ML20211P847
| ML20211P847 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1985 |
| From: | Kaczor W DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | Byron P NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211P714 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-245 STG-85-744, NUDOCS 8607230387 | |
| Download: ML20211P847 (7) | |
Text
.
r.m (d) r.'terial withhold frem
- ..ii
- cisclosure l
Detroit FERMI 2 PROJECT I
SAFETEAM Date:
May 13, 1985 STG-85-744 To:
Paul Byron Nuclear Regulatory Co==ission EF2-OSB Fro =:
/
SAFETEAM Investigator
Subject:
Potential Wrone Doine SAFETEAM Concern Attached are copies of 5AFETEAM Concerns No. 655 and 656. These concerns are potential violations of ASME Code: Section III Subsection NCA, Articles:
NCA-4134.2, NCA-4134.17 and the FSAR as stated by the concernee. Investigation of the subject is now in progress.
$/ps Approved By:
W. J. X.ac:c r V Director, SAFETEAM Attachment i
e 5
s-y > z jg
- 0~9 6 5 6 i
l I
No ra d oAG ANIZ ATION mTLE
')
W DUTIES
-~
M8I 1.3 lidb l
SAFETEAM CONCERN:
3e c
/?ttached QCL
- T S-ov
'3 IA y eptta h/C 7e
- f lVPc ' Vic1 Aries'
&f (sal' a rv/ AS'n f*
['c de T //
f 2.790 (d) MATERIAL WITHOLD FROM PJ.;ut 0;50LOSURI I
f I_
l l
f T
l COMPUTEA CODE COMMENT; d
- UCLMR SAFETj gcz,47gp M} #*
b G RK P ACt'A f t$ L A c K ADfE 9 06T C STollA 4' E hi U U C. t1 A tuTcu A u cE 0R4',
CLOSED DATE
?
.o N9 00656
e o.
4t*2.* 1/-M/
0 CONCERN:
The lack of adequate storage for completed work packages on safsky related components performed by the Maintenance Organization of Nuclear Production, which effects the retrievability of QA records.
a TINDING:
Numerous completed work packages have been rejected by the Records Vault (Building 44A) and returned to the originating organization (Maintenance),
at which time, these packages are stored in desks, boxes, or other loca-tions that do not meet roject procedure requirements. This problem has been observed for the st few months.
RITERENCE DOCUMENTS:
11,000.49 " Document Control and Records Management" N.O.1.P:
Q.A.P.R.: 17
" Quality Assurance Records" ASME Code:
Section 111 Subsection NCA Articles: NCA-4134.2 NCA-4134.17 12.000.15 "PN21 (work order) Processing" P.O.M.:
s O
g-DAV EMPLOYER Ucayn c
7 ORGANIZATION / TITLE
)
%d MAY 061985
.# DUTIE S.
i
~
SAFETEAM l > >/S ! K I L, 74' M Pdr l
l n
CONCERN:
concernee dissa~tisfied with bandling of QAl and BOP packages which, iator for clean-upEhese packages, even though some o for various reasons, are rejected by the Records Center and returned to init etc.
Information contair;ed in not procedurally acceptable for storage in the vault, is necessary in closing out licensing documents.
Information is also valuable for records' keeping purposes.
Since procedures for vault approval have tightened up--the vault is rejecting even more packages than in the past.
Depending on the department concerned, bandling varies.
In some cases, info is not being stored properly, while in other instances, storing is suitable but docu=ents are not being processed back to the vault in a ticely manner, information laying around on initiators' desks or shoved back in a corner for long periods of tice.
Concernee feels that low priority placed on these matters is a contributing factor. Feels that traceability is poor.
Guesses that hundreds of PN21s alone are missing.
2,790 (d) MATUJAl WITHOLD FROM PU;u; DiSCOSURE I
I l
l l
l 3
I COMPUTER CODE COMMENT:
N($k O.dbg @ A L A G P P
~
(e C & c 4.a cts p a y
+.
%s CLOSED DATE I
tp N2 00655
4 e ~
e 6
%)
m e
m 4
- Le l
r g
f f
,.O
00'665!
I f
7.3cuy'n 4
o,, y oRG ANIZ ATIONmTLE DUTIES:
67L SAFETEAM h
- CONCERN: [i Q [ f f,^^^ f N b w
akD O
? O & m kMbA T
waches n & a~ #'
O" D) ;b1)
Y sN
- /-
n 8'
0 M
0 LWQB%>
k w1 I
I i
I iI I
I I
I
/
COMPUTER CODE COMMENT:'~
~
gpM diadiu IdW I 6 6*
1 30 &,M e%I Q wp Vsd
]
~,
x g.
