Letter Sequence Approval |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20206A2321987-03-26026 March 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Correction to Basis of Tech Specs for Containment Cooling Project stage: Other ML20205T6951987-03-26026 March 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-40,correcting Basis of Tech Specs for Containment Cooling Project stage: Request ML20205T6821987-03-26026 March 1987 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-40,correcting Tech Specs Re Containment Cooling.Fee Paid Project stage: Request ML20215A6381987-06-10010 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Bases to Tech Spec 2.4, Containment Cooling. Proposed Changes to Bases for Section 2.4 Serves to Editorially Change Error,Make Phrases & Statements More Accurate & Reflect Current Terminology Project stage: Approval ML20215A6281987-06-10010 June 1987 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Bases to Tech Spec 2.4, Containment Cooling. Proposed Changes Would Correct Bases of Amount of Heat That Can Be Removed by Three Component Cooling Water HXs Project stage: Approval 1987-03-26
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20217B5401999-10-0606 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 193 to License DPR-40 ML20211J9321999-09-0202 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Proposed Alternatives Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety. Proposed Alternatives Authorized for Remainder of Third ten- Yr ISI Interval for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20210G2181999-07-27027 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 192 to License DPR-40 ML20210D9951999-07-22022 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 191 to License DPR-40 ML20206L4241999-05-10010 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Corrective Actions to Ensure That Valves Are Capable of Performing Intended Safety Functions & OPPD Adequately Addressed Requested Actions Discussed in GL 95-07 ML20206M2601999-05-0606 May 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee IPEEE Complete Re Info Requested by Suppl 4 to GL 88-20 & IPEEE Results Reasonable Given FCS Design,Operation & History ML20205Q5831999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 190 to License DPR-40 ML20198S3771998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 189 to License DPR-40 ML20198S4831998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 188 to License DPR-40 ML20154M4881998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 186 to License DPR-40 ML20154N2411998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 187 to License DPR-40 ML20236V4891998-07-30030 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Relating to Response to GL 87-02,suppl 1 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20248C0671998-05-21021 May 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Licensee Request for Exemption from Technical Requirements of 10CFR50,App R, Fire Protection Program for Nuclear Power Facilities Operating Prior to 790101 ML20217L7201998-03-23023 March 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 185 to License DPR-40 ML20203M4161998-02-0303 February 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 184 to License DPR-40 ML20203A4291998-01-26026 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 183 to License DPR-40 ML20199L0711997-11-24024 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 182 to License DPR-40 ML20198Q4031997-10-28028 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Control Room Habitability Requirements ML20137L6241997-03-27027 March 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 181 to License DPR-40 ML20134N7751997-02-13013 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 180 to License DPR-40 ML20134M6171997-02-13013 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Request for Approval to Use ASME Section XI Code Case N-416-1 W/Proposed Exception & Code Case N-498-2 as Alternative to Required Hydrostatic Pressure Test ML20133P9161997-01-23023 January 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Revised Temperature Limits for DG-1 & DG-2 ML20133C2771996-12-30030 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 179 to License DPR-40 ML20132F4911996-12-0909 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Related to Individual Plant Evaluation Omaha Power District,Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20134M0871996-11-19019 November 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Request for Relief from Modifying Supports SIH-3,SIS-63,SIS-65 & RCH-13 at Fort Calhoun Station ML20129H3371996-10-25025 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 178 to License DPR-40 ML20128F6441996-10-0202 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 177 to License DPR-40 ML20129G3131996-09-27027 September 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 176 to License DPR-40 ML20059J1831994-01-14014 January 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 160 to License DPR-40 ML20059J2491994-01-14014 January 1994 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 159 to License DPR-40 ML20058G9371993-12-0303 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 158 to License DPR-40 ML20058F5951993-11-22022 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 157 to License DPR-40 ML20058C7491993-11-18018 November 1993 Safety