ML20214M139
ML20214M139 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Rancho Seco |
Issue date: | 06/30/1985 |
From: | Bradley E, Gardner R, Oesterling R SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20214M119 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8609100551 | |
Download: ML20214M139 (47) | |
Text
E SEMIANh3AL RADI0 ACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JANUARY-JUNE 1986 RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION ADDENDUM A Addendum to Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report, January-June 1985 5
5 t
I t
t 860828 8609100SS1ADOCK PDR PDR 05000312 R
E EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This report has been prepared by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District for submittal to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in meeting reporting requirements under the Operating License for the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 1. Copies of the report are provided to the NRC, California Energy Commission, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento State University, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, local libraries, and District offices as a public document.
The report is the Semiannual Effluent Release Report. This report deals with radioactive waste shipments and environmental effluent releases and an estimation of releases' impact upon the environment and on man. This report covers the period of January 1, 1985 to June 30, 1985.
This is the first Semiannual Effluent Report to be submitted under the " dose I based" Technical Specifications required by 10CFR50, Appendix "I". The NRC has provided guidance in preparing this report in the form of Regulatory Guide 1.21 " Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluent from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power plants." The District has used the guidance of Regulatory Guide 1.21 to generate the report.
One of the requirements of the Rancho Seco Technical Specifications is that the site have an approved Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The ODCM contains the technical methodology of how offsite releases are authorized, calculated, documented, and doses determined. The use of this NRC approved document considerably reduces the effort needed to explain to the Commission how the results were obtained.
The report itself is composed of four major areas. These areas are: the radioactive solid waste report, the liquid and gaseous effluent summaries, the calculated dose to the Maximum Hypothetical Individual and to the environment as a result of site releases, and the supporting materials used to generate the report. These . supporting materials include meteorological data, environmental TLD results and the updated ODCM.
In 1984, the dose calculations indicated that 10CFR50 Appendix I guidelines values for the liquid effluent pathways had been exceeded. In order to further reduce offsite exposures, a liquid effluent reduction program was implemented in October, 1984. This reduction program has reduced the quantity of radioactive liquid releases in 1985 and have brought Rancho Seco liquid effluent releases within the 10CFR50 Appendix I design objectives.
First and Second Quarter liquid and gaseous effluent releases are less than the Technical Specification limits.
This report is respectfully submitted as representing a concerted effort by District staff in fulfilling obligations to regulatory agencies and the general public to document the safe operation of the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Unit No.1.
I
I -
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I
RANCHO SECO SECTION B. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION - EFFLUENT AND WASTE DISPOSAL REPORT A. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Supplemental information as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21 is presented in this section of the report.
B. GASEOUS EFFLUENTS Gaseous effluents at ground level release are summarized in Table 1A, I " Summation of All Gaseous Effluents," and Table IC, " Continuous Mode and Batch Mode Releases." No credit is taken for elevated releases; therefore, Table 1B is not applicable.
There were 7 Waste Gas Decay Tank releases, 17 Reactor Building purges, and 8 miscellaneous releases during the period January I through June 30, 1985. There were no abnormal releases of radioactive gases in this report period.
C. LIQUID EFFLUENTS As a result of steam generator tube failures in May 1981, November 1982, September 1983, and July, August, and September 1984, a quantity of radioactive primary fluid has been circulated through the steam I generation cycle. After the September 1983 occurrence, a small leakage path appeared to remain, on the order of 0.07 gpm, which could not be located even af ter extensive investigating and testing.
There were 199 batch releases from Regenerant Holdup Tanks (RHUT) with the material ultimately released by 46 Retention Basin discharges.
Liquid releases are summarized in Table 2A, and the isotopic contents are detailed in Table 28.
The estimate of the quantity of radioactivity in liquid effluent was determined in the following manner. Samples are routinely collected from each of the RHUT discharges and composited for analysis on a monthly basis. These monthly composites are then sent to the District's environmental monitoring contractor for strontium and alpha analysis.
I The District requested that these samples also be analyzed for gamma emitting radionuclides to better estimate the 1985 liquid effluent release. For those months that did not have adequate volume for gamma spectral analysis or were contaminated, a weighted average LLD (Lower Limits of Detection) value for the monthly RHUT discharges was calculated. The weighting was based upon the RHUT discharge volumes.
The weighted average LLD would then be an upper bound estimate of the I monthly radioactive 11guld effluent. If the monthly composite sample analysis results in a higher estimate of radioactive liquid effluent than the individual RHUT sample analysis performed onsite, the higher values are recorded and reported.
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO ,
The quantities of radioactive liquid effluent in Table 2A and Table 2B are the results from the monthly composite of the RHUT discharges analyzed by the District's environmental monitoring contractor and weighted average LLD. The District's environmental monitoring contractor's LLDs are much lower than the values reported in Table 2C which are typical of the District's on site LLD capabilities.
D. SOLID HASTE There were 20 shipments of radioactive wastes to the Hanford Burial Site between January 1 and June 30, 1985. These consisted of 200 ft3 containers of solidified liquid waste, primary and low activity secondary I resins, incorporated into concrete under an approved Process Control m Program and shipped in approved LSA containers. In addition, dry compressible waste and contaminated equipment was shipped in approved LSA containers.
I I
I I
I
l l
l l
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS,1985 I
RANCHO SECO TABLE 1A GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES IST QTR 2ND QTR EST. TOTAL UNITS
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
ERROR %
A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES
- 1. Total Release C1 3.83 E+03 1.57 E+01 2 8.00 E+00
- 2. Average Release Rate C1/sec 4.93 E+02 1.99 E+00
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit Percent 3.74 E+00 1.31 E-02 B. IODINES
- 1. Total I-131 C1 3.80 E-03 4.62 E-04 2 7.00 E+00 -
- 2. Average Release Rate pC1/sec 4.89 E-04 5.87 E-05 Percent of Technical 3.
