ML20207L266
| ML20207L266 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 10/06/1988 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207L269 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8810170264 | |
| Download: ML20207L266 (3) | |
Text
.-
ll l
~
Duke her Company flu R han PO Box 3319f nce1 % ident CharVtre, N C 28242 Nuclear ProJxtion
(?O4)373 till DUKEPOWER l
October 6, 1988 l
l l
Document Control Desk j
j U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j
Washington, D. C. 20555 j
j
Subject:
Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 7
Technical Specification Amendment Nuclear Service Water System Actuation Logic i
i
Dear Sir:
j This letter is in response to the August 12, 1988 letter from Mr. D. B. Matthews, NRC/NRR, which denied a Technical Specification amendment request submitted on
[
d j
August 9, 1988. Attached is a revision to the previous proposed amendment to the Technical Specifications for Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-35 and NPF-52 f
1 for Catawba Units 1 and 2.
The request involves changing Technical Specification Table 3.3-3 to reflect a proposed change in the actuation logic for the Nuclear i
Service Water System. This modification is now currently scheduled to be 1
implemented in January, 1989.
I i
i It is also requested that the Technical Specification amendment allow a 48 hour5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> waiver of compliance (per pit) with the Nuclear Service Water Action Statement j
requirements to allow for the implementation of this modification.
Per the
{
4 August 12, 1988 denial letter, the discussion now addresses the safety significance of allowing a 48 hour5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> waiver of compliance with the Action j
St.etement.
i t
t j
The attachment contains the proposed change and a discussion of the justification l
and a No Significant liazards Analysis. The analysis is included pursuant to 10 l
1 CFR 50.91 and it has been concluded that the propnsed amendment does not involve j
significant hazards considerations.
4 This proposal involves a previously submitted amendment request to Catawba's i
Technical Specifications. Tharefore, no additional license fees are required.
l
+
l
)
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91 (b) (1) the appropriate South Carolina State Official is f
being provided a copy of this amendment request.
l f
1
{
Very truly yours l
I 4
j llal B. Tucker t
1 pt l
Ew0/35/les go17g 5i A
3 8 l Attachnents p
1 i
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
October 6, 1988 l
Page Two
(
xc:
Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator U. S. Nucicar Regulatory Commission l
Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. Heyward Shealy, Chief Bureau of Radiological Health l
South Carolina Department of Health &
l Environmental Control l
2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 American Nuclear Insurers c/o Dottie Sherman, ANI Library The Exchange, Suite 245 270 Farmington Avenue Farmington, CT 06032 M&M Nuclear Consultants 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020 INPO Records Center Suite 1500 1100 Circic 75 Parkway Atlanca, Georgia 30339 1
Mr. W. T. Orders
(
NBC Resident Inspector j
Catawba Nuclear Station
)
I
l 4
4 l
Proposed Technical Specification Changes a
i!
3 J
l 1
4 l
1 i
)
1 1
l I
I j
t I
l
)
4 1
a t
r I
1 I
i
)
]
1 J
4 4
)
I j
1 I
1 1
s i
.t 1
,1 t
<