ML20205H763

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Concurs W/Determination That CRGR Review of Proposed Amends to 10CFR40,70 & 150 Re Nuclear Matl Inventory Reporting Not Required Because Amends Not Applicable to Power Reactor Licensees
ML20205H763
Person / Time
Issue date: 01/17/1986
From: Sniezek J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20205H503 List:
References
FRN-51FR9763, RULE-PR-150, RULE-PR-40, RULE-PR-51, RULE-PR-74 AA82-2-03, AA82-2-3, NUDOCS 8601220541
Download: ML20205H763 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:A N2 - Phk 'o,, UNITED STATES A NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION .g / o p$ E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 , [J

  • h p'

[, ***** JAN 171986 MEMORANDUM FOR: John G. Davis, Director Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards FROM: James H. Sniezek Acting Deputy Executive Director Regional Operations and Generic Requirements

SUBJECT:

CRGR REVIEW OF REVISED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Your memorandum of December 30, 1985 to the CRGR Chairman forwarded proposed amendments to 10 CFR Parts 40, 70 and 150 concerning nuclear material inventory reporting and conveyed your view that CRGR review of the proposed amendments is not required because the amendments do not apply to power reactor licensees. It is clear to me that the rulemaking is not intended to apply to reactors. However, the underlined words in the proposed revision to Section 74.15: ...or adjusts its inventory..." could be misconstrued to mean that the results of reactor fuel burnup calculations to quantify the inventory of SNM fission products in burned fuel must be reported more often then twice a year (currentrequirements). In this regard, your staff (Mr. Renschler) indicated that Section 74.15 would be made clear regarding the staff's intent, which is that the proposed change to Section 74.15 does not apply to reactor fuel burnup calculation results. Based on this understanding, I agree with your deter-mination that CRGR review of the proposal is not required. G LWMy a es H. Sniezek A ting Deputy Executive Director gional Operations and Generic Requirements cc: CRGR /~~ I j 4 i

097.$ C ', V. L%:Lk.u~~ L \\ / UNITED STATES sN 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L,jwk, 80% i g U t E WASHINGTON. D. C 20555 k* l Q,L.oos JAN 101996 '4 le MEMORANDUM FOR: John G. Davis, Director ) Office of Inspection and Enforcement FROM: Victor Stello, Jr. Acting Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

CONTROL OF NRC RULEMAKING By memorandum of February 13,1984, " Control of NRC Rulemaking by Offices Reporting to the EDO," Offices were directed that effective April 1,1984, (1) all offices under EDO purview must obtain ED0 approval to begin and/or continue a specific rulemaking, (2) resources were not to be expended on rule-makings that have not been approved, and (3) RES would independently review rulemaking proposals forwarded for EDO approval and make recommendations to the ED0 concerning whether or not and how to proceed with the rulemakings. In accordance with this directive, the following proposal concerning rulemaking has been forwarded for my approval. Proposal to continue rulemaking to amend 10 CFR Parts 40, 70, 150 (Material Balance Reports) to eliminate unnecessary reporting requirements for most licensees not reporting under the USA /IAEA Safeguards Agreement. (Sponsored by NMSS - memorandum, Minogue to EDO dated December 27,1985.) I approve continuation of this rulemaking. The NRC Regulatory Agenda (NUREG-0936) should be modified to reflect the status of this rulemaking. ./ -{.,/::p ' .. f -> s* Victor-Stdllo,' N. J Acting Executive Qiiector for Operations cc: J. H. Sniezek J. Roe H. R. Denton J. M. Taylor R. B. Minogue P. G. Norry M pBk y I _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _}}