ML20235D996
| ML20235D996 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/15/1987 |
| From: | Baldwin T, Husar I, Keller J Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-3-I-FEMA-002, OL-3-I-FEMA-2, NUDOCS 8709250441 | |
| Download: ML20235D996 (40) | |
Text
__ , . - -
g?. _ _* . _ ' -
e ,
77 9. ,
, ffh/) ; ;l
[c; Nd-32 f 2 - Cd 3 .
wgg '
M l:
7/ j$lg'j; ,
.- 2- TEM A ^2-- ~'87 SEP 17 L All .:03 L' cat ,i.,
- 00Cr;n#= , i : dit :
- j
(.
.CPthdu 1
. UNITED STATES'0F AMERICA. :j ^
L ' NUCLEAR. REGULATORY. COMMISSION
.Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board) ;
\
1 In.the Matter of- )
l LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY .) Docket No 50-322-OL-3
)-(Emergency. Planning). '
(Shoreham. Nuclear ~ Power )
Station, Unit 1 )
l' DIRECT TESTIMONY OF .
THOMAS E. BALDWIN, IHOR W. HUBAR -!
. JOSEPH H. KELLER
~
l .
I i
I l
1 8709250441 070715 PDR ADOCK 05000322 0 PDR
-1
-l 1
- )
r i
f J
q l
UNITED STATES OF AMFRICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION {
s I
Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board' i In the Matter of . ) ..
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING' COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 l .
) (Emergency Planning) 1 (Shoreham Nuclear Power )
Station, Unit 1 )
DIRECT TESTIMONY OF THOMAS E. BALDWIN, IHOR W. HUSAR JOSEPH H. KELLER l
I l
l l
4 W
' ,,, ggatent tenutssieu h.M.M 7 u Aw MW
- n a
,,,m. - ,,,,m. - ,
tat i.e.'
..t o"'r T'~ ut. . . . - '
ett.f )
..,.e. e a
E____________ - _ - . _ - - _ - - - - - - - - -
?
l l
i
- -Q.l. Please state your name and_ business address.
A. Thomas E. Baldwin - Argonne National Laboratory,
- 277 Main Street, Second Floor Port Washington, NY 11050 A. Joseph H. Keller - Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Company, Inc.
P.O. Box 4000 Idaho Falls, ID 83401 A. Ihor W. Husar - Federal Emergency Management Agency 26 Federal Plaza New York, N" 20278 i
Q.2. Do you have statements of professional qualifications?
A. Yes. Our statements of professional qualifications are attached to this testimony.
Q.3. When did the panel members first become involved in emergency planning in general and specifically when did they first become involved in a review of the radiological emergency planning as it relates to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station? ) .
j l
l l
_. __.___________________J
1 I'
A. With respect to Messrs Baldwin and_Keller, these questions were addressed in the FEMA prefiled testimony in these proceedings dated April 17, d
1984.
Mr. Husar first became involved in emergency planning while serving in the U.S. Army on active ,
duty as a Military Intelligence Officer from j 1968 to 1972. From 1972 to 1979, Mr. Husar, after joining Career Federal service, specialized in security planning, working for several Department of Defense agencies. In 1979, he ;
joined the Defense Civil Preparedness Agency, one !
of five predecessor agencies of the Federal l Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). With that l agency, in the New York office, Mr. Husar l monitored and evaluated nuclear attack plans of state and local governments. After FEMA was formed in July 1979, Mr. Husar continued -
involvement in emergency planning. From 1980 to 1982, Mr. Husar was responsible for the FEMA review of off-site radiological emergency preparedness for commercial nuclear power plants in New Jersey and New York. During that time, he served as Chairman, Regional Assistance Committee (RAC).
In 1983, Mr. Husar was selected as Branch Chief, l National Preparedness Programs. In that '
l capacity, he was responsible for Federal government preparedness programs in FEMA Region II. In that capacity Mr. Husar was responsible for assisting Federal Agencies in the Region in developing plans for national security emergencies.
In June 1986, Mr. Husar was reassigned to the FEMA Region II Natural and Technological Hazards Division as Supervisory Hatural and Technological Hacards Programs Specialist. At that time, he was also appointed as RAC Chairman. . Mr. Husar first became involved in a review of radiological emergency planning as it relates to the Shoreham -l Nuclear Power Station on October.6, 1986, based I on a request from the Agency's headquarters to review LILCO plan revisions 7 and 8. Mr. Husar, in his capacity as RAC Chairman, oversaw the technical review and consolidation of the RAC j review of Revision 7 and 8 of the LILCO i Transition Plan, l lj
- Since the consideration and transmittal of the RAC Review of LILCO's Transition Plan, Revision 6, 7 and 8 on December 19, 1986 to FEMA
- Headquarters, Mr. Husar's involvement from that date to the present has centered around required actions in connection with the two Shoreham ASLBs (OL-5 and OL-3).
i 1
1 i
i i
l l
..................~y. - . .. . . _ . . , .......... . . -. . . , . . . . . .. . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . - _ -_ _ _ _ --
e In the following testimony, FEMA has assumed that the reopened record will cover l'ssues similar to those initially raised by CONTENTION 24.0 and by the factors
- remanded to the hearing Board by ALAB-832 with regard to 1 Reception Center issues. FEMA has, however, transposed the latest version of the LILCO plan, i.e. Revision 8, into the ,
conceptual setting of.the above issues. In addition, the i i
four additional issues accepted in the December 11, 1986 Board Order will be addressed below.
1
i e CONTENTION 24.0 ISSUE: There are no relocation centers available for a
- significant portion of the anticipated evacuees.
ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan separates the functions of a relocation center into reception center functions and sheltering functions. This testimony will only address the reception center functions which are registration, radiological monitoring, and decontamination, if necessary.
As stated in the RAC review of Revision 8 of the j plan, there are three reception centers '
designated for the general public. The following three LILCO facilities have been designated (OPIP 4.2.3): Bellmore, Hicksville, and Roslyn '
Operations Centers. No letters of agreement are ;
I needed for the use of these facilities in an emergency, since these facilities are owned by LILCO. The facilities identified in the original I contention (i.e., Revision 3 of the LILCO plan) were not owned by LILCO and thus required letters of agreement for their use. It is FEMA's position that there are now reception centers I specified for the general public. However, as stated in the RAC review, under element J.12, the ;
adequacy of these facilities as reception centers would have to be reviewed in a future exercise.
Such a review would involve a visual inspection of the facility, completely set up as a reception center, for a general verification against the plan description.
1 With regard to the number of evacuees to be planned for in an emergency, NUREG 0654 element J.12 states:
Each organization shall describe the means for registering and monitoring evacuees at j relocation centers in host areas. The '
personnel and equipment available should be l capable of monitoring within about a 12-hour i period all residents and transients in the l 1
1 I
. CONTENTION 24' (Continued)
. plume exposure EPZ' arriving at relocation centers.
