|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20217G0191999-10-15015 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Followed Analytical Methods Provided in GL 90-05.Grants Relief Until Next Refueling Outage,Scheduled to Start on 991001.Temporary non-Code Repair Must Then Be Replaced with Code Repair ML20212L0881999-10-0404 October 1999 SER Accepting Licensee Requests for Relief 98-012 to 98-018 Related to Implementation of Subsections IWE & Iwl of ASME Section XI for Containment Insp for Crystal River Unit 3 ML20212J8631999-10-0101 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Proposed Alternatives to Provide Reasonable Assurance of Structural Integrity of Subject Welds & Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Relief Granted Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i) ML20212E6911999-09-21021 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed EALs Changes for Plant Unit 3.Changes Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.47(b)(4) & App E to 10CFR50 ML20210P1111999-08-0505 August 1999 SER Accepting Evaluation of Third 10-year Interval Inservice Insp Program Requests for Relief for Plant,Unit 3 ML20203A4381999-02-0303 February 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting EAL Changes for License DPR-72, Per 10CFR50.47(b)(4) & App E to 10CFR50 ML20236Q4611998-06-30030 June 1998 SER for Crystal River Power Station,Unit 3,individual Plant Exam (Ipe).Concludes That Plant IPE Complete Re Info Requested by GL 88-20 & IPE Results Reasonable Given Plant Design,Operation & History ML20216G8091998-04-10010 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Resolution of Crystal River Restart Issues Related to USI A-46 Program ML20199A1441998-01-0909 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Relief Request for Delayed Implementation of 10CFR50.55a,until 971231 or Plant Restart, Whichever Occurs First ML20199D0561997-11-14014 November 1997 Safety Evaluation Approving Ampacity Derating Test Results for Crystal River,Unit 3 Related to GL 92-08, Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers ML20212C3751997-10-16016 October 1997 SER Accepting Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20217D7561997-10-0101 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Testing of Ingersoll-Dresser Pump Model 8HN194 at Test Facility Demonstrates That Crystal River Decay Heat Pumps of Same Model Can Operate at Flows of 100 Gpm for 30 Days ML20138J0151997-05-0505 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Approving Request for Relief 95-050,Rev 1, for Plant,Unit 3 ML20138E4411997-04-30030 April 1997 Safety Evaluation on ASME Code Case N-509 for Crystal River Nuclear Plant,Unit 3 ML20140F3771997-04-28028 April 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Staff Evaluation of Plant, Unit 3 Nuclear Generating Plant IPE ML20134B7091997-01-29029 January 1997 SER Accepting Fire Barrier Sys Relied by Licensee to Meet NRC Fire Protection Requirements for Following Raceway Types & Sizes ML20133N6511997-01-22022 January 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Request to Use Code Case N-524 as Alternative to ASME Code Section XI for Plant ML20149M6801997-01-17017 January 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee 960807 Results of Analyses Re Operability Evaluation of Main Steam Sys W/Bent Rod Hangers at Plant ML20133D3471997-01-0606 January 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 155 to License DPR-72 ML20058P1981993-12-16016 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Ground Response Spectra Utilized & Approaches Used in Development of Floor Response Spectra for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20138D5941993-02-0909 February 1993 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief from Repair Requirements of ASME Code Section XI in Order to Perform Temporary Noncode Repair to 18 Inch Portion of Nuclear Closed Cycle Cooling Sys ML20126F7811992-12-22022 December 1992 Safety Evaluation to Confirm Granting of Request for Relief from ASME Code Repair Requirements Nuclear Closed Cycle Cooling Sys ML20056B5341990-08-23023 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Station Blackout.Recommends That Util Reevaluate Areas of Nonconformance W/Station Blackout Guidance Identified in Evaluation.Subj to Acceptable Resolution of NRC Recommendations,Issue Remains Open ML20055E5141990-07-0202 July 1990 Safety Evaluation Re Util 831104 & 840731 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2.1 Re Equipment Classification Programs for All