ML20211P426
| ML20211P426 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/07/1986 |
| From: | Chaffee A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Withers B PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20211P430 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-61405, NUDOCS 8607230230 | |
| Download: ML20211P426 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000344/1986019
Text
_ _ .
-
._
_
.
- --
.- -
--
-
--
_
,
.
, ,
'
'
(.
-
p-
,
, ,,
,
.
,
_
..
,,,
~
-
.
<
'r
. , ,
3
q,
f
J(f 071986
,
J
Docket No. 50-344
.
9
,
.
Portland' General Electric Company
- .
121 S..W. Salmon Street
Portland, Oregon 97204
'
I
Attentio'n:
.Mr. Bart D. Withers
Vice President Nuclear
Gentlemen:
i
Subject: NRC Inspection of the Trojan Nuclear Plant
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. S. A; Richards and Mr. G. 'C.
Kellund of this office on April 29 - June 16, 1986 of activities. authorized by'
,
NRC License No. NPF-1, and to the discussion of our findings held by Mr.
Richards and Mr. Kellund with Mr. Orser and other members of your staff
periodically during the inspection.
[
i
t
i
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection
report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with
. personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
,
No violations of NRS requirements were identified within the. scope of this
,
inspection.
>
As discussed in paragraph 7 of this report, we considered your staff's initial
'
{
actions to resolve- the issues surrounding the:failu~re of: steam generator
-
~ hydraulic snubbers- and resulting restrained thermal growth' of the reactor.
_ coolant system to be inadequate. Substantial interaction between the NRC
+
i
staff.and your staff was necessary to resolve this issue. Recent deficiencies
[
identified with the control room emergency ventilation system and the
!
containment spray chemical addition system serve to further reinforce the
- necessity of aggressively pursuing apparent deficiencies .until a firm
understanding of the root cause of problems is-' gained. Your letter of June
i
'
20, 1986,- in which you describe' actions being implemented to improve
performance in this area, appears to be a step in the right direction. We
encourage you to ensure -that top levels of management become active
participants in the actions-you have stated in your letter. We anticipate
,
discussing these actions with you in the near future.
,
~In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy of this letter and the enclosures
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
.
4
I
8607230230 860707
~
-
ADOCK 05000344
G
'
,
g
-
.
..
-.
.
- -
-
.
.
.
-JUL 071986L
-2-
'
~
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to
discuss them with you.
t
Sincerely,
,
.
-
.
.
.
A. E. Chaffee, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch
i
Enclosure:
.,
Inspection Report No. 50-344/86-19
i
cc'w/ enclosure:
,
W. S. Orser
1
,
J..W. Durham, Esq.', PGE
i
State of Oregon (Dixon)
!
bec w/ enclosure:
!
,
,
+
- RSB/ Document. Control Desk ~(RIDS)
,
Project Inspector
,
i
Resident Inspector
i
G. Cook.. -
i
B. Faulkenberry.
'
J. Martin
i
'
bec w/o enclosure:
LFMB
h
W[q
%f
h
SARicharas/ norma
GCKellund
MMendonca
AEChaffee
7/ 7 /86
7/7 /86
7/7/86
7/'7/86
i
1
4
'
r
i
t
i
, - - , .
, - - - , . , - - - , - - , , . , - - , , ,
,
, , _ , - , , , , - . . . , . . _ ,
.,n,
,,,,,.-,.--n_-,-a-,,
,n.n--------,,.,
.