Text

Rev 5 to Ultrasonic Insp of Statically Cast Stainless Steel Elbow at Trojan Nuclear Power Plant
	ML20236B137
Person / Time
Site:	Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date:	07/01/1987
From:	Dykes E, Kusy R, Zhang Y; AMDATA, INC. (SUBS. OF COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC.)
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20236B080	List: ML20236B077; ML20236B097; ML20236B137;
References
	IR252, IR252-R05, IR252-R5, TAC-65315, NUDOCS 8707280356
	Download: ML20236B137 (175)
	v • d • e

-

s j

k Doc urrien t Control Desk ,

Trojan Nuclear Plant July 24, 1987 l Docket 50-344 Attachment I f j

License NPF-1 ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF A STATICALLY CAST i STAINLESS STEEL ELBOW-AT THE TROJAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Prepared for i PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Prepared by AMDATA,NC.

AMDATA R252 b0

$$$!k $ So$ho p

l

ULTRASONIC INSPECTION

OF A STATICALLY CAST STAINLESS STEEL ELBOW AT THE TROJAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Prepared for PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY Prepared by AMDATA, INC.

a IR252

_ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - . _ . _ _ _ _ __________...m__-__.-____ _-_ _

L.

i

(.

ULTRASONIC INSPECTION l .'

OF A STATICALLY CAST STAINLESS STEEL ELBOW AT THE l

l TROJAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT l

l

)

Prepared by L Edward R. Dykes

[ Yingda Zhang Richard Kusy

Brian Smith l'

AMDATA, INC.

" A Subsidiary of' Combustion Engineering, Inc.

775 Montague Expressway c 1: -Milpitas,' California 95035-6815 i I

I

! O Prepared for l PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY L Trojan Nuclear Power Plant 71760 Columbia River Highway

) Rainier, Oregon 97048 1

r j

j. July 1, 1987 )

1

- Rev. - 5, 7/1/87 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 I

_ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - )

1 l

)

l

)

LIST OF EFFECTIVE-PAGES 1 1 '

Revision Page

) 5 Cover page i

}. 5 i through vi 4 1 and 2 l

) 5 3 l 4 4 through 8 5 9 4 10 through 36 5 37 4 38

\ '1 e l l !

i

?

,I i

I 1

l I

l l Rev. 5, 7/1/87 i Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 .

l 1

.. . 4 p

V k

p.-

I APPROVAL L

for release of the report on the k ULTRASONIC INSPECTION OF A STATICALLY CAST STAINLESS STEEL ELBOW

1. AT THE TROJAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

\

l r

1 Cognizant UT Level III Richard Kusy f Senior Engineer '

Yingda Zhang 3.

Approved for. Release ,

u Edward R. es f

i l

) )

[

i I

1. l 1

}. .

p

).

Rev. 5, 7/1/87 11 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l

)

l Y

?

ACKNOWLEDGMENT Yi (Peter) - H. - Jeong, Research Scientist at the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Nondestructive Evaluation Center in Charlotte,. North. Carolina, participated in both the field and report' preparation phases-of the' Trojan statically cast stainless steel (SCSS) elbow inspection program. In particular, he is_ responsible'for the bandpass filtering results contained in this report.

Arlen Wogen,' Don Williams and other Portland General Electric personnel provided excellent support for the Amdata field crew.

Their outstanding planning allowed the inspection to commence and proceed on schedule.

Dr. Soung-Nan Liu of EPRI has provided substantial support for Amdata's work"with SCSS and centrifugally cast stainless steel

. (CCSS) materials.

J 4

{

i-

)

k:

l Rev. 5, 7/1/87 iii Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l l

SUMMARY

1 I

An ultrasonic volumetric examination of the hot-leg elbow in Loop B of the primary coolant system was conducted at the Trojan Nuclear Power plant during the 1987 refueling outage. This work was performed between April.2 and April 12, 1987. Amdata, Inc., a subsidiary of Combustion Engineering, Inc., performed the exami-nation using the Intraspect/98 Ultrasonic Imaging System.- Some l manual ultrasonic (UT) work was also performed to support and l confirm the automated UT data analysis results.

The IntraSpect/98 system detected seven indications in the elbow.

Two of them are volumetric rid-wall reflectors and five are on or very near the inside diameter (ID) surface.

There is no indication that the mid-wall reflectors are connected to the ID surface. Each is estimated to be less than 0.3 inch in length and probably are inclusions that have arisen from the original manufacturing process and are not stress related.

)

The indications on or very near the ID surface are small. Their

> origins are unknown and cannot be determined from the UT data.

The signal reflections from the ID indications imply that they are planar reflectors. Possible causes for these indications are

)

small stress-related ID cracks, sharp indications and scratches or gouges made by a tool or metal part.

The maximum length of the largest of the ID indications is approximately 1.0 inch as measured from the display on the

> IntraSpect/98. Taking into account the ultrasonic beam width at the ID surface, the actual physical length of each of these

reflectors is estimated to be less than 0.3 inch, a small fraction of the circumference of the elbow.

The precise through-wall extent of the ID indications cannot be l cpecified. However, the small lengths suggest little i penetration, which is expected to be less than 0.3 inch.

> A summary of the seven indications is provided in the following

{ table. Indications 1 through 5 are on or very near the ID curface. The nominal wall thickness of the elbow is 3.375 inches. Indications 6 and 7 are the mid-wall reflectors.

)

Rev. 7/1/87 f 5, iv Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1

SUMMARY

OF. INDICATIONS

[ .Indi-

. cation' Form Location *

} -I/98 TOF Depth cNumber Hama Tape X (in) Y (in) (usec) (inches) Amo(%) Notes F

[ 1 : SET +8 UT-2 11.0-12.0 0.4 52.25 3.39 100.0 ID**

3 o' clock I 2 SET +16 UT-3 3.5-4.5 0.8 53.40 3.48 100.0 ID 5

9 o' clock L 3 SET +16 UT-3 5.75-6.25 0.9 53.40 3.48 69.3 ID L 9 o' clock 4 SET +17 UT-3 7.75-8.75 2.2 54.75 3.60 82.7 ID o

L 9 o' clock 5 SET +18 UT-3 8.5-9.25 1.2 52.20 3.38 85.0 ID

!' 9 o' clock l

6 SETR+4 UT-4 11.3 2.75 36.15 2.03 100.0 270 t to 3.50 mid-wall

( 9 o' clock 7

7 SETR+9 UT-5 12.6 4.25 27.65 1.32 100.0 90 U i to 5.25 mid-wall L

3 o' clock I

These. coordinates refer to the dimensions relative to the scan

) patterns shown on the elbow in Figures 7.1-1 through 7.1-4.

- 0n or very.near the inside diameter surface.

>~

The current examination results constitute a baseline. Future examinations using the-Intraspect/98 can be compared with the r images obtained in this inspection to determine if the j indications are growing. Indication number 1 exhibits the most ;

significant signal characteristics and, as a minimum course of '

action, it should be reexamined in 1988.

L !

i- I i-

) ,

} -.

Rev. 5, 7/1/87 v Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l

k CONTENTS Section P_iLqq

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1 2.0 SURFACE CONDITIONS AND RADIATION LEVELS 1 2.1 SURFACE CONDITIONS 1 2.2 RADIATION LEVELS 2 3.0 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION 2 4.0 WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS 3 l 5.0 ATTENUATION MEASUREMENTS 5 l

6.0 MANUAL UT EXAMINATION 6 7.0 INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATED UT EXAMINATION 8 7.1 DETECTION OF INDICATIONS S 7.2 --POST-INSPECTION SIGNAL PROCESSING 15 8.0 RADIOGRAPHS OF ELBOW 36

9.0 CONCLUSION

S AND RECOMMENDATIONS 36

10.0 REFERENCES

38 i

APPENDIX A HISTORY OF THE HOT-LEG ELBOW PROBLEM A-1 APPENDIX B DATA SHEETS B-1 APPENDIX C INTRASPECT/98 CALIBRATION BLOCK RESULTS C-1 AND IMAGES l

> APPENDIX D SKETCHES OF THE ELBOW AND CALIBRATION BLOCK D-1 l APPENDIX E INTRASPECT/98 SETUP FORMS FOR CALIBRATION E-1 l AND INSPECTION I AFPENDIX F TRANSDUCER CERTIFICATIONS F-1 AFPENDIX G AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC INSPECTION PROCEDURE G-1 FOR STATICALLY AND CENTRIFUGALLY CAST l' STAINLESS STEEL PIPING AND PIPING i- COMPONENTS, AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 861224 y APPENDIX H I.NTRASPECT/98 SYSTEM TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION H-1 j APPENDIX I PERSONNEL CERTIFICATIONS I-1 l APPENDIX J LIST OF INTRASPECT/98 DATA TAPES AND J-1 '

THE FILES THEY CONTAIN APPENDIX K EXPLANATION OF INTRASPECT/98 B-SCAN LEGENDS K-1 APPENDIX L LENGTH CORRECTION DUE TO BEAMWIDTH L-1 Rev. 5, 7/1/87 vi Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

L An ultrasonic examination of the hot-leg elbow in Loop B of the primary coolant system was conducted at the. Trojan Nuclear Power Plant during the 1987 refueling outage. Trojan is operated by Portland General Electric (PGE). This work was performed April 2 through April 12,.1987 by Amdata, Inc., a subsidiary of i

. Combustion Engineering, Inc., using the IntraSpect/98 Ultrasonic l Imaging System.

1 1

A recent investigation of the B reactor coolant loop (RCL) at Trojan indicated that the hot-leg elbow could have experienced d maximum strain and loading conditions due to restrained thermal !

ernansion of the RCL (1 and 2). This is possible under the steam 1 generator snubber lock-up condition. Functional deterioration of 1

' the steam generator snubber was evidenced during the initial investigation of the RCL. Consequently, PGE decided to perform an ultrasonic examination of the B. hot-leg elbow to determine L

whether stress-related defects had developed.

Emphasis was given.to examining the pipe inside surface (ID). )

The areas of. prime interest are the 3-o' clock and 9-o' clock s

l regions (side faces) of the elbow (see Figures 7.1-1 and 7.1-2). :

The regions to be scanned were determined by PGE based on EPRI's j experimental analysis.of the elbow component under presumed i stress and loading conditions.- (Previously, Impell Corporation ;

performed a finite element analysis on the same elbow, however, the hot stress locations were different from EPRI's results). A history of the problem is summarized in Appendix A.

L l

2.0 SURFACE CONDITIONS AND RADIATION LEVELS L 2.1 ' SURFACE CONDITIONS L

The outside diameter (OD) surface of the elbow is relatively J F smooth compared with other cast components. Some difficulties

(_ were experienced in mounting the scanner track during the data

-acquisition. This was mainly due to the curvature of the elbow.

Local uneven surface waviness also caused minor coupling problems j for larger transducers (the-2-1/2" x 2-1/2" and 3-1/2" x 2" sizes).

1 l

t

[ Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

2;2 RADIATION LEVELS-

A O.11R/Hr field was recorded at general -areas near the elbow, j and 0.15 R/Hr at surface' contact. Individual radiation exposure {

Eduring data acquisition is as follows:

Peter.Jeong ~0.5 R -

Richard Kusy 1.0'R L Brian Smith 1.18 R Yingda Zhang 0.03 R A total' radiation exposure of 2.71 R was received by the UT per-sonnel for completing the scanning of one elbow, which included ;

four-direction automatic and manual scans at the 3-o' clock and )

9-o' clock elbow sections. d 3.0 EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION l

The. statically cast stainless steel calibration block used was

'the same one described in Attachment F of the referenced letter (A) and is repeated as follows:

L i

"The calibration block used in the UT examination of the-elbow was supplied by Westinghouse in 1977 as part.of ISI I contract commitments. The material composition is shown in

)

the attached test report for Calibration Standard SN 1

-(Enclosure 4 to this. attachment). The calibration standard material is A351-CF8M. The calibration standard was fabricated in accordance with ASME Section XI with three holes drilled into the side of !

j the block.. Each of these holes are 3/16 inch in diameter, and are located at the 1/4T, 1/2T, and 3/4T positions. j The elbow material specified on the '

i

) isometrics (RC-2501R-1-1, RC-2501R-1-2, RC-2501R-1-3, and RC-2501R-1-4) is A351-CF8M. A copy of the elbow material >

specification is provided as Enclosure 5 to this attachment.

l The elbows were fabricated by ESCO, Portland, Oregon." ,

The sketch of this calibration block is shown'in Appendix D.

Note that, in addition to the three side drilled holes, a !

[- circumferential raw'saw cut notch is made on the ID surface.

! The calibrations performed of calibration on this UT instruments block(manual and automatic) in accordance with thewere I

standard ASME Code (horizontal linearity and scanning sensitivity setup). The calibration results are shown in Appendix C.

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 2 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 .

n i 4.0 WALL THICKNESS MEASUREMENTS 3 l

l JL. Panametrics Epoch 2002 manual UT instrument with a Panametrics 1 MHz,.1-inch-diameter, normal-beam transducer was used for wall thickness measurements. The allowable variations in wall thicknesses per the specifications is from.2.17" to 4.40". 'The nominal wall thickness of the hot-leg elbow-in loop B is 3.375".

Thicknesses in the.9-o' clock region of the elbow vary from 3.23"'to 4.13" as shown in Figure 4-1.

i

.The horizontal linearity was calibrated on the calibration block with the effective thickness range of 0.69" to 2.75" (1/4T.SDH depth = 0.69"; calibration block thickness = 2.75").

Measured values outside the calibrated effective range of the instrument are approximate. ,

1 l

l 5

I-

)

[-

I Rev. 5, 7/1/87 Page 3 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

l N Rc1 0% PFK $#1 R F d Ge.6%e - 14.2d 0.475 iu0!V FF 91 0 4 29.14 0.475tv0!V 0 . . . . .1 00 . .

3 3c .. , ,

. : : ~

g

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...... g............... ..

g . . .:.... :. . :... ." ...: 4 '....:...'........J .

20 . . : . . . . : . . . . : . . . ...:..... .:. . . . .. . . . : . 20 : . . . . : . . . . : . . . . ... :. .:.. .. :

O nn .m' in nn! 0 ,. _.J L n8 a. in ,

' -in a a.ga in ,

(0.) (f)

"N '

REJ 0% - EW M010RY RU 0% -

P54KME!GY R F 53.0 A - ti.8A 0.475i RF 53.0 A - 0.475 i V 0 , . .- '

G .. .

is'c

.g .

g ...

. . A- . .

e

' j.

4 .g ,0 4

.. . . n s- . . .

. ; 5 . : .

e "n?

.r. .. i 20 ................ ...... .% 20 . . . . . . . . 2.g

( [ 'pi ,j ' '4

. -f e .i %,,'i.,2,

,, r:sn a 4.n sn .

. <-. o;.h ; .' . a.

r v.,- .

(C) (0 t$s it'.v EW E$)RY WJ

0.475 V

.M , . #1 7 .

l -

?.' r : \

aa !,

g ..-

g l .p .

'.40 ug:. e. .

r 3 .,g- .-

, s 20 r.

j .s.,

\

i .

a , a i n ;, ,

"4, Ce)

[ Figure 4-1. Wall Thickness Measurements in the

} 9-O' Clock Region of the Hot-Leg Elbow Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 4 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

i 5.0- ATTENUATION MEASUREMENTS It.was difficult to measure representative attenuation (in terms of.dB, reduction per unit sound path) in coarse-grained cast .

l

.ctainless steel because of considerable variations in local grain {

offects:and wall thickness (5). Therefore, a range of the signal 1

'emplitude variation (backwall echo) was recorded. Twelve (12) measurements were made over the inspection area of the elbow j I- using a Panametrics, Epoch 2002. A 1-MHz Panametrics transducer 4

(1 inch'in diameter, S/N 48160) was used. The results are 1 summarized in-Table 5-1. The recorded values in dB are the gain j settings for bringing up the-backwall echo (BWE) to 80%. full screen height (FSH) on the instrument CRT screen. Local varia-tions.in: signal amplitude of approximately 15 dB were observed

'during the examination.

Table 5-1 BACKWALL ECHO SIGNAL AMPLITUDE VARIATION MEASUREMENTS I

No. Gain (dE) i 1 48.5 2 59.1 7 59.1 i

4- 55.2 5 54.8 6 63.3 7 62.6 .j 8 50.5 '

9 54.1 j 10 57.8 L

11 52.6 12 60.5 MIN 48.5 dB MAX 63.3 dB I

Variation 14.8 dB L Average 56.5 dB t I

I l

l i

) i L ,i

l. l l

l

.' Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 5 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 j

) 6, O MANUAL UT EXAMINATION A Panametrics Epoch 2002 portable UT instrument and three RTD transducers were used for initial scanning.

During the initial scanning, two small volumetric mid-wall

)

reflectors were noted in the 9-o' clock region (see Figure 6-1).

Indication "b" is the same as indication "6." This indication was found by the IntraSpect/98 System and reported in Section 7.0.

) Reflector "c" was not confirmed by the IntraSpect/98 System as a valid indication and is not considered reportable. The origin of reflector "c" is probably a high amplitude grain reflection from the material.

All IntraSpect/98 images of the same region demonstrate there is no coherent reflector present. There are, however, relatively high-level signals from grain noise. It is common for overcalls (false calls) to occur during manual inspections of cast stainless steel components due to grain noise and other effects arising from the grain structure. A coherent target appears as a distinct echo-dynamic line on the IntraSpect/98 B-scan display and grain noise appears as " snow," similar in appearance to a television set picking up a distant channel. A manual operator does not have this type of data presentation and consequently is often led to erroneous conclusions.

Reflector "a" in the 3-o' clock region is an indication near or on the ID surface initially found by the Intraspect/98 and later confirmed manually. Reflector "a" is the same indication "1" reported in section 7.0. This indication appeared to be an ID planar reflector.

)

i Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 6 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

q j- M FEF 5I 5d5'o 20.0S OF 0 214 in Lii.'-

s a. p -t i

p. ... .

e e

i 9'g h Q.. .gt..... ......J ..... . . .

4\

9* ' /

f :

40 . . . . .. .

i

4. * .g , 0.'y i ;: :

s' it i ..

0 u.u o.,iM.. o.u&..d.,

je 3 .3o io. .

&W cs) Rec, 7.8 /

RfJ 0$'

GATE START 2.94in. REJ 0% REJ 0%

REF 53.0dB C 20.0 A ' O.815 in/DIV . REF 53.0A + 18,0A 0.815 204!V REF 53.0 4 + 20.0 A 0.915 in/Liu 00 7 .. ..- . v- . OF . 1 0 . . . , . -

... . e .g,J.,

. i . .

i .

e . . .. .

. s I .

JSy, y. ;y,v.;;~ :s

":.;.;:":": $ 60r . .: 60r . ., .,,

,9 ,., .

. . . > -. ,.,.s .

s .

.......,...;,,- 9...

.., i . . . . . .

y9.......... . .. . .. .

, 9.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

i c.. : e : i ~

46 . . Q:

's . :

.,.. *. .f' f ..' 'df ': ...-

i i

.........i.

. . . . r.. ,3 ..... 44. . . . . . . .. .

4S . . . . . .

.i

, v

., . . ,a g .

[ .

. . . . .t. : ..I'.':*d.,,'20'. . ! . ~{ -.; ' . . - . . . ~, 20 ....{..

s : ; . c' U .W in. + =

C N t.: , , i n. + s, ,

, :. b= . i n. . in s= 1. 1 in,vs 1.0 in.h.ut in

$) h), & $2- h') h N d i $ f & Y .l( 'k W h REJ 0'< GATELEVEL 44%

REF 56.0 4 + 10.0 A 0.861 in4!U i h.,: h # $-+ N.9 /MNt N l-hIn ,$ ldh ^-70 i i 0[ .: . .

T #$ ~ grp, Inh, W, L-%, &vije- d.. ... j . i .. ,

9.#h O., 8[NO I d'/dA4,8/Mf j f 9,.... .

d . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ..:. . . ! . . . . . . . . .! . . l (e) &. #c, T E 0

) I'igure 6-1.

( UT indications on the hot-leg elbow, Panametrics, Epoch 2002 (manual)

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 7 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

7.0 INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATED UT EXAMINATION 7.1 DETECTION OF INDICATIONS The primary instrument employed in this inspection was the Intraspect/98 Ultrasonic Imaging System manufactured by Amdata.

The system displays A, B, C.and B-prime images for ease in analyzing the data. A real*Stime C-scan is displayed while a scan is in process. Appendix H contains a technical description of the system. Appendix K contains a description of the legends displayed with the B-scan images.

The data presented in this report shows A-scans (RF waveforms),

B-scans (cross-sectional views along the scanning axis of the scanner) and C-scans (plan views at operator selected depths).

Appendices C, D and E contain information concerning calibration of the system. The width of the ultrasonic beam was determined using the 3/4 T side drilled hole in the calibration block. It was measured to be 1.0 inch between the minus 6 dB points.

The 3-o' clock and 9-o' clock sides of the elbow were scanned in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. All scans were performed using a raster pattern. The grid increment used in the scanning direction was 100 mils (0.100")

and in the lateral, or incrementing, direction it was 250 mils.

A single pitch-catch channel was used for RF data collection.

Two different pitch-catch sets of transducers were used, one manufactured by Harisonic and the other by RTD. Refer to Table 7.1-1 for a brief description of these transducers. Refer to Appendix F for further details. A complete set of RF waveforms was collected, digitized and recorded for the entire volume inspected. This data base completely documents the inspection. The data files are archived on quarter inch magnetic tapes.

Tah'le 7.1-1 l

TRANSDUCERS USED BY INTRASPECT/98 Pitch-Catch Size of Nominal Center Transducer Set Each Element Wedae Size Refracted Anale Frecuency I Harisonic 1.375" dia. 2.0" x 1.7" 45 L-Wave 1.0 MHz

! each element per trans-ducer (2 wedges) l RTD 0.8" x 1.4" 2.0" x 1.4" 45 0 L-Wave 1.0 MHz each element both trans-( ducers on i

one wedge Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 8 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

The IntraSpect/98 found seven indications in the elbow. Two of these indications are volumetric mid-wall reflectors and five are on the inside diameter (ID) surface. Refer to Figures 7.2-1, 7.2-4, 7.2-7, 7.2-10 and 7.2-13.

These data do not show connections between the mid-wall reflectors and the ID surface. Each is estimated to be less than 0.3 inch in length.

The indications on or very near the ID surface had indicated lengths equal to or less than 1.0 inch as read from the screen of the I/98. The indicated length was determined from the point the indication was first observed above the noise level to the point at which it dropped below the noise level.

The reported maximum length was determined as follows (refer to Appendix L for additional inf ormat. ion):

e Add 0.2 inch to the indicated length to account for the possibility of just missing the start and end of the

! indication on each end due to the 0.10 inch grid in the scanning direction. RF waveforms were recorded at 0.10 inch intervals in the scanning direction.

e Subtract the beamwidth from the indicated length.

e Divide by the cosine of 45 degrees to account for the possibility that the indication is oriented at the worst angle with respect to the transducer. Scans were performed at 0, 90, 180 and 360 degree skew angles and, hence, the worst possible " disorientation" is 45 degrees.

Reported length = ([ indicated length0 + 2(grid interval)]

- beamwidth)/cos 45 Reported length = {[1.0" + 2(0.10")] -

1.0)/cos 45 = 0.3" i

The indications on or very near the ID surface are small. Their origins are unknown. Taking into account the ultrasonic beam width at the ID surface, the actual physical length of each of i these reflectors is estimated to be less than 0.3 inch, a very small fraction of the circumference of the elbow.

The precise through wall extent of the ID indications cannot be specified. However, the small lengths of the indications suggest little penetration, which is expected to be less than 0.3 inch.

I i

I

/

Rev. 5, 7/1/87 Page 9 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

l A summary of the seven indications is provided in Table 7.1-2.

Indications 1 through 5 are on or very near the ID surface.

Indications 6 and 7 are- the mid-wall: reflectors. The nominal l .

wall thickness of the elbow is 3.375 inchas. Refer to section 4

4.0 for a discussion of the variation in wall thickness.

d Table 7.1-2

SUMMARY

OF INDICATIONS Indi-cation Form I/ 98 ./ Location

TOF Depth Number Name Tape X (in) Y (in) (usec) (inches) Amo(%) Notes 1 SET +8 UT-2 11.0-12.0 0.4 52.25 3.39 100.0 ID**

3 o' clock 2 SET +16 UT-3 3.5-4.5 0.8 53.40 3.48 100.0 ID 9 o' clock 3 SET +16 UT-3 5.75-6.25 0.9 53.40 3.48 69.3 ID 9 o' clock 4 SET +17 UT-3 7 . ' 5 --8 . 7 5 2.2 54.25 3.60 82.7 ID 9 o' clock 5 SET +18 UT-3 8.5-9.25 1.2 52.20 3.38 85.0 ID 9 o' clock 6 SETR+4 UT-4 11.3 2.75 36.15 2.03 100.0 270 0 to 3.50 mid-wall 9 o' clock 7 SETR+9 UT-5 12.6 4.25 27.65 1.32 100.0 90 U to 5.25 mid-wall 3 o' clock

These coordinates refer to the dimensions relative to the scan i

patterns shown en the elbow in Figuras 7.1-1 through 7.1-4.

t **0n or very near the inside diameter surfaca.

,i l

l Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 10 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

1 5

s

1.D. PLA YE

\ steam Generator

,I A o,o '

f- g 5.o Y 1 h

N /0.00"

.ssr* 7,8 9

V /80" it.o x i

Indication 1 l

3 C'CLadk' S/DE 1

Figure 7.1-1. Location of Indication 1

.a .

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 11 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 n.z i

~

. .r:

't indication 3 Indication 2

. Steam .

'"*'" I Indication 4 indication 5-4.5 /

SE T + /S, /4 7 C ', /80 * \

o" a eo' i,

}k

o. /0 $

\

is.;y U oo'

(' $ 2" o,o ,, /

4.0 r' N*

S f 7~+ /1, /8 Q*,/8Q*

9 O 'CL OCK ,5/DE L

Figure 7.1-2. Location of Indications 2, 3, 4, and 5 l

'Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 12 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1

~

p. ;

i i

l Indication 6 /'

. Steam ' ,

. Generator.

.j---_

rx+ --

L .

4.

\ Werce I i

\ Mo* l

\_ ._I N 9 u w as 9 C'Cl CCW S/DC Figure 7.1-3. Location of Indication 6 i

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 13 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

0

/: .

A O. Al A TE

/' \

'/ \ Steam

'g ', Generator :

f

'w L-f - 8 o i l SE 7~& 9, n l 13,0 " \

1 9d' E70' [ .

lJ 14.0 Ja Indication 7 1 3 Q'Cl CC K 3/DE l'

Figure 7.1-4. Location of Indication 7

~ Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 14 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

7.2 POST-INSPECTION SIGNAL PROCESSING The EPRI NDE Center performed signal processing to enhance the i signal-to-baseline ratios and hence improve the quality of the 4 B- and C-scan images. Bandpass filtering was found to be l effective. Portions of the data files were down-loaded into an )

i IBM-PC based signal processing system and bandpass filtered. The j major improvement was the removal of low-frequency components observed in the raw data recorded by the Intraspect/98. The filter had a bandpass (3 dB down) from 0.6 to 1.4 MHz.

A list of the files of both the raw data and the NDE Center post-l processed data is given in Table 7.2-1. The signal-to-baseline ratio improvements after the filtering are listed in Table 7.2-2.

i Table 7.2-1 DATA FILES FOR POST-PROCESSED IMAGES.

