ML20209B348

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Reactor Operator & Senior Reactor Operator Exams Administered at Facility on 861208.Learning Objectives Stated in Supplied Training Matl Not Used in Question Selection & Memorization of Tech Specs Inappropriate
ML20209B348
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/1986
From: Mcconnell T
DUKE POWER CO.
To: Munroe J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20209B266 List:
References
NUDOCS 8704280417
Download: ML20209B348 (28)


Text

.

i:

,[. I. ENCLOSURE 3 s J DUKE POWER COMPANY MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION Po 1 sox 4sek CORNELIUS. N.C. 28o31 o488 TELEPHONE:470488751357 December 10, 1986 l Mr. John Munroe, Chief

Operator Licensing Section U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 l

l

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station Review of Written Licensing Exams

Dear Sir:

Attached are our specific comments on the RO and SRO written examinations administered here on December 8, 1986. In addition, we also have these general concerns:

1. It appears that the learning objectives stated in our supplied training material were not used in selection of appropriate questions. Several questions appear to have been taken from the body of lesson plans and do not relate to the learning objectives for that lesson. This is inappropriate since our systematic approach to training is based on learning objectives. Lesson plans contain material that is beyond the expected learning objectives, and we strongly feel that questions on exams should be related to learning objectives.

4

^

, 2. It appears that several questions require the verbatim memorization of Tech i Spec action statements that give the operator greater than one hour to take i the appropriate action. We feel that expecting memorization of this type information, which is available for reference in the control room, is ,

inappropriate.

i 8704280417 870403 PDR ADOCK 05000369 V PDR

)

c. .

.+

t '

' > Raview of Written Licensing Exam Pag 2 2 December 10', 1986

, *- 6 If you need clarification on any of these items, please call Gary Gilbert at (704) 857-1357.

Very truly yours, len.2.175G,aff Tony . McConnell Manager McGuire Nuclear Station GDG/srt cc: Bill Griffin R. B. Travis W. O. Reeside P. F. 9.2 Attachment s

s 6

1 1

I

' ,. , 1 Page 1 ]

. s MCGUIRE REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION 12/08/86 REVIEW GROUP COMMENTS SECTION 1 Question 1.02a Comment Test answer key reflects wrong answer.

Recommendation Change answer key to read DBW is more negative.

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-RT-RCO, page 34 Lesson Plan reads "Overall effect of core age is that differential boron worth will get continually more negative from BOL to EOL. This is reflected by the DBW curve in the Data Book.

(Data Book Curve 6.2)

Question 1.05 Comment Test answer key reflects wrong answer.

Recommendation .

Change answer key to read: 1. Void coefficient

2. Doppler power coefficent
3. Moderator Temp. coefficient Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-RT-RCO, Handout MC-CP-RCO-7

(F .

9 i

Pago 2 t L Question 1.06 Comment We feel that the explanations given in the answer key are incorrect.

Recommendation For all answers a, b, c, d explanations reference the Data Book Curve 6.5 that indicates the plant conditions that affect shutdown margin which is burnup, Tave, Boron concentration.

Rod height has no affect on shutdown margin.

Justification

1. Data Book curve 6.5
2. Lesson Plan OP-MC-RT-RB, page 14 through 18 Question 1.07 comment We feel that 1/2 of the required answer by the test answer key is not related to question asked. The question only asks "How" and not "Why".

Recommendation Delete the second part of the test answer given for this questicn and allow full credit for the first part which fully answers the question asked.

Justification he feel that, as indicated above, the first part of the test answer given fully answers the question asked.

l

'M w em'-'+= ,e=

  • e ;*

Page 3 8  %

SECTION 2 Question 2.02c Comment We feel that the required answer by the test answer key is not related to question asked. The question did not ask for the individual NC Pump components. It only asks for additional actions that could occur upon Containment Phase B Isolation signal.

Recommendation We feel you should also accept "the Isolation of the KC System or RN System cooling to the NC pumps" for full credit.