safety-related Components ML20245F6561989-06-22022 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 118 to License DPR-72 ML20245D3001989-06-14014 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Meets NRC Position on Item 4.5.2 of Generic Ltr 83-28,based on Finding That Facility Will Be Designed to Permit on-line Functional Testing of Reactor Trip Sys,Including Stated Testing ML20247D4951989-05-19019 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Re TMI Action Item II.K.3.31 Concerning plant-specific Calculations to Show Compliance w/10CFR50.46 ML20245A6161989-04-19019 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 890210 Final ATWS Design Description ML20155F2641988-10-0606 October 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Relief from Inservice Testing Program ML20154A7421988-04-29029 April 1988 Evaluation of Auxiliary Feedwater Sys Reliability (Generic Issue 124).Licensee Should Consider Listed Addl Recommendations for Improved Plant Performance & Auxiliary Feedwater Sys Challenge Rate Reduction ML20234D5221987-06-16016 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Conformance to Reg Guide 1.97 ML20214Q7731987-05-29029 May 1987 Ser:Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program,Crystal River Nuclear Power Station,Unit 3,for Remainder of First 10-Yr Interval ML20214M1781987-05-26026 May 1987 Safety Evaluation Granting Util 860324 & 870114 Requests for Relief from Certain Requirements of ASME Code Section XI & to Use ANSI N45.2.6-1978 in Lieu of ASME Code Requirement of ANSI N45.2.6-1973 ML20211N2661987-02-19019 February 1987 Evaluation of Licensee Response to Insp Rept 50-302/86-12. Procedure AI-401 Found to Be Inadequate & Resulted in Restatement of Violation 2.Design Error Could Cause Loss of RHR Ability ML20211Q2971987-02-18018 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Auxiliary Feedwater Sys Reliability (Generic Issue 124) for Prairie Island Units 1 & 2 ML20211B5521987-02-0909 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Rev 7 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) & Rev 0 to Process Control Program (Pcp).Odcm & PCP Acceptable Refs for Use W/Tech Specs for Assuring Compliance w/10CFR20 & 50,App a & I ML20209H7051987-01-16016 January 1987 Safety Evaluation of Util 831104,840116 & 0731 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.4 Re safety-related Maint & Test Procedures for Diverse Reactor Trip Feature.Responses Acceptable ML20207Q6451987-01-0909 January 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 831104,840116 & 0731 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.4 Re Maint & Test Procedures for Silicon Controlled Rectifiers ML20214N1941986-09-0404 September 1986 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee 860117 Response to 10CFR50.61 Re Projected Values of Matl Properties for Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events ML20205T5301986-06-0909 June 1986 SER Supporting Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys Reliability ML20211D6251986-06-0909 June 1986 SER Supporting Responses to Generic Ltr 81-21 Re Natural Circulation Cooldown ML20210R9531986-05-0202 May 1986 SER Supporting Util Response to IE Bulletin 80-11 Re Masonry Wall design.Safety-related Masonry Walls Will Withstand Specified Design Load Conditions W/O Impairment of Wall Integrity.Technical Evaluation Rept Encl ML20133Q1271985-10-24024 October 1985 SER Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.1 Post-Trip Review Program Description & Procedure. Util 831104 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28 Does Not Meet Guidelines for post-trip Review. Acceptable Responses Required ML20135F8871985-09-11011 September 1985 SER Re Control Complex Dedicated Cooling Sys for post-fire Alternate Shutdown Capability.Design of Control Complex Dedicated Cooling Sys Meets Requirements of Section III.G.3 & Iii.L of 10CFR50 App R & Acceptable ML20135G1051985-09-0909 September 1985 SER Supporting Licensee Response to Items 3.1.1,3.1.2,3.2.1, 3.2.2,4.1 & 4.5.1 of Generic Ltr 83-28, Required Actions Based on Generic Implications of Salem ATWS Events ML20135E6131985-09-0606 September 1985 SER Re Licensee Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2 Re post-trip Review (Data & Info Capability).Licensee Program for Data Retention Conforms to Guidelines of Section Ii.D & Acceptable ML20214J2911979-12-20020 December 1979 Safety Evaluation Re Preliminary Design for safety-grade Anticipatory Reactor Trips on Loss of Main Feedwater &/Or Turbine Trip 1999-09-21
