ML20217C465
| ML20217C465 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood |
| Issue date: | 09/17/1997 |
| From: | Grant G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Tulon T COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20217C470 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-456-97-13, 50-457-97-13, NUDOCS 9710010410 | |
| Download: ML20217C465 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000456/1997013
Text
_ . _ . - . . - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ - . _ . . _
}XI
,
- .7
%i .
. pino
-
UNITED STATES
So . [
~
o,$-
NUCLEAR RE20LATORY COMMISSION -
- " +- O/
"
-
P.EGION m
ti
E
-801 WARRENVILLF. ROAD -
USLE, ILUNOtS 60632-4361 -
.....
September 17, 1997
Mr. T. Tulon
Site Vice President -
' Braidwood Station
Commonwealth Edison Company -
RR #1, Box 84
Braceville, IL 60407
SUBJECT:
NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-456/97013(DRP); 50-457/97013(DRP) AND
Dear Mr. Tulon:-
< On August 11,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Braidwood Units 1 and 2
- reactor facilities. The enclosed report presents the results of that inspection.
- During the 6 week inspection period, your conduct of activities was generally characterized-
by safety-conscious operations.~ Specifically, two maintenance activities performed on a-
feedwater isolation valve and on a main steam isolation valve were characterized by
~
excellent planning, execution, and team work.
We found that your root cause investigation performed in response to an over' dilution of the
'
Unit 1 reactor coolant system was accurate, thorough, and self critical. Additionally, the
,
rapid recognition and immediate corrective actions by operators limited the magnitude of the
transient and minimized the safety consequences of the event. However, we are concerned
about the lack of strict procedural adherence that your_ staff identified as a root cause for
the over dilution. Since the event was non-repetitive, self-identified,'and corrected, the
- procedural adherence violation is being treated as a non-cited violation.
We are also concerned that the inspectors found a welding machine unattended and
energized. This violation of the Technical Specification requirements to follow procedures -
_
,
.
that implement your fire protection program could have resulted in a serious fire hazard.' A
similar event at the LaSalle Station in March.1996 resulted in a fire. We do understand that
corrective action was taken with welders and fire watches to reinforce the seriousness of
<
- leaving the wolding machine energized and unattended. The violation is cited in the
. enclosed Notice of Violation (Notice), and the circumstances surrounding the violation are
described in detail in the enclosed report..
1
!
!
. . -
t
t
9710010410 970917
i
f
ADOCK 05000456
l
WMsMnqui
""
t
-..
<
%---
. - - - - -
,,
, _
,-m.,-
,-,,#
--.nw._,w,
,-.._ ,--
.-.m.-
.
- , -
,
.
- _ _ .
_
- _
_
'
.
l
,
.
T. Tulon
-2-
l
The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the above cited violation
and corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent rc:urrence is
already adequately addressed on the docket in Inspection Report No. 50-457/97013.
,
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does
not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position. In that case, or if you choose
i
to provide additionalinformation, you should follow the instructions specified in the
1
enclosed Notice.
in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
,
enclosures, and your responses to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document
Room.
Sincerely,
.
/s/ Marc L. Dapas for
,
Geoffrey E. Grant, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
J
Docket Nos: 50-456, 50-457
License Nos: NPF-72, NPF 77
Enclosures:
2. Inspection Report 50-456/97013(DRP);
50-457/97013(DRP)
P1 EASE RFF ATTACHED _CONCLIRRENCES
See Attachael Distribution
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enci "E"
= Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy
See attached concurences
OFFICE
Rlli
Rlli
Rlli
Rlli
NAME
Tongue /co
Shear / Orth
Creed /Belanger
Gardner/Schrum
Section R2.1
Section S 1.1
Section F1.1
DATE
9/
/97
9/
/97
9/
/97
9/
/97
,
unmanaammumusammmmmmm m muunmens
.- --
menumusumunummuummeummeumsmuununumusumammu
,
OFFICE
Rlli
Rlli
NAME
Lanksbury
Grant
1
DATE
9/
/97
9/
/97
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
-
-
-
-_. -
-
_
. _ .
