ML20236F299
| ML20236F299 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1987 |
| From: | Sylvester E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TAC-64910, TAC-64911, NUDOCS 8708030286 | |
| Download: ML20236F299 (5) | |
Text
-
July 30 1987 2
Docket Nos. 50-325/324 DISTRIBUTION tDocket File 3 ACRS(10)
Mr. E. E. Utley NRC & Local PDRs Senior Executive Vice President PD21 r/f Power Supply and Engineering & Construction S. Varga Carolina Power & Light Company G. Lainas P. O. Box 1551 P. Anderson Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 E. Sylvester OGC-B 4
Dear Mr. Utley:
E. Jordan i
J. Partlow i
SUBJECT:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3.0.3 AND 3.0.5 - PROPOSED LICENSEE l
AMENDMENT 86TSB18 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1AND 2 (TACS 64910 and 64911)
By letter dated March 2,1987, you submitted an application to revise Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.5.
These proposed amendments involve changes to the definition of OPERABLE in Section 1.0 and 3.8.1.1 and the BASES sections, as well as Sections 3.0.3 and 3.0.5.
In our review of this amendment application, we find that we need the information requested in the enclosure to complete our review.
Please respond to this request within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, k
Ernest D. Sylvester, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page i
%OBogp[fgg [,
P b 02[:DRPR LA:PD21:DRPR PM:PD21:DRPR PAnderson @r ESylvester/dsf EAddnsam
- g 7/rs/87 7/f 87 7/19/87
(
1 1
)
July 30 1987 0
i Docket Nos. 50-325/324 DISTRIBUTION
)
Docket File ACRS (10) l Mr. E. E. Utley NRC & Local PDRs l
l Senior Executive Vice President PD21 r/f Power Supply and Engineering & Construction S. Varga Carolina Power & Light Company G. Lainas
'f P. O. Box 1551 P. Anderson Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 E. Sylvester OGC-B
Dear Mr. Utley:
E. Jordan J. Partlow
SUBJECT:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS 3.0.3 AND 3.0.5 - PROPOSED LICENSEE l
AMENDMENT 86TSB18 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1AND 2 (TACS 64910 and 64911)
By letter dated March 2,1987, you submitted an application to revise Brunswick l
Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2, Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.6.
These proposed amendments involve changes to the definition of OPERABLE in t
l Section 1.0 and 3.8.1.1 and the BASES sections, as well as Sections 3.0.3 and l
l 3.0.5.
In our review of this amendment application, we find that we need the l
information requested in the enclosure to complete our review.
Please respond to this request within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under 4
P.L.96-511.
Sincerely, k
Ernest D. Sylvester, Project Manager Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
See next page l
LA:PD21:DRPR PM:PD21:DRPR S
DRPR PAnderson @ g ESylvester/dsf EAde'nsam 7/ z.9/87 7/ ; 4 87 7/19/87
\\
Mr. E. E. Utley Brunrwick Steam Electric Plant Carolina Power & Light Company Units 1 and 2 CC*
Mr. P. W. Howe Mr. C. R. Dietz Vice President Plant General Manager Brunswick Nuclear Project Brunswick Nuclear Project Box 10429 Box 10429
)
Southport, North Carolina 28461 Southport, North Carolina 28461 Thomas A. Baxter, Esquire Mr. H. A. Cole Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Special Deputy Attorney General 2300 N Street, N.-W.
State of North Carolina Washington, D. C.
20037 Post Office Box 629 i
Raleigh, North Carolina '27602 Mr. D. E. Hollar Associate General Counsel Mr. Robert P. Gruber Carolina Power & Light Company Executive Director Post Office Box 1551 Public Staff - NCUC Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Post Office Box 29520 Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0520 Mr. Christopher Chappell, Chairman Board of Commissioners Post Office Box 249 3
Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 1
Mrs. Chrys Baggett State Clearinghouse Budget and Management 116. West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Star Route 1 Post Office Box 208 Southport, North Carolina 28461 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Chief Radiation Protection Branch Division of Facility Services N. C. Department of Human Resources 701 Barbour Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2008
ENCLOSURE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING A TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT RE0 VEST DATED MARCH 2, 1987 BRUNSWICK UNITS 1 AND 2 1.
Specification 3.0.5 requires that all redundant systems, subsystems, trains, components, and devices must be operable while the proposed action items a2 and b2 for Specification 3.8.1.1 reduces this requirement from all redun-dant systems to caly systems associated with one division that depend on the remaining offsite circuit or diesel generator as a source of power.
Provide a justification for reducing the requirements of specification 3.0.5.
2.
When one offsite circuit is inoperable, the licensee has proposed to change action item a2 of Specification 3.8.1.1 such that only one diesel generator not currently running need be verified operable versus all four diesel gen-erators.
Provide justification for the proposed change.
3.
Action items a2, b2, c1, dl, and el of Specification 3.8.1.1 require df esel generators to be started and load tested. The licensee's proposed change removes the load test part of this requirement. Justify the elimination of load testing.
4.
The definition included as part of action b of Specification 3.8.1.1 for the length of time a diesel generator must be considered inoperable has been removed.
Provide justification.
5.
The term " required" has been added to action items bl and c4 of Specifica-tion 3.8.1.1 to describe the two A.C. offsite sources. Describe the purpose and justification for adding the term.
1 6.
Action items c3 and c4 of Specification 3.8.1.1 have been combined and the first sentence of action items c3, c4, d3, and e3 of Specification 3.8.1.1 have been removed.
Describe the purpose and justification for the proposed changes.
7.
The requirements to go to cold shutdown within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after reaching Hot Shutdown has been removed from action item d2 of Specification 3.8.1.1 Justify the removal of this requirement.
8.
In action item el of Specification 3.8.1.1, the term " power sources" has been replaced with the term " circuits."
Provide justification for this change.
1 i
i 1
1 l
!