ML20211R010
| ML20211R010 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1984 |
| From: | Yin I NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Schierling H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20197F919 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-489 NUDOCS 8607280079 | |
| Download: ML20211R010 (3) | |
Text
_
e..
2 KEr,
UNITED STATES o
y
$3, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
{
S REGION lil 5-
+7 CLEN ELLYN, ILLINOl$ 60037
%,.....f OCT 1 1984 Docket No. 50-275 MEMCRANDUM FOR:
Hans Schierling, Project Manager, Licensing Branch No. 3, Division of Licensing FROM:
I. T. Yin, Senior Mechanical Engineer, Engineering Branch, Division of Reactor Safety, RIII
SUBJECT:
SALP INPUT FOR DIABLO CANYON Per your memo dated September 20, 1984, please find attached assessment for the SALP Board meeting for Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 currently scheduled on October 17, 1984.
I. T. Yin, Senior Mechanical Engineer
Enclosure:
As Stated cc:
J. G. Keppler r
bnw 8607280079 860723 PDR FOIA HALE 86-489 PDR
SALP Evaluation-Diablo Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 NRR Activity:
Piping and Support Review Effort Prepared By:
I. T. Yin, Engineering Branch, RIII Overall Performance Category: 3 1.
Management Involvement in Assuring Ouality Performance Category 3
Basis The lack of licensee management concern of QN provision and implementation resulted in violation of just about all the NRC regulations applicable to piping design control including 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criteria 2, 16, 5, 3, 18, and 17.
2.
Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from Safety Standpoint-Performance Category 3
Basis The approach to resolution of NRC identified significant technical issues resulted from its OA breakdown has been:
(1) analyzing it away rather than improving the component design, (2) minimum in review and evaluation coverage, and (3) ignoring the possibility that similar problems could exist in other areas.
3.
Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives Performance Category 3
Basis The licensee has not been responsive to the inspection. findings. The-common approach was to negotiate with the staff managenent rather than to resolve the noncompliance and issues with the inspector. Some of the corrective actions had been lacking in depth or unjustifiably compromised.
4.
Enforcement History Performance Category Basis No inspection or evaluation conducted, a
5.
Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events Performance Category Basis No inspection or evaluation conducted.
6.
Staffing (Including Manaaement)
Performance Category 3
Basis There has been a severe shortage of site OA/QC personnel to ensure that piping design activities are in compliance with the NRC regulations and the established program provisions. The head of the Onsite Project Engineering Group, himself the former licensee site QA supervisor, ignored or bypassed many QA program requirements.
7.
Training Effectiveness and Oualification Performance Category 3
Basis The general and special technical /QA training programs were inadequate.
Procedure requirements had continuously been ignored. Site contractor design personnel had been working months without indoctrination or training using unapproved methods and reference materials.
a 2
y
.r
~
-m
6
, ps terogo UNITED STATES
[ g '[k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g%
October 3,1984 o
MEMORANDUM FOR:
G. W. Knighton, Chief Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing FROM:
W. R. Butler, Chief Containment Systems Branch Division of Systems Integration
SUBJECT:
SALP INPUT FOR DIABLO CANYON The memorandum from H. Schierling of your branch, dated September 20, 1984, requested that we provide a SALP input for Diablo Canyon, specifically l
for the effort related to the allegations concerning debris from unqualified paints inside containment. The appropriate SALP input was attached to the memorandum transmitting our SER on this subject (Houston to Novak, dated June 29, 1984). A copy of that input is attached.
h k,k_s_
W. R. Butler, Chief Containment Systems Branch Division of Systems Integration
Attachment:
As stated j
cc:
R. Houston T. Novak H. Schierling.
CONTACT:
J. Pulsipher, CSB: DSI x29483
-g4/64<p%29L
7
~
l ENCLOSURE 2 i
SALP i
prepared by the Containment Systeins Branch i
Evalua tion Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 Criteria Ca te go ry Narra tive Description Management. Involvenent N/A,
.1 e.