.
.
T. Tulon
-2-
The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason fu, the above cited violation and
corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence is
already adequately addressed on the docket in inspection Report No. 50-457/97013. Therefore,
you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does not
accurately reflect your corrective actions oi your position, in that case, or if you choose to
provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed
Notice.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
enclosures, and your responses tc this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Sincerely,
Geoffrey E. Grant, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket Nos: 50-456, 50-457
j
Enclosures:
2. Inspection Report 50-456/97013(DRP);
50-457/97013(DRP)
See Attached Distribution
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enci "E" =
Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy
See attached concurences
OFFICE
Rlli
Rlli
Rlll
Elli
NAME
Tongue /co
Shear / Orth
Creed /Belanger
Gardner/Schrum
Section R2,1
Section S 1.1
Section F1.1
DATE
9/
/97
9/
/97
9/
/97
9/
/97
OFFICE
Rlli
Rlli
NAME
Lanksbury
Grant //
DATE
9/
/97
9//7/97
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
-
.
-
--. -
-
- -
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ - _ _ _ _
_
.
d
T. Tulen
-2-
The NRC has concluded that information regarding the reason for the above cited violation
and corrective actions taken and planned to correct the violation and prevent recurrence is
already adequately addressed on the docket in inspection Report No. 50-457/97013.
Therefore, you are not required to respond to this letter unless the description therein does
not accurately reflect your corrective actions or your position, in that case, or if ycu choose
to provide additional information, you should follow the instructions specified in the
enclosed Notice.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, the
enclosures, and your responses to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document
Room.
Sincerely,
/s/ M. L. Dapas for
Geoffrey E. Grant, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket Nos: 50-456, 50-457
Enclosures:
2. Inspection Report 50-456/97013(DRP);
50-457/97013(DRP)
Sea _Attachad Distributinn
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box "C" = Copy without attach /enci "E"
= Copy with attach /enci "N" = No copy
OFFICE
Rill
N
Rlli
N
Rll( , f, ,
b
Rlli
M
NAME
Tongue /c)~
gth
C
elanger
Gardner/Schrum
Shear / Orth
gaoP
Section R2.1
S
ion S 1.1
S
F1.1
Eh_E_94L_
9/997 _m
OFFICE
Rill
O
Rill
Lanksburk h
Grant
NAME
DATE
9/ lL/97
9/ /97
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
,
.
..
.
..
. .
- .
- .
- . . . - - . - .
. - _ - - . _ . . - - ~ . . - ..
. - -
. ~ . _ _
.
. - -
.,
4
- e
.
,
T. Tulon
-3
l
i.
1
l
cc w/ encl:
R. J. Manning,' Executive
- .
Vice President, Generation
M. Wallace, Senior Vice
j..
President, Corporate Services
'
.
H. G. Stanley, Vice President
PWR Operations
t
.
l-
D. A. Sager, Vice President,-
Generation Support
D. Farrar, Nuclear Regulatory
9
= Services Manager
i. Johnson, Ucensing
Operations Manager
4
)
Document Control Desk Ucensing
[
Braidwood Station Manager
T. Simpkin, Regulatory
l
Assurance Supervisor
Richard Hubbard
"
Nathan Schloss, Economist
j
Office of the Attor,ey General -
-
,
State Unison Officer
Chairman, Illinois Commerce
j
Commission
i
Dietrihutinn:
Docket File w/ encl
DRP w/enci '
OC/LFDCB w/enct
TSS w/enci
!
PUBLIC IE-01 w!enci-
DRS (2) w/enci
A. Beach w/enci
Rlil PRR w/ encl
,
Deputy RA w/enct
RAC1 (E-Mail)
i
Rlli Enf. Coord, w/enci
CAA1 (E-Mail)
- SRI Braidwood w/enci
DOCDESK (E-Mail)
.
Project Mgr., NRR w/enci
!
1
-
,
4i;
._
_
4'
4
i
l
'
_