|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20217K9931999-10-14014 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 234 to License DPR-56 ML20217B4331999-10-0505 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 233 to License DPR-56 ML20216H7091999-09-24024 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 229 & 232 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20212D1281999-09-17017 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Alternatives CRR-03, 05,08,09,10 & 11 ML20211D5501999-08-23023 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 228 & 231 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20206A2921999-04-20020 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Proposed Changes to EALs for PBAPS Are Consistent with Guidance in NUMARC/NESP-007 & Identified Deviations Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.47(b)(4) & App E to 10CFR50 ML20205K7411999-04-0707 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 227 & 230 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20196G7021998-12-0202 December 1998 SER Authorizing Proposed Alternative to Delay Exam of Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Circumferential Welds by Two Operating Cycles ML20155C6071998-10-26026 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 226 to License DPR-44 ML20155C1681998-10-22022 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Alternative Plan for Exam of Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Longitudinal Welds ML20154J2401998-10-0505 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 224 & 228 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154H4771998-10-0505 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 225 & 229 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154G6821998-10-0101 October 1998 SER Related to Request for Relief 01A-VRR-1 Re Inservice Testing of Automatic Depressurization Sys Safety Relief Valves at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Units 2 & 3 ML20154G6631998-10-0101 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 223 & 227 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20153B9651998-09-14014 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 9 to License DPR-12 ML20238F2661998-08-24024 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 222 to License DPR-44 ML20237A7761998-08-10010 August 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulleting 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of RHR Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode ML20236R8281998-07-15015 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Approving Proposed Alternative (one-time Temporary non-Code Repair) Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3) (II) ML20248F4781998-06-0101 June 1998 Corrected Page 1 to SE Supporting Amends 221 & 226 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively.Original Page 1 of SE Had Three Typos ML20247N5351998-05-11011 May 1998 SER Accepting Third 10-year Interval Inservice Program for Pump & Valves for Plant,Units 2 & 3 ML20198L3331997-12-18018 December 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Approval of Proposed Merger of Atlantic Energy,Inc,& Delmarva Power & Light Co ML20212G8301997-10-24024 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 221 & 226 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20198S2161997-10-24024 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Change to Provisions Identified in Rev 14 of PBAPS QAP Description Re Nuclear Review Board Meeting Frequency ML20217J5631997-10-0909 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 225 to License DPR-56 ML20217J6161997-10-0707 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Alternative to Reactor Pressure Vessel Circumferential Weld Insps for Plant,Unit 3 ML20211L6241997-10-0303 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Authorizing Licensee Proposed Use of Code Case N-516-1 to Weld Modified Suction Strainer in Suppression Chamber at Plant ML20217D8161997-09-30030 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 224 to License DPR-56 ML20211D6201997-09-17017 September 1997 SER Accepting VT-2 Examiner Qualification Request for PECO Energy Company,Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Units 2 & 3 ML20216G5601997-09-0404 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 220 & 223 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20217M8001997-08-19019 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 219 & 222 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20149L2841997-07-23023 July 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Relief Request RR-22 for Plant,Units 2 & 3 ISI Program ML20140B0371997-05-30030 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting QAP Description Change ML20135B4111997-02-19019 February 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 218 & 221 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20149L8681996-11-15015 November 1996 SER Accepting Core Spray Piping Insp & Flaw Evaluation for Plant,Unit 2 ML20149L2441996-01-29029 January 1996 Safety Evaluation Accepting Insp & Evaluation Methodology for Operation of Unit 3 Core Shroud for Duration of Current Operating Cycle,Performed in Response to GL 94-03 ML20058F5641993-11-19019 November 1993 SE Accepting Util 930305 Response to NRC Bulletin 90-01, Suppl 1, Loss of Fill-Oil in Transmitters Mfg by Rosemount ML20057B6441993-09-16016 September 1993 SER Concluding That Safe Shutdown Capability at Plant, Satisfies Requirements of Section Iii.G & Iii.L of App R to 10CFR50 ML20126H9031992-12-23023 December 1992 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief from Inservice Insp Requirements for Facilities ML20127N4941992-11-17017 November 1992 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 120-day Response to Suppl 1 to GL 87-02 ML20062C7501990-10-26026 October 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Evaluation of Response to NRC Bulletin 90-002, Loss of Thermal Margin Caused by Channel Box Bow ML20246E0331989-08-21021 August 1989 SER Supporting Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2,1 (Parts 1 & 2).Programs Exist for Identifying safety-related Components Required for Reactor Trip Function & Vendor Interface W/Nmss Vendor for Required Components ML20205A8801988-10-31031 October 1988 Safety Evaluation of Util Plan for Restart of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ML20148P3351988-04-0101 April 1988 SER Accepting Util Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2.1 Re Equipment Classification Program for All safety-related Components ML20148E6301988-01-15015 January 1988 SER Accepting Util 840116,0927 & 850805 Responses to Generic Ltr 82-33,Item 6 Re Compliance w/post-accident Monitoring Instrumentation Guidelines of Reg Guide 1.97 Concerning Emergency Response Facilities ML20236D0541987-10-22022 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Repts on Computer Program Analyses Methods Intended for Use in Part of Plant Core Reload Analyses ML20235D2431987-09-22022 September 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Onsite Storage of Liquid Oxygen & Hydrogen for Implementation of Hydrogen Water Chemistry.Permanent Hydrogen Water Installation Acceptable ML20209H0201987-04-24024 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Re Torus Attached Piping Mods - Mark I Program ML20204C1001986-07-24024 July 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Listed Util Responses & Actions Reviewed During Insp on 840913-19 Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.1,3.1.2,3.2.1,3.2.2 & 4.5.1 ML20141F6071986-04-0808 April 1986 Safety Evaluation Granting Util Requests for Relief from Inservice Insp Requirements of ASME Code,Section XI ML20209C3141986-03-20020 March 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Shroud Head Connection Replacement at Facility,Per Util 860107 Submittal 1999-09-24
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217K9931999-10-14014 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 234 to License DPR-56 ML20217B4331999-10-0505 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 233 to License DPR-56 ML20217G3541999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20216H7091999-09-24024 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 229 & 232 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20212D1281999-09-17017 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Alternatives CRR-03, 05,08,09,10 & 11 ML20212A5871999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Peach Bottom,Units 2 & 3.With ML20211D5501999-08-23023 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 228 & 231 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20212H6311999-08-19019 August 1999 Rev 2 to PECO-COLR-P2C13, COLR for Pbaps,Unit 2,Reload 12 Cycle 13 ML20210N7641999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Jul 1999 for PBAPS Units 2 & 3. with ML20209H1121999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20195H8841999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20206N1661999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20206A2921999-04-20020 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Proposed Changes to EALs for PBAPS Are Consistent with Guidance in NUMARC/NESP-007 & Identified Deviations Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.47(b)(4) & App E to 10CFR50 ML20205K7411999-04-0707 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 227 & 230 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20205P5851999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3.With ML20207G9971999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3.With ML20199E3471998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Peach Bottom,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205K0381998-12-31031 December 1998 PECO Energy 1998 Annual Rept. with ML20206P1651998-12-31031 December 1998 Fire Protection for Operating Nuclear Power Plants, Section Iii.F, Automatic Fire Detection ML20206D3651998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 PBAPS Annual 10CFR50.59 & Commitment Rev Rept. with ML20206D3591998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 PBAPS Annual 10CFR72.48 Rept. with ML20196G7021998-12-0202 December 1998 SER Authorizing Proposed Alternative to Delay Exam of Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Circumferential Welds by Two Operating Cycles ML20196E8261998-11-30030 November 1998 Response to NRC RAI Re Reactor Pressure Vessel Structural Integrity at Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3 ML20198B8591998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20206R2571998-11-17017 November 1998 PBAPS Graded Exercise Scenario Manual (Sections 1.0 - 5.0) Emergency Preparedness 981117 Scenario P84 ML20198C6751998-11-0505 November 1998 Rev 3 to COLR for PBAPS Unit 3,Reload 11,Cycle 12 ML20195E5341998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20155C6071998-10-26026 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 226 to License DPR-44 ML20155C1681998-10-22022 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Alternative Plan for Exam of Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Longitudinal Welds ML20155H7721998-10-12012 October 1998 Rev 1 to COLR for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2, Reload 12,Cycle 13 ML20154J2401998-10-0505 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 224 & 228 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154H4771998-10-0505 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 225 & 229 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154G6821998-10-0101 October 1998 SER Related to Request for Relief 01A-VRR-1 Re Inservice Testing of Automatic Depressurization Sys Safety Relief Valves at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Units 2 & 3 ML20154G6631998-10-0101 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 223 & 227 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154H5541998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20153B9651998-09-14014 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 9 to License DPR-12 ML20151Y2901998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20238F2661998-08-24024 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 