1 NDE Center j Indication 1/98 IBM PC* I l

I 1 SET +8 IMS115 ,

i

) 2 SET +16 IMTS02 l

3 SET +16 IMTS03 4 SET +17 IMTS04 5 SET +18 IMTS05 ;

l 6 SETR+4 IMTS06

Each of these images was formed using data from 18 axial strokes from the corresponding

( I/98 data file.

I t

)

s Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 15 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l,

l Table 7.2-2 SIGNAL-TO-BASELINE RATIO IMPROVEMENTS Indication File' Location Egforg After Difference i

1 IMS115 ID 13.7 18.0 +4.3 2' IMTS02 ID 13.1 16.1 +3.0

'I 3 IMTSO3 ID 12.2 15.1 +2.9 I 4 IMTSO4 ID 13.5 14.4 +0.9

'5- IMTS05 ID 11.7 12.5 +0.8 I

6 IMTS06 Midwall 17.4 20.6 +3.2 l i

The images of the detected indications before and after bandpass i filtering are shown in Figure 7.2-1 through Figure 7.2-19. Note l that these images appear somewhat different because there is no correction for geometry and they go from left to right instead of top to bottom. The image shown in the top middlo portion of each

)

figure uses the X-axis time-of-flight (microseconds) and the Y-axis t

for the lateral position (inches) of the transducer. It also

[ shows an RF waveform obtained from the line on the image with the

!. small rectangular box.

j Obviously, the bandpass filtering eliminated low-frequency noise

[' 'and improved the overall signal-to-baseline ratios. Consequently, the quality of the images was also inproved accordingly. The signals from indication #6 already had high signal-to-baseline l ratios, hence, no obvious improvement was observed. No attempt 1 was made by.the NDE Center to size the. detected indications. )

(

I i

l l

i Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 16 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 I

i

]

LOOP-2 ELBOW 3 0' CLOCK - FORn SET +9 -- CHt.1 ; 04/08/87 10:02-10:57 21-30%

X 0.00" -> 12.00" BY 0.25" Ax! AL SCAri ANOI 45.00 CA!N: 56.Or) 08 31-33%

~ Ya 2 0.N" -p 6.00" BY 0.10" DACs OFF .SK 8100.00 MINUS WELCS10E 40 49%

P.NP I 100.00% FSHf MPs 4.79" GATE DELAY WIDTH 5&BO%

TOF - 52.25 US+- t- DPs 3.3E" CDP 3.90"- A (US) 12.00 '_48.00 C1 69%

SC(X.Y)=( 11.50.' O.40) 50=< -3.39 ) G 2/2 0 C (US) 50.00 10.00 70-78%

73-83%

4 90-100% )

,3..+.c toc %.- e . ,

7,5 .

50, n

o .- ' f?

i

)

25 -[ " .- h;. g;. !.

,,m k[.{ ,

h [

2 [ ';v: y y vv: y'g .

l,y Vy 100x _.

d Figure 7.2-1. IntraSpect/98 Image of Indication 1 t.

{

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 17 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1

'l 9

3.1_ IMS 115. TIM 128

,.,: . t -

t;

' ',; ' ' . 'p :

i

[. .'i .

[f -

IU

54

2. 8 _ ' '_: f -j '

!' ' 1, pj.3y',['lhllt Jlll((j h f] *t l.

_JL ,ll 1 .'? }

m 2.6 ; ;)k, I-

.(.g'<.t - H- I lf!L s

@[

3.i.. s. a .

g ',,''l .'- ' {.'..,,[#9j.gggi l ll.. j' y 3_ 9 . . . '

'?

O ;&- , ' ' _ _

j ,

-l )

1 .; . ~~

-64 '

, f ;

3

2. 9_ t '-

1

.. )

-128 l,-

'y:

c. l. ., a-

? '

I..' t 3

,.,...}

j

,. 3

. ,; 4

.. .i.

i

,7 _

,, ; y Q;;,

'. 9 19'.2 29'.5 39'.7 41'.9 51'.2 242 CH O SE C S l

I CURS 0R POSITION

N,N N$iIhyY1Y4 dII Y AXIS

X AXIS .

2.83 hghgAgQ gj23lp,Yj4py;kkIM357(('fAM'SI$dNIN.*2$[M jSHRIjfpjJfgB 31.5 -

X(*.

/ wal1) 43.5 l

O 2.83 ,

31.5 43.5 L)L Figure 7.2-2. IBM PC Image of Indicaton 1 Before Signal Processing t

I Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 18 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

l J

3.1 - IMS 115.FIL 128 ,

g . , -

l EI jy J,g ;,, ['$ $

{

64 l

1

2. 8 _

<, l?.j h) ) [ , \'b

,4

.3 ,; ,

7 g t > f il p-1, ;, (( f[ Qhf cwg4 s fo

)1 i(ft i( xg ) s i', y 7

...l9,,lyp.'(t[44.4

< p:

"f;f ) 4 '- I j ' ,)! N ;'. [\j}.

2. 6 _

i.$c w.i$

0 g ,;

9 $

v i

.;; i yf r: .:

j lf} l ,' i; ..'< t tg f),' '

Jg 2 3_ ; (< tT( g g ; g {g g,g ! g .l 3 e 8

.}, ; ;;} } . . .

hi. 'j

-64 A i ': ,

ji 4 '

.i ?!{ntl l , l ']! 'lj .

~

2. 9 _ .l 4 I ! !

l '. ll

-128 j

1. 7 _ ,

gy ; ,) g ,g

'. 9 19'.2 20.5 39'.7 41',9 51'.2 MICH O G3EC C G CURSOR POSITION MNIUALdEhYgiS8' j?I

? NAS?b5]h'E2&,h f[49!55 k Y RMS- N0l S Ei16'.1Eli h??bbB5'fQH)}f199)B)y&))

{ ,

X(X wall) 49.4 l

3 33.7 l 48.7 I

Figure 7.2-3. IBM PC Image of Indication 1 i After Signal Processing 1

l i

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 19 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 t

(

i 1

'X 0.00* ~) 7.00" BY 0.25" AxtAL SCAN ANG 45.00 GAINS 56.00 00 31-33%

i Ys 0.00" -> 8.45' BY 0.10" DACs OFF ~ .SK #180.00 "NINUS WELDS!DE 40-43%

AMPS 100.00% FSH OATE - 'OELAY i

53.40 US , '.NPs

-r WIOTH TDFs 4.93".

ops 3.27" CDPs 4.01 A (US) 12.00 48.00 i SC(X.Y)=( 4.50. 0.80) SO=( -3.48 ) e 2/2 U-- C (US) 50.00 10.00 50-60'2 61-633 70-78%

.[* 79-83%

90-100% j h '

7s . < _ ,

l so 3 y b p. :g ;Q p g- l 1s ' , Mll: Q Ng y \p4 y 7s 100kt Figure 7.2-4. IntraSpect/98 Image of Indication 2 i

l

\

l l

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 20 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l

l l

.J

l

.3- IMT S O 2. TIM 128 1

,,,.; . ;. qp,,-

. , t '.l n. .

. >. '. U

' ) ..N 'f.. .I:

~

.l \ >

.6_

64 I!

- J hb )t:> h .

! 'i .; .i

. i

,t -

((i's l l-r $W.o !1' . T t,T .

lf\. bpl ll:g , : ,0 .' ? y h.), f' 9

_ 9-s

,: Y -, g

; - i >

j, f. . ,; h ,.j .

4 5 t-l l15 sQ:?;-l .

k .

p;.

d ;,i'a V

4 21.2 _

t%(({-:1M.

)

-64 { s _

5!>i.

l. . .. [

d,$,[Ii

!? t]$:

f l

. i f g , , j. , .(. ! .- ..<.' p, l' . , qj; .

1. 5 _ l' ' f j f. , 3 ,. jJ 0 II Ai 5 11;;f r-'

y u 't 1) ?,'J. :1[ g . _ kt W ? ': li' $,

I'd !

-128 1.8 - ' " ' ' :l

' * ' ' !' "} .

R+ it ' ' i f.Y

'. 9 19'.2 29'.5 30'.7 41'.9 51'.2 MIC24 0 SE C S CUR $0R POSITION

) Y AXIS

X AXIS .

3.16

.9

[]N Ni.UA11[ENkE833fl$k2h0'?'#g 3 SHRli;1,3f1pBghj !$,3ALUEjg$ %])fQ113

)

X(X wall) .9 36.1 f 58.3 Figure 7.2-5. IBM PC Image of Indication 2 Before Signal Processing l

L l

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 21 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

_-_ _ -_-________-______________ ___ .- a

1

(-

l

~/

.3_ IMT S O 2.FIL h h

.6_ ,

p, . . .:,c .1, j .

32

,{ 4(, .,.g m

, g g . . . . -g i ..

. ; ,7 pi, 4

\

" 6c' U..4:i .i .,t t {. ; , , t]lii '.i i '.

w

..u>;

m : ll ! ; '

g '8 -

a 1 t y. I,)

mi . 2 _ i,f I:] : D .

i ll ,

'(,j

j "[~

; . .b;;

4. , , j l, P ",

'by, '

~88 g I ;; ->t.;

i. : t< .

g;;

l a.

1,3 ,, IT'.)3<i-

3

!j . ,

j' .f 1i iI ,i

! .It . 'l ; -/H{l ;f W;;

I lf. m( . Ijp f

-'4 1.s_lh

. n I I I ' ' l i < ' ~ ' ! ~. . ~ l '1

8 i'

)

'. e 1e'. 2 2 e'. s se'. 7 41'. e si'. 2 urcnoszca {

CURSOR POSITION i

i Y AXIS :

X AXIS :

3.16

.e ([EAXINAb5[Ikhd((AI[U$e$d(k)Dt5$N01'5E}$$I2$

N.I$UAM ?ffdQT a,&T,6G/gStjRQ6),1pBgh j -

j X(x wall) .e I 1

0 l

1.Be 36.1 I 58.3 Figure 7.2-6. IBM PC Image of Indication 2 After Signal Processing l

1' l

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 22 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

- _ - - _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ - _ - - - - a

I

-INTRASPECT/98 VIP REU C 'RDAS E11 SC6032 D At1 DATA INC.. (C) 1987 0-20%

LOOP-2 ELBou 9 0' CLOCK ' FORrt SET +16. CH: 1 04/09/87 12:56-13:00 21-30%

Xs 0.00* -> .

Ys- 0.00* ->' 8.45" BY 0.10*

7.00* BY 0.25* AXIAL SCAN ANGs 45.00 OA!Ns 66.00 DB 31-39%

AMPS 1 69.29% FSHs MPs 4.93": iDAC: OFF . SK s100.00

'TOFs CATE ti!NUS WELDSIDE DELAY. utOtH 40-49%

53.40 US . OP s P 3.27" , CDPs' 4.01" -A (US) 12.00 50-60/*

SC(X.Y)=( 6.00. J O.90) - SO=( -3.48 ) $ 2/2 U 48.00 61-695 C (US)' 60.00 10.00 70-78%.

79-89%

a. 90-100%

! ? ~ ,

.Q

. u:

I. l f

rw w : vvyvw v vo l

7C 100%-

Figure 7.2-7. IntraSpect/98 Image of I11dication 3 l

l

\

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 23 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

l i l 1

i l

I 1

.2_ IMT S O S . TIM 128 -

'g' - J pr{' .- J 3 77 y yge i

.i o . m I li.Ii.t.;j.

cr : 4 - 1 ) -

.5 p ' hh 7 : 1

;l k ! U '

64 .

3I/

t t,I k < i. - f 1 4 - I'..n 'f I! 'MI ' '

l

,.8- > J . n! (j 4} *; i l , '- 2 2%'

rG b

)

r ,t.7. 1i. ' - t.) . f,;

}j f[pk'; J N 'I5 I 1-I '."1i; . yg;.

9 $ a- l

' * ( ' ~ - i ba,

.i -

4 I

[1.1_ : jU .

j i ; M*f li'~' f -

-64 @ '(,i)l:5(*'-

,1 .,

c! !. ' Yh '

1. 4 _ P, . . ) ; . .' . '

' ~

t

{r- ' 'I 'I g f f ! i ! 4'- ){ D.

, a . 4, e ib

"e 2

( g aI a.'

' .:l q.,

i

. 1 ! : :

1 L !..

., - yp

-128 "

l i. .; ' j':

' bb

f. [ : , , k. :

l

'. 9 19'.2 29'.5 39'.7 41'.9 51'.2 Mrcnoszca CURSOR POSITION {Md;UALNEk Ekfikfk1T49%RMS?N61gE[2155 l

i V AXIS :

X AXIS :

2.61

.9

)tINjyALUEl,g,gjh,Af 7 3735ffgg12 3 2fDBfg%(j q X(x wall) .9 Iq g

36,9 58.9 ,

Figure 7.2-8. IBM PC Image of Indication 3 Before Signal Processing I

l '1 1

l Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 24 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l s

.2_ IMT S O B .FIL

' ~

2 I) '

j: jll il l

.8_

l ll'I NHj!l /;'

'il j dl .[- U ) l))eP, .I s !

9 -

t 4<. fJ i .l ;f eni .1_ g

' t h . ,-

! i :: .i ff l

-32 1 ff ,; h , -l .' 1, : { }

{'"' 1. 4 _ i 3 .;!

i I, f:f' f ;),i} ei :

. .l 4! s i ~ 4 . ;' . ;, :

jU Ilu{s'(;,'lRJh,. .

1.v _ n T i l !

tva m.]

'. 9 19'. 2 ' 2 0'. 7, 39'.7 41'.9 51'.2 MI CR O BE C s CURSOR POSITIOH Ndhlbk $5'kI ikf3Y $h$15ff'[2.hIfjj

2. 6 (MI,N}yALUE .__m .

62;AT,41]89]h[SHRij15jpDBlNy'.e Ag X&. wall) .9 l 1.70 '

36.9 58.0 I '

l Figure 7.2-9. IBM PC Image of Indication 3 After Signal Processing i

l l 1 Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 25 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

l.

~

l l

l 1

LOOP-2 ELBOW 8 0' CLOCK FORMS SET +17 CH s 1 04/09/87 14:03-14:07 21-30%

Xs 0.00" ->. 8.50" BY 0.25" Ax!AL SCati' ANO: 45.00 CAIN: 56.00 08 31-39%

Y 0.00" -> - DACs OFF SX O.00 MINUS WELOSIDE 40 49%

6t1P s 82.68% FSH:4.00"MPs BY 0.10"..

5.09" -

CATE DELAY W10TH go.60%

TOFs 54.75 US . . OP 3 3.15" CDPs 4.15" . A (US) 12.00 48.00 61-69%

SC(X.Y)=( '8.25.' 2.20)' SO=( 3.60 ) e 2/2 U C (US) 50.00' 10.00 70-78%

79-09%

90-100%

( ,. 0 0. +

10c%. <, . ,

7, ,

~

50i -

s.$1 A16$M> d !V' k' NN MA h < '

~

hA/

a :ypvyvyy ~m ;y vv 7s-gyy i J-l 100k <

1 Figure 7.2-10. IntraSpect/98 Image of Indication 4 Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 26 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

l

2. 8 _ - IMT S O 4. TIM 128

,w .

.,y. j r ;y, , ,g;,. q g

.. : ,s . yt j

~

64 II

,2.2 i 'n 'u *f \

E

,;.g(s I Y .i :. ,8

) '. 1 :

j} p, d m.8-o 1

s 6

.t

~ ~ *, l: ' ,;I -

. . . n k 3 ni

-64 A '

, . ,, 5. I '

}

1. 5 _ 9 (; M'g i' ' '*<N '[r r

^b :

' ': W ^%

-128 '

1. 2 _ . - t 1 if7 -

1

'. e 1e'. 2 2 e'.

je'.7 41'. e 51'.2 cuasoR POSITIOH [ MAX' I Y AXIS : 1.2e f. HIN;; Y ALU EN$f2hbkNTEkdiAS j5 (RMS i Ndi 5 E X AXIS : .a $

X(x wall) .a l

{

8- 1 in i o 4 Figure 7.2-11. IBM PC Image of Indication 4 1 Before Signal Processing L

}

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 27 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

\

i 2.8

128 j- ,

3 , . . .

'. 0 10'.2 20'.5 0'. ? 41'.0 51'.2 t

" i fa*lis I I.'!" Ejis;j@bh53i!!khN[$kksi,i"!I!fASYih l I (x ali) 8 lu u j

l l

Figure 7.2-12. IBM PC Image of Indication 4 After Signal Processing l

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 28 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

i i

1 1

LOOP-2 ELBOW 9 0' CLOCK - Fortis SET +18 CH: 1 -04/09/87 14:20-14:23 21-30%

X '.'O.00* ->- 9.50" BY 0.25"

- Ax!AL SCAN <ANO: 45.00 CA!N: 56.00 DB .31-33%

YsO.00" ->> 4.00"t1Ps BY ,4.78"-

0.10"" DACE OFF- .SK s100.00 r11NUS WELDSIDE 40 4sg AMPS 85.04% FSH.- -

. ' ', GATE ," DELAY WIOTH TOF - 62.20 US . DP .,.3.37"? CDPs# 3.99" - - A ( US ) 12.00. 48.00 50-60%

SC(X.Y)=( 0.75. 1.20)' SD=( -3.38 ) e 2/2 U C (US) 50.00 10.00 61-69%

70-78%

'.1 6

79-89%

90-100%

rp t ,

e e' ~

_.'$9' 45 M,

7s ;.

+

, r 3.:,, ~ -

, i vt ;p . , 1 * ~-

r -

q g. . 7 4M '. .

l , .

l g .g k @ 7 ' , M ;( g y:'V N Q s"( Q g V 50 ,

., f i 7s: ,

100%

Figure 7.2-13. IntraSpect/98 Image of Indication 5 Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 29 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

--_____-_--_-_-_ - _ _ _ _ -- A

l' 1 l

l

~

IMT S O S . TIM i 128 -

7 +- m - ,, ': ;' .. -l

) . f' ' {l 91: 3- f.!

~

~1 ll l.' f.

lf , :!

.9_ ,

{ fi l -A1- '

..n-3 .lk '

f l ?! E.

'i

1. 2 _ -

k g . f-. .

{ '} > f o, !

fj f e{ ; :

m .5_

i

{ .1 g .

p

-64 flik . -

1 Ir

{ .j ,fI

1. 8 _ ,

l -

-128 .

J .

., ! l3l

'. 9 19'.2 29'.5 9'. 7 41'.9 51'.2 CURSOR POSITION : MAX.UALUE 'Nf.d8'dh'UI99$EE$tMS .N0lSEi2A E4

{

2. i.HIN _UALUEh;:jQ5 Mff2J5,5MSfifis11,j?iDBMQ X(x wall) .9 2.19 I iu 6

Figure 7.2-14. IBM PC Image of Indication 5 Before Signal Processing 1

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 30 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

,g_ IMT S O 5.FIL !

'. 9 19'.2 20'.5 9'. 7 41'.9 51'.2 A 2.

g f ,,

A X('.

/ wall) .9 i .

9 iu '

y I""/rsn!!ElisiM*""

f l

Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 31 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

}

b,

.l

'-1NTRASPECT/86 LOOP-2 ELBOW 9 0'C VIP

,4KREV C. RDAS

'

FORMS SETR+4 Eli SCS032 CH: 1 D ArIDATA INC. . (C) 1987 0-20%

Xs 0.00 * - > .: 12.00* BY 0.10" 04/10/87 -14:41-14:48 21-30%

Ya- 0.00* -> CIRC.

OAC OFF SCAN ANGs 45.00. GAIN: 52.00 00 31-39%

AMP s 100.00% FSH' . - t1PO.00* BY 0.25" '

2.87* ..SK s270.00' f1INUS WELDSIDE 40 49%.

OATE - DELAY WIDTH TOF - 36.15 US' .' DPs ~2.03" CDPs"2.26" A (US) 12.00 51.00 50-607 SC(X.Y)=( 11.30. 3.00)^ $0=( -2.03 ) S 1/2 U C (US)-12.00 51.00 g6179g-69.$

' ' e.'::

a

+

79-89%

,.s ev 90-100*4

., n 6 ,

, , s, > .

I 1

e

~g.,,

Ab6P. ,

7s' 'i:9

[

I s

)

}p.f " f f :g. g so . . V WNR~\l PM-W'VvvMV: Y" pg : s : ,

100*/

Figure 7.2-16. IntraSpect/98 Image of Indication 6 l

i i

l 1

, Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 32 Trojen Inspection Report, IR252

,,,_ IMT S O S . TIM 128 , g y g.y 7 qi g , . . .,;

4

~

'. 9 19'.2 29'.5 30'.7 41'.9 51'.2

!"E s" "M.'s" :llONbl{@k!!jj@jyaijNf&lf${

(v. ali) 4 l

1 g l 7.1 Figure 7.2-17. IBM PC Image of Indication 6 {

Before Signal Processing i 1 i

I Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 33 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

)

,,,_ IMT S O S .FIL 19.2 _ :I 2 ' fI Ei}$h.t0l11 41

1. 6 _ : i j'

-128 12.9 _

jy j ;p,3 nIy j jy f,. .

'. 9 19'.2 29'.5 9'. 7 41'.9 51'.2

["[jf(("E's $$NEidk!$}k.!!!N$$!El$5!ENDd X(x wall) .9 12.99 2:::

Figure 7.2-18. IBM PC Image of Indication 6 i After Signal processing i

1 1

} an. 4, s/18/87 page 34 Trojan Inspection neport, In252

)

0-20%

LOOP-2 ELBOW 3 0' CLOCK . FORMS SETR+9 CH: 1 04/11/87 10:33-10:42 21-30%

X:- 0.00* -> 13.50* BY 0.10* > CIRC. SCart .'. ANO: 45.00 GAIN: 52.00 08 31-39%.

Y: 0.00* -> ' ' 8.7G" BY 0.25" ' 'DAC OFF ' SK 90.00 ' t11NUS WELOS10E 40-49%

AMPS 100.00% FSH MPs. 1.86* - .. ;",-' GATE DELAY .W10TH 50-60%

TOF 27.65 US ,

ops- 1.32' CDP 1 1.40"4 - 'A (US) ~ 12.00 ' 51.00 61 69%

SC(x.Y)=( 12.60. 5.C.0) SO=< 1.32 ) e 1/2 U -C (US) 12.00 '51.00 70 578%

4 79-89%

,.g f ;

3 r

90-100%

, ..u i

.a i, . . . .

100% , ,

..+- -

,f. < t-75 ? I

, s

, , . ,~

<j 50 ,/'%

i

c. .f i ' ,

- 25 ;

, 3 +flQ g 3 0)if '

h - Q [g g g ,

. C V & ~ N;V.; V VVVVV n:; <

100x _N'

\

Figure 7.2-19. IntraSpect/98 Image of Indication 7 j

\

t Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 35 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1

8.0 RADIOGRAPHS OF ELBOW The radiographs produced by ESCO Corporation, the manufacturer of f the elbow, were reviewed to determine if the indications detected j by the IntraSpect/98 were in the component when it was placed in j service. 1 The radiographs were produced using a panoramic' technique with a Cobalt-60 source. Single loaded Kodak AA film (type II) was used. The distance from the source to the film was 17 inches and j the approximate geometrical sharpness of the image is 0.045 inch.

The radiographs reviewed are grainy with relatively low contrast and sensitivity for detecting interior surface discontinuities, j No indications were observed in the areas of interest that are j similar to the UT reflectors observed. The radiographs were of 4 no help in interpreting the UT data. They can neither confirm !

nor deny the presence of the-indications prior to placing the elbow into service. 7 '

1 9.O CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS L i A volumetric examination was conducted on the hot-leg elbow of I reactor coolant loop B in accordance with the requirements of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Seven (7) indications were found using the IntraSpect/98 Ultrasonic Imaging System.

l Two of the indications are located in the mid-wall region and are not connected to the ID surface of the elbow. The responses from l

these reflectors are similar to the side-drilled holes in the calibration standard. Both of these are estimated to be less j than 0.3 inch in length. They are most likely inclusions arising from the original manufacturing process and not stress related. ^

l Five indications were detected on or very near the ID surface of the elbow. Their ultrasonic characteristics are similar to the response from an ID notch.

The indications near the ID surface are small. Their origins are unknown and cannot be determined from the UT data. The maximum length of the largest of these indications is approximately 1.0 inch as measured from the display on the Intraspect/98. Taking into account the ultrasonic beamwidth at the ID surface, the l actual physical length of each of these reflectors is estimated to be less than 0.3 inch. As mentioned in Section 4.0, the

) measured thickness of five points on the 9-o' clock region varied from 3.23" to 4.13", so that the ID indications could be actually located in the mid-wall region, but close to the ID surface in terms of their time-of-flight.

f Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 36 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

Tha precico through-wcl1 extent of tha ID indications cannot ba specified. However, the small indications suggest little penetration, which is not expected to exceed 0.3 inch.

The radiography records provided by the vendor of the elbow lack l the necessary sensitivity to determine if these indications were

! originally in the elbow. No prior UT examination was conducted with sufficient sensitivity and repeatability to detect them.

Indication number 1 on the 3-o' clock side near the ID was 3 detected using both manual techniques and the Intraspect/98 system. Indications 2, 3, 4 and 5 on the 9-o' clock side near the ID were detected by the Intraspect/98 system but could not be detected using manual methods.

Four courses of action were considered to better characterize the indications:

1. Enhancement of Radicaraohst The graininess of the radiographs makes enhancement impractical. Peter Hedgecock at Aptech Engineering confirmed this conclusjon.

)

2. Visual Examination. A visual examination is judged to be impractical due to the physical restrictions in ;

getting a TV camera to the proper locations inside the elbow. In addition, it is unlikely that a TV system {l operating inside the elbow would have the resolution necessary to see the small indications.

l

3. Radicarachy. The Minac system could be used to radiograph the elbow. However, the resolution of the system is inadequate to detect such smell indications.

i

4. Ultrasonics. The IntraSpect/98 could re-examine the indications at a future date. This would provide PGE with two data points to determine if the indications j i are growing. '

The most practical plan would be to monitor the indications ultrasonically. The current examination results constitute a baseline. To determine if the indications are growing, future inspections using the Intraspect/98 system can be performed and those images compared to the images obtained in this inspection. I Indication number 1 exhibits the most significant signal ;

characteristics and, as a minimum course of action, it should be !

re-examined in 1988.

l i

)

1 l l I I I

I l

Rev. 5, 7/1/87 Page 37 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 I

t

")

o l

10.0 REFERENCES

d ,

j ~

ci w' 1. Impell Corporaticw,,7_yfpluaiton of Reactor Coolant LooD for 59 strained Therm d_Exnansign; Troian Nuclear Plant, Report i do. 01-0300-1525, Rev.(1, August 1986. l a

2. ImpellCorporation,PIgliminh*ThermalExpansionEvaluation of the Reactor _ C0clant Looo iqr the Troian Nuclear Plant;,

December 1985.

\

3. Amdat"a, Inc., " Minutes and Action Items Resulting from the Meefing with EPRI and Portland General Electric Company,"

Oc:l# der 1986, Meeting Minutes.

' k[\ '!)!cquest for Additional Information en Trojan Inspection of '

i 1a;the Cast Stainless Steel Hot-Log Elbows," Letter, Attachment

's F , June 3, 1986,.

.r.

s s

. /5. Jeong, P., Ultrasonic Wave Procaaation Considerations fpg q m

Centrifugally,_ Cant St.Ainless Steel Pine Inspection,~EFrd NDE j

' ! ', Center, RP-1570-2, Final Report, February 1987. I

6. Kusy,Richardethl, 121trasonic Inspection of Static- \

Cast Stainless Steel Hot-Lea Elbow at Troian Nuclear Stat ljg, on-site preliminary inspection report submitted to PGE, April 13, 1987. -

, s ,

+. ,

1 .

g g \ ?