Justification We feel that, as indicated above, the test answer given fully answers the question asked.

Question 2.03b comment Test answer key reflects wrong answer.

Recommendation Change answer to read:

High head injection (CCPs) System pressure Accumulators (CLAs) 600 + -50 psig Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-ECC-CLA, page 6, 1.3 A.l.d, page 9, 1.4.b.2 Lesson Plan: OP-MC-PS-NV, page 28 l

l i

_ _ . _. ._ . _ = _ _ . _ _ . . __ _ . _ . . ._ _. - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

4 ,.- >*

Page 4 Question 2.04c Comment i

We feel that Part C to this question was not specific enough to require the answer indicated by the test key. The answer is only

for pressurizer spray provided by the NC pumps.

Recommendation The actual answers provided by the students may include the pressure difference developed by the NV pumps and ND pumps which ,

is pressurizer Aux. spray supplies.

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-SPS-SY-NC, page 15, 9.e and 9.f i

Question 2.07 j comment j

We feel this question is beyond the scope of required Reactor 1 Operator knowledge.

h l Recommendation l

We recommend this qu4stion be removed.

I i Justification l Lesson Plan: OP-MC-IC-IRE

! No Lesson Plan objectives and Lesson Plan does not provide a clear answer to this question. (Operator is required to know i

the cause of the Urgent Alarm, but is not required to know the i condition that cause the individual failures.)

i i

j i i

t l

! i l

l l

i

e Pago 5

. t Question 2.08b comment The answer key does not reflect all the possible automatic actions that can occur if the tube leak continues, i

Recommendation We recommend that an acceptable answer should also be " EMF-46 Trip II alarm is received on high activity in the KC System, it i

will automatically close the KC surge tank vent".

Justification i Lesson Plan: OP-MC-SPS-SY-KC, page 10, 7.b i

j Question 2.14 I comment 1 The answer key does not rcflect the correct answer.

f Recommendation Change answer key to read: a. 12

b. 12
c. 33 l

' d. 57 i

The answer should be based on the answer the student indi-i cates in (a). The answer in (a) will dictate the NV System flow i balance values for b, c, and d.

i Justification i 1 The answer key has an incorrect assumption that seal leakoff flow decreases at the same proportion as seal injection flow

decreases. This assumption is wrong because seal leakoff flow 4 is based on the #1 seal gap clearance which is dependent upon the #1 seal pressure difference.

l i

1

Pcga 6

. i Question 2.15 Comment We feel it is beyond the required operator knowledge to memorize relief valve setpoints and the answer key does not reflect all the possible correct answers.

Recommendation Full credit should be received for five relief valves that discharge to the PRT without including the setpoints and the answer key should include the following relief valves:

1. NS pump suction relief
2. NI pump suction relief
3. NI, NV, NS relief valves Contact the McGuire Nuclear Station Training Organization for any answer in question (704)875-2961.

Justification I

Lesson Plan: OP-MC-SPS-SYS-NC No Lesson Plan objectives and Lesson Plan does not provide a clear answer to this question.

l

. .,+

Pag @ 7 SECTION 3 i

l Question 3.01a Comment The answer key may be misleading, since the student response may be that only NV-2 closes for Part 1 of answer a.

Recommendation l

We recommend that the student be given full credit if he states j that only NV-2 closes for Part 1 of answer a. t t

2 Justification i Lesson Plan: OP-MC-PS-ILE, Handout MC-ILE-4 i

Question 3.03 Comment The answer key is not complete.

Recommendation j The answer key should also include Incore ThermocoupPs Indica-

'l tions.

)

j Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-CP-AD, Handout MC-SYS-SSF-2, 9-12-85 l

l Question 3.04b

]

Comment The answer key does not reflect the answer the question asks for.

i i Recommendation The condition 2/4 Lo Lo Level in 2/4 SG's with Blackout I signal will result in the student including many answers associa-ted with a Blackout signal. Example of this would be the D/G '

sequencer actuation on a Blackout signal. This should be considered in the students' answers. l 1 Justification The question asks for all the initial automatic actions that I occur for each signal.

i

_ , , . , - . _ , . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . - _ _ _ _ _ . - - . . - - . _ . . . . _ _ . _ ~. ,-_ .- _ _ _ , - . _ , , _ - - . - . . . _ ,

e' Page 8 -

Question 3.06 Comment The answer key does not include all possible correct answers.