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217G0191999-10-15015 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Followed Analytical Methods Provided in GL 90-05.Grants Relief Until Next Refueling Outage,Scheduled to Start on 991001.Temporary non-Code Repair Must Then Be Replaced with Code Repair 3F1099-19, Part 21 Rept Re Damage on safety-grade Cable Provided to FPC by Bicc Brand-Rex Co.Damage Was Created During Cabling Process While Combining Three Conducters.Corrective Action Program Precursor Card PC99-2868 Was Initiated1999-10-13013 October 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Damage on safety-grade Cable Provided to FPC by Bicc Brand-Rex Co.Damage Was Created During Cabling Process While Combining Three Conducters.Corrective Action Program Precursor Card PC99-2868 Was Initiated ML20217B0931999-10-0606 October 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Damaged Safety Grade Electrical Cabling Found in Supply on 990831.Damage Created During Cabling Process While Combining Three Conductors Just Prior to Closing.Vendor Notified of Reporting of Issue ML20212L0881999-10-0404 October 1999 SER Accepting Licensee Requests for Relief 98-012 to 98-018 Related to Implementation of Subsections IWE & Iwl of ASME Section XI for Containment Insp for Crystal River Unit 3 ML20212J8631999-10-0101 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Proposed Alternatives to Provide Reasonable Assurance of Structural Integrity of Subject Welds & Provide Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Relief Granted Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i) ML20212E9031999-09-30030 September 1999 FPC Crystal River Unit 3 Plant Reference Simulator Four Year Simulator Certification Rept Sept 1995-Sept 1999 3F1099-02, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With1999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With ML20212E6911999-09-21021 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed EALs Changes for Plant Unit 3.Changes Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.47(b)(4) & App E to 10CFR50 ML20211L1321999-08-31031 August 1999 EAL Basis Document 3F0999-02, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With1999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With ML20212C1501999-08-31031 August 1999 Non-proprietary Version of Rev 0 to Crystal River Unit 3 Enhanced Spent Fuel Storage Engineering Input to LAR Number 239 ML20211B7291999-08-16016 August 1999 Rev 2 to Cycle 11 Colr ML20210P1111999-08-0505 August 1999 SER Accepting Evaluation of Third 10-year Interval Inservice Insp Program Requests for Relief for Plant,Unit 3 ML20210U5341999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3 ML20209F5601999-07-31031 July 1999 EAL Basis Document, for Jul 1999 3F0799-01, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With1999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With ML20210U5411999-06-30030 June 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3 3F0699-07, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With1999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With ML20210U5601999-05-31031 May 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3 ML20195C6271999-05-28028 May 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 0 to Addendum to Topical Rept BAW-2346P, CR-3 Plant Specific MSLB Leak Rates ML20196L2031999-05-19019 May 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 0 to BAW-2346NP, Alternate Repair Criteria for Tube End Cracking in Tube-to-Tubesheet Roll Joint of Once-Through Sgs 3F0599-04, Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Crystal River Unit 3.With1999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Crystal River Unit 3.With ML20210U5631999-04-30030 April 1999 Revised Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Crystal River,Unit 3 3F0499-04, Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Crystal River Unit 3.With1999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Crystal River Unit 3.With ML20204D9661999-03-31031 March 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 1,Addendum a to BAW-2342, OTSG Repair Roll Qualification Rept 3F0399-04, Special Rept 99-01:on 990310,discovered Containment Tendons That Required Grease Addition in Excess of Prescribed Limits During Recent Insp Activites.Six Tendons Were Refilled with Appropriate Amount of Grease1999-03-10010 March 1999 Special Rept 99-01:on 990310,discovered Containment Tendons That Required Grease Addition in Excess of Prescribed Limits During Recent Insp Activites.Six