ML20214F501

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Partially Deleted Statement Re Discrimination Against Contractor Employee for Reporting Const Deficiencies Concerning Case RII-84-A-0156.Confirms Understanding That Ofc of Investigations Currently Interested in Matter
ML20214F501
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/29/1984
From: Lankford J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Vorse J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20214F174 List:
References
FOIA-85-221 NUDOCS 8611250330
Download: ML20214F501 (4)


Text

__

t VV2954 s

IEMBRAIBM FOR:

J. Y. Verse. Director. Office of Investigstfees Atlaeta Field Offlee 1

i FEM:

J. B. LankfordrInvestigattem/A11egattae CaerMeeter SWJECT:

YOGTLE - ALI.EGED DISCRINIMAT!W 0F A CDETRACTOR DFLOYEE FOR REPORTIE CONSTRUCTION KFICIDICIES CASE IW:

RI!44-A-0156 This refers to our meeting this sortise relatig to the above subject.'

The'ecclesare provides the deteils ef the allegatien.

Besed en ser conversatten, it is my understanding that there is as 61 s

interest le this untter at this time. Should the Region's laspectice effort develop addittenal faforuntien dich would be of OI interest, we will so inform you.

(

,s

'T A

J. B. Lankford

Enclosure:

Statement of concerns l

f

\\

(

T T

1 1

B611250330 861120 FOIA PDR PDR FOWLEROS-221 OD PtC f k..................

WINAMEh CATEh

.....u..au...no.

ne ronu m oo. o acu ouo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

~

i.

t'

,~

NOV e3 34 STATEMENT OF CONCERNS In August 1984,

, a Quality Control Inspector employed by Soils and Material Engineers, was told by two other QC inspectors about a bad construction joint on a concrete pour for a slab that was going to rest on top of a wal the pour f.1 in the_ rad _ waste _.b.ui_lding. _The two inspectors who observed

) wanted to reject the joint and require a substance (latent) be removed from the joint to get a bet,ter bond. The QC superintendent. '

because."~ pector, to sign off the pour

, disagreed and got_

the lead ins felt that.1 signed it told him to.

T also felt that

~ ~ ~ ~

~~ j was the with the contractor, Walsh Construction Company.QC sup~ervision was too close craft superintendent on this job. At the request of and

' ' ~

filed a quality concern regarding this matter with the Georgia Power Company (GPC) Quality Concerns Prog ~ ram. ~

~ said GPC investigated the matter including interviews of '

~

and ~ ~~. and found no reason for the concern, said he was satisfied with the results of the GPC review.

said

~~

concern regarding this concrete placement.. another inspector, also wrote a quality About the end of August 1984, ~~

found 9 places on a construction joint that had not been properly prepared.

This pour was also for a floor slab

,for the rad waste building.

told the Walsh contractor superintendent, about this and said that this placement was going.to go no matter what.

called a QC supervisor for GPC.

looked at 2 of the 9 areas and called immediate supervisor,

[

directed the contractor to take a wire brush and roughen up these 2

~ said they didn't bother to look at the other 7 areas.

areas.

~ ~ ~ ~

said each area was about a square foot area which was slick which would prevent a good bond.

said that signed off this pour, said that during this incident he lost his temper with when,

~' said the pour was going no matter what.

told ~

that he was going to write a deviation report on the pour, Quality Concerns Program.

then reported this incident to the GPC explained that after he filed the first quality concern, some of the other inspectors told him that was out to get his job.

Subsequent to filing the quality concerns, feels he has been intimidated, some of which has been subtle. One incident involved

~

, the manager of GPC Quality Control. A truck which looked similiar to a truck owned by company was parked near a backfill area..

.. ' called supervisor and a.sked why

_ had the truck parked down here in the way.

t also said..

. stared at him in an intimidating way.

In another,inci, dent __

was assigned to work overtime at a pour at the cooling tower.

, _ _ _ was the Level 11 inspector assigned over the Level I inspectors the Level I inspectors, C _ __

wrote a memo to E ~_at this pour.One of

' stat.ing that had a bad attitude and had thrown some equipment around.

doing this.

denied f

ep y

y__

10'i 3 3 '2A said he reported the harassment he had received to the GPC Quality Concerns Program. On Thursday af ternoon, 10/04/84 met with GPC representatives to discuss his concerns.

He was told that they had not substantiated his concerns.

said they told him that there was no reason to fear for his job.

went back to his office and was irmediately bE?!b?$ S YbbY $ b hh SUj hhShl h !k e

4 8

e

-