Evaluation,Authorizing Alternative,On One Time Basis Only,W/Conditions That Licensee Perform Volumetric Exam of nozzle-to-vessel Welds During First Refueling Outage of Third 10-yr Insp Interval ML20059L7081993-11-10010 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Proposed Changes to Low Power Physics Testing Program ML20059G6601993-10-29029 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 156 to License DPR-40 ML20057E3471993-10-0101 October 1993 Safety Evaluation Advising That Based on Determination That Alternative Testing Consistent w/OM-10,paragraph 4.3.2.2. Requirements,No Relief Required ML20056E5411993-08-12012 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 155 to License DPR-40 ML20056E5371993-08-10010 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 154 to License DPR-40 ML20056D6801993-07-26026 July 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 153 to License DPR-40 ML20128B8241993-01-26026 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 149 to License DPR-40 ML20128D4511992-11-30030 November 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Evaluation of 120-day Response to Suppl 1 to GL 87-02, Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical & Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue A-46 ML20062G6621990-11-19019 November 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 134 to License DPR-40 ML20216K0661990-11-14014 November 1990 Safety Evaluation Denying Util 900221 & 0622 Requests for Exemption from App R of 10CFR50 for Fire Area 34B,upper Electrical Penetration Room.Current Level of Fire Protection Does Not Meet Section III.G.2 Requirements ML20062B6161990-10-12012 October 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 133 to License DPR-40 ML20055G0221990-07-0606 July 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 132 to License DPR-40 ML20246A0741989-08-17017 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves ML20245H9031989-08-15015 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1), Equipment Classification (Reactor Trip Sys Components). Licensee Program Meets Requirements of Item 2.1 (Part 1) of Generic Ltr 83-28 & Acceptable ML20245K3481989-08-11011 August 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Electrical Isolation Devices for Interfacing Safety & Nonsafety Sys Re Implementation of ATWS Rule ML20247H6421989-07-24024 July 1989 Safety Evaluation Granting 890118 Request for Relief from Hydrostatic Testing Requirements of Section XI of ASME Code ML20248C0851989-06-0202 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 122 to License DPR-40 1999-09-02
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217B5401999-10-0606 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 193 to License DPR-40 ML20217A9931999-09-30030 September 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data LIC-99-0096, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With ML20211J9321999-09-0202 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Proposed Alternatives Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety. Proposed Alternatives Authorized for Remainder of Third ten- Yr ISI Interval for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 LIC-99-0084, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station.With ML20216E6431999-08-26026 August 1999 Rev 19 to TDB-VI, COLR for FCS Unit 1 ML20210R1961999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1 ML20210G2181999-07-27027 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 192 to License DPR-40 ML20210D9951999-07-22022 July 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 191 to License DPR-40 ML20216E6361999-07-21021 July 1999 Rev 18 to TDB-VI, COLR for FCS Unit 1 ML20210R2081999-06-30030 June 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1 LIC-99-0065, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20196H8621999-06-30030 June 1999 NRC Regulatory Assessment & Oversight Pilot Program, Performance Indicator Data, June 1999 Rept ML20210P5461999-06-0808 June 1999 Rev 0,Vols 1-5 of Fort Calhoun Station 1999 Emergency Preparedness Exercise Manual, to Be Conducted on 990810. Pages 2-20 & 2-40 in Vol 2 & Page 4-1 in Vol 4 of Incoming Submittal Not Included ML20195B4581999-05-31031 May 1999 Rev 3 to CE NPSD-683, Development of RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept for Removal of P-T Limits & LTOP Requirements from Ts ML20207H7401999-05-31031 May 1999 Performance Indicators Rept for May 1999 LIC-99-0053, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 11999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1 ML20195B4521999-05-17017 May 1999 Technical Data Book TDB-IX, RCS Pressure - Temp Limits Rept (Ptlr) ML20206L4241999-05-10010 May 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Corrective Actions to Ensure That Valves Are Capable of Performing Intended Safety Functions & OPPD Adequately Addressed Requested Actions Discussed in GL 95-07 ML20206M2601999-05-0606 May 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee IPEEE Complete Re Info Requested by Suppl 4 to GL 88-20 & IPEEE Results Reasonable Given FCS Design,Operation & History LIC-99-0047, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With ML20195E8621999-04-30030 April 1999 Performance Indicators, for Apr 1999 ML20205Q5831999-04-15015 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 190 to License DPR-40 ML20210J4331999-03-31031 March 1999 Changes,Tests, & Experiments