Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20211G7451987-02-0606 February 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Use of Sodium Pentaborate Enriched w/B-10 in Standby Liquid Control Sys Project stage: Other ML20211G7281987-02-0606 February 1987 Application for Amend to License DPR-57,revising Tech Specs Re Use of Sodium Pentaborate Enriched w/B-10 in Standby Liquid Control Sys.Fee Paid Project stage: Request ML20214B0911987-05-0808 May 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Section 4.4.A.2 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys Project stage: Other ML20214B0861987-05-0808 May 1987 Forwards Revised Tech Spec Section 4.4.A.2 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys,Per 870505 Telcon Request.Rev Consists of New Surveillance Requirement Which Calls for Check of Sodium Pentaborate Enrichment at Each Plant Operating Cycle Project stage: Other 1987-02-06
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Hatch |
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20212J2721999-10-0101 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying DG Fuel Oil Storage Requirements ML20210G2971999-07-29029 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.1.7 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20203C5931999-02-0505 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS to Implement Previously Approved Generic Changes ML20199J9081999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Radiation Monitors ML20197H5171998-12-0404 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.1.2,deleting Footnote Which Specifies That SLMCPRs Are for Cycle 18 Only & TS Section 5.6.5.b.2 ML20236U2551998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for High Radiation Trip for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Monitors ML20197K1861997-12-18018 December 1997 Marked-up Pages to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively. Proposed Changes Delete or Modify Existing License Conditions,Surveillance Requirements That Have Been Completed & Exemptions That Are No Longer in Effect ML20211J1861997-10-0101 October 1997 Corrected TS Pages Unit 1 & 2 Page 3.4-8,Unit 1 Page 3.5-6 & Unit 2 Page 3.5-5 Provided in Order for Util to Issue Amends 208 & 150 to Manual Holders ML20211A2301997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Page 2.0-1 & Corresponding mark-up Page Re SLMCPR ML20210J0491997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2763 Mwt Which Represents Power Level Increase of 8% ML20141B8561997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Operability Requirements for Rod Block Monitor Sys ML20141B7591997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,revising Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio to Reflect Results of Cycle Specific Calculation Performed for Unit 1 Operating Cycle 18,expected to Commence in Nov 1997 HL-5376, Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits1997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits ML20133F3641997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Alternate Method of Testing S/Rvs During Shutdown Conditions Rather than During Unit Startup as Is Currently Done ML20132G2261996-12-17017 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re pressure-temp Limits ML20132E0161996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contigency Plan & Guard Training & Qualification Plan ML20135D4881996-12-0303 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR Values Based Upon Unique plant-evaluations for Current Cycle 13 & Use of GE-13 Fuel in Next Cycle 14 ML20129H9181996-10-29029 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Associating Changes W/Installation of Digital Power Range Neutron Monitoring Sys & Incorporation of long-term Stability Solution Hardware ML20128M8701996-10-0707 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,increasing Nominal Mechanical Pressure Relief Setpoints for All SRVs & Allow Operation W/One SRV & Associated Functions Inoperable ML20113F5541996-09-19019 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Applicability of Certain Surveillances Addressing Rvp & Temp Limits & Replacing Vessel Pressure & Temp Limit Curves W/New Curves ML20117M2251996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Authorizing Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator & to Have Exclusive Responsibility & Control Over Physical Const,Operation & Maint of Plant ML20115J4861996-07-16016 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Changes Through June 1996, Satisfying Requirements of 10CFR50.71 ML20117H1391996-05-21021 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5.2,ECCS - Shutdown & 3.5.2.2.b SR for Units 1 & 2 Revise to Change Unit 1 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 13 Feet & Change Unit 2 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 15 Feet ML20100H7431996-02-21021 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Changes of Drywell Air Temp LCO from 350 F to 150 F ML20094K3831995-11-10010 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Implementation of 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML20085K4011995-06-20020 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Power Uprate ML20085A1661995-06-0606 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Secondary Containment Draw Down & Vacuum Surveillance Requirement Acceptance Criteria ML20082V3791995-05-0404 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Minimizing Thermal Stratification Events ML20082L3331995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Elimination of Selected Response Time Testing Requirements from TS ML20081F3471995-03-14014 March 1995 Proposed Improved Ts,Permitting Drywell & Wetwell Purge Valves Isolated by Drywell Radiation Monitor Signal to Be Opened W/Inoperable Drywell Radiation Monitor ML20077S0331995-01-13013 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2558 Mwt ML20077D8921994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed Deleted ETS ML20078G7161994-11-0101 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Current TSs to Improved TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20076L6911994-10-19019 October 1994 Proposed Improved Tech Specs,Rev F ML20149G3751994-10-13013 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering ATWS-RPT Setpoint by Approx 2 Ft 2 Inches Allowing Restarting Recirculation Pump Following RPT When Temp Differential Between Coolant at Reactor Bottom Head & Reactor Steam Dome Cannot Be Obtained ML20073G9631994-09-23023 September 1994 Proposed Improved Ts,Rev E ML20073D3231994-09-20020 September 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Change to Unit 1 TSs Re EDG Operability Requirements During Reactor Shut Down Conditions ML20072V3641994-08-31031 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Standard Ts,Rev D ML20072H0571994-08-16016 August 1994 Proposed TS 3.9.C,allowing Shutdown Operations W/Only One of Two Required EDGs Aligned to Corresponding Core or Containment Cooling Sys ML20072E4021994-08-0808 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev Insertion Instructions Rev C ML20072B7541994-08-0404 August 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Traversing Incore Probe Operability Requirements ML20071H8381994-07-19019 July 1994 Proposed TS 3.3.6.6,allowing Less than Four Traversing in- Core Probe Machines to Be Operable ML20071H6851994-07-0808 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Improved Std Insertion Instructions, Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20069J3101994-06-0707 June 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Planned Testing at Plant to Demonstrate Capability to Operate Plant Up to Core Power Level of 2,558 Mwt ML20059E9231994-01-0606 January 1994 Revised Proposed TS Pages for Increase in Allowable MSIV Leakage Rate & Deletion of MSIV Leakage Control Sys ML20059L2051993-11-0909 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Unit 1,Section 4.9 & Unit 2, Section 4.8 Re Diesel Generator Testing Under Hot Initial Conditions ML20058P8881993-10-19019 October 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Re Time Delay for RPS Electric Power Monitoring Sys Trips ML20046B6061993-07-30030 July 1993 Proposed Tech Specs for Implementation of New 10CFR20 Requirements ML20046B5561993-07-27027 July 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Showing Original & Unrelated Changes Re Removal of Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Trips ML20045E7281993-06-28028 June 1993 Proposed TS 3.7.A.4 & 3.6.4.1 for Units 1 & 2,respectively, Allowing One or More Suppression chamber-drywell Vacuum Breakers to Open During Surveillance Testing 1999-07-29
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20212J2721999-10-0101 October 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying DG Fuel Oil Storage Requirements ML20210G2971999-07-29029 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs LCO 3.1.7 Re Standby Liquid Control Sys ML20210A4041999-07-15015 July 1999 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 1,Extended Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 19 ML20204J6031999-03-19019 March 1999 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Extended Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 15 ML20203C5931999-02-0505 February 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Revising TS to Implement Previously Approved Generic Changes ML20199J9081999-01-21021 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Radiation Monitors ML20197H5171998-12-0404 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 2.1.1.2,deleting Footnote Which Specifies That SLMCPRs Are for Cycle 18 Only & TS Section 5.6.5.b.2 ML20236U2551998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Allowable Values for High Radiation Trip for Reactor Bldg & Refueling Floor Ventilation Exhaust Monitors ML20217A0861998-04-30030 April 1998 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant,Units 1 & 2,Process for Implementing Technical Requirements of 10CFR54,License Renewal Rule HL-5558, Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 181998-02-17017 February 1998 Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 18 ML20197K1861997-12-18018 December 1997 Marked-up Pages to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,respectively. Proposed Changes Delete or Modify Existing License Conditions,Surveillance Requirements That Have Been Completed & Exemptions That Are No Longer in Effect ML20211J1861997-10-0101 October 1997 Corrected TS Pages Unit 1 & 2 Page 3.4-8,Unit 1 Page 3.5-6 & Unit 2 Page 3.5-5 Provided in Order for Util to Issue Amends 208 & 150 to Manual Holders ML20211A2301997-09-19019 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Page 2.0-1 & Corresponding mark-up Page Re SLMCPR ML20210J0491997-08-0808 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2763 Mwt Which Represents Power Level Increase of 8% HL-5438, Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 141997-07-21021 July 1997 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant - Unit 2 Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 14 ML20141B7591997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,revising Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio to Reflect Results of Cycle Specific Calculation Performed for Unit 1 Operating Cycle 18,expected to Commence in Nov 1997 ML20141B8561997-05-0909 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Operability Requirements for Rod Block Monitor Sys HL-5376, Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits1997-04-29029 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.9 Re Reactor Coolant Sys Pressure & Temp Limits ML20133F3641997-01-0707 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Alternate Method of Testing S/Rvs During Shutdown Conditions Rather than During Unit Startup as Is Currently Done ML20138G6271996-12-19019 December 1996 Rev 11 to ODCM for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant ML20132G2261996-12-17017 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re pressure-temp Limits ML20132E0161996-12-13013 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Physical Security & Contigency Plan & Guard Training & Qualification Plan ML20135D4881996-12-0303 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR Values Based Upon Unique plant-evaluations for Current Cycle 13 & Use of GE-13 Fuel in Next Cycle 14 ML20129H9181996-10-29029 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Associating Changes W/Installation of Digital Power Range Neutron Monitoring Sys & Incorporation of long-term Stability Solution Hardware ML20128M8701996-10-0707 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs to Licenses DPR-57 & NPF-5,increasing Nominal Mechanical Pressure Relief Setpoints for All SRVs & Allow Operation W/One SRV & Associated Functions Inoperable ML20113F5541996-09-19019 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Applicability of Certain Surveillances Addressing Rvp & Temp Limits & Replacing Vessel Pressure & Temp Limit Curves W/New Curves ML20117M2251996-09-11011 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Authorizing Southern Nuclear to Become Licensed Operator & to Have Exclusive Responsibility & Control Over Physical Const,Operation & Maint of Plant HL-5192, Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 171996-07-18018 July 1996 Edwin I Hatch Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 17 ML20115J4861996-07-16016 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Changes Through June 1996, Satisfying Requirements of 10CFR50.71 ML20212C1491996-05-31031 May 1996 Stability Monitor ML20117H1391996-05-21021 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5.2,ECCS - Shutdown & 3.5.2.2.b SR for Units 1 & 2 Revise to Change Unit 1 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 13 Feet & Change Unit 2 CST Water Level Requirement from 12 Feet to 15 Feet ML20100P1041996-03-0404 March 1996 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Unit 2 Power Uprate Startup Test Rept for Cycle 13 ML20100H7431996-02-21021 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Changes of Drywell Air Temp LCO from 350 F to 150 F ML20094K3831995-11-10010 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Implementation of 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML20093G9401995-10-0505 October 1995 Inservice Insp Program Third 10-Year Interval for Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 ML20092H6461995-07-24024 July 1995 Ei Hatch Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 IST Program ML20085K4011995-06-20020 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Power Uprate ML20086E8471995-06-19019 June 1995 Rev 0 to Field Disposition Instruction (Fdi) HT2-0121-12900. Fdi Documents Design Requirements & Matl Required to Install Stabilizers for Shroud Horizontal Welds ML20086E8311995-06-0909 June 1995 Rev 0 to Fabrication Spec 25A5719, Fabrication of Shroud Stabilizer ML20086E8141995-06-0606 June 1995 Rev 1 to Code Design Spec 25A5717, Shroud Stabilizers ML20085A1661995-06-0606 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Secondary Containment Draw Down & Vacuum Surveillance Requirement Acceptance Criteria ML20086E8121995-05-17017 May 1995 Rev 0 to Design Spec 25A5718, Shroud Repair Hardware ML20082V3791995-05-0404 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Minimizing Thermal Stratification Events ML20082L3331995-04-14014 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Elimination of Selected Response Time Testing Requirements from TS ML20081F3471995-03-14014 March 1995 Proposed Improved Ts,Permitting Drywell & Wetwell Purge Valves Isolated by Drywell Radiation Monitor Signal to Be Opened W/Inoperable Drywell Radiation Monitor ML20077S0331995-01-13013 January 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Plant to Operate at Uprated Power Level of 2558 Mwt ML20077D8921994-12-0202 December 1994 Proposed Deleted ETS ML20078G7161994-11-0101 November 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Converting Current TSs to Improved TS Consistent w/NUREG-1433 ML20076L6911994-10-19019 October 1994 Proposed Improved Tech Specs,Rev F ML20149G3751994-10-13013 October 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Lowering ATWS-RPT Setpoint by Approx 2 Ft 2 Inches Allowing Restarting Recirculation Pump Following RPT When Temp Differential Between Coolant at Reactor Bottom Head & Reactor Steam Dome Cannot Be Obtained 1999-07-29
[Table view] |
Text
LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION SURVEILLANCE RE0ulRENENTS 3.4. STANDBY L10MID CONTROL SYSTEM 4.4. STAN08Y LIOUID CONTROL SYSTEM I Aeolicability Anoticability The Limiting Conditions for Opera- The Surveillance Requirements apply tion apply to the operating status to the periodic test and examination of the Standby Liquid Control of the Standby Liquid Control System.