Approach.to Resolution 2
of Technt,qa1 issues The licensee has generally demonstra ted understanding o f the issues.
Their approach was viable and sound from a safety standpoint.
1.
Responsiveness 2
The licensee responded to NRC concerns in a post Live and timely manner.
8
', e 1,.
Enforcendt llistory N/A 5.
Reportable Events N/A 5.
Sta f fing N/A 1
Training.
N/A
~
e s
SALP Evaluation Diablo Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 NRR Activity: A M M /euflic M d Branch:
64/A e'
Prepared by:fj,J G, _
l Overall Performance Category: J+
l Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis nA r
u y
- " 9 MN 2
+
w a 6appA nA
~
A.
2.
Approach to Resolution of Technical issues from bgM M dhw
</,M
, MM' Safety Standpoint
/
""c 3- "*;P;"'lv;"*
A. A w S.p y r~
- we a, ewe
/
9.z a p m a p p ascus
/
t 4.
Enforcement History kr 5.
Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events
//, g, M
M b eut/'-
dA 6.
Staffing (Including oAL-
" " 9'*'"U J
L L.J g D u s a Anca uec.n Jamuy
&,'.s:L nJub w - & wA &, & @L u 7.
Training Effectiveness h.
,@.. b o 6M nd Qualification
/
1
9 SALP Evaluation Diablo Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 4'ivi< /.rnesc7 va Ac Aged NRR Activity: 6'E/5n ic /J 59ec7-5,.;
Prepared by: M. P o A K.
Branch: 6 6 EB /D e-Overall Performance Category: 8 Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis zte b.,
A - o.~,l e dg e - b /e,-w o v /- y a v.e r
/W a e g(u e,,7
,s'c e,,, s/, f f.e.,s (, of-dra u.r o r~u.,,3 i 1.
Management involvement e 4 t >. ~ Q n a (p s 3 r
/.(f.4, in Assuring Quality h < 10.
b clase>sseoJ
- /" (* *' J %
'" ^ ")
- ' k ' "6 4 u-r y,.e a o,
/xa ng
-ct,-< i e fr e.. ars")
o h uk e x: 1 2.
Approach to Resolution of y,, a g.e,,,.,,, -r jg,,es ) mg,- 4, g,, c,,,,,,,,
- .s W & l a e l' - /
-/'o'
-Ca --
(/odcct-Technscal Issues from j,4,
d e, t e ri
- Safety Standpotnt g
4
,j,,
y_
ca.e sc rios to oss a boa e e,*'dt -a s. g c.ce 4 a ca /
s edAy r>r o e,I.a s o + m -, f f a 'T
,,w s sa -s s, a t
-th <
w.<<<
m s a arv:,,~ J.
3.
Responsiveness to NRC p p~sn c, m n 'T" t's t w d< J <jso'c V Iy c.
r<
,, 2 r -fac-g, J.,, a % a N*
' " + ' ' * * ' * ~ '
S' '"* "l c
a d. t3 A s */
r-' vs-# w s.
)
^ lu r. h,,g <<sirJan.,n-to J m i
lnitiatiyes S+a N 72* 4-oxsw -
o p,,n l
4.
Enforcement History
//O 06 SI) h r~
e v
- lu
- Si r, g i
I Reporting and Analysis of 5.
Reportable Events g*
045!' jr t vg (v ahr e g s
6.
Staffing (Including 6 tf d e / 3 4 c< o~/
"/
- /o~'e
/e />
.o u -,' m A-a / fu r
- i
-f ar ca.<
f < <** c # / * '- job
&~' b - Jo<
- Management) g 7.
Training Effectiveness A/D
($//5fJ pr>A E,/e4 wMI d C and Qualification t
~.
sALP Evaluation Diabl.o Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 NRR Activity: k h
WP MhEfbb-y y
v vv vc Prepared by:f'7. MNZ-tre1M [boJd4hanch: NL6 1p t/[)
S Overall Performance Category:
2 Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis N"A N
g y
p y n a % 'y% f &%ww. a
~w
~A 5
z J awn a WMm M & p.au)+.+. w & J %owy M.