Specification Limit Percent 8.98 E-03 1.07 E-03 C. PARTICULATES '
t
- 1. Particulates -
(>8 days) C1 1.26 E-04 4.14 E-04 2 8.00 E+00 N
- 2. Average Release Rate pCi/sec 1.63 E-05 5.26 E-05
- 3. Percent of Technical Specifications Limit Percent 9.92 E-05 2.86 E-04
- 4. Gross Alpha Radioactivity C1 6.61 E-06 9.31 E-08 1 3.00 E+01 D. TRITIUM '
- 1. Total Release C1 1.02 E+01 1.13 E+01 2 7.00 E 700
- 2. Average Release Rate pC1/sec 1.31 E+00 1.44 E+00
- 3. Percent of Technical Specification Limit Percent 1.30 E-02 1.43 E-02
\
t s
- 4.
1 SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO P
TABLE 1E - ,
GASEOUS EFFLUENTS - RADIATION DOSES SITE BOUNDARY first Second Unit Quarter __, Quarter i
A. Noble Gas '
(1) (2)
- 1. a. Gamma Air dose mrad 1.09,E+db 3.56 E-03 4
- b. Percent Tech. Spec. Limit % 2.18, f.+01 7.12 E-02 s ,t
- 2. a. Beta air dose , mrad 2.68 E+00 1.26 E-02
- b. Percent Tech. Spec. Limit "% 2.63 E+01 1.26 E-01
- 3. a. Total Body mrem 6.63 E-01 2.26 E-02
- b. Percent hch. Spec. Limit -
% NA NA
- 4. a. Skin ( 1 I mrem 1.80 E+00 3.12 E-02 l
- b. Percent , Tech. Spic, '
Limit % i 2.40 E+01 4.16 E-01
. s
" ^
[,' B. Tritium, Iodine, Particulate MAXIMUM RECEPT 0R i f, s .
k* T.
Unrestricted areas -
(3) (4) s ,All Pathway?,
. tx. ; <
- r. .
'c 1. I .g 9 @rgan%ose mrem 8.75 E-01 l'.75 E-01 C,,, ,
i .
. t. ' Percept Te:h. Sps:. Limi t % 1.1 % 01 s 2.33 E+00 n ,
, c-3 ' '
C. Direct 1.adiatiq , -
I , 3r~0
,, s
, 1. a. Dose - mee:n 3.40 E+ Gin 4.76 E+01 3, rn$ . .~
\'
? ;'
- b. Perceit Tech. Spec. Limit % NA NA 1, '. -
NOTE: The above C'Alculatte/is were performed in accordanc'e with' the ODCM (1) West secter site D3hnd$';- .
(2) North northeast sector D te boundry '
\
(3) Southwest sector, 1219 meters, adult skin' i(
.z (4) East northeast sector, 1128 meters, teenager thyrold I m
. ~.. :
- 1. l
(
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I
RANCHO SECO TABLE 2A RADI0 ACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES IST QTR 2ND QTR EST. TOTAL UNITS
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
ERROR %
A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES s 1. Total Release (not C1 2.72 E-03 1.55 E-03 ~+ 7.00 E+00
\s including tritium, gases, alpha)
- 2. Average diluted C1/sec 7.39 E-10 8.83 E-10 concentration
/( during period
- 3. , Percent of Technical Percent 1.30 E-02 5.38 E-03 I , Specification limit B. ErtITIG$
- 1. Total Release C1 5.60 E+01 1.22 E+01 2 8.00 E+00 k 2. Av'eracie diluted pC)/ml 1.52 E-05 6.92 E-06
,concencration during 3,,
I, period s 3. Percent of Technical Percent 5.07 E-01 2.31 E-01
,, Specification limit
+ ,s ,
'O. f?ISNOLVEDAWD E'ITRAINED GASES
- l. Total Release C1 N/A - No releases containing detectable dissolved or entrained
'. /\ 2. Ater ge diluted pCl/ml gases were made in the period of I
s concentration January through June 1985 during period s
- 3. Percent of Technical Percent S,ecification 1fatt I>
i
, l
'y ::
t 3 ,
Istr ,
r, g,
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE 2A - (Continued)
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENTS - SUMMATION OF ALL RELEASES IST QTR 2ND OTR EST. TOTAL UNITS
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
ERROR 7.
D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY
- 1. Total Release C1 N/A - No releases containing detectable alpha radioactivity were l made in the period of January a through June 1985.
E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED liters 3.18E+07 9.32E+06 1 5.20 E+00 F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD OF RADIOACTIVE LIQUID RELEASES liters 3.68E+09 1.75E+09 t 1.30 E+00 I
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I RANCHO SECO TABLE 28 AVERAGE QUARTERLY RESULTS RADI0 ACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENTS - BATCH MODE IST QTR 2ND QTR NUCLIDES RELEASED UNIT
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
Strontium-89 Ci < LLD < LLD Strontium-90 C1 < LLD < LLD Cesium-134 C1 5.02 E-04 4.20 E-04 I Cesium-137 Iodine-131 Cobalt-58 C1 Ci C1 1.34 E-03 9.92 E-05 3.05 E-05 8.28 E-04
< LLD
< LLD Cobalt-60 Ci < LLD i.28 E-04 Iron-59 Ci < LLD < LLD Zinc-65 Ci < LLD < LLD Manganese-54 C1 < LLD < LLD I Chromium-51 Zirconium-Niobium-95 Molybdenum-99 Ci C1 Ci
< LLD
< LLD
< LLD
< LLD
< LLD
< LLD Technetium-99m C1 < LLD < LLD Barium-Lanthanum-140 Ci < LLD < LLD Cerium-141 Ci < LLD < LLD Cesium-136 Ci < LLD < LLD I Sodium-24 Iodine-133 Tritium (H-3)
C1 C1 Cl
< LLD
< LLD 5.60 E+01
< LLD
< LLD 1.22 E+01 Xenon-133 Ci < LLD < LLD Xenon-135 C1 < LLD < LLD S11ver-110m Ci 6.62 E-05 < LLD Niobium-97 C1 7.11 E-05 < LLD I Antimony-124 Antimony-125 Unidentified C1 C1 C1 3.35 E-04 2.74 E-04
< LLD 1.70 E-04 Total for period (above) C1 5.60 E+01 1.22 E+01 LLD - Lower Limit of Detectior of the District's environmental monitoring contractor lI SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I RANCHO SECO TABLE 20 LIQUID EFFLUENTS-RADIATION DOSES TO THE MAXIMUM HYPOTHETICAL INDIVIDUAL I First Second Unit Quarter Quarter A.