-.)

) I i c k

f l

4 5

/

s s

}

.y g .

4 Rev. 4, 6/18/87 Page 38 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252

\ ,

~

(

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - ~-- ~~ -~ ~

3 Appendix A HISTORY OF THE HOT-LEG ELBOW PROBLEM l

l l

l i

i 5/4/87 page A-1 l

l J

. .(

il

HISTORY OF THE HOT-LEG ELBOW PROBLEM BACKGROUND Ultrasonic examination of hot-leg elbow (SCSS) was conducted at

' Trojan Power Plant from April 2 through April 14, 1987. EPRI NDEC/Amdata/CE participated in this activity.

Location

, Rainier, Oregon, about 50 miles north of Portland, Oregon.

Type Westinghouse design, 4-loop PWR, owned by Portland General Electric.

CHRON'JIDGY OF PROBLEM June 1982-

1. A surge line' modification was conducted to allow removal of the thermal sleeve at the surge line connection to the reactor coolant loop (RCL) .

2. During this process, it was noted that the clearance between the surge line and several rupture restraints were not as originally designed.

{

3 '.

In some cases, there was contact between the pipe and I the rupture restraints.

4. Reshimming of the rupture restraints was performed to reestablish design clearances. i j

5. A program was started to examine clearances at all the }

surge line rupture restraints.

6. Later inspections indicated that the surge line )

continued to move (not returning to its original cold position), and afterward reshimming was done on two )

separate occasions to maintain design clearances. 1 L !

5/4/87 Page A-2

) I

May.1985 l i

i

1. Impell Corporation performed an evaluation of the !

piping system under the effects of gravity, thermal j expansion, thermal cycling, stratified thermal layer, !

and cold spring. '

Results:- I i

(A) Impell found that RCL rotation provided the best !

fit to the observed surge line movement, but the l cause'of such displacement was not known. j (B) Strains in the surge line in its observed deflected shape were well within ASME Code allowables.

November 1985 l

1. PGE indicated that two steam generator snubbers were degraded based on snubber test results.

2. The conclusions from the May and November work by Impell and PGE,are that snubber-lockup conditions could produce the RCL rotation (observed by Impell), and consequently cause the hot-leg rupture restraint contact.

1

3. Impell performed RCL thermal expansion evaluation using i finite element analysis and reviewed efforts of assumed snubber-lockup on other piping systems attached to the hot-leg and steam generator.

Results: The hot-leg elbow exceeded the allowable stress limit under those assumptions (conditions). ,

PGE DECISIONS f

1. Measurement on ovalness of elbow; surface examination by i PT; wall thickness measurements; volumetric UT examination.

2. Priority of exam; loop B/D/C/A (probably determined by previous test conditions of all restraints).

MEETING: EPRI/PGE/AMDATA 10/13/86

1. Examine elbow to satisfy NRC concerns pertaining to fatigue cracking.

2. Postulated cracking is in the body of the elbow--not in or near the weld metal.

3. The areas on the elbow to inspect were 3- and 9-o' clock regions (the sides of the elbow)--determined by previous EPRI experimental fatigue testing that resulted in a rupture at the sides of the test loop elbow.

5/4/87 Page A-3

l 1 1

i Appendix D i DATA SHEETS

)

I 4

I a

l i

l j

I i

l I

l i

1 l j i i i

i i )

i 1

i Rev. 2, 5/4/87 page B-1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 s

l J

.i

. ; }

i INTRASPECT/9'8. AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM LINEARITY CHECK RECORD

'l 1

1

.l l 5ITE TOJ/?^l Nuc/M^? /2wM PW 7"* l

~ SYSTEM NUMBER 04G REV VJ/0 etC

< . C 3 7J6 .)

, SEARCH UNIT SN # cS735 FREQUENCY / d ANGLE YS 9W/LW _J

'1

. h/NollSL ;

- I. SCREEN HEIGHT LINEARITY Ms ~nt * ! {

g,,,wnt az. .

100%' ,

99Ja S3. 9 /

80% Fo.v7 4/. y/ \

64% G V olo 3/45 50% S/ 54 .2 (,.56 1

1 40% W. W Ju 6(o 32% 32 of /G. 4/ \

25% 38./3 12. S o \ j

~20% A/.86- /o./ G \

' II . fAMPLITUDE CONTROL LINEARITY Systen Gain Signal Amplitude Filo il File #2 File #3 File $4 Set 80% PS. / G

-6 dB. 32-48% 4J.97 \

-12 dB 16-24% 43. /y' Set 40% M297 \

+6 dB f.4-96% /$ 9/ {

l- Set 20t 23 W I

+12 dB 60-90% ff9/

DATE fe[87 TIME /'546 CHECKED BY , d [ N EVEL JZ. DATE 8//d7 s frE 14*7 I/98 Check Record l; Re . , 4 /87 1 of 4 Page.-2 B

L

INTRASPECT/98 EAUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC' IMAGING SYSTEM

"# CALIBRATION' RECORD Calibration # f i SITE ~7%7MNd/wr $ur.e Al'mi- Record # %/dd4/ ~/ l 1

j SYSTEM #~ 48(o . REVvrpf# # ' RPP # c a / RDAS.# dh ser ent - 9 ; try) .

b'ORM NAME Ser cm. 10 (cur) TAPE uf-/

. CALIBRATION BLOCK 5'A/~/

REFLECTOR 3/Y #6 7 F M w ONo_re/;

COUPLANT u / #4 9e(- l 0 3?d6 ANGLE '/S

, SEARCH . UNIT # ~ c 3715 FREQUENCY /.d 9%/LW INITIAL' CALIBRATION-DATA:

C"- * /. -/ '

! __________l

'/2 79s h REFLECTOR. wonh l

~

81 #3

' GAIN (dB)

TOP;(us) '

4fI T2 AMP'-(%FSH) (fb 6 >/#fo j i

~ CALIBRATION CHECKS:

rn' c or DATE yggy j,py .

TIME /2 ?43 18 ' O '

CH #

/ /

REFLECTOR $/c/, ldT. tvdd )[T,

'" fa (,, tev j V/K f'O.6,4 0 (, q OPERATOR v

I_ -

LEVEL I h OPERATOR Y i 8-p LEVEL 1 p.

) /

OPERATOR / Nd LEVEL A//9

{ ,/

DATE F/ M REVIEWED BY /# LEVEL [//___. <

y i }

Rev <l', 4/1/87 3 of 4 I/98 Check Record I

i Page B-3 l

4 J e y.

INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM-EXAMINATION

SUMMARY

RECORD l Record #

S1TE Tforna A w</ ear fewec / TANT l Plc /Ja 4/- /

Tape e SYSTEM # Odb REV if <# Ar i/ C. FORM- /_4 T- / '

EXAM AREA SKETCH:

' Note Sketch 0 reference point

,i l- 4 i

l HON !i Nominal thickness .

t i

l Scan X1X2 y 2~

I' l l area: Y1 j i----__---___C _- r - 8 1

l Configuration and

' surface conditioning o

l pcH 6

' i t

1

SUMMARY

OF ANALYSIS RESULTS:

FORM FINDINGS COMMENTS i

---_-__-_---_-_--__-- )

' SF7 r/- ^

Sir +2 set

v3 5er r y go g g,.

nom }

l Scr r3

.s t r - t Str - 2 Ser- 2 g g ---_--___----_-------------_---_------_--____-__--- ---_--

l REMARKS: i l

OPERATOR U t < [. q[%. LEVEL

[ DATE 4-30-f7 c.

- [,o -

LEVEL f DATE MSo//7 3

y v ANALYST U%d- $3

N LEVEL ./7_ DATE 8-E -#7

. REVIEWED BY 7

.-c / -

Mt LEVEL K DATE 6-/-87 1

Rev. 1, 4/1/87 4 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page g_4

1 9

INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM CALIBRATION RECORD

' Calibration #

A i SITE T~foJh A>vc/ecs A>s< fat Als7"~ l Record #_ 8 48 /da V - a- l SYSTEM # c-)ck REV#wp e/ C. RPP # OJ/ RDAS # O G D- ,

SE r c L -t LTu)

FORM NAME SEr cA - 3 ( oc.-) TAPE v 7-J-CALIBRATION BLOCK S,A/ - /

REFLECTOR VV , '/S 7~ $ 2) N lb /ve/c /)

COUPLANT L< ( W% c/ # 4.-

_ 1 C-3 ?J 8 ANGLE ^/'6' '!M(/LW SEARCH UNIT # c.3 7,35 FREQUENCY /. O INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA:

i l I CH H i f i i l

I REFLECTOR

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, l* k h !j 0 7*l___________l______! ! I I l l I GAIN (dB) I31l 13 l 3

i l

i f

l l

'7 TOF (us) b l' ~

I h AMP (%FSH) l jk 6 l /c* '

l l ; , l l l i

CALIBRATION CHECKS:

rH c .> r I

IDATE i, +/e/o 7 . v/e/s7 l, l, l, i ,

l TIME ' C h 3{l /2: Y[ l l \

i ! I i

! I ' '

li CH k / l

, /

?

i l

l s

' REFLECTOR lti d [: !I Tl m fd M 'l l lF3 Y n:v 210 IC*I

?

V/X I

l i I I i cA l 06 l ._ ._ i l

OPERATOR v( M ~ s .-

_., . 3t LEVEL I OPERATOR _ /A-s[ Us g LEVEL I OP ERATOR,/ LEVEL A/d REVIEWED BY, [ LEVEL _ DATE 8'/~d Rev. 1, 4/1/87 3 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-5

i INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM EXAMINATION

SUMMARY

RECORD l Record # l 5ITE 1~203/9" wc / ear Powef /%c<v7' l ? G to O V -a-- l Tsio es SYSTEM # CBla REV V/P A3W C TOnM 4 7 - 3._

, EXAM AREA SKETCH:

' Note Sketch.

' 0 reference point Nominal thickness Scan X !

Y1,__ Xy22._._

! l area: 1 j i_____________________l,

! Configuration and !

1 surface conditioning l I, ,

1 i ,

i t

.t I t i

I i 1 I

i l i

I

SUMMARY

OF ANALYSIS RESULTS:

FORM FINDINGS COMMENTS I l

.sk vs, t., 7,2 m sms., < rac k > \

9, / 0, t I, } &- fp hd.beb% X: // c r2 (*

T c.u.

' ser .s, c,, s , , sy, .o.nn 1, a, cc i. i-

' l

____________._______________? _1_U_1___________________________

REMARKS:

1 I-OPERATOR ( /m <,[b M y LEVEL I DATE $ ~.b 47 LEVEL 7 DATE /-Sc-87 ANALYST \[ LEVEL I.

REVIEWED Y

/

f

'[ LEVEL DATE 8IO i

Rev. 1, 4/1/87 3 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-7

---__-_______-_____________.---______a

AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 870401 INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM EXAMINATION

SUMMARY
RECORD l Record #
SITE *7~Po.;is9a wc ten f Peaar<e JQ'o46 l Elo / d& V"d rnpe a SYSTEM # O d- @ REV,v/ #/9A/ . d_ PORM- (s 7~-d EXAM AREA SKETCH:
Sketch l Note 0 reference point Nominal thickness t
Scan X1,,, X 2.__ I l l area: Y1 y2 1,_____________________
Configuration and surface conditioning
SUMMARY
OF ANALYSIS RESULTS:
l FORM FINDINGS COMMENTS 8 11f. X: 5HJ'.' V:c.T rf:y? y
~
l_S E T+ 13,tv,15
>Q t} to,I9,30 ( /s%L-> Pf:DT ' .ct.3 I7lL g y z, (
X: DF JTf4 Ser io,11, i+ lE=T fIi - z>i. . t.?:-6Y:'. *!cwg crij l 13, i v, is, J G i, cT + Q . s'; 1 ni F w L-p> 55 = 1 t. P s'k l ( 0 Mc,a ) Df? : 3Jc cc # @A l TET fd. R ; F.re-))y ya.z " T+ = n.m REMARKS: (/Wid A 3(' M - R~T @ #'
OPERATOR '#t.r M 8 ^ ,,r LEVEL [ DATE C -So -8 7
/,J:>'_
m -
jc __.s LEVEL J DATE 8/-/O-cf~2 ANALYST n.e [ _ d y LEVEL [ DATE 9"S e 47 REVIEWED.BY Nf/ M/ LEVEL I DATE .5767
/
Rev. 1, 4/1/87 4 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-8 l
AMDATA ENG2NEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 870401 INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM CALIBRATION RECORD i Calibration # y l SITE 700J/9N Nuc //o' 1%re jQ'Ir / T~ l Record # 80 / dd V- Y l SYSTEM # O c3(0 REV[/[c RPP # CJ/ RDAS # CM Sarat** / (ZH)
FORM NAME rsrec 3 reg r) TAPE (s7-y CALIBRATION BLOCK SN-/
REFLECTOR '4 , #4 r SJ e ,JaNO s c h j l
COUPLANT 4< / Ma q/ t.-
~
t firo )
SEARCH UNIT # D h P5-/B7 FREQUENCY /. o ANGLE e/ 6 W LW I INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA:
Cu e , .
l REFLECTOR mnA 'brs2d GAIN (dB) ' gf , @/
TOP (us) M #E Y
~
AMP (%FSH) j 8/* #
l ! l CALIBRATION CHECKS:
.r H ou r-DATE y/,jf 7 j uj,jf 7 j l TIME //. J 6 /t. 72 t CH # l , l REFLECTOR mfel> . E7 Add, k 7 Jl.0 /* 5%; o.u V/X CT 0 71 g j OPERATOR NA LEVEL OPERATOR $_ hp,__ b ' -
LEVEL (
OPERATOR h< v [ ~ ~' [ LEVEL _7[
LEVEL [
REVIENED / 4'< / DATE ff /'ef 7
/
7 /
Rev. 1, 4/1/87 3 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-9
~
~~
'AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 870401
j. .
INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
RECORD l Record 8 l
, SITE rfb,Ti9N MUta r fe wer". /YANT l P & / D +'1' ~ W l SYSTEM # OJb. REV V/ # A v' C TAPca u r 'y' PORM EXAM AREA SKETCH:
Sketch Note 0 reference point Nominal thickness i '
i Scan X1 ,,, X2 ,,,
l- l area: Yi y2 i
Configuration and surface conditioning i
SUMMARY
OF ANALYSIS RESULTS:
'!- FORM FINDINGS COMMENTS i____________ ____________________________ _____________________
S*~r f * 'i &3 .fCYfi'+4, ( 9]o'&kew )
%& 7% : tt,,9o llldwa.lS <EI*'" . l Snr 2 -/,.3,$ Y: d,).r-3,3~
gg 72f* : 36. it'
.pr 70 3 -
___. . __ _ ____.&sp,_LO.,L,___ ____.________o __ __ ___._____ __ .
REMARKS:
L l
OPERATOR ( -, , 2'7' LEVEL DATE C-3o-#7 PM LEVEL M DATE 9'-Fo -d3-)
ANALYST sp -7 ^ y LEVEL d DATE 9-3 < M7 !
, REVIEWED'BY 8 dhf/ - ,
LEVEL DATE , 'f-/-8/
?
Rev. 1, 4/1/87 4 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-10
AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 670401 INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM CALIBRATION RECORD l Calibration 9 J j <
SITE 'f'PoyAA> n x /m ? A, < v P/2 ,q/,,w 7-- l l l Record 9 #6/d W -3__ l SYSTEM # OcP G REVdjc. RPP # 43/ RDAS # oh
.S EI' 2 0 6 3 ( Jiv) ur* C FORM NAME s,:r a et 7 ( o,q ) u r ~ 4, TAPE _ u 7' *5*G CALIBRATION BLOCK $N - /
.= 0 REFLECTOR '/4 Vg 7 SJM . No yc /3 COUPLANT u / R ,9 9 # L, n>,2c SEARCH UNIT # 2 3 M f5-/ 8'7 FREQUENCY /. O ANGLE 4'5' DW/LW INITIAL CALIBRATION DATA:
CH I i j l l
...___________.. .......__- ____ ._____ ______ ..._ _____..... I REFLECTOR ,mh l '6md 9f GAIN (dB) 'T-f l
' TOP (us) $7,6 2A4 l t
AMP (%FSH) f/,c fg CALIBRATION CHECKS:
5'd o u 7~
DATE '
g,j'g 7 j g,,g , '
TIME cf : If igl: it l s i !
CH # '
y l g 7
REFLECTOR di,){T rM, X1 l
" " 7% " '
v/x ,
l M !M l l ;;
l OPERATOR NA LEVEL A/A OPERATOR D Os& LEVEL f OPERATOR >< -
W LEVEL T REVIEWED BY
-- /
/M[ ,, -
LEVEL, / DATE j~~' / ~8[ ,
Rev. 1, 4/1/87 3 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-11
j AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION -NO. 870401 ,
~INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM 3 EXAMINATION
SUMMARY
. RECORD i l
l Record 9
, SITE 7~ftVr?u Anx /sor 1% ef AANT l T(s/ B& V ~5 SYSTEM # OcM REV V/ /> /G v',C. FORM 7AM d e., r %(o EXAM AREA SKETCH: i Sketch l Note
_____________________________________.___l_____________________
l ' 0 reference point l i
8 Nominal thickness !
l Scan Xi X2 l l l area: Yl ~ y2 - 1
!__________ _____ ____l 1 Configuration and surface conditioning l
i i t I. ,i .
' l
. I I !
SUMMARY
OF ANALYSIS RESULTS:
FORM FINDINGS COMMENTS 47-S
SerR r 7, g, 'i ,s57gt 7 ( p=,f ,y 10, //, 'a g , , z (, ' '
SET A- 7; & 'l y ; %. W W , {vf,)wa.]$ t h h*(l*'~
/0, it, i > /
ur-& SEr21d,11/,1b T5: ) 7 ifY ,
,6 '
a_s_e.r..e ,iaa_a _iL . _ >_P _!. ___ h
___~_r___ %_ .,. . __ _ . . __ _ . __ _
Hj /Si /v REMARKS:
l OPERATOR ,w [_ -
p-- LEVEL [ DATE 4-3* #7
/
[.,m -
LEVEL f DATE /-8(C-87 ANALYST n+d TN LEVEL 1 DATE 4 -3c D
. REVIEWED BY M/ -
4.& [
LEVEL. DATE 6 /' M .
Rev. 1, 4/1/87 4 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-12
sh
$ &/99 4/-6
'INTRASPECT/98 AUTOMATIC ULTRASONIC IMAGING SYSTEM.
LINEARITY CHECK RECORD SITE . )~foJAN NJc/t'aikw!R hlAN7~
SYSTEM NUMBER- [ N - REV,V/8 886'd
( 375 u SEARCH UNITL SN ' # M /5-/67 FREQUENCY /.d ANGLE Id g/LW h'sNA I. SCRE HEIGHT LINEARITY m sv M
I sis,vn L s't 100%- D.19- V7M 80% 7l N 3 9.1 Y 6'4% ~ SB .59 Ja.e/
'50%- SoI7 8 J 3. 9 /
40% 'd$. 9 Y cw 3 /
32%. 28 9/ / G . Yl 25% 9 V OS l'/. PY 20%' /?33 f/ 70' II. -AMPLITUDE: CONTROL LINEARITY Systen Gain Signal Amplitude File il File #2 File #3 File 64 Set 80% //, J'8
-6 dB 32-48% 3 0 7d-
-12 dB 16-24% / F. '15 Set 40% 36"9/-
+6 dB- 64-96% 78.od Set 20% /297
'+12 dB 60-90% 7/.of u
DATE N/ ' /#7 TIME /(. So .
CHECKED _BY hyls -[ O LEVEL 3 DATE 4[I 7 /.P 7 8 y 478 6~7 -6l' Rev 1, 4/1/87 1 of 4 I/98 Check Record Page B-13
n Summary of the Indications 1
Indlcation Form Tape _ Findings Number Name - X(in)- Y(In) TOF(us) Dp(In) Amp (S) Notes I. SET +8 UT-2 11.0-12.0 3.4 52.25 3.39 100 l.D.30' CLOCK 2 SET +16 UT-3 '3.5-4.5 - 0.8 53.40 3.48 100 1.0.90' CLOCK 3l SET + 16_ UT-3 5.75-6.25 0.9 53.40 3.48 69.3 1.D.90' CLOCK 1
L4- SET +17 UT-3 7.75-8.75 2.2 5475 3.60 82.7 1.D.90' CLOCK L 5 SET +18 UT-3 8.5-9.25 1.2 52.20 3.38- 85.04 1.D.9 0' CLOCK 6 SETR+4 UT-4 11.3 2.75- 36.15 2.03 100 270' MIDWALL 3.5 90' CLOCK L 7 SETR+9 UT-5 12.6 425- 27.65 1.32 100 90' MIDWALL 5.25 30' CLOCK l j a
g ga uz ~~n j ,a Wg- orv5 9' 4 4
<g- / ;
/[f af ara SN i
Page B-14 l
S: , s .. ;
.b 1
4' 1 L*- ,
. .h Appendix C INTRASPECT/98 CALIBRATION BIDCK :
RESULTS AND IMAGES fL Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
i I
INTRASPECT/98 UIP REV C.-RDAS Ett SC5032 0 N10AT A INC.. (C) 1987 0-20%
-TROJAN CAL BLOCK Stt-1 - FORtts CETCALS CHs 3 - 04/07/87 '12:43-12:44 21'30%
0.00* ->. =0.50' BY 0.25'
'., X :Ys'O.00* Ax! AL SCArt ANO: 45.00 GAINS 63.00 DB 31-39%
J
-> -4.60* BY 0.05" DACI 0FF. '.$K..eb 0.00 ti!NUS WELDS!DE 40 49%
AMPS 82.13% FSH MPs 1.15' J- 06TE DELAY WIDTH 60-60%
TOFs 21.70 US . = DP s . 0.82* . 'CDPs 0.79* 'A (US)" 12.00 48.00 61 69%
SC(X.Y)=( 0.00. -0.85) So=(- 0.92 ) e 1/2 U C (US)' '12.00 48.00 70 578%
~ >
w- . . 7s-es% 1
=
C- 90-100%
l
, m.- !
-( l aboP. , .
p*.
75 ...
.g , 'g g ' H 50 .' ~U ' ' '
25
,* , g . %,, @I s.
g- 4 hh v 'v ~ w 2
50 ' '
~
L WE N
,g 10GX Figure C-la. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration for 1/4T SDH with Harisonic Transducers, SN's C3735, C3738 l
l l
l Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-2 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1 l
i I
j
INTRASPECT/S8 UIP REV C RDAS Elly SC5032 D - MDAT A INC. . (C) 1987 0-20%
.'L-04/07/87 12:43-12144 21-30%
TROJAN
'X: 0.00"CAL-> BLOCK
-0.50" BSN-1 'Y 0.25*'u exteLFORrts scott ANGs SETCALS CH: 1 53.00 08 45.00.GA1Hi 31-39%-
'Ys~ 0.00' ->;' -4.50" BY 0.0S* DeC OFF ~ SK s 0.00 -flINUS WELDS!DE 40-49%
' AMPS 100.00% FSH f1P 8 - 1.98" ORTE- DELAY WIDTH 50-60%
TOFs ' 28.65 US- ' DP s 1.40" CDPt- 1.50* "'e (US) 12.00 48.00 61"69%'
SC(M.Y)=( O.00. -1.95)- S0=( -1.40 ) 8 1/2 U C (US)* 12.00' 40.00 70 78%
, -
79-09%
> 90-100%
. .;i .
a
- n .
50 ... . .
. l EA _, ] j 'j , A::g g .
- p .r
"' " V V~ "
rs -
100%
j Figure C-lb. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration for 1/2T SDH with Harisonic Transducers, SN's C3735/C3738 l
l l
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-3 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 i
1
, INTRASPECT/98 TROJAN CAL BLCCfUIP SN-1 REU C RDAS E11 SC6032 D AMDATA INC.. (C) 1987
- - FORMS SETCL11 CH: 1 04/07/C7 18:23-18873 0-20%
X: 21-30%
0.00* ->; -0.50' DY 0.25'
, AXIAL SCAN ANO: 45.00 GAIN: 53.00 De 31-33%
YI 0.00* -> -4.50^ BY 0.05' SK 2180.00 . F11NUS WELDS!DE 40-4sg
^ AMPS .31.34% FSH MPs 3.05' , --DACs -
0FF -ACATE - 1 DELAY W10TH TOFs 37.60 US: ' DP 8 2.15' CDPs .2.41' (US), ;12.00 48.00 50-60*4 SCCX.Y)=( 0.00. -1.30) SG=( '-2.16 ) ' 8 1/2 U ' C (US)- '12.00 48.00 61-63%
' 70-78%
e s
l. ,
78-89%
ff,i ,
90-100M
.wr . _ ,
c , s. , ,
~'
.n .'- '
4 ( . p., ,
tour. . . , . , .
75_ ; 'n >
o
.-)
.fggl f R.
2s L
~] .
uy y .y y.
s 7,. ,
, c ^ +
Figure C-lc. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration on 3/4T SDH with Ilarisonic Transducers, SN's C3735, C3738 4
l I
i l
i Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-4 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
INTRASPECT/98 UIP REV C ROAS Ett SC5032 0 Ar1 DATA INC.. (C) 1987 TROJAN CAL BLOCK SN-1 O-20%
Xs- 0.00* -> =0.50" BY 0.25' FORMS SETCAL9 CH: 1 04/07/87 12:43-12:44 21-30%
Ys- 0.00* -> -4.50BY 0.05" Ax!AL SCAN ANGs 45.00 DAINs 53.00 08 31-39%
AMPS 90.55% FSH F1P s 3.99" DACs OFF .J-SK s 0.00 N!NUS WELDSIDE
~
40-49%'
TOFI ' 45.55 Us . DPs 2.58' DATE DELAY W!OTH go.60%
SC(x.Y)=(
CDPs 3.22' 'A (US) 12.00 n 48.00 0.00.'-2.70)' S0=( 2.82 ) e 2/2 U C (US) 12.00 48.00 61-69%
70-78%
79-89%
90-100%
y , ,
16 %
75 - ,
~ '
./ .
gV .
VU g ~ ~
~
PV 76 ,
100%
Figure C-ld. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration on Saw-Cut Notch with Harisonic Transducers, SN's C3735, C3738 f
l Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-5 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
i INTRASPECT/98 UIP RW C RDAS Ett SC5032 0 ArtDATH INC.. (C) 1987 . . 0-20%
TROJAN CAL. BLOCK - <,.-; F(Rrts SETRCL1 CH: 1 - 04/10/87 11:26-11:27 21-30%
. Xs 0.00" -> -0.50" BY 0.25" . AxlAL SCAN..ANO: 45.00 OAINs 49.00 DB 31-39%
Ya'. 0.00" -> --4.50" BY 0.05 DAC8 0FF, 'SK s 0.00'ti!NUS WELOSIDE 40-4s%
SCCX.Y)=(
U 0!I'O 0.00.' -0.75)
- CDP '. 0.67' -
SDN . 0.72 > 4 1/2 U S)
C (US) 2$ N 12.00- 48.00 hM 70-78%
p. 79-83%
I2 '
90-100%
l _
a g'a
{,ll.
t'
.c 100k' ' ,
s 75 A a bA A /\
2$_.. *" " Y V' Iy V U y"yUU GO 75 100%- '
b Figure C-2a. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration on 1/4T SDH with RTD Transducer, SN 85-187 l-Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-6 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 i
1 INTRA $PECT/98 UIP REU. C Mr:3T111- SC6032 0 AMDATA INC.. (C) 1987 0-20%
' TROJAN CAL. BLOCK . . FORn SETRCL1 CHl.1 04/10/67 11:26-11:27 21-30%
- Xs 0.00* -): ~0.50"'BY 0.25" Ax!AL CCAN ANO: 45.00 GAIN: 48.00 08 31-39%.
Ys 0.00* ->~ -4.50" BY 0.05" DACs OFF SK : 0.00 F11NUS WELOS!DE 40-49%
' AMPS 100.00% FSH' r1P: GATE . DELAY- WIOTH TOFs 28.35 US DPs 1.95" . . CDPs -1.47" ,. A (US) 1.38" 12.00' 48.00 50-60%'
SC(X.Y)=( O.00. -2.00) $0=( l'.38 ) 8 1/2 0 > C (US) 12.00 48.00 61 69%
70 78%
re-es%
so-scox 1 4
i 5Y i
i l
1007..
z.~7 -
'7 7s .
50 3; *,
28 0
n ., AAi A' bAkhA A 11 /\ .A ,
, v " Y y v vv 4 l "v y v v y y v y 50 y 76:
100%'
Figure C-2b. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration on 1/2T SDH with RTD Transducer, SN 85-187 Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-7 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
I l
INTRASPECT/98 UIP REV C RDAS Ett SC5032 0 AMDATA !NC.. (C) 1987 .-
0-20%
TROJAN CAL. BLOCK' - FORns SETRCL2 CH 1 04/10/87 10

