ML20215A356
| ML20215A356 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 09/17/1986 |
| From: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20213F403 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-51FR35206, RULE-PR-11, RULE-PR-25 AC-2-6, AC00-2-6, NUDOCS 8612110259 | |
| Download: ML20215A356 (11) | |
Text
..
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR PARTS 11 AND 25 Amendment to Access Authorization Fee Schedule Publication For Licensee Personnel AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY
- The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regula-tions to revise the schedule for publishing access authorization investigation fees charged to licensee personnel who require access to National Security Information and/or Restricted Data and Special Nuclear Material. The amendments are needed to notify licensees that NRC will publish fee adjustments concurrent with notification from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
, EFFECTIVE DATE: (insertdateofpublication)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dopp, Chief, Facilities Security' and Operational Support Branch, Division of Security, Office of Administration, U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission, Washington,D.C.20555, telephone (301)
, 492-4124. '.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Personnel Management conducts access authorization background investigations for the NRC and sets the cost for these investigations. In accordance with current regulations, the access authoriza-tion fee rates are published in the Federal Register during July of each year.
gg21lg259e61206 11 50FR39076 PDR 10 CFR PARTS 11/25 08/19/86
_- - ---._ _ - _---m---- - - - - - - . m. _. . - m. . - - - - - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - -
e .-
Since NRC's fees are wholly dependent on the background investigation rate charged by OPM, a more accurate and efficient regulatory requirement would be '
to publish revisions to the access authorization fee concurrently with OPM's notification to NRC of a revised background investigation rate change.
Because these are amendments dealing with agency practice and procedure, the notice and comment provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act do not apply pursuantto5U.S.C.553(b)(A). The amendments are effective upon publication in the Federal Register. Good cause exists to dispense with the usual 30-day delay in effective date because the amendments are of a minor and administrative nature dealing with a matter of agency procedure, a change in the schedule for notifying licensees of adjustment in access authorization fees.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION The NRC has determined that this final regulation 1: the type of action described in categorical exclusion 10 CFR 51.22(c)(1). Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment has been prepared for this final regulation. ,
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT This final rule does not contain a new or amended infonnation collection
, requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980(44U.S.C.3501 etseq.).
REGULATORY ANALYSIS The Connissior has prepared a regulatory analysis on this final regulation.
The analysis examines the costs and benefits of the alternatives considered by 10 CFR PARTS 11/25 08/19/86
the Comission. The analysis is available for inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, N. W., Washington, D. C. Single copies of the --
analysis may be obtained f rom Richard A. Dopp, Division of Security, Office of Administration, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D. C. 20555, telephone: (301)492-4124.
REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY CERTIFICATION In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)),
the Comission certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Each NRC licensee or other organization which may require access to classified information or Special Nuclear Material in connection with a license or application for a license will be affected by this final rule. Less than 13 entities are currently required to meet the requirements of 10 CFR Parts 11 and 25. Because none of these has been determined to be small as defined by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, the Comission finds that this rule will not have significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small entities.
LIST OF. SUBJECTS .
10 CFR PART 11 Hazardoas materials - transportation, Nuclear materials, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Special nuclear material.
10 CFR PART 25 Classified information. Investigations, Penalty, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures.
10 CFR PARTS 11/25 08/19/86
, i .
- For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of the Atomic
- Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, and 5 U.S.C. 553, the NRC is adopting the following amendments to 10 CFR Parts 11 and 25.
PART 11 - CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR ACCESS TO OR CONTROL OVER SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL (1) The authority citation for Part 11 is revised to read as follows:
AUTEORITY: Sec.161, 68 Stat. 948, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201); sec. 201, 88 Stat.1242,asamended(42U.S.C.5841).
Section 11.15(e) also issued under sec. 501, 85 Stat. 290 (31 U.S.C. 483a).
1 (2) Section 11.15(e) is revised to read as follows:
611.15 Application for special nuclear material access authorization.
(e)(1) Each application for special nuclear material access authorization, renewal. or change in level must'be accompanied by the licensee's remittance payable to the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission according to the following schedule:
e 10 CFR PARTS 11/25 08/19/86
.--.m_.__... . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . , . . . . . .- ..m.... __._ - _ . ._. . _ .
j i . NRC-U requi ri ng f ull field i nvestigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,580
- 11. NRC-U based on certification of comparable full field background .
investigation................................................... O )y 111. NRC-U or R renewal.............................................. 15 iv. NRC-R........................................................... 15 3
2
- v. NRC-R based on certification of comparable investigation........ 0 1
(2) Material access authorization fees will be published each time the Office
} of Personnel Management notifies NRC of a change in the background investiga-tion rate it charges NRC for conducting the investigation. Any such changed access authorization fees will be applicable to each access authorization request received upon or af ter the date of publication. Applications frcm individuals having current Federal access authorizations may be processed expeditiously at no cost, since the Commission may accept the certification of access authorizations and investigative data from other Federal government agencies which grant personnel access authorizations.