~
vyggf~4$1 ~M w3
,=
gW wf CLOSED DATE Ad W
T N9 00665 l
/...
f-3 /
ATTACHMENT 60
r___-
f
- 665
-)
On 4-25-85 I received a phone call from IwastoldthathealthphysicswashavingtopullsamplesevEf'8h'ouYs around the clock on the cire water decante because they were decanting to Lake Erie and they had received a low flow annunciation on the cire water decante line monitor D'
F 0 'r 3 The low flow annunciation indicates that the monitor is re.ceiving sufficient flow to give adequate readout data.
It was not sampling properly. He requested that I contact someone to get a p-e pa o s
PN2) issued to have the problem resolved. /iffs,$dd the monitor should be Y
repaired because they didn't want to maintain 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> sampling around the clock as required by the Tech Specs.
l So, I contacted PSE on the Radiation Monitoring System.
He initiated PN21 #653164.
It was issued and signed by the ShiftfSuper totheI6CShopon5-3-85,athpD MstP on 4-25-85.
That PN21 finally got which time
{
they deter =ined that the sample pump motor was bad.
Now, according to Tech Specs, you are allowed to decant for up to 30 days prodiding you pull 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> samples around the clock.
Well, up until this time, they'd been following it, but once they wrote up this-they determined that it was an electrical problem and the I6C Shop wouldn't hanzlle it, the Maintenance Group would handle it.
So, a new PN21 was issued on 5-3-85 and it was 0818515. That PN21 is still open today(0 'd' NjU}D w The proble= is that they have decanted since the third of May and they didn't pull their 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> samples as required by Tech Specs. They have a 30-day tic:e frame with which to have that monitor repaired and after 30 days you're not allowed to decante into Lake Erie. They have still continued to decante into Lake Erie, they're not pulling their samples the way they should, and they're 1
f 665 (cont 'd) 7 f
in deep trouble., Now, they're saying that they're good until the 15th of.6j, b ecausc f bref Sa sf t' /m t it wetni i n t P r ra fI V C.
u.n+,I 4hc ) $'t h Id P but there is documentation on it, in fact, this monitor that they had received the annunciator, I believe, 2 days prior to the issuance of the PN21.
d go Y
According to their ARP for that low annunciator, that n
o, was inop the minute they got that low flow annunciator. And it was in fact a proble=.
The fact that the pump motor was bad says that that monitor was bad and they should not be decanting into Lake E fa.
But, they are still doing so, and that is my concern. They should stop decanting into Lake Erie, they should get this monitor repaired.
And they have not issued an LER either against themselves.
And, they're in violation in 3 different ways that I can see for not maintaining their sa=ple (around the clock sampling) while decanting, for continuing to decante into Lake Erie after the 30 day tice frame, and for not taking ic=ediate action and reporting their violation of the Tech Specs.
"OK, and you have, reported it, right?" Answer:
Oh, yeah, I've done what I've done here,bchnow I'm reporting it to SAFETEAM and I have made other in-dividuals aware of the problem throughout and I've tried to increase Opera-tion's awareness of the problem. And Operations does not seem receptive.
They seemed to indicate that the monitor was not declared inoperative until the 15th of May, and that--there's no way.
That monitor was definitely in-operative this whole time frame, from the time they got that annunciator, which was probably on the 23rd of April.
So, it's been in violation at a minimum--They've been in violation since the 25th.
Interviewer:
"25th of April, right?" Concernee: Well, since the 25th of May, any decanting into Lake Erie is in direct violation. 'The fact that they didn't do their 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> sampling around the clock while they've been decanting off and on during this time frame also has me concerned. They're not taking their Ars /c ent monitor seriously.
/1gk NOTE FROM CONCERNEE:
NOC-may be valuable for gaining more in-de info on this concern.
y 3e e
h l*
b s
=
5 h
a b
an h.
Ae A
Qh
- '/
4 4
k
- g
,1.
0 4
e1 $*
G e
h a
t 6
d e
D R&
0
,e3.,
e c
' C..,
a e
s e b
.S.... f i.
- e g
- f
- 4., #4
.47 {. ',, <-
s r
h l
t e