- 1. Total body dose (Adult) mrem 1.03 E+00 1.22 E+00
- 2. Percent of Technical Specification % 6.87 E+01 8.13 E+01 Limits B.
- 1. Limiting organ dose (child liver) mrem 2.43 E+00 2.99 E+00
- 2. Percent of Technical Spec'ification % 4.86 E+01 5.98 E+01 Limits I
I I
I I -"-
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO SECTION G. PERCENT OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICAION LIMITS Gaseous Effluents - Applicable Limits The percent of Technical Specification Limits, tabulated in Table 1A, was determined by calculation of the following parameters:
- 1. TSL = (Average Release Rate) (X/0) (100)
MPCeff Where: Average Release Rate = total Curles released in each category and each quarter, divided by the seconds in a quarter; this is the va.. in Parts A.2, B.2, C.2 and D.2 of Table \, converted to microcuries.
X/Q = the annual average atmospheric dispersion defined I the CDCM, Rev. 3. (sec/m1)
Tritium value 1.986E-05 sec/m3 Nob'e gas value 1.981E-05 sec/m3 Iodine and particulate value 1.837E-05 sec/m3 The The MPCeff is defined as:
1 n Fj I
11 MPCI Where: Fj - fractional abundance of the ith radionuclide obtained by dividing the activity in curies for each radionuclide, C 1 , by the sum of all such activities, C T-n- total number of radionuclides identified MPCj - MPC of the ith radionuclide (10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1)
I The percent of Technical Specification Limits tabulated in Table lE is the percent of the applicable dose limits of Table 1.
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO SECTION G. PERCENT OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICAION LIMITS Liquid Effluents - Applicable Limits The percent of Technical Specification Limit, tabulated in Table 2A, was determined by calculatior of the following parameter:
- 1. TSL = (Average Diluted Concentration) (100)
MPCeff Where: Average Diluted Concentration - total curies released in each I
category and each quarter, converted to microcuries, divided by the total volume released (Part F in Table 2A) converted to milliliters. This number is the value in part A.2, B.2 and C.2 of Table 2A.
The The MPCerg is defined in the ODCM, Rev 1 as:
n pg I
I 1-1 MPCj Where: Fj = fractional abundance of the ith radionuclide obtained by g dividing the activity in curies for each radionuclide, g Cj, by the sum of all such activities, CT-n- total number of radionuclides identified MPCj = MPC of the ith radionuclide (10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2)
The percent of Technical Specification Limit tabulated in Table 2D is the percent of the applicable cose limits of Table 1.
4 I
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985
. RANCHO SECO I
SECTION H. ESTIMATION OF ERROR The estimate of error is based on combination of the following error estimates:
A. Airborne
- 1. counting error
- 2. calibration error of exhaust fans
- 3. sample train flow rate meter error
- 4. process monitor flow rate setpoint error I 5. charcoal cartridge efficiency
- 6. tritium bubbler collection efficiency
- 7. loss due o handling (for particulates)
- 8. Waste Gas Decay Tank (HGDT) pressure gauge and flow rate meter errors B. Liquid I 1.
2.
3.
counting error Regenerant Hold Up Tank (RHUT) release volume error retention basin dilution error
- 4. retention basin outlet flow error
- 5. flow rate error of discharge canal The following error estimates were considered, found to be negligible, and therefore were not considered in the error analysis:
- 1. Marinelli flask volume
- 2. sample mixing
- 3. particulate filter loss
- 4. loss due to handling for iodine
- 5. composite aliquots for 11gulds Error estimates for anisokinetic sampling and airborne particulate plateout in monitor sample lines were not included because no plant data exist on the subject. However, this does not necessarily mean the errors are negligible.
The methods for establishing error estimates included communication with District health physics / chemistry personnel, review of applicable station I procedures, inspection of sampling equipment, review of previous District error analysis data, engineering estimates, statistical applications, literature reviews, and use of calibration set points data.
In determining the overall error in a release, error at one standard deviation and a bias were calculated. The error consists of random or indeterminate errors. Bias is influenced primarily by determinate errors which introduce a I constant error into the data.
The error analysis was applied to the following release pathways.
I I
l SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO SECTION H. ESTIMATION OF ERROR
- 1. Auxiliary Building Vent (see note)
- a. fission and activation ga:es
- b. iodines
- c. particulates
- d. tritium
- 2. Haste Gas Decay Tank (WGDT)
- a. fission and activation gases
- b. tritium
- 3. Reactor Building Vent
- a. fission and activation gases a b.
c.
todines particulates g
- o. tritium
- 4. Liquid Releases Includes the total error analysis for.the RHUT to retention basin to discharge canal flow path.
It should be noted that the error analysis for lodines and particulates that are released through the reactor building vent includes exhaust fan calibration error, not containment volume error. This is because lodines and particulates are vented on a continuous basis by the exhaust fan via a pre-filter, HEPA filter and charcoal cartridge. Also, error analysis for g fission and activation gases and tritium that are released through the reactor ]
building vent includes containment volume error, not exhaust fan calibration error. This is because fission and activation gases and tritium are released is a function of containment volume.