IS$EnN1$s N m" "W
F' ~ ~ "
i n d % h ed/ Wd N
~b' h
/'k safety standpoint
'2 sM.
b p4 3.
R s
ness to NRC kgp g
N l
i a
m~
4 ~.
4.
Enforcement History J/
t
/F
!' 5.
Reporting and Analysis of g
Reportable Events p
6.
staffing (Including Management) g 6 hw g
- [pM 4
Ic. 44 M ff
- Jt 4-o M M M@d 7.
Training Effectiveness IAM Cw g /24< e -*(
j g
Q hr and Qualification 7
Wk
SALP Evaluation Diablo Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 NRR Activity: [*,dfM hgral((c Nm Prepared by:
//
h Branch: Gd 6
Overall Performance Category:
1 Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis e ~d N #/W M tc/M f o Q, % g f g jj[
1.
Management Involvement 4%,o
~
g in Assuring Quality J
t-4 f"~44, !!dI O>id;d&f m/fug 4 %
n m r d acalf m a.
2.
Approach to Resolution of gg
-gf 9/p#,.pt-g f Ara d ggggg h w h~
- l Y
f"t4<h,1 WW-NP*'%,
/
S fet S and L
h 0
Mwa$'Qyd tv.4 l' tks
,4p m M
i
- 6 ud,aAt AsL4 64(
2-21"?"'l,"l"'"'*""'
G ut4, G 09~NMa pGA WA~
g4+ pay;&y, w & a/w r a J w $ dh% ~g 7
M > d W [bb<*ke-te$kt.)"f/1/ ()b uN 4.
Enforcement History f ' yt % Y ft M.
0 sp jy p.
tr &
Mr,
E$ 5' d{ b l** r eL t *Y,"
5.
Reporting and Analysis of hJ[fp /Ntf #C644g/
t Reportable Events Y/kh..
,m l,k,
6.
Staf fing (Including Management)
(t wp ej, i w, /: <
a
. //
1 7.
Training Effectiveness and cuaiification 60 u-,'[
% ge f<..j c ~ t i
y
<c m.-_-
.. _. = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
SALP Evaluation Diablo Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 NRR Activity:.Th\\/E [nonfersmte. defraw issue 5 k and hooxmY 6/sw j
.[
_], } Ale /miel BranIh: AS8 N,d'/**
'P i f\\ D M Prepared by:
in nzy tLYio a L y
Overall Performance Category:
2.
d if J.DN Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis 1.
Management Involvement g a., m g4 Wo/veM Wu drow iniha/ly is
%e MV fcogg in Assuring Quality g,
s re vieWJ bay fo M *- d' adation N fals
- [ /ef/ chief y
i am th ewree, effect was W
/aTer o k.
Tht. liaeasee er*/// 4'~~r% fed an yProc et. fo r er olah.
$$ inn 1 $s us'$n" 2
o f yeouce,: f *"0.-ce<- wuet cm.ccol,s o k..s/esye. of safety Standpoint si d C erClerces a^d Sdelp.
3.
Responsiveness to NRC
' peg fggg do d[.[
cegce g Varsed c((g (og &
froviued ${we]l
]
revCety frecsS$, hwy' St.
l[c<4et U.Svw tap @s.
4.
Enforcement Historf5*
0 5.
Reporting and Analysis of d-Reportable Events n
6.
Staffing (Including keogg g()/e g /sc m5ee,.
tw% power 61cludswg $d Acce(ra
" "#9"
Ma+c enrY oversi iti" (Da$
froVided for reYddic~ Oh
.Tb P and dlycdCo e c on c e.ru,
l 7.
Training Effectiveness and Qualification
/d
l l
,g A
j.
D
]
n k
3 3,
p6 e
n.
w ru
.,3, so s
l gW sp c
n m
[
v
],
3A
=
d - {f 3
g.
gA; ggY A
l EEA p Mg2 q
A o
FJu s
O e
/
0
(. j *~
P SM$
S n
h '~ -
y'c
/
M s
e e
N g
ypL*
9 e
1 s
eM J P ((c,gm g,,,f.
i 3#
n s
[J a. $'["
k n
%,g a u
J o
. Q g w.u N
u
- J f>
rb
)
w J
A t.
