                                   y
                                                                                                                                                                                                 ~           '

JR, g, .- . zg.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ;})EOc. 8~l-}g3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                )

hh h ,? f, ',' ' k} }sch~ rd k. ) ,w x , <.

                             ~ r                                                                                 -                                                                    .

..V +. . < : " [;%/f,,1r,4.L ,s

      .u                                             ,                    ,,                                                        .,
m. . . s.._ . .o ,
                                    ,                                   ._.y                                                                                                ,

i t> l"c .);; u 1 I

                                                                  ;                                                                                                                                                                                                                 i

.SSO k., s pga4c,gg- i L , V4 @(' TABLE OF CONITNTS @- f= .

1. ,.

@ ~ 103 , c < 3

                ,$'i'                  , y,                   ' !                                                                                                                                                                                                               !
     ,               ;. ; p;
                     , . m_               '

y- . w ' '< p 3

                                                                                        ,3..
                                                                                     .. e s i

nG; r

             * < .. s                                                          ii                                                                      o                                            -

l

    #;_, , : ~
        +!                                ;                                ,         l                                                                                                                                                                       Page m                                                                                                              ,                        ,

s,. .. 't f

         ,r h-.iI'f s         s' s                                              ;;.
m. .

ABS'!11ACP 'Ii 3.- (

                           ; ,a ., .

r

        ,        y                                                           , ,                              a r                                                                            s
                           , s.                                                                                                                <                                                                    - *
                                    'e                  f W',}' ,'                                                           >

y :1g , INTRODUCrlON '

  • 1-1 l

1 '~,_

                                                                                                  , l'
             ;;p,                                      my..                                                              3                                         ,                          y l

i

                   ,. >                                                         k , ,., '.                                                                 ,          ,

X< j

                                                                                                                   ,,3, . DISCUSSION 3

_2-1

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              .)
+ ~                                                        ."3.',,.,

a . + J i.

2.1' Sif System Design Basis m 3 f,.i .

2-1 . a  !

                                                                        -t-l 3                                                 ,,
                                                                        < ~

J2.2 NRC A'IWS 'Ru1e 2-1

                                                                                   -m      '
                           %                    {
                                                                                                                   ~

V .y,T - ,.- 3 .' . ANALYSISL 3-1 t b 1

" t l
                 ,,,e

[ T'-"

                                                                                                               )

g

a. ,
              %1 3               4           , ,

1

  • t f .

9

       .y
               .K. :.
                               .'                                                                                   1
     '                                                   -e
  • l 2
         )                                            &

l A i e A t N '.

                                                  -l                                                                                                                                                                              ,

F a.' y. l [

  ;.    ,ty j p , ;.. ' q f.

t - c ,- 1

                                                                                                                                                             ' + '

a i

$g'li;;l.y bE ON Ol'ISI' p gg I. $ ,

,m ga j 1
                            - ,,                1       0                                                                    J* '

l ' ::t - tc.?4 c e? Lt . : L IRITGUCTION D ' g t! ;j. 1 n- ,i

                                                                ! Netiraska'

}@fN 7 '

                                        ^
                                                                                                             . Pubile. Power.? District - has. . requested - an ' evaluat ion of the. minimum Qs b,

Trequired ; concentration (weight. percent): of sodium . pentaborate . for the Cooper A. - Standby? Liquid . Cont rol L.Syst em. - The minimum concentration is to be . based. on- [p ' , 1 m y equivalency to the 86 gpm,:13-weight percent sodium pentaborate control capacity requirement 1. stated _ iri, the NFC A1WS rule '10CFR50.62. ~ Equivalency is calculated. y , J'

.LusingLthe ratio:of specific' Cooper minimum values'to. reference plant values that  ;

x > ~: the rule!!s based on.~

                         'we 3                               x. .

y? , ForDCooper;4a minimum concentration.of 11.5' percent'is required. This is-based. m . J 7. d ., , : onithe assumptions ' thatL the. actual pump capacity'. Is equal to or exceeds the . R.$?

total? min.imum pump? flow rate'.and ' the enrlehment of the sodium pentaborate. has b~ , . ..

1 Enot; changed.. "Also, it 9is assumed ' that : thef standby liquid control system has

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       .i 1

been properly modified.forftwo' pump operat' ion. 9; m .. '

                  .x                                                                                            ,

i

        ;i hk Ik.             s l

5 .. ,  ! 4 .

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      .i
,;m                                                                                   *

' f . ,' . . .: 4. ; t 6 j . . .: 4: -: s s

  . -                                                       1 i

g ;) ,

                                                                           ' ~

R $ .h , , d: G

         ,()

b _J-'.,'

           ':.l.
   'l
   ._     , ~

.-s

i. . , 1-1 n, o; Off

l

      %g:x
y,? . ' '
                                                                                                                  ;,;                                             blE06 A7d/S3 s                 '

kNoh n V k ; _ .,4, n.:q , ygy'y'ggyggggy; g l &l 7, b&, m m 12;1G SIC System Design Basis Qh r.r u.i s

                                                                                                                                                                                                               'l, U.           .

lf gy " 1The generic. design basis for the SIC system is to provide a specified cold boron i I 4:; m #d9 1 b -'shutdowniconcentrationlt'o.th'e reactor vessel (described in NEDE 24222). The SIC f,' - .: r 5;.,1systemNatypicall'yjdesignedtoprovide.thespecifiedcoldshutdownconcentra-A) l d.i ., N tlon:. In jab'out - one . or: two L ho' u rs. . During. reload. licensing evaluations this l e.. ,l shutdown concent'rSilon;is verified by analysis to be adequate to render. the core s-i suberitical.: The; considerations in the reload evaluation are independent of-

            ', a ATWS and'lhjestion rate is not'directly considered.

h! - - - ThelA1WS rule' required addition:of!a new design requirement to the generic.SIE x f s sys t em1 design l basis., Changes Lto ' flow rate, solution concentration or boron ' t g&

                                                                       .. . .                                                                                                                                   i
enrichment ,, toi meet J the 4 ATWS . Rul e , must not - Invalidate the original design l
                  , c. :. ,                            ' tias i s'.
               +           s
                                                                                                       ., ,                                                                                                     i o           ,7-                                2.2 :: NRC A1MS Rule
                                  ,_ (l           ' '
        \                                   '
Paragraph 7(c)(4) of:10CFR50.62 states,. in parts i i
                                                                               '"Each l bol_Ilng l water . reactor must have - a standby liquid . cont rol system                                               i
                                                                            .'(SIG)'wlth:a minimum flow capacity and boron content equivalent in control
                                                                                'capact ty[to,86. gallons l per minute of 13-welght ' percent sodium pentaborate
                                                                                'solutlon."                                   $
The NRCj Staff has provided clarlficatlon- of equivalent control capactty

[(Reference 7)ss.follows:

                                                           '(!)?Thk " equivalent ~1n control- capacity" wording was                                           chosen              to allow
                       ,                                                            flexibility ' to the Implementat ton of the requirement.                  For example, the J equivalence can be obtained by increasing flow rate, boron concentration or                                                                !
  • y boron' enrichment.

m,  ;

                                 ,j.

y # lh, (

                               ;                                                           ..                                       2-1 f                 $

g w '.. . . ; j e

                                                                *b m                                                                        '
                                                                                                                                                                . _ _ _ _ _     _______________________________o

7,, zy , g ll Y'l h 61-IS3

                                                                                                                        .           O G 0 C-gq.;                                                                                                                                )$ H n h e d A g'                                                     ,                                 ,

h ;'. 4 .. .> . > . ~ gj;;Y.". . (2).--The a86 gallons: per : minute and ,13-weight percent: sodium pentaborate-were 4'

'[
                                                                ; values used'in NEDE-24222, " Assessment of BWil Mi tigation of A'IWS, . Volumes I i+       :

and-11," December.1979, for BWil/4, BWR/S and BWR/6 plants with'a 251-inch. T ..)? ji. ' vessel 'inside ' diameter. That different values would be equivalent for pg - . smaller plants was recognized in NEDE-24222: 9n.

    ., :-           m                                       ,

Q ,' + ,

                                                                           "The" flow rates: given here are normalized from a 251-inch diameter y                                                                         Lvessel pirat~ to a .218-inch diameter vessel plant, i.e., the 66 gpm;
                                                                   ,      . control ~ liquid injection rate in a 218 is equivalent to 8? gpm in a-              !

251. This Is done to bound the a Miss!s... (pp. 2-15 [NEDE-24222])."  !

                                                 ..(3)             The .important parameters to consider in establishing equivalence are vessel M                                                       boron.concentrationLrequired'to achieve shutdown and the time required to c

a'hieve that vessel boron concentration. The minimally acceptable system should 'show. an equivalence in these parameters to the 251-inch diameter vessel studied in NEDE-24222. 0

'h a
               \
                                                     '9 e

J 2-2

        . .. y                                                                                                                                                     i
                             -4__.-. _ _ . , _ .                       __

y . o ... e , , l'?{q'li *x , W & G oc. g7,pgy I ts , y . i

                                                          ' I.

s !l .(.. , h k;, ,j , '53 3 ANALYSIS .N

                                                                                                                                                    .                                                                    1 4                '

Thel NRC equivalent control, capact ty ~ concept of E the A'IWS rule is a' very . simple, . ]

 -                                                                                                                      s                                                                                                 .;
                                          ~ direct : criterion. It' . Is; not~ necessary ' to consider mixing etficiency or. to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         '4 3<

o d account.for plant-specific core nuclear characteristics, i 4 3

               '                                                                                                                                                                              'e
  • l
                    ,           <         l Consequently', Cooper can dempnstrat'e: compliance withsthe equivalency requirement                                                                                                I j

y; W fi f.[thelfollowing/re'lationship.is shown'to be true: , a;

                                                           ;4 b,. . .                                                                       M
                                                                                   'q: 2511 C'                    E"'
                                                                                ' T E.:. , T ,..T T . ,.Tir.T >' 1                                      1)

I ' - (where the plant-specific parameters are defined as,. l

               ~

w

Q.
                                                                                    =-         minimum SICS flow rate.(one-pump:or two-pump as appropriate), gpm                                                       .

fj < mass.of water in the reactor vessel and recirculation system at a lM- .-= the hot rated condition,?lbs-I i

                              %                                     LCS            E=-     1 minimum sodlum pentaborate~ solution concentration, weight percent
    .-m '                                          
                                                                    .. E ..         .=.     . minimum expected B10" isotope'entichment'(19.8% for natural
                                                            ^

bor'on)',4 atom percent g iThe' value of M251 (the: mass of water. In the: reactor. vessel and recirculation j system atirated conditions in the reference plant) is.628,300 lbs for a 251-inch .