Note: includes releases from the condenser air ejector, gland seai exhaust, and iodines and particulates from the WGDT.
The Radwaste Service Area Vent was not included as a release pathway due to its inoperability.
The error for both airbcrne and liquid releases was determined at one standard deviation from the mean.
I I
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I RANCHO SECO SECTION H. ESTIMATION OF ERROR A. ERROR ANALYSIS FOR AIRBORNE RELEASES
- 1. AUXILIARY BUILDING STACK
- a. Fission and Activation Gases Error 2 (o2 , 7,72 )l/2 3 3.3% calibration error of exhaust fans .
i 6.9% process monitor flow rate setpoint error margin (3.3 2 + 6.92 )l/2 . 7,7 o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100
- b. Iodine Error 2 1 (o2 + 3.8 )1/2 1 3.3% calibration error of exhaust fans 1 1.9% process monitor flow rate setpoint error margin (3.3 2 . 1,92)l/2 - 3.8 o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100 Bias: -5% not collected by charcoal cartridge
- c. Particulates Error 2 (o2 + 3.82)1/2 Error is same as Iodine (auxiliary stack)
I Bias: -51 handling loss
- d. Tritium Error 2 (o2 + 22)1/2 2 2% sample flow rate meter reading error o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100 Blas: +5% collection efficiency *
- Available literature indicates the collection loss is approximately 5% for fritted bubblers of the type used at Rancho Seco. Rancho Seco uses a I collection efficiency of 90%. Therefore, the actual bias is +5%.
1
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO SECTION H. ESTIMATION OF ERROR
- 2. WASTE GAS DECAY TANK
- a. Fission and Activation Gases Error 2 (o2 + 2.82)1/2 ,
t 2% calibration and reading error of HGDT pressure gauge i 2% calibration and reading error of WGDT flow rate meter (2 2 + 22 )1/2 - 2.8 o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100
- b. Tritium Error 3 (o2 + 2.82)1/2 2% reading error of sample flow rate meter i 2% reading and calibration error of WGDT flow rate meter (2 2 + 22 )l/2 - 2.8 o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100 Blas: +5% collection efficiency error (see auxiliary building vent tritium analysis)
- 3. REACTOR BUILDING VENT
- a. Fission and Activation Gases Error 2 (o2 + 6.52 )l/2 2 5% containment volume error 3 4.2% process monitor flow rate setpoint error margin (5 2 + 4.22 >1/2 - 6.5 o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100 Bias: -5% incomplete purge A Purge is a batch removal of Reactor Building air by the Reactor Building purge exhaust fan which discharges to the vent. The -5% bias was chosen as a reasonable value for representing an estimate of incomplete purge.
-27a-
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I RANCHO SECO SECTION H. ESTIMATION OF ERROR
- b. Iodines Error 2 (o2 + 3.62)1/2 1 3.3% calibration error of exhaust fans 2 1.4% process monitor flow rate setpoint error margin (3.3 2 . 1,4 2 )l/2 - 3.6 o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100 Blas: -5% not collected by charcoal
- c. Particulates Error + (o2 + 3.62)1/2 Error is same as for Iodines (Reactor Building)
Blas: -5% handling loss
- d. Tritium Error 2 (o2 + 5.42)1/2 1 5% containment volume error i 2% flow rate meter error (5 2 + 22 )l/2 - 5.4 o counting error - (gross counts)-1/2 x 100 Blas: +5% collection efficiency (see auxiliary building vent tritium analysis)
-5% incomp'ete purge B. ERROR ANALYSIS FOR LIQUID RELEASES l 1. Liquid Effluent Release Error 3 (o2 + 5.42)1/2 ll a. RHUT 1 5% RHUT Volume
! o counting error - (gross counts)-l/2 x 100 l
l l
1 l
-27b-
Il SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO .
SECTION H. ESTIMATION OF ERROR
- b. Retention Basin i 17. inlet dilution volume error i 17. outlet flow error
- c. Dilution Flow i 1.37. discharge canal flow rate error Total Error (52.12.1 2 + 1.32 )1/2 - 5.4 I
I I
1 I
l l
i
-27c-l
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 JANCHO SECO SECTION I. 10 CFR 50 APPENDIX I REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
Quarterly Maximum Dose to an Individual I TABLE 1 Dose (millirems)
SOURCE 1st Q 2nd Q Liquid Effluents 1) 1.03E+00 2) 1.22E+00 HHOLE BODY ORGAN 3) 2.43E+00 4) 2.99E+00 Airbornes Effluents 5) 8.78E-01 6) 1.75E-01 TRITIUM, 10 DINES, and PARTICULATES I Noble Gasses
- GAMMA
- 7) 1.09E+00 8) 3.56E-03 BETA 9) 2.68E+00 10) 1.26E-02 Direct Radiation 11) 3.48E+01 12) 4.76E+01 Note Items 1 through 10 were calculated in accordance with the ODCM.
Items 11 and 12 are found in Attachment 7 of this report.
Noble gas doses due to airborne effluents are in units of mrad reflecting I tne air dose.
I I - '-
i I
l SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO SECTION I. 10 CFR 50 APPENDIX I REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
Percent of Technical Specification Limits for Table 1 of Section I.
- TABLE 2 Percent (7.)
SOURCE ist Q 2nd Q i
Liquid Effluents 6.87E+01 8.13E+01 HHOLE B00Y ORGAN 4.86E+01 5.98E+01 Airbornes Effluents 1.17E+01 2.33E+00 TRITIUM, 10 DINES, and PARTICULATES I
Noble Gasses 2.18E+01 7.12E-02 GAMMA BETA 2.68E+01 1.26E-01 Direct Radiation N/A N/A I
I I
i SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I RANCHO SECO
]
SECTION K. CONCLUSIONS Gaseous effluent releases totaled 3.88E+03 curies with Xe-133 937. of the total for Quarters 1 and 2 combined.