I lf the NRC determines, based on its review of available data, that a full field investigation is necessary, a fee of 51,580 will be assessed prior to the conduct of such investigation.
E lf the NRC determines, based on its review of available data, that a National Agency Check investigation is necessary, a fee of 515.00 will be assessed prior to the conduct of such investigation; however, if a full field investigation is deemed necessary by the NRC based on its review of available data, a fee of 51,580 will be assessed prior to the conduct of such investigation.
10 CFR PARTS 11/25 08/19/86
- i X '
PART 25 - ACCESS AUTHORIZATION FOR LICENSEE PERSONNEL i
- 3. The authority citation for Part 25 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: Secs. 145, 161, 68 Stat. 942, 948, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2165, 2201); sec. 201, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5841); E.O. 10865, as amended, 3 CFR 1959-1963 COMP., p. 398 (50 U.S.C. 401, note); E.O. 12356, 47 FR 14874, April 6, 1982.
Appendix A also issued under 96 Stat. 1051 (31 U.S.C. 9701).
For the purposes of sec. 223, 68 Stat. 958, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2273);
$525.13,25.17(a),25.33(b)and(c)areissuedundersec. 1611, 68 Stat. 949,
! as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201(i)); and 6525.13 and 25.33(b) are issued under sec.
4 1610, 68 Stat. 950, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201(o)).
i j 4. Section 25.17(e) is revised to read as follows:
625.17 Approval for processing applicants for access authorization.
(e) Applications for access authorization processing must be accompanied by a check or money order, payable to the United States Nuclear Regulatory
- Consnission, representing the current cost for the processing of each "Q" and 1
"L" access authorization request. Access authorizatien fees will be published each time the Office of Personnel Management notifies NRC of a change in the
. background investigation rate it charges NRC for conducting the investigations.
Any such changed access authorization fees will be applicable to each access authorization request received upon or after the date of publication. Applica-tions from individuals having current Federal access authorizations may be .
processed expeditiously at less cost, since the Comission may accept the 10 CFR PARTS 11/25 ,08/19/86
7 7 ,
4 certification of access authorization and investigative data from other Federal Government agencies which grant personnel access authorizations. . -
Dated at Bethesda, Maryland, this 17th day of September, 1986, f
For the Nuclear Regulatory Comission.
f d
c c /- ,
Y Victor Stello, Jr/ '
Executive Director for Operai. ions, f
I a
e 9
e l
h ,
i e
4
.)
. ,e s ri
.l $
e d J D
, $ dm 10 CFR PARTS 11/25 .
08%19/86 ,
., ?
PDR fr C OO ' b 33208 Federal Registe' Vol. 51. No.191 / 'Ituraday. October ? 186 / Rul2s tnd Regulations u The brucellosis Class Free warranted in onier to delete Executive Onler 12372 classification is based on a Imding of no unnecessary restrictions on the known brucellosis nn smttle for the p n" ' '
interstate movement of certain cattle Ca 1go ed)ral ad es!s period of 12 months preceding from Puerto Rico. under No.10.025 and is subject to the classification as Class Free.The Class C Furthu. pursur.nuo the provisions of Executive Order 12372.
I ific tio if S Ih administrative procedure provisions in 5 which requires intergovernmental Ihehighestrateo br celfos s .
U.S.C. 533, it is found upon good cause consultation with State and local Classes A and B in between. that prior notee and other pubhc officials. (See CFR Part 3015. Subpart V).