51-10:52 21-30%-
X4- 0.00* -> ~0.50" DY 0.25" Ax!AL SCAN ANO: 45.00: CAIN: 48.00 08 31-39%'
- Ys 0.00" -> ' DAC OFF. SK s180.00 MINUS WELOS!OE 40-49%'
- AMP 100.00% FSH, -4.50" o NPBY s 0.05" 2.96" . ~ : '. GATE s . DELAY 'WIOTH ea . a~ * '
TOF

36.85 US DP + 2.09" , CDP ' 2.33" a (US)' 12.00.- 48.00 jy[y SC(X.Y)*( 0.00. -2.05)'. SD=( -2.03 )- 8-1/2 U C (US) -12.00 - 48.00 70-78%
, *3 X 79-89%
,' l p? 90-100%
a-1W%
-[ i.
~
75 q ' g -- -
alp 00 %p,.
50 i I V'l( 4 v ' ,
2s g.. g j jg j ,g A g g fg g :lf(3}
.j .. A A j
2s / v v m ya I gvvycyvv 7'v v- v rs l(
\\
s y.
100'4
)
Figure C-2c. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration on 3/4T SDH with RTD' Transducer, SN 85-187 i 1
1 l
l Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-8 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
INTRASPECT/98 O!P REV C RDAS Ett SC5032 0 ANDATA INC.. (C) 1987 O-20%
TROJAN CAL. BLOCK .
- FORfts SETRC3.1 CHI 1- 04/10/87 11:26-11827 21-30%
XI 0.00* -> -0.50' BY 0.25".- AXIAL SCAN - AN0s 45.00 GAIN 49.00 00 21-30%
'Ys- 0.00*'-> 2~4.00* DY 0.05" DAC s OFF - E
'KE4 0.00 n!NUS WELDS!DE 40 4s%
AMPS 1 81 10% FSH r1P s . 3.99" ' OATE DELAY. WIDTH S0-60%
TOFs*- 45.55 US- DPs 2.68* < . ' CDP s 4 3.22 A (US) 12.00 48.00 g3.g33 SC(X.Y)=(< 0.00.'-3.25) $0=(. 2.82 ) 9 2/2 Ut 1 C (US) 12.00 '48.00 70-70%
^ 79-89%
jf,i'... 1 90-100M
, {
', 17 1a 1 .. .w .
76 ;?
g 2s 9 ;gg y y&y. Qll Q ,g
!('
2s :
50 .
N QV \/ 7 \/v V ' V,
. \/ y V;V y] v v g V v v Vt 75
[
y' ,.,.
100%
Pigure C-2d. IntraSpect/98 Image of Calibration on Saw-Cut Notch with RTD Transducer, SN 85-187 i
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-9 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 t
a
S n 0 V
I
- s u O M 0 5
i 1 9
D
/
n 7 i i 7 0 H 8 - . . . . . .
0 0 G 2 4 .
4 I E E 7 0 .
5 H V D / 8
.... . * - - . . - . . . .= .
G A O 6 1
0' 1 .
i N Y W M 7 .
I G . 5 5 O P R L U 5 .
~ R E A M
N U H E L R 4 4 8 D
Z D E F T I. 3 . , .
T . .
_ 2 R B
- t_ n n 1 T 2
d . . - .. .
. i i 4 .
B / 4 . ; .. .. .
. 9 7 % s 1 * - . . - . . .
6 9 2 u + . .
n z .-
7 / - . .
i H 2 1 n T :
M i C uB 0 E d .
0 1 T H L 0 L 5 . . .
0 R T E 5 E :
A D V 2 S E0
. 0 T I E 2, L7 Y
R E
S W L Y R
0 . .
A T E E E O F L L T T T L M E g t g,t 4 i l E I A A A E E R0 g n0
. D F G G G V M 9 I
U a .
I D -
. .. . - . . - . . . = .
. :.: ...' ..: /
. n .
i . . . . . . . . .
4 .
. . . 0 .
. : . .- 1
. . 8 .
7 .
6 .
. . 8 .
D
... . . . . . - - . . = . .
. T 0
B . .
h d . . - . . - . . . . . , . . .
. 7 .
T .
. 2 8 . , . .
6 .. .. . : I ... . * - - . - . * .
_. i . . :
. I .
4 . - . . . . . .
YBd .
. . _' i.5 0 .
. . . 7 .
F 1 i F
E >u-3
<a< E0 n gl lQ ,- i ,I 0
i 1 i
R
, e M.<, "- 1),5 1 1
.am@ ntHo ,4 o g.a UU%Qte03 h
r Mgmon,- e 4
T ,
t, p- ,1 s 9 s l ,.1
.i i
) '.
_, .
8 t
3/4T. RTD 8C-78 y
RE,1 0'4 .
REF 70.5dB ~
- 9.4dB 3 1.04 in/DIU !
0 01 I
7 1 . . . .
80i . . .
i .
i .
60i -
stc s . .
e >
40i. ......... .
g . . . , .
. .. . c. .
20i.....
0!n.t N .j.
.._.'.li . .diAAallkh.A.d s= 2.90 in. += 2.05 in, 4= 2.05 in Figure C-3b. Manual Calibration on 3/4T SDH with RTD Transducer, SN 85-78 l
l 1
l' 1
l l
l i
I 1
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C.-Il Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1 i
l i
i
]
i .
)
S n 0 l
M i 1Y 9 s H 0 l u O 5 9Y D . - ,. * * * : . .
7 7 u 0 H 8Y -
0 0 G 2 t
. . . . . = - .
4 E E 5
I 7Y -
. n.
3 H V D / . - . .
t i 1 G A O ' 6Y 4 .
c . -
u C N Y W M 0 8 . * . - ' - .*' . .,
I G 5Y - 1 -
- . . C
. O P R L U 5 5 . -
4 R M E L R 4 4Y 8 . . . . * - .
. . . - w 8 E A H U H -
a a
- Z D E F T 4 3Y D - .
5 T
. : S -
8 2Y R . * . . - - * .- -
- d D n n 1 Y . . -
n T i i T
4 n.
a R E -
/
4 6 7 % s 1 H
n z 1
. 9 2 7
u +4 '
. - . . [
D I / -
4 i H 3 1 n T -
- .. S4 _
M i C .- -
8
( 0 I@ . . - . . - . . . . - .
- a 0 5 T H L 0 I +# - .
DP .
T5
~
0, 0 R T E 5 . -
A D V 2 Sll ?. * ,-
- . . , 28 I I 0 T I E 2 I *.
. /
Y E R S W L YI l* 1N 0 RA k r a - . .
S R T E E E O - .
h L L T T T L M= -
' E I A A A E E f' -
= T ,
,0 i.
1 D F G G G U MY [0 i gI I 0 i ,I 0
s i i I0 s.. 4 r _
E0 6 4 2 /e 1c u
nd os _
n na or
, iT t
aD rT l
bR
- i
- n 1 1
lh j._
t i
l' n at I
. : ..- . : i
.- i
. - . - * . -**' . . , . Ci
" . h .
w
- l 7 i ah uc i . - . .
4 .: ' . . : .. = i . -
. . nt _
ao l
8
. -- " 4
+ MN j
5 G
n 4 . . . - - .
D -
. i 8 -
n .
- e.
T . .
. 5
. . c R .
- " 8
. 3 _
h
.I
' y
. F c p J " T - . . - . = - -
C _
t - . 2 - . _
a e
/ . .
N a
= 1
--*'. r
+ -
. * . .. - - * - - . , . =
u
% l -
4 g 0 _ -
- n - -
n. i 1 - . . - . . . .
ai " . i -
F
.- 9 b
i.
. 9 :-
, >Z : - : l
); ! t
" . E'i . . - . . - - .
/
.i'b
= -
',ii i,1 ,,i,t .
0 .,1 -
=
,0,s.
IE 0 0 0s .
,g 1
('
9 8 6 ,~ 2 0 I
1 0 ig I0 i i I 0 0 w.
6 4 54 8 o$' = g3m n oEw 0 poa 2g oMr sxw(w x.? "' ," mo,e
=
3/4T. RTD 85-84 REJ 0%
REF 66.3dB - 6.5dB 1.04 in/DIV 00i .
. 1 i ,
i
80i' .- .-
\
.- n
~.""}~ .
s . . .
pyg............ ....... .. ............. . ..
40i..... . . ..
1 . . . 1
[g;
. i e
Od,,
b= 4,W i n, + = Z , U 5 i n. 1. + 0= in Figure C-3d. Manual Calibration of 3/4T SDH with RTD Transducer, SN 85-84 l
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-13 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 f I
.l
==us
> e.n c o e -e Z *-4 *M' a% ,y, x o .. . ......... . - ..
c
. ;$ c b, > Ch X .!
7 ,,, . . .
c3 o I - C D "x; '
u') . . . '
o C'4 w
w L.D.e e- LnJ W tu X l
o. .O ~> . .
C Z Q %
. -* 83 C O o
C X. .. . ....
4J
- 3- 3 E o # . .
O o .Z
-4 so - tt) X. *
, D O Q (4 J D b-) * * * * *
U W
cr E : :
t a
C
._J C4
v X, 8 . .
'g LAJ Z D Z *
, bJ Q W La F- *** P*> *M # .. - - . .. ... -..
g ea lw Q
' m g"
cg -
o c
. c* ; . . .
g C
e e g g. ,f, E F g
E C N
C- m ('*4 ::::E t* -t % % i Tw % * ;
+ .
E e4 .- c S-. .
, C3 E **
. . . . ; g)
Q3 c> 'LAJ
52".:
LA
.'U o, c,
w F-cc T
t- w>
J c) u,
. J*
w a'. ..:. ... ....
E-e n '
C 04 4/8-~ ,
.*D .:::> F- C.-*
04 8' ' N e-
D CM 8)*e 3 La.8 8 ?- % ' . N e-
.%. CEs . . c.s i C'
,j La.J F- W La 14J i::>
O g
La_ J F- F.J- F- J E iI . .a *E LaJ ff.
w O LA e T 4.3 T
40 C w 1.3 R LAJ E 7' IC
C
'P
'O
- C-
'O C
Y C
3 C ' E4 W2
%.V e-t C&
OC '
L C :'
O 'C e'4 0 4J f.
gn i La L !
m DV j 3
Q ... ...
,1 <
25 N e+.c )
x c
~ s
. 3-
.al U ., j
~ . . ...
.. . : * - - *
3
y. =.
= ,
i -
.-t e .L c9 ..-
, Y f3L g -
, ~
-: Cs
. , : g ec p
. . : . . . E2 e
. J, .
c *
u Q
O d [
\ F g CQ
- *** ;a a
>~ D a
n u a a
a i
i5-
E * ' ' ' ' : * * ' ' ' ' * *'&
,g:
C. .
,2, 0 l F . ;
==
i g D ... . ...., .... .... . . . q) j H : % .
Le 2
. . . e * -
i
+ :* ,, i . . ..
y p
yt co . O
4
o. m .......... :
o :
m
i
'sc
,,o . . . .. .. . .
Q
. \
d- .2--i b.3.-
cco
,g-co
.k-so w ei b.e,-
e c>
.s o>
- - Sos - .s e
- os .5 - o
I r
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-14 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 j
1
l l
l l
3/4T. RTD 85-118 REF 66.1dB - 5.2d8 1.04 in/viv 0 01 . . . . . .
l l . c . .
I -
l . .
og,.....
W .
l .
l ' '
t .
l .
l - ,' . .
ggi. ..... . .... ... .... . . ... .... ..
l - 4 40i. . . ..... . . ..
I I . . . .
l * *
f . .
0 .. E dv.hl
: 4ifV i A. 4: 2.0.JiA 4: 2.U J iA l
Figure C-3f. Manual Calibration on 3/4T SDH with RTD Transducer, SN 85-118 l
f l
l l
l l
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page C-15 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l
)
v Appendix D SKETCHES OF THE ELBOW 7VD CALIBRATION BLOCK I
j i
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page D-1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
~
O
5CAN
, =
/80* ,$CAN' -=
FL6W =
/ 4D. PL,4 7~E 37~EAM GEA /ERA 7~Ck
-/2" HC 7" k' ' lW ser-p tr-z a f .scr-s,o ser-LEG 0', Mr O' '** o *^90' 3> 4 O f 0:se
s. -
~. -
~
sere 5,d.
.3 o' iso
SET +/,2 SE7~+ //,18 SE r+ 9,/d kr+
gge o', isd o , see s' 180'
,,,., 3, +
' - 7, g 0: /8f ,-
o,.,y /
s
/. V.4CCES5d84<
.4REAS L
[ 3 O'CLdCK 3/DE
~
h Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page D-2 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1
_=. _
i Ji 270' SCAN 90' SCA/V h
FLdh/ =
l l
/. D . iDd d 7 g MEAM :
GEA/ERM 7 os
\
/ ig" M-
/S, 14 /
~
A~ ~
Ax
k' # ~ \.St rR -
1 0a -
$ m 90'g7e*/3e~rR- ,//,/tI gn l so'e25\ eo,' ne'
.l I
DM,/+ IL/._. _:-=__Lj f
i i s, s
<_ 's ix s N t
/ '
serx+ I.serc +e, # scre +4 alstra +
'l /Ss/4 Y' 9d*g7o0 \ 9,jo gg *, g fg * '
I,' \i so"ers Q f*Jf
~ s
' ,' d '__<a '
l s
's.,[_
M'KCESSABLd~ f I
A'REAS
\
i I ;.
3 6 CLOCK 3/DE Rev. 2, 5/4/87- Page D-3 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
f c ,
I i . )'
2
(.
O' SCAA/ =
/86* SCAN =
FLd// =
5 TEAM FA/EA94 7~6.9
+/2 #
' - .No 7~
~ -
ggg SER SET +/S,/6 str +
/3, /4 C*,/80* SET /$,20 0 d*, /80' /?:/8 Q *, /8d*
~~ g,g.
I
%. N %
\-
SE 7- 9, /d $ff- //,/f Sf7* SfT'/S s /4
,,g !! c',/80* C*,/80' /3,/4 Q*,/80* t
.. ~
0*, /8/ /
^ s
' x. , ' i 3-s.' ;
...,. N N _
q
/A44CCESSA8Lf
.4RfAS }
j 9 O ' CL OCM S/DE l
i. l l
i Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page D-4 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
o g,g ,
270' SCAAI 9
.5 TEAM N 5g7g+5, &
I seumroe go , ero-
/
~ I '
ss l\
Scrk+I SEr.e+3)\' P Sfr##
\
\
6" '
gf gers, \
l\ Sd;2M'\
li I \ so'O e70
'~7 L ', /
L g; ', _y .y -
i i, .
-g \ 4 3672-/,2 SE72-3,4\ \ SE72-7,8
,,g W
N 90$f70*
90' 270' \l
~
9 0 ', f 7 0 * '
90'2
,t ' i l
_4_ ,
yvA6CESSA8L E q
[
AREAS '
i L.
96'CL C CK SiD' E Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page D-5 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
A 0 Y. - 4f 2r 0
5 I h
/,
i
=
I
.w .
=
.o c .
5 7 5 c K 7 3 C S O
L .
4_
l B g g
L A = 7., ~ =
C 0 f 9 1 A
E 0 G 5 -
,I 2
P
=
d
/
4 P
=
E\r
?y" <R$ l ? ;8E .EE3~S w.
?
n?
' f ;'
Appendix E
INTRASPECT/98 SETUP' FORMS FOR CALIBRATION AND INSPECTION l
l l
1 1
1
l 1
=
[i 1:
1.
4 I
i
. 'I i I
'1 i
q Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 u o
INTRASPECT/98 SETUP FORM FOR CALIBRATION GENERAL INFORMATION Revision of. DMS VIP REV C DAS RDAS E11 of. Scan Controller SC5032 D FORM VIP REV D HP-Serial Number 2515A51021 Formnemr. SETCAL9 Form Creation Date 04/07/87 Exam Date 04/07/87 Form Creation Time 12:43:32 Exam. Time 12:43:59 to 12:44:46 Organization Amdata Inc Parsonnel YZ BS RK ASME Code and revision ASME SECTION-XI Specimen identifier TROJAN CAL BLOCK SN-1 Type, configuration PIPE Form, material SCSS Surface condition GOOD Thickness, inches 2.700 Outer diameter, inches 35.375 Track diameter, inches 35.375 Reflector SDH NOTCH CONTROL INFORMATION Acquire RF data Peak type Maximum Scan pattern Axial
. Inspect region, inches From To Interval Axial ' O.00 -4.50 0.05 ,
Circumferential 0.0 -0.50 0.25 Weld side Minus Scan velocity, inch /sec X-axis 1.00 Y-axis 1.00 i Channel # 1 2 3 4 Gain, dB 53.00 37.00 37.00 37.00 DAC amplifier Off Off Off Off Setup #- 1 2 3 4
'A-scan Delay, us 12.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 A-scan Width, us 48.00 12.80 12.80 12.80 ,
C-scan Delay, us 12.00 26.40 26.40 26.40 !
C-scan Width, us 48.00 6.40 6.40 6.40 Samp rate, MHz 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 Number wave avg 1 1 1 1 l
Rev. 2, 5/4/87- Page E-2 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1
MULTIPLEXER RPP Channel # Firing order 1 0 0 0 v- V v v uses Setup # 1 2 3 4 v v v v and stores data in File # 1 2 3 4 v v v v I
using compression method 0 0 0 0 Run length encoding enabled if 10__ consecutive samples are less than 25 %FSH 1
SEARCH UNITS Channel # 1 2 3 4 TX Manufacturer HARISONIC Panametrics Panametrics Panametric {j TX Model DUAL A534S A534S A534S TX Serial number C3738 P50544 P50544 P50544 TX Frequency, MHzl.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 TXInspect angdeg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 )
TX Mode LONGITUDINAL Shear Shear Shear j TX Wedge delay us12.0 8.0 .8 . 0 8.0 j 1
RX Manufacturer HARISONIC Panametrics Panametrics Panametric I RX Model- DUALS A534S A534S A534S RX Serial number C3735 P50544 P50544 P50544 RX Frequency, MHz1.00 2223 2.25 2.25 I L
RX Inspect angdeg45.0 45.' 45.0 45.0 l RX Mode LONGITUDINAL Shirr Shear Shear RX Wedge delay us12.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 l
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-3 Trojan Inspection Re c ort, IR252 1
i
" t i
SEARCH-UNITS-(continued)
. Channel'# 1: 2 3 4 Inspection tech Pitch-catch Pulse-echoTX Pulse-ech'TX o . Pulse-echoT Skewfang, deg 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Veloc, mils /us 238- 121 121 121
~
lTrans:OffXl inch 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Trans OffY inch 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0-
.Couplant Ultraael-I PULSER
Manufacturer and model AMDATA RPP Serial number 021 l
' Channel #' 1 2 3 4
_ Pulse Width ns 3JLQ 200 10Q Q 200 Pulse' amplitude 300 volts Filter# 1 Q_u_t 2' O.g_t 3 Qut
.. Filter'#1 4.0 MHz low cass _
' Filter #2 8.0 MHz low pass
' Filter #3. 0.5-MHz hiah pass RECEIVER
'! Manufacturer and model AMDATA
. Serial number 025 Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-4 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
V I
SCANNER Manufacturer and model Amdata 2090 Serial number 036 X-axis Y-axis Resolution, steps / inch 352' 305 Encoder rate, pulses / inch 127- 208 Seek velocity inches /sec 1.0 1.0-Closed loop control,: inches 0.200 0.200 Mount position, inches 0.00 0.00
' I, i
l COORDINATE SYSTEM DEFINITIONS Axis'1 X-circum Units Inches Zero ref N/A Plus. direct Clockwise facina downstream
.. c' Axis 2' Y-axial Units Inches Zero ref F/A Plus direct- Flow arrow Axis 3 Z-skew l Units. Dearees !
p .Zero ref Scanner plus v-axis j
)
Plus direct Clockwise viewed from above l 1
f l
{
) Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-5 Trojan' Inspection Report, IR252 j
i
,s
.f'
)
DISPLAY PARAMETLRS A-scan, . FULL wave rectified or'RF- RE_
- B-scan, . FULL or HALF wave rectified FULL C -ecan, :curcor-. length in waves. 150-C-scan. horizontal:labe11 cire C-scan vertical' label Axial C-SCAN ~di' splay AMPLITUDE-
- Strokes' saved 2 2 2 2' COLOR PALETTE Colors 1 - 3 BLACK BROWN RED R- G B R G .B R G B 0 Q.00- 0.00 0.45 0.25 0 0.8 0 -0 Colors 4 - 6 ORANGE ORANYELLOW YELLOWORAN R- G .B R G B R G B-
1 0.4Q 0 0.98 0.6 0 1.0 0.80 0 L Colors 7 - 9
' YELLOW WHITE SATURATED R, G B R G B R G B
1. 0 ... 1.0 0.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 l
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-6 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
) - -
'P 4-AMPLITUDE MAP
. Amplitude units BINARY
. Colors 1 ,3 BLACK BROWN RED O' 21_ 25_, 37 38 49 Colors 4 - 6
' ORANGE ORANYELLOW YELLOWORAN 50 12_ 63 75 76 87 Colors 7 - 9.
YELLOW WHITE .S_6TURATED 88 91_ 10,LQ 11_3_ LlA J_27 TIME-OF-FLIGHT MAP Amplitude threshold 2_0_ q %FSH TOF units 3 GATE: %A-cate Colors 1 - 3 BLACK BROWN RED 100 90 90 80 80 70 Colors 6
-ORANGE ORANYELLOW YELLOWORAN 70 k,Q 60 50 50 40
Colors 7 - 9 L YELLOW WHITE SATURATED 40 _
30 30 5 5 0
}
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-7 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
)
c CALIBRATION DATA Equipment Cal. Block TROJAN CAL. BLOCE S/N 1 Ref.Refl'O Temp. 122 Raf. Block SAME AS CAL. S/N O Ref.Refl:0 Temp. 801 SCREEN HEIGHT LIN'EARITY Procedure AMDATA #861224 Gatel-(near) Gate 2 (far)
Delay, us 26.00 32.00 Width, us 6.40 6.40 Indication 100 % 80 % 64 % 50 % 40 % 32 % 25 % 20 %FS Signall 99.22 80.47 64.06 51.56 41.41 32.81- 28.13 21.88 Signal 2. 53.91 41.41 31.25 26.56 22.66 16.41 12.50 10.16 S1/S2 1.84 1.94 2.05 1.94 1.83 2.00 2.25 2.15 Signal 2 shall equal 50% of Signall-(+/-) 5 %oof FSH CALIBRATION DATA (continued)
AMPLITUDE CONTROL'LINEARITY Procedure- AMDATA #841213 File # 1 2 3 4 System Signal gain amp % % % %
SET. 80% S,5.16 0 0 0
-6 db 32-48% A2_11_ 0 0 0
-12 db 16-24% 23.44_ 0 0 0
' SET 40% 42.91 0 0 0
+6 db 64-96% 85.94 0 0 0 h . SET 20% 23.44 0 0 0
+12 db- 64-96% 85.94 0 0 0
. DEPTH CALIBRATION h Depth of reflector D1 0.50 inches D2 1.00 inches
)
j Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-8 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
DISTANCE AMPLITUDE CORRECTION DELAY in clock periods from A-scan delay AMP is unsigned binary, 0 - 255, 0 = .5v, 128 = Ov, 255 = .5v Channel 1 2 3 4 DELAY AMP DELAY AMP DELAY AMP DELAY AMP
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0 DAC clock rate 5 MHz DAC lag 75 usec REMAPJCS SCAN-1 This is the initial cal, data This cal, block has 3 S.D.H.s and a raw saw-cut circ. notch.
l Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-9 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
WELD PROFILE
(-) (+)
Weld type: ELBOM ----FLOW---> ELBOW Weld joint: Circumferential Weld configuration profile 1 (Type 0,1,2,3 and 4)
Up (-) Dn (+)
Material thick (in.)-
2.700 2.700 Center line (in.) 0.00 Crown width (in.) 0.0 )
Crown height (in.) p.0 Taper (Y/N)? E (if yes then proceed as follows)
Taper length (in.) 0.00 Taper height (in./+/-) 0.00 Taper "0" reference C/L (C/L, UP, DOWN edge of weld)
( If C/L then proceed as follows )
Taper Start (in.) Stop (in.) ,
0.00 [Up(-)) 0.00 [Down(+)]
l i
l
)
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-10 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
INTRASPECT/98 SETUP FORM FOR EXAMINATION GENERAL INFORMATION l Revision of DMS VIP REV C DAS RDAS E11 of Scan Controller SC5032 D FORM VIP REV D HP Serial Number 2515A51021 Formname SET +8 Form Creation Date 04/08/87 Exam Date 04/08/87
. Form Creation Time 10:45:10 Exam Time 10:52:44 to 10:57:46 Organization Amdata Inc Personnel YZ BS RK ASME Code and revision ASME SECTION-XI Specimen identifier LOOP-2 ELBOW 3 O' CLOCK Type, configuration ELBOW Form, material SCSS Surface condition AS CAST Thickness, inches 3.375 Outer diameter, inches 35.00 Track diameter,inchet 35.00 Reflector INDICATIONS '
1 CONTROL INFORMATION Acquire RF data Peak type Maximum Scan pattern Axial Inspect region, inches From To Interval Axial 0.00 5.00 0.10 Circumferential 0.00 12.0 0.25 Weld side Minus ]
Scan velocity, inch /sec X-axis 1.00 Y-axis 1.00 Channel # 1 2 3 4 l Gain, dB 5_6.00 57.00 57.00 57.00 l DAC amplifier Off Off Off Off Setup # 1 2 3 4 L A-scan Delay, us 12.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 A-scan Width, us 48.00 12.80 12.80 12.80 C-scan Delay, us 50.00 26.40 26.40 26.40 ]
1 C-scan Width, us 10.00 6.40 6.40 6.40 -
{
Samp rate, MHz 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 Number wave avg 1 1 1 1 Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-ll Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1
MULTIPLEXER RPP Channel #-Firing order 1 2 0 0 v v v v uses Setup # 1 2 3 4 v v v v and stores data in File # 1 2 3 4 v v v v using compression method a2 2 g Run length encoding enabled if 10 consecutive samples are less than 25 %FSH SEARCH UNITS Channel # 1 2 3 4 TX Manufacturer HARISONIC Panametrics Panametrics Panametric TX Model DUAL A534S A534S A534S TX Serial number C3738 P50544 P50544 P50544 TX Frequency, MHzl.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 TXZnspect angdeg 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 TX Mode Longitudinal Shear Shear Shear TX Wedge delay us12.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 RX Manufacturer HARISONIC Panametrics Panametrics Panametric 4 RX Model DUAL A534S A534S A534S RX Serial number C3735 P50544 P50544 P50544 RX Frequency, MHz1.00 2.25 2.25 2.25 i RX Inspect angdeg45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 RX Mode Longitudinal Shear Shear Shear l
RX Wedge delay us12.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 V
)
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-12 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1
n _. _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _
i 1
SEARCH UNITSL(continued) ,
Channel:#: 1 2 3. 4. l Inspection tech Pitch-catch Pulse-echoTX Pulse-echoTX- Pulse-echoT ;
Sksw ang, deg' :180 0.0 0.0 0.0 Voloc,-mils /us 238 121 '121 121-Trans OffX inch 0.0: 0.0 220 0. 0-
!Trans OffY inch 0.0- 0.0- 0.0 0.0 LCouplant < Ultracel' l
)
j j
I l
PULSER Manufacturer and model AMDATA RPP Serial number 021 Channel # 1 3 4 .i Pulse' Width ns 222 22Q 222 222 l Pulse amplitude 300 volts l
Filter # 1 Qui 2 991 3 Q_qt
_ Filter #1- 4.0 MHz' low cass ;
. Filter #2 8.0 MHz low cass Filter #3 0.5 MHz hiah oass b RECEIVER
) . Manufacturer and model AMDATA 'l" h.
iSerial" number 025 .
\
Rev. 2, 5/4/87- Page E-13 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 o
SCANNER Manufacturer and model Amdata 2090 Serial number 036 X-axis V-axis Resolution, steps / inch 352 305 Encoder rate, pulses / inch 12' 208 Seek velocity inches /sec 1.0 1.0 Closed loop control, inches 0.200 0.200 Mount position, inches 0.00 0.00 l
l i
l COORDINATE SYSTEM DEFINITIONS Axis 1 X-circum Units Inches Zero ref Refer to drawina Plus direct Clockwise facina downstream Axis.2 X-axial '
l Units Inches Zero ref Refer to drawina Plus direct Flow arrow Axis 3 Z-skew Units Dearees Zero ref Scanner plus v-axis Plus direct Clockwise viewed from above
)
l l
l Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-14 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1
.L 4
' {p r
DISPLAY PARAMETERS _.
s A- scan, :FULLtwave rectified ' or RF RF B-scan,'.: FULL or HALF wave rectified FULL '
C-scan, cursor length in waves 150- )
-?
C-scan'. horizontal label'- Circ C-scan vertical label ~ Axial- ,, d.
C-SCAN display AMPLITUDE
' Strokes' saved' 48 .2 _ 2 2 a
,?, .
i
' COLOR PALETTE Colors 1 - 3' BLACK D.ROWN RED R G B R' G B R G B 0 0.00- 0.00 0.45 0 35 0 0.8 0 0 Colors 4 - 6' ,
-ORANGE ORANYELLOW YELLOWORAN R G B R- G B R G B l' O.40 0' O.98 0.6 0- 1.0 0.80 0
' Colors 7 - 9
! YELLOW- WHITE SATURATED U R .G B R G -B R G B
1. 0 ~- 1.0 . 0 '. 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0- 0.0 1.0 Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-15 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l 1
e P
AMPLITUDE MAP Amplitude units BINARY Colors.l'-13 BLACK BROWN RED 0 2.4._ - 2.5_, 37 )8 49 Colors 4' ORANGE ORANYELLOW YELLOWORAN 52_.- #2_, 63 75 76' 87 i
Colors 7 'd YELLOW WHITE SATURATED 88' 99 10Q 1,1) lli 127 o
(6,
'(
TIME-OF-FLIGHT MAP Amplitude threshold 5 %FSH a
'TOF units' % GATE: %A-aate Colors 1 - 3 BLACK BROWN RED 100 90- 90 80 80 70 Colors 4 - 6 ORANGE- ORANYEL1QW YELLOWORAN 70 60 60 50 50 40
' Colors 7 - 9 L -.
YELLOW WHITE SATURATED
) 40 30 30 5 5 0 V ,
1 J
Rev. 2', 5/4/87 Page E-16 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 o l
l. .$ -
i,
l-l CALIBRATION DATA Equipment Cal. Block TROJAN CAL. BLOCK S/N 1 Ref.Refl Notch Temp. 80.
Ref. Block N/A S/N 0 Ref.Refl 0 Temp. 80.
SCREEN HEIGHT LINEARITY Procedure AMDATA #841213 Catel (near) Gate 2 (far)
Delay, us 26.00 32.00 Width, us 6.40 6.40 Indication 100 % 80 % 64 % 50 % 40 % 32 % 25 % 20 %FS Signall 99.22 80.47 64.06 51.56 42 41 32.81 28.13 21.88 Signal 2 53.91 fl.41 11.25 26.56 22.66 16t Al_ 12.50 10.16 S1/S2 1.84 1.94 2.05 1.94 1.83 2.00 2.25 2.15 Signal 2 shall equal 50% of Signall (+/-) 5 % of FSH CALIBRATION DATA (continued)
AMPLITUDE CONTROL LINEARITY Procedure AMDATA #841213 File # 1 2 3 4 System Signal gain amp % %. % %
SET 80% 85.16 0 0 0
-6 db 32-48% 42.97 0 0 0
-12 db 16-24% 23.44 0 0 0 SET 40% 42.97 0 0 0
+6 db 64-96% 85.94 0 0 0 SET 20% 23.44 0 0 0 i +12 db 64-96% 85.94 0 0 0 i
DEPTH CALIBRATION Depth of reflector D1 0.50 inches D2 1.00 inches Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-17 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 l
' }.
DISTANCE AMPLITUDE CORRICTION 1 DELAY in clock periods from A-scan delay AMP is unsigned binary, 0 - 255, 0 = .5v, 128 =.Ov, 255 = .5v Channel 1 2 3 4 DELAY AMP DELAY AMP DELAY AMP DELAY AMP
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 'O
.-J,__ 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 p -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 ,Q_ -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
-1 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0 DAC clock rate 5' MHz l DAC lag 2.5 usec i
i REMARKS SCAN #8 ON 3 0' CLOCK + SIDE W/180 SKEW X:12.00" BY 0.25" Y: 5.00" BY 0.10" GAIN: 56dB 1
I .
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-18 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 1
. .. e OU WELD PROFILE
.'(-) - (+).
~ Weld type: EIEE' >----FLOW---> PIPE LWeld joint: Circumferential.
Weld configuration profile 1 -(Type 0,1,2,3 and 4)
Up (-) Dn (+)
Material' thick-(in.). 3.375__ 3.375 Center line,(in.)- 0.00 ,
Crown width (in.)'. 0.0 Crown height-(in.). 0.0 X ' Taper (Y/N)?. E '(if yes then proceed as follows)
Taper length-(in.)- .
0.00 Taper height (in./+/-)' 0,00 Taper "0" reference C/L (C/L, UP, DOWN edge of weld)
( . If C/L then proceed as follows )
Taper- Start (in.) Stop (in.)
0.00 [Up(-)]_ 0.00 _ (Down(+)]
.c.
l 1
l l
l a
l i
-l
.l j
l J
Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page E-19 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 )
i
i I
i 1
Appendix F TRANSDUCER CERTIFICATION l I
I I
l 1
l Rev. 2, 5/4/87 Page F-1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 i
--. - ~ ; , ; -q q :
(
9 1
** Harlsonlc Labs, Inc. '
Transducer Performance Documentation Pulse Echo . Evaluation bmpcny Ntme AnfDA77) DS Cc-Mc Mrchece Order / 7 P/9 Ur Order 9 4.CS 2
> art Number, gi.&_- e 17 2 - r lerial No. C M 3S brchase Spec. /// ~E MANUFACTURING SPECIFICATIONS n t B I '-
sass llement Dimensions f.3*7C In.
e, :
mw w x -m.
's ! ,J i beinal Frequency /, O tHz ;
J.[4 lN' Ii f
Type I ocusType ff.2r1nch #/d l ;
i !
kning - -
~'M h '
. , . . . : . . . t.ig . . . . . . .
TEST SETUP FOR RETURN PULSE i
..:. #12 ,
4 .
brgst .7 lue ' k dd e n d
. . .I '
bter Path -
usec [. ,
y
"".gf'g _ . . . .
bter Path - in. .
,. .. 1 astrument Termination 8 Ohms hergy Level /
hvr Attn _f F dB _ _ . , _ . _ . _ - . . _ _ _ . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . . .
bin 4a dB Jigh Pass Filter 0 u7- MHz OSCILLOSCOPE t,
'ime Base .P. o usec./dlv.
7ertical M./ Volts /div. jl FREQUENCY ANALYZER requency 8. 2 MHz / div. l;
.inser Display ~
RESULTS FOR PULSE ECHO REAL TINE EVALUATION Dieplayed Above 6,5'2 Vpp Logged Transmit Pulse 2 le Vpp biculated e T/R 0.f 2 Vpp Return from Flat Plate o,r2 Vpp Loop Sain -5~2. f2 dB
>ow Freq. 8 -3dB O' 7I MHz High Freq. 6 -3dB /.2oNHz Cntr Freq. 8 -3dB d Y ~7 mz
>ow Freq. e -6dB #. 5 2 IHz High Freq. e -6dB /. U IHz Cntr Freq. 9 -6dB d. 9 Z IHz I Dak Frsq. O. ff MHz kacumented by- . E
Date 7 [7 Decked by /hd M' Date }/M,/.f7 Equipment Panametrics 5052UA Ultrasonic Analyzer, Tektronix 7704A Mainframe D7704 Display Unit, A7704 Acquisition Unit, 7A18A Dual Trace Amp 7L12 Spsctrum Analyzer, 7B53A Dual Time Base, 6Ft. RG-58A/U Cable Page F-2
.. . .~.~-: . u p. : .. . .. ,.,....nm., .__
M J.r
[.
- * * *
Harlsonlc Labs, Inc.
Transducer Performance Documentation Pulse Echo Evaluation Lny Name AnfDAT~/l Ah"f~c-Mc chase Order /~7F/9 Order # _
(#9 '2-t Number, d,fi._- a l 7 2 - C ial No. C 3 ~7 3f
chase Spec. ///~Z~
MANUFACTURING SPECIFICATIONS l' 20 Style A8 ,
[t" [ / IDF LJr j-jode ' '
ement Dimensions f.3~7s" In. , i i
] inal Frequency usg.f,25' Inch F/ 4
/O HHz Type
, ij,]1-l*
q ning Type - .
e . . ... ,....,,,,j....... 1 I l l ' ' l 'l TEST SETUP FOR RETURN PULSE ! ; ' if - -- , -,-.y. .,
rget .? " lod I e. bU Yb 'l f-
.Y ter Path -
usec ,,dg,g, (., gQ]. { .
ter Path - in. g g PULSER / RECEIVER notrumentTerminationJIQOhms nergy Level /
vr Attn ff dB - - - - - _ - . -
sin 4n dB igh Pass Filter our NHz ,
OSCILLOSCOPE ime Base .7. 0 usec./div.
ertical M./ Volts /div.
FREQUENCY ANAt.YZER requency 6. 2 MHz / div. , ,
inear Display ,
l
'RESULTS FOR PULSE ECHO REAL TIME EVALUATION implayed Above d. TZ Vpp Logged Transmit Pulse ffo Vpp
1culated e T/R o f2 Vpp Return from Flat Plate o. O vpp Loop Ga!.n -f2. S'2 dB ow Freq. e -3dB d. *75~ NHz High Freq. e -3dB /. d~ tHz Cnte Freq. e -3dB O. f 5'~ fHz ow Freq. 8 -6dB O. 5~o tHz High Freq. 8 -6dB /. To tHz Cnte Freq. e -6dB o. F f fez ock Freq. o. fo NHz umented by . . E