222 to License DPR-44 ML20237B9531998-08-10010 August 1998 Specification for ISI Program Third Interval,Not Including Class Mc,Primary Containment for Bpaps Units 2 & 3 ML20237A7761998-08-10010 August 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulleting 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of RHR Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode ML20237A5351998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 ML20236R8281998-07-15015 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Approving Proposed Alternative (one-time Temporary non-Code Repair) Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3) (II) ML20236M3471998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 ML20249C4791998-06-0202 June 1998 Rev 6 to COLR for PBAPS Unit 2 Reload 11,Cycle 12 ML20248F4781998-06-0101 June 1998 Corrected Page 1 to SE Supporting Amends 221 & 226 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively.Original Page 1 of SE Had Three Typos ML20248F7441998-05-31031 May 1998 Reactor Vessel Working Group,Response to RAI Regarding Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity ML20248M3001998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 ML20247N5351998-05-11011 May 1998 SER Accepting Third 10-year Interval Inservice Program for Pump & Valves for Plant,Units 2 & 3 ML20249C4751998-05-0707 May 1998 Rev 5 to COLR for PBAPS Unit 2 Reload 11,Cycle 12 ML20247G0721998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
._
p
("soug\ UNITED STATES g
, "; NUCLEAR RE2ULATCRY CEMMISSIEN
. 'j' WASHINGTON, D.C. 80M6-0001
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION VT-2 EXAMINER OVAllFICATION REllEF RE00ESI PECO ENERGY COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION. UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-277 AND 50-278
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The technical specifications for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS),
Units 2 and 3, state that the inservice inspection of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components shall be performed in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel l
Code and applicable addenda as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal been granted by the Commission pursu) ant to 10 CFR Paragraph 50.55a(g)(6)(i).Reaulatio 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3) states that alternatives to the requirements of paragraph (g) may be used, when authorized by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC),
if (i) the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety or ii compliance with the specified requirements would result in hardship or unu(su)al difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4), ASME Code Class 1, 2, and 3 components (including supports provisions and the p)reservice examination requirements, set forth in the ASMEshall me Code,Section XI, " Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components," to the extent practical within the limitations of component design, geometry, and materials of construction. The regulations require that inservice examination of components and system pressure tests conducted during the first 10-year interval, and subsequent intervals, comply with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of Section XI of the ASME Code incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) 12 months prior to the start of the 120-month interval, subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein. The applicable ASME Code,Section XI, for the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, second 10-year inservice inspection (ISI) interval is the 1980 Edition through Winter 1981 addenda. The components (including supports) may meet the requirements set forth in subsequent editions and addenda of the ASME Code incorporated by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b) subject to the limitations and modifications listed therein and subject to Commission approval.
9709290185 970917 PDR ADOCK 05000277 P PDR
.h
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(5), if the licensee determines that conformance with an examination requirement of Section XI of the ASME Code is not practical for its facility, information shall be submitted to the Commission in support of that determination and a request made for relief from the ASME Code requirement. After evaluation of the determination, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a '
alternative re(g)[6)(1),
qunrementsthe Commission may grant that are determined torelief and may impose be authorized by law, will not endanger life, property, or the common defense and security, and are otherwise in the public interest, giving due consideration to the burden upon the licensee that could result if the requirements were imposed.
In the July 21, 1997, letter to the NRC, PECO Energy Company requested relief from the applicable ASME Code,Section XI, paragraph IWA-2300, concerning VT-2 examination personnel qualification requirements. PECO Energy Company requested approval to implement ASME Code Case N-546, " Alternative Requirements for Qualification of VT-2 Examination Personnel," in their 151 l program during the current inspection interval. The NRC staff has reviewed '
and evaluated the licensee's request for relief and the proposed alternative pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3)(1) for the Peach Bottom plant during the current inspection interval.
2.0 DISCUSSION
Reauest for Authorization to Imolement Alternatives to Code Reauirements C9ntained in Code Case N-546. Alternative Reavirements for Qualification of VT-2 Visual Examination Personnel M t.Reauirement: Section XI, IWA-2300, requires that personnel performing VT-2 and VT-3 visual examinations be qualified in accordance with comparable levels of competency as defined in ANSI N45.2.6. Additionally, the examination personnel shall have natural or corrected near distance vision acuity, in at least one eye, equivalent to a Snellen fraction of 20/20. For far vision, personnel shall have natural or corrected far distance visual acuity of 20/30 or equivalent.