)
h,k' Q
e
/
a C,
1 E
J g.3 '$m
'S u
e w
i
~
+
'r I*
2 V
I A
e u
/
y =p 7.
M fr g
h [td>1~
J, y N
c' g
c h
e u
c A
o r.
n w
%I O
0 a
a J
g r
s.
B
,/
/ '
u
-g )tn s
s I
/
N
,4 &Y-ui s
t g
i s
n, 2
C a
}
i, i
L jp.
a :.
r.
s f,
s c
s_
e f, %, g L r,.
g g
y k
i a
h j n r
s n
o a
5 a
p u,4 a
g B
4
[
e f
C
$g
{"
t o
a s,
~
a C
l, o~L t
e a
c e
c i
/
c n
A 7 D /
n ay a
mr m
ro h
J[,
n l
c D
r og g
Q i
o f e g
t y
f rt g
a t
y r
ea u
b e
PC i
v P
l a
d f
f i
v t
e l
o o
E c
r l
A a
a t
n s'-
s P
p r
n om C
i s
L R e
e e
o R
s e
i A R r
v my t r N
y y
g n
i S N P
O et uf r
l n
e vi l
t o
o as vn i
ll osn t
t nt d
io oa sei s
An u
ti vu euo s
e l
ct i
nQ R sp s
H d v c
ea i
sd e
nE n
f c g
oI n ns t
a I) fi n
t n t
a ee n
e
( t Ef on ni l t vv e
gl n
i o
er h aS i
m nb ge gl ii ti mu cc st e
a nm ina i
ar es ai y na c
t t i
e u
ue gs ont oi r
rr f g nQ
~
l t aA rh e pt o
oo f a i
ai n
pcf si f
pp an ad vr an pea en n
ee t a rn EC Mi ATS RI E
3 4
5 6
1 L
date tydiudtiuii viauto Lanyon Unit I, January 1,
1963 - June JU, 1964 NRR Activity:
'8 0/ T'e-d dosudersoa r Prepared by: (( Po e,. t;_
Branch: Sc c 6 / Dr
~
Overall Performance Category:
8 Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis 1.
Management involvement ps e,,. 3 r.,
-er,. 3 ;
n,4,,a p,
,,-r a-F -ce, - y i., t 3 t-r, j e sf u-/,
,ateo /g- /
in Assuring Quality o,,, / _cu, s s ag,,,,,c,,,
p g, c,
m,m S
a./
c.,, c -,
J -cw a -1
-cu-k ie s w-<-
c to - > *c/fs k-2.
Approach to Resolution of 7-L
-f,e e j,., c < l a sse.r s or,-., +1 oI%s' hf%) IJJu*J
'toWr'
-e it / sorc.< J V a,.t3, - s/oc a re, #,*-l* *tr o *J Technical Issues from n //,.s u- ) d1 Safety Standpoint j
o,f,/,g,4., y st n,,Je</s vida.
- - er aszu-p, m, (,,,3 a,
c, y < -r,, t i y o v o, t. h I"
/ 8 O "4 * "'" 41 ** a/ M 5t'"J r-4 o rt 3 v i t / s,.; A/
eag e to #srei s 4 3.
Responsiveness to NRC
-r7,4
.1a-eg<-
d was h
- c 14 -
5 % * -/-/
4,,.9 e ftoy,/-a Initiatives rh a 6 e < <
- I rey v w h,/
3 f
s s 4J < t t' O "Ch
- f i *,rt-wl.cl a cz-< J 1 I,r to
'c%
w a < -<-
a /{sgs h a.s1 o *J bo its n 9 4.
Enforcement History g,
y, y
5.
Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events w
/h y, j.-[ i
,,,, /s a % e,s p 1
l i
'T h-
/e/ o l' 5 'M M4 }
'4<'/u/<,,J n s c.<,5y o,<3
,,, 4 o q < m., -f-6.
