ML20213A294

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/86-34 on 861201-31 & Notice of Violation.Response to Violation C Not Required Due to Corrective Actions Noted During Insp.Violation B Re Control of Mod Activities Previously Noted & Response Requested
ML20213A294
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 01/29/1987
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20213A296 List:
References
NUDOCS 8702030202
Download: ML20213A294 (2)


See also: IR 05000285/1986034

Text

'

i

In Reply Refer To: JAN 20 27

Docket: 50-285/86-34

Omaha Public Power District

ATTN: R. L. Andrews, Division Manager-

Nuclear Production

1623 Harney Street

Omaha, Nebraska 68102

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by P. H. Harrell of this office during

the period December 1-31, 1986, of activities authorized by NRC Operating

License DPR-40 for the Fort Calhoun Station, and to the discussion of our

findings with you and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the

inspection.

Areas examined during the inspection included operational rafety verifications,

maintenance, surveillance, plant tours, safety-related system walkdowns,

security observations, inoffice review of periodic and special reports,

followup on previously identified items, cold weather preparations, and

followup on an allegation related to dismissal of an individual for

incompetence. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective

examination of procedures and representative records, interviews with

personnel, and observations by the inspector. The inspection findings are

documented in the enclosed inspection report.

During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities were in

violation of NRC requirements. Consequently, you are required to respond to

these violations, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of

Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of

Federal Regulations. Your response should be based on the specifics contained

in the Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter. Since it was also found

during this inspection that you have taken corrective action, inc19 ding action

to prevent recurrence, no response to Violation C need be submitted.

Violation B revealed the continuing failure to adequately control modification

activities, in that.this finding is similar to previous concerns identified by

the NRC during the Safety System Outage Modification Inspection completed in

early 1986. Prompt management attention is needed regarding this matter.

We have also examined actions you have taken with regard to previously

identified inspection findings. The status of these items is identified in

paragraph 2 of the enclosed report.

_

l

W $lf

PI:RPB/B

$W

C:RPB/B

,

ACM/

/{&5'

.C $Pil

SRI:RPB/B

Mullikin Hunter Emerson 4 Gag 1fardo

hHarrell:cs / /u/87 Q j /)y/87

1 F /87

'

t/;\/87

) {/u/87

B702030202 870129

PDR ADOCK 05000285

I _- _ .___ _

. -

,

Orcaha Public Pcwer District -2-

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to

discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

2

"

cmr manea ecy

H.' !, L"

J. E. Gagliardo, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A - Notice of Violation

2. Appendix B - NRC Inspection Report

50-285/86-34

cc w/ enclosures:

W. G. Gates, Manager

Fort Calhoun Station

P. O. Box 399

Fort Calhoun, Nebraska 68023

-

Harry H. Voigt, Esq.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

Kansas Radiation Control Program Director

Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director <

bec to DMB (IE01)

bec distrib. by RIV:

  • RPB * Resident Inspector R. D. Martin, RA
  • R&SPB *Section Chief (RPB/B) *RSB
  • RIV File DRSP *D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015)
  • MIS SYSTEM *RSTS Operator * Project Inspector
  • M. Emerson
  • w/766