The radiation doses from gaseous releases are:
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter I (a) gamma air dose at the site boundary 1.09 mrad 3.56E-03 mrad (b) beta air dose 2.68 mrad 1.26E-02 mrad at tne site boundary (c) organ dose at 8.78E-01 mrem 1.75E-01 mrem the nearest receptor.
Liquid effluent releases totaled 6.82E+01 curies with tritium 99.997 of the total.
The radiation doses from liquid releases are: (a) total body: first I quarter 1.03 mrem and second quarter 1.22 mrem, (b) limiting organ:
first quarter 2.43 mrem and second quarter 2.99 mrem.
The radioactive releases and resulting doses generated were below the Technical Specification Limits for both gaseous and liquid effluents.
I E
I I
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 I RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 1, 1985 I -
MAX:MCM ADULT ( .vREM )
PATHWAY SKIN SCt1E LIVER T.30CY THYRCID X:ONEY LL'NG G -LLI FI3H 0.0 4.52E-01 7.34E-01 5.24E-01 1.72E-02 2.53E-01 9.242-02 2.60E-02 I INVER*
WATER SHORE SW M 0.0 0.0 9.24E-04 1.83E-03 1.40E-03 4.00E-04 8.47E-04 5.18E-04 6. 25-04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.67E-02 3.15E-02 3.15E-02 3.15E-02 3.15E-02 3.15E-02 3.15E-02 3.15E 0.0 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 VEG 0.0 1.06E-01 3.66E-01 3.18E-01 2.12E-01 2.56E-01 2.19E-01 2.24E-01 MILK 0.0 4.35E-02 1.23E-01 1.03E-01 6.24E-02 7.75E-02 6.21E-02 6.19E-02 MEAT 0.0 5.36E-03 5.09E-02 4.86E-02 4.28E-02 4.53E-02 4.35E-02 4.42E-02
- OTAL 3.67E-02 6.39E-01 1.30E+00 1.03E+00 3.66E-01 6.64E-01 4.49E-01 3.88E-01 I
l I
I I
Attachment 2 Page 1 of 7
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 1, 1985 MAMMUM TIENAGER (MREM)
I PATH ~ DAY SKIN SONE L VER T. BODY THYROID KIONEY LONG GI-LLI EISH 0.0 3.77E-01 5.94E-01 2.34E-01 1.10E-02 2.03E-01 9.29E-02 1.56E-02
- NVERT 0.0 1.29E-03 2.35E-03 1.13E-03 4.13E-04 1.02E-03 6.15E-04 5.94E-04 WATIR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SHORE 3.67E-03 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 SW:M 0.0 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.0SE-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 VEG 0.0 1.78E-01 5.17E-01 3.50E-01 2.62E-01 3.36E-01 2.81E-01 2.72E-01 MILK 0.0 7.82E-02 1.91E-01 1.17E-01 8.36E-02 1.11E-01 8.65Z-02 7.99E-02 MEAT 0.0 4.41E-03 3.21E-02 2.80E-02 2.56E-02 2.76E-02 2.62E-02 2.63E-02 TOTAL 3.67E-03 6.42E-01 1.34E+00 7.33E-01 3.86E-01 6.82E-01 4.80E-01 3.98E-01 I
I I
I I
Attachment 2 Page 2 of 7
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO I
TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LICCID - QUARTER 1, 1985 MAXIMUM CHILD (MREM)
PA EWAY SKIN SONE LIVER T.BCDY THYROID KIONEY LUNG GI-LLI FISH 0.0 1.09E+00 1.22E+00 2.16E-01 2.28E-02 4.00E-01 1.53E-01 2.15E-02 INVERT 0.0 3.72E-03 4.78E-03 1.37E-03 3.18E-04 2.00E-03 1.16E-03 8.76E-04 WATER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SHORE 5.13E-04 4.41E-04 4.41E-04 4.41E-04 4.41E-04 4.41I-04 4.41E-04 4.41E-04 SWIM 0.0 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.08 E-05 3.0 8E-0 5 3.0 9E-0 5 3.08E-0 5 3.08E-0 5 I VEG MILK MEAT 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.25E-01 8.49E-01 4.65E-01 4.21E-01 5.36E-01 4.43E-01 4.07E-01 1.87E-01 3.16E-01 1.46E-01 1.37E-01 1.78E-01 1.36E-01 1.18E-01 8.0$E-03 3.94E-02 3.215-02 3.10E-02 3.34E-02 3.17E-02 3.11E-02 TOTAL 5.13E-04 1.71E+00 2.43E+00 8.61E-01 6.13E-01 1.15E*00 7.65E-01 5.79E-01 I
I I
I I
Attachment 2 Page 3 of 7 I
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985
. RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 1, 1985 AVERAGE AOULT (MRE4)
PATHWAY SKIN SCNE L:VER T.3CDY THYRCID K!ONEY :.UNG GI-LLI -