Recommendation Include as a correct answer for full credit: No, containment spray will not occur because containment pressure is less than the CPCS setpoint of .35 psig."

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-ECC-NS, page 11, 1.5.A.1 Question 3.08a and 3.08d Comment The answer key reflects the wrcng answer.

Recommendation Change the answer key to read:

a. Rods will move out because Tref > Tave and the Temperature Error signal is the dominant signal between power mismatch and temperature error.
d. Rods move in because Tref < Tave and Tref is decreasing due to turbine load decrease. This is the dominant signal and the power mismatch signal t

will also move rods in.

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-IC-IRK, page 16, 1.4.B and page 14, Sect. G 1

l l

i

Paga 9 Question 3.13b Comment The student may answer the question between a possible range of 365 psig to 400 psig.

Recommendation Change answer key range to: "365 psig to 400 psig" Justification The test procedures at MNS accepts as a valid test lift pressure a value between 365 psig and 400 psig. The operators may answer the question with these values. There has been a recent incident at MNS in which a PORV operated at approximately 365 psig while in the low pressure. mode of operation. This incident is being incorporated into the Pzr Pressure Control Lesson Plan.

Question 3.16 Comment Answer key does not reflect all possible answers.

Recommendation Add to list of answers: P/A Converter Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-IC-IRE, page 23, Sect. 3.e i Question 3.17 Comment l l

The answer key does not reflect correct answer. The NV Lesson Plan reference has an incorrect value for VCT Lo Level auto swap.

Recommendation The correct value should be 1%. We recommend that you accept either 1% or 1.4%. This setpoint error will be corrected in the NV Lesson Plan.

Justification

! Annunciator Response Procedure: OP/1/A/6100/10H Panel AD7-D3

Paga 10 SECTION 4 Question 4.01 .

Comment Answer key is wrong.

Recommendation Change the answer key to read #2.

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-SPS-IC-SPD, page 8 Question 4.02b comment The answer key does not reflect all the possible correct answers. The answer key only reflects case I of the NC Pump Malfunction Procedure.

Recommendation Include the following pump trip conditions in addition to the answers on the answer key for full credit:

Shaft vibration > 20 mils Frame vibration > 5 mils Motor Bearing Temp. > 195'F Stator Winding Temp. > 311*F Any three conditions acceptable for full credit. l l

Justification 1 AP/1/A/5500/08 Malfunction of NC Pump requires the operator to trip the NC pump if any of these conditions exist.

l

Pcgs 11  !

f 1

Question 4.03b Comment We feel it is beyond the required knowledge of the operator to memorize specific steps of the subsequent action section of procedures.

Recommendation We recommend that you accept for full credit the following answer: 1. Start two boric acid transfer pumps

2. Open emergency boration control valve (NV-265)

Justification I The operator has all the Abnormal Procedures available for reference in the control Room for specific step sequence.

4 Question 4.10

, Comment The answer key is not complete.

Recommendation Include in the answer key: 4. If turbine will not trip, then close all S/G SM Isolation

! Valves.

Justification AP/1/A/5500/01 Reactor Trip, page 3 Question 4.12.b.2 l Comment 1

We feel this question is beyond the acope of required operator j knowledge.

Recommendation We recommend this question be removed.

Justification In accordance with Station Health Physics Manual and actual Station practice, this calculation will be performed by Health PhyL.vs. Refer to the MNS Health Physics Manual, Section 2.1.6.

, _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ _ , - _ _ - _ _,. __ - -.m__, - - . -

. .y Pcgn 12 Question 4.15 Comment We feel that the student should receive full credit if he states

" Manually exercise Reactor Trip Breakers".

