ML20209E510

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Violation from Insp on 870307-0409
ML20209E510
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/23/1987
From: Reyes L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20209E463 List:
References
50-302-87-10, NUDOCS 8704300065
Download: ML20209E510 (1)


Text

- -___

ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Florida Power Corporation Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River Unit 3 License No. DPR-72 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted on March 7

- April 9,1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved the failure to perform Technical Specification surveillance require-ments. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1987), the violation is listed below:

Technical Specification 4.3.3.6 requires that the post accident monitoring instrumentation, including instrument recorders, be demonstrated operable by the performance of monthly channel checks and quarterly or refueling interval channel calibrations.

Contrary to the above, as of April 2,1987, monthly channel checks on the recorders for the following post accident monitoring instrumentation were not performed: Power Range Nuclear Flux, Source Range Nuclear Flux, Reactor Coolant Outlet Temperature, and Borated Water Storage Tank Level.

In addition, quarterly channel calibrations for the Power Range Nuclear l Flux recorder and refueling interval calibration of the Reactor Coolant Total Flow Rate recorder were not performed.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement I).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Florida Power Corporation is hereby required tc submit to this Office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply including:

(1) admission or denial of the alleged violation; (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Luis A. Reyes, Director Division of Reactor Projects I

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 23rd day of April 19 87 8704300065 870423 PDR ADOCK CS000302 G PDR I