FISH 0.0 8.912-05 1.45E-04 1.03E-04 3.30E-06 4.99E-05 1.82E-05 5.13E-06 INVERT 0.0 9.23E-07 1.83E-06 1.40E-06 3.96E-07 8.46E-07 5.'8E-07 6.llE-0 DRINK 0.0 3.45E-06 1.51E-04 1.49E-04 1.49E-04 1.47E-04 1.46E-04 1.465-04 SHCRE 3.04E-07 2.61E-07 2.61E-07 2.61E-07 2.61E-07 2.61E-07 2.61E-07 2.61E-07 SWIM 0.0 2.54E-09 2.54E-03 2.54E-09 2.54E-09 2.54E-09 2.54E-09 2.54E-09 30ATING 0.0 1.27E-09 1.27E-09 1.27E-09 1.27E-09 1.27E-09 1.272-09 1.27E-09 VEGE 0.0 3.90E-05 1.35E-04 1.17E-04 7.43E-05 9.48E-05 8.14E-05 8.07E-05 L VIGE 0.0 7.64E-06 2.58E-05 2.24E-05 1.61E-05 1.79E-05 1.53E-05 1.57E-05 MILK 0.0 1.60E-05 4.54E-05 3.80E-05 2.26E-05 2.86E-05 2.29E-05 2.28E-05 MEAT 0.0 4.91E-06 4.67E-05 4.44E-05 3.93E-05 4.15E-05 3.98E-05 4.05E-05 TCTAL 3.04E-07 1.61E-04 5.52E-04 4.76E-04 3.05E-04 3.81E-04 3.24E-04 3.12E-04 I
I I
I I
Attachment 2 Page 4 of 7
E SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 1, 1985 AVERAGE TEENAGER (MREM)
I PATHWAY SKIN SONE LIVER T.SODY THYROID K:DNEY LUNG GI-LL:
FISH 3.0 9.34E-05 1.47E-04 5.79E-05 2.66E-06 5.02E-05 2.05E-05 3.86E-06
!!NERT 0.0 9.64E-07 1.76E-06 8.47E-07 3.06E-07 7.67E-07 4.61E-07 4.45E-0 DRINK 0.0 3.38E-06 1.08E-04 1.05E-04 1.06E-04 1.05E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 SHCRE 1.72E-06 1.48E-06 1.48E-06 1.48E-06 1.48E-06 1.48E-06 1.48E-06 1.48E-06 S* DIM 0.0 1.44E-08 1.44E-08 1.44E-08 1.44E-08 1.44E-08'i.44E-08 1.44E-08 SCATING 0.0 7.20E-09 7.20E-09 7.20E-09 7.20E-09 7.20E-09 ?.20E-09 7.20E-09 I VICE MILK MEAT 0.0 L VIGE 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.85E-05 2.002-04 1.35E-04 9.50E-05 1.30E-04 1.09E-04 1.03E-04 7.08E-06 2.01E-05 1.35E-05 1.12E-05 1.30E-05 1.08E-05 1.05E-05 4.06E-05 9.91E-05 6.08E-05 4.23E-05 5.76E-05 4.49E-05 4.14E-05 4.25E-06 3.09E-05 2.69E-05 2.47E-05 2.66E-05 2.53E-05 2.54E-05 TOTAL 1.72E-06 2.19E-04 6.09E-04 4.01E-04 2.83E-04 3.84E-04 3.16E-04 2.90E-04 I
E lI 1
l l
l l
l l
Attachment 2 Page 5 of 7
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 1,1985 AVERAGE CHILD IMREM)
PATHWAY SKIN 3CNE LIVER T.30DY THYROID KIONEY L"NG GI-LLI FISH 0.0 1.14E-04 1.27E-04 2.26E-05 2.32E-06 4.19E-05 1.60E-05 2.27E-06 INVERT 0.0 1.23E-06 1.58E-06 4.53E-07 2.66E-07 6.59E-07 3.82E-07 2.83E-0 DRINK 0.0 9.77E-06 2.08E-04 1.99E-04 2. 0 4 E -04 2.01E-04 1.99E-04 1.38E-04 SHCRE 3.48E-07 2.99E-07 2.99E-07 2.99E-07 2.39E-G/ 2.99E-07 2.39E-07 2.S9E-07 SWIM 0.0 2.91E-09 2.91E-09 2.91E-03 2.91E-09 2.91E-09 2.91E-09 2.91E-03 30ATING 0.0 1.46E-09 1.46E-09 1.46E-09 1.46E-09 1.46E-09 1.46E-09 1.46E-09 VIGE 0.0 1.66E-04 3.32E-04 1.82E-04 1.52E-04 2.09E-04 1.73E-04 1.57E-04 L VEGE 0.0 1.02E-05 2.00E-05 1.08E-05 1.11E-05 1.25E-05 1.03E-05 3.46E-06 MILK 0.0 9.97E-05 1.69E-04 7.82E-05 7.12E-05 9.49E-05 7.26E-05 6.31E-05 MEAT 0.0 7.70E-06 3.77E-05 3.07E-05 2.96E-05 3.21E-05 3.04E-05 2.99E-05 TOTAL 3.48E-07 4.10E-04 8.96E-04 5.25E-04 4.71E-04 5.92E-04 5.02E-04 4.60E-04 I
I l
l l
1 I
l l
l l
l I
l Attachment 2 Page 6 of 7 L
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 1, 1985 GENERA
- PUBLIC MAN-REM I PATHWAY SKIN 3CNE LIVER !.LODY THYROID K:DNEY I.UNG G I - T., *. I FISH 0.0 1.84E-02 2.77E-02 1.64E-02 5.30E-04 9.47E-03 3.53E-03 3.74E-04 INVER 0.0 1.92E-04 3.46E-04 2.28E-04 6.76E-05 1.57E-04 9.51E-05 1.04E-04 DRINK 0.0 9.llE-04 3.11E-02 3.05E-02 3.06E-02 3.03E-02 3.00E-02 3.00E-02 SHORE 9.32E-05 0.0 0.0 8.00E-05 8.00E-05 0.0 0.0 0.0 SWIM 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.79E-07 7.79E-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 I
BOATING 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.90E-07 3.90E-07 0.0 0.0 0.0 VEGE 0.0 1.30E-02 3.54E-02 2.61E-02 1.81E-02 2.38E-02 2.01E-02 1.93E-02
- VEGE 0.0 1.60E-03 4.81E-03 3.84E-03 2.92E-03 3.262-03 2.76E-03 2.78E-03 MI:.X 0.0 6.73E-03 1.46E-02 9.50E-03 6.66E-03 8.70E-03 6.82E-03 6.39E-03 MEAT 0.0 1.06E-03 8.63E-03 7.98E-03 7.15E-03 7.61E-03 7.28E-03 7.35E-03 TOTAI, 9.32E-05 4.19E-02 1.23E-01 9.46E-02 6.61E-02 8.33E-02 7.06E-02 6.6aE-02 I