System.
Ob.tective Objective The objective of the Limiting The objective of the Surveillance Conditions for Operation is to Requirements is to verify the oper-assure the availability of a ability of the Standby Liquid Control system with the capability to System.
shut down the reactor and main-tain the shutdown condition without the use of control rods.
Snecifications Snecifications A. Normal Svstem Availability A. Normal Doerational Tests During periods when fuel is The operability of the Standby in the reactor and prior to Liquid Control System shall be startup from the Cold Shut- verified by the performance of down Condition the standby the following tests:
Itquid control system shall be operable except:
- 1. When performing control rod 1. Monthly drive maintenance, at which At least once per month each time Specification 3.10.E. pump loop shall be locally shall be met, started and functionally tested by recirculating de-or mineralized water to the test tank.
- 2. When operating with an inoper- 2. Each Goeratina Cvele able component, at which time At least once during each oper-Specification 3.4.0. shall be ating cycle:-
met,
- a. Check that the setting of or the system relief valve is 1325 ! 75 psig.
- 3. When the reactor is in the b. Verify that each pump will Cold Shutdown Condition and deliver 41.2 gpm against a aII control rods capable of system head of at least 1190 normal insertion are inserted psig.
and the requirements of Speci- c. Initiate one of the Standby fication 3.3.A. are met. Liquid Control System loops f rom the control room af ter arranging suction f rom the 1
test tank and pump dominer-
%2]311070206 P
geg 03coji, alized water into the reactor HATCH - UNIT 1 3.4-1
l 8ASES FOR LINITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AN0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIRENENTS 3.4. STAN08Y L10010 CONTROL SYSTEM The standby liquid control (SLC) system provides a backup reactivity control capability to the control rod scram system. The original design l basis for the. standby liquid control system is to provide a soluble boron '
concentration to the reactor vessel sufficient to bring the reactor to a
- cold shutdown. In addition to meeting its original design basis, the 4 system must also satisfy the requirements of the ATWS Rule 10 CFR 50.62 paragraph (c) (4), which requires that the system have a control capacity equivalent to that for a system with an injection rate of 86 gpm of 13 weight percent unenriched sodium pentaborate, normalized to a 251 inch diameter reactor vessel.
To meet its original design basis, the SLC system was designed with a
, sodium pentaborate solution tank, redundant pumps, and redundant explosive
! injection valves. The tank contains a sodium pentaborate solution of sufficient volume, concentration and 81* enrichment to bring the
, reactor to a cold shutdown. The solution is injected into the reactor ;
j vessel using one of the redundant pumps.
The volume limits in Figure 3.4-1 are calculated such that for a given l concentration of sodium pentaborate, the tank contains a volume of solution
! adequate to bring the reactor to a cold shutdown, with margin. These j volume limits are based on gross volume and account for the unusable volume of solution in the tank and suction lines.
~
! To meet 10 CFR 50.62 Paragraph (c) (4), the system must have a reactivity i control capacity equivalent to that of a system with an 86 gpa injection <
i flow rate of 13 weight percent unenriched sodium pentaborate into a 251 j inch diameter reactor vessel. The term " equivalent reactivity control i capacity' refers to the rate at which the boron isotope B18 is injected into the reactor core. The standby liquid control system meets this !