Recommendation Accept " Manually exercise Reactor Trip Breakers" for full credit in answer #1 on the answer key.

l Justification

" Manually exercise Reactor Trip Breakers" fully answers the question asked.

1 l

I i

a i

i i

I l

~ T Paga 1 MCGUIRE SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION 12/08/86 REVIEW GROUP COMMENTS i

SECTION 5 l

Question 5.03 b comment Test answer key reflects wrong answer.

Recommendation Change answer key to read: Increase Justification QPTR by Tech. Spec. definition cannot be < 1; and the answer stated is for the Quadrant QPTR that had the divider barrier failure.

Question 5.04a Comment There are too many answers in the answer key. There are only four questions and there are five answers.

Recommendation We feel the correct answers are: 1. No effect

2. No effect
3. Higher
4. No effect - if change occurs and does not effect the total reacti-vity balance; or Higher - if the change l effects the total reacti-vity balance.

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-SPS-RT-RB, page 11 through 13  ;

i

. _ _ . _ . _ . . . . _ . . _ . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . _ . . - ~ . -_. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . . _ . . - . _ .

i Pcgs 2 t'

l i

Question 5.15 s

Comment

Test answer key reflects wrong answer.

Recommendation Change answer key to read: 1. Void coefficient

2. Doppler power coefficent
3. Moderator Temp. coefficient Justification

! Lesson Plan: OP-MC-RT-RCO, Handout MC-CP-RCO-7 f

l I

i l  !

4

(

l 4

I 1

3

< l l

i  !

~

i 6

i I

i

l Pago 3 i

SECTION 6 ,

Question 6.02 comment Part a: The answer key reflects a direct quote from the Lesson Plan body.

Part b: We feel this is beyond the required operator knowledge.

Recommendation Part a: We feel any reasonably worded answer should receive i full credit.

i 2

Part b: We feel this question should be removed from the test.

1 Justification Part a: We feel that any reasonably worded answer will fully answer the question asked.

Part b: The power supplies are located on the Control Board for i operator reference.

l l t

Question 6.03a l comment i

The answer key does not reflect all possible answers, i

i Recommendation i

We recommend that either NC System pressure or Charging Pump 1

Discharge Pressure be accepted as a full credit answer.

I Justification NV Pump discharge pressure will be slightly > NC System pressure at the pump seals.

1 t

l i

i i

1 i

! l 1

l l

i

g e g Pago 4 1 Question 6.04 Comment We feel it is beyond the required operator knowledge to memorize relief valve setpoints and the answer key does not reflect all the possible correct answers, j L

Recommendation i Full credit should be received for five relief valves that discharge to the PRT without including the setpoints and the answer key should include the following relief valves:

1. NS pump suction relief
2. NI pump suction relief
3. NI, NV, NS relief valves

- Contact the McGuire Nuclear Station Training Organization for any answer in question (704)875-2961.

l Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-SPS-SYS-NC No Lesson Plan objectives and Lesson Plan does not provide a

clear answer to this question.

l Question 6.05c Comment i

The answer key does not reflect all the possible automatic

actions that can occur if the tube leak continues.

! Recommendation

! We recommend that an acceptable answer should also be " EMF-46

'- Trip II alarm is received on high activity in the KC System, it i will automatically close the KC surge tank vent".

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-SPS-SY-KC, page 10, 7.b i

i i

. .~

Pago 5 Question 6.06c Comment Answer key does not reflect all possible answers.

Recommendation Add to list of answers: P/A Converter Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-IC-IRE, page 23, rect. 3.c Question 6.07 comment The answer key is not complete.

Recommendation The answer key should also include Incore Thermocouple Indica-tions.

Justification Lesson Plan: OP-MC-CP-AD, Handout MC-SYS-SSF-2, 9-12-85

Question 6.11 Comment
1. The answer key and test have incorrect point values.
2. We feel it is beyond the required operator knowledge to memorize alarm setpoints.
3. We feel the answer key does not reflect the question asked.