I I
I I
Attachment 2 Page 7 of 7
SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 2,1985 MAX MCM ADULT (MREM)
PATHWAY SKIN BONE LIVER T.3CDY THYROID KIONEY IUNG GI ~ * :
~
FISH 0.3 6.40E-01 1.06E+00 7.69E-01 5.70E-03 3.58E-01 1.23Z-01 2.67E-02 INVERT 00 1.312-03 2.33E-03 1.74E-03 1.63E-04 9.81E-04 4.02E-04 3.54E-04 WATER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SHCRI 6.20E-02 5.31E-02 5.31E-02 5.31E-02 5.31E-02 5.31E-02 5.31E-02 5.31E-02 SWIM 0.0 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 I VEG M*LK MEAT 0.C 0.0 0.0 1.48E-01 3.34E-01 2.67E-01 9.23E-02 1.73E-01 1.19E-01 1.10E-01 6.13E-0 2 1. 26E-01 9. 74E-0 2 2. 51E-0 2 5. 865-02 3. 6 2E-0 2 2.75E-0 2 7.52E-03 3.!?E-02 2.96E-02 1.965-02 2.37E-02 2.10E-02 2.14E-02 TOTAL 6.20E-02 9.llE-01 1.61E*00 1.22E+00 1.96E-01 6.67E-01 3.53E-01 2.39E-01 I
I I
I Attachment 3 Page 1 of 7
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 2, 1985 MAXIMUM TEENAGER (MREM)
PATHWAT SKIN 3CNE LIVER T.30DY THTROID K:DNEY LCNG GI-LLI T SH 0.0 5.33E-01 8.62E-01 3.43E-01 3.45E-03 2.98E-01 1.13E-01 1.5SE-02 INVERT 0.0 1.81E-03 3.10E-03 1.34E-03 1.64E-04 1.13E-03 5.38E-04 3.41E-04 WATER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SHCRE 6.20E-03 5.31E-03 5.31E-03 5.315-03 5.31E-03 5.31E-03 5.31E-03 5.31E-03 SWIM 0.0 3.72E-05 3.92E-05 3.32E-05 3.32E-05 3.92E-05 3.325-05 3.72E-05 VEG 0.0 2.49E-01 5.10E-01 2.70E-01 1.13E-01 2.44E-01 1.64E-01 1.33E-01 MILK 0.0 1.10E-01 2.08E-01 1.02E-01 3.27E-02 9.09E-02 5.52E-02 3.57E-02 MEAT 0.0 6.17E-03 2.15E-02 1.57E-02 1.17E-02 1.49E-02 1.29E-02 1.27E-02 TOTAL 6.20E-03 9.05E-01 1.61E+00 7.37E-01 1.66E-01 6.445-01 3.51E-01 2.03E-01 I
I I
I Attachment 3 Page 2 of 7
E SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO I
~
TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 2,1985 MAXIMCM CHILD (MREM)
I PATHWAY SKIN 3CNE LIVER T.9 COY THYROID KIENEY LCMG G -LL FISH 0.0 1.54E+00 1.76E*00 3.08E-01 6.61E-03 5.67E-01 2.08E-01 1.76E-02 lNVERT 0.0 5.23E-03 6.29E-03 1.40E-03 3.15E-04 2.22E-03 1.00E-03 4.61E-04 WATER 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SHCRI 8.67E-04 7.43E-04 7.43E-04 7.43E-04 7.43E-04 7.43E-04 7.43E-04 7.43E-04 SWIM 0.0 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 3.92E-05 VEG 0.0 5.94E-01 8.48E-01 2.9fE-01 1.78E-01 3.92E-01 2.56E-01 1.33E-01 I MILK MEAT TOTAL 0.0 0.0 2.62E-01 3.48E-01 1.02E-01 5.16E-02 1.46E-01 8.57E-02 5.38E-02 1.12E-02 2.58E-02 1.65E-02 1.41:'-02 1.82E-02 1.56E-02 1.46E-02
?.67E-04 2.41E*00 2.99E+00 7.25E-01 2.51E-01 *.13E*00 5.57E-01 2.80E-01 I
I i
E i
l E
I Attachment 3 Page 3 of 7 I
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 2, 1985 I
A7ERAGE ADULT (MREM)
PATHWAY SKIN SONE LIVER T.300Y THYROID K*DNEY ' Ut;G GI-LL:
I' S H 0.0 1.26E-03 2.10E-03 1.52E-03 1.12E-05 7.06E-04 2.42E-04 5.26E-05 INVERT 0.0 1.31E-05 2.33E-05 1.74E-05 1.63E-06 8.82E-06 4.02E-06 3.54E-0 ORINK 0.0 4.8 5E-0 5 7. 50E-0 4 7. 28 E-0 4 6.70E-0 4 6. 36 E-0 4 6.79E-04 6.76E-04 SHORE 5.14E-06 4.40E-06 4.40E-06 4.40E-06 4.40E-06 4.40E-06 4.40E-06 4.40E-06 SW M 0.0 3.25E-08 3.25E-08 3.25E-08 3.2SE-08 3.25E-08 3.25E-08 3.25E-08 BOATING 0.0 1.63E-08 1.63E-38 1.63E-08 1.63I-08 1.63E-08 1.63E-08 1.63E-08 VEGE 0.0 5.35E-04 1.20E-03 9.62E-04 3.35Z-04 6.2SE-04 4.33E-04 3.99E-04
- VIGE 0.0 9.06E-05 2.03E-04 1.61E-04 5.44E-05 1.04E-04 7.08E-05 6.53E-05 MI* K 0.0 2.18E-04 4.47E-04 3.47E-04 8.92E-05 2.09E-04 1.295-04 9.77E-05 MEAT 0.0 6.53E-05 2.77E-04 2.48E-04 1.70E-04 2.06E-04 1.82E-04 1.86E-04 TOTAL 5.14E-06 2.24E-03 5.00E-03 3.79E-03 1.34E-03 2.56E-03 1.74E-03 1.48E-03 I
I I
I I
Attachment 3 Page 4 of 7
I' SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO I TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 2, 1985 AVERAGE *EENAGER (MREM)
PATE*dA7 SK!N BONE LIVER T. BODY THYROID K DNEY L**NG G I-C.L .