Date */ 2 ked by V/ h,- Date
,T /J v /.C Equipment Panametrics 50520A Ultrasonic Analyzer, Tektronix 7704A Mainframe D7704 Display Unit, A7704 Acquisition Unit, 7n.iM Dual Trace Amp 7L12 Spectrum Analyzer, 7B53A Dual Time Base, 6Ft. RG-56A/U Cable Page F-3
.2 . _ . _ . . . _ . . _ . ,
moc93z~ g>Zmhmm3 AH
.mmRgcx > c>qAn .
z>Imcz i wamc ( w* <mmQm ~$o '6W1Ew$ 3-7r F N omOponcmm- - 6 oh. }
x-@mE om g8 6T%lmg Ol wcgxy8z yo g!Rguz>r 9 m? I,!
'ii gmrm' omESm9 r>* %8RG H<T cgi c '
. m 'z{nm0i{59 h i l li l; !lil I i
, : l ,
5 mmc
)
r zc(- Y.-
- g 3 j
.' , E ymhm]ox 2>e-F az wro,,
. - n>CwD
. E -
. G A
M pN l_ yo 33 E
F.
H m- O% rmo Iorm h
~
r
]
fn} e 4
2Mgmm. ^
3 s o <- nb~ g 33 0 mrb CO D o3mO x r"
=
) -
M m a U
- *r"T R hg I
T
- T 3o i - C
, s E LI L - P O u>he>b
-l S
- c Y e
- C N J
.E l'
- U _
Q l
- E
. R
- - F I i
-,L 0
8 o m xd 0
7 il I
= _
0 .
7 nm $ m m = 0cm_m 5 .
_ ,poj 1_c _
1
. aDz y a= w"co t gwP'(t A 1i f S. -+j!! ii J i C .!:i; l i l'
@aW: si*aE* g g@a g _
mImDhzn< mmRHICx opwp. g E m {-
l ) '
g8 mi [ -
,i!,
g'M-n a
TRANSDUCER: RTD
-. fr- //f,////
ys 2/ Ard A Jf)-
r"E .So CABLE : fir. Hisx. so n.. ,
ULTRASONIC EQUIPMENT TYPE : use_1L NR.
MANUFAC T.:_xtutkrimt_
._.K__
PUL S E : ___2__ R E 5. : _.L__
AMPL. . _J#xd dB FREQ. ._g s. 4 s__ MHz CALIBRATION BLOCK:.2227/p,,_ H SING Di l _
MAT: _dae4 REFERENCE BLOCK :47.432-1
]Th M AT:
VL "';-._S
_.__._4 sed yse m/s CONTACT SURFACE:
gg x .ps . ( l x w) k% 1 2_
d a t[
CONNECTOR:
VSH m; 3 ,cA v m/s A f f___ p , ,,
- 4gL epSH 44 / INDEX:/r AT R:#4 , - D = @__J_
-. 100 % SH .
r 80 m
1-h '-
m 60 i
k b
l, -
40 I m - - 'f* -
~
20 SOUND PATH __T._.0 t o.f m. o ,, f.. o .",im,, ""f". .. . .!" o l," , f ,, " ""I",. o , tom ,,"I,", ont,,10 ni 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l
_ mm LONG.
0 ifif if it' vf rf DEPTH -d- ' ir'.rg ' ye ' szt ' vgr " sge mm
~
co s
0 n'j .g e 1
l 'j COSgL: 5+'h D
.x L
j z +'3 l~
l R6ntgen Technloche iMenst by FOCU S-DI AGRAM AMPLITUDE = f ( SOUND PATH-DEPTH-ANGLE) YI
__ i , Pace F-5 , o
l TEST SET-UP IAARS- : RTB m -u' R .za o_ mm.
RUCitL a.5~ - //J Me t . : Ad * ~e r'r s t /. L /
en' 2/Jos 19) y ,, ,
p( Eddy Suic Sensor (ESS) fi/# " >~~ }B
'.N' TRANSDUCER DATA:
y.T. FLAW MTECTOR. Housing:
Make : Krautkramer; Type:USIP 11; RTD Nr. _d a x f/x .ff ( L xWx H )
Conn.: .
T,un og T.D. Type : E Man.O men. t Pulse Str.: _1_. Res.: 1. Pulse sche sensitivity: 1P : 2.y mm en R . //4 awn
, Gain _0_ + ./l dB Freq. 41 - 2.f MHz W D.: 1.2 mm (
48. 1 ~ l Il I
j l Crystal : OTER {
f l 48-3d8: .gVI'
" i
.i I!1 i I ,
/ l 1
ll il i ,
l l I
{ h , !
" k I , i
' l I( 'i g ftj ' ~/ '
}~T~ it l i l
I j i i . I i - l
}l!i
i. l ! '
i N I i i I l ! !! j' } ! i ! i 1 j , 'i,
,t +40 - l; , j , , j i'
i . ( l lI i t > - i , il l l l l 1 i i! M- .- -t i 6, l .
; f 'i 1 i! ,
l e P
" i I g i2e T.
I - I lg
),
l lI , I, e ,j l 1 ' l
,; l iI i ,
l I '
! i , ! i i .l '! i ; 4 ' ;i i Ii , V!. I I;;.
t i ! . s._ I W l
'E M i- ,i j . ljl 'l'i i ! 7 w i ! vi o i, ; jj 1
j i j o
*0 - I - ! I le 29 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Angle of refraction 8 (..'L * . Calibration point Rinteen Technische Dienst b.v.
1 1-2 ?y ULTRASONIC BEAM PLOT I Page F-6 l , o o //#J#g l 0 C2 0 m m o 07 '. #M
J18T SET-UP 3- : RTS R es - /s.7 so' R . /_da_._ mm. A5" 7A'l / Ad
~ i bt . :4?Edd ac' A,l2 0 X 3 +' )
D /_- Eddy Sonic Sensor (ESS) # # H ' A 'S o V : #ff4 */s p 8' "'
TRANSD EER DATA: U.T. FLAW DETECTOR. Hous%: hke : Kreutkrimer; Type: USIP II: RTD Nr. d (I x E#x .f.E ( L xWx H ) Conn.: /Im - ee . Tuning T.O. Type : E E n. O m ch. j Pulse Str.:_3._ Res.: _1_ Pulse echo sensitivity : 1 P : /Imm en R./t4 mm Freq. : 4,.S .g.S MHz , Gain __d + _d dB WD.: JZ num dB,1-j i i i' i
. i l Crystal : ETOR i >
i j!
! ; /E-3d8 . M i j lt iI il - i l
l I I A , I i
..no , ! ! !l \
ll ! l! 3 70 - l l j
^
j l l:
, i i
I i-
'I ' i l l I l ! l 60 - :
g If-} '}k
! ' l l *T j) i I *i j i ~ ~~' f*
{ gU..W i , 4 I ! l!
~ ! f l ,!! , j j ! i ! ! . i
{
; l j ! t "4o, ____,_ .
J I
,i 1
I I ll \. l i ! .
)
l
l : i
\{i !!! l I Tj ' i! , Tl ! J ! j ! !
b $ a.. l l l
.! :i!' . i t i! ,;,(!
i , j 'l l i
!:' 77'f& l ll !!! h t j i, ;l l j W l!
I i
'l l;!,l t j lT y! c ) ,
a. c" "I! -
1 i i
. l ! ll i. l j !I i
1 18 M 38 40 50 60 70 80 M i Angle of refraction 8 (.?) . . Calibration point l Rintyn Technische Dienst b.v. ! l l
!* * % ULTRASONIC BEAM 't0T t Page F-7 0 D //t>Jgj" l MI ASURfD BY . j l
2 E 5
.i ..q ; . ;i p -i. 4 P ?
Appendix G AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC INSPECTION PROCEDURE 1 FOM STATICALLY AND CENTRIFUGALLY CAST
.i . STAINLESS STEEL' PIPING AND PIPING COMPONENTS
e.
i
.I 1
i
-i I , j l
I i o I-j l.. ! Rev. 2, . 5/4/87 Page G-1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252
, -l i
l. l
l[ ' , l,I'M AMDATA ENG'INEERING SPECIFICATION 'NO.-861224.
+ . .m y
4 I
\ ,
4
-9 3 ,
1, : b'l'f '_ , AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC
-INSPECTIO
N. PROCEDURE
FOR STATICALLY-AND CENTRIFUGALLY CAST , l. .. ' STAINLESS: STEEL PIPING AND PIPING COMPONENTS '- l' Amdata, Inc. 7 San Jose, California t I Prepared)by
/ %h / .
Date S/J//87 m l Approved by. kdso Mi M YSI,! F Date 3,!3/,,!fr 7
. Approved by b. w k k, b Date 3 3/!h _
N l o
,t , 7.,. ,i 'ev..3,=3/24/87 R
Page G-2 t
- - - - . _ . ._______.__._.___L________
-LAMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 861224-J' t
TABLE OF CONTENTS o t Section Page: l l'
1. 0 - SCOPE- 1' t i-2 . 0 .' ~ REFERENCES 2
' 3. 0 ~ PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE' 2. .4.0 PERSONNEL' CERTIFICATION AND RECORDS 2 '5.0 EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS 3 6.0 EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS 5 7.0 CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS - 7 8.0 EXAMINATION SYSTEM CALIBRATION 9.
9.0' EXAMINATION PROCEDURES 11 10.0 . DATA ANALYSIS 12 13
~
11'.0 . RECORDING OF INDICATIONS-12.0 EXAMINATION RECORDS ' 14 i i 1 - l.. I i
'Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page G-3 1
~
AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 861224 i AUTOMATED ULTRASONIC f INSPECTION PROCEDURE FOR STATICALLY AND CENTRIFUGALLY CAST ' STAINLESS STEEL PIPING AND PIPING COMPONENTS l.0' SCOPE 1.1 GENERAL 1.1.1 This document covers the requirements for automated ultrasonic examination of butt welds and base metal in statically cast stainless steel (SCSS) and centrifugally cast stainless steel (CCSS) components and piping systems. 1.2 AREA OF EXAMINATION 1.2.1 This procedure is applicable to piping systems , with diameters of four (4) inches or larger. 1.2.2 The examination shall be performed from the OD. l 1.2.3 The examination shall include any suspect area such as the weld and heat af fected zone on either side of a weld or the bulk wall region of components. 1.3 TYPE OF EXAMINATION 1.3.1 Volumetric examination shall be performed using ultrasonic pulse-echo or pitch-catch contact techniques. 1.3.2 The examination will be performed using remote ' scanning / positioning devices and contact or booted search units. 1.4 MATERIALS 1.4.1 As applicable. I l l Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 1 of 14
)
Page G-4 l
AMDATA ENGINEERING' SPECIFICATION NO. 861224
2.0 REFERENCES
2.1 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 2.1.1 ASME~ Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,.Section'XI c 1980' Edition to and in'luding the 1981 Winter o Addenda. 2.1.2 Certification program for Nondestructive Exami-nation Personnel, QAI 2.4 (latest revision). 2.1.3 ASNT Recommended Practice, SNT-TC-1A, (1984 Edition). 2.1.4 Amdata engineering specification No. 841213, IntraSpect/98 Automatic Pipe Scanning System Operating Manual. 2.2 ' APPLICABLE DRAWINGS 2.2.1 The appropriate design or as-built drawings for l each weld forms a part of this procedure. l j I I 3.0 PROCEDURE COMPLIANCE 3.1 The examination described in this document complies with Section XI of the.ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code except where examination coverage is_ limited by part geometry or access. .Where part geometry or access result in limited coverage, such limitations shall be identified and described on the data sheet and final report. I 4.0 PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION AND RECORDS l 4.1 All examiners performing or analyzing data from i ultrasonic examinations in accordance with this i procedure shall be qualified and certified in l accordance with Amdata's Quality Assurance Instruction i f QAI 2.4 " Certification Program for Nondestructive Examination Personnel." t 4.1.1 The ultrasonic examination shall be performed l only by a certified Level II or Level III in Ultrasonic Examination as per Paragraph 2.1.2. 4.1.2 At the option of the examiner, the scanning l subsystem, AMAPS scanner and track setup may be j donc by trained personnel f amiliar with the i scanner and/or qualified as a Level I with i L documented training in the operation of the subsystem under the direct supervision of a qualified Level II or Level III. [ Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 2 of 14 i i Page G-5 ! 1.
,----..n ,n.--- .-- ,, . . - - - - - - - - --- -- - - - - - . . - - -- - - - - - - . - .- ,-, e
' AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIh'ICATIONNO. 861224 4.2 ' PERSONNEL. RECORDS- f i
4.2.1' Records of' personnel' qualifications'shall be > maintained.by the Examination Contractor. 4.2.2 A copy of' the ex'aminer's certification summary and a current eye test as required by-reference document 2.1.2, shall be filed with each perma-nent examination record with a copy submitted to ! the Plant Owner or his Agent, prior to perf orm-ing examinations. - i i! 5.0 EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS ; l 5.1 EXAMINATION FREQUENCY 5.1.1 The nominal examination frequency of. the primary search unit shall be 0.5 to 2.25 MHz .for all angle beam examinations. t-5.1.2 The~ instrument frequency control shall be set to match the rated transducer frequency as close as possible. , 5.1.3- Other pulse frequencies and successfully used . search units listed in Table 1 may be used to i supplement the primary search unit for the . inspection of SCSS and CCSS. This information 1 l shall be recorded on the data sheet, as appropriate, t I i Table 1 - TRANSDUCER SELECTION i i Angle Frequency Element Size (L-wave, degrees) (MHz) (Inches) Type l \ 40 0.5 to 5.0 0.5 to 1.5 Pulse-echo 1 } 40 0.5 to 5.0 0.5 to 1.5 Dual )
~45 0.5 TO 5.0 0.5 to 1.5 Dual l
Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 3 of 14 Pace G-6 ___--_--_________-___-____a
AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 861224 5.2 EXAMINATION ANGLES AND COVERAGE i 5.2.1 The intent of this procedure is to provide 100% ; examination coverage. Each area shall, therefore, be scanned with a minimum 10% overlap of the i transducer beam width (diameter) for each scan pass. 5.2.2 The inspection scan velocity shall not exceed three inches per second. 5.2.3 In the case of interfering conditions due to
. . weld crown or other variables, penetration to ,
a weld root shall be ensured by one or more of ; ! the following: j 5.2.3.1 Increasing 45 degree beam angle. 5.2.3 2 Eliminating interfering conditions by surfacing or other means (by the Utility). 5.3 COUPLANT 5.3.1 Couplants other than deionized water shall be certified for sulfur content and total halogens in accordance with ASTM-D-129-64 and D-808-63. The residual amount of sulfur or total halogens shall not exceed one percent by weight. . 5.4 SURFACE PREPARATION 5.4.1 All examination surf aces shall be clean and free of dirt, weld spatter, etc., or any other condi-tion which would interfere with the examination , by impairing proper transmission of sound beam, i or by pre centing free movement of the search unit alon* the examination surface. 5.5 SCAN COVERAGE AND LIMITATIONS t 5.5.1 Where the surface or other conditions do not , , permit a meaningful examination of the scan area, the examiner shall record the location and , l the particular interfering condition in the , space provided on the scan data sheet and report same to the examination supervisor for correc-tive action or disposition. ( 5.5.2 The total volume within the region of interest f shall be scanned. Scans using several skew ! angles sufficient to detect circumferential and longitudinal (axial) reflectors. Skew angles of approximately 00, 900, 1800, and 2700 will be used insofar as possible. Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 4 of 14 Page G-7
AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 861224 5.6 DATUM POINTS 5.6.1 The ' datum points shall be the RT markings i applied-for construction purposes. In the- i absence of these markings the examiner shall mark the' components at the top dead center (TDC) or towards the RPV, with a datum V, pointed in
# the direction of the exam.
6.0 EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS I
'6.1 EXAMINATION CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT 6.1.1 The-IntraSpect/98 Data-Acquisition and Imaging System (as shown in Figure 1) or its equivalent .
shall be provided.by the Examination Contractor. l for examination as specified in this procedure. , This system includes: j 6.1.1.1 Computer Data Acquisition System (CDAS). l 6.1.1.2 . Remote Data Acquisition System (RDAS). l 6.1.1.3 Scan Controller. i 6.1.1. 4 - Mechanical Scanner.
-6.1.1.5 Remote Pulser-Preamplifier (RPP).
I i 6.1.1.6 Uninterruptable Power Supply (Optional). 6.1.2 Search units: As listed in Table 1. l, 1 1 6 .1. 3 ; Other ultrasonic equipment as required.
]
6.2- PLANT OWNER'S EQUIPMENT The Plant Owner, or his Agent, shall provide the following services and equipment as required: ] 6.2 1 Scaffolding. 6.2.2 Water, air and electricity. , t 6.2.3 Temporary lighting. 6.2.4 Crane support. 6.2.5 Radiation monitoring equipment. L 6.2.6 Radiation shielding. i g , 6.2.7 Anti-contamination clothing. ) 6.2.8 Personnel decontamination facilities. [ 6.2.9 Post-examination cleanup of test area. I
,. Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 5 of 14 Page G-8 I~ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _
l
. 'AMDATA'ENGINEERkNGSPECIFICATION NO. 861224. . .; . i Decontam'ination of ' th'e t'est equipment to
6. 2 '.10.
~
levels.of'10K DPM or-less. .i 6.2.11- Plant conditions.necessary to perform the ~l examination'. ' 6c.1.12 Weld' design drawings, weld history records, radiographs, previous inspection records,.etc. ; 6.2.33 iClosed circuit television equipment, if needed. j. i i l l i-t
~l .j- -l l
i i
' l, - : ..t. >
I l l- i l i l i l i i 1 i l i k o < I I i l } l j Rev'. 3, 3/24/87 Page 6 of 14 j j 1 Pace G-9
\l. ll! !l1{1J goU" M [M$z $ sMheo E
2sU
= . " % " .
C 5 6
$ lj LT R
O A 6 K SEE DPAIV REA ET N R )L X R I RTN E 3 E V A
~ hh SNO -
O 4 8 EI C DTR I AI SN R 9 h LD N 9 7 R A &D AI T LRP O MP - P H ~ .b E ll I H P( C oA p _ pW G T N a _
'T R N
O E _ R 2 L S A o D ga R 3 u g a
- mC0 h/ P P
R I E 5C T 0N U9Y P JS 7 3 0 9 2 JS R B A T Y m a r g ZP OO 91 L Jf 0
] AU a O C PR i c A OR D p g T TE 5 p y A T k g D I K N c C
8D R T I I N o R E Vg I E9 C CO 2 N N A C S g~ g y Kh C I T S 2 NL AO E L f S Y O J U l 8 B Y 32 CR C 9 M C3 3 O S ST O t 2
/
R 9O 1 J R N ;
i s'*P t a O l i
PI t e I c C o s R e p m d e M S e a S T p p i e q u S s L L t A s A a S I Nl I N r E i 11 t L q B WP R H R E T n I n D C C T ^A ' n, A E A A F t, H 1 0 CA t s 5 l o 2l i r e p r B 3 V u 1t d g U e x e
} '* i F
lp #' i S lt u 4n K C E N *"s C EM R I O H N g oO T S P n Y p S S F Y O J D A E O'A - 0 H N QQ* 0 4O 8 9 R 0 E 3 n o 0 M TN I 2 0t O-5 2N t 2 2 2 9J J J 9 9 3 2 9 J 0XOR R DC LN EA i.1 S N O N E AT LS PY
#i '#m a
n i US E I - 0 O 1C OS T TO a ER P r CU M P O NI C G x TEM RD N 'E' 0 SA F S RU El T P1 ' 1 LE F N D r EWOt ' t RA
EUR qnNEMU t
R - RPP T
" i C
A SR S*
KEP E"
( E' ga - $? ", "Ds)w vo$ y g r t$* 90
'AMDAT5 ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION. NO. 861224 7.0'^ CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS 7.1 CALIBRATION DATA PACKAGES j l
Calibration'DataLPackages shall be numbered 861224-1, , 861224-2, etc., and shall be signed by the examiner (s) i ! upon completion, noting applicable SNf-TC-1A certifica- l , tion levels.. i 1 7.2 LASIC CALIBRATION BLOCK ' 1 I 7.2.1 The basic calibration block should be manufac-
.tured in' accordance with the applicable edition and addenda of Section-XI of the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. Variations from Section XI requirements shall be identified on the data :
sheets. 7.2.2 Where practical, the basic calibration block i should be made from material of the same nominal diameter and nominal wall thickness or pipe schedule as the pipe to be examined. 7.2.3 Calibration reflectors shall be in accordance with- 7.2.1 above. 7.2.4 The temperature of the basic calibration block shall be within 25 degrees . Fahrenheit of the temperature of.the component. Basic calibra-tion block ' and component temperatures shall be recorded on the Calibration Data Sheet. 7.3 CALIBRATION AND VERIFICATION DESCRIPTIONS 7 . 3 .1 - Reference Sensitivity Level 7.3.1.1 The. reference sensitivity level shall.be established using the distance-amplitude curve or ID notch initially obtained directly from the basic calibration block. 7.3.1.2 Indications (nongeometric) shall be evaluated at the scanning reference sensitivity level. l L
'Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 8 of 14 Pace G-11
1 AMDATA ENGINEER *ING SPECIFICATION NO. 661224 1 7.3.2 Calibration Verification (Checks) l 7.3.2.1 The instrument vertical and amplitude control linearity shall be checked in accordance with the techniques described - l in thedure referenced in Paragraph ]' 2.1.4. f 7.3.2.2 This will be done either using an angle i beam or straight beam search unit on the basic calibration block.
)
7.4 TIMES OF CALIBRATION AND CALIBRATION CHECKS f 7 . 4 .1 - Examination system calibration shall be performed prior to examination. i.4.2 Instrument linearity checks shall be performed prior to the start and at the completion of examinations.
,4 . 3 Calibration checks shall be performed every 12 hours or when any part of the examination system is changed. These checks need only be performed on the examination equipment used over this time period.
7.4.4 A calibration check shall also be performed at the completion of all examination. 7.4.5 Any change in search units, shoes, couplants, cables, ultrasonic instruments, recording devices, or any other parts of the examination system shall be cause for calibration check. The original calibration shall be performed on the basic calibration block. Calibration checks may be performed on either a basic calibration block simulator or the basic calibration block, but must include a check of the entire examination system. 7.5 CALIBRATION RESPONSE TOLERANCES 7.5.1 For the instrument linearity checks, the toler-ances specified in Reference 2.1.4 shall apply. 7.5.2 Signal response obtained during calibration che c ks shall be within plus or minus 20% (plus or minus 2dB) of that established during initial system calibration. 7.5.3 If any. point of the response level has decreased by more than 20% (2dB) of its amplitude, the examiner shall: Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 9 of 14 Page G-12
2 AMDATA~ ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 6b1244- l i
'l I
7'.5.3 1 Void all scans completed since l previous valid calibration or 'i l calibration check, j' . I 7.5.3.2 Recalibrates' examination system. -] 7.5.3.3 Re-examine voided scan areas from above. 7 '. 5 . 4 If any point of the. response ~1evel has i increased by more than 20% (2dB) of its l.Jl amplitude, the examiner shall: { lj 7.5.4.1 Recalibrates examination system. 7.5.4.2 Re-examine areas with recordable i indications. ; 7.5.4.3 Note-changes of signal response amplitudes from the recorded indications on the data sheet. 7.6 SEARCH UNIT CALIBRATION 7.6.1 Prior to performing system calibration, the search unit beam exit point and beam angle shall be determined. This shall be verified using an appropriate reference. block. ) 8.0 SYSTEM CALIBRATION PROCEDURE 8.1 SYSTEM CALIBRATION 8.1.1 Calibration shall include the complete ultrasonic examination system. If . not already operating, the equipment shall 'l 8.1.2
' be allowed a minimum of 15 minutes warm-up time.
8.1.3 Set up the mechanical scanning equipment. 8.1.4 Set up the UT subsystem to appropriate settings as required for specific calibrations. i 8.1.5 Display - form and adjust the parameters as per calibration. Adjustments and additional information may be added in the remarks page H of the form. Numerical values are not applicable and are revised for each examination. Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 10 of 14 > Page G-13
AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 861224 9 8.1.6 Using the basic calibration block per para-graph 7.2, scan the block with the AMAPS scanner collecting data on the computer data- - acquisition system for each transducer.- If ' required, rescan the calibration block until satisfactory results are obtained. 8.1.7 The DAC curve, if applicable, shall be recorded on the appropriate calibration record. 8.2 PROCEDURE FOR REFERENCE LEVEL SETUP i i 8.2.1 The maximum calibration indications shall be l obtained with the sound beam oriented ' essentially perpendicular to the axis of the calibration reflector. The center line of the I search unit shall be at least 3/4 inch (19mm) from the nearest side of the block or pipe. 8.2.2 Reflectors in the appropriate basic calibration block described in 7.2 shall be used for angle beam calibration. 8.2.3 One-Half Vee Path Examination (40 degrees L-wave). 8.2.3.1 If a DAC is used, the 1/2 T, 3/4 T and 1-1/4 T side-drilled holes shall be used to cons ruct a DAC curve. The highest amplitude shall be set at 80% FSH. This is the primary reference level. 8.2.3.2 If a DAC is used, for material less than 1" thick, the 1/2 T and 1-1/2. T side-drilled holes shall be used to construct the DAC curve. 8.2.3.3 The data for the reference level shall be recorded. , 8.3 PROCEDURE FOR SYSTEM LINEARITY CHECK Use the Amdata procedure per paragraph 2.1.4. l l 8.4 SYSTEM CALIBRATION CHECK (verification) I l 8.4.1 Verification of calibration required by ! paragraph 7.4 shall be performed on the basic j
, calibration block.
L 8.4.1.1 Refer to the proper Calibration Data Sheets for required instrument settings. , Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 11 of 14 Pace G-14
NO. 001449 AMDATALENGINEERING1 SPECIFICATION 8.4.1.2 Use the previously recorded instrument '
' setting and perform a check of the exam- 3 ination system including sensitivity level. Verify that the' amplitude ,
response is within plus or minus- 20% ' (plus or . minus 2 dB) of the response 'l-obtained during initial calibration. 8.4.1.3 Reposition search. unit on the basic Calibration block and observe maximum signal response amplitudes. Check the reflector signals against the' previous: ' signals of at least two reflectors which f all over 75% of the volume. for each channel to be verified. 8.4.1.4 Verify that all amplitudes f all within 20% (plus or minus 2dB) of the equalized response level. 8.4.1.5 If the response from any reflector is beyond the allowed tolerance, refer to Section 7.5. 9.0 EXAMINATION PROCEDURE 9.1 Verify. system operations on Amdata I/98 Test Block (refer ta) the standard I/98 procedure in the IntraSpect/98 Operating Manual, PN 841213). 9.2 . Place scanner on track, verify mobility and position scanner to reference location. 9,3 The qualified data collector or Level I, under the supervision of the qualified data collector, shall take The following tech-and record thickness profiles. niquesL may be used: Use a O degree L-wave trar.sducer. Recommended 9.3.1 0.375" to 0.5" diameter, either single or dual element, having a frequency between 0.5 Mhz to 5.0 Mhz. The thickness and metallurgical f actors will dictate the appropriate trans-ducer selection. Other frequencies and sizes may be used to obtain satisfactory results. Hand position the transducer at various loca-tions to obtain reading. 9.3.2 (Optional step) Alternatively, an automatic scan of the region may be performed using a 0 0 transducer. 9.3.3 Record thickness profiles on the appropriate data sheets. i. Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 12 of 14 Page G-15
i AMDATA ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION NO. 861224 9.4 SETUP OF INTRASI MCT DATA-ACQUISITION SYSTEM 9.4.1 Display form and adjust parameters as per Amdata IntraSpect/98 Operating Manual Number 841213. 9.4.2 Check alignment of track with track locator, J check datum location and skew. 9.4.3 Apply couplant to the area of interest using , one of the following methods. 9.4.3.1 Manual application. 9.4.3.2 Automatic feed (pump).
)
l 9.5 CHECK SOFTWARE SETUP FOR REQUIRED CHANNELS. Examples are listed below: 9.5.1 Gain setting should be adjusted to give optimum peak signal to noise ratio. 9.5.2 Delay gates. 9.5.3 X and Y coordinates and scan pattern. . I 9.5.4. Skew angles. , l 9.6 CONTINUE SCANNING SEQUENCES , I l i Continue scanning sequences until all scan areas requiring the'same calibration have been examined. Examinations shall not be considered complete until all l recordable indications have been evaluated. I 10.0 DATA ANALYSIS 10.1 Display C-scan presentation. 10.2 Select B-scan for analysis with cursor. 10.3 Analyze the B-scan presentation for flaws. 10.4 All indications shall be investigated to the extent l that the examiner can determine the shape, identity and l location of the discontinuity. l 10.5 Additional features may be used to analyze collected data, e.g., zoom movie of B-scan, primary cube display, photograph of graphics. I Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Pege 13 of 14 Page G-16 j i
,AMDATA ENGINEERINGiSPECIFICATION NO.-861224~ '
11.0- ' RECORDING OF INDICATIONS 11.1 HARD COPIES
* .Hard-copy' output of.all indications determined not to ~be. screen noise or OD geometry shall be made. Thesej .hard copies shall. consist of the following: ,. ~
11.1.'l Setup forms. i 11.1.2 C-scan presentations. 11.1.3 ' Selected B and B' scans. f 11.1.4 other data'as appropriate. 12.0 EXAMINATION RECORDS 12.1 ' CERTIFICATION OF RECORDS The1 examiner shall complete and sign the appropriate-ultrasonic calibration data sheet and Indication Report Sheet Supplement A immediately upon the com-pletion of each examination or series of examinations
' noting applicable.NDE certification' levels. .
12.2 FILING OF RECORDS The Examination Contractor shall be responsible for submitting to the Plant Owner, or his Agent, a com-
pletely documented set of examination records includ-ing certification or . personnel . qualifications with a current eye test. report..
I l 4 1
. {,
1 Rev. 3, 3/24/87 Page 14 of 14 Page G-17
1 1 1 l i l ( Appendix H INTRASPECT/98 SYSTEM TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ; l l J
\
a l Rev. 2+,.5/4/87 Page H-1 Trojan Inspection Report, IR252 - f } 1 1
I INTRASPECT/98 SYSTFJi TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION Amdata, Inc. 775 Montague Expressway Milpitas, California 95035 (408) 942-0891 Rev. 5, 11/18/86 IR180
ywy <,
' a
,i
! + % {
Examination Services & Products J\ Ultrasonic Imaging ! M TA Amdata, Inc.
- l Applications:
Pipe Welds
-
Girtn' Welds j i