Staffing (Inc1uding
_, s,,
,,, j Management) tu 4.s n /-ys s -f-oJ x,,, /r s -r g,,,,,,3 fI.,.,-f
-L-o a r ~1.
7.
Training Effectiveness g oj,,
ff-
, yy ( o,-ti,,7 and Qualification I
SALP Evaluation Diablo Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 NRR Activity: f)Mov/t/ftfe PP/NT A/JD l'9S7 Accioft/f SAh/'L/Ald $ 6 W' Prepared by: fffU)K
[
10/r7 Branch: C//EN K At ENC /Alif&JC Overall Performance Category:
/
Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis
[ # r.deaw w / #A'* # #
1.
Management InvoIvement in Assuring Quality f
g gm*
gg 2.
Approach to Resolution of 74 p-g/ 4gg
,f
,j g g
T Technical Issues from Safety Standpoint
/
g/M w-W hje %
r4W og/mo.
y TA' /tArnd.t md dist[bSn N l m r1 M' M t
i
-J4-a u a -
4.
Enforcement History un 55/-
n
.A a
JA
\\
fM' f
5.
Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events At jq 6.
Staffing (Including Management)
/
1 7.
Training Effectiveness and Qua1ification jl//)
msr tvaluttlee'afable Canyon Unit 1. Ja'noery.1. H53 ; Jebe A 1984
. ~,..
~2
...z.
M/*#9'A fuM4F" **V/pg gppogy-- GeeseseJ agen Actfrity:
4 csb.O/(7 factosue 3
. ;/
s itepared by:59Af44. MAN 04 y
- Ersch:
- A*db KOVP Ader4*# ).,
i D6V'*C EAC4 FECN !**G. > R&W'*A/ T 1
O mrall Perfennance Catsgery:..
2
-. N.
- ' '. toshsetiet s
{
knirtanne'nte
~
Olterien
~
. Bests
~
Category
- t. Renegnannt Eneeleennet
~
i
\\
- iaAssuringQuality M M'M'"4J7 erMsgorcD Ah! 4'9 acus.*F pgang 1
r i
. g. -
acawssae, r4a urisary; row ascissea pe'sadinicy 1+2
=
~
i
- LL C*dnt'CL6D14*r toIutes ADEquart es4**T. RadtGWi s*+was
"+s urouayAraearen.
1 k fVoEau d oes 9* ten yt corroereseeonate s daq:c c
\\
-tedanc~et sssues tres.
cLe+E.advedsrutbre, o '.1;ecuar.
- 4 -
wuoen opre,casenty.
'J7AFF *'UE Ptoffntt.f.Cf4fPtb AND For*?fopen';:pyrigg Q & te Reso1*t % of ne w peg c
}.,
,'5*f*\\y Staannefnt
_/-
m,,,,,,g,,,,,,_ w,,a,.a p r, cst:s.tsas.r 4 s.,sisers q c.A w 7,s,q
?
,,. rag ; you aa. w,,4,,,;;,,,,,
y g4m
,g,
+res r>w areneess ;~riagey a ter
,,,,o aa.,a,g A ss cSsatsb w
.sroa inpsess rme Asussasar ii sucry.-
i f.L nedpasie== Ass-Aa Enc.
ma N5st*t**'.c trwcystjntY sesMn!Nw rQc saarr*rryapp-
- SeitlatM
-~ f-.,..* d: asheiFi A<riverw -deffwese.s P*4*daarnM&#
)
ae
!,accarrosu.:
pp
(
.s 4,
Entertementifistory cea J.7 vaaso A canctussoa
- " M sts or= Fddr M od 7" !" V" M *WY J!#pr4peasse c4F04Caaedr f
uce.ozi.>,.
D f ' O C'"Y'"
- l
~
n-o S: atp nnetysss ef fMC-AsCid.Itt Afkf f44?ff r r*J 2 6tV4.rr M 4AcY flo b oAIG.s 7,.;,_,,
or ro$;e.*.*..n --
i
,,..,r, _. _..