7:SH 0.0 1.32E-03 2.13E-03 8.48E-04 8.55E-06 7.13E-04 2.80E-04 3.90E-05 INVERT 0.0 1.36E-05 2.32E-05 1.00E-05 1.23E-06 8.49E-06 4.04E-06 2.56E-0 DRINK 0.0 4.73E-05 5.51E-04 5.05E-04 4.75E-04 5.00E-04 4.85E-04 4.79E-04 SHORI 2.91E-05 2.49E-05 2.49E-05 2.49E-05 2.49E-05 2.49E-05 2.49E-05 2.49E-05 S4:M 0.0 1.84E-07 1.84E-07 1.84E-07 1.84E-07 1.84E-07 1.84E-07 1.84E-07 BCATING 0.0 9.21E-08 9.21E-08 9.21E-08 9.21E-08 9.215-08 9.21E-08 9.215-08 7EGE 9.41E-04 1.92E-03 1.01E-03 4.28E-04 9.23E-04 6.21E-04 5.02E-04 I
0.0 L VIGE 0.0 8.41E-05 1.71E-04 8.952-05 3.66E-05 8.08E-05 5.39E-05 4.35E-05 MILK 0.0 5.53E-04 1.05E-03 5.12E-04 1.64E-04 4.56E-04 2.77E-04 1.79E-04 XEAT 0.0 5.62E-05 1.97E-04 1.43E-04 1.06E-04 1.37E-04 1.18E-04 1.16E-04 TOTAL 2.91E-05 3.04E-03 6.07E-03 3.14E-03 1.24E-03 2.85E-03 1.86E-03 1.39E-03 I
E E
I l
i 1
Attachment 3 Page 5 of 7 iI 1
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 2, 1985 AVERAGE CHILD (MREM)
PATH' DAY SKIM SONE LIVER T.3CDT THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI *. LI EISH 0.0 1.61E-03 1.84E-03 3.23E-04 6.93E-06 5.94E-04 2.18E-04 1.84E-05 INVERT 0.0 1.73E-05 2.08E-05 4.61E-06 1.04E-06 7.33E-06 3.30E-06 1.52E-0 ORINK 0.0 1.36E-04 1.06E-03 3.37E-04 9.10E-04 9.59E-04 9.28E-04 9.13E-04 SECRE 5.88E-06 5.04E-06 5.04E-06 5.04E-06 5.04E-06 5.04E-06 5.04E-06 5.04E-06 S~ DIM 0.0 3.72I-08 3.72E-08 3.72E-08 3.72E-08 3.72E-08 3.72E-08 3.72E-08 3CATING 0.0 1.86E-08 1.86E-08 1.86E-08 1.86E-08 1.86E-08 1.86E-08 1.86E-08 7EGE 0.0 2.26E-03 3.21E-03 1.13E-03 6.84E-04 1.43E-03 9.80E-04 7.37E-04 L 7EGE 0.0 1.21E-04 1.72E-04 5.92E-05 3.52E-05 7.87E-05 5.11E-05 3.80E-05 MILK 0.0 1.35E-03 1.79E-03 5.28E-04 2.67E-04 7.56E-04 4.44E-04 2.78E-04 MEAT 0.0 1.02E-04 2.43E-04 1.50E-04 1.28E-04 1.65E-04 1.41E-04 1.33E-04 TOTAL 5.88"-06 4.74E-03 7.54E-03 3.59E-03 2.04E-03 4.06E-03 2.77E-03 2.12E-03 I
I I
I I
Attachment 3 Page 6 of 7
I SEMIANNUAL EFFLUENT REPORT IST AND 2ND QUARTERS, 1985 RANCHO SECO TABLE OF RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT - LIQUID - QUARTER 2,1985 I
GENERAL PUBLIC MAN-REM PATH
- DAY 3CNE L VER T. BODY THYROID KIONEY LUNG G:-LL:
FISH 0.0 2.60E-01 4.01E-01 2.40E-01 1.isE-03 1.34E-01 4.72E-02 s.78E-03 INVER 0.0 2.71E-03 4.46E-03 2.78E-03 2.89E-04 1.66E-03 7.60E-04 5.99E-04 ORINK 0.0 1.28E-02 1.56E-01 1.47E-01 1.38E-01 1.44E-Cl 1.40E-01 1.39E-01 SMCRE 1.57E-03 0.0 1.35E-03 1.35E-03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SWIM 0.0 0.0 9.97E-06 9.97E-06 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 SOATING 0.0 0.0 4.98E-06 4.98E-06 0.0 I
0.0 0.0 0.0 VEGE 0.0 VEGE 0.0 1.77E-01 3.28E-01 1.99E-01 8.13E-02 1.62E-01 1.10E-01 9.38E-02 MILK 0.0 1.90E-02 3.86E-02 2.69E-02 9.75E-03 1.93E-02 1.31E-02 1.15E-02 MEAT 0.0 9.14E-02 1.50E-01 7.91E-02 2.58E-02 6.66E-02 4.02E-02 2.77E-02 1.41E-02 5.22E-02 4.35E-02 3.10E-02 3.79E-02 3.34E-02 3.36E-02 TOTAL 1.57E-03 5.77E-01 1.13E+00 7.40E-01 2.88E-01 5.65E-01 3.85E-01 3.15E-01 I
I E
E E
Attachment 3 Page 7 of 7