ML20235W301

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Util Rept Re Investigation on Allegation 4-84-A-15 Concerning Harassment of QC Inspectors.Ofc of Investigations Will Review Rept to Determine Whether Addl Info Required
ML20235W301
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek 
Issue date: 05/10/1985
From: Johnson B
NRC
To: Western T
NRC
Shared Package
ML20235W259 List:
References
FOIA-85-594 NUDOCS 8710160117
Download: ML20235W301 (7)
v • d • e


Text

  • d
  1. D o

O

~

i

,==6 f p-kmo.

es' ?. To -

Wech da Feo.,, :

8://

3'o L, s -

SD; eef:'99]h a 6:s.-

4 -84..4-t.c

(.Q.4. -e4-eti.)

efthe.

KGJs-

.)) tkAed o'

cyy s

a eyacf o -

Ne;-

- v es/s, a r'
o n.

Or Yd r's-Ye>

sn ig h f wa n $ h re vle ev

. +.

defer,n:n wAe-7% e, adb// ~ l f:

,p esk y h n ceg u 4.

eh%+

rs lJ.

c cA'o n A /T h f d b

Q O Lf L 0

O ll 0 ddi+;.n a /

in sp <f4/r Hey a A w.

I e-e l

p reya:,ed on 1:

.m Q

R f

o,lle.g a,

o f 7%e e dccmc O E

  • " ~ ' "

{l j!.

' pyeg., fef,, e Amw i f M A "dY p.

i i

y

e. 6,. e.

f-A i r, a n d, i f 'ef a 'A 'b l

1

,.l T

au, M c o n lac / a //eg er-egi n,

SA Mw%e m

  1. k' i

1

\\

g.:

- 1 Ub' t..(

ef PM s,s s,,sxW 1

e710160117 071013 PDR FOIA STEPHENBS-594 PDR..

  • )'

s

jf,;

G Q

\\

i J;

ALLEGATION REVIEW Date: March 12, 1985 CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-015 k

DATE OPENED 02/07/84 8 'dg FACILITY NAME Wolf Creek 50-482 f

SUBJECT Harrassment of QC 1

,.{

N Inspectors i

SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Employee f

-]

NUMBER OF'ALLEG.

ASSIGNED TO

-01

e-CROSS REF. NO.

Q4-84-018 i

6,i ACTION SCHEDULED OI review

.l i

i FIR'ST/LAST NAME R. Herr BATE ASSIGNED l

REPORT NUMBER 1st:

h.;

2nd:

Lst:

FTS NUMBER 8-728-8100

r DUE CATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT l

SORT CODE C

f DATE CLOSED

]

ACTION OFFICE RIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION

!.e
.

ASSIST i s

U(p -j~

, DETAILS:! Mechanical / welding QC inspector was harrassed for writing NCR dealing l

with improper welding amperage by superintendent.

RIV to contact alleger with i

#} regard to. turning allegation over to licensee for review.

01 has indicated an id!/.

nterest.

Report of Inquiry Q4-84-18 issued 4/11/84.

KG&E Report provided for l

l[Ljig: q ~ * 01" review and then returned to Licensee.

Y, Supplemental Q4-84-185 issued and.

A closes all 01 interest.

Need to contact alleger.

Supplemental Q issued by 01 l

i

' Fh on 2/15/85 which closes 01 case.

Need to contact alleger.

. ((

n'

REFERENCE:

OIR4-84-A-0027.

n}4,1, ph l

m+-

a 4.

9-t 1

I i

k Uj n., -

""j, klEGATION DATA FORM O ~vca>" "<cvoev co

'es c~

i instructions on rev:rse side

)

lJ RECEIVING OFFICE Docket Number (if applicable)

' 1. Facility (les) involved:

INerr.el ut mm sten 3. w "

bh n ' (> KLEK C ci D O O V 2 -2 generic. wnte GENERICI hv4 L i A MTd A AroSAS

2. Functional Areads) Involved:

[

~~~

(Chat amoroprisis tuteel1 operations onsite heelth and safety '

4lipf construction offsite health and safety safeguards emergency preparedness J

other (specityl

3. o ecripdon:

15l fid sll'ITI i1Vl51 I II I II I I I I I I I IIl 4

IIIl l l l l 1l 1IIIIl l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l I I

($V1-19141 -1014l2 l l l l l l l l l l l l., I I l l l J

4. Source of Allegation:

' icheck.eparopriate boa) contractor employee security guard licensee employee news media l

~

meu empioyee private citizen l

organization tspecityl

[+-3stk efs

.,(,. other tspecity)

%eh-A - it - A 4

MM DD YY

5. D:ta Allegation Received:

6 9 I

I 2 4 t'D.NIS Klb-

8. N:me of Individual trices two initsele and sees ne,nel Receiving Allegation:
7. Office:

g.7 g y i

ACTION OFFICE MI

8. Astlen Office

Contact:

trirst iwo iniifats end less nernet

9. FTS Telephone Number:

7 2 8

"' 7 /

/ k l

j Open. if followup actions are pending orin progress Closed, if followup actions are completed MM 00 YY

11. D:te Closed:

l m.3m ~:

minayui m e iiiiiiiii,ii (Lims to 50 chatactoral l IIIIIIIII!!IIIIIII I!I i ! !I g.

o,n..

v..,

~-.c

13. Allegation Number:

j y

t j q gl

'O O

S J

j1 L

/

c)fg i",

ALLEGATION REVIEW

.j' CASE NUMBER 4-84-A-094 DATE OPENED 09/11/84 FACILITY NAME Wolf Creek 50-482 SUBJECT (Sensitive)

SOURCE OF ALLEGATION Former contractor employee NUMBER OF ALLEG.

l' ASSIGNED TO 01 CROSS REF. NO.

Q4-84-042 ACTION SCHEDULED Initial inquiry FIRST/LAST NAME R. Herr DATE ASSIGNED 09/11/84 REPORT NUMBER 1st:

2nd:

Lst:

FTS NUMBER 8-492-8110 DUE DATE ALLEGATION SUBSTANT SORT CODE O

DATE CLOSED ACTION OFFICE OIRIV MAN HOURS REPORT PREPARATION ASSIST DETAILS:

(Sensitive) Ref:

04-84-042.

'/ - E Y ~ #

Sa m e A.o l

l

's 9

O)L i

F-' t.

','[ l j,

\\.

_f' 0:

O 8

i l ak (<

j.igy,9;. qf

's.

OZ

- 8 4-7Y-0Y2

- /.s.c e d

//s/t.s

//f/Aro CL/@ /w,1

-to W/.cS$ won A/q/r c Onfacf or ai%yw-To Ar

^ ' ~.

A/4d 4,

  1. mx/wn Gme n..

h.

i. A;47/g{

i.

~SoMe es y f'f.' ) - g S-f-

i i

lI

[

4 1

d l

r,.

~

g.

Jh 'U 4f}/

i

k DOCUMENT LIST

.hY y v : Ik ALLEGATION NO. U ~ W 'N 'TE

  • 9 4 pdD(MENT MAME RECEIPT 4". 9 ;.), RETUltN

-6 A//o a L fe,,e-L-0827l6%

V llf 41 en.

f' bn fou lM a

's

{

l s

i P

$~

s A

'l 1

il 1

l 1

1 h

)

i

ws.sc-I '

A l l. l G M i D h '.

c'

.'e' i

.:s*

g p r.J i...-

p v-

_._d L

Fit t i h'Ifi., V.

. ( '

Doc k e t N u mbe r (if.e p; 1.:,pe,

t Feelhtr(ied InvoNod:

the**'

sst meas 41. e, s li3mIh Ct e e M O

S~ O O D tl 6.lC.'

pews, who M NiniD g

I d

j-

< - f}

f d!.-

2 Funetions1 Arsa:s't invo'Ived;

_}

/k,'

yen.ca app,apria, twiW I

-, oporattons onsite health end sefety h cons tructiori offsite health and safety L.4k se.f e g uards

,, emerg ency prepniedness l

t

.yb I otha r (f. peer (

khf..

p, ;.,,

c( d. d E {. D. !$rl.E d_i.t M __.k b. d....,.

_;...... p I8...D lA...B. !._i.I.

b_N.ltdd...L

-p.

d.

'.d d E,.6.

?.

iD

3. Desedption:

.. -.. J. h.,_. _..t1.

{ LLM,I r..,.

4M

!.R... A.EL11 s..,.c L h. _.,._ t..!.a....dgLb.r..

ALW n

L _.

y k

]. _.] j L.. L '

i..d.

I 17

.pc f T ~1 1 F T T T. L ] t i _. L L L.I 1 1 _1u t.. 3. L t i r

,y

~~~

~~~

4. Source of Aflegation:

QNh m,pw contractof employes secuti'.7 guntd

,.fF iglft licensee employee news mech NRC employee L

private citizen ef;j.

I organization aspecie t r

~

. py%.y I

other (specity)

M t e 4

  • n' Eg/e,w et e j[.

a f.,

y l

.D q

MM DD VV

5. Date Allegation Received:

4

/ "1! /

8 Y 3 ?*s A.

A e c e [41.1

g. Name of Individual triest two ini 1.is and tait n.m.

NN ReceMng Allegation:

7. Office:

g g y

~

ACTION OFFICE l

r.

Te [< be 4 b N M

3. Action Office

Contact:

tr6,si ewe inistets ens t.it n.m.i Q' *s,%

s.y%

l S Telephone Number:

7 p p 7 g, g

'c

.t.b.

N.f., #fjM d'open. If followup ections are pending or in progress j

Closed,if followup ections are completed 5'

MM DD yy N. ~

11. Date Closed:

I l

1 4

I I

-i 1

1 T2. Remarks:

l l l l l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l I

us,*. ie o

.c i

4 e,

i lIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III l

msm Offic.

Yo.:

Numbo,

)

13. AIIegation Number:

lg l,A LI g If f l. y y j l f, i,, a j

Y i'

UNITED STATES

'/

,' )

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s..

[

OFilCE OF INVESTIG ATIONS FIELD OFFICE. REGION IV

', *,,,', [

$11 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE. SUITE 1000 ARLINGTON. TEX AS M011 DATE:

June 29. 1984 REPORT OF INVESTIGATION

}

s TITLE:

WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR POWEP, STAT]0N:

ALLEGED INTIMIDATION OF QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR t

buPPLD'ENT/sl NO.

DN 50-482 C)SE N'JMBER:

4JJ4-00E

0rrR7. 0
~TCE:

Of F? ELD OFFTCE: REGION IV STATUS:

CLOSED lim h h ?!C'h 0",Di/ES"'il7?ON:

p -

knut ry.'0, ? 9El - Mer::h 9, l.904 1

w w m m m.:. o d 4.f;c h g.

M

Axe

- m,,.n m >u'.; a r

/1.

e s.v.,.3. e n,m q...vg.;;e. :,y y geg.3, g.,,fo7,y

/

l' qi,';';;'; > \\*L, u mi,%,

i I: ": W."'t

d W ' C.'*<* ? D u

l, j

(r!

t
> ' P.M7 HT.3% %il C

,~d' M ',

\\

c

(

,\\

/

/

,e j

'j~,'l,f,(,Nfjh.f

$.g',kfl.hll. ~- ~...~ ~ ~.~,- ~ -

f) y r

k Df' i:t of Wa t t;a tuu f u', a y,. ;

te;,,v,i w.

2 _.

~6h. 'W1bw.A.C

^

hTgerVortune, thp7tTTirec'iTfG Offic A:f Investigations

//

/

,!/'

Y" __ )

]

f)ff b'eerr1. Hayes, Dire APPROVED By:

_ f)y g

j, office of Investigate s

pg318hM1888)[p G

- - ~ -

- --~ j i

Sim ARY An allegation was received by the Office of Investigations Field Office, Region IV, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC), taat a Daniel International Corporation (DI) Quality Control (QC) inspector at the Wolf Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Burlington, Kansas, had been intimidated by a DI senior QC superybor. The alleged intimidation caused the DI QC inspector to terminate his employment becaush Ms freedom to report nonconforming conditions had been eliminated.

l The DI QC inspector was interviewed and stated that he had been the subject of l

a meeting wherein a DI senior QC supervisor made intimidating statements to him, including the statement, " Cooperate with construction." The DI QC inspector stated that he performed all his inspection duties in a proper manner; however.

l he voluntarily terminated his employment 23 days after the date the alleged intimidation occurred because he believed that his freedom to report l

nonconforming conditions had been eliminated.

I g

A DJ QC leed henger inspector who was a witness to the alleged act of intirni-Gtior: and who kept a diary of the incident was interviewed. This QC lead hayer inspe: tor pro <1ded the diery to the reporting investigator.

The diary

  • e'400 7 14 me the meeting took place and the quotes and comments that were t

ut.tv W F ser:f or Q: supervisor to the DI QC inspector.

The quoted i

ery :y Wee ir, m der,< is, "Everyone in this seg. will cooperate, m ut g : T'"

?:*e et "ncNf fng" was written using a shorthand symbol) 7-W " T.t n it c '

ns: x % t.rp over nitpick problems."

r; 7 u J ; w t

,$l vN v ::" M d 4TeOy made the intimidating statements was vue.;rw: t! vr h WM Fy honridating statements to the DI QC 4

vmw;;r i.* ;uis p x.

% :n seMoe QC supervisor stated that statements Mke, "Cemara:e ute ms mmon* or any other staternents,of that type would, if' stated b,t a suceniser in nts position, be intimidating t} QC personnel.

Subsequently, this same 01 senior QC supervisor was reinterviewed at his own request the next day and admitted mating the following statement to the DI QC inspector in question, "There is no room in this organi?ation for people who

\\

/

i cannot work together;" however, he denied making the statement, " Cooperate with construction." The DI senior QC supervisor denied attempting to intimidate the DI QC ' inspector, even though he acknowledged that a statement like " cooperate with construction" is an intimidating statement.

f

).

The DI project QC inspection manager who is the DI senior QC supervisor'k s immediate supervisor was interviewed and stated he was aware that a meeting g occurred between a QC inspector and the senior QC supervisor; however, he

's denied having any other knowledge concerning the meeting.

h*

i.

l l

e t

O s

L 1

l i

i i

_ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20235W301&oldid=3945361"