Licensee's Code Relief Reaues1: The licensee has requested approval to implement alternatives to the Code requirements contained in Code Case N-546, Alternative Requirement for Qualification of VT-2 Examination Personnel, which is not yet approved by the NRC by reference in RG 1.147.
Licensee's Basis for Relief: (Asstated)
" Code Case N-546 allows experienced plant personnel such as licensed and nonlicensed operators, local leak rate personnel, system engineers, and inspection and nondestructive examination personnel to perform VT-2 visual examinations without having to be certified to comparable levels of competency defined in ANSI N45.2.6. The PECO Energy Company individuals performing the visual examinations will be subject to the conditions provided in Code Case N-546.
3 i
specifically, the examination personnel will have at least 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> of plant walkdciu experience, receive a minimum of four hours of training on section XI requirements and plant specific and will pass the vision procedures for VT-2 test requirements visual examinations, of IWA-2321, 1995 edit ion.
In addition to the requirements in Code Case N-546, PECO Energy Company has i l
procedures to assure that consistent VT-2 visual examinations are performed. PECO Enerfly Company will continue to document the l and visual activity of persons selected qualifications, to perform the VT-2train exam < nglnations and maintain records that verify all of- the requirements in the Code Case as specified herein, are, met. This alternative to the current code requirements alleviates the need to contract certified VT-2 personnel to perform these examinations and reduces the administrative burden of maintaining an extensive Section XI qualification and certification provam for VT-2 examination personnel.'
Licensee's Alternate Provisions: (As stated)
"PECO Energy Company will mut the requirements contained in Code Case N-546. Additionally, PECO Energy Company has formal procedures so that consistent VT-2 visual examinations are performed, and will document and maintain records to verify that persons selected as VT-2 examiners are qualified. Use of this code case will provide a comparable level of quality and safety to
-that currently in place for VT-2 visual examinations."
3.0 EVALUATION
The ASME Code,Section XI, IWA-2300, requires that VT-2 visual examination sersonnel be qualified to comparable levels of competency as daf!ned in ANSI 145.2.6. The Code also requires that the examination personnel be qualified for near and far distance vision acuity. PECO Energy company proposes to implement the alternatives provided in Code Case N-546. In addition, the licensu will implement formal procedures to ensure that consistent VT-2 visual examinations are performed. The licensee will also document and maintain records to verify that persons selected are qualified by meeting the following requirements of Code Case N-546:
- 1. At least 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> plant walkdown experience, such as that gained by-licensed and non-licensed _ operators, local leak rate personnel -
system engineers, and inspection and nondestructive examination personnel.
- 2. At least 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of training on Section XI requirements and plant specific procedures for VT-2 visual examination.
- 3. Vision test requirements of IWA-2321, 1995 Edition.
. 4 The qualification requirements in Code Case N-546 are comparable to those qualifications required for VT-2 visual examiner certification. Furthermore, all licensed and non-licensed operators, local leak rate personnel, system engineers, and inspection and nondestructive examination personnel typically have a sound working knowledge of plant components and piping layouts. Hence, 4
the plant personnel with such background are acceptable candidates for
- performing VT-2 visual examinations.
Since the licensee will implement formal procedures to obtain consistent VT-2 visual examination results even with the varied experience levels and will document the qualifications, training, and visual acuity of persons selected to perform the VT-2 visual examinations, the proposed alternative will provide an acceptable level of quality.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Based on a review of Code Case N-546, the staff has determineo that the
) alternatives to the Code qualification requirements for examination personnel, in conjunction with the licensee's added provisions, will provide an
~
acceptable level of quality and safety. Therefore, the licensee's request to impler.ent alternatives provided in Code Case N-546 is authorized pursuant to
' 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(1). Use of Code Case N-546 is authorized for the current intersal at the above mentioned plants, until such time as the Code Case is approved by reference in RG 1.147. At that time, if the licensee intends to 7
continue to implement this Code Case, the licensee is to follow all provisions in Code Case N-546 with limitations issued in RG 1.147, if any.
Principal Contributor: P. Patnaik Date: September 17. 1997 1
1
,.-.m, -r,,, , ---es =-e-- ,--- 'e = e~~"s" -= * "# * - ' - ' " ' ' ' - " - * " " * * ' * ' ' ~- ~ - ' ' ' "