The issue which must be addressed is the definition of. ,
, an acceptable value for the "all.... arriving" phrase I i
within element.J.12. In the earlier hearings on this issue before-the~0L-3 Board,-the1 FEMA witness panel testified that, based on experience. gained from-natural disasters, the number of~ people that seek ]
temporary sheltering is,in i the range of 10-15 % of the-population instructed to evacuate. The number of 1 people seeking monitoring, regardless of1their need I for temporary sheltering, may be larger than the number of people who would seek' sheltering. Therefore-it is FEMA's position that a 20% figure is a reasonable figure to be used as a planning basis for compliance with NUREG 0654 element J.12 for monitoring <
within about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. .This position-has been stated )
in the December 24, 1985 letter from R. Krimm to. NTH'
- i Division Chiefs, a copy of which has been served on all parties by FEMA counsel. The approximate.12-hour l period for the radiological monitoring of evacuees is a j recommended target for planning purposes and for 1 evaluating monitoring capabilities.
Unlike the element on monitoring, NUREG-0654 sets no-time parameters for the performance of decontamination i
activities. Good health physics practice-would l indicate that decontamination of any contaminated I evacuees would be done as soon as is feasible. NUREG-0654 also establishes no parameters for the numbers of q people which the decontamination facilities should be l able to accommodate.
l l l 1
, REMAND ISSUE A ISSUE: The location of the three reception centers
- and their distance from_the plume EPZ boundary might cause transportation and traffic problems.
ANSWER: FEMA has no position on this issue. The NRC will sponsor a witness to address this issue.
l i
i f q
1 1
l
- --- -_-__-._m _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ , ,
1 1
]
< REMAND ISSUE B !
i l
ISSUE: .The location and distance of the three ,
- reception centers from the plume.EPZ boundary 'j might cause problems due to the shadow J evacuation phenomenon.
ANSWER: FEMA has no position on the issue as stated, j
)
l 1
I I
i l
1 I
l l
l I
1
N -
- . s I.
_10 .
f 4
REMAND ISSUE C
. ISSUE: The proposed-use of the three reception centers requires authorization under State.
environmental laws.
ANSWER: . FEMA has no position on this11ssue, except.
that FEMA is not aware that any'otherinuclear-
. power plant-in New York has had to have authorization under State: environmental laws for the reception centers'in the respective plans for-the various sites.
l l
i
i
- REMAND ISSUE D ISSUE: The decontamination activities, if needed,
- which will be accomplished at the reception 1 centers, might create health and safety j problems by contamination of the public water supply.
ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan (OPIP 3.9.2, j Section 5.2.11) states that contaminated {
liquid wastes' which have been contained will l be transported to the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station (SNPS) for diaposal. If containment
] i is not possible, the liquid waste will be diluted and dispersed. ]
1
- The fact that decontamination is necessary is a result of a radioactive release which contaminates personnel and/or vehicles. j There are two ways in which contamination can i be brought to the Reception Center. First, evacuees and/or their vehicles intercept a l portion of the airborne plume which would have otherwise deposited on the fixed i surfaces in the plume path. Second, ;
contamination could be picked-up by 1 evacuees or their vehicles from an area j previously contaminated by plume passage.
The act of reporting to a reception center for monitoring and decontamination does not j create contamination (radioactive material); !
it merely facilitates the movement of a i portion of the radioactive material I which was released to the environment by the incident.
1 A potential threat to a water supply 1 (underground aquifer) is not caused by the 1 process of decontamination of personnel and vehicles. If a threat exists, rain or snow falling on the surface of the land mass, l which would also have been contaminated ,
l by the plume passage, would have a much . l l greater potential for contamination of the !
aquifer. The problem, if any, created by the '
disposal of decontamination solutions is trivial when compared to potential problems resulting from leaching of radioactive !
material deposited on the fixed surfaces in the plume path. .
1
l
, ~S
!. l
-lu'-
I
- REMAND ISSUE D i k
(Continued) s j
It is FEMA's position that the method !
proposed for the disposal of liquid waste i
+ generated by the decontamination of offsite l Personnel and equipment is generally l
(
acceptable. The plan lacks specific details
, on the size of containment tanks and how and where the disposal of uncontained-liquids ;
will occur. However,.it should be noted that j the LILCO plan contains about the same detail {
as other plans approved by FEMA Region II for *
)
other nuclear power sites in the region.
In addition, the U.S. Environmental ,
Protection Agency (EPA), Region II office, issued a letter stating that, in essence, the method proposed in Revision 8 of the LILCO plan is an acceptable'means of dealing with contaminated liquid wastes generated by decontamination of offsite personnel and vehicles in an emergency. In-the draft revision of the EPA Manual of Protective Action Guides and Protective Actions for j Nuclear Incidents (EPA-520/1-75-001) dated i June 27, 1986, the stntement is made on page l 7-36; "Do not _aste w (emphasis added) efforts trying to contain contaminated wash water",
when discussing the control of surface contamination on persons and equipment.
This statement is in agreement with the previous EPA Region II letter.
l l
l l
l l
- REMAND ISSUE E ISSUE: The distance between the boundary of the ,
I plume exposure EPZ and the designated reception centers will unacceptably increase the radiation exposure of contaminated individuals.
ANSWER: The three reception centers designated in Revision 8 of the LILCO plan are
~
approximately 40 miles from the SNPS (page 1 4.2-1, line 5), which means that they are all I approximately 30 miles from the boundary of l
the plume exposure EPZ. In addition, all three reception centers are located southwest of the SNPS. The distance and direction from I the plant are similar to those of the previously designated reception center, the l Nassau Colesium.
1 ?
In the review of plans, FEMA uses NUREG-0654 element J.10ch to evaluate the acceptability of the location of reception centers. !
Reception centers are to be at least 5 miles and preferably 10 miles from'the boundary of the 10-mile EPZ (15 and 20 miles from the i plant site). Beyond 20 miles some consideration must be given to the delay :
which might result from increased travel time. However, the delay will not typically result in a medically significant increase in exposure. Reception centers in the 20 mile range are preferable in order to reduce the potential for the need to relocate the center in the event of a worse case incident.
A survey of reception centers and their distances from the EPZ' boundary at other nuclear power plant sites indicates that there are numerous reception centers designated for other nuclear power plants at distances comparable to those identified for l Shoreham (see S. Glass letter dated February 12, 1985 to M. Miller, copies to the service list).
I L
i
~
,N
- s, j.'
'l
-14 1
i -
REMAND ISSUE E (Continued),
. During the earlier stages;of these-proceedings,,' FEMA did not find'that the distance to.,the then' designated. reception . ,
center was unacceptable',.notwithstanding.the ;
desirability of having a suitable facility (s).
-closer'to.the EPZ boundary. Since:the.three newlyLdesignated~ reception centers are approximately the.same distance from the EPZ
.l boundary as the previous reception center;- ;
there is no reason to find that these new reception' centers are unacceptable due to=
)
l distance from the EPZ. y l.
.I e
~ _ _ . -- _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ - . . _ . . . _ . - _ _
- BOARD ISSUE 1 ISSUE: The evacuation routes to, and in the vicinity
- of, the proposed reception. centers'will cause unacceptable traffic congestion.
ANSWER: FEMA has no position on this issue. NRC will sponsor a witness to address this issue.
i i
1
N BOARD ISSUE 3 ISSUE: The staffing requirements for the new system
- of three reception centers have not been adequately addressed.
ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan (OPIP 4.3.2 Attachment 2) lists the. number of staff that will be assigned to the three general public '
reception centers. Attachments 3 - 5, of the same procedure, show a map of the locations of the assignments of the various staff. In l addition to the monitoring teams shown on the I layouts for each reception center, there are 12 additio'nal monitors assigned to the Hicksville center to monitor evacuees arriving by bus. !
The RAC review of Revision 8 of the LILCO plan found that element J.12 of NUREG 0654 was inadequate, partly because of the procedure proposed for monitoring arriving vehicles and their drivers. The process of evaluating the number of personnel required l to perform the proposed procedures would !
therefore appear to be fruitless.
It should be noted that based on the proposed procedures for monitoring bus evacuees, essentially the same procedure which was included in previous versions of'the plan and found to be acceptable, the number of ;
monitors assigned does not meet the 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> provision of NUREG 0654 element J.12, as explained below. Tha number of evacuees l arriving at a reception center for monitoring is still under discussion and.is the subject of an appeal to ALAB-855. The outcome of that appeal has nothing to do with the number of trained personnel needed to monitor bus I evacuees for the following reasons: (1) The l current version of the plan states that all l evacuees using LERO supplied buses as evacuation. vehicles will be transported to the Hicksville reception center for i monitoring. (2) The plan also states that the l
buses will be directed to the entrance of the operations building where the monitoring will occur inside the main lobby (this area is separate from the monitoring areas designated for evacuees arriving in personal vehicles).
l
____-__________-__w
5 BOARD ISSUE 3 (Continued)
- (3) The planning basis in Appendix A page III-35 states that 8% of the year round population in residence do not have cars and could, therefore, require bus. transportation for an evacuation.
If the assumption is made that the use of the average population is reasonable,, 8% of the 138,500 winter residents could need bus transportation and would therefore be driven to the Hicksville reception center for monitoring. 'This figure of 11,080 evacuees would need to be monitored within about 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> regardless of the percentage of the Eeneral population arriving at reception centers for which monitoring plans must eventually be made. Using the 90'second monitoring time per evacuee contained in'OPIP 3.9.2 Section 5.4.7.c, the 12 monitors assigned to the bus evacuee monitoring area could monitor 5760 evacuees in the 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ,
period. If the additional time required for thyroid monitoring as called for in OPIP 3,9.2 Section 5.10 is added, the short fell in monitoring personnel is even greater.
x i
BOARD ISSUE _A ISSUE: The proposal to transport all evacuees, using' LERO buses for evacuation, to the Hicksville reception center is not acceptable since this facility has been designated as a relocation center 'for emergency workers and their families.
ANSWER: Revision 8 of the LILCO plan designates the.
Hicksville Operation Office as a Relocation Center (OPIP 4.6.1). However, on evaluation l
of the substance of the procedure, it is l ,
clear that this facility is intended as a enngregate care center for LERO workers and/or their families (see.Section 5.1.13).
It should be noted that the referenced section of the procedure has not been updated and still carries the superseded general population reception center designation' within the body of the Section.
From the diagrams within OPIP 4.6.1 and the discussion in OPIP 4.2.3 Section 5.6, FEMA concludes that the bus evacuees are registered, monitored, and decontaminated if necessary in area.9 separate from the areas used by the LERO workers and/or families. It is FEMA's position, that based on a review of j the pertinent portions of the plan, there is j nothing inherently unacceptable with the proposed method of handling bus evacuees.
However, it should be noted that the-RAC review of Revision 8 of the LILCO. plan, states that the adequacy of the three new reception centers would have to be evaluated !
in a future exercise. Such an evaluation would involve visual inspection of the facility, completely set up as a reception center, for a general verification against the plan description, w__________________-
~1 r
- BOARD ISSUE 7 b q
~
ISSUE: The proposed method:of. monitoring the general-
- public; evacuees in.the-parking lots.of the three receptioncenters can not be implemented in a'way to. adequately-protect the public health and safety.
. ANSWER: 'As= stated'in the FEMA response to' BOARD ~ ISSUE 3, the RAC review of. Revision 8 of the LILCO.
Plan found NUREG element J.12.toLbe :
l inadequate, in part because of.the, proposed method of monitoring the. evacuees. arriving by.
. personal vehicle. The' evacuees l arriving.by 1 personal vehicles are the concerns-of this issue.
Monitoring the evacuees in their vehicles in-the parking lots does'not enable the monitors to perform a' complete '" frisking" of the evacuees. Revision 8 of the plan calls for:
only moni.toring:the hands and the area around.
the drivers feet. Evenfif the monitoring . ,
personnel were to attempt to monitor all'of the passengers, there would.be areas l'.e.,
backs of legs, backs, etc., which could.not. ;
be monitored adequately while the evacuees i are in their vehicles. It should be'noted that for-the case where evacuees become contaminated by immersion in the plume,.
localized contamination is not'likely. Where J contamination is picked up from contact with' i previously contaminated items, the possibility of localized contamination is ]
.more probable. It is not likely that medically significant contamination would be picked up by this later case, j l
I l
(
Ib.py_W , _Jhm_ar l
A native of Central New Jersey, Mr. Husar entered the emergency I preparedness field in April 1979, after working seven years in security and intelligence for DoD, when hired by the Defense Civil Preparedness Agency, New York field office. Serving as a field representative, he was responsible for providing emergency preparedness financial and technical assistance to New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
Mr. Husar has been employed by FEMA since its establishment and ,
has served the New York Regional Office in many capacities. He l was Chairman, Regional Assistance Committee (RAC) for state / local response planning surrounding nuclear power plants.
He was Acting Division Chief. Plans and Preparedness, and has responded to Residentially declared disasters throughout Region II. Mr. Husar performed a support role in the Love Canal emergency, as well as Puerto Rico and New York State hurricane disasters.
Until the position was abolished in June 1986, Mr. Husar was Branch Chief, National Preparedness Programs. He was directly responsible for the management of Government Preparedness (Special Access Programs) and National Preparedness Programs in 1 the region. He was Executive' Secretary, Regional Preparedness >
Committee (RPC) and was responsible for the Regional Emergency -
Response Team (RERT) plan development. He also served as Regional Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) Program Coordinator.
Currently, Mr. Husar is Supervisory Natural & Technological !
Hazards Programs Specialist, in the Natural & Technological l Hazards Programs Division (NTH). As a result of an Agency Reduction in Force (RIF) Mr. Husar was reassigned to this position and was selected by the Acting Regional Director to i serve again as RAC Chairman. Mr. Husar is currently responsible l for the day to day oversight of National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in the region as well as technological hazards programs.
The latter program area includes off-site safety surrounding commercial nuc' lear power plants and response planning for peace i time radiological accidents (including nuclear weapons accidents) and hasardous materials. In addition, he has retained responsibility for the Regional Emergency Response Team (RERT)
Plan.
Mr. Husar graduated from Rider College, Lawrenceville, NJ in 1967 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Secondary Education (History).
He has completed pre-candidate work for a Masters in Business Administration degree with Southern Illinois University.
1
In 1984. Mr. Husar was nominated for and completed Executive Management training at the Executive Seminar Center. Kings Point.
. NY. He has been the recipient of several awards during his career in the Federal government.
Mr. Husar is a Vietnam veteran, having served four years on active duty as an Army Intelligence Officer. He is currently a Lieutenant Colonel in the US Army Reserves.
He presently resides in Marlboro. New Jersey and married 18 years, and is the father of six children.
)
l i
l
l I
THOMAS E. BALDWIN 4
Environmental Systems Engineer Energy and Environmental Systems Division (EES) !
/
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) l Garden City, New York I
l Education Background l
Ph.D. 1973, Human Ecology and Demography, University of Cincinnati l M.A. 1969, Sociology and Human Ecology, University of Cincinnati l B.S. 1967, Sociology and Biology, Missouri Valley College I 1
1 Professional Experience J 1983-present Environmental Systems Engineer, EES, ANL, Garden City, j New York j As Northeastern Regional Manager for support services provided by ANL under 1 contract to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEM A), Dr. Baldwin is
- g. responsible for the scheduling and management of services furnished to the FEMA's Region I and II offices in Boston and New York City. He is exp,e rienced in reviewing )
4 state and local radiological emergency response plans and evaluating their capabilities to i protect populations living in the emergency planning zones surrounding commercial l nuclear power plants. Dr. Baldwin frequently served as a Federal observer and team 1
leader at off-site radiological emergency preparedness exercises. He is responsible for i the preparation and technical review of post exercise assessment reports detailing the l results of these exercises.
1982-1983 Senior Demographer / Economist, Energy and Environmental Analysts, Inc. (EEA), Environmental Consultants, Garden City, New York Responsible for analyzing the demographic, economic and social aspects of energy and industrial projects. Consultant to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, New York Public Development Corporation and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner and Smith, Inc., in assessing the economic feasibility of a satellite telecommunications facility for New York. Consultant to Argonne National Laboratory, in the review of state and local off-site radiological emergency response plans for commercial nuclear power plants in New England, New York, and New Jersey. Responsible for expanding EEA's base of clients who require assessments of economic return and the socioeconomic impacts associated with metropolitan development projects.
g,, THOMAS E. BALDWIN . 2 Professional Experience (Cont'd) 1981-1982 Manager of Economics, Dravo - Van Houten, . Inc. . (DVH),
Consulting Engineers, New York, New York Energy Economics -- Managed marketing and project evaluation analyses of the oil and gas industry leading to corporate investment decisions. These ' studies were <
prepared both for internal use by Dravo Corporation and for clients of DVH. !
Industrial Development Economics -
Developed proposals for the i financial / economic feasibility of marine engineering projects that ranged in size from limited, privately financed projects to large foreign regional development programs.
Reviewed and evaluated cargo forecasts and projections of regional economic growth used to obtain World Bank financing for container and bulk handling facilities proposed for the Port of Montevideo, Uruguay. Analyzed fortcasts of the economic return from agro-industrial facilities proposed for the Port of Conakry, Guinea.
1979-1980 Senior Economist, PRC Harris, Inc., Consulting Engineers, Lake Success, New York Energy and Environmental Studies - Analyzed the demand for low pressure gas reserves in rural upstate New York based on demographic trends and economic forecasts of future residential, commercial and industrial growth. Conducted the cost-benefit analysis of erosion protection measures for the U.S. Corps of Engineers project to.
protect commercial and residential developments along the Indian River Inlet in j Delaware. Evaluated eicisting socioeconomic impact models for use by the Corps of l Engineers Passaic River ' Basin Study Group. Analyzed the economic benefits of improving the channel to accommodate larger fishing vessels in the Woodeleft Canal at Freeport, Long Island.
Industrial Development Economics -- Project Manager for Terminal Construction Corporation's site / financial feasibility study for the development of a wholesale food distribution center in the Hackensack Meadowlands, New Jersey. Directed regional planning and socioeconomic analysis of growth related to the proposed development of a large agro-industrial port planned for Damletta, Egypt. Technical responsibilities to these studies included the determination of optimal' phasing and evaluating the economic return on investment from the proposed projects.
1972-1979 Social Economist, EES, ANL, Chicago, Illinois Socioeconomic Impact Assessments - Responsible for demographic, economic ,
and sociological analyses undertaken as part of a variety of research projects sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). These studies examined the socioec'onomic impacts of changes in employment, population size and demographic composition that are associated with the construction and operation of large-scale energy projects.
( , TiiOMAS E. BALDWIN 3 Professional Experience (Cont'd) ,
Responsibilities required in-depth experience with regional economic and demographic project techniques, including export-base, input-output, and cohort survival methods.
The construction of social surveys, use of population sampling methods, multivariate-regression techniques and statistical analysis of population composition were also an integral part of this work.
LDC Energy Assessments - . Developed the socioeconomic component of. Argonne j National Laboratory's role in the international Energy Development Program sponsored l by DOE. Prepared detailed, country-specific energy assessments for a number of l countries. Specific responsibilities included the identification of socioeconomic issues j l and problems, policy analysis, the development of research methodologies and interaction !
with foreign representatives. Experience with the application of econometric models to planned and subsidized economies. Knowledge of specific econometric methods for estimating fuel-specific energy demand as a function of price elasticities was also used in this research.
Environmental Pollution Damages --
Joint Argonne National Laboratory /
University of Chicago, Department of Economics project sponsored by the National 4 I
, Science Foundation (NSF) to analyze relationships between environmental pollution and the regional economy. Several studies were completed. These included: a survey of J l Chicago coal users to determine the costs of conversion to other fuels, an inventory of l building materials to estimate the costs of solling due to air pollution, and a multivariate regression residuals analysis that displays the geographic distribution of relationships ,
I between socioeconomic characteristics of the population and air quality in the Chicago SMSA. Experience developed in the course of these studies included survey construction and sampling, economic cost-benefit analysis, and the use of air quality display models.
Proi%ssional Society Activities American Association for the Advancement of Science American Sociological Association !
Population Association of America Publications: Journal Articles and Book Contributions Stenehjem, E.J., and T.E. Baldwin, A Framework for Detailed Site-Specific Studies of Local Socioeconomic Impacts from Energy Development. In Progress in Socioeconomic:
1977, E. Allen and A. Crawford, eds., Ann Arbor Science Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan (1977).
w_-----.--------------.-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
/
' THOMAS E. BALDWIN . 4 Publications. Tecl"tical Reports Nagle, J. and R. Whitfield, Indian Point Nuclear Power Station: Verification Analysis of :
County Radiological . Emergency Response Plans, Argonne National Report, ANL/EES-TM-229 (May 1983). T.E. Baldwin was responsible for the management and technical review of this report.
Baldwin, T.E., et al., Economic and Demographic Issues Related to Deployment of the Satellite Power System ANL/EES-TM-23 (October 1978).
Baldwin, T.E. and Roberta Poetsch, An Approach to Assessing Local Sociocultural f impacts Using Projections of Population - Growth and Composition, ANL/EES-TM-24 .
(August 1977).