Carried Out Without Prior Commission Approval for Period 981101-990331.With USAR Changes Other than Those Resulting from 10CFR50.59 ML20206G2641999-03-31031 March 1999 Performance Indicators Rept for Mar 1999 LIC-99-0034, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Fcs,Unit 1.With ML20205J8181999-02-28028 February 1999 Performance Indicators, for Feb 1999 LIC-99-0025, Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20207F3291999-01-31031 January 1999 FCS Performance Indicators for Jan 1999 ML20203B0991998-12-31031 December 1998 Performance Indicators for Dec 1998 LIC-99-0026, 1998 Omaha Public Power District Annual Rept. with1998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Omaha Public Power District Annual Rept. with LIC-99-0003, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station.With ML20198S3771998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 189 to License DPR-40 ML20198S4831998-12-31031 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 188 to License DPR-40 ML20196G2251998-12-18018 December 1998 Rev 2 to EA-FC-90-082, Potential Over-Pressurization of Containment Penetration Piping Following Main Steam Line Break in Containment ML20198M3141998-11-30030 November 1998 Performance Indicators Rept for Nov 1998 LIC-98-0172, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With LIC-98-0160, Special Rept:On 981113,MSL RM RM-064 Was Declared Inoperable Due to Leakage Past Isolation Valve HCV-922.Troubleshooting Has Indicated That Leakage Has Stopped & Cause of Leak Continues to Be Investigated1998-11-25025 November 1998 Special Rept:On 981113,MSL RM RM-064 Was Declared Inoperable Due to Leakage Past Isolation Valve HCV-922.Troubleshooting Has Indicated That Leakage Has Stopped & Cause of Leak Continues to Be Investigated ML20203B0721998-11-16016 November 1998 Rev 6 to HI-92828, Licensing Rept for Spent Fuel Storage Capacity Expansion ML20196E4981998-10-31031 October 1998 Performance Indicators Rept for Oct 1998 ML20196G2441998-10-31031 October 1998 Changes,Tests & Experiments Carried Out Without Prior Commission Approval. with USAR Changes Other than Those Resulting from 10CFR50.59 LIC-98-0154, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20154M4881998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 186 to License DPR-40 ML20154N2411998-10-19019 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 187 to License DPR-40 LIC-98-0136, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station,Unit 1.With ML20155G4261998-09-30030 September 1998 Performance Indicators for Sept 1998 ML20154A1251998-08-31031 August 1998 Performance Indicators, Rept for Aug 1998 LIC-98-0122, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Fort Calhoun Station Unit 1.With ML20238F7231998-08-17017 August 1998 Owner'S Rept for Isis ML18066A2771998-08-13013 August 1998 Part 21 Rept Re Deficiency in CE Current Screening Methodology for Determining Limiting Fuel Assembly for Detailed PWR thermal-hydraulic Sa.Evaluations Were Performed for Affected Plants to Determine Effect of Deficiency 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
.
,v a cvg'o, UNITED STATES j 4
[e .g f) NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
\...../ SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION i
BASES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 2.4, "CONTAINHENT COOLING" FORT CALHOUN STATION, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-285 l
1.0 EVALUATION In a letter dated March 26, 1987, Omaha Public Power District (licensee) requested editorial changes in the Technical Specification Bases relating to containment cooling. The proposed changes to the Bases for Section 2.4 serves to editorially change an error, make phrases and statements )
more accurate, and reflect current terminology. (
2.0 EVALUATION f A Safety Systems Outage Modification Inspection Team conducted inspections in late 1985 and early 1986. Among the findings of the team was an ;
apparent typographical error in the Bases to Technical Specification 2.4. !
The Bases of the Technical Specification has remained in its current state ;
since the original issue of the operating license. l The statement to be changed currently reads, "Three component cooling j waterheatexchgngershavesufficientcapacity(withamplereserve)to remove 402 x 10 Btu /hr following a loss-of-coolant accident." The Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR), Section 9.7.5 (consistent with the FinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)),speciffestheaccidentcapacityof a component water 6 heat exchanger as 134 x 10 Btu /hr, resulting in a total of 402 x 10 Btu /hr for three component cooling water heat exchangers.
The phrase regarding "with ample reserve" has been removed. " Ample" is a subjective term; and information in the Technical Specifications is definitive, whereas "with ample capacity" is not.
In addition, the statement, "the component cooling water system equipment ,
is accessible for the repair after a loss-of-coolant accident," has been removed from the Bases. Radiation studies done after the incident at Three Mile Island indicates that this statement may be somewhat misleading. <
Further, the Bases to Technical Specifications should be founded in fact rather than sweeping generalizations. For this reason, the licensee purposes to delete this statement: Also, the fact is that removing this statement has no impact on the specification.
Finally, the reference to "FSAR" in Section 2.4 have been reworded to i "USAR". This change is simply in keeping with the current terminology. f 1
8706170011 870610 PDR ADOCK 0500{ S P
q
-i
- 3. 0. CONCLOSION-J Based on our review, we' concur with the licensee that the proposed changes are ' editorially in nature to the Bases for Technical Specifica-tions, Section 2.4, and is appropriate and necessary to clarify the Bases. t Principal Contributor:
-A. Bournia Dated:
' i l
2.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION I 2.4 Containment Cooling (Continued) J component cooling heat exchangers and shutdown heat exchangers. A full-capacity diesel generator is connected to each of the two engineered safeguards 4.16-kV buses. Three engineered safeguards 480-Volt double- I ended load centers are provided; of the six transformers, three are !
connected to each of the two 4.16-kV buses. Two load centers are operated as two-bus-section units; the third is provided with a center i bus manually transferable to either associated end section. The center i bus section supplies HPSI Pump SI-2C, CS Pump SI-3C and Charging Pump CH-1C any of which can thus be supplied from either 4.16-kV bus if required. Three component gooling heat exchangers have sufficient l
capacity g remove 402 x 10 BTU /hr following a loss-of-coolant accident. The containment sprays initially take coolant from the safety injection and refueling water (SIRW) Before this supply ofwaterisexhausted(atleast24 minutes)gnk. the spray system is transferred to the recirculation mode and the pumps take suction from the containment sump. One shutdown cooling heat exchanger is sufficient to satisfy the g ay system requirements during the long-term containment cooling period. In addition, in the unlikely event of the component cooling water supply being lost, raw water can be utilized for direct cooling of the shutdown heat exchangers and containment cooling coils.(4)
The containment spray system is redundant with the containment air recirculation, cogng and iodine removal system for the containment cooling function. The spray system is sized such that two of the three spray pumps would limit the containment pressure to below the design value following a DBA without taking credit for g air coolers or the cooling capacity of the safety injection system. Similarly, two cooling and filtering units or one cooling and filtering unit and bothcoolingunitshavethecapabilityoflimitingthegntainment pressure under the same conditions as two spray pumps.
The redundant cooling equipment provided to limit the containment pressure following a DBA is divided between the independent power supply systems. The raw water and component cooling water pumps are similarly distributed on the 4.16-kV and 480 Volt buses to serve the above cooling groups. Each cooling group has a design capacity equal to that required to restrict the containment pressure to below the design value. In the event of a DBA, loss of normal power sources and failure of one diesel-generator to operate, better than one full group would be connected to the available diesel generator, thus providing more than ample reserve. Any one unit removed from a given bus does not restrict the groups which can be connected to one diesel-generator l from fulfilling their design function. The removal of two units from buses which can be connected to one diesel generator could limit the capability of the associated cooling groups; therefore, to ensure availability of the power supply to che redundant equipment in the event of loss of normal power sources, the diesel-generator serving this redundant equipment is started to demonstrate operability. During 1
I l
2-26 Ltr dated:
1
., i I
2.0 LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION I2.4 ' Containment Cooling (Continued) .
I normal power operation either two air cooling and filtering units or {
two air; cooling units and one air cooling and filtering unit are in operationto(gmoveheatlostfrompipingandequipmentwithinthe f containment. In' addition, if during the post-accident phase the component cooling water supply is lost, containment cooling could be
- maintained until repairs are effected. The component cooling system pumps and heat exchanger,-the spray pumpu and t
. changers are located in the auxiliary building.gg)sgownThe heat rawex-- l water pumps are located in the intake structure.(33)
References (1)' USAR, Section 9.7.5 .
(2) USAR, Section 6.2.3.1 (3) 'USAR, Section 6.2.3.4 (4) USAR, Section 9.8.2 (5) USAR, Section 6.4.5 .
(6) USAR, Section 6.3.5 (7) USAR, Section l'4.16.5 (8) USAR, Section 9.10.2.3 (9) USAR, Section 9.7 I (10) USAR, Section 6.3 l (11) USAR, Section 9.8 l
i 2-27 Ltr dated:
i