Recommendation

1. We recommend the correction of the point values.
2. We recommend the removal of the question.
3. If question is maintained on the test, the acceptable answer for the basis should be to prevent exceeding the Tech. Spec.

LCO limits.

Justification Lesson Plan OP-MC-ECC-CLA No Lesson Plan objectives and Lesson Plan does not provide a clear answer to this question.

Ptg3 6 Question 6.14 Comment Test answer key reflects wrong answer.

Recommendation

! Change answer to read:

High head injection (CCPs) System pressure Accumulators (CLAs) 600 + -50 psig Justification i

Lesson Plan: OP-MC-ECC-CLA, page 6, 1.3 A.1.d, page 9, 1.4.b.2 i Lesson Plan: OP-MC-PS-NV, page 28 ,

Question 6.15 Comment The answer key does not include all possible correct answers.

3 Recommendation

! Include as a correct answer for full credit: No, containment spray will not occur because containment pressure is less than j

the CPCS setpoint of .35 psig."

Justification Lesson Plant OP-MC-ECC-NS, page 11, 1.5.A.1 2

i i

I

.V Pagn 7 SECTION 7 Question 7.02 comment We feel it is beyond the required knowledge of the operator to memorize specific steps of operating procedures.

Recommendation We feel an acceptable answer to receive full credit is:

" Insert control rods and refer to Operating Procedure" Justification The operators will have the Operating Procedure in the Control Room while performing the Unit startup.

Question 7.04

! Comment We feel that the student should receive full credit if he states

" Manually exercise Reactor Trip Breakers".

Recommendation Accept " Manually exercise Reactor Trip Breakers" for full credit

in answer #1 on.the answer key.

Justification

" Manually exercise Reactor Trip Breakers" fully answers the question asked.

I

. '. Pcgo 8 Question 7.05 at comment The answer key does not address the condition if containment pressure is greater than 3 psig.

Recommendation Accept either the answer on the answer key or the following answer: "If containment pressure is > 3 psig and core exit thermocouples are increasing and pressurizer PORV's are open or if pressurizer pressure is > 2335 psig PORV setpoint".

Accept either answer for full credit.

I Justification EP/1/A/5000/09 Loss of All AC Power, RNO for > 3 psig 1

l j Question 7.06q comment The assumption stated in the answer key of 3000 R/Hr. was not

j. found in the reference material.

i Recommendation We feel that any reasonable assumption should be accepted for I the dose rate and method of calculation.

i

, Justification -

i

! There are numerous values for the dose rate of an uncovered Fuel Assembly existing throughout the industry such as 6 In addition, other effects such as scatter 10 R/Hr. at 1 ft.

i will affect the dose rate of some calculation from the source.

, The question is vague enough to allow at least two approaches to the calculation.

i

?

4 1

t

  • . j

-; .. 1 Page 9 Question 7.07a Comment The answer key specifies that the "A" CF control valve 4

be placed in manual.

i 1 Recommendation

We recommend that the acceptable answer should be "All CF Control valves be placed in Manual".

Justification l AP/5500/16 specifies that all valves be placed in manual. .In

, addition, the "A" Channel (N-41) will input both "A" and "D" S/G level program.

i i

Question 7.15b Comment 4

l Written permission should not be a required response to this question, j Recommendation l We recommend that you remove " written permission received" from the answer key.

4 i Justification The context of the que'stion is such that the 10CFR20 requirements

! for exceeding the basic 1.25 Rem /qtr limit will be the response '

! rather than the administrative requirements for dose extension.

j 10CFR20 does not require written permission.

{ 1 4

l i

i

.. . ~ . _ . _ . . . .

Page 10

.. w

  • Question 7.16b Comment We feel it is beyond the required knowledge of the operator to memorize specific steps of the subsequent action section of

+ procedures.

Recommendation We recommend that you accept for full credit lhe followi~ng ^ '

1 answer: 1. Start two boric acid transfer pumps

2. Open emergency boration control valve (NV-265)

Justification The operator has all the Abnormal Procedures available,for i reference in the Control Room for specific step sequence.