Baldwin, T.E., et al., A Framework for Detailed Site-Specific Studies of Local Socioeconomic impacts from Energy Development, ANL/EES-TM-8 (December 1976).
Baldwin, T.E., A Socioeconomic Assessment of Energy Development in a Small Rural County: Coal Gasification in Mercer County, North Dakota, ANL/AA-5 (August 1976).
\ Baldwin T.E., et al., Allocating Projected Emissions to Subcounty A,reas,. Vol.13 of' Guidelines for Air Quality Maintenance Planning and Analysis: U.S. EP A Report' EP A-450-4-74-014 (November 1974).
Kennedy, A.S., et al., Air Pollution / Land Use Planning Project: Phase il Final Report, Vo'I.1-3, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report EPA-450/3-74-028 A, B, C (May 1974).
]
Norco, J.E., R.R. Cirillo, T.E. Baldwin, and J.W. Gudenas, An Air Pollution Impact Methodology for Airports and Attendant Land Use, ANL/ES-22 (January 1973).
Publications: Conference Papers (speaker's name is underlined)
Baldwin, T.E., Commercial Nuclear Power: Emergency Plans, the Regulators and the Public, paper presented to the New York Chapter of the American Institute of Chemists (September 18, 1985). ,
Stenehjem, E.J., T.E. Baldwin, and J.E. Metzger, Local Socioeconomic Impacts of Coal Development in the Midwest, Paper 12.2, Proc. 5th National Conference on Energy and the Environment, Cincinnati (October 1977).
' Baldwin T.E., J.C. Bosch, Jr., and R.R. Cirillo, Projecting Regional Air Pollution Using Traditional Planning Variables, Proceedings of the APCA Spe^cialty Conference: "Long-Term Maintenance of Clean Air Standards"(February 3,1975).
4 TIIOMAS E. BALDWIN 5 Publications: Conference Papers (speaker's name is underlined) (Cont'd)
Baldwin, T.E., Objectives and Decisions: How Do We Draw the Lines?, Paper presented at the Regional Seminar on Land Use Issues sponsored by the Bi-State Metropolitan Commission, Geneseo, Illinois (January 15, 1975).
Baldwin, T.E., Community Structure and the Adaptation of Municipal Finance, paper presented at Vill World Congress of the International Sociological Association, Toronto, Ontario (August 26, 1974).
Kennedy, A.S. and T.E. Baldwin, The Feasibility of Predicting Point Source Emissions Using Industrial Land Use Variables: A Path Analysis, Paper 74-145, Proc. 67th Annual '
Air Pollution Control Association Meeting, Denver (June 1974).
Kennedy, A.S., and T.E. Baldwin, Clean Air Through Urban and Regional Planning, I Proceedings of the Third International Clean Air Congress, Dusseldorff, Germany {
(October 1973). 1 Croke, K.G., A.S. Kennedy, and T.E. Baldwin, Research Problems and Issues in the Application of Land Use Controls to Environmental Protection, Proc. Interagency Cong.
L on the Environment, ' Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, U.S.- AEC Report CONF-721002, pp.153-157.
1 Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) ,
Baldwin, T.E., E. Tanzman, A. Smith, W. Gasper, P. Becherman, K. Lerner, Post Exercise Assessment, February 13, 1986, Exercise of the Local Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan, LILCO Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station at Shoreham, New York, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (Draf t; March 7, 1986).
Gasper, W., T.E. Baldwin, A. Smith, Post Exercise Assessment, November 13, 1985, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the State of New York and Oswego County for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station at Seriba, Oswego County, New York, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region !! (Draft; January 10, 1985). i Gasper, W., T.E. Baldwin, Y. Klein, A. Smith, Post Exercise Assessment, September 26, 1
1985, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the State of New York, Monroe County and Wayne County for the Robert E. Ginna Nuclear Power Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (December 16, 1985).
\
( w.
THOMAS E. BALDWIN . 6 u-Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) (Cont'd) l l
Baldwin, T.E., G. Kaszynski, F. Kay, Post Exercise Assessment, June 5,1985, Exercise of l the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, Ocean County and Ocean County Municipalities for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11(August 22, 1985). {
j i
Rospenda R., T.E. Baldwin, Post Exercise Assessment, April 23,1985 Remedial Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans for the State of New Jersey, Salem County and Six Localities for Public Service Electric and Gas Company's Salem Nuclear Generating Station Hancocks Bridge, Salem County, New Jersey, Federal Emergency ,
Management Agency, Region !! (June 19, 1985). j l
Baldwin, T.E., Revie'w of the Massachusetts Radiological Emergency Response Plan for l the Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant, revision dated October 1984, Federal }
Emergency Management Agency, Region I(June 18, 1985).
Baldwin, T,E., A. Smith, Post Exercise Assessment, April 10,1985, Remedial Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of New York State and Westchester, Rockland, Orange and Putnam Counties for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station,
\
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11 (May 10,1985). .
Baldwin, T.E., Review of the New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan for the Seabrook Station Nuclear Power Plant, revision dated December 1984, Federal j Emergency Management Agency, Region I (March 26, 1985).
Baldwin, T. E. , P. Becherman, S. Curtis, W. Gasper, R. Rospenda, Post Exercise )
Assessment, November 28, 1984, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness l Plans of New York State and Westchester, Rockland, Orange and Putnam Counties for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region
!!(February 27, 1985).
Rospenda, R., T.E. Baldwin, S. Curtis, Post Exercise Assessment, October 23, 1984, ,
Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, l Salem County and Six Localities, and Cumberland County and Two Localities for Public Service Electric and Gas Company's Salem Nuclear Generating Station: Hancocks Bridge, Salem County, New Jersey; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (February 19, 1985).
Baldwin, T.E., Review and Analysis of Population Estimates for the Boothbay Harbor Region, Maine for the Maine Yankee Nuclear Power Plant, Wiscasset, Maine; Federal Emergency Management Agency Region 1 (January 7,1985).
N Baldwin, T.E., Review of the LILCO Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Rev.1; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region !! (September 7,1984).
I
I J
l l
1 fl , TIIOMAS E. BALDWIN 7 Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) (Cont'd)
Levenson, J., A. Smith, S. Curtis, and Y. Klein, Post Exercise Assessment, October 26, 1983. Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, Salem County and Six Localities, and Cumberland County and Two Localities for Public Service Electric and Gas Company's Salem Nuclear Generating Station near Penns Grove, Salem County, New Jersey; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region !!
(February 6,1984). .
l Smith, A., T.E. Baldwin, J. Levenson, and J. Opelka, Post Exercise ' Assessment.
September 28, 1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the l State of New York and Oswego County for Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation's Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station at Scriba, Oswego County, New York; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II, (December 23, 1983).
Baldwin, T.E., Review of the LILCO Transition Plan for the Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Rev. 4, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11 (November 4,1983).
l South, A., Y. Klein, T.E. Baldwin, and P. Becherman, Post Exercise Assessment, August
^
(' ,, , 24-25, 1983, Exercise ' of the St' ate of New York Radiological Emergency Response
~. Interim Plan for Implementing Compensating Measures for Rockland County for the .