Restrictions on the movement of cattle procedures with respect to ihls interim are more stringent for movements from rule are impracticable and contrary to W M CFR PM Class A States or Areas compared to movements from Free States or Areas, the public interest, and good cause is Animal diseases. Brucellosis. Cattle.
and are more stringent for movements found fo making this interim rule Hogs. Quarantine. Transportation.
from Class B States or Areas compared effectiva less than 30 days after to movements from Class A States or public.ation of this document in the Areas and so on.ne restrictions Federal Register. Comments are being Accordingly 9 CFR Part 78is include testing of certain cattle when solicited for 80 days after publication of amended as follows:
cattle are moved fmm chr than Clsse this document and a final document 1.The authority citation for Part 78 Free States or Areas. discussing comments received and any amendments required will be published c nunues to read as follows:
The basic standards for the different classifications of States or Areas in the Federal Register as soon as Authodty: 21 U.S C.111-114e-1.114s.115.
possible. 1tr. tsa 121.123-1as 134b.134F 7 QR 3.17 concern maintenance of:(1) A State or 2.51. anW4 Area. wide accumulated 12 consecutive month herd infection rate not to exceed Executive Order 12291 and Regulatory g 3 a stated level:(2) a Market Cattle Flexibility Act identification (MCI) reactor prevalence %Is rule is issued in conformance adding " Puerto Rico;" tamediately rate not to exceed a stated rate (this with Executive Order 12291 and has before "Rhode Island."
concerns the testing of cattle at auction been determined to be not a " major 3. In i 78.20(b)," Puerto Rico"is markets. stockyards. and slaughtering rule". Based on information compiled by removed.
lagt . DC.this 22 day of Q-I ichin udes les
' d a ug e ng program t s 11noh effect on the economy, will not cause a ae & h es bi e o an , silly G.johness,
' malw incuew in costs e pdces fw Acting DeputyAdministmror. Veterinary identifying and monitoring herds at high consumers, Individuals industries, s,,vic
- risk ofinfection. Including herde
' E q .:s.! adjacent to affected herde and herde Federal, State, or local government - (FR Doc. es-222se Filed to-t-se; s.45 am)
'~~' from which infected animals have been agencies, or geographic regions: and will - ,,,,u m sold or received under approved action n t cause adverse effects on plans: and (4) minimum procedural competition. employment. lavestment, standards for administering the productivity, innovation, or on the NUCLEAR REQULATORY 3M t
program. ability of United States-based COgsaAISSION Prior to the effective date of this. . enterprises to compete with foralgn-document. Puerto Rico was classified as based enterprises in domestic or export 10 CFR Parts 11and 25
' a Class A State. It had been necessary markets.
to classify Puerto Rico as " Class A" For this action. the Office of Amendment to Access Authortantion
, rather than Class Free because of the Management and Budget has walved the Fee Schedule; Publication for Lloenoce presence of brucellosis. To attain and review process required by Executive Pwsonnel mainta;n Class Free status, a State or Order 12291. AotNew Nuclear Regulatory Area must, among other things. remala Cattle moved interstate are moved for Commisalon.
free from brucellosis in cattle for the slaughter, for use as bruding stock, or preceding 12 month period and the ACTiose: Final rule.
for feeding. Changing the status of adjusted MCI reactor prevalence rate for Puerto Rico reduces certain sussesAnn De Nuclear Regulatory such 12. month period must not exceed requirements on the interstate Commission (NRC)is amending its N'- t'ne reactor per 2.000 cattle tested (0.050 movement of these cattle. Cattle from regulations to revise the schedule for e percent). A review of brucellosis Certified Brucellosis-Free Herds moving publishing access authorisation program records established that Puerto interstate are not affected by the change investigation fees charged to licensee i, Rico should be changed to Class Free personnel who require access to in status. It has been determined that c since Puerto Rico now meets the criteria the changes in brucellosis status made National Security Information and/or for classification as Class Free. Restricted Data and Special Nuclear by this document will not affect Emergency Actles marketing patterns and will not have a Material.%e amendments are needed
) to notify licensees that NRC will publish j Dr. [ohn K. Atwell. Depu significant economic impact on those persons affected by this document. fee adjustments concurrent with Administratorof the Anima and Plant notification from the Office of Personnel liealth Inspection for Veterinary Under these circumstances, the Services, has determined that an Management (OPM).
Administrator of the Animal and Plant emergency situation exists which liealth Inspection Service has sprecmt dam October 2.1988.
warrants publication of this laterim rule determined that this action will not have Pon PtMITHta psPopesAftose coeffACT.'
without prior opportunity for public a significant economic impact on a . Richard A.Dopp. Chief. Facilities comment. Immediate action is substantial number of small entities. - Security and Operational Support l
l 1
l l
e ,;
Feder:.1 Regisier / Vo 1. ND.191] Hursday Octobzr 2,1986 Julze end Rzgulstions 35207 i
- Branch, Division of Security, Office of Wuhington, DC 20555, telephone: (301)
M W .Y.*** T .,,, '"
Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 492-4124.
n( 9 24 ogu a ex blHty CerdRcanon a NO
< eupptassesrunv seronssplant %e In accordanco with the Regulatory ecc.a esses a nm <
Oisice of Personnel Management Flexibility Act of1980 (5 US.C. 005(b)), '=esaemam **
conducts access authorisation the Commission certifies that this rule ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
background investigations for the NRC will not have a significant economic am . w. .
