ML20214F501

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Partially Deleted Statement Re Discrimination Against Contractor Employee for Reporting Const Deficiencies Concerning Case RII-84-A-0156.Confirms Understanding That Ofc of Investigations Currently Interested in Matter
ML20214F501
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/29/1984
From: Lankford J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Vorse J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20214F174 List:
References
FOIA-85-221 NUDOCS 8611250330
Download: ML20214F501 (4)


Text

__ - - _ _

t VV2954 s

l IEMBRAIBM FOR: J. Y. Verse. Director. Office of Investigstfees Atlaeta Field Offlee 1

i FEM: J. B. LankfordrInvestigattem/A11egattae CaerMeeter l SWJECT: YOGTLE - ALI.EGED DISCRINIMAT!W 0F A CDETRACTOR DFLOYEE FOR REPORTIE CONSTRUCTION KFICIDICIES CASE IW: RI!44-A-0156 This refers to our meeting this sortise relatig to the above subject.'

The'ecclesare provides the deteils ef the allegatien.

s Besed en ser conversatten, it is my understanding that there is as 61 .

interest le this untter at this time. Should the Region's laspectice effort develop addittenal faforuntien dich would be of OI interest, we will so inform you.

( ,s

. 'T A

J. B. Lankford

Enclosure:

Statement of concerns l

f  :

\

( T T 1 1

B611250330 FOIA 861120 PDR PDR FOWLEROS-221 OD PtC f k .................. ..................... ..................... ... ................. ..................... ..................... .... .........

WINAMEh .................. ..................... .. .................. ..................... ..................... . ................... ... ...........

CATEh .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . ..................... .....u..au...no. . . . . . " * ' . . " " * . " . " * " * " " " * * " * " * * " " * " " "

  • ne ronu m oo. o acu ouo OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

- _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ ~ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ , . _._.__ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _

i.

t'

,~ -

' NOV e3 34 l STATEMENT OF CONCERNS In August 1984,

, a Quality Control Inspector employed by Soils and Material Engineers, was told by two other QC inspectors about a bad construction top of a wal joint on a concrete pour for a slab that was going to rest on the pour f .1 in the_ rad _ waste _.b.ui_lding. _The two inspectors who observed

) wanted to reject the joint and require bond. The QCasuperintendent.

substance (latent) ' be removed from the joint to get a bet,ter the lead ins , disagreed and got_ ,

because ."~ pector, told him to. to sign off the pour felt that.1 signed it T also felt that with the contractor, Walsh Construction Company.QC sup~ervision ~ ~ ~ ~

~~ j was was the too close craft superintendent on this job. At the request of

. and ~

filed a quality concern regarding this matter with the Georgia Power Company (GPC) Quality Concerns Prog ~ ram. ~ ~ said GPC investigated the matter including interviews of ' ~

for the concern, and ~ ~~. and found no reason review. said said he

~~

was satisfied with the results of the GPC concern regarding this concrete placement.. another inspector, also wrote a quality About the end of August 1984, ~~ found 9 places on a construction joint .

that had not been properly prepared. This pour was also for a floor slab

,for the rad waste building. told the Walsh contractor superintendent, about this and no matter what. called said that this placement was going .to go

, a QC supervisor for GPC.

looked at 2 of the 9 areas and called immediate supervisor,

[ .

areas. directed the contractor to take a wire brush and roughen up these 2

~ said they didn't bother to look at the other 7 areas. ~ ~ ~ ~

said eachbond.

good area was about a square foot area which was slick which would prevent a said that signed off this pour, said that during this incident he lost his temper with -

when , ~' said the pour was going no matter what. told ~

deviation report on the pour, that he was going to write a Quality Concerns Program.

then reported this incident to the GPC explained that after he filed the first quality concern, some of the other inspectors told him that was out to get his job. Subsequent to filing the quality concerns, feels he has been intimidated, some of which has been subtle. One incident involved ~

, the manager of GPC Quality Control. A truck which looked similiar to a truck owned by company was parked near a backfill area. . .. ' called '

supervisor and a.sked why _ had the truck parked down here in the way. t said .. . stared at him in an intimidating way. In another ,inci, dentalso __

was assigned to work overtime at a pour at the cooling tower. , _ _ _ was the Level 11 inspector assigned over the Level I inspectors One of

, the Level I inspectors, C _ __ wrote a memo to E ~_at this' stat.ing __

pour. that doing had this.a bad attitude and had thrown some equipment around.

, denied f

ep y - , . . , , _ . _ , y__ _. ._ - - , _ . , _ _ _ ,. _ _ _ _ _ , . _ _ , . _ _ _ _ -. . . - -

% :10'i 3 3 '2A said he reported the harassment he had received to the GPC Quality Concerns Program. On Thursday af ternoon, 10/04/84 met with GPC representatives to discuss his concerns. He was told that they had not substantiated his concerns. said they told him that there was no reason to fear for his job. went back to his office and was irmediately bE?!b?$ S YbbY $ b hh SUj hhShl h !k e

4 8

e

-