ML20235H578
| ML20235H578 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1987 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Schnell D UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235H581 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8707150187 | |
| Download: ML20235H578 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000483/1987017
Text
1
'
.
..
i
JUN 3 01987
'
Docket No. 50-483
Union Electric Company
ATTN:
Mr. Donald F. Schnell
Vice President - Nuclear
Post Office Box 149 - Mail Code 400
St. Louis, M0 63166
i
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. J. P. Patterson
and others of this office on June 2 through June 4, 1987, of activities at the
Callaway Nuclear Power Plant authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-30
and to the discussion of our findings with you and others of your staff at the
conclusion of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
.
l
interviews with personnel.
l
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection; however, one weakness was identified which will require corrective
I
action by your staff.
This weakness is summarized in the " Exercise
'
Weaknesses," enclosed with this letter.
As required by 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E
(IV.F), any weaknesses that are identified must be corrected.
Accordingly,
please advise us within 45 days of the date of this letter of the corrective
actions you have taken or plan to take, including the estimated dates of
completion.
l
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this
letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the
NRC Public Document Room.
l
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
Q h5gcu 0500o493
" Original signed by W. Snell*
l
e7 870630
1
O
W. D. Shafer, Chief
Radiological Protection Branch
l
Enclosures:
y
l
1.
Exercise Weaknesses
'e
2.
Inspection Report
./
No. 50-483/87017(DRSS)
See Attached Distribution
)
i
RIII
RI I
RI
RIII
R Ip
RIII
ff
\\u
C'
-
'
wGS n
Pat rson/nma
P
W
l
gg nd
Shafe
g;h
$er
r.
,;
suo
w. ,
__
,-
-
. - - -
-_
.e-
Union Electric Company
2'
Jl)N 3 C) 1987
!
Distribution
cc w/ enclosures:
A. P. Neuhalfen, Manager Quality
Assurance
Gary L. Randolph, General Manager,
Nuclear Operations
DCS/RSB (RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
Region IV
'
Resident Inspector, Wolf Creek
K. Drey
Chris R. Rogers, P.E.
Utility Division, Missouri
Public Service Commission
SNUPPS
0. Matthews, EPB, NRR
R. Bissell, FEMA, RVII
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
. . -
l
Exercise Weaknesses
The medical drill portion of the exercise, which included a burning car with
an injured, radioactively contaminated man, was evaluated as being unacceptable.
Several key response aspects relating to following Emergency Implementing
Procedure, EIP-ZZ-00224, Injury or Illness for Callaway Injured Person, were
not adhered to.
These included, among others, the lack of cordoning off the
contaminated area from the clean area around the accident, contaminated survey
results were not relayed to the Control Room, the lack of gloves in the
treatment of the injured man by the Medical Emergency Response Team (MERT),
and the lack of demonstrating the transfer of the injured man to a stretcher
further away from the accident _ scene.
Additional detail is listed in
Section 5d (50-483/87017-01).
!
1
l
i
l
'
l
l
l
l
l
. - - - - - . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _