ML20205C135
| ML20205C135 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1986 |
| From: | Heishman R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Fiedler P GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20205C140 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608120260 | |
| Download: ML20205C135 (6) | |
See also: IR 05000219/1986008
Text
-_
_
_
_
-_
.
/
o
UNITED STATES
.
-
d
n-
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
B
,E
~
WASHWGTON, D. C. 20555
,
\\...../
August 8, 1986
-
Docket No.:
50-219
.
License No.: DPR-16
GPU Nuclear Corporation
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
ATTN: Mr. P. B. Fiedler
-
Vice President and Director
Post Office Box 388
,
Forked River, New Jersey 08731
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION NO. 05000219/86-08
Enclosed is the report of the team inspection conducted by Mr. A. R. Johnson
and other NRC representatives on March 24 to 27, 1986, at the Oyster Creek
Nuclear Generating Station of activities authorized by NRC License No. DPR-16.
The team's findings were. discussed with members of your staff at the conclusion
of the inspection. The inspection reviewed your implementation of a program
as required for establishing and maintaining the qualification of electric equip-
ment within the scope of 10 CFR 50.49. The inspection also included evaluations
of the implementation of equipment qualification corrective action commitments
made as a result of (1) identified deficiencie's in the November 30, 1982, Safety
Evaluation Report (SER), and July 9, 1982 Franklin Research Center, Technical
Evaluation Report (FRC TER); (2) proposed method of resolution for the EQ
deficiencies documented in responses from you (December 21, 1984, February 22,
and March 15, 1985); and (3) the SERs for Final Resolution of EQ, May 28, 1985.
Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selected procedures and records,
interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
The inspection determined that you have implemented a program to meet the re-
quirements of 10 CFR 50.49.
Five deficiencies in your program implementation
are summarized in Appendix A and are classified as Potential Enforcement /Unre-
solved Items. These will be referred to the NRC Region I office for further
action. All five of the Potential Enforcement / Unresolved Items represent
failures to fully document the qualification of the following types of equip-
ment: Li'mitorque motor operators types SBD-0, SMB-00, SMB-000, and SMB-1,
Namco limit switches types D1200G and EA740, Rockbestos Firewall III and SIS
cable, PVC splice tape, and GE type EB terminal blocks. The additional concerns
are classified as Open Items and a future NRC inspection will review your actions
concerning them. Details of the deficiencies and concerns are discussed in
the enclosed inspection report.
860812026o 860 sos
DR
ADOCK 05000319
G
CG
'
$
1
,
~
- - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
.
'
.
'
-
,
.
GPU Nuclear Corporation
-2-
-
August 8, 1986
We consider the noted deficiencies potentially significant. Your corrective
actions regarding the identified deficiencies and concerns should not be
delayed pending either a future NRC inspection or further action by the NRC
Region I Office, especially considering your planned October 1986 plant re-
-- .
start.
We are available to discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
.
o
.
_._g j.
Robert F. Heishman, Chief
Vendor Program Branch
Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor
and Technical Training Center Programs
Office of Inspection and Enforcement
Enclosure:
Inspection Report No. 05000219/86-08
.
.
M.
--
.
t
,
,
'
August 8, 1986
,
DISTRIBUTION:
- DC5 u
4P M IC3
'
VPB Reading
DQAVT Reading
JTaylor
BGrimes
UPotapovs
AJohnson
SAlexander
RWilson
GHubbard
RLaGrange,BWEB/NRR
NLe, NRR
RBorgen, INEL
DBeahm, INEL
MJacobus, SNL
,
JChavez, SNL
LCheung, RI
MDev, RI
JDurr, RI
WBateman, SRI, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
(Route 9) P.O. Box 388
Forked River, NJ 08731
- See previous page for oncurrences.
VPB:DQAVT
SC/VP : QAVT
BC/VPB:DQAVT
RI
AJohnson:tt*
UPotapovs
Hei man
C, hJDOdiod
7/2E3/B(>
07/09/86
(/f/86
/ /86
oe ywej'
C*i
9
r 1
i
9I.
-
'
s
-
August 8, 1986
'
-
DISTRIBUTION:
,
'
VPB Reading
'
DQAVT Reading
JTaylor
BGrimes
.
,
UPotapovs
AJohnson
SAlexander
RWilson
GHubbard
RLaGrange,BWEB/NRR
,
NLe, NRR
RBorgen, INEL
-
DBeahm, INEL
MJacobus, SNL
JChavez, SNL
LCheung, RI
MDev, RI
JDurr, RI
WBateman, SRI, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
(Route 9) P.O. Box 388
Forked River, NJ 08731
-
1
.
- See previous page for oncurrences.
VPB:DQAVT
SC/VP : QAVT
BC/VPB:00AVT
RI
C,A40CLbd
AJohnson:tt*
UPotapovs
Hei man
07/09/86
(/f/86
/ /86
7[26[B6 j '
v
y9 f te
.
.
'
~
,
, - - _ _ _
_
,
_
, _ _
_. __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
I... .
-
_
,,
.
.
.
.
.
Appendix A
.
.
Potential Enforcement / Unresolved Items
March 24 to
As a result of the special equipment qualification inspection on
I as P6tential
the following items have been referred to NRC Regioniled portions of
Enforcement / Unresolved Items (paragraph refereries are to deta
27, 1986,
the inspection report).
five Limitorque
Contrary to paragraph (f) of 10 CFR 50.49, the EQ files forll, did no
motor operators, model SBD-0, located in the drywe
similarity between
1.
establish qualification because of failure to demonstrate
The files did not
the tested and installed motor operator configuration.
d during the type
establish whether the grease relief valves that were used failed to adequa
test were actually installed in these operators, an
(Paragraph
demonstrate that the installation of "T"
drains was unnecessary
4.F(1), Item 50-219/86-08-01).
5.1 and
Contrary to paragraphs (f) and (k) of 10 CFR 5
perators,-
t blish qualifica-
2.
models SMB-1, SMB-00, and SMB-000, did not adequately es a
the tested and
'
tion because of failure to demonstrate similarity betweenThe similarity a
h internal wiring
installed motor operator configuration.
quate in that it did not establish qualification for t e(Paragra
of valve operators.
i
5.1, 5.2.2,
Contrary to paragraphs (f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49, and sect ons
and 5.2.6 of the 00R Guidlines, the EQ files for Namco
f failure to
3.
D1200G, did not adequately establish qualificatio
l tive humidity,
and steam accident conditions on a type test.
219/86-08-03).
limit
Contrary to paragraph (f) of 10 CFR 50.49, the EQ files for Na
lification because
switches, model EA740, did not adequately estab
t d and installed
4.
lled equipment con-
material of construction; and (2) the tested and insta
No supporting analysis was con-to the
figuration with respect to moisture seals.tained in
xposed to the
equipment operability if the limit switch internals
bill of material.
)
5.2.5 of the
Contrary to paragraphs (f) and (k) of 10 CFR 50.49 and sectio
00R Guidelines, the EQ files for Rockbestos
d
tely demonstrate
5.
i
nt functional per-
qualification because of failure to show that the equ pme
.
4
e.-
b
.
.- . ---..-- .---- __- -
. , -
.
- - - , , ,
-
. . , ,
- , , . .
.
'
.
.
.
.
.
.
'
2
.
.
formance requirements were satisfied. Files for the Rockbestos cable and
PVC splice tape did not contain any analysis of the functional performance
~
requirements and the functional performance criteria and requirements for
GE EB terminal blocks were incorrectly addressed (Paragraph:4.f(5), Item
50-219/86-08-05).
.
A
!
e
a
M.
g
=
k
.
. . - . . - - . _ . - _ - , . . _ . . . . ,
- - - ,
- - - .
.. - - . . - .
__.
. . - . . .
_
. ,. --.- , - -