,,,,,, e,,n,,,,,,,,,,,,,_ _
,t s
WT*-rCSO,
.... r'aurwty
\\
l S. Stattfag (incla6 fag fMG Pedfal AfMxc RAVP4 ff 8hSED 4R ' ESEtJrTo0N nanagement)
- t.
s e f o e c A a r> Mrce 7"* Lt6eac'"4 lut*st
- F sT4fftM+
\\
T H e nts so sa
}
,,,,,,.a.,,an..aa.ar,orm.a. wa,. r e u r a s fffsMt TH Fdt' Y'k '%
- ' 'U4 34' 4
a
.oa ~,ar,<.z M u'64 i
'*"O <tu'<IFICArraN_'6frers rgrae s.s WBAg M Trabnim lffactiveness
'Y^ !A'# 4 l
' W W iffC3tiDn W LA W G4. JTh q s. AO6 Qg)syg Q
e
'M
\\
r * /ta t *Dute.s papyg*yyapaseem gpe use essenwr arrw deonsr 4:*e<6eR. p gag ga4ggsygg l
-oorr~~,o esec l
1 o
____ __- - - ------m---- yp_ ~a >m ~? ~-',:Qh- - - - - - - -
me secoes. os
,voara,es waa /
I
SALP Evaluation Diablo Canyon Unit 1 January 1, 1983 - June 30, 1984 0
NRR Activity: TOttf, F r v VM W tJVC 3.4 W 3 7'ips-k SugJ II Prepared by:
/% h 7 z HM Branch:
M 6b Overall Performance Category:
3
' ?'
Evaluation Performance M
'd'%
Criterion Category Basis f
p.
./
p._j
/
y,lde. d f
- M MM3
% wfA qf,q/5 Mk Ne&d M
1.
Management Involvement in Assuring Quality y
p g&
9
- } I k S ' t '~
h % % Y g s.
M M'
Wb e hn i
s Safety Standpoint
.3 hMy M
M d.ao y - p m Wm -
Syw U f S
L '9~~ W) j Q ' M '.% ~fp 4.
u 3.
s ess to NRC kW h PA2.ha.< ) p%
4 g p sp,3%.
& % k k >~ >} L3
~
4.
Enforcement History TJo W y Q Uc + W A
' 5.
Reporting and Analysis of
/
g/p Q[-
g,l p,(,,i d Reportable Events I
I
.ft.c e ek W 6.
Staffing (Including f
Management) 2,.
d 7.
Training Effectiveness Tc.,th. u.C FWJ
^h}
^
and Qualification
]
r,y &
pc t-/ry> uc
/-
,y Q
hi
]Qs ivh N
SALP Evaluation Diablo Canyon Unit 1, January 1,1983 - June 30,1984 NRR Activity: ?sDivia a_nd duBOo d kd V1f Rl E N fi-Prepared by: b bi //nfo.ys Branch: 7M /2)
Overall Performance Category:
Evaluation Performance Criterion Category Basis 1.
Management Involvement hhyw
% M Murftm J.m Mn M g P G l 6 /F)fa x M owv AtM,L
- pat fi>c 'aml" <a%
h dd in Assuring Quality
?
3
&g d,A y st,awnm4 Atdh,w"Maywo amt 94t Aub_ gmwyteu heuterto,
2.
Approach to Resolution of 74EE
& h M&d%
f MMd
- 424 SNe$'NaINo"Nt 1.
g 4
4 ha cmdd;a 2.c.00 4 w 4 nt 7Cta vwai lhua >
3.
Responsiveness to NRC
@G3 E p
,D4 MW dN
& n %k.
f;Litz, vt,+ cadL.tuvto. PG LE AA>zt) 1nitiatives 1
y g p. nut @
ket JAat tixtwa lunae hhim-tmJt 2.cniUf U
4.
Enforcement History
)
' ' 5.
Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events b
M 6.
Staf fing (Including Management) jlQ,')ilf 7.
Training Effectiveness and Qualification g gg3
.