Indian Point Nuclear Power Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region'Il (September 26, 1983).
Klein, Y., A. Smith, T.E. Baldwin, and J. Tatar, Post Exercise Assessment, May 24,1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, Ocean County and Ocean County Municipalities for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating .
Station: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(September 16, 1983). f I
Klein, Y. and T.E. Baldwin, Post Drill Assessment, August 23,1983, Federal Emergency i Management Agency Observed Drill of the Westchester County Bus Evacuation I Procedures for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (September 15, 1983).
Smith, A., T.E. Baldwin, and Y. Klein, Post Exercise Assessment, June 22,1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Preparedness Plans of the State of New York, Monroe i County, and Wayne County for the Robert E. Ginna Nuclear Power Station; Federal i l Emergency Management Agency, Region II (August 30 and October 12, 1983). l l
l Klein, Y. and T.E. Baldwin, Post Exercise Assessment, May 24, 1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the State of New Jersey, Ocean County and i Ocean County Municipciities for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II (August 5,1983).
i J
i l TIIOMAS E. BALDWIN 8 Internal Reports to Sponsors (unpublished) (Cont'd)
Baldwin, T.E., Y. Klein, et al., Post Exercise Assessment, March 9,1983, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of New York State and Westchester, Rockland, Orange and Putnam Counties for the Indian Point Nuclear Power Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region II(April 14, 1983).
Barisas, S., K. Lerner, C. Saricks, T. Baldwin, J. Opelka, D. Hulet, Review of the Orange, Putnam and Westchester County, New York Radiological Emergency Response Plans for the Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11 (April 6,1983).
Opelka, J., D. Poyer, and E. Levine, T. Baldwin, Post Exercise Assessment, Exercise of the Radiological Emergency Response Plans of the States of New Jersey and Delaware and County and Local Jurisdictions Affected by the Salem Nuclear Generating Station; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 11(FeLcuary 28, 1983).
Baldwin, T.E., and G. Kaszynski, Interim Findings, Joint State and Local Radiological Emergency Response Capabilities for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station,
. Vernon, Vermont; Federal Emergency Management . Agency, Region I (September 27, 1982). , ,
Baldwin, T.E., and G. Kaszynski, Final Exercise Report, February 18, 1982 Joint State ;
and Local Radiological Emergency Response Exercise for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, Vernon, Vermont; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I (August 23, 1982).
Baldwin, T.E., and G. Kaszynski, Final Exercise Report, February 6,1982, Joint State and ;
Local Radiological Emergency Response Exercise for the Connecticut Yankee Atomic l Power Station, Haddam Neck, Connecticut; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I (August 1982). j l
Baldwin, T.E., Review of the New Hampshire Radiological Emergency Response Plan; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I (June 1982). i Baldwin, T.E., Review of the Vermont Radiological Emergency Response Plan; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I(June 1982).
Baldwin, T.E., Outlook for Engineering Services in the Oil and Gas Market; Dravo Van l Houten, Consulting Engineers (June 1981). I Baldwin, T.E., A Qualitative Assessm ent of Economic Change in Queens County, New York; Citibank, N.A. (March 1981).
\
1 I '~ i THOMAS E. BALDWIN 9 Legal Testimony Testimony before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Atomic Safety and-Licensing Board in the Matter of Emergency Planning of Long Island Lighting-Company for the Shoreham. Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1, Docket No.
50-322-O L-3. Preparation of written testimony- April 17, 19841and August 7, 1984; Depositions June 29, and August 9,1984; Oral cross examination July 10-13 and August 14-16, 1984. ..
3E h
[ *
/,.,
s 1
c; S
- 4. .
JOSEPH H. N!IIER
- PICFESSICNAL QUALIFIC\TICNS
. Educatim:
Bachelor of Science in_d==4atry, Washington College,-
ChestertcWn, MD,.1956.
Master of Science in Irupic d==4atry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA,1958.
Graduate Assistant in d==4=try, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 1958-61.
Professional Positions: 1961-1966 Assistant Professor of h4=try at Idaho. State University, Pocatello, ID. Responsibilities included &aarMng courses in freshman d==4=try, quantative analysis, instrumental analysis, advanced inorganic h4=try and 1=he=ttery rad 4ev4==4=try.
gy 8/66 - 10/73
.n -
.b) . Engloyed at the Idaho National Engineering laboratory in Idaho Falls,.ID (then called the National Reactor Testing Station) .
She site is gov =4.4 it owned and administered by the Depa1.t.umust of Energy Research and Devel% ,t Agency. I was enployed by one of the operating m e ctors, initially Idaho Nuclear Corp.
followed by Allied d==4=1 Corp. My position was a technical one in the research and development area of fission product behavior and s vy.rties.
10/73 - 6/74 j i
Engloyed as raamarch scientist by Nuclear Envim dal Services division of SAI, Inc., Idaho Falls, ID. responsibilities included contract =.=~t en performance gaseous rad waste processing v 4 = =nt in a BWR and analysis of sources of inplant radiation exposure to workers.
6/74 - 12/78 Enployed as scientific and engineering supervisor by Allied d==4ml Cv1. pus.ation at the Idaho National Engineerirxf Iab.atury. Responsibilities included supervision of a research :
la6.atury involved with analysis of fissicn product levels in irradiated nuclear fuel v 4==ns and analysis of the fission f,s product ocntent of sanples of the worlds 1st known natural I. fission reactor and the supervision of an analysis laboratory for.
k./ envis.u a.al sanples. Otmducted m u.act research in suppod; of NRC.
- --__ _____=_____-_
A s .j 12/78 - present Employed as scientist by Allied h iral Corp., Exxon Nuclear Idaho Co., Inc., (after 7/3/79), ard Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear
. ccmpany, Inc. (after 3/1/84), at the Idaho National Engineering ;
Iaboratory. Respersibilities include research and devah--d.
contract support to NRC and FDR.
Attended FEMA crientatim trainig course en Radiological Eur.ipcy Preparedness Planning for DOE Contract Personnel. ;
Experience:
Prove existence of previously tuu.Wiized airborne radiciodine species to be hypoiodeus acid.
DevalW sampling device to differentiate various cham 4e-a_1 forms of aiit-Are radiciodine.
Developed inorganic *M-fit, to retain aiitard radiciodine.
Measured r3am'a fissicri prw+iv-ts in effluents and sucssa
, e streams in 5 IMR's stations.
/
Y Performed effluent and envi&w - ratal ma== w its to assess iodine-grass-cow-milk dose pathway at BWR's.
1 Made effluent and envi&wm udal measurements of radioicdine at a j pharmamt.ical plant to amaaam envisuu=uital impart. l Analyzed fuel specimens to detarmine accurately the fission ,
yields in the fast flux region of the neutron Waum. '
Analyzed fuel aparimans to eshh14ah breedity or conversion ratio in 'Ih-U fuels from the light water braarlar s w icua.
Developed a sampling device for airborne 14 C and3H in nuclear plant effluents and g w a streams.
Participated in envisummatal swiam to measure movement of radionuclides through suci:ss equipnent in PWR's so that the predictive models can be evaluated.