.d-i <

l 1

1

)

t s

$ 9 4

^. j

~

l

.s

{

t.- #

1

.- , . , , , . _ . _ - . , . - . ~ . - . _ , , _ , . . , _ , _._,r._ , __ _ _ _ - . . , _ . _ _ - . - . _. _

~ '

Page 11 U '

< -e - j SECTION 8 j I

Question 8.05b. i comment i L The answer key reflects an answer based on OMP 1-7. This is I misleading since the question context is referenced to Tech.

Specs.

Recommendation The acceptable answer should reference the Tech. Spec. minimum Shift crew statement for full credit'that reads:

- "The Fire Brigade shall not include"three members of the minimum shift crew necessary ... or the answer stated in the answer key.

i Justification

.s j. Tech. Spec. Section 6.2.2..e, page 6-1 4

i Question 8.10b

Comment 1

We feel that this is beyond the required knowledge of the

- operator to recite a four hour Tech. Spec. action statement j

on a' written exam and assigning 1/2 of the. total point i value of the question to that answer.

Recommendation We recommend that this question be removed from the test.

Justification MNS expectation of the students is to be knowledgeable of one 4

hour or less action statements and the Tech. Specs. are available l l' to the operator in the Control Room at all times. '

l l

i

?

+

O

.; i

- ._ . __ . . , . - - . _ , , , _ _ . . . _ - _ . - - .m . . _ _ _ . . _ , - _ . , , . . _ . _ , - -

~ '

Page 12 t.= -

Question 8.11d Comment "RCP seal leakage" is a vague statement and could be mis-interpreted to mean leakage from the seals or seal injection supplied to the seals.

Recommendation 1 We recommend that you accept either " controlled leakage" or

" identified leakage" as a full credit answer.

Justification Tech. Spec. definition of control leakage is that seal injection supplied to the NC pumps and seal leakage (leakoff) is defined as identified leakage.

Question 8.15a Comment The answer key is not complete and incorrect.

Recommendation We recommend that is addition to the turnover sheet, you should also accept the R and R Log Book. Also, the Shift Supervisor Log Book is an unacceptable answer.

Justification OMP 2-2 and OMP 2-4 does not require specific logging of equipment that is out of service to be entered in the Shift Supervisor Log Book.

e f

- - . _ , . - - . - - - . - - - - . - - --+ - - - , . -

- , _ -. --.,..-e - _ . - . - , - - - - , . - , - . - - - . - - - ~

-, . v-

... ,~

Page 13 1

.. a c I

Question 8.16b Comment We feel that this is beyond the required knowledge of.the operator to recite a two hour and a four hour Tech. Spec.

2 action statement on a written exam and assigning 2/3 of the total point value of the question to that answer, j

1 Recommendation

! We recommend that this question be removed from the test.

, Justification MNS expectation of the students is to be knowledgeable of one hour or less action statements and the Tech. Specs, are available

< to the operator in the Control Room at all times.

4 I

i

! Question 8.17 1

Comment j We feel this question is beyond the required operator knowledge s and inappropriate for the following reasons:

1. Operation group is not responsible for determining or making Tech. Spec. reports.
2. There is no correct answer for part (a).

Recommendation (

} We recommend that this question be removed from the test.

1 3

Justification '

Tech. Spec. Section 6 and Station Directiv$ 2.8.1 (see i attachment of Station Directive 2.8.1)

}

1  :

l J

8 l

Page 14  !

ros ~

Question 8.21 Comment There is a typo in the answer key.

Recommendation Change the answer key to read: "c" Justification Station Directive 1.2.0 and Exam Bank Question reference (refer to Exam Bank question attachment) i i

)

l i 1 l

I

-__,r. -. __ _ _ . _ ,. _ _ . _ . _ _ ._ , . . _ - . ..____ ___.___ _,- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , , . _ _ . . _ _ . , -

_