ML20213E975
| ML20213E975 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 11/04/1986 |
| From: | Kister H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Fiedler P GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20213E979 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8611130396 | |
| Download: ML20213E975 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000219/1986024
Text
!
41986
Docket No.
50-219
License No.
OPR-16
GPUNucle[rCorporation
ATTN: Mr. P. B. Fiedler
Vice President and Director
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
P. O. Box 388
Forked River, New Jersey 08'11
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Inspection Report No. 50-219/86-24
This refers to the routine safety inspection by Messrs. W. Bateman,
J. Wechselberger and W. Baunack from August 18 - October 5,1986 at the
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
The inspections consisted of document
reviews, interviews and observations of activities as documented in the enclosed
inspection report. The findings were discussed with you and other members of
your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.
An apparent violation of NRC requirements is cited in Appendix A and categorized
under the General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions,
10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (Enforcement Policy 1986). Additionally, a concern
arose during review of Licensee Event Reports regarding an excessive time lapse
between initiation of a safety concern and its resolution.
The safety concern
that took approximately 18 months to resolve involved the connection of two
non-seismic pipe lines to Emergency Service Water piping.
In your response to
this report, please provide additional information relative to (1) the delay in
reporting and addressing this safety concern and (2) steps you will take to
improve the timeliness of your evaluation process.
We acknowledge receipt of your September 5,1986 response to the Violation cited
in Inspection Report 86-17 and the September 11, 1986 response to the Violations
cited in Inspection Report 86-12. Your corrective actions will be verified in a
future NRC inspection.
Your action to establish twenty-four hour management coverage of the plant during
this report period is considered a positive step toward assuring a satisfactory
conclusion to the outage.
A review of the completion status of commitments you made in your December 5,
1985, response to NRC Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP)
Report 85-99 was performed and is documented in this report.
In general it
appears you have initiated steps and made progress toward accomplishing your
commitments, although not all of your corrective action schedules were met.
8611130396 861104
ADOCK 05000219
G
urrtCIAL-RECORD COPY
IR OC 86-24 - 0001.0.0
10/30/86
y
n es
j
r
GPU Nuclear Corporation
2
.
The response directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Your cooperation with us in these matters is appreciated.
Sincerely,
Original Signed By:
Harry B. Kister, Chief
Projects Branch No. 1
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
(2) NRC Region I Report No. 50-219/86-24
cc w/ encl:
BWR Licensing Manager
Licensing Manager, Oyster Creek
Public Document Room (PDR)
local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspector
State of New Jersey
bcc w/ encl:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encis)
DRP Section Chief
DRS Director
DRSS Director
J. Wiggins, DRS
P. K. Eapen, DRS
M. Shanbaky, DRSS
9
RI:DRP
RI.:DRP
RI: RP
[xBateman
Blough
Kister
10/ h'86
10/A/86
1$/d/86
- 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
IR OC 86-24 - 0001.1.0
10/30/86
,_-