Tendons Were Refilled with Appropriate Amount of Grease 3F0399-03, Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Crystal River Unit 3.With1999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Crystal River Unit 3.With ML20203A4381999-02-0303 February 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting EAL Changes for License DPR-72, Per 10CFR50.47(b)(4) & App E to 10CFR50 ML20206E9891998-12-31031 December 1998 Kissimmee Utility Authority 1998 Annual Rept ML20206E9021998-12-31031 December 1998 Florida Progress Corp 1998 Annual Rept ML20206E9701998-12-31031 December 1998 Ouc 1998 Annual Rept. with Financial Statements from Seminole Electric Cooperative,Inc 3F0199-05, Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3.With1998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3.With ML20206E9261998-12-31031 December 1998 Gainesville Regional Utilities 1998 Annual Rept 3F1298-13, Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With1998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With 3F1198-05, Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With1998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Crystal River,Unit 3.With ML20155F4071998-10-31031 October 1998 Rev 2 to Pressure/Temp Limits Rept ML20155J2701998-10-28028 October 1998 Second Ten-Year Insp Interval Closeout Summary Rept 3F1098-06, Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3.With1998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3.With ML20206E9461998-09-30030 September 1998 Utilities Commission City of New Smyrna Beach,Fl Comprehensive Annual Financial Rept Sept 30,1998 & 1997 ML20206E9561998-09-30030 September 1998 City of Ocala Comprehensive Annual Financial Rept for Yr Ended 980930 ML20206E9101998-09-30030 September 1998 City of Bushnell Fl Comprehensive Annual Financial Rept for Fiscal Yr Ended 980930 ML20206E9811998-09-30030 September 1998 City of Tallahassee,Fl Comprehensive Annual Financial Rept for Yr Ended 980930 ML20195E3121998-09-30030 September 1998 Comprehensive Annual Financial Rept for City of Leesburg,Fl Fiscal Yr Ended 980930 3F0998-07, Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3.With1998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3.With ML20236W6501998-07-31031 July 1998 Emergency Action Level Basis Document 3F0898-02, Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1998 for Crystal River,Unit 11998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jul 1998 for Crystal River,Unit 1 ML20236V8801998-07-30030 July 1998 Control Room Habitability Rept 3F0798-01, Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Crystal River Unit 31998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3 ML20236Q4611998-06-30030 June 1998 SER for Crystal River Power Station,Unit 3,individual Plant Exam (Ipe).Concludes That Plant IPE Complete Re Info Requested by GL 88-20 & IPE Results Reasonable Given Plant Design,Operation & History 3F0698-02, Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Crystal River Unit 31998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Crystal River Unit 3 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
.
o .
\
SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM RELIABILITY -
ITEMS 4.2.1 AND 4.2.2 0F GENERIC LETTER 83-28
- 1. INTRODUCTION On July 8,1983, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued Generic Letter (GL) 83-28. This letter addressed intermediate-term actions
- to be taken by licensees and applicants aimed at assuring that a comprehensive program of preventive maintenance and surveillance testing is implemented for the reactor trip breakers (RTBs) in pressurized water reactors. In particular, Item 4.2 of the letter required the licensees and applicants to submit a'descr.iption of their preventive maintenance and surveillance program to ensure reliable reactor trip breaker operation.
The description of the submitted program was to include the following:
GL, Item 4.2.1 A planned program of periodic maintenance, including lubrication, housekeeping, and other items recommended by the equipment supplier.
GL, Item 4.2.2 Trending of parameters affecting operation and measured during testing to forecast degradation of operation.
Florida Power Corporation, the licensee for Crystal River 3, submitted responses to the Generic Letter on November 11, 1983, September 25, 1985, and October 11, 1985. This report presents an evaluation of the adequacy of those responses and of .he licensee's preventive maintenance and l
surveillance programs for RTBs.
gDR606130344 860606 p ADOCK 05000302 )
PDR I
l . _ .
