ML20202F346

Summarizes 980206 Meeting in Arlington,Tx Re Status of Facility Performance Improvement Plan Actions,Status of Actions to Improve Performance of Engineering Organization & Actions Taken to Resolve Concerns Re CAP self-assessment

ML20202F346
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	02/11/1998
From:	Gwynn T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Dugger C ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
References
NUDOCS 9802190181
Download: ML20202F346 (102)

Text

-.

2 k'

444 UNITED ST ATES 9

d

/

,I+g NUCLCAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

'- ).1 REGION IV 6,

611 RY AN PL AZA DRIVE, SUITE 400

%,.'.V [

AR LINGTON, TEXAS 760118064 FEB l l 1999 Charles M. Dugger, Vice President O,~ rations - Waterford 3 Entergy Operations, Inc.

P,0.BoxB Killona, Louisiana 70066

SUBJECT:

WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT MEETING

Dear Mr. Dugger:

This refers to the meeting conducted in the Region IV Training Conference P.oom in Arlington, Texas, on February 6,1998. The meeting included discussions of the status of the Waterford 3 Performance improvement Plan actions, status of actions to irnprove performance of the engineering organization, and actions taken to resolve concerns generated by your corrective action program self assessment.

We found the discussions to be detailed and informative, with a valuable exchange of information that increased our understanding of your performance in most of the areas reviewed, in accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Piactice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Documery Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely, omas P. G nn, Di cto Division of Rea or P oject Docket No.: 50-382 License No.: NPF-38

Enclosures:

1. Attendance List

[

2. Licensee Presentation lifII.ll.llllILlilll ll 9802190181 980211 PDR ADOCK 05000382 p

PDR

n..

o 1

Entergy Operations, Inc.

2-cc.

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.

Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box 31995 Jackson, Mississippl 39286-1995 Vice President, Operations Support Entergy Operations, Inc.

- P.O. Box 31995 -

Jackson, Mississippi 39286-1995 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway

. P.O. Box 651 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 General Manager, Plant Operations Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Manager-Licensing Manager Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066

- Chairman Louisiana Public Seslice Commission One American Place, Suite 1630 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825-1697 Director, Nuclear Safety &

Regulatory Affairs Waterford 3 SES Entergy Operations, Inc.

P.O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Nilliam H. Spell, Administrator Louisiana Radiation Protection Division P.O. Box 82135 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70884-2135

~

.. -. -. ~.. -... -.

4 Entergy Operations, Inc. Parish President St. Charles Parish P.O. Box 302 Hahnville, Louisiana 70057 -

Mr. William A. Cross Bethesda Licensing Office 3 Metro Center '

Suite 610 --

Bethesda,' Maryland 20814 :

Winston & Strawn 1400 L Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20005-3502 4

4 J

I d

Je t

e-Entergy Operations, Inc, FEB l 1 1998 4

bec to DCD (IE45) bec distrib. by RIV;

• Regional Administrator Resident inspector

• DRP Director DRS-PSB

• Branch Chief (DRP/D)

MIS System r

Project Engineer (DRP/D)

RIV File Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

• w/o Enclosure 2 4

DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\_WAT\\WT2-6MS.DRP To receive copy of document, Indicate in box: "C" = Copy without enclosyres "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy RIV:PE:DRP/D 6

C:DRP/Da4

' D:DRP b

GAPick:df PHHarre%

TPGwynn V I i

2/10 /98 2/to /98 2/ fl /98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

1 I.

'I.6 gi t

I-Entergy Operations, Inc.

4 b

bec to DCD (IE45) bec distrib. by RIV:

• Regional Administrator Resident inspector

• DRP Director DRS-PSB

• Branch Chief (DRP/D)

MIS System Project Engineer (DRP/D)

RIV File -

Branch Chief (DRP/TSS)

• w/o Enclosure-2

-1 DOCUMENT NAME: R:\\_ VAT \\WT2-6MS.DRP To receive copy of document, Indicate in box: "C" = Copy without enclosyres "E" = Copy with enclosures "N" = No copy RIV:PE:DRP/D 6

C:DRP/Du,Q D:DRP M

GAPick;df PHHarre%

TPGwynn V I 2/IO /98 2/ to /98 2/lI /98 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY I 900Il8

ENCLOSURE 1 MEETING: PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN MEETING DATE: February 6, 1998

.g ATTENDANCE LIST "4

(PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY)

NAME ORGANIZATION

. POSITION TITLE 7 MRR. ELL L. D. h$.C 49AEdC4 W C b'? wew uvann Muor Disnt ouak Ent, c. a,o, oe, w,,wrcaoi/ coa n.m a,',,,%m l2,& cm Oca vw e :

LMRkhdD 3 lfD L h&r/WM MMcm

?$5 'tem 6 k v+rmnx a Uni kvan n,wcar 11ron Cauct 30ssi:iu u>n rr1Focy a / Ear Y. A Oto - bJ 3 s

l a ws E4ek /sor vP, P nE%m ko 5 N)kAf5 X b)ATF,2F0AD3lEer D /A.5 0 U K b Sig,0 E g 7 7 Beow m,o uionou 3 /m m a n s is a c m,.

+

kraa E l/owrr l4mno3/Es1 ser &,, - a's Iim3 Gc ad A Wdercm / EOI.

L ic en s,'on Mana w Kiion AO/ sob Uwfe<GdUE0I

&< kens A o 4,Aees Und a % n' h~

uLNRc Ruch, (Nw eNr fr-o u>e US AblC b'r if)2(

0N4 (17erstAh L259bW S-e./ Sins'n s

d

!;t,}{.I

,;.1r,s ;l:r[t1 llll,

,t 1

_ O n

a n

lP wSy5;9, gu-.. -

o

, *..'. p -cg;.

• )x.<g' t.^

u;r i

wh s

hg4 i ln r-t 9

m c;b ; 1.,3:m '

g,.

mi sg pQ@g;:

l n

.~

9 ; hn&

i

i. ;

n e

2.':

.u1:

m, y:.~=

'2.~

~

t El me e

8 mR:c ; f f'. n% -

oMX

...,lh

.::.': f' 9

3 e

vs~.

C

~

9

An.

z l

a3 9

O,s T fg*..

{

ysT1 d

v c

r o

wf-.

k',e. c;,

r u

'., E' v r'. w,n, e.

ot n6 s-

~[

c o

r.

7&

bs'+ '

[

t ao a

~

Wn+2 Qp at t y

f p

e m ms' u:

al m

Sgr i =. ;~, ~]?

l r

a

}

u n

?.na e-glyi u

u > *,l'f-M::v%l.

m3,1%*-.

_ f.,

O a

e u2 l

r t

I

c. -

eh rb

1. _ Rt Ae g'.

.a

[ 'g v n.t

~%~7'}

n Wc 4

o F

r

~

r.

m, '

_f h 7

..a. ~ -;

aM

'8 n

e a

-l$

u

m4 l

~

d 3

~ ~,,..

ci

:a',?; =. : -

--,N rcg^

uB mc mM -

N r

g' a h ':<

[

o S

m.+:M<..

f

, y: s.

wi ; #

^

r U

e P

1 "7

_ O i-

.i,4#ee t

(,

6v m.

y t

tl

!!ti l

l ii.

O O

O Waterford Performance Improvement Plan L

Agenda l

r a

t:

.s

$js,gil introductions C. Dugger /

@%.a E. Merschoff m

1

';.

. ^ - ;

1 Overview of Improvement Plan T. Leonard 4

Design Bases Review and T. Brennan TS LCO instrument Uncertainty Evaluation Project i

Engineering A. Wrape F. Titus I

Problem Resolution D. Vinci Open Discussion All i

)

1

,4-,n_.,,-a.~a-u-.a~~.o.~.e>.

-- u e

-~ -v ~

sa=m~~-

l 4

l b

O

!O j

I l

i C

CO (1.

l W

C l

l E

e E

ce O

C i

w o

l CL e

O E

J n

e O

F-i O

A.

3 l

i t

1 4

g W

N

--n:v-y.;..

b w;41.;.

.,s iv() hi..

.; y, l

,.cin <

t- _'. itTr t*:z -.. -

e.--

N------

-,.,-,,.n r

O O

O

-l

}

Performance Improvement Plan Status J

4 n-p '

e' hA '

y x &; j[f$ pww.

Scheduled

b. UMM

~

~

1

'^^'Ijj;;n;&<f l c);

-~

,. ;&' < : &f WQ:iLrfm xt: w -.

+

- ~ :t -,4&:6' =:.: :}yf _ ;;:-. :....

p ;-p;-g

Q7 7 9 c.

sr. -

a;;;>y;:ye:

e

.,, e

.c_~

~ ;5s>l]:p;c,2_1, _::l'g*':.l.fg;);.'QP

' ': Qa ~~ -~

g.,.

g,. eq,