Overlay Welds
{
* - Arial Welds Foatures:
Structural'ly designed for Field )
Work .
1-8 Channels
~
Color Imaging i
* - n, B, C, - Scan Images 'g.o y'(, - >wrmvmo.nry,mye;ypryy,,ypg7py$ypmerp;q / *' Digitized Display of all data v . ,$ 4 , ;1 y:jhd1MQQ 4
Spatial Averaging ;3f ( -
ld] ,, y g" g b >'
"i " ,i]
a l Cummary: Lg[.. , 5 && , ; ~" ' $ f ' The Intraspect 98 Ultrasonic Im- /s; < a4 . s gj aging System developed over the last five years is the most recent M;? dl ~
;u 'f M, , ,s ip > q;ij p
4 enhancement of the Intraspect 2. Ti. $g;a. A r: -
.j c.:e*. ... ,i mgl6 h .Several new features have helped oN - , h:,yw i ;IQ the Amdata System
maintain its [f 4 position as the state-of-the-art rij ?s ,I s M , ff 7 ~ Q'" 3 choice for usage in weld f %>
inspections.
f. >< % @.w. g$N
j$. I fQi -- 6 l kdh;;% [,' w' .f%Q%.
.. ~
s' M f ?l1 w
.1 Q ,;+Q y ( .w%%f3 ,bo r l l\
3 ra p;W w ~* ....
'c.3_ ;,- .c gy ' ~ '
7
+
s , s
~ ... .s ,
P ,
? = , , */ . /
84 ,1 - a 3 [' h
.; i ! f . ,' -
l4 y c
.f6 - - . t c., _,-
(u+y ~ +' ,ww- ,"+
.w . - .nw - .
I t
Qualified at Ihe EPRI NDE Center.
l
Examination Services & Products
.{'
Advantages of the Intraspect 98 Frywgwrelgpywwwcey l
*m . , m q
77 e 4,
1. System Start Up - Approximately 5 minutes. 9, wn# - l ' _. j) .
we
'.a s ., - 2. Digitized 'A' Scan The signal is digitized and is available in RF '? I,m m l ' Q jg ' I or Video. yp ' y ',' '
3. Multiplex Capability Available in 4 to 8 Channels. A weld in a p Ng 14" pipe can therefore be inspected from 9.u i %
1 ' _bo s four directions in approximately 22 minutes. g: > 7;
4. Signal Processing All signals .in the gated area are digitized. h6.niW
#EOMu%.dui"170ETaWE@Ej AMm.JUA '
5.DAC Computer controlled.
' 6. Hard Copy Option available or via colored photos. i p wmmm '
7. Computer Control Yes, and settings, I UT Instrument : 'rmm;!q;,p?
p , W Q)p"q ^ p p, E'l yl g. QQdi n g gI 6.3 1 m - ggy;p y a
8. Image pre.sentation- 'A', 'B', 'C'. 'A' and 'C' Scan data provide y -
9 real time capability; 'B' scan data is available ,
, [. Qgs , , ggdy ~ *y q,gg 'id .
immediately after scanning. End view 'B' ,
n. .q.;;9 D 4 '~ jf.
I scans may be obtained in October. % , n., ? i 7. .. W e, : 4 h j
9. Disc Storage Hard disc-80 M Byte fj m y" gg g .
i 10.SAFT Data recorded in compatible form. The addi- % i T - "- Eg f tional SAFT analysis capability can be used YEbgiMEwndMliid ' as a first inspection analysis and will be available by October,1985. e wn -,. m , ,
+
n ~, ; p - yu
' 3 % r t? ,
y '
..\
f s s [w' s4 E
, - ~ . -- _ . . .-
s 4 . .. . n,,msw ~.- 1 g.c;; W, h6
h. .-
Fer More Information,
Contact:
p 9 l
\
y .s
, ms_
m. .-. -.-
g. l l Supplier of Advanced Ultrasonic Sys. ems AMDATA, IMC. 576 Charcot Avenue, San Jose, CA 95131 l Phone (408) 435-1090 l }' 1 . _ _ - _ -_.--_-_ _ -- _ --_.-
CONTENTS
' Item Page I. GENERAL 1 l
A. COMPONENTS '1 ! B.- ULTRASONIC TESTING MODES 3 C., POWER 3 D.- ENVIRONMENT 3
'E. SYSTEM WEIGHTS AND MEASURES .3-l II. SYSTEM COMPONENTS- 4 A. HP 9836CS COMPUTER SUBSYSTEM 4 B. REMOTE DATA-ACQUISITION SYSTEM (RDAS) 5 'C. REMOTE PULSER-PREAMPLIFIER 6
D. UNINTERRUPTABLE' POWER SUPPLY (UPS) 7. E. AMAPS MODEL 2090-SCANNER 8 F. AMDATA SC5032 SCAN CONTROLLER 10 III. THEORY OF OPERATION- 12 A.- HARDWARE SETUP 12 B. ' TEST SETUP ~ 13 C.- RUNNING THE TEST 13 D. HARD COPIES 18
, Rev.15, 11/18/86 IR180 t
L m
I i l INTRASPECT/98 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION I. GENERAL } The IntraSpect/98 is a four-channel ultrasonic scanning, data acquisition and imaging system designed to perform automatic examinations at remote distances of up to 250 feet. The system i features complete A-scan recording, which is accomplished by digitizing and storing the complete RF or video A-scan waveforms. 1 The Intraspect/98 system can store up to 55 megabytes of data per scan. A real-time C-scan display (eight-color) is generated during scanning and data acquisition. Eight-color B-scans and isometric views with rotational capability can be created from the acquired data. The stored data can be recalled at any future date for review or further processing. Since the complete A-scan is digitized, rescanning is not necessary. The system is packaged in rugged enclosure / shipping cases. The IntraSpect/98 is designed to be' set up and operated while in-stalled in the shipping cases. Rack-mounting cases or other enclosure types can be supplied on request. A. COMPONENTS The I/98 system is comprised of the following major components. Description Part Number
1. Hewlett-Packard 9836CS computer subsystem 65021

2. RDAS remote data-acquisition subsystem 63170

3. Remote pulser preamplifier (four channels) 63700

4. Remote receiver 63600

5. Umbilical cable 64203

6. Scanner, Model 2090 (interchangeable arm) 35095

7. Scan controller, Model SC5032 65000

8. Uninterruptible power supply 35131

9. Communication set 63005 Figure 1 is a block diagram showing the interconnection of the system components.
I , { h Rov. 5, 11/18/86 1 IR180 l l L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . _ _ _ ___________J
. .I. . .-l m*
8 n
=
l? 3y<
~:.
me .
.6 EOkt se .og 'g l : n K N_
V g l :., __ Igo " "u el oj[ O e a gI . y 5 3
$$ k k kk 0 gW b O O g $a sia' v O O E & E m
o ! w sooO EE e i5 Woea aM .. t O ' !2 S
. g ~ ngs 4 s s.. e " 5 g h EME 9 so a 9 $
I ' B - i s$ E ivE { E q E yc " W W { 5 t ,, o$ 3 fg, y E W W { N_D Ec D
'3 i
U C Ooo Q o O {g ] 4 agg
* , otor m - Q *Q R osoE lg !
w,= y e ; 35 { EWs :
>E Wh_
t l
) Figure 1. ( Interconnection Block Diagram l Rev. 5, 11/18/86 2 IR180 I
-_ - -- )
D. ULTRASONIC TESTING MODES 1.
.2. . 'Shear or longitudinal transmission mode Transducer frequencies of from-0.5'to'10 MHz .3. Beam angle in the material of from 0 to 70 degrees
4. Pulse-echo / single-element or dual-element / pitch-catch. configuration

5. Contact or. booted search. units

6. Through-transmission testing
-C. POWER The system operates on 120 volts AC, 60 Hertz, single phase current. .An uninterruptable power supply is provided along with a data-save feature. This prevents loss of data or.
equipment and prevents' damage in the event of power surges or. interruptions. D. ENVIRONMENT The1 system is designed to operate in the following environment: l
1. Humidit'y of 20 to 90 percent in both the control area and examination area.

2. Ambient temperature of 350 F to 1200 F in th*
examination area.
3. Ambient temperature of 500 F to 1000 ? in the control area.
E. SYSTEM WEIGHTS AND MEASURES The' system is supplied with seven enclosure cases. The identity, weight and size for each are.as follows: Item Weight (1b) Size (in) WxHxD Case'll HP 9836C and Color 170 26.5 x 30 x 31.4-Display i Case #2 Remote Pulser- 200 2 6.5 ~ x 3 0 x 31.4 Preamplifier 55 MB Hard Disk Drive 60 MB Tape Drive Uninterruptable Power ) j Supply' Rev. 5, 11/18/86 3 IR180 bis _uz___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ l
l
;E. SYSTEM: WEIGHTS AND MEASURES (continund) i Item Weight (lb) Size (in) WxHxD Case #31 RDAS 20 MHz A/D 160 26.5 x 30 x 31.4 -
converter i Scan Controller Remote Receiver Case'f4 AMAPS 2090' Scanner 34 15 x 27 x 26 i Test fixture l Case #5 250-foot cable 160 35 x 16 x 25
Case #6 Five 360-degree tracks 79 15 x 27 x 26 8" to'40". pipe sizes selected by the purchaser and an adapter for 4 to 6" 's diameters Case #7- Printer 25 9 x 15.x 21 Other enclosure configurations 'I can be supplied upon request.
Track _ designs to accommodate round, flat, vertical, horizontal and overhead surfaces can be supplied. Track mountings can be designed to satisfy most applications. II. SYSTEM COMPONENTS A. HP 9836CS COMPUTER SUBSYSTEM The HP 9836CS is the master computer for the I/98 system. It is utilized for system control, data storage, and data analysis. It displays color B- and C-scans, isometric P-cubes and any desired A-scan. The user-friendly sof tware permits the operator to communi-cate with the various subsystems through the computer. Initial set up and calibration is accomplished by directly entering the necessary test and scan parameters into elec-tronically generated forms displayed on the color monitor. Once entered, this information controls the entire test and is permanently stored along with the ultrasonic RF data and the position coordinates acquired during the test. The HP 9836CS subsystem uses a 55-megabyte hard disk to temporarily store all the test information. After all scanning' is completed, a 60-megabyte 1/4-inch tape cartridge can be inserted.into the slot located at the top of the hard disk case, and an off-line transfer of all data from the disk to tape can be accomplished. The cassette tapes provide a permanent storage of the inspection data. Rev. 5, 11/18/86 4 IR180 i
The data can be reloaded into the computer at any time for further analysis or more advanced processing. Because the IntraSpect/98 system digitizes and stores the complete A-scan RF trace, the examination can be recreated without ever having to rescan. This feature provides the added capability of acquiring data at the actual test site and reviewing or processing it at a separate location. A real-time, high-resolution C-scan is created on the computer monitor during the test scanning process. Upon completion of the test, the operator can select any area of the C-scan image and generate a B-scan cross sectional view. ; The B-scan display movie feature any desired allows the operator to sequentially set of B-scans. The operator may step through the B-scans one at a time or have the system automatically display the images one after the other. The B- and C-scan images utilize eight distinct colors to indicate signal amplitude at any given point. Each of the 256 discrete amplitude levels is assigned within one of the color bands. The operator assigns the amplitude value for the use of two to eight colors at the operator's discretion. Any color combination from a palette of 256 colors may be selected. A dot-matrix printer is included with this subsystem. An optional laser printer is available that provides gray-toned reproductions of the color images (up to eight shades of gray). The HP 9836CS is the master computer for the IntraSpect/98 system and communicates either directly or indirectly with all of the following subsystems. B. REMOTE DATA-ACQUISITION SYSTEM (RDAS) The Remote Data-Acquisition System (RDAS) has a 20 MHz analog-to-digital (A/D) converter that digitizes the incoming radio-frequency (RF) signals from the transducers. RDAS also provides an intelligent interface between all subsystem components and the HP 9836CS computer. The sampling rate is selectable from 5 to 20 MHz. The digitized data is transferred to the HP 9836CS computer for storage and processing. The RDAS increases the overall speed and performance of the IntraSpect/98 system by allowing the HP 9836CS to concentrate on storing and processing the acquired data. It synchron-izes the A/D conversion of the multiple-channel multiplexed RF data stream with pulse outputs from the Remote Pulser Preamplifier and the location of the scanner. 11 Lev. 5, 11/18/86 5 IR180 1
i I C. REMOTE PULSER-PREAMPLIFIER The Remote Pulser-Preamplifier (RPP)'is a four-channel
^ computer-controlled ultrasonic instrument. It multiplexer !
the-four input channels to one RF_ output and provides a gain 1
-of 80 dB. All parameters are under computer control.- The unit is designed for remote, unattended operation.
1. Pulser Specifications

a. . Pulse Output: A negative rectangular
' pulse output is computer-controlled from 50 to 300 volts into 50' ohms.
b. Pulse Rise Time: This is typically less than 15 ns into 50 ;
ohms. l
c. Number of Channels: Four.

d. Pulse Duration: The computer-controlled pulse width is adjustable from 50 to 500 ns pulse duration,

e. Pulse Damping: The damping is adjustable in increments from 50 to l 500 ohms.

f. Pulse Repetition Rate: The repetition rate per channel is controlled by an external sync pulse.
The maximum capability of the unit is approximately 1 kHz without droop per' channel. 2.- Preamplifier Specification
a. Bandwidth: Flat from 0.4 to 20 MHz within-+/-l dB per 20 dB of gain selected.

b. Noise: White noise levels referred to the input do not exceed 13 nv/ (Hz; at 25 degrees Celcius with a 50-ohm source and j I load.
Rev. 5, 11/18/86 6 IR180 l l 1 , i
2. Proamplifior Specification (continued) c.- Recovery time: Does not exceed 3 ms in pulse-echo configuration with a 200 volt rectangular pulse.

d. Filter: Provides three computer-addressable, sixth-order filters.
The filters plug into the rear panel.
e. Gain: 80 dB maximum. The gain is under computer control with op3rator capability of setting i gain increments in 0.5-dB steps over the range of 0 to 80 do.
I l f. Multiplexer: Provided with four I independent channels. [. Each channel is capable of operating in either a pitch-catch (dual element) or pulse-echo (single element) transmission mode. -The software allows for collection of data from all four channels in either mode or a combination of both modes. D. UNINTERRUPTABLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS) i This subsystem consists of the uninterruptable power supply (UPS) and line filter. In the event the main power is lost, the UPS supplies the InstrSpect/98 for up to 25 minutes. This permits the operator to terminate the operation and save all pertinent data. I The cabsystem operates automatically whenever the line voltage is below 85% of nominal. An audible alarm beeps at eight-second intervals and sounds whenever the inverter is running. Rev. 5, 11/18/86 7 IR180 I L j
Ea -AMAPS MODEL'2090 SCAUNER The AMAPS 'Model 2090 scanner is Amdata's latest remotely controlled' automatic scanner. It is designed for fast installation on a wide range of surface curvatures, and. ultrasonic transducers and other NDT examination' devices can be mounted on it. The Model 2090 has an interchangeable Y-axis (perpendicular to the track) arm assembly that allows maximum scan strokes of from four to twelve inches. An optional skewing unit.is - available that remotely adjusts the skew of the search unit attached to'the-scanner during angle beam UT testing. The 4 Model 2090 will accommodate . booted, contact, or squirter-type search units. Coaxial connections for up to four channels of pulse-echo or pitch-catch UT transducer configur-ations are provided. The scanner is also capable of accommo-
. dating other inspection devices such as eddy current probes.
Motion in the X-axis (horizontal to the track)-is restricted only by the length of the mounting track.
Precision movements and sturdy construction ensure reliable results in laboratory and field environments. The 1/8-inch-thick aluminum frame provides compact packaging and the the ruggedness required of a field-hardened scanner.
I
1. Flexible Mounting Guide Tracks Flexible mild-steel sector and 360-degree scanner guide tracks are available in any length. They adapt to surfaces of various geometries and curvatures. Con-structed from a magnetic material, the scanner wheels couple to the steel track. A nylon belt and ratchet mechanism facilitate installation of tne sector tracks in the desired examination location. 360-degree tracks are secured by worm-gear mechanisms. Flexible Delrin guide rails maintain scanner wheel alignment on the tracks.
Various methods of track mounting can be supplied to satisfy other test requirements.
2. Wheel Assemblies The scanner is driven to the appropriate position by magnetic wheels that provide 80 pounds of total attrac-tive force between the scanner and the specimen being scanned. The magnetic wheels are flame-sprayed--ensuring long life and excellent traction. The magnetic design l permits quick removal and installation.
i Rev. 5, 11/18/86 8 IR180 h
a
3. Encoders
] . Incremental optical encoders are used on both axes to ,
signal _the position of the scanner. The encoders 1 operate independently of the drive train for maximum reliability. 1 l
4. Drive Train i Heavy-duty stepper motors power both axes. The X-axis drive has a precision chain and sprocket drive train j that powers the magnetic wheel assemblies. Drive train backlash does notiexceed 0.010 inch. The drive motors are mounted on the scanner. outer frame to facilitate cooling and increase reliability. All bearing are
, permanently. lubricated. The Y-axis. drive employs a precision lead screw.
5 '. Model 2090 AMAPS Scanner Specifications SCANNER SIZE: 4.8" high'x 7.8 long x 18.5" wide (with 10" arm) SCANNER SPEED: a) X-axis: 2 in/sec maximum Rated at 1 in/sec (with 3.5 lb. load) b) Y-axis: 2 in/sec maximum Rated at 1 in/sec (with 3.5 lb. load) i Note: Holding current can be applied to the stepping motors on both axes to prevent motion. DRIVE TRAIN: a) X-axis: 704 steps per inch b) Y-axis: 305 steps per inch
. POSITION ENCODERS: '
l a) X-axis: Optical, 127 pulses per inch b) Y-axis: Optical, 208 pulses per inch TRACKS: a) Pipe Diameter: 4" minimum, no maximum b) Vessel Diameter: 4" minimum, no maximum c) Flat Plate: Unlimited d) Standard 3600 tracks for diameters from 4" to 40" e) Standard sector tracks from 18" to 72" length f) Installation Time: 5 minutes or less g) Mounting force: 80 lbs. magnetic (more available on request) Rev. 5, 11/18/86 9 IR180
RF CABLE. CONNECTIONS:

o a) A-four' cable harness is provided for four
. pulse-echo or pitch-catch UT channels b)- Microdot female connectors mate to the ,
transducers 1 c) BNC male connectors are mounted to the scanner frame 'l
. OPTIONS:
a)- Interchangeable Y-axis arms of from 4" to 12" lengths b) Level indicator f ' c)- Water couplant pump , d)l Gel couplant pump l e) Skewing Unit with position indicator- (+/-1800), l 250-foot cable and controller F. AMDATA SC5032 SCAN CONTROLLER i The SC5032. Scan Controller is specifically designed to control the AMAPS Model 2090 scanner. The SC5032 Controller operates'in one of two. modes: o Remote ocntrol via.a terminal or external computer. o Remote manual control using the supplied joystick. The controller interfaces are through the joystick connector' and an RS-232 communications port. The unit maintains a l count of ' the encoder output from tha AMAPS scanner and relays that information to an attached terminal or computer.
1. RS-232 Communications Interface The RS-232 interface is used for communication between the RDAS and the controller. The system is designed to accommodate cable lengths of up to 250 feet. The interface operates at 9600 baud.

2. Joystick The controller is compatible with most yousticks designed for1use with personal computers.

3. Trigger, Output The trigger output is used to synchronize the pulser (in the RPP), DAC functions (in the Remote Receiver) and the A/D converter (in the RDAS). In addition, an oscilloscope or other test equipment may use this output.
The trigger pulse is 3 volts, with active pull-up and pull-down through 330 ohms. The positive going pulse o persists for a minimum of 65 microseconds (120 microseconds nominal). I L Rev. 5, 11/18/86 10 IR180
i
4. Scanner Interconnection cablo The scanner interconnection cable interfaces the controller to the stepping motors and the X- and Y-axis encoders. Each of the four phase stepping motors is rated at 33 volts maximum. The outputs from the shaft optical encoders are five volts and are TTL compatible. i

5. Physical Characteristics i
The Scan Controller is 11 inches long, 5 inches high and 5.25 inches wide. The unit utilizes a Tektronix ! TM515* power module operating on 50 to 400 Hertz and 100 to 120 or 200 to 240 volts.
6. Options l The following options are available for the Scan Controller SC5032.
I Remote portable terminal Single-step manual control
]
a G. UMBILICAL CABLE An Umbilical Cable with a length of 250 feet is provided with the system. All of the interconnections between the components in the control and examination areas are contained in the Umbilical Cable. H. COMMUNICATION SET A communicaiton set with an electronic amplifier is provided with the standard IntraSpect/98. There is a communication ' cable in the umbilical cable bundle that is 250 feet long. It provides communications between operators in the control and examination areas. l. Tektronix and TM515 are registered trademarks of Tektronix Corpora t'_on . f Rev. 5, 11/18/86 11 IR180
III.. THEORY OF OPERATION-A. OVERVIEW.
1. Menu Driven' Software The IntraSpect/98 System is designed to be operator friendly.. The software is. menu driven. Total system control is accomplished through the HP 9836CS computer by filling.in'an electronic form. All the set-up
'information.is recorded in the. form and the entire system'is automatically configured under. complete digital control from these values. . There are no knobs to turn. All system parameters (gains, delays, etc.)
are under complete digital control. Any. number of forms may be prepared in. advance and stored for later use.
2. Testing-Modes q The standard IntraSpect/98 supports the following modes of operation:

a. Shear-wave or longitudinal-wave transmission.

b. Transducer frequencies from 0.5 to 10 MHz.

c. Beam angle in the material from 0 to 70 degrees. The B-scan display automatically adjusts to show the true target locations.

d. Pulse-echo or pitch-catch.

e. Contact or booted search units.
B. HARDWARE SETUP
1. Control Console System setup is quickly accomplished by simply removing the front and rear covers from the enclosure cases.
These same cases are used both for shipping and for stacking the cases for convenient computer access'. The accessory and umbilical cables can then be connected. Each cable connection is clearly identified to facilitate proper connection.
2. Umbilical Cable The umbilical cable provides the proper interconnect-tions for all the main subsystems and AMAPS 2090 scanner. It also permits the scanner to be operated remotely within a 250-foot radius of the control console. Within this radius, the operator only needs to reposition the lightweight scanner to each test area.
l Rev. 5, 11/18/86 12 IR180 1 l \ _ _ - _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
3. Scanner Setup The 2090 scanner mounts directly to the flexible steel
. track supplied by Amdata. The track is designed for fast mounting on the test specimen. The scanner then ,
attaches to the track and the drive wheels that have ' been incorporated into the scanner design. Amdata can supply a variety of track designs to accommodate flat, round, or other surface geometries. A variety of track mounting designs can also be provided which permit the scanner to operate unrestricted on horizontal, vertical or over-head surfaces. ( C. TEST SETUP' i
1. Operation Check-out Once AC power is applied to the system, the 9836CS computer automatically runs through a test procedure to i verify correct system operation. Upon completion, a main menu is displayed on the CRT. The operator is directed to choose from the items listed. t

2. Creating a New Test A new test is created by choosing the " Setup" file. .A series of computer generated " setup forms" will then be displayed on the CRT. The operator simply fills in the desired UT instrument scanning and test parameters. ,
Upon completion, the test is ready to be run. It j should be noted that the operator can edit or change 1 any entry prior to running the test. Once the test is { run, no changes can be made without changing the name .j of the test (file). ! l D. RUNNING THE TEST
1. Scan and UT Subsystem Operation The operator commands the HP 9836CS to run the test, initiating a sequence of operations. The UT subsystem and scan control parameters are down loaded to the remote data-acquisition system (RDAS). The RDAS now assumes system control, freeing the HP 9836CS for i acquiring and processing data. '
The RDAS sends the appropriate scan parameters, X and Y indexing and scan speed, which the operator selected during setup, to the scan controller. The scan con-troller commands the AMAPS 2090 scanner to commence the l desired scan pattern. The scan controller continuously l reads the X and Y encoder outputs from the 2090 scanner. l When the scanner reaches the desired position increment, , which the operator specified data to be taken from, the i scan controller sends a sync pulse to the RDAS. Rev. 5, 11/18/86 13 IR180 l i __._.________..___________________Q
The RDAS then commands the Remoto Pulsor Pronmplifier to transmit a pulse to the ultrasonic transducer. The pulse amplitude, duration (frequency) and damping are as previously.specified by the operator. The receiver . gain and filter settings are as defined by the operator l during setup. The A/D converter in the RDAS accepts the amplified signal from the Remote Receiver and converts the analog signal to a digital data base. I
2. Data Acquisition The RDAS then advises the HP 9836CS that data is being sent and, after digitizing, transfers the data to the HP 9836CS for storage and processing. This entire process occurs once for each pulse of-the transducer (rep rate).
The HP 9836CS receives the data from the RDAS and processes it to generate a color C-scan (Figure 2) in near real time during the scan-process. One line of ; C-scan data is displayed at the end of each Y-axis ' scan, creating a full C-scan of the test area at the completion of scanning. The HP 9836CS stores the complete digitized RF signal and all position coordinate data during the scanning process. The storage space is provided by the SS megabyte hard disk. It should also be noted that all set-up information and operator comments are stored along with the test information.
3. Data Analysis Upon completion of the C-scan, the operator can identify the areas containing discontinuities by the various colors representing high-amplitude ultrasonic signals. The operator can further interrogate these areas by generating a B-scan image (see Figure 3A). A color B-scan image can be created for each stoke of the scanner. The A-scan RF waveform is displayed in conjunction with the B-scan image. The RF waveform is from the set of line images which make up a B-scan (Figure 3B).
An isometric P-cube display can also be generated which will display up to 30 A-scans as received from a given volumetric area of the specimen. Each A-scan can be individually highlighted within this cube to properly identify the largest amplitude (Figure 4). f Rev. 5, 11/18/86 14 IR180 l l r 4
I Figure 2. (C-Scan) - Figure 3A. .. __ ( Ei-Scan ) Figure 3B.
~
(F.F Waveform) Figure 4. (P-Cube) Rev. 5, 11/18/86 15 IR180
4. Archiving Data l
l Upon completion of the test, the operator can transfer all of the test data off-line from the hard disk to a 60-megabyte 1/4-inch cassette tape for permanent storage. This frees a second hard disk for further use and permits the tape to be conveniently stored or sent to a different location for further processing. Because the Intraspect/98 stores the complete digitized A-scan information, the data can be recalled at any future date for further evaluation or more advanced processing, without rescanning the part. E. HARD COPIES Hard copy recording of test parameters and display information can be generated in several ways:
1. A dot matrix printer is provided primarily for text printouts.

2. Photographic reproductions can be readily taken using a polaroid color display camera.

3. High resolution laser printer copies (shown in Figure 5) can be produced instantly with the optional laser printer available from Amdata.
The laser printer converts the eight-color outputs from the HP 9836CS and converts each to a shade of gray. It produces good quality half-tone productions that can be reproduced on any gcod quality copy mcchine. Rev. 5, 11/18/86 16 IR180 __________--_------------------------s-_-----------------------
VSs-
.s sMFL'E' laf%?/?f&n"s% MW$1&MAE
Awir d Wb gM9ayegne a d y
.a e%a. M M t
ma..c.. .n..e. x8.,c$a
. .cr. n.am.B;
4... :- Lo e% 4 1n .. i g ,. ' .n..
+,.. ..u u a .w-r ik ' rok 4 g 3 saaain .
p* ar y g; "as..:ia s t . 1.-,. e-
'..f e??W E .. x scnYdst m
W y h' y' N
J L atPk-d s Md - [ Ap . aux. ww;g ev- a
*a$e}n=f. m u, kLme.n.we.
mam
o. J
.Ld a EE mam b.\ .. . J.E$NW1 l$.,h&7 e
Wi P==;gy # =s steadd?s5"$ ! g ,gippe.1= h $. pal = /
&speqEw.axxn ne n%yVaar=Ah W - 3" U[r-hn4aH@un Hes c .'. n ia y=gt kfpjQTOP)--e . ,13 4 r?5 y ba nc0# ,
n s wsdar4%y$tyNn,n. QC-HPRTHh M ySSk
,KRISCR)TESTest.O wgg h
h ar===:h,es?q! -W
>m iMigw4 aoCPTF ,e ,, @g 1 : k g g nahey d[ -ggs ;%ypkedjn*P g ,i "yM da tjeR' 4 gQ4 w M6Qjf b ll - <
t - gt,g I, EsMdY
' ~ ~ $@@d c, h -
Ei,,m_j$h, - s h gassummm&,Wj$ggigg$g 5 h Figure 5. Laser Printer Copy Rev. 5, 11/18/86 17 IR180
Appendix I PERSONNEL CERTIFICATIONS 6/3/87 IR252 Page I-1
C-E Power Systems Tel. 203/688 1911 Combustion Engineenng. Inc. Telex 99297 1000 Prospect Hill Road Windsor. Connecticut 06095 POWER H SYSTEMS
Revised 12/11/84 LEVEL III CERTIFICATION RECORD ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION METHOD Name: Richard S. Kusy Initial Certification: 8/30/84 Social Security No.: 040-54-1085 Decertified by Examination: N/A Decertified by Examination: N'/A Educational
Background:
New Britian High School, New Britian, CT Central Connecticut State University, New Britian, CT 2 years completed. Presently enrolled in Degree Program in Industrial Engineering Technology. The above named individual has satisfied the Level III certification requirements for Ultrasonic Examination in accordance with Combustion Engineering Procedure for the Training and Certification of Nondestructive Examination Personncl, 00000-ILI-060, Revision 1. Technical basis for certification: Attended Westinghouse 40-hour NDE Level III Review course in August 1984. Successfully passed CE Basic, Method and Specific written examinations in August 1984 with the following scores: Basic 91 x 1/3= 30.3 Method 89.2 x 1/3= 29.7 Specific 96.6 x 1/3= 32.2 Composite = 92.2 Experienced and previously certified at C-E and at Peabody Testing Services as a UT Level II. C-E UT Level II certified from December 1980 through August 1984 with additional Level II certifications in PT, MT & VT.
Passed ASNT Basic Examination in August 1984 and ASNT Ultrasonic Method Examination in November 1984. Certificate No. LM-941.
Eye acuity examination results attached. All historical information supplied by me to compile this certification is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. M 4 . ,- 7 Examinee:f M ., / f Certified b .
/'N
_P./.tlage r Inserv' . nspection
/
Combust on Engineering, Inc. x Page I-2
i l
\ -
Mucumon/sumussmus CERTIFICATION rowan sysTsus enour 1000 Prospect HW Road FOR Post Offee Box soo FIELD SERVICES ACTIVITIES Windsor Connecteut 06095-0500 Richard Kusy 040-54-1085 NAME SOCIAL SECURITY NO DATE .Illi R 1QRg
~
(of Dusnmation') EYE EXAMINATION . NATURAL CORRICTED NEAR V!510N - JAIGER Rf!Lf [Bf / Rf Lf Bf FAR V!510N - $hELLEN R 0 gg gg gg g E gg NO /5' 06 COLOR v!510N ADMINISTERED BY: - ci b , [ ] woot (Holmaren) PHYSICAL EXAMINATION HEIGHT Y WEIGHT l (e 3 BLOOD PRESSURE IW /68 SKIN __ A) EARS rd NECK ./ EYES x1 HEAD ,J HEART CHEST s LUNGS ., 71 _ PULMONARY FUNCTION TEST: NORMAL g ABNORMAL This is to certify that this individual has been examined and to evidanos has been found of any physical cadition thich might be aggmvated by, or attributed to, ocen@ational exposure to ionizing radiation. This irdividual has no history or evidence of previous radiation injury and has no history of en.sedire the limits of 10 CfD 20.101 and is found to be ghysically Wied to perfoon duties involving ocngstional suposures to ionizing radiation. This enemination has also revealmd no indications of aberrent behavior. This individual has buen examined in accordance with MJRED-0041 Section 7.4 arid no evidence has been found of any physical or sental conditions la st&m the une of respiratory protection devices are considered contrairwiicated. THE ABOVE NDIVIDUA IS Ng 00ALIFIED FOR WORK WVOLVING RESPIRATORY PROTECTION DEVICES: LIMITATIONS: CORRECTIVE LENSES d DENTURES O OTHER d C E Medical Department - Dept. 6106-1902 Signature N Medica 1 \samih r P 11 L sget Edward F. Murphy, M.D. (203) 2 5 3339 . Medical Emasiner (Print) Clinic Location Page I-3
SWIISTION ENGINEERING RESUME OF RICHARD S. KUSY: Program Manager, Outage Services
~
Signatur EMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS : Mr. Kusy is responsible for Business Development and Commercial Operations as they pertain to the appropriate NDE Business Unit. He has twelve years experience in nondestructive testing and is presently certified in Ultrasonics as a Level III and Magnetic Particle, Liquid Penetrant, and Visual techniques as a Level II. He is qualified in accordance with NRC Bulletins IE 82-03 and IE 83-02 through successful completion of EPRI Course, " UT Operator Training for Detection of Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking (IGSCC). PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: COMBUSTION ENGINEERING. INC., May 1980 to Present Nuclear Power Systems Program Manager, Outage Services, 1986 to Present Mr. Kusy is responsible to function as an interface between Outage Services and the responsible NDE Business Organization. He constantly studies and analyzes the NDE Service Market to anticipate future development and tha needs of utilities. He provides technical sales assistance including; NDE Presentations, Development of Promotional Materials and Participation in Industry Trade Shows. Additionally, Mr. Kusy continues to function as one of CE's Senior Level III's and periodically is involved in the task management of actual on site NDE examinations. This arrangement keeps him in tune with current plant conditions and allows him to interface with technical plant personnel. Supervisor, Examination Services and Products, 1985 to 1986 As a supervisor, Mr. Kusy was directly responsible for a staff of NDE personnel. He also had the responsibility for implementing NDE techniques at field sites. This was accomplished by assigning the necessary personnel and equipment to complete a task. Additionally, he functioned as a C-E Ultrasonic Level III and administered NDE certification tests, prepared and reviewed NDE procedures. Power Systems 1000 Prospect Hill Road (203) 688-1911 Combustion Engineenng, Irc. Post Office Box 500 Telex: 99297 Windsor, Connectcut 06095-0500 Page I-4
RESUME OF RICHARD KUSX -2 SNE:55780N ENGINEERING Senior Technical Services Engineer, 1983 to 1985
' Functioning as a Senior Engineer, Mr Kusy was responsible for the technical management and performance of specifically assigned field service activities. He prepared and controlled procurement documents, reviewed and commented on drawings, conducted engineering support studies, prepared examination programs including NDE procedures and technical reports. He also acted as an interface between C-E and various utilities and has working knowledge of ASME Code Sections III, V, VIII and XI. While performing these functions, he was certified in Ultrasonics, Magnetic Particle, Liquid Penetrant and Visual Techniques as a Level II.
Development Engineer II, Engineering Development and Services, -- - 1982 to 1983 Mr. Kusy assisted in writing NDE test procedures and programs for various applications to nuclear power plants. He supervised inspection programs to assure compliance to ASME Code Sections III, V and XI, He also has been responsible for the performance of up to 7.5 technicians at field services sites. Development Engineer I, Engineering Development and Services, 1980 to 1982 , Mr. Kusy reviewed NDE proced".res and programs for specific activities at nucleer power plant sites. He was responsible for
~~
the conduct of subcontractors and C-E personnel performing NDE examinations at nuclear field sites. HUGHES AIRCRAET_ CORPORATION, Ground System GIpuo, 1979 to 1980 As a Product Assurance Engineer I, Mr. Kusy was involved with advanced large scale irtegrated circuits. Responsibilities including conducting failure reports, acting as a liaison with customers (AFPRO) and suppliers, and overseeing the assembling - and testing of the AN/PRC-104 Radio. PEABObY TEST ~NG SERVICES, X-Rav Encineerina, 1977 to 1979 At ' technician, Mr. Kusy was qualified as a Level II in four phases of nondestructive testing (Radiography, Ultrasonics, Liquid Penetrant, and Magnetic Particle). He worked on various nuclear power p3 ants and performed NDE tests to ASME Code Sections III, V and VIII. Power Systus 1000 Prospect Hdt Road (203) 688-1911 Combusdon Engineonng, Inc. rost Oirce Box 500 Telex: 99297 Windsor, Connecticut 06095 0500 Page I-5
/
l l EISUME OF RICHARD KUSY ~3-DMSU5 TION ENGINEERING MACRISTY INDUSTRIES, INC., 1975 to 1977 As a Level II Radiographer, Mr. Kusy performed tests on welded and brazed tube assemblies and established techniques used in radiography. These techniques were in accordance with Pratt & Whitney Aircraft specifications. PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIO?lg: - American Society for Nondestructive testing, Inc. ( EEASONAL BACKGROUND: Presently enrolled in a B.S. degree program in Industrial Engineering Technology at central Connecticut State University. As of January 1987 in third year of program. Power Systems 1000 Prospect Hill Road (203) FC81911 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Post Office Box 500 Telex: 99297 Wmdsor. Connectcut 06095-0500 Page I-6
RESUME OF RICHARD KUSY II C 6 5 7 5 0 al ENGINEEltING EXPERIENCE RECORD: 1980 - Project Engineer, UT II Millstone Point Unit 2 ISI UT Level II, TVA, Yellow Creek Unit 2, Auto RPV PSE Examinations 1981 - UT: Level II, ANPP Palo Verde Unit 1 PSE Shift Engineer, UT, VT II, WPPSS 5, Auto RPV PSE Examinations PSE Shift Engineer, UT, VT II, ANPP Palo Verde Unit 3 PSE Auto RPV Examination 1982 - Project Engineer, UT, MT, PT, VT II, Millstone ISI Unit 2 UT , VT Level II, ANPP Palo Verde Unit 3, PSE Auto RPV Examinations UT, VT Level II, FP&L St. Lucie.2, Evaluate Nozzle PSE Indications UT, VT Level II, Millstone Point Unit 3 PSE UT Level II, Crystal City, Rush Island Fossil UT, VT Level II, ANPP Palo Verde Unit 3, Auto RPV PSE Examinations Project Engineer, UT, VT II Maine Yankee Atomic ISI Power Station, Auto RPV Examinations Reg. Guide 1.150 1903 - Project Engineer, UT, VT, MT, PT II, Millstone ISI Point Unit 2 BOP ISI & Auto RPV Examinations, Reg. Guide 1.150 Project Engineer, UT, VT , MT , PT II, Maine Yankee ISI Atomic Power Station UT Level II, So. California Edison, SONGS 2, SID IS1 UT Level II, Iowa Southern Generating Station Fossil UT Level II, FP&L St. Lucie 1 ISI , 1984 - Projoct Engineer, ET, TVA Sequoyah Unit 1 ISI Shift Engineer, ET, So. Calif. Edison, SONGS 2 ISI Shift Engineer, ET, So. Calif. Edison, SONGS 3 ISI Project Engineer, ET, TVA Sequoyah Unit 2 ISI Project Engineer, UT II, Niagara Mohawk, Nine Mile ISI Point Unit 1, CRD Examinations 1985 - Project Engineer, UT III, PT, VT II, Millstone ISI Point Unit 2 Project Engineer, ET, TVA Sequoyah Unit 1 ISI Project Engineer, Steam Generator Radiography ISI Millstone Point Unit 2 Power Systems 1000 Prospect Hill Road (203) 688-1911 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Post Office Box 500 Telex: 99297 Windsor, Connecticut 06095 0500 Page I-7
RESUME OF RICHARD KUSY $NIO*;5 TION ENGINEERING EXPERIENCE RECORD: UT Level III, Georgia Pov4J, Plant Vogtle 1, Auto PSE RPV, Reg. Guide 1.150 1966 - UT Level III, Dresden III, IGSCC Auto & Manual ISI UT Level III, Task Manager, Nine Mile Point 1 ISI UT Level III, So. Calif. Edison 2, Auto RPV ISI Examinations, Reg. Guide 1.150 Task Manager, UT Level III, Vandenberg AFB, I-96 PSI Examinations 1987 - UT Level III, VT II Big Rock Point, RPV Vi.suals ISI UT Level III, Task Manager, Trojan Nuclear Plant ISI Automated I-98 Examinations of Static Cast SS Elbow UT Level III, Task Manager, Morton Thiokol Inc. PSI Automated I-98 Examinations of Solid Rocket Boosters Power Systems 1000 Prospe.:t Hdl Road (203) 688 1911 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Post Offee Box 500 Telex: 99297 Windsor, Connectcut 06095-0500 Page I-8
AFRIL I,.1??7 TO WH0!1 IT MAY C0ttCEPM: itP. YINGDR ZHANG IS HEREBY t4At1ED LEVEL II IN THF ULTRA 3011IC TEST f*ETHOD BY R!1 DATA Itic. THIS CERTIFICAT1011 IS It1 FULL ACCORDANCE llITH F.EC0 fit 1 ENDED PPACTICE #FNT-TC-1 A AS PUELISHED BY THE At1ERICRt1 SOCIETY CDP N0t4DESTPUC'"!E TESTING. FURTHER, THIS CERTIFICATION COMPLIES WITH Rf1LRTA'S WRITTEN CPACTICE (#0AI 2.4, RE'/. O) FOR QUALIFICATION At4D CERTIFICATION OF NDT PER$0 tit 4EL. I I AS EVIDEt1CED EY THE ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMEt4TATIOri, f1R. ZHAtlG HA? SATISFIED THE QUALIFICATION At1D EXAMIttATION REQUIREMENTS. HE HR5 EPOAD EXPERIEt4CE A5 A set 4IOR NDT ENGINEEP, AND HAS EEEN QUALIFIED BY THE ELECTRIC PONER RESEARCH It45TITUTE FOR LETECTION AND SIZING OF IGECC U5It4G EOTH MANUAL At4D AUT0!1ATIC T1 ERNS. HE HA5 PASSED HIS GENERAL, SPECIFIC, PRACTICAL At4D VIEI0t1 EXAMINATI0t15. Ocs .n. & CHARLE? G. VALENTE THIRD PARTY CORPORATE L-III ! LLTFA?ONIC TEST t1ETHOD l l JOHN WEISEt1 BURGER MANAGER, QUALITY AS5URANCE i Page I-9 i
o . 0Al 2.4 pact 13 or 16 R[ VISION Nti. O DA1E D 11/6/8E
.:AMDATA,.INC, Appgoyto EQUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION . APPROVED NONDESTRUCTIVE TESilNG PERSONNEL CER11FICAT10N . EYE EXAMINA110N REPOR1 This examination'ti to .af sare natural or corrected near distance acuity in at ieGst one eye such that - the applicant is capable of reading a mininum.of Jaeger, Umber 2;on a' standard Jaeger test chart at a distance of not less than 12 inches.
The ability to perceive an Ortho-Rater minimum of 8 or similar . test pattern.is also acceptable. Applicant : Yineda Zhanc 1 Em;iiope r: M ATA. Inc _. Ad d're s's : (Street) (Ci ty ) (State) (Zip)
~ Distant Vision Uncorrected: Right Eye 'kf2.o Left Eye */w Corrected: Right Eye %f e a Left Eye Wfo +
Near Vision Uncorrected: Right Eye 8 (o TJ' Ar Jo " l Left Eye T c. +7 3o" Corrected: Right Eye 712 - /O '
/9 _ . _
Left Eye S ,., - f/ - 2 o Applicant has successfully passed examination for: Color Vision ( Yes ( ) No Distant Vision ( v) Yes ( ) No Near Vision ( d Yes ( ) No Limitations /W f , m -;Q- 7; m I l
.l 1 J
Examiner (Signature) [O M Ocu-et /r
,oD Date 3/k #N Applicant (Signature) '( [w/ _ M Date 7/?-e / f 7 )
Level 111 (Signature) / d! u. Date /$ , Page I-10
1
)
t A e s r 6 f u 8 i / o / c 6 g r i . / 3 l V _o n. na t q d
., d 1 n n 1 i a o #., t _r l n .
E T A ( A [2 lL _i r p r r i a h c r fiT l a S e t w a e i r u S o r s o [M 2 o )f 8 e d C p o e O / e o C t r 1 1 n n r a V
/ / i n a r ) I N
N o dd/%V
.C .D 3 /
D
\ 0 1
E E D g n i t i s e d S S n a n i b o o l e c u n 8 9 e p o 2
/
1 ( m 2 K M s T A M E n OE E L r e e / n o r I V V N l / - S O O d i S l I t I e I R R e r b d t s r l h - V P P r o i , n g f y t o c s E P P i i s n S u o o s n' t n r t R A A h n o S o V i a o a i e p C r r o s n c e t a S s C n e n u i i s n t e l i n i t x e o a n a i q n s a r R N D / o n g a a o e : r O n o n r m i v E e e o r i p i T i t n q D b -a I T l i o t c i n N i A t t t a i c e i f CD i p r a n p . i t l z n o n I R t i e g r k i
- e a i FO b r e i e S c o d p s o I C o c n t t S e s i t ._.
TE J s i s n C h a C c , r w _ e r in n o o g e i C c C . - RR D n v t S o p l E . y r l G e l CN E n d d r i O b o i e e t e u I P t r e _ LI J E t t i e c f ET D l a a p g l n c , e l m NA N a a i i . r t r a h NC p g e e e c c OI SF r o c i i i c i t s u q E g t n a in e d m t in e i r n n a m_ RI i n t e 8 o s g ow i h s e ET n i r v 9 E t g c _ PR e r a n D u e n l n e e .
/ _
E ) S P P I 1 N A t E F E T R .
r. C 1 p N
3 i I A 1 l a. T ( s _ 5 t SN 9 e n _ EO t e 4 3 3 2 TI a T d s 8 8 8 8 EA e / / / / m_ VC t T o r 4 1 5 2 _ I I n/ P 1 1 TF CI em - mo
't L yr 3 2 _
RA oF 4 8 3 8 2 T U l 8 / 8 / 8 SQ p / 1 / 0 / E m 4 1 5 1 1 D E N ) O t ) N e e ) e eA t y - N u tr C a t r O n S S A I e ( ( t T v t C A a e . U g r #. R n c t a e m. T a n o i e S h I c s n N t r e ) s r f I a s e o S i E a ,
. h o ty r i i L L t C d t C J d p g a i d l L e
N n d 6 n C A a A ( / C . h i m 7 a r t
. 10 Y A 5 S e f t
p
- C5 .
e N5 : o y c o e t n D a I A el I y r cp t , s
, Y : r n m , i y n AT l e s eE s e e 'TI a y s i a r l AL r o e r t e e t - DA e e l r e a v k MU n m p d p d r
d e 3 m d x m i d ~ AQ G N E A E A n e A U B I s 1 2 __ gO 7C u.
t g 6 6 t n
) c Tk*t .e 1 / , i .
1 U c t s z s r 1 G t e eu i e s u o 0 t f
/e hh C
r ed
,C mC n i
q C i C n c 5 A 1 uS h S h G c l G c e D [Mk. W uI e I E c t t G i r r oT A P 0 ) ( M' r o T rf U u f U cs c s c O dtG
. /
mi
,ami t f
J eC t r x a o e mo a t x a e m
, N 0 D t 2 0 [ E c o 1
V V u n t n t o u 5 O O r o u i a l R R t i a t l v p P st A E p P n a d a d 0 R A A i c n c n t (i a i a n f f e ni l i l l ol a l a a i a u a u v t u n u n i s p q a q a u i m m q e o r d d E Y N c e q e o s r e s s i n s n si e )) D a s a s t x P u P u s (( a M
t e
e a
) e u s r d
( g a e 4 5 e r t 8 8 D G a / / D 4 5 6 6 f os f : f :
,ru 0 0 os os r
oo 4 8 ,a .ra N H ' o e NY oe N Y l i I l e - I v L -
)
e / l y L l / r
/ a a a d Ci C n s y h
oC c C i s t a n N S e S z e t G p G i i i O e c s I 5 I S e h I T M n r ) C C e a n
)
a R U f i i v i noi i i c n) h t 9) a Ti , U eC a r. e h l a N' t e m c a y m g I e a a uN gl o a n o h nN aL E n s h( n( a(h ( C o g i n S N i r r e n j A t e e t i s i R at C t C a e
.U c nN nN r T B l CS g oe e a o
_ NS I AT
.Y A i i
n n a l L C .
/
o o E t Dt N o e C E t D t N o e d p e s n o e g e S h c o r i l TI h h T c l l d t l g AL S I r I r A a o i DA T R a R a ( c C H MU D Ph P h u AQ N E C E C d ) ) E a b _ 3 4 - $1 7C l
,'11 .l
= c . e d B E M f~ t L t
t a
= = 9 = = U .
MO.k.V . f. . r e it pa
= =
m
/OL . rD = .
d& 1 L E n
=# = = . e .
M/2/
. oy e . . . t .
H" i b t ad e=a r = .
. . a . .D . ceo y=d, = . . . . @' )( .
I f op vl = D D C E I t pE r p r r4 =
=/
v O O V . C eA -
- A .
R R =C . . . P P . - . . . r A P A n oy I b
=
r
= z .
t I ad c e v i = e n = /u r - t
. f o m- . . . .
i r p a = x = A. .
. r .
1 nA pE = d . . . e . Q
-= o c . n . . i . . : . . m . . - - . . a . . e = _ . . x . ._ . t = _ . . . E
_ . i e= . . .
. . s d = . . . . o a = . . . p r =! . . . . . m G =9 . . . . . . o = . . . . . C = . . . . . e l r . * . .
a = . n . . .
. * . c = . o . .
_ 5 . . . ._ . _ c . i=0 t = c =
.i t _ n .
_ o
.d a a = 0 .a n . . i . r . r =/ . i . . s .
I . P = . m . . i
. . - . a . . V . n . c r . x . . .
_ o . i = .E . . r . _ . f = . . o .
.ft . n . . . a n
i c = e =
=0 . o . . i _ C l ._ o .
i . p = 8 . s .
. m . S = . . . . . . a . x . d =
[ .i V .
. E .
o = h = t =/ e = t .
. e . y . 0( . . E . ._ . H = . . . .
_ . = . . t _ . . i _ .l ) = . . n . 'g . _ . ac = . . o . i .
. . ri= - . .i . R . . _ e s = 2 . . s . . . . n a = 9 . .i . .
N . . eB = . . . 0 .
. G( = . = .V . r e .
1
. = . . a y .
T . = . . e . E . C . = 7 . N . . U _ n = . . t . R y _ o - 8 . . . T S r _ a . i t
= =
9 1
.f . L .
e . N m a = . . . . I m ce= I., . u . i t = . E S . f a = . C N n .
. iD =m =
Te A i o . t r e
=a =4 d
e d e
. tdt dtd t d t d d
e d
.R U t ._ C =, . c ec ec e c e ce CS a . . et et et et et NS c . l = . rcr cr cr c r c I A i . e= . r erer er e r e f . ve=I =r . or oror or o r . c rcrcrc r c r AT ,Y .i t .. l = n onon on on o TI r e nt - ._ , UCUCUCUC uC AL d rr C . o =
u . h =/. . MO 5 .
. . t = r e =u
_ M = aDQc H Hw t I l ,'
h, \; y , o j i RPRIL:1, 1987-sTO WHOM IT-MRY C0t1CERN:
; fir. IF:I AN SMITH IS HEREBY NRMED ' LEVEL 'I IN THE ULTRRSONIC TEST METHOD I i
FY f.MDATA, INC. THIS CERTIFICATION IS IN FULL ACCORDRt1CE WITH
]
RECOMMENDED PRRCTICE #SNT-TC-1R RS PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING. FURTHER, THIS CERTIFICATE 0t4 COMPLIES WITH.
;RMDATR'S WRITTEN PRACTICE-(#QRI 2.4, REY. 0) FOR QUALIFICATION AND ! . CERTIFICATION OF NDT PERSONNEL.
AS EVIDENCED BY THE ATTACHED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION, MR. SMITH HRS SRTISFIED THE QUALIFICATION RND EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS. HE HRS BROAD EXPERIENCE AS RS NDT TECHNICIAN AND HRS BEEN PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED BY
.0UR PARENT COMPANY,: COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC., FOR MANUAL WELD INSPECTION. HE HRS PRSSED HIS GENERAL, SPECIFIC, PRRCTICAL AND VISION ;
EXAMINRTIOtis. l G44. a* CHARLES G. VALENTE-THIRD PARTY CORPORATE L-III ULTRASONIC TEST METHOD i JOHN WEISENBURGER MANAGERi OURLITY RSSURANCE Page I-14 1
-w...,.- -y . - - . . - _- . i QAl 2A- PAci 13 Dr16 . RIV1510N No. 0- DA1[n11/6/8E "AMDATAblNC.
APPROVED
" ! QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTION APPROVED ~
j l NONDESTRUCTIVE TE511NG PERSONNEL CER11FICAT10N EYE EXAMINATION REPOR1
.. This examination.is to assure. natural or corrected near distance acuity in at q .least- one eye. such that the ap'licant is capable of reading a mininrn of Jaeger. ' ~ Number 2.on a standard Jaeger test chart at a distance of not less than 17 inches. ) yThe- ability to perceive an Ortho-Rater minimum of 8 or similar test pattern is 'also acceptable. , ' Applicant
Bryan Smith Employer: -AMDATA. Inc .-
Address: (Street) i ' (City ) (State) (Zip) Distant Vision-Uncorrected: Right Eye Mu+ , left Eye .-vA + Corrected: Right Eye
. . Left Eye Near Vision Uncorrected: Right Eye _T / - fr # vo /7 ka left Eye f, - vo ro / $P Corrected: Right Eye left Eye Applicant has successfully passed examination for:
Color Vision ( Yes ( ) No Distant Vision ( d Yes ( ) No Near Vision ( ) Yes ( ) No
- Limit ations Wo 4er 'fA h Examiner (Signature) ,c7'N a u % c '
oo Date J/ 'Ac f '7 App}icant '(Signature) _E 3 d f. b Date 3[3C/8) Level:111 (Signature) , M, _Date
., .O Page I-15
WM,b E ) R T T W A L . P .P 1 d n d t ne n a pm a 1M ]M lhn 1 T i s d 1
/ 3 n
Mu' qR 8 , eW 1 # 4O[QM N D D I
/ ~ /
0 1 i i a c i t s e T U g
- nt ni a B
O E E n i i g I V V h l c a s I S O O R R d e e i b I mn P P r T i i o P P l s l . i A A h E n eat D o ve c e N p ez e t s L i p a e ( r s N D / R e n nt i O e n au I l o i p e T t f cm g A . t i p i o a CD t i nc t I R r h u FO b c cf o I C o s eo TE J e T d RR ' D s n E CN so a O b o nm LI J oe e ET id c NA t NC at v. i OI cr r Sr io e Ri l p s ET . pp e PR pu r E ) AS P GC 1 p N 3 i I A 1 z t T SN 5 ( s i EO 9 e e TI t s T a e
~
EA d r VC oP I I tT TF nf - CI em UL mo3 yc 8 RA TU oF / l SQ p 0 E 1 D m N ) E - O t ) N e . e eA t N rC a O e t - t S S I T u( n ( C e U h v R t A T i . S m c t N s I S n o s I c ) e e y
. r r e1 E D ,
a s t u3 C d a h oi d n1 N n t C J C A e5 A a a ( / v 9
.M I i
r d m 6 7 n a r e . A A CS B A 5 S y ct C NS : o no I A el I c . cp r e Y : r nm . a s AT l a e y s eE ah o hI s i t C J - AL r o e r e e r a _ DA n m l p d e d6 n MU p AQ e o m d x m7 a
-' ' G N E A E A5 S 1
2 m J o *(
1-L
6 D
/
1 1 0 E Ek7 U )c. t e -
)
o T , n A
k. m u
i m D [(A dMkM l aU u c n
# i e e O d d #
i r r u t v s a eD s r u c t ( o c C O Cd o , neo n r i l n s n D D 0 E E t c o t ci si t et s
'ro 1 V V u t r e t n s O O r s at a a i R R t c cp r i v P P si i t e s t P P n n nc n p e a A A i o oi a O) D
( s y st r e n a r a et 8t l r n rn e 9 n a i otl He t g n /e t l i r t l a e p U ump ca t s i n eV s eo rI o 1 1 1 p u YN c D Sk d sl l l l a c n ) e e eee r u I
))
D v v v v t h h e eee nC . X c L LL L I ( (( e
s. T B
7 g 6 8 : e nl 8 6 / t i 5 / 68 6 e a t
) - 8 7 8/ / e u f s / 2/3 2 r d a
( g a e 22 26 6 - - 61 - e r ) r t 6 D G d DG a// 1 2 9 2 e D 7 7 /// / s . . 666 1 s 3 3 a S pAA f / ( os f : f : D r os os E e
, u0 oo4 00 0 83 3 0
8
,ra ,a r
( G g e NH oe oe l NY NY l l o o oC h c y S t l e y i v t h n e ) i g u L r y s i m
/ e r r Hm d1 1 1 1 t a e o o u s v aC hT TT T p s i N UMP e n i
O tU e m c n e I o e U A r s T M C n C o o C e ) ) f J U f t n , n i R g i a A o k eo l n T t Ci o si a a S N i n t s )e m t
.a o ot r )e J a C S n e c r e e a b m c s o I
e e e s n a n o E a s e h o (N J(oL y (N a L : C c n a n s J L S( ) e N i i b A t r g e n n i R aB n t a a : r
,U : c EA . a S S l c cS g o r C c r o s aS n L e n n a o jA i /m o , I p : e e h d n l a i e : e c ( ,Y i or t s , s n g S AT a ok s o a o e r TI r ht uJ t d i l h e T cu b d t l g A L a A a o h oA - T Sa r
mn d ( c C f H . t wU O o a m u O tQ N K C S A .
. d ) ) ) - E a b c . ^
3 . 4 N% y[ i l'
t - . n 0 o 9 i - 91 V . t a r e . l i t oa . u
. a .
bG . 4 P
. n . . oy . e . ib r .B t .
a . ceo kk
. t e. . D . 'p .
ad y- . j( ~ I vl . . f op i r t pE -r.h.
.A .
t r p .
. eA . .l o . _
i C .
.C . . n - .
ib t o y r . L
. 4 .
ad e .{ . .
. I c vi en. . b . . . f . . . . ra .
i l a pE , om.A) p x = t r . e
. O aA . p .
n
. ., C .
i m
. e a . . w . x . . . t . . E . . . i e. . . '
sd . . .
~ oa . . . . pr . . mG . o . C .W . . l = .* . . - . a . . n .
s . i c ,. . o
.i . e . t . .d . a . . c a =0 t a
n o
. r . G ..
P r .0 1 .i
. m n i .
s . i .
. a V . . n . c - . x . . o . i = . E r . . i . f - . o . . t . i = ~ . n l . . a . c = 5 . o o . . n . e=
p=6 . i C
. i . . s . m. . S . . i . . a - . V . . x . d = . . E . o= .
ht - }
= A . r . . e- d y . . M . t C . t . . . h . . l) . n g . - . ac ,. o i . . . ri i R . . . es. - 8 . s . . . na . . . . e . 9 .
i V
. . G (B . . . . . . r e . . = . a y . . n - f a .
N e E . t . y . o . 9 . f . r . i . l
. e .
a . t . , . L .
. a . I . .
m u .
. c e i t e. L S . f a . . . D .
I n . i t - R .d d d d d o . r .P . e e e e e i . e .A . tdtdtdtdtd ta .. C .: . cececec ece c . . et et et et et i . l . e- . r crcrcr crc
. r ererer ere f .
I t . r . le.Z v .
,L orororor or . cn rcrcrcrcr ononon on o . UCUCUCUCUC . e . d ,
C .
... o ,lT h
5 . t e ,l _ M ,I m P>. e O $ 1
= , l f k Appendix J LIST OF INTRASPECT/98 DATA TAPES AND TIIE FILES THEY CONTAIN 1 i l 1 l I l 1 06/1/87 Page J-1 IR252
LIST OF.INTRASP"CT DATA TAPES AND THE FILES THEY CONTAIN Tape Files' Notes Tape Files Notes l l UT-1 SETCAL9 Calibration in l UT-4 SETRCL1 SETCAL10 Calibration out Calibration in w/RTD l SETRCL3 Calibration out SET +1 l SETR+1 SET +2 l SETR+2 SET +3 l SETR+3 SET +4 i l SETR+4 ; SET-1 .l SETR+5 SET-2 l SETR+6 SET-3 l SETR-1 SET-4 l SETR-2 I l SETR-3
.UT-2 SETCL1 Calibration in l SETR-4 SETCL3 Calibration out l SETR-5 SET +5 l SETR-6 SET +6 l SET +7 -l SET +8 l UT-5 SETRCL5 Calibration in SET +9 l SETR+7 SET +10 l SETR+8 SET +11 l SETR+9 SET +12 l SETR+10~
SET-5 l SETR+11 SET-6 l SETR+12. SET-7 l SETR-7 SET-8 l SETR-8 l SETR-9 l SETR-10 UT-3 SETCL5 Calibration in l j SETCL7 Calibration out l UT-6 SETRCL7 Calibration out ' SET +13 l SETR+13 SET +14 l SETR+14 SET +15 l SETR+15 SET +16 l SETR+16 SET +17 l SETR-11 SET +18 l SETR-12 SET +19 l SETR-13 SET +20 l SETR-14 : SET-9 l SETR-15 l SET-10 l SETR-16 SET-11 l SET-12 l SET-13 l SET-14 l SET-15 l l SET-16 l ' ll t-06/1/87 Page J-2 IR252 1
s Appendix K EXPLANATION OF INTRASPECT/98 B-SCAN LEGENDS l l Rev. 2, 6/18/87 K-1 IR 252
\
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - . _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J
l EXPLANATION OF INTRASPECT/98 B-SCAN LEGENDS 1 I SC5032.D ~ 1987. n 0-20%
. TROJAN INTRASPECT/98 U1P SM-l' CAL BLOCK REV C4 RDAS Eli,SETCt.11 CHli;ANDATA INC., (C)3' ~'/04/07/87 18:23-10:23 +- FORf4 21-30%
x:-,0.00*.-> -0.50' BY 0.25' q Ax!NL-SC. umN0s 45.00. 0AIN: 53.00 08 31-39% 5' y s 0.00*'->t -4.60' BY 0.05' - DACO OFF SC 8180.00 40-43%+
' TOFs4 AMP37.60s ,91 34% FSH : c.. rF s l-3.05'ky,' CDP USc4 s x2.'41'4y 0ELAY et2.00 % u!DTH gr48.00 A (US)OPsi 2.15? . . w y: g:..
go.60% 61-09%
'$C(x.Y)=( 0.00. -1.30) So=( -2.16 )) e 1/2 U -
C (US) ' +12.00 w,48.00 79 7g3
,, . +w V^&"g4 ns w y$~o <>g%.wr
n *Md'?"
,7s-es%-
90-1 *M
G.
r.: magmk W~k Og M iCm m J;d %p; J w #p- 7w:ijy?;d?
"@m <. ; iga N$.I ,$ &~ hti 'W h, $ % $ h*Kk$$$j N-Q:h;$h( .
8((g .;
?Fri Y9a'#4;>-W-#"F2m gbw$$pj@.FA!&btREi!Mff$
Ny
$2N!ngR'Qlfl N ,$kk kb t & Tfl$?" 'y !N k .f &,
b $\hW p6 Mpg W R
~
25%
& M}.;,As%g+j%@ggpft.;kt.g.5jq\/y;y@f.
G0c f y y uiy c F. N n iit : hmm;@kut,wW- l 1 Legend Explanation (a) INTRASPECT/98 VIP REV C Software revision C (b) RDAS E11 RDAS revision E11 (c) SC5032 D Scan controller revision D (d) TROJAN CAL BLOCK SN-1 Specimen identification (e) FORM: SETCAL11 Form name for testing contents of all information and parameters set for testing (f) CH: 1 Channel number being used (g) 04/07/87 Date of test Rev. 2, 6/18/87 K-2 IR 252
Lecend Explanation (h) 18:23-18:23 Exam time (start-stop) l (i) X: 0.00" --> -0.50" BY 0.25" Circumferential scan pattern starting from 0.0" to -0.50" with a 0.25" interval (j) Y: 0.00: --> -4.50" BY 0.05" Axial scan pattern starting from 0.0" to -4.50" with a 0.05" interval (k) AXIAL SCAN Scan direction is axial (1) ANG: 45.00 45 0 inspection angle (m) GAIN: 53.00 DB Gain setting is at 53 dB (n) DAC: OFF Electronic DAC is off (o) SK :180.00 Skew angle is 180 0 (p) MINUS WELDSIDE Scanner is located on upstream side of weld (q) AMP: 91.34% FSH Amplitude is 91.34% (full screen height) (r) MP: 3.05" Metal path is 3.05" (s) DP: 2.15" Metal depth is 2.15" (t) CDP: 2 . 41 Calculated depth from two known targets (not appicable in this case) (u) SC(X,Y)=( 0.00, -1.30) Scanner position corresponding to the cursor position (v) SD:=( -2.15 ) Search unit distance from o point (for a 45 0 inspection angle, this number is equal to the depth with a full V path inspection) (w) 0 1/2 V One half V path (x) GATE DELAY WIDTH A (US) 12:00 48:00 For A- and B-scan imaging C (US) 12:00 48:00 For C-scan imaging Rev. 2, 6/18/87 K-3 IR 252
Appendix L LENGTH CORRECTION DUE TO BEAMWIDTH
.Page L-1
i l LENGTH CORRECTION DUE TO BEAMWIDTH
1. Select the side drilled hole (SDH) in the calibration block that best represents the depth of targets of interest. If targets are anticipated over a range of depths, select several SDHs.

2. Perform a raster scan with the scanning axis perpendicular to the SDH. The search unit shall be set at zero degree skew (i.e., the refracted beam directed perpendicular to the SDH).

3. Select one of the B-scans and determine the peak signal amplitude from the SDH image. This is accomplished by selecting the A-scan from the B-scan image with the highest signal response. This is A p.

4. Select the A-scan on the left side of Ap where the amplitude response is 50% of Ap (- 6 dB) . Measure the position of the search unit along the scanning axis. This is M 1. For an axial scan, the scanning axis is the Y-axis. For a circumferential scan, the scanning axis is the X-axis.

5. Select the A-scan on the right side of Ap where the amplitude response is 50% of A p (- 6 dB). Measure the position of.the search unit along the scanning axis. This is M 2*

6. Compute Cpg = [M 1 - M2 l, the absolute value of the difference between the positions of the search unit along the scanning axis between the - 6 dB points. C gg is the indication length correction factor to be applied when correcting the length of the projection of an indication parallel to the scanning axis.
Length along scanning axis = Observed length - Cgg
7. .If the length of an indication in the plane perpendicular to the ultrasonic beam is desired, then the Cia factor discussed below must be used.

8. Ccapute Crg = (lMy-M angle in the material.2 l)C yg (cosis0) the , where actualotransducer is the refracted beamwidth. The correction along the indexing axis is equal to the beamwidth (Bg) .
Length along indexing axis = Observed length - Cyg
= Observed length - Bg For a circumferential scan, the indexing axis is the Y-axis. For an axial scan, the indexing axis is the X-axis.
Page L-2 _ -}}

v t e Letter Sequence Other
TAC:65315, (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Acceptance... Administration Questions Answers Results Approval, Approval Other: ML20236B077, ML20236B137
MONTHYEAR1987-07-24 [Table View]

ML20236B137

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

9.0 CONCLUSION

10.0 REFERENCES

1.0 INTRODUCTION

SUMMARY

10.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

N. PROCEDURE

2.0 REFERENCES

Contact:

Background:

Navigation menu

Search