^
- 2. EVALUATION CRITERIA 2.1 Periodic Maintenance Program The primary criteria for an acceptable periodic maintenance program are contained in Maintenance Instruction GEI-50299EI*, Power Circuit Breakers, Tyoes AK-2/2A 15, AK-2/3/2A/3A-25, AKU-2/3/2A/3A-25," and Service Advice 175-9.35 and 175-9.20, by General Electric. The NRC Staff, Eauipment Qualification Branch, has reviewed these items and endorsed the maintenance program they describe. The criteria include those items in the General Electric instructions and advisories that relate to the safety e
function of the breaker, supplemented by those measurements which must be taken to accumulate data for trending. Those items identified for maintenance at six month intervals that should be included in the licensee's RTB maintenance program are:
- 1. Verification of breaker cleanliness and insulation structure; all foreign materials, such as paint, dust, or oil, should be removed to prevent electrical breakdown between points of different potential;
- 2. Verification of breaker physical condition, including wiring insulation and termin'ation, all retaining rings, Dole bases, arc quencher, stationary and movable contacts, and tightness of nuts and bolts;
- 3. Verification of proper manual operation of the breaker, including checks for excessive friction, trip bar freedom, latch engagement, operatina mechanism alignment and freedom, and undervoltage trip (UVT) device armature freedom; 4 Verification of the optimum freedom of the armature;
- 5. Verification of proper trip latch engagement as sDeCified in Service Advice 175-9.35, Item #S2.
l 2
. o O
- 6. Verification of undervoltage pick-up setting, as specified in Service Advice 175-9.35, Item #53, and drocout voltage;
- 7. Verification that the trip torque required on the, trip shaft is less than 1.5 pound-inches, as specified in Service Advice 175-9.3S, Item #54; "Before" and "After" maintenance torque values should be recorded;
- 8. Verification of positive tripping by checking the adjustment between the UVT device and trip paddle as specified in Service Advice 175-9.35, Item #55;
- 9. Verification of proper trip response time as specified in Service
~
Advice 175-9.35, Item #S6;
- 10. Shunt Trip Attachment (STA) operation verification;
- 11. Examination and cleaning of breaker enclosure;
- 12. Functional test of the breaker prior to returning it to service.
2.2 Trending of Parameters Generic Letter Item 4.2.2 specifies that the licensee's preventative maintenance and surveillance program is to include trending of parameters affecting operation and measured during testing to forecast degradation of operation. The parameters measured during the maintenance program described above which are applicable for trending are undervoltage trip attachment dropout voltage, trip torque, and breaker response time for undervoltage trip. The staff Dosition is that the above three parameters in addition to the breaker insulation resistance are acceptable and recommended trending oarameters to forecast breaker ooeration degradation or failure. If subsequent experience indicates that any of these parameters is not useful as a tool to anticipate failures or degradation, the licensee may, with justification and NRC approval, elect to remove that
( parameter from those to be tracked.
3
I e o.
- 3. EVALUATION 3.1 Evaluation of the Licensee Position on Item 4.2.1 The licensee states that his preventative maintenance program for RTBs contains all the elements detailed in Section 2.1 of the SER. The licensee states that periodic maintenance is performed on an annual basis, with a functional test performed monthly. The staff finds that the licensee's extended maintenance interval is acceptable. This acceptance is based on GE's recommendation that maintenance on RTBs located in mild environments should be performed annually. The vendor recommendation that RTBs located in harsh environments or experiencing severe load conditions be maintained more frequently is not applicable to these RTBs because of their location in a mild environment and reduced service duty at Crystal River (less than 200 RTB cycles annually).The staff finds the licensee position on Item 4.2.1 to be acceptable, provided the licensee confirms that the UVT device roller-rivet clearance is measured with the UVT armature down in the energized positio.n, as recommended in IE Notice No. 85-58.
3.2 Evaluation of the Licensee's Position on Item 4.2.2 The licensee states that he will compile and submit to B&W trend data for RTB trip response time, trip shaft torque, and UVT device pickup and dropout voltage. The B&W Owners Grouo Reactor Trip Breaker Reliability Monitoring Program is attempting to identify the most effective parameters to forecast breaker degradation or failure. The staff finds the licensee position on Item 4.2.2 to be acceptable.
- 4. CONCLUSIONS Based on a review of the licensee responses, the sta#f finds the licensee responses on Items 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 of Generic Letter 83-28 to be acceptable, provided that the licensee confirms that the UVT device roller rivet-armature clearance is measured with the VVT armature down in the energized position, as recommended in IE Notice No. 85-58.
Principal contributor: E. Rowney Dated: June 9, 1986 4