ML20235R653

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to Procedure CPP-025, QC Inspector Qualification Evaluation
ML20235R653
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 07/16/1987
From: Hausel J, Zill R
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20235R515 List:
References
CPP-025, CPP-25, NUDOCS 8710080141
Download: ML20235R653 (5)


Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ -

6 Paga 1 of 4

'4 EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION

,rq N-]

FOR INFORMATION ONLY COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC +,CTION PLANS PROCEDURE NO:

CPP-025 REVISION:

1 ISSUE DATE:

07-17-87 QC INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION EVALUATION 1

W 7

Prepared by:

Date:

2- /d "b]

Approved by:

Date:

On-SiteQAR$yjesentative 7![G k'7 Approved by:

u4 Date:

/

I QA Review Team ' Leader O

m,, amu Fane i

i t

1 CPP-025 Rsvision:

1 q

1.0 PURPOSE V

This procedure establishes measures to ensure that appropriate deviations are evaluated in accordance with Issue-Specific Action Plan (ISAP) I.d.1 and any further reinspection conducted.

2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure is applicable to deviations concerning ASME and/or non-ASME inspector certification reported as a result of ISAP VII.c reinspection / documentation reviews and evaluated by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator.

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 CPP-010, " Preparation of Deviation Reports."

3.2 ISAP I.d.1, "QC Inspector Qualifications."

3.3 QI-005, " Evaluation of Inspector Performance."

4.0 CENERAL

[

Deviation Reports (DRs) which document apparent deviations concerning QC inspector certifications are forwarded to the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator in accordance with Reference 3.1.

Consequently, the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator verifies that the reported condition is a departure from the established requirements and, as required, makes a determination relative to the qualification of uncertified inspectors. Finally, samples of the work performed by any unqualified QC inspectors are reinspected and evaluated in accordance with Reference 3.2.

4.1 Responsibilities 4.1.1 ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator l

The ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator validates DRs l

associated with QC inspector certification and, as required, makes determinations relative to the appropriateness and scope of any reinspection.

4.1.2 QA/QC Review Team Leader and ISAP VII.c Issue j

Coordinator As required, the QA/QC Review Team Leader and the ISAP VII.c Issue Coordinator concur in decisions (not) to

)

implement Phase III of Reference 3.2.

i O

2 J

yz j

i CPP-025

j 7,-

Revision:

1 1

I 4.2. Policy Activities performed'under this procedure shall conform to the policies contained in the latest Comanche Peak Response Team-Program Plan, and the applicable ISAP.

3 Should an activity be designated as the responsibility of a.

Coordinator, or higher, it may be delegated by that individual to an individual under his-or her supervision.

4.3 Conflicts In the case of a conflict between this procedure and the -

documents referenced in Section 4.2, the latter shall govern.

4.4 Definitions None.

5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Certification verification Upon their receipt, the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator determines the validity of DRs that document apparent

'O deviations relative to QC inspector certification.- Should the Coordinator verify that documentation relative to the inspector's certification is unavailable, the DR is denoted as valid, then signed and dated by the Coordinator.

NOTE: Should a DR be invalid, the Coordinator records reasonable justification which supports the conclusion on it, enters "N/A" to indicate "not applicable" in the spaces provided for the signatures of the first reviewers and originator, then signs and dates it.

l The Coordinator ensures that any information used in the validation process is traceable to an acceptable source document and is referenced on the DR.

Any attachments are indicated on the DR.

Due to the extensive reviews required to be conducted by the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator to determine the validity of the DRs, the Coordinator is responsible for their disposition.

Therefore, the signature concurrence of the originator and/or the first reviewers in validity determinations of DRs relative to QC Inspector certification is unnecessary.

3 L___---_---------.------

d CPP-025 5

Revision:. 1 f3 DRs determined to be (in) valid are transmitted to, then V'

subsequently distributed and controlled by, the QA/QC Records Administrator in accordance with Reference 3.1.

DRs are also l^

'l evaluated in accordance with Section 5.2.

5.2 Qualification Determination The ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator conducts reviews to determine whether any QC inspectors lacking certification documentation were qualified to conduct inspections. The Coordinator documents the results of the reviews on Inspector Certification Evaluation Summary forms, then forwards them to the responsible QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineers for their review with respect.to the effect on the quality of construction and' adequacy of QA/QC at the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station.

Should it be evident that an individual was unqualified to conduct inspections, the ISAP 1.d.1 Issue Coordinator, the 1

ISAP VII.c Issue Coordinator, and the responsible QA/QC Discipline Engineer (s) determine whether to reinspect any work.

It may be unnecessary, for example, to reinspect work when any additional data can be expected to have a negligible affect on the conclusions already formed.

The ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator ensures the preparation of a l

O, memorandum which provides reasonable justification for (not) implementing Phase III of Reference 3.2.

The memorandum, addressed to (the ISAP VII.c)' file, shall indicate the concurrence of the individuals involved in the decision concerning the implementation of Phase III of Reference 3.2 and the QA/QC Review Team Leader. The Coordinator distributes copies of the memorandum to the:

CPRT Program Director for information.

CPSES QC Coordinator for information.

Responsibic QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineer for review.

The ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator ensures reinspection of any work performed by unqualified QC inspectors are accomplished and documented in accordance with Reference 3.3.

6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 QC Inspector Qualification Flow Diagram.

O 4

- - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ -.1 CPP-025 f,

Revision:

1 QC INSPECTOR QlJALIFICATION FLOW DIAGRAM DR PE:

INSPECTOR ISIGNED BY THE FIRST REVIEWER CERTIFICATION 1 AND THE OA/0C LEAD ENGINEER.

I f I.d.1 ISSUE COORDINATOR I f INSPECTOR YES DR CERTIFIED INVALID 2 7

NO 2

37 INCLUDES JUST!FICATION RE: INVALIDATION.

(

CC: CA/QCLEADENGINEER OR l

FOR REVIEW AND TUGC0 k-VALIO

\\

FOR NCR EVALUATION 3 f 3!NCLUDES THE BASIS FOR SU kRY CC: TUGC0 FOR CORRECTIVE k-ACTION.

SHEET 3 THE DETERMINATION.

l I

r i

NSP. QUAL.

SUMMARY

YES DEMONSTRATED SHEET

?

ACCEPT 4BLE 3 r y

SUMMARi QA/QC LEAD ENGINEER

-I FOR REVIEW l

SHEET UNACCEPTABLE i

  1. m 3 I

(

CC: CPRT PROGRAM DIR.,

MEMO RE-TUGCO AND THE QA/0C k-PHASEIi!

4!NCLUDES JUSTIFICATION FDR 4

(NOT) IMPLEMENTING PHASE III.

LEAD ENGINEER.

IMPLEMENTAT10N A

.a