I and sets the cost for these impact on a substantial number of small := . i.ls m me e w = e. .mani a m i investigations.In accordance with entities. Each NRC licensee or other a s #e NRC empi e., se d R h me. W eu th current regulations, the access organization which may require access E .T.*,'Is"8.7'm"".O M."."."Me l' authorisation fee rates are published in to classified information or Special Nuclear Material in connection with a
,",,,,,4
- e. wee om %.. . m.W,o,.J f 8 L. m**u,m, mag,",,a ;
the Federal Register during July of each a etss ma me saw = e.
year. license or application for a license will ""*"*'*"""""
Since NRC's fees ass wholly be affected by this final rule. Less than dependent on the backgro.md (2) Material access authorization fees 13 entities are currently required to meet will be published each time the Office of investigation rate charged by OPM, a the requirements of to CFR Parts 11 and Personnel Management notifies NRC of more accurate and efficient regulatory 25.Because none of these has been a change in the background
- p. requirement would be to publish determined to be small as defined by the investigation rate it charges NRC for revisions to the access authorisation fee Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, the concurrently with OPM's notification to conducting the investigation. Any such Commission finds that this rule will not changed access authorization fees will NRC of a revised background have significant economic impact upon a be appucable to each accou i investigation rate change. substantial number of small entities.
Because these are amendmer.ts authorization request received upon or dealing with agency practice and IJet of Subjects after the date of publication.
procedure, the notice and comment 10 CFR #brt !J Applications from individuals having provisions of the. uninistrative current Federal access authorizations Hazardous materials-transportation. may be processed expeditiously at no I Procedure Act do not apply pursuant to Nuclar materials, Reporting and cost, since the Comm'ssion may accept 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A). He amendments are recordkeeping requirements, Security effective u pubt t n in F the certification of access authorizations measures, Special nuclear material. and investigative data from other w the usual 3Niay delay in effective 20 CFR Pbtf 25 ed' '
date because the amendments are of a ant s au ti ns.
Classified information, Investigations, . . . . .
minor and administrative nature dealing Penalty, Reporting and recordkeeping
- with a matter of agency procedure, a requirements Securitymeasures.
t change in the schedule for notifying PART 25-ACCESS AUTHORIZATION For the reasons set out in the FOR LICENSEE PERSONNEL licensees of adjustment in access
-' preamble and under the authority of the cuthorisation fees. ' Atomic Energy Act of1954, as amended, 3.%e authority citation for Part 25 EavironmentalImmpaet Categorical the Energy Reorganization Act of1974, continues to read as follows:
Exclusion as amended, and 5 U.S.C. 553, the NRC Authertry: Sece.145. tet, se Stat. e42, see.
The NRC has detennined that this is adopting the following amendments to as amended (42 Uit 21es. 2201): sec. 201, se final regulation is the type of action 10 CFR Parts 11 and 25. Stat.1242, as amended (42 Uit as41):E.O.
\ described in categorical exclusion to
- PART11--CRITERIA AND (50U 401 no ):E 12358, 7 FR" CFR 51.22(c)(1). nerefore, neither an PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING 14e74, Aprils test.
environmental impact statement nor an ELIGIBILITY FOR ACCESS TO OR Appendix A also leeued under se Stat.1051 environmental assessment has been CONTROL OVER SPECIAL NUCLEAR (at Uic.erot.)
( prepared for this Ansi regulation. MATERIAL. For the purposes of sec.223.es Stat,eSe se Nyerwork Reduction Act Statemenn amended (42 U.S.C 2273): II 25.13,25.17(a).
1.The authority citation for Part 111s 25.33 (b) and (c) are issued under sec. sett, se This final rule does not contain a new - revised to read as follows: Stat. ses, as amended (42 UAC 2201(1)): and I cr amended information collection Authority: Sec.181,es Stat.eso, as il 25.13 and 25.33(b) are leeued undem requirement subject to the Paperwork 1sto, se Stat. eso, as amended (42 UAC .
amended (42 UAC 2201): sec. 201. as Stat.
