ML20203E402

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to SO23-XXVI-20.46, Visual Exam Procedure to Determine Condition of Nuclear Parts,Components or Surfaces. W/Temporary Change Notice 0-1
ML20203E402
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/1996
From: Mahindraker A
LAMBERT, MACGILL & THOMAS, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML19317C790 List:
References
SO23-XXVI-20.49, NUDOCS 9712170053
Download: ML20203E402 (25)
v • d • e


Text

. . .- .

CEFERrNCE; sot 23.VF1.0.1

  • NWG  % i e1 (PERMANENT WHEN FINAL APPROVED)

NOTES: 1) If the Doctavient is QA Pr am Affects a Technical Specincation Wtation will occur if C7 DM nnat approval Te not otitanned within 14 s from TC issuance.

2) tf only Eddorial Corrections are required, tit.g form PF(123) 111 should be used (refer to SO123-VI.1.0.1).

nce O ME Seigte Use TCN Cance' /M TCNNo Copy forwarded to the Nucsear SaTeiy' Group.

Part 8

- PERFORMED SY: __ . T MA[A Date 311N _7 / MQC

1. Document No 402 *% - O M l1 - NO
  • M Revision No. . (5 5.ngie Use TCN: Yes O No Documert Tee _ _h ti rd h n tyn nes h t,vs Dinferluse 4 ri r& biv w.'i e e % (e rrir M \ r, 9 O bebv on kt. G e rse M c M n w hi b r e. c.

Documert Autturronge,ata ' M tua Mohr4.mk te v . SG1[O (, -79 C 6 7~5 Newt ce rves uv6 PAA DA E owGawon

2. TCN Deviation Approval (Req'd for TCN numbers over $); APPROVED BY: M/A cmon en,saw) sece. Arm av in.scoet em,c nave Ano so st A ra cA rtim 3 Chedt appropriate bor Entre Document Attached O Affected Page(s) Attached Superseded /Inwrporated CN(sFEC(s) A/ CAM ertgggabe fbrSepe use TCNs)

NUwnft(if Ncf.lk M biAIE) ""

4 This change cannot west untd the next revaion of the Document and is required.

e O To ampierrent facaty design change (oce, uur, TN, etc.)

Facilrty design charge identifier AIN.271996 /

Pce.Ata oce, wwp, **c, im a rc cgurgR i

m.m.e.n.

e. tam of ic- - tne feeinty n

.n w 2e h.a,,s,, been de.t.e.rm.,a .ed,.

e. char - -,

SHE flLE COPY y , a u, a b ]R Omer te g. Ca. uRc co,vmen-w specme R.none a h o ew <;o N (n S M T- I wnM bd L n .wh n m - als m e n. ct M o nt. '

Desenstmocf Change (s) Use deverse See #Readh Cntn f e d k I n y m ed

[MT 'tni v e tw & Oc , vnd b 4 Cf.6 i

st N w 7

A MT h et e nn rte t e t e. u a nUA,wel s Coud en.o .Tc imp 4em v.non.,.of na ena..nge e a- P po.e a$me a. . enwonmentas . somna errects.o.r any tyr. MCElVED drectv,or CDW YO N' E inseeny?

6 Review requested from ether organcahens/deccices? re ves Pen 23 i104. ., =ai emme aa m.,ne se.o.e ) , , , , YesO No 8 Pu1 G vv610 Gyh

7. is. the d.ocument,,e - .Deing .TCMd.Q.Ae,.. P.ro.

A gram

, n.. Artecti.nge,.or Level T . c 1.Q am A P.rogram Affec, ting? Yes G No C avn e e m . e.a c e = Poia s m m., e = P io cs.,

  • n e nio .,e.e.w,.at(eim e.mm.senmems 1- b
a. Is the document to to changed an Eme;ency Operat:ng instruction?

b is tne tntent of the ong nel doctavient altered?

YesO Noh Yes O No %

(!f the answer to a or b is Yes, then a TCN is not authorized. A revision is required; see SO1:3 V1-0.9 and SO123.V1-1.)

10 CFR IMS Consideratiom c.

Fas the proposed c9arage alreacy been evaluated for 50.59 consideration or a 7 queston Safety Evaluaton prepared using an approveo process?

it e v.a w a-. oceAemw.co.aevor s,.c= a c.ae. swa

,,=

ri eaamt .o Yee O Enter idertier and assm:sted no. No Attach PF(123) 1091 or $c 59 Safety Evaluatton (7 quesbons)

NOTE. Mts P. P.poud eep sm 4. we.w.i er e. So Se er.um.at .= dr e n. rant Refef to L012341.3.)

eeCt".Af1 OCP. MA TFM NCflL TEC>t SPEC, PRCxYDyR$ AND NO Part D - NTIAL APPRO e(A>REVft WLD and APPROviiD BY; *

s. N h 2, $,1 i SA< VllV IUDO PLAdr up.A4&udNT STheff t CATE Twt PJeff MANA". $7M p hr*3;&' i CATE IMj c ued meticN et.c da.s 4 se re a p wp.a.a Yes"O NoO Cwe tu. M8daeus* e.cp 2.

es "O Noh 3

ch.-4e.W 4. // 9 f ! f, >g/Ef Twei $4-er'S M3, , g [ b'. Ch7E imE

$ b 6, '

C44 AT NNGIluPMVWUN MANMR/y , Q ,h g ) DAlb Ch AUTr A$sM4Nca=@4Is 1,2 ANO 3 OATE

  • et i cA P rw wanae = Nei oA Pws/n Ae.cias. ewa 3RocFM maes pur a s awe.s a ecM oA ap.,o i awy e. requ d f.,tesW a .4 nem e. coswas 1 CM Pegr. 48P.cna so.~.m e e sa.a.4 tasan ,a P.et u.a.,.-n sum.fg .a4.ra,5A

e oa Psee.'em a..cwg m.a wm, e sun .= maa.e n e. .

s

6. .y.n. m. mew .# e. Pi ,e u.a.e m.at sn.e, .ad .a.e TCNssRocFM L.ewd .a ew .nie .r one. 9.ced 0,w TCH p owW e v.s e v , e e.g. e e eat. = u en.ge md . =,*as by un creme .w. , mi .aa.iv . en wede == pd ,.im .omun tv ew veas. )
o. s,* so mae.airsut ss = , sn.a.mae. e. ,.e snocen ame w.

Part F = ppoonal)

The entre doeurnent was reviewed in Con Unction wtn tnis TCN and found to De acce his cQrtst%tes an armua6t>ennral rowew disposJten of Accelptable As Wr:tten-Extersd (SO123-Vl 1.02),pta$se as wr:t!

REVIEWED and APPROVED BY: .

cweert NacicnA. civision uAnAcu ca ces.c,.ng a CAft Part G -!or hPG Vse Only:

is QNQC Review / Approval Reqdred? Nott un m. .em.uen ern.m a cAcc n.m um n.,ma n re tw.a.6 c3 = n,cre

  • $ ha et., D.A et me Qv tg Asweec. Rew.weA,emw.i nae e port E. Yes % No* O Has a $050 Safety Evaluanon (7 cuest:ons) been etta nue. L. ao n.omum.sive n soinni s' '

' maes a .eev er , 1 wetasss.tc,E,s.a e. Yes.O No PERFORMED BY:

sta Patim t to nev e sS4 M ddWe NUC(EAR PROCEQVRC$CRQup(WQ

/ M' W #' 9 W N 18 acc CA ft 9712170053 971212 PCR ADOCK 05000361

Oferences- 50123-VI-3.3 Page _ 1 of_ 3 U_NREVIEWED SAFETY 6tjEST10N (10 CFR 50.591 SCREENING CRITERIA DOCUMENT NO.

60 M- %%N i1 -30 4 4 REV. 60. O TCN. No.

PAh! !) 10 CFR 50.59 REYJfjl(Refer to 30123-VI+1.3) ~ (if applicable) 1.

Does this new procedure / procedure change alter system / component perfonnance or tne design configuration of a system taportant to safety? 4es,_,,,,,Noj 2.

Does systenthis new procedure taportont to safety! / procedure change alter the calibration of a Yes.,,,_,, Nob 3.

Does this new procedure / procedure change alter the required actions as a result of ggt meeting the acceptance criteria or alter Techntest Speciftection numerical data of a systne taportant to safety!

Yes _ No.,,f.,

4.

Does this new procedure / procedure change reduce the level of approval required for a plant activityt Yes ,,No j t.- Does this new procedure /

processing, sonttoring, procedure change alter processes for handitag,or releasing contained in plant systems?

Te s,,,,,,,, No ,f 5.

Does this red Technical procedure / procedure change violate the provisions of the Specifications?

Tes_,,,_ No,,,2(,,,

Remarks h tmP -

(if required, use reverse stee er attach additional sheets.) .

PSEPARED BY _ Awys u nu e . era r .<

ognisant Jncivicual DATE 4- 7-%

APPROVED BY: '

CognizarfTupervisor DATEhl h L 't j,,( "Yes' is the answer to any question in Part I), th niSTOP document processing. Coordinate Part II) completion coordinate Part 11) with Cognizant completion with Supervisor, Supervisor or contact Nuclear Procedures Group (NPG) to Technical Support, or centact Superviser Technical (STA).

support cirectly; during off-hours co,ntact the on-duty $tation Technical Adviso,r PART11) 50.59 $AFETY EVAWATION DETERMINATION (Aequired when Yt3 checked in PART !)

Area / Individual Assigned:

DATE (Please Print)

Is a 50.59 Safety Evaluation required based on the new procedurechanget(Referto50123-VI-1.3.

  • Attachment 1)procedurel

' Yes*_ No**_,,,,,

If Yts cospTete so.59 safety tvalestion per established procedi.res ord attach, sTOP document ft3 answer Indicated on 5o.59 Safety Ivaluation. processing if If No, provide justification (indicate resevrees consulted. as applicable):

(if required, use reverse side er attach additional sheets.)

PREPARED BY:

Cognizant Individual /STA CATE APPROVED BYt CFDM or Designee DATE Uct

{- 1) M Yts in Part II). th,,gg notify lie 3 supervision; forward a copy of this form and associated 50.59 safety Evaluation (7 questions) to Nuclear L{ censing.

l t) U T13 answer is indicated on 50.59 3afety tvaluation (7 questions). E*,,a STCP document processta Nuclear $afety Group.MG supervision; forward a copy of this form. 50.59 Safety tvaluation. and document to n sne . . s ,,,s o

i

I l 06/18/96- 09:38 CS10 r 82266 8 L.M.T.. Inc. CA +** Palcish @,001

." 5023-XXVII-20.49, Rey, 0, hCLp 3 'f 3 TCN_ [ ,/

Lambert

  • MacGill Thomas, Inc.

Testing a Engineering . SeMee . Ticining

" Sev.5sist Regicaa' Ot' ice Main Offea S308 7 Mgus Crhe 2310: Foley St set Ra'e gh, NC 27613 Naywa':f CA 94545 (919: 702 4590 (310; 762 366C Fax:(915) 702 5732 Ps.x:($10) 782 2t65 i To1 Free (E00) 345 4339

- June 1B,1996

. 96-DBM 079

! Amn Mahindraker

' .Noclear Services Southern Californla Edison

.' 5000 Pacific Coast Highway

Sa., Clerneme, CA 92672

'!', SUBJF.CT; Resiew ofNDE Report Forms : MI, PT. Ur, VT-1, VT-3.

._t t

j Dear Mr. Mahindraker T-h response to yourrequest ofJitne 7,1996, w e have re.iewed the SONOS repcrt forms for coinpliance with ASME B&PV Code requirements. The exa~.inition repott forms comply with the nk.imutn re:;uiremer.ts of the 19S0 edition Sincerely,

$' ~

l F..L. Thomas hhf)

D.B. MacGill I

Pasident QA Oiker l'

I! CC:

I g i

'i i !.

  • . 9htcC77.It-i e

. .i

~

Lcmbart o MacGill o Thomas, Inc.

S023.XXVII-20,49 Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service
  • Training $51j' 0 yg
  • Tcd h-f /

TITLE: VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES REctmg ( ,

I. EURPOSE AND SCOPE S I$33 A. Purnose ICOP' This procedure provides the instructions for performance of VT-1 visual examinations on nuclear components.

B. Scope This procedure is applicable to determine the general conditions of parts, components and surfaces in nuclear power facilities.

II. RfEERENCES A. This procedure is in compliance with the applicable portions of the following referenced documents:

1. American Society of Hechanical Engineers Boiler

, and Pressure Vessel Code, 1989 edition.

a) Section V, " Nondestructive Testing", 1989 edition. ,

b) Section XI, " Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Power Plant Components", 1989 edition.

Prepared by: W. L. Thomas ,

Approvals:

l b$N{ y p/ri g y - -

llp?sS]p

! D.B.#MacGill Date E. L. Thomas Date l

QA Officer General Manager I

j QA PROCRAM AFFECTING

Lcmbart o MccGill o Thomas, Inc.

S023.XXVII-20.49 Testing

  • Engineering e Service
  • Training k'gY {0 ( g 72rd/7-/

TITLE: VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES II. B. The American Society of Nondestructive Testing, SNT-TC-1A, August 1984 edition.

C. Suonlemental References

1. LMT, Inc. Procedure QA-6, " Qualification and Certification of NDE Personnel."
2. LMT, Inc. Operating and Quality Assurance Manual.
3. LMT, Inc. Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.

III. DEFINTTTONS A. VT Visual examinations to determine the condition of the part, components, or surface examined, including such conditions as cracks, wear, corrosion, erosion or physical damage on the surfaces or the part or components.

1. Direct VT Visual examination conducted when access is sufficient to place the eye within 24 inches (610 mm) of the surface to be examined and at an angle not less than 30 degrees to the surface. Hirrors may be used to improve the angle *

. of vision (see Figure 1).

2. Remote VT Visual examinations that may be substituted for direct VT-1 or when access or practicality is insufficient to place the eye within 24 inches (610 mm) of the surface to be examined and at an angle not less than 30 degrees to the surface (sco Figure 1),

a) Remote examination may use aids, such as telescopes, borescopes, fiber optics cameras, or other suitable instruments, provided such

. systems have a resolution capability at least equivalent to that_ attainable by direct visual examination.-

1

t Lambert o MacGillo Thomas, Inc. '

S023 XXVII-20.49 Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service
  • Training hs 9y p TCN /)- /

TITLE:

VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES III. B. Discontinuity - an interruption in a normal physical structure which may not affect the use of a component for its intended purpose.

C. Defect - a discontinuity which affects the usefulness of a component.

IV. EESB2HEIBILITIts A. The LMT General Manager, is responsible for the generation, control, and approval of this; procedure.

1. The approval of the General Manager shall be indicated by a dated signature on Page 1 of this procedure.

B. The LMT Technical Secretary, is responsible for

  • ccheduling personnel for certification and/or recertification, in accordance with the requirenents of this procedure.

C. The LMT responsible Field Supervisor, shall qualify the procedure for a particular examination.

V. PROCEDURE OUALIFICATIQH A. The procedure shall be qualified for specific examination, personnel, and equipment by succ,essful application on a similar component part, or device.

B. This procedure need only be qualified once for each application.

'VI. PERSONNEL REOUTREMENTS A. Personnel shall be qualified and certified according to the requirements of ASME Section XI, 1989 edition and meet the guidelines of SNT-TC-1A, August 1984 edition.

-Lambert

  • MacGill
  • Thomas, Inc. -

S023 XXVII-20.49 Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service
  • Training hl[fgn0 of . 22-TCN [-/

TITLE: VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES VI. B. Level I, II, and III individuals must successfully complete the following physical requirements annually: >

1. An examination shall be conducted to assure natural or corrected near distance acuity, in at least one eye, an determined by the ability to ,

read the Jaeger No. 1 on a standard Jaeger test at not less than 12 incher or a near distance test pattern equivalent to a Snellen fraction of 20/20.

C. Personnel shall receive a color vision test to verify the distinction of cciors and the differentiating contrast between colors normally used in the applicable examination (s).

D. Only Level II or III individuals are permitted to investigate, interpret, or make final determination on the reportability of indications.

VII. EOUTPMENT AND MATERTAL REOUIREMENTS A. Commercially available equipment such as lences,'

cameras, lamps, mirrors, borescopes, fiberscopes, '

binoculars, calipers, micrometers, rulers, or special gages shall be used as necessary. Special o't remote equipment used shall be identified on the examination report.

B. Lighting, natural or artificial, shall be sufficient to resolve a 1/32 inch (0.8 MM) black line on an I 18tneutral gray card (see Figure 'c) . j VIII. PREPARATIONS A. Documentation l' . 'The following preliminary documentation I requirements shall be reviewed by the examiner 1

~

Lcmbart o MacGill

  • Thomas, Inc.

S023 XXVII 20.49 Tesiing

  • Engineedng
  • Service
  • Trdning [ of g

'icr4 /)./

TITLE:

VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE OONDITIOJ OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES VIII.A. 1. with the client before any examinations.

a) Component or device drawings; b) Inspection reports; c) Personnel Certifications; d) NRC Form 4; e) NRC Forn 5; f) Status Indicators; g) RWP (when applicable);

h) Procedure (s);

i) Special equipment needs; j) Isometric drawings; k) Weld drawings.

B. Physical

1. The following preliminary documentation requirements shall be reviewed by the examiner with the client before specific examinations are performed:

a) Insulation removal (as required);

b) OSHA requirements (ladders, lighting, fresh

_ air, scaffolding, etc.);

c) Safety precautions.

IX. LIMITATIONS None.

X. CALTBRATIQH Not applicable to thin procedure.

XI. PERFORMANCE A. Welds (Fabrication)

1. Welds should be examined as applicable for

, evidence of the following:

~

Lambert o MacGill

  • Thomas, Inc. , p-/-

m 5023.XXVII 20.49 Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service
  • Trainha - Revisi n 0 Page 4

of R TITLE: VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES XI. A. 1. a) Incomplete fusion (see Figure 3);

b) Incomplete penetration (see Figure 3);

c) Overlap (see Figures 4 and 5);

d) Excessive penetration (see Figure 4);

e) Undercut (see Figure 6);

f) Underfill (see Figure 6);

g) Craters (see Figure 7);

h) Poor Weld profiles (see Figures 7, 8, 9, and 10);

i) Cracks (see Figure 11);

j) Inclusions; '

k) Porosity;

1) Arc strikes; m) spatter; n) Pitting; o) Weld Dead Finish; p) Other discontinuities reccr -d by the Owner.

B. Welds (Service Induced)

1. Welds should be examined as applicable for
  • evidence of the following:

a) Cracks; ,

b) Corrosion; c) Wear; d) Erosion; c) Pitting; f) Distortion; g) Galling; h) Physical Damage; i) Other discontinuities required by the Owner.

4

l.

I Lambert o MacGill

  • Thomas, Inc.

l

,, 5023.XXVII 20.49 ,

Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service
  • Training Revision 0 '

Fage M of &

_ -ren 0 - /

TITLE: VISUAL EXAMINATION PRCCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES XI. C. Comoonents or Parts Other Thon Welds

1. Components and Parts should be examined as (

applicable for evidence of the following:

a) Stress risers; b) Cracks; c) Burrs or nicks; d) Galling; e) Erosion; f) Corrosion; g) Wear; h) Physical Damage; i) Unusual stains; j) Blistered or chipped paint; k) Other discontinuities required by the cwner.

XII. EVALUATlQH A. All results shall be documented on the examination report (see Figure 12). Reporting should includh, where applicable, the following items:

_ 1. The date;

2. The procedure and procedure revision number;
3. Evidence of unusual conditions previousl,y listed;
4. Weld configuration (see Figure 13);
5. Surface condition; .
6. Attachment and sketches as necessary;
7. Lighting used;
8. 10% neutral gray card results;
9. Remote or special equipment;
10. Drawing number (s).

B. The visual report shall state either "NRI" (no reportable indications) or the existence of unusual conditions previously listed.

Lcmb rt o MacGill

  • Thomas, Inc.

5023 XXVII 20.49 Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service
  • Training Revis10n 0 Page _6L_ Of < ~

i T~c M (7 - /

TITLE: VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SUk? ACES XII. C. For reportable indications, a reference system shall be a sketch of the item showing the relative location orientation.

D. Components whose visual examination detects the relevant conditions described in the standards of ASME Tables IWB-3410-1 and IWC-3410-1 shall be unacceptable for service.

1. Reportable indications may be verified by supplemental surface or volumetri examinations.

E. The final evaluation is subject to review by an LMT Level III, VT-1.

F. All reportable indications shall be reported to the client or his cognizant representative as soon as practical following the examination (s).

XIII. RECORDS -

A. An examination report is required for each examination, or defined assignment, uch as a portion of a system.

B. Photography may be 3.dded to the record at the option of

_ the examiner or the request of the client.

XIV. REVIEW A. Examination reports shall be subject to review by an assigned LMT' Level III Supervisor for conformance to the requirements of this pencedure.

XV. STORAGE AND DISTRT83UTION A. Examination. documentation shall become the property of the client upon his sign-off. Additional reports which may include examination documentation as referenced natorial shall be generated from copics.

i

~

I

I t

\

Lambert 9 MacGill

  • Thomas, Inc.

"" 5023 XXVII 20.49 Testing

  • Engineering
  • Serv!Ce = Training Revision o d hge 9 of 2 r Ten O-/

TITLE:

VISUAL EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, COMPONENTS OR SURFACES -

XV. B. Field storage facilities shall provide a safe storage area and access to files shall be limited to the LHT Fleid Supervisor and his designated representatives.

XVI. EDISION AND FIPfD CHANCE A. Revision

1. This procedure may be revised to remain current with changing requirements of the reference documents and/or job conditions.

B. Field changg

1. This procedure may be modified to allow changes for specific circumstances by issuing Field Changes according to the requirements tc IJfT Procedure QA-6, " Procedure Generation and Control."
2. Field Changes shall be prepared by the LMT Field ,

Supervisor.

3. Prior to implementation, Field Changes shall be s approved by the authorized client representative.

W

l i

PRUC. VT-1, RE71510N is. PAGE 10 o' 22, 11/08/94 . .

r"

,7 LIGHT' SOURCE m 3

\% T y PROPER #! ,

l 4.- .

VIEWING A

v ANGLE 4 V $ i s

s A

3D s =o s ' 24 INCHES Oa LESS 8g s g=

s o-N e N m od g

o Ry 30' f s '

30* o o

/ '-

1 . 5Bhn{N95 o

T

$ '> >@ r M n was ~

885 - 3 1 W10  %

-- Ut?8 wo.o 5 0

, o -

og g o .-.

m-b N

~

(Fleiern 11 h

]

Lambort o MacGill o Thrzma's,Inc. l g- Testing

  • Engineering = Service . Training l

sis Aldo Avenue  :

Santa Clara, CA 95050  !

408 980-9333 5023-XXVII-20.49 Revis1010 Page 1_ of 12..

7cN D -l e

9

-,an .s .4 " ww w ' * * ~

. rswa. g

% 3 ? 2*2m- -} *Qas g k*.,

k '

8' '

p=e N ..

t U

?.

5 G

C '

U

)

'8 E

(r hure 2)

~

Lambort o MacGill o Thomds,Inc.

g Testing Engineering Service Training 545 Aldo Avenue i Santa Cloro. CA 95050 408 980-9333 5023-XXVII20.49 Revision 0 Page ll_ of ZL INCOMPLETE FUSION .

  • O~/

r i

/

I l

ERSE METAL

= '

INCOMPLETE PENETRATION l '

. l n

". L /

g ADEQUATE PENETRATION - SINGLE WELDED JOINT i ,

l l'

E c -

, SINGLE WELDED JOINT DOUBLE WELDED JOINT

.S

! 2 l

I (Figure 3) l

PROC. YT-1, REVISION 8. PAGE 13 of 22, 11/08/94 .

OVERLAP

/

( =____ b r '

f

{jl[M / , OVERLAP

  • f $

g

~

/ OVERLAP-*' 1 w .

2 EXCESSIVE PENETRATION E

- a m

. -M '

Q s=

( o-l 5*

y Ed I) a83 o .o

\ PROPER PENETRATION O k3 8B h n n D 500 i ess> g'f)

. S as -

iW10 6ms 5:31 08E 5O BASE METAL D s

d.G_5 o

t u *-

T UEXCESSIVE PENETRATION w l ( p Ia .. <. 4) i,,_.