! requirement by using a sodium pentaborate solution enriched with a higher j j concentration of the 85* isotope. The minimum concentration limit of i 6.2 percent sodium pentaborate solution is based on 60 atomic percent :
- B18 enriched boron in sodium pentaborate and a flow rate of 41.2 gpe. l The method used to show equivalence with 10 CFR 50.62 is set forth in '
i NEDE-31096-P (Ref. 1),
i Limiting Conditions for Operation are established based on the redundancy j within the system and the reliability of the control rod scram system.
With the standby liquid control system inoperable, reactor operation for j short periods of time is justified because of the reliability of the control rod scram system. With one redundant component inoperable, reactor operation for longer periods of time is justified because the system could still fulfill its function.
Surveillance requirements are established on a frequency that assures a high system reliability. Thorough testing of the system each operating j cycle assures that the system can be actuated from the control room and I
will develop the flow rate required. Replacement of the explosive charges in the valves at regular intervals assures that these valves will not fail j due to deterioration of the charges. Functional testing of the pumps is j performed once per month to assure pump operability.
i I i l HATCH - UNIT I 3. 4 -4 1
=e--- ,- w -r w i m - ,v_ __wn- ,--,-------em..-.--v
~
BASES FOR LINITING CON 0lfl0NS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIRENENTS 3.4. STANOGY LIQUID CONTROL SYSTEN (Continued)
The sodium pentaborate solution is carefully monitored to assure its reactivity control capability is maintained. The enriched sodium pentaborate so1ution is made by mixing granular, enriched sodium pentaborate wi,th water. Isotopic tests on the granular sodium pentaborate are perforned to verify the actual 818 enrichment, prior to mixing with water. Once the enrichment is established, only the solution concentration, volume and temperature must be monitored to insure that an adequate amount of reactivity control is available.
Determining the solution concentration once per 31 days verifies that the solution has not been diluted with water. Checking the volume once each day will guard against noticeable fluid losses or dilutions, and daily temperature checks will prevent sodium pentaborate precipitation.
- 1. ' Anticipated Transients without scram, Response to NRC ATWS Rule, j 10 CFR 50.62", NEDE-31096-P, December 1985.
4 t
1 HATCH - UNIT 1 3.4-5
i, e
13 i
12 i
', i
! REGION OF REQUIRED VOLUME [
p CONCENTRATION FOR 2 60.0 l 0 11 ATOMIC PERCENT B10 ENRICHED l
- l. g SODIUM PENTA 80 RATE
.a ,
l 0 i s 10 ,
2$
oa c l
l N e
HW z ,
l l 9 l
$h ya oC o@ ,
H ,
I
$8 o
E l E
H I
C U 7 E t
(
(2883 gal 6.M) 0 l
5 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 3800 i GROSS VOLUME OF SOLUTION IN TANK (gal) i l FIGURE 3.41 SODIUM PENTABORATE SOLUTION VOLUME l l
VERSUS CONCENTRATION REQUIREMENTS 1 .
l l
- t f
l
120 g ,
is-
~ '
, l
- I 110 l; f.
l
.m__ m .. .m
}
g_ _... _
, 6.2% m PERMISSIBLE REGION OF
_ OPERATION FOR 2 60.0
. E ATOMIC PERCENT 810 ENRICHED 100 SOOlUM PENTABORATE
_ l _ ._ _.
f I f 1
l.
90
~
l .
~
C - l-o_ g 3
_ LIMITING TEMPERATURE , f g - CONDITION O,F OPER ATION , f oc l]
E -
l 3 70 g.
_ l
~ 1
-SATUR ATION TEMP.
- 1 VS, CONCENTR ATION 60 L lI 1
[ !
- CONSTANT 100F l , MARGIN ABOVE l- , / SATURATION TEMP.
50
. 1
- l
. l.'
I^ ;
40 30 O 5 10 15 20 25 CONCENTRATION (WElGHT PERCENT SODIUM PENTABOR ATE IN SOLUTION)
FIGURE 3.4 2 SOOlUM PENTABOR ATE SOLUTION TEMPERATURE i VERSUS CONCENTRATION REQUIREMENTS
.- - -_-- . . . - _ - - _ _ _ - . _ - - ._.. _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . - _ . . _ _