ML20202J439
| ML20202J439 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton  |
| Issue date: | 04/10/1986 |
| From: | Siegel B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Nilesh Chokshi, Richumani R, Wescott R NRC |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8604160041 | |
| Download: ML20202J439 (17) | |
Text
- J
. e Docket No. 50-461 APR 10 7986 t
MEMORANDUM FOR: R. Wescott R. Hermann R. Froelich R. Pichumani J. Lazevnick H. L. Roe
! N. Chokshi F. Witt- R. Meck A. Lee- J. Giardina G. Geise Koch A. Masciantonio P. McLaughlin D. Terao N. Wagner J. Lee J. Lombardo l M. Hum M. Lamastra B. Elliott l R. Kirkwood R. Becker J. Levine J. Kudrick J. Spraul R.-Li D. Yue A. Notafrancesca M. McCoy S. West N. Trehan P. Hearns FROM: Byron Siegel, Project Manager BWR Project Directorate No. 4 Division of BWR Licensing
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F CLINTON POWER STATION FSAR AMENDMENT'37 l
Enclosure 1 contains the appropriate sections of the subject FSAR amendment for which each of you have review responsibility. To assist the staff, IP has identified the sections of the FSAR amendment that may require revisions to the SER or SER supplements. These are identified in in Enclosure 2. Please note it continues to be your responsibility to determine if there are any other FSAR changes not identified by the applicant that may require a revision to the staff's SER.
In accordance with Mr. Denton's November 20, 1985 memorandum, the reviewers.
l for Clinton under _the old organization continue to be responsible for review of these FSAR Amendments and the Technical Specifications for NT0L's, unless the new organization agrees to accept the review responsibility.
To support IP's projected fuel load schedule and so I can track the status of the review of these amendments, it is requested that you provide the information called for in Enclosure 3 and return it to me no later than 5 days from the date of this memorandum. My mail stop is P-924. If you have any questions, I can be reached at x29474.
I WW Byron Siegel, Project Manager RWR Project Directorate No. 4 Division of BWR Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated DISTRIBUTION PD#4 PD#4/D l BSiegel:1b WButler 04/10/86 04/gg/86 i
%"NNk A .j
EtiCLOSURE 2 Atttchment.1 ;
to U-600486 l
(
SUMMARY
OF FSAR AMENDMENT 37 CHANGES f CHAPTER 1:
Section 1.1:
Correction of'typographicalierror, l
Section 1.2:
Correction of typographical errors.
Section 1.3:
Revise Table 1.3-6 to be consistent with design.
Section 1.7:
Correction of typographical error in Table 1.7-2.
Section 1.8:
Update Table 1.8-l'to reflect' current Regulatory Guides addressed in FSAR: revise and provide additional information on the compliance to Regulatory Guides (R.G.).
R.G. 1.8 - Clarify project position _regarding the requirements for the Chemist and.the review committee.
R.G. 1.11 -
Clarification to FSAR subsection reference.
R.G. 1.12 - Clarification to project position regarding seismic recorders.
R.G. 1.17 - Clarification to project position concerning alarm systems.
R.G. 1.18 - Correction of typographical error.
R.G. 1.19 -
Editorial corrections.
R.G. 1.32 - Revised project position.
R.G. 1.46 -
Deleted due to.R.G. withdrawal.
R.G. 1.67 - Correction of typographical error. l R.G. 1.68 - Clarification to project position for loss of offsite power test.
R.G. 1.84 - Correction of typographical error.
R.G. 1.85 - Correction of typographical errors change to project position to reflect latest revision of R.G.
R.G. 1.92 - Additional FSAR subsection reference added.
R.G. 1.106 - Clarification to FSAR subsection reference.
R.G. 1.116 - Clarification to project position regarding ANSI N45.2.8.
R.G. 1.127 - Additional FSAR subsection reference added.
R.G. 1.129 - Clarification to FSAR subsection references revise project position regarding the periodicity of battery testing.
R.G. 1.139 Provide project position.
Revision to project position regarding the
,e R.G. 1.140 -
3 use of ANSI N510-1980 and ANSI N509-1976 and 1980.
R.G. 1.143 - Clarification to the inservice leak testing
'e of the demineralizer subsystem.
E.?' e n:,
Q'i Page 1 of 11
~
. Attachmr.nt 1 to U-600486 ik
( R.G. 8.4 - Provideexcep$[$nconcerninguseofpocket dosimeters."- 5.
R.G. 8.12 - Clarificatio'n.3th~ project position
_ .concerning,.-ciijicality accident alarm system. f. ,; JE: -
cc Section 1.9:'
Update Figure 1.9-1.
CHAPTER 2:
Section 2.1:
Corrections to text and Figure 2.1-7.
Section 2.2:
Corrections to text; changes to Tables 2.2-5 and 2.2-6 to
~
reflect current quantities of hazardous chemicals stored within the protected area.
Section 2.3:
Correction of typographical err.or; additions to text to describe backup meteorological system; change to Figure 2.3-18 to show location of backup meteorological tower.
Section 2.4:
' Clarification about the emergency core cooling system outlet structure; Table 2.4-26 revised to reflect Unit 2 cancellation.
Section 2.5:
Clarification to Figure 2.5-274; clarification to source of Figure 2.5-294; update to Figures 2.5-398, 2.5-399, 2.5-402, 2.5-490, and 2.5-491.
Section A2.5:
Clarification to text about the ultimate heat sink.
CHAPTER 3:
Section 3.1:
Clarification to text about isolation valve testing; revise reference concerning environmental monitoring.
Section 3.2:
Changes to Table 3.2-1 to make FSAR consistent with design data; additions to Tables 3.2-2 and 3.2-3 concerning the classification of instrument lines.
Section 3.5: -
Changes to text due to the Bechtel Independent Design Reviev clarification to source of potential missiles; i correction of typographical error on Fizure 3.5-1.
Section 3.6:
Revision to Figure 3.6-1 to reflect current plant design and analyses; revise text to incorporate deletion of arbitrary intermediate breaks.
Paco 2 of 11
(
, Attcchment l !
to U-600486 ,
9
{I '
Section B3.6:
Revision to Tables B3.6-3, B3.6-18, B3.6-19, and B3.6-28 i
and Figures B3.6-3, B3.6-18, B3.6-19, and B3.6-28 to reflect results of postulated ~ pipe break analyses and
- latest break exclusion zone : exemptions revision to Table B3.6-31 and Figure B3.~6-31 to reflect latest stress i l analyses.
! Section D3.6:
Revision to text to reflect NRC break exclusion zone exemption approval, j l
l Section 3.7:
Correction of various typographical errors; clarification ,
to.the time - history accelerograph; correct directions ;
indicated on Figures 3.7-31 and 3.7-32; update Figures 3.7-33, 3.7-34, and Figure 3.7-35 to reflect revised '
analyses.
Section 3.8: )
Correction of typographic ~al errors; revisions to text to ;
reflect current plant design: changes to text and Table !
3.8-1.2 due to the Bechtel Independent Design Reviews clarification to Table 3.8-4. i i
Section A3.8: ;
Typographical error correction. !
Section 3.9: l Clarifications to text regarding valve operability; clarification of the scope of NSSS piping component supports; updates to Tables 3.9-5 and 3.9-6 to reflect current plant design for pump and valve operability.
I Section A3.9:
Typographical error correction, i
l Section 3.10:
l Correction of various tygographical errors; update text to make FSAR consistent with qualification methods; revision to Tables 3.10-1 and 3.10-2-to reflect current seismic and dynamic qualification of safety-related BOP and NSSS equipment.
Section 3.11: l Correction of typographical errors; update text to make FSAR consistent with qualification methods: revisions to l Tables. 3 11-1, 3.11-2, 3.11-3, 3.11-4, and 3.11-5 to
! ' provide updated information relating to the environmental qualification of safety-related BOP and NSSS equipment; replacement of Figure 3.11-16 to reflect analysis
, revision.
l l
Page 3 of 11 E-
_- _ _ = - - .. - - . _. - . - .. . -. -
Attachm:nt 1 to U-600486 f( CHAPTER 5:-
I Section 5.2:
Clarification regarding the use of insulation: revision to text. describing leakage detection to reflect. current designs. editorial change to Table 5.2-1: clarification of 7
l Table 5.2-7: update to Table 5.2-9a.
I Section 5.3:
Correction of typographical errors 7 deletion of extraneous reference.
Section 5.4:
Correction of typographical errors clarification about reactor water cleanup system operations correct valve j
hydrostatic test pressures changes due to the addition of
- the main turbine and feedwater pump turbine trips upon RCIC initiations clarification of the leak rate test of the main steam isolation valves change to the heat transfer rate of-thermal insulation used on the i
i recirculation systems change of discharge rate from crack
, in RHR piping: change to make Table 5.4-1 consistent with
! designs update Figure 5.4-24.
CHAPTER 6:
Section 6.2:
i Correction of various typographical errors revision to text to make FSAR consistent with GESSAR II; clarification regarding containment leakage rate to Table 6.2-1:
clarification to Table 6.2-41: changes to Table 6.2-47 to reflect current plant design: revisions to Figureo~6.2-55, 6.2-111, 6.2-112, 6.2-113, 6.2-114, 6.2-118, and 6.2-119 to reflect current plant design.-
Section 6.3:
Correct typographical errors and provide clarifications to make FSAR consistent with-CPS design: change to Table 6.3-1 to reflect change in diesel generator start times revisions to Tables 6.3-10 and 6.3-11 to reflect current i' plant designs typographical correction to Figure 6.3-80.
Section 6.4: ;
Clarification to the design of the control rotm chillers:
changes to the control room volume reflecting the addition of the Unit 2 control room areas update to Figure l 6.4-1 and 6.4-2.-
~
Section 6.'5:
Revisions to text and Tables 6.5-1 and 6.5-3 to reconcile the use of ANSI N509/N510-1976 versus 1980s update Table 6.5-2 to reflect current plant design; update of Figure 6.5-5.
l Page 4 of 11 i
I r _" . . _ _ _ ~ . - _ - _ . - _ . _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . , _ _ _ _ _ . _ ,_ , , _ , _ _ _ . . . , _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . . _ , . _ _ , _ , . , ~ . _ . . _ _
Attachm2nt 1 to U-600486 l
AI
.s Section 6.7-Revision to text to make FSAR consistent with design !
)
specifications -correction of typographical errors:
clarification regarding MSIVLC' system evaluations revise J text and Tabl'e 6.7-2 due -to new control room habitability analysis.
l CHAPTER 7:
Section 7.1:
Editorial corrections update Table 7.1-13 to reflect. !
Revision 3 of the CPS R.G. 1.97 Compliance Report.
Section 7.2: l Editorial corrections: clarifications to text describing the NSPS: clarify FSAR text regarding scram bypass testing.
Section 7.3:
Editorial corrections:. changes to text to make FSAR consistent with the CPS Physical Security Plan. l
\
I Section 7.4: -
changes due to the addition of the main turbine and feedwater pump turbine trips upon RCIC initiation.
Section 7.5:
Typographical correction to Figure 7.5-4. j Section 7.6: ~
Typographical corrections revision to description of the SGTS exhaust high range radiation monitoring system to make FSAR consistent with plant design..
Section 7.7:
Editorial corrections; clarifications about the display control systems revision to the description of the drywell air cooler monitors.
CHAPTER 8:
Section 8.1:
Typographical error corrections update R.G. 1.75 conformance position statements update R.G. 1.131 l conformance position statement. !
Sectibn 8.2: ;
Update text, Tables 8.2-1 and 8.2-3, and Figures 8.2-1, 8.2-2 and 8.2-4 through 8.2-23 to reflect revisel
- stability analyses and current switchyard design. ,
Page 5 of 11 e- -
Attechm:nt 1 to U-600486
, Section 8.3:
4 Typographical error correction clarification to battery ;
cell equalization voltages clarification to Tables 8.~3-4 '
- and 8.3-18 to-reflect plant designs update.of. Figure 8.3-2a to reflect current plant design revise. Figure j 8.3r3 to reflect number of-transformers installed. '
CHAPTER 9: 1 Section 9.-1:
Editorial corrections; clarification regarding containment polar crane movement.
! Section 9.2:
'- Editorial corrections; clarification to the.drywell chilled water system descriptions revise demineralized 1
water makeup system instrumentation descriptions editorial corrections to text and Table 9.2-6: update equipment l
i cooled by the plant service water system in Table 9.2-1 revise Table 9.2-10 to reflect plant design: clarify-design of the plant service water system pumps: deletion of Unit 2 equipment in Table 9.2-20 change Table 9.2-22 to make consistent with design.
I 1
J ( Section 9.3: ,
i ' Clarification to the suppression pool cleanup system power i generation' design bases: clarification to post accident i sampling system design description and Table 9.3-5 update Figure 9.3'-6 to reflect new concentration requirements.
i Section 9.4:
l Typographical error corrections clarification to the j diesel-generator facility ventilation system descriptions
! revise the CGCS equipment cubicle cooling system i descriptions clarification concerning the off-gas vault j refrigeration system descriptions change to Table 9.4-1 i revise Table 9.4-16 to reflect plant design: change to
! Table 9.4-25 to make consistent with design specifications.
i Section 9.5:
J Editorial corrections revise the fire protection water ,
supply system descriptions update the fire protection l i system description to be consistent with the CPS Fire t Protection Evaluation Report (FPER) and the Safe Shutdown l l Analysis (SSA): update the tank capacities of the fuel oil
} cystems _ clarifications to text and Table 9.5-10 regarding the diesel-generator starting systems changes to make-the l communication system description consistent with plant i designs update design information in Table 9.5-5: update j i Figure'9.5-5.