_.,,,,..,,.,-1

Lambort o MccGill o Thsmns.

9 , g'j Testing

  • Engineering Service.

515 Aldo 5023 XXVII.20.49 l Santa Cloro. C Revision 0 408 5 &49e & of it_

Tc 4

()-l THE ANGLE BETWEEN THE BASE METAL AND A LINE. TANGENT TO THE WELD P.ETAL AT THE T0E OF THE WELD WILL BE LESS THAN 900 IF OVERLAP IS PRESENT. ,-

1 h) f 1 90*

b/X,//'/#

M ((d M Y NN '

UNACCEPTABLE PROFILE OVERLAP PRESENT -

. I THE ANGLE BETWEEN THE BASE METAL AND A LINE TANGENT  !

. 3

, TO WELD METAL AT THE T0E OF THE WELD Will BE GREATER THAN 900 IF NO OVERLAP IS PRESENT.

I a;

N kW 99' f (f/// Y$ /// '/l *

$ ~

GOOD PROFILE NO OVERLAP -

w e .

I 1

[. THE ANGLE IS EQUAL 10 900 NO OVERLAP 15 PRESENT.

5 3

1 8 -

Ts

&T, ,

)

-E f///A@A'N%'N* & /gn,  !

ACCEPTABLE P80F1LE N0 OVERLAP l 1

(Figure 5) l l

Lambarto MacGillo Themas

' Testing = Engineering

  • Sen.' ice a 515 Alde 5023 XXVII 20.49 Santo Cloro. CRevision # 0 of .'21.

408 8. 269.,1d_

TcA Q-j UNDERCUT SPECIFIED CONTOUR ,/

/l(<_"

UNDERCUT 6

p/ e N Nj 1

\

UNDERCUT SPECIFIED

\,- ~/ CONTOUR E UNDERFILL (SUCKBACK) q ..

W UNDERFILL -

5 i -

S -

d \

t i

. I  ; -

e v

5 '

G

~,

i SUCKBACK 1

(Figure 6) l

~

LambortTM acGilloThomas Testing Engineoring

  • Service
  • b' 515 Alde 5023-XXVII-20.49 R

Santa Cloro. C evisio(n 0408.< Page .1 g CRATERS ,

rcs 0-f CRATER

=

- l

. 1

(- l> :

, (,1

/

CRATER .

i WELD PROFILE N l 1;

O 3 UNACCEPTABLE FILLET WELD PROFILES

% $N -

. fi- '

\ f, ,

s  ; -

Ns  ; 's,  ! 's i N s

,  ; 's, y Je-- 's N i s

=

i i ,

(i i i

's

i. ,

li i

5 i G G

W

. UNACCEPTABLE BUTT WELD PROFILES 2

~ m'p  : . K.

b i m'>~< i  :

V7 >-:

si g

\

'Y

& { ~b .!

i i

l

(

Lamborto MacGillo Thomas

' m N

Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service 515 Aldc S023 XXVII 20.49 -

Revisioti 0 Santa Claro, 408. ( Page .L'l-. of K rca 0-1 ROOT CONCAVITY .

ROOT CONVEXITY EXCESSIVE REINFORCEMENT -

PROPER WELD PROFILE r N 9

8 EXCESSIVE CONVEXITY / REINFORCEMENT, t .

=,

u -

a . .

E g .

B

, \/

Y (Figure 8)

___________________m. _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

Lombarto MacGillo Thomas Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service e 4 515 Alde 5023.XXVII 20.49 RWisi g 0 Sonto Cloro.

4088 C {8.Tr? l.R. - Of 22' 7cd 9'/

ACCEPTABLE FILLET WELD CONVEXITY '

, , . or rm u, . .r, 03rYt 3lTY - M X

(u==

Yh ==r=  ;

f,b

^

[. ... L c=Gii g u.. .

s 8

E Th / r  ; 1

, s

[f YJb b- Y' Y.J 'I.': Y_J.__'2 a

c -

- n.-- l-s.. ; e _,. ,,_,_ he _ n,_,,,

he w -

w c~w c u n w ai w e i.,

E l0".07.RZ t-~ * . ..

h) A 8M M e -

e b

a N

J S

E (Figure 9)

___..__...__-.________.___._.___--_--_.2_____ _ - - . _ _ _ _ - - - - - - . - -

Lambcrto MasGilloTh mas Testing.Engineerino. Service.

@ 545 Alde 5023 XXVII 20.49 o '.

Santo clogo.,c, ,gjisip,0gw TcN 0-l EASUREMENT OF FILLET WELD THROAT EFFECTIVE FILLET WELD THROAT 15 THE SHORTEST DISTANCE FROM THE ROOT Of THE WELD TO ITS FACE.

IMacteve d M889 L Mactree evees eroet  ! erset i

q f

4 THEORETICAL THROAT OF EQUAL AD UNE00AL LEG FlLLET WELDS e

s -

8 - a. m .e. 7 .

7 w p < . w..u Q_*gy

, Afe=m' r.g. -A -

a

~  % ,- ...  !

g .

  • sv8CS 38 0 RIOM esO C L t3 T AtaseQL Testom8TICAL THRO AT '5,1 N 8828 LJ

==a A g waq es eq% esteam. K . . .

. em ee ews .w #,. un e, E / N 7a* De ,

s m = . _ . -

r 8L 0 $ G as TAA $ gooseC A84 Ot ans Cm 880 wet asTpt eLLET 6

(Figure 10) l

PA VT-1, REVISIO( 8. PAGE 20 of 22, 11/08/94 .

o LongitudinalCracks

( -

> ~, r-LONGITUDINAL CRACKS j m

- ,- B cr m

2 E

sm

  • Transverse Cracks if O oO T=

c-59

. y N aif OT

/ o

/

/ F 85 dm m &

\

\ %R e un

( - . - o m y,

/

IN WELD METAL x

IN HEAT AFFECTED ZONE

/

IN BASE METAL S ?M .$

, t) g e

<,-s r. m

. *g Lcmbert o MccGill o Thomas, Inc.

5023.XXVII.20.49 b Testing

  • Engineering
  • Service
  • Train!ng ys g 2.2.,

7"cN 8-/

TITLE: VISUAL. EXAMINATION PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THE CONDITION OF NUCLEAR PARTS, CO'4PONENTS OR SURFACES Songs 151 VT.1 Esamination Report Unit 2 l.

a.rs. r t 0o. {

$,.shers Caldernie Ed.com  % g g,, jj 1..e, ,

twohe i fort t rat 10tI ,

procedure $ Pe v. Tield Change 0 '

systeet 9s2Dr 0 Corr. 1801 0 Cott. 9 inentsent alesq I

t!evatten I

More Tc N l Equagmentt Jct Eeutral Gray Carst Ligh ting l

seers Mitter Hesestring De, Lee nepiteating Materialss Aesole Misc. Equigaenthta terials t _ ___ _ _. ._ __

m s. a+ee s,,Iai.e n, ~,-  :

OttrONTf4fTrrT 4 #'issa r AW t*At#Tlmi at WKta 12e45 M OvtRLAP 8 CN!PPES P@ff 34 Fwygg pg 4.am CDR8008MN 8.8ma PffTPO

=4, g,;,.. u..in.1, ,2 - eu,.. te. 2 e.t.

.- .. , i i

' " " # 3LetLDraup1t* / /

"**M n era aiwaans am ~ ,. arecova1,

~~~~~- -

s.rei zzz "2 ' '

. tm con,,

wt . m. be / /

O!' _"' .'-"*** " us ka . n. a,w - // ,

Figure 12: VT-1 Examination Report illustrative Only

~

. 1 Lambcrto Ma3GilloTh mas l

, y Testing

  • Engineering
  • Serv e e Santa Clogg $ Page .21 of ja 3*~~*-ted0-j - -

// J l '

SCARF ,

J0!NT

' /

/

.r TEE WELD JOINT O

L l * .

i R.

U "d"

~

%/ LAP g

, , JOINT s '

H g . / / f .

,/- o e

C; c0RNea JOINT

,),

~

FILLET E

l .

LJ/

Y GROOVE g_ y z g U GROOVE 2 -

y J GROOVE

' SOME BASIC JOINT CONFIGURATIONS (Figure 13)

,

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20203E402&oldid=3068669"