       ~T                                   : diameter el3WR/3/4~. (Reference 1);- This value- was ' calculated based on rated                                                                                            -{

temperature, rated void content, normal water: level, control rods fully wl.thdrawn, . expected minimum vessel . dimensions and nominal vessel internals dimensions.  !

     ,                                                                                                                                                                                                                     1
             *                                    .. Based on a; plant specific 'elculation of M, the Cooper Plant contains 489,993                                                                                          J pounds.of water-(Reference 8).

I g i 1, d

               ,            ;                                                                                                                                                                                                i
 .                                                                                                                              3-1   ,

r <"'-............. .

w: , (Q .L,e g +' " wh

                                                                                                                                 . N & D C-I ' 83 -I S3 0 j                                                             -

g

                                                                                                                                                  ;j           l d          ;                                                          ,                       ,.

@  :/ g , '

% X<

<y The:m NRC D requires c the: use.iof. minimum plant-specific' values toH demonstrate E ' compilan'ce with the1 equivalency; requirement.: Based on equatlon 1) with-natural - l ;bs on enrichment,-(the. ratio of--E/19.8 is equal to'one) Copper can demonstrate compila'nce'If the following. relationship is trues 7 ;.g Q, ^ M

                                                                 'C > 13 T* 86 *-

ji ;Q", 628,300'

                                                                         ~

1

                                                                        - J
                                                  .                                                       >a

%y h,t Lwhere C inithis-:cas'e Is the:-minimum concentration (weight per cent) of sodlum j.;7 ," pekta' borate; and [Q j is the'... minimum allowed total. pump . flow rate (2 pumps

%                                       Loperating). The . minimum fallowed' total pump " flow 'ratc, as obtained from (Reference'6                 'E ls 2lx 38.2 = 76.4 gpm.-      ~
                     ~'

%<- Usingithe current. Cooper. plant-specific values in'Eq'uation 2) gives a regulred-

                                         , minimum,concentr'ation oft 11.5. weight' percent.. sodium pentaborate.

w S i 13 *' '86' '* _489,993

                                                                 ~C.>

L ,, 2 x 38.2: 628,300.- h  ; ,Ci>.'11.412s11.5' - i a When;the; concentration.ls egual to or greater than 11.5 percent, Cooper meets or exceeds < the' NRC_ A'IWS rule equivalency requirements.

                                        'The:same equation can be>used'to determine the minimum total pump flow rate for.                                     =

afminimum' concentration.of 13.0 weight percent. 9 L , f i -Q> 13 * !M

  • 86. l
  '                                                        L                 E ~C          M
                              ,                                                              251 Q > .13
  • 489,993
  • 86 i
                          ,                                                 ~ E .628,300 g                                                   4 (Q > 67.07 m 67.1 gm At af minimum concentration equal to or greater than 13 percent, and a minimum L           y.                              totali pump ' flow of .67.1 gpm, Cooper meets or exceeds the NRC A'IWS rule
                                        ; equivalency requirements.                                                                                     t
 .o                               ,

9 l .f; , 3-2

                          = _ _ _ _ _ . _                    _                - -
   . r . .y n y e oc.                      87-1s3' (l'.n g ,.

jy s.w 1 A / /, d ,,,q p g c , .,

4. REFERENCES

{1l.- ' NEDE. ' 31096 - P, Response to NRC A'IWS Rule,10CFR50.69,, Dec.1985. p: ,; .

                                                                        ~

Y 2. gfS/N 275296, Union Pump . Pump Performance Data k, , 3.l lS/N 275297, Union Pump

  • Pump Performance Data

, a .. ,

                    ;l' 3,--

( 4. , 10CFR50.62, NRC A'IWS Rute, June' 1984

                        .p o

1 5.- 'NEDN-24222, . As'sessment of BWR Mitigat ion of A'IWS, December -1979 t

6. 22A2896AB, SICS Design Spec Data Sheet
  .+.g-
                                                              .~_

E' - 7 .- : USN11C Generic Leiter 85-03, Clarification of Equivalent Control Capacity T. , .

                                                     .for Stand y Liquid Sistems, January 28, 1985..
8. - NEDC-30857, Cooper A'Ih5 Assessment , Dec.1984.

1 4

                                                                                                                                                                       )

q.. 1 i t t . 1 ><4 j l 4-1

         $                                                                                           _              . - -              -a. a,_--.--.u-_-_-a._-}}