ML20214V616
| ML20214V616 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 05/28/1987 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20214V613 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8706120192 | |
| Download: ML20214V616 (2) | |
Text
_ __
~
'o UNITED $TATES g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION a
8 7.
ij WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%.,* /
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.100 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-72 FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION. ET AL.
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-302 INTRODUCTION By letter dated January 24, 1985, as supplemented February 17, 1987 Florida Power Corporation -(FPC or the licensee) requested an ' amendment to the Technical Specifications (TSs) appended to Facility Operating License No. DPR-72 for the i
Crystal River Unit No. 3 Nuclear Generating Plant (CR-3). The proposed amendment would correct two errors in the Engineered Safety Features (ESF) Section of Technical Specifications (TS). The February 17, 1987, submittal withdrew the third change which was requested in your initial application.
EVALUATION The first correction deletes item 5.d (Table 4.3-2), " Manual Initiation (HPI Isolation)" from " Reactor Building Isolation." The " Manual Initiation" functional group was mistakenly added to the specification when the diverse containment isolation function ("HPI Isolation") was added as part of NUREG-0578, Short-Tem Corrective Actions. This was an administrative error and its correction is acceptable.
4 The second correction reverses the inequality sign for item 5.a.5 (Table 3.3-4) 2 "RCS Pressure Low (HPI Isolation)." The correct setpoint must be greater than or equal to 1500 psig. This correction clarifies the allowable value and is acceptable.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION This amendment involves a change in the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.
We have determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding. Accordingly, this amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need 4
be prepared in ccnnection with the issuance of this amendment.
i 8706120192 870528 l
PDR ADOCK 0500 2
i p
, - - - ~ - - - -
~ - _. - - - -
CONCLUSION We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public.
will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of this amendrent will not be inimical to the emnmon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Dated:
May 28, 1987 Principal Contributor:
B. Mozafari