Reduction Act of 1900 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. 1242. as amended (42 U.S.C 0441). 2201(oB.
seq.). Section 11.15(e) also issued under sec. 001,
- 4. Section 25.17(e) is revised to read as Regulatory Analysis - 88 8'' * I3I*U#C ****I' fhs
%e Commission has pared a regulatosy analysis on t final " I W7 A8"'8
- P*""8 A
regulation.%s analysis exernines the 911.15 Applienteen for specisi nuclear appecents W seous N costs and benefits of the alternatives materialassoas authertsecon.
considered by the Commission.The * * * * * (e) Applications for access erslysie is available for inspection in * (e)(1) Each application for special authorization processing must be the NRC Public Document Room,1717 H nuclear material access authorization, accompanied by a check or money Street NW., Washington DC. Single renewal.or change in level must be order, payable to the Un4ed States copies of the analysis may be obtained accompanied by the licensee's - Nuclear Regulatory Commission, from Richard A.Dopp, Division of . remittance payable to the U.S. Nuclear representing the current cost for the Security Office of Administration,U.S. Regalatory Commiselon according to the processing of each "Q" and "L" access Nuclear Regulatory Commission. following schedule: authorization request. Access s
t i
I
,. . E .f 3520e Federal Register / Vol. 51 No.191/ 'Ihursday. October 2,1986 / Rules and Regulations authorization fees will be published Region.12 New Englanet Executive Park. List of Subjects in te CFR Part 39 Burlington. Massachusetts 01803, and Engines. Air tunspodatin. Aircrsh, each time the Office of Personnel may be examined between the hours of Aviation safety. .s s.arstion by Management notifies NRC of a change in the background investigation rate it 8:00 a.m. and 420 .m., Monday through "I'""C**
charges NRC for conducting the Friday, except Fe eralbolidays.
Adoption of the Amendment Investigations. Any such changed access yon punnean anyonssanoes coerracy:
4l Marc J. Pouthillier. Engine Certification authorisation fees will be applicable to PART 39-(AMENDED) each access authorization request Branch. ANE-142. Engine Certification received upon or after the date of Office. Aircraft Certification Division
- Accordingly, pursuant to the authority Publicatjon. Applications from Federal Aviation Administration.New *
- j individuals having current Federal England Region, u New England Executive Park.Burlington*
f' trati r kFAA the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)
Pad 30 d accesa authorisations may be processed
{
expeditiously at less cost, since the Massachusetts 01803, telephone (617) **#"". '
Commission may accept the certification 273-7085. *"" *"* * "" t of access authorisation and supptaesswfany aeronesAnoet A conunm to mad as foHm: >
Investigative data from other Federal proposal to amend Part 30 of the Federal Autherley:4e U.S.C.1354(a).1421. and 1423; Government agencies which grant Aviation Regulations to include an AD 49 U.S.C.1on(gl (Revised Pub. L 97-440.
l personnel acess authorizations. which would require installation of January 12.tss3) and14 cmit.ao.
Deted at Betheede. Marytend. this 17th day oversize HpT nosale guide vanes on =
of Septeraber, sees.
certain R-R Dart turboprop engines was 330.13 (Assended!
For the Neclear Regulatory Commission. published in the Federal Register on 2.By addingto i 39.13 the following June 17,1986 (51 FR 21924). g gy, Victor Stella, lr, '
j De proposal was prompted by Rolls.Royos pic: Applies to Rolls-Royce Dart F.xecutive Directorfor Opemtions.
reports of HCF crackins of HPT disk Mks.su sooF.sm SMA.511,511,"F, ,
(m Doc.86-22364 Filed t&t-as aos am) rims in certain R-R Dart turboprop 514. 5107, and 515 turboprop engines. f
"' engines.nese cracks have caused r' ;"--is required as indicated, unises i uncontained separation of the disk rim. i It has been determined by test that alreadyse ;"-M To prevent cracking of high pressure l DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION excessive gap between nozzle guide ;
' turbine disks. Install aew or reworked vane groups can allow hot gases to 188 high pressure nostle guide vane (s) in )
Federal Aviation Administration impinge on the disk rim,in turn "
4' 14 CFR Part 30 softening the rim material and allowing *CN'y g, "$YC 451 Revis 5' f l
HCF cracks to form.Here have been 31 dekd June tee 2,or FAA approved IDooket Nusnber M. ANE-19Amendsnent known occmaces of disk rim HCF equivelent.by October 1.tser.
39 64861 cracking.19 of which resulted in release Airwaft may be ferried in accordance with of a segment of disk rim of which 5 the provisions of FAR 21.197 and 21.100 to a
' Airworthiness DirectiveslMoRe-Royce base where the AD can be accomplished.
Dart Mka.506,506F 510,510A,511, were uncontained. Since this condition Upon request, an equivalent means of islikely to exist or develop on other compliance with the requirements of this AD 511-7E,514,514-7, and 515 Turboprop engines of the same type design,an AD may be approved by the Manager. Engine Enginee is being issued which requires Cenincaum OfGce. Aircrah Cedincaba Aossocy: Federal Aviation installation of oversize HPTnozzle Msion. Federal Aviaba AdmWetraha.
guide vanes to achieve the required 8 Administration (FAA). DOT.
Interplatform gap between vane groups. $",, ,*p"N*B8' $as"es'chtu actiose: Final rule. InWed pans han bun aNW ossos, suesssaav:This amendment adopts a an opportunity to participatein the Upon submission of substantiating data by en owner or operator through an FAA new airworthiness directive (AD) which maing is annedmut.No maintenance inspector. the Mansper. Engine ,
m,,._
requires installation of oversize h comments were received. A ,. .
Certl6 cation Of$ce. New England Region, pressure turbine (HPT) nozzle sul the proposalis adopted without change. may adjust the compliance time specified in vanes on certain Rolls-Royce (R-R) Dart this AD.
turboprop engines.The AD is needed to Conclusion R-R SB Da78 451. Revision 5. dated iume Prevent high cycle fatigue (HCF) g, py has determined that this seat,idenused and desaibed in this cracking of the HPT disk which could regulation involves 102 engines, and the result in an uncontained engine failure. cost per engine willvary with the d7,dg"p$,*,7to p U 52 )( . A Dats: Effective November 4.1986, amant of rework or replacement persons effected by this directive who have required,but is not considered not already received this document from the Compliance-As required in the body manufacturer may obtain copies upon request of the AD. significant with respect to the cost of Incorporation by Reference- engine overhaul. Therefore. I certify that to Rolls-Royce ple--East Kilbride, Atta: Dart Engine Service Manager.Clasgow G74-4PY.
Approved by the Director of the Federal this action:(1)is not a " major rule" Scotland.nis document may also be Register on November 4.1986. under Executive Order 1229t: (2) is not a examined at the Office of the Regional moonasses:The applicable service "significant rule'* under DOT Regulatory Counsel. Federal Aviaba Administradoc.
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; ' 8*
bulletin (SB) may be obtained from M s Auuns Rolls-Royce plo-East Kilbride. Attn:
February 26,1979):(3) does not warrant P fButll' Dart Engine Service Manager. Glasgow preparetionof aregulatoryevaluation - 01803. Room 311. Rules Docket Number as-as the anticipated impact is so minimal: ANE-19 betwnn the hours of 8:00 man. and G74-4PY Scotland. 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, except A copy of the S8 is contained in Rules and (4) will not have significant Federal holidays.
Docket Number 86-ANEr.19,in the economicimpact on a substantial number of small entities under criteria nis amendment becomu effective on Office of the Regional Counsel. Federal November 4.1see.
Aviation Administration. New England of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
l l
f
- . . T)DR Acbb-A PRELIMINARY REGULATORY ANALYSIS As a result of an informal meeting held between representatives of ADM and Walter S. Schwink, DEDR0GR/EDO, it was decided that a preliminary regulatory analysis for this rulemaking was not necessary since it was. wholly ministerial in nature and has no appreciable or measurable effect on the licensee.
It should be noted, however, that this rulemaking does impact on the NRC in a positive, economizing fashion, by discontinuing the practice of.fonnally revising fees charged to licensees for access authorizations through the rulemaking process.
Currently,10 CFR 25.17 requires the publications of access authorization fees in July of each year. This practice of annual rulemaking requires approximately 250 staff hours each year. This annual publication of fees has occurred since 1981, and has never resulted in a coment or criticism from those whom it affects. The staff has concluded that a more accurate and efficient means of notifying affected licensees would be to revise the access authorization fee schedule concurrent with Office of. Personnel Management's (0PM) notification to NRC of its background investigation rate changes since NRC's fees are wholly dependent on the rate charged by OPM.
There is no additional burden or cost to the public or industry resulting from this rulemaking. The savings to NRC per year are estimated to be
$13,200. NRC resources needed for rulemaking are estimated at less than
.1 FTE.
J t
e 6'