Responsible for technical evaluation of O- adal BNR off-gas systems.
Evaluated applicability of off-site, real-time instrumentation to determine the magnitude of unmanitored releases in accident situations.
\
s .
l
- _ n
? 2.,
Evaluated soil to vegetation transfer 'of stable cesium and ~
. mi ua.ium.
Reviewed current state of knowledge cri scavenging in the '
. envia. .t ain-_us radiciodine by rain or snow.
~
Testified as FDUL witness at Indian Point and Shoreham ASIB l hearing. l l Adjunct facility manhar at FD9L Lu-4.pcy ihe, A. Institute.
Publications:
J. H.1Galler, F. A. Duce, and F. O. Cartan, " Retention of Iodine cn Selected Par +4mlate Filters and a Percus Silver Membrana Being Considered for the IDFI' Maypeck", IN-1078, May 1967 W. J. Masck, D. T. Ponce, and J. H. IGaller, "A Highly Efficient Irku. pdc Adarw+=v for Ai@ _us Iodine Species -(Silver Zeolite)'
Devel% ,L Studies", IN-1224 October 1968 R. L. Nebeker, J. H.1Galler, L. T. Iakey, D. E. Black, .-
W. P. Palica, and R.- E. Schindler, "Omtainment Behavior of Xenon .
and Iodine Ubder Simulated Ioss-of-Coolant Amidarit omditionsi in ' !
the contamination-D=.ui h tien Experiment", IN-1394, June'1971- !
B. Weiss, P. . G. Voilleque, J. H.1Geller, B. Kahn, ' H. .L.
A. Martin, and C. R. Pb4114 ! =, " Detailed Measurements ofgger, I
in Air, Vegetation, and Milk Arcund 'Ihree Operating Reactor Sites", NURM-75/021, March 1975 W. J. Maeck, F. W. Spraktes, R. L. Troup, and J. H. Faller, l
" Analytical Results, P 6 Nuclear Constants and Suggested Correlations for the Evaluation of OKID Fission Product Data", at IAFA International Synposium en the Oklo Phenmenon, Liberville, Gabon, IAFA-SM-204/2, June 1975 W. J. Maeck, W. A. Emel, L. L. Dickerson, J. E. Delmore, ;
and R. L. Trtsp, " Dim .mmrc.ies and J. H. Keller, RegartlingE. A.2p,'Ibamal Pu Fissicri Yields 'and the Use of as a Burnup Manitor", ICP-1092, nn,,amhar 1975 N. D. Dyer, E. B. Na4 =r+=4dt, J. H.1Galler, and B. G. Notes, -
"PrMwns Source Term Measurement Pi.up.am", TREE-1178, October 1977 N. D. Dyer, J. H. Keller, R. L. Bunting, B. G. Notes, i S. T. Crm ey, D. W. Akers, C. V. McIsaac, T. E. Ctsc, ,
A R. L. Kynaston, S. W. Duce, D. R. Underwood, J. W. Tkachyk, Ua ' "In-Plant Source '1hrm Measurements at Ft. m1Mwi :
'O Station-Uhit 1", NURM/CR-1040, . July 1978 I 1
'A 1 Ql J. L. W- - - --:9, S. W. Duca, ani J. H. Faller, "An AN--12 aric.
'.- Tritium arii Cadisi-14 Manitoring Systam", NUREG/CR-0386, September 1978 1
- N. C. Dyer, J. H. Kaller, R. L. Bunting, B. G.' Notes, S. T. Crtzisy, D. W. Akars, C. V. McIsaac, T. E. . Ocx, R. L. Kynasten, S. W. Duca, D. R.. Uhdarwood, J.' W.' Tkachyk, "In-Plant Source Term Measurements at Zicn Staticrt",- !
NUREG/CR-0715, February 1979 l J. J. Kaller, L. W.- McClure,' N. = Hoza, A. L. Ayers Jr. , -R. lo, and '
L. W. Barrett, " Boiling Water Reactor Off-gas Systems Evaluation", NUREG/CR-0727, Jtna .1979 R. W. Benedict, A. B. 01ristansen, J. A. Dal Debbio, J. N.'.Kaller, and D. A. Khacht,," Technical and Economic Fansibility of Zeolite Er- 5 ;'1ation for Krypten-85 Sta=;ir=", ENICD-10ll, September 1979.
J. H. Kaller, B. G. Motas,-D. W. Akers, T. E. Ccx,.S. W. Duca, and J. W. Tkachyk,. " Measurement of Xa-131, C-14 and Tritium in Air and I-131 Vegetation and Milk Around the Quad Cities Nuclear Power
' Station", NUREG/CR-1195, ENICD-1023, Mardi 1980
^
l 1
'y, J. W. Mandler, S. T. Croney, N. C. Dyer, C. V. Mr 1'anan,.
A. C. Stalkar, B. G. Notes, J. H. Kaller, T. E. Ocx, D. W. Akers, J. W. Tkachyk, and S. W. Duce, "In-Plant Source Term Measurements
- at Turkey Point Station - Units 3 and 4",' NUREG/CR-1629, )
SepFamhar 1980 P. G. Voilleque, B. Kahn, H. L. . Kraiger, D. M. Mar *&vy, J. H. Kaller, and B.'H. Weiss, g uation of the Air-Vegetation-Milk Pathway for I at the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Staticn", NUREG/CR-1600, November 1981 i W. J. Maeck, L. G. Hoffman, B. A. Staples, and J. H. Kaller, "An-naaaaamant of Offsite, Real-Time Dose Measurement Systems for Eunu.pcy Situations", NUREG/CP-2644, ENICD-1110, April' 1982 ' i L. G. Hoffman and J. H. Keller, " Characterization of Soil to Plant Transfer coefficients for Stable Casium and SLwt.ium",
NUREG/CR-2495, ENICD-1105, June 1982 P. G. Voilleque, L. G. Hoffman, and J. H. Kaller, " Wet Deposition Pr-aaa for Radioicdinas", NUREG/CR-2438, ENICD-1111, August 1982 B. J. Salmonsal, L. G. Hoffman, R. J. Hankus, and J. H. Keller, "Giridance cm offsite Ermu.pcy Radiation Measurement Systems -
Phase 2 - Milk Pathway", WINCO-1009, April 1984 9
,~, .
