ML20235R639
| ML20235R639 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 07/16/1987 |
| From: | Hausel J, Zill R EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235R515 | List:
|
| References | |
| CPP-018, CPP-18, NUDOCS 8710080136 | |
| Download: ML20235R639 (6) | |
Text
__
Pa3s 1 of 3
=
1 (3,
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION O
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS PROCEDURE NO: CPP-018 REVISION: 2 ISSUE DATE: 07-17-87 FORINFORMkTION ONLY l
QA/QC INTERFACE WITH THE DESIGN ADEQUACi "ROGRAM o
i l
N.)
i 1
i 7
\\
PREPARED BY:
DATE:
i APPROVED BY:
DATE:
7- / [o - @ 2 ON-SITE QA REG ESENTATIVE 7 !/(o /'E 7 APPROVED BY:
DATE:
1 QyQfREv1Eu1EiMtEiDER BQOO$$,0!I$ eh o
\\_,I 1
l
j l
CPP-018 Revision: 2 1.0 PURPOSE 7s
's-)
f This procedure establishes the method by which the Quality of Construction, QA/QC Adequacy Program personnel interface with members of the Design Adequacy Program (DAP) consistent with Reference 3.1.
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure is applicable to the data identified in Attachment 6.1,
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 DAP-19, " Processing and Review of DAP/QAP Interface Transmittals."
3.2 CPP-016 " Safety Significance Evaluation of Deviation Reports."
4.0 GENERAL QA/QC Review Team personnel interface with the DAP to solicit comments, ensure any necessary action, and/or to transfer data of an informative nature.
l
("'g/
Transmittals prepared and processed in accordance with this
(,,
procedure ensure effective lines of communication between the QA/QC Review Team and the DAP as required by the CPSES Comanche Peak Response Team Program Plan.
4.1 RESPONSIBILITIES 1
4.1.1 QA/QC Interface Coordinator l
The QA/QC Interface Coordinator is responsible for the l
effective implementation of this procedure and for the control and distribution of CPRT Document Transmittals and any DAP responses to those transmittals.
4.2 Policy Activities performed under this procedure shall conform to the policies contained in the latest CPRT Program Plan, ERC Management Program Plan, and applicable issue-Specific-Action Plans.
4.3 Conflicts In the case of a conflict between this procedure and the i
documents referenced in Section 4.2, the latter shall govern.
e
(
4.4 Definitions
\\-
None 2-a
.]
I CPP-018 Revision: 2-5.0 PROCEDURE f-~g
'I s
5.1 CPRT Document Transmittal Form 5.1.1 Preparation The QA/QC Interface Coordinator ensures that the data identified in Attachment 6.1 are transmitted to'the DAP Coordinator as required. Other than Safety Significance Evaluations, data sent for review and comment,-or action is forwarded via a CPRT Document Transmittal similar to Attachment 6.2.
Safety Significance Evaluations are transmitted to the DAP, RTL in accordance with Reference 3.2.
5.1.2 Distribution and Control The QA/QC Interface Coordinator ensures that CPRT Document Transmittals are recorded in a log which indicates:
The date of the transmittal Whether the transmittal was for " action" or
" review and comment."
l
/
The document title Any appropriate comment, e.g.,
"NECESSARY I
ACTION ACCOMPLISHED 10/30/85," or " REVIEW AND COMMENT REQUIRED BY 4/29/86."
l The QA/QC Interf6ce Coordinator distributes the document and the CPRT Document Transmittal to the DAP
]
Interface Coordinator and, as required, to QA/QC Review J
i Team Personnel.
l 5.2 Resolution of Comments l
The QA/QC Interface Coordinator ensures that any comments or plans of action received from the DAP are considered and resolved by the appropriate QA/QC Review Team personnel prior to the completion of the subject issue.
When data is received for " Action" from the DAP, written l
responses snall be provided.
l 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 Interface Data i
[)l 6.2 CPRT Document Transmittal Form (Sample) 3 i
i Attachmant 6.1 e
CPP-018 Revision: 2 Page 1 of 2
/~%
INTERFACE DATA
)
I s- '
I l
Review Action-i ITEM Info Comment By
)
Only by DAP DAP j
ISAP Results Report X
Information on design X
{
related issues dis-1 covered during int,pec-tions and document reviews or reviews of external sources Selection of design-X related attributes for CPRT inspection activities A
j Information on root X
i j-(j cause analyses (no design concerns) i Information on root X'
cause analysis (design I
related concerns identifled)
Information on generic X
l implications evaluation 1
l (no Besign related l
concerns)
{
1 Information on gener1c X
l l
implications evaluation 1
(design related concerns I
identified) l l
l I
f ~g
\\
---_---_-n
e.1 CPP-018 Revision: 2 Page 2 of 2 INTERFACE DATA (Continued)
Review Action ITEM Info Comment By Only by DAP DAP Reinspection / Document Review Program Information Without Applicability to Design Sample Selection:
l Population Descriptions X
Population Checklists X
QA/QC Program Deficiencies X
l Results X
Collective Evaluation X
Report Adverse Trend Analyses X
l O
Safety Significance X
Evaluations (including construction deficiencies) l Design Deviations X
Noted by QOC/QA Safety-Significant X
Design-Related Deficiencies O
li l
a Attachmsnt.6.2 '
CPP-018 Revision: 2 Page 1 of 1 CPRT DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL FORM
'i 1
COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM DOCUMENT TRANSMITTAL Tot John Honekamp.
From-Design Adequacy Program QA/QC Interface Interface Coordinator coordinator Date The attached document is transmitted fort ACTION REVIEW AND COMMENT (No Action Required)
Document Title / Revision /Date 9
i Transmittal Comments:
O
\\
V Follow-up Assignment (By DAP):
Assigned to:
By: __
Date j
.1 l
Follow-up Comments:
l l
1 l
l O
i
?
i