V l 4
Page 6 of 11
3 Attcchm2nt 1 to U-600486
(-
CHAPTER 10: .
Section 10.2: -
Update turbine protection system description; deletion of Figure 10.2-6'. -
Section 10.4:
Editorial correction; clarification to the turbine building elevation at which watertight seals are provided.
CHAPTER 11:
Section 11.2:
Clarification of the liquid waste management systems capabilities; revision of liquid radwaste tank design considerations; update Table 11.2-3 to make FSAR consistent with current design.
Section 11.3:
Editorial correction; clarification of the off-gas system low flow alarm; revision to make the FSAR consistent with the off-gas liquid seal design; editorial corrections to Table 11.3-8; typographical error correction to Table 11.3-9.
Section 11.4:
Revision to text to make FSAR consistent with the wet solid waste subsystem design; deletion of Figure 11.4-4.
Section 11.5:
Typographical error corrections; update Table 11.5-2 to be consistent with current design.
CHAPTER 12:
Section 12.1:
Editorial correction.
Section 12.3:
Clarification on the use of ladders and galleries in ,
radiation areas; revise the design objectives of the area radiation monitoring system; change to the design and evaluation of drywell penetrations; revision to the R.G. 8.12 position statements; deletion of text describing the criticality accident monitor system to reflect R.G.
8.12 conformance position; update of Figure 12.3-19;
~
-deletion of Figure 12.3-65.
Section 12.5:
t Clarification regarding R.G. 8.12 project position.
Page 7 of 11
j Attachment l' to U-600486 l
l
(. -CHAPTER 13: . l l
Section 13.1: ' l l
Clarification of which personnel are Facility Review Group members; change to.make F,SAR shift staffing levels consistent with the Technical Specifications; editorial-cor.rection to Table 13.1-2;. deletion of Table.13.1-3; i clarification to Figure 13.1-3 to be consistent with the j Technical Specifications. ,
1 Section 13.2: )
Clarification of the courses required for STA training; revisions to make FSAR consistent with licensed operator requalification program; clarification to Figure 13.2-1. ,
1 1
l Section 13.3:
Editorial correction.
l Section 13.4:
Revision concerning NRAG membership.
Section 13A:
Revision to reflect change in personnel. .
CHAPTER 14:
Section 14.2:
Correction of various typographical errors; changes to I incorporate latest revision of General Electric Test i Specification; revisions to various test abstracts to
' reflect current system designs; changes to reflect Unit 2 cancellation; update of Table 14.2-4.
CHAPTER 15:
Section 15.2:
Typographical error correction to Table 15.2.6-1.
Section 15.3:
Clarification regarding recirculation pump trip analysis.
Section 15.4:
Typographical error correction.
Section 15.5:
Changes to text and Tables 15.5.1-1 and 15.5.1-2 due to the addition of the main turbine and feedwater pump
., turbine trips upon RCIC initiation.
Section 15'.6:
Editorial'co'rrections to text and Table 15.6.4-5; revise
, text and Tables 15.6.5-1, 15.6.5-2, 15.6.5-3, 15.6.5-5, and 15.6.5-6 due-to new control room habitability analysis.
Page 8 of 11 e
yn -
. Attcchm2nt 1 to U-600486 Section 15.7:
Editorial changes; revisions to Tables 15.7.1-5 and 15.7.1-6 to reflect current analyses clarification to Table 15. 7. 4 -1. -
CHAPTER 17:
Section 17.2:
Various editorial changes changes to reflect current responsibilities for the quality assurance program; editorial change to Figure 17.2-2. (None of these changes result in a decrease of quality assurance program commitments.)
APPENDIX B: '
, Section B.4:
Changes to reflect examination methods'for welded attachments to the containment liner; clarification regarding material specifications.
Section B.5:
Changes to make FSAR consistent with weld testing methods. j APPENDIX D: )
l I.A.l.1:
Revision to the variations of CPS STA training.
I.C.1:
Editorial correction.
I.D.1 l
pdate to reflect Detailed Control Room Design Review program.
I.G.1 hypographicalcorrection.
I II.B.2-Revise operator doses.
II.B.3:
Change the method of chloride and boron analysis. -
II.D.1:
l Clari.fic.ation of licensing submittal editorial )
correction.
II.E.4.2: ;
i i Clarification concerning a licensing submittals correction l
to Table D-2. ]
I i
! Page 9 of 11
)
. Attcchm2nt 1 to U-600486
?
Section 15.7:
Editorial changes; revisions to Tables 15.7.1-5 and 15.7.1-6 to reflect current analyses; clarification to j
Table 15. 7. 4 -l . .
CHAPTER 17:
Section 17.2:
Various editorial changes; changes to reflect current-responsibilities for the quality assurance program; editorial change to Figure 17.2-2. (None of these changes result in a decrease of quality assurance program commitments.)
APPENDIX B:
Section B.4:
Changes to reflect examination methods for welded attachments to the containment liner; clarification regarding material specifications.
Section B.5:
2 Changes to make FSAR consistent with weld testing methods.
APPENDIX D:
,r I . A 1 's,1 :
y Rhy1,s, ion to the variations of CPS STA training.
I.C.1:
! Editorial correction.
j I.D.1 pdate to reflect Detailed Control Room Design Review program.
I.G.1 iypographicalcorrection.
II.B.2:
Revise operator doses.
II.B.3:
Change the method of chloride and boron analysis.
II.D.1:
Clarific.ation of licensing submittal; editorial
' correction.
II.E.4.2:
)i Clarification concerning a licensing submittal; correction to Table D-2.
Page 9 of 11
- Attachment 1 to U-600486 II.F.1:
Editorial changes; revisions to reflect current calibration methods; changes to reflect plant design.
11.K.3.46: -
Update to include current, status of this action plan.
III.A.l.1:
Revise to reflect current Emergency Plan revision.
III.A.1.2:
Update to describe present emergency response facilities.
III.A.2:
Revise to reflect current Emergency Plan revision.
QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES:
Chapter 2: .
Clarification regarding the UHS volume lost.
Chapter 3:
Editorial corrections; clarification to details of pipe attachments; revisions to update responses to questions in which design or procedures have since changed or in which analyses that were previously open have been completed.
Chapter 4:
Update response to reflect' current analyses and evaluations.
Chapter 6:
Revise to reflect current plant design.
Chapter 8:
1 Change to incorporate revised analysis; clarification of the transformer circuit switcher design; revision due to Unit 2 cancellation.
Chapter 9:
Editorial corrections; changes to incorporate information regarding the onsite communications system; revise response to reflect current plant design; clarification of response regarding ice buildup in the diesel-generator air intake and exhaust system; update response to be consistent with the CPS FPER and SSA.
Chapter 12: .
Revised response to reflect latest plant procedures; typographical correction.
Chapter 13:
Typographical correction; update response to reflect provision for backup meteorological data.
Page 10 of 11
Attnchment 1
, to U-600486 (l Chapter 14:
Updates to reflect Unit 2 cancellations clarification regarding the use.of Figure 14.2-7.
Chapter 17: -
Clarify response regarding-containment electrical-penetrations revise response regarding the SPDS.
i
~
Page 11 of 11
. Attcchment 2 to U-600486 (I CPS FSAR CHANGES WITH POSSIBLE SER IMPACT FSAR Section Changed Impacted SER Section 1.8 (Regulatory Guide 8.12) 12.3.4.1 2.3.3 , -
2.3.3 Table 3.2-1 3.2 Table 3.2-2 3.2 Table 3.2-3 3.2 3.5.3 17.5 3.5.4 17.5 Figure 3.6-1 3.6 Tables B3.6-3, 18, 19, 28 17.5.4.4 Figures B3.6-3, 18, 19, 28 17.5.4.4 D3.6.4 ^ 17.5 Figures 3.7-31 and 3.7-32 3.7 3.8.4.4 17.5 3.8.7 17.5 Table 3.8-1.2 17.5 Tables 3.9-5 and 3.9-6 ~
3.9.3.2 Tables 3.10-1 and 3.10-2 3.10 Tables 3.11-1 and 3.11-2 3.11 5.2.5.1.3 5.2.5 6.2.5.1.2.4.1 6.2.5 6.5.1 6.5
(, Tables 6.5-1 and 6.5-3 6.5 6.7.3.8.1 and Table 6.7-2 6.4, 15.3 Table 7.1-13 7.5.1.1 7.2.1.1.4.4.6 7.2.2-7.6.1 7.6.1, 11.5.1, 12.3.4 8.2 8.2.2 Tables 8.2-1 and 8.2-3 48.2.2 Figures 8.2-1, 8.2-2 and 1 8.2-4 through 8.2-23 8.22 9.3.7 9.3.5 Table 9.3-5 9.3.5 9.4.5.5 9.4.5 9.5.1 9.5 9.5.1.2.2.2 9.5.1.1 9.5.6.1.1 9.6.5 9.5.6.2 9.6.5 9.5.6.3 9.6.5 9.5.6.5 9.6.5 13.1.2.3 13.1.2.1 Figure 13.1-3 - 13.1.2.1 13.2.1.1.1 '
13.1.2.1 15.6.-5.5, Tables 15.6.5-1, 15.6;5-2,~15.6.5.3, 15.6.5-5,
~
and 15.6.4-6 6.4, 15.3 Figure 17.2-2 17 i Appendix D (I.A.1.1) 13.1.2.1
. Appendix D (II.B.3) 9.3.5 Appendix D (II.F.1) 11.5.1, 12.3.4 Page 1 of 2
- c. . .. . .
\
'; 1
, Attachment 2
, to U-600486
(. FSAR Section Changed Impacted SER Section Question and Response Chapter 6 (#450.1) -
6.4 Question and Response Chapter 9 (f410.7) 9.5.1 t
1 Page 2 of 2
l l
Enclosure 3 RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY REVIEW 0F CLINTON FSAR AMENDMENT 37
~
NAME OF REVIEWER:
DATE:
FSAR AMENDMENT SECTIONS REVIEWED:
NO CHANGES TO THE SER OR SUPPLEMENTS REQUIRED:
CHANGES TO THE SER OR SUPPLEMENTS REQUIRED:
IF CHANGES ARE-REQUIRED SER SUPPLEMENT 6 INPUT WILL BE PROVIDED BY (N0 LATER THAN MAY 9, 1986):
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION MAY BE REQUIRED:
Please return to Byron Siegel MS P-924 within 5 days of date on memorandum.
DISTRIBUTION w/o Enclosure 1 Docket. File; NRC PDR Local PDR .
PD#4 Reading. _
B. Siegel M. O'Brien ~
M. Srinvasan J. Hulman W. Hodges L. Phillips G. Loinas B.D. Liaw D. Vassallo C. Thomas
- 0. Parr W. Regan J. Knight R. Ballard C. Berlinger J. Milhoan -
F. Rosa V. Benaroya Z. Rosztoczy.
H. Bocher R. Bosnak i
~_
),,, UNITED STATES 1
[ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5 :j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
/
APR 101966 Docket No. 50-461 -
l ~
~
MEMORANDUM FOR: R. Wescott R. He'rmann R. Froelich R. Pichumani J. Lazevnick H. L. Roe N. Chokshi F..Witt R. Meck A. Lee J. Giardina G. Geise Koch A. Masciantonio P. McLaughlin D. Terao N. Wagner J. Lee J. Lombardo M. Hum M. Lamastra B. Elliott R. Kirkwood R. Becker J. Levine J. Kudrick J. Spraul R. Li D. Yue A. Notafrancesca M. McCoy S. West N. Trehan P. Hearns FROM: Byron Siegel, Project Manager BWR Project Directorate No. 4 Division of BWR Licensing
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F CLINTON POWER STATION FSAR AMENDMENT 37 Enclosure 1 contains the appropriate sections of the subject FSAR amendment for which each of you have review responsibility. To assist the staff, IP has identified the sections of the FSAR amendment that may require revisions to the SER or SER supplements. These are identified in in Enclosure 2. Please note it continues to be your responsibility to determine if there are any other FSAR changes not identified by the applicant that may require a revision to the staff's SER.
In accordance with Mr. Denton's November 20, 1985 memorandum, the reviewers for Clinton under the old organization continue to be responsible for review of these FSAR Amendments and the Technical Specifications for NT0L's, unless the new organization agrees to accept the review responsibility.
To support IP's projected fuel load schedule and so I can track the status of the review of these amendments, it is requested that you provide the information called for in Enclosure 3 and return it to me no later than 5 days from the date of this memorandum. My mail stop is P-924. If you have any questions, I can be reached at x29474. ~
- 1 th
.~ B ron Siegel, Project Manager BWR Project Directorate No. 4 Division of BWR Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated l
1
~
_