(I W. J. Maack, R. J. Mcz1kus, J. H. . Faller,l and P. G. Voilleque,
" laboratory Measurements of Parameters affecting Wet Deposition of ;j Methyl Ier1W", NUREG/CR-4041, WINCD-1023, Seg$mmhar 1984
~
B. J. Salacsism, L. G. Hoffman, R. J. Hmkus, and J. H. Keller,
" Guidance cri Offsite E- .w c y Radiatim Maame Systems -
Phase 3 - Water and Non-Dairy Food Pathway", WIN 00-1012, October 1984 ,
B. J. Salamsen, R. J. Hcalkus, 'and J. H. Kaller, " Guidance' on Offsite Emergency Radiatical Maannument Systems - Itase 1 -
Ali+ , 3s Release", FDIA-REP-2_ (Rev.1) , WIN 00-1029, hv 1985 '
)
Papers:
F. O. Cartan, H. R. Beard, F. A. Duce, and J.~ N. Kaller, " Evidence for the Existance of Hypoldous Acid as a Volatile Iodine Species PMv=r4 in Water Air Mixtures at Tenth AEC Air Cleanim Conference, _ New York, NY, August 1968, . CCEF. 680821 J..H. Kaller, F. A. Duce, D. T. Ponce, and W. J. Maack, "Hypoidous Acid: An Ahtme Ihu. pdc Iodine Wiaa in Steam-Air Mixtures at Eleventh AEC Air Cleanirn Ccnf .-i4,'Richland, E, Segfanhar 1970, (IMF 700816 J. H. Kaller, F. ' A. Duce, and W. J. Maack, "A Selective' Adsorbent Sanqpling for DifferentiatincJ Aht-A34 Iodine Species at Eleventh AEC Air cleanim conference, Richland, MA, Seg# amber 1970, CIEF 700816 J. H. Kaller, T. R. 'Ihcznas, D. T. Ponce, and W. . J. Maeck, . "An Evaluation of Matarials and 'IWiniques Used' for Manitoring ;
Air-Borne I<adiciodine Species at 'Nelfth AEC Air Cleanirn '
Conference, Oak Ridge, 'IN, August.1972, CCNF 720823 J. H. Faller, T. R. 'Ihcanas, D. T. Ponce, W. J. Maeck, " Iodine d==4 =try in Steam Air Ah- 5'- - at *Fifth Annnal Han1th Physics Society Midvaar Synoosium, Idaho Falls, ID, November 1970- i i
J. H. Kaller, L. L. Dickerscn, F. W. Spartkes, and W. J. Maeck, .
Detarm hation of the Natural Abundance of Krypton in the i Ah-5-iare at Am. Cham. Soc. Nuclear Chemistry and 'hchnoloav Division Meetins, Newport Beach, CA,_ February 1973 J. H. Kallar, " Iodine Species Measurements", invited paper at.
Nuclear Safety Analysis Center E.ui--l = cn Ierike Rel=====' in Reactor Accidents, Palo Alto, CA, Novamhar 1980 gG.VoillequeandJ.H.Keller," Air-to-VegetationTransportof I as Hypoiodous Acid", Health Physics 40, p 91-94, 1981
( _p
- - - _ - - . - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - , . - - - . . - - - ---u . - - - -
\ y'i ,
s..>
J. .H. Faller and L. G.. Hoffman, " Proposed Federal Guidance on ,
he f Mcrtitoring a in the Milk Pathay", at 13th Annual National Ccmference en Radiation Otmtzol, Little Rock, AK, May 1981 J. H. Faller, . "Updata on PM4miM4w Mcmitoring", at the 14th Annual National O:mference mi Radiation Ctztrol, Portland, .MA, May 1982 J. H. Faller, " Iodine Sanpling-Under he cf Canditions",
invited paper at IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium, Orlando,.FL,-
November 1984
{
-i
'1 7.
1 i
I i
l (m. .
1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )
) Docket No. 50-322-OL-3 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY )
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, )
Unit 1) )
l CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " FEMA PREFILED TESTIMONY" in the above-captioned proceedings have been served on the following by deposit in the United States mail, first class, this 10th day of April, 1987:
John H. Frye, III (Courtesy Copy) Fabian G. Palomino, Esq.
Administrative Judge Special Counsel to the Governor Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Executive Chamber U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State Capitol Washington, D.C. 20555 Albany, NY 12224 Oscar H. Paris (Courtesy Copy) W. Taylor Reveley III, Esq.
Administrative Judge Hunton & Williams Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 707 East Main Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 1535 Washington, D.C. 20555 Richmond, VA 23212 i l
Frederick J. Shon Jonathan D. Feinberg, Esq. l Administrative Judge New York State Department of '
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Public Service U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Three Empire State Plaza )
Washington, D.C. 20555 Albany, NY 12223 1
I
~ 2-Morton 'B. Margulies,--Chairman Dr. Jerry R. Kline . .
d' Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S Nucle'ar Regulatory Commission i East-West Towers, 'tm 430 . East-West Towers, Rm. 430 4350 East-West Hwy. 4350 East-West' Hwy; Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Bethesda, MD 20814 Stephen'B. Latham, Esq.
John F. Shea,.III, Esq. Christopher'M. McMurray, Esq. j
~
Twomey, Latham & Shea Lawrence Coe:Lanpher', Esq.
Attorneys at Law David T. Case, Esq.
P.O. Box 398- Kirkpatrick & Lockhart 33 West Second Street 1800 M Street, N.W.
Riverhead, NY 11901 9th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Joel Blun, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director, Utility-Intervention Washington, D.C. 20555 NY State Consumer Protection-Board Suite 1020:
Atomic Safety and Licensing 99 Washington Avenue Appeal Board Panel ,
Albany, NY. 12210 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Monroe Schneider .
North Shore Committee P.O. Box 231 Docketing and Service Section Wading River, NY 11792 ,
Office of the Secretary J U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Philip H. McIntire 1 Washington, D.C. 20555 Federal Emergency Mana'gement Agency )
26 Federal Plaza J Spence Perry, Esq.** New York, New York 10278 4 General Counsel, Rm. 840 Federal Emergency Management Agency 500 C Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20472 Robert Abrams, Esq.
Attorney General of the State ;
Mary M. Gundrum, Esq.. of New York i New York State Dept. of Law Attn: Peter Blenstock, Esq.
120 Broadway Department of Law l 3rd Floor, Room 3-116 New York, N.Y Two World Trade Center 4 10271 Room 46-14 New York, NY 10047 Anthony F. Earley, Jr., Esq. M B Technical Associates General Counsel 1724 lkmilton Avenue Long Island Lighting Company Suite K 250 Old County Road San Jose, CA 95125 Mineola NY 11501 k
7
.)
-o County Executive Martin Bradley Ashare', Esq.
Suffolk County Executive .
Suffolk County Attorney.; ]
County Executive / Legislative Bldg. 'H. Lee Dennison Building .i
- Veteran's Memorial Highway . Veteran's' Memorial Highway 1
. .J
' Hauppauge,'NY. 11788 .Hauppauge, NY 11788- 1 Mr. Jay Dunklebeiy;ir. Ms. Nora Bredes New York State Energy Office Shoreham Opponents Coalition 1 Agency Building 2' 195 East: Main Street Empire State Plaza Smithtown, NY 11787 l i Albany, New York 12223' Ellen Blackler Mr.' Robert Hoffmnan New York State Assembly' Ms. Susan Rosenfeld '
Energy. Committee Ms. Sharlene Sherwin' 626 Legislative Office Building P.O. Box,1355 Albany, NY 12248 Massapequa, NY 11758
Brookhaven Town Attorney Richard Bachman, Esq 475 E. Main Street U.S Nuclear Regulatory Agency Patchogue, NY 11772 7735 Old Georgetown Road:
Bethesda,~MD 20814
! b ,4sf.44~ ~
W1111am R. Cumming- / 1 Federal Emergency Management (gency.
l j
l h
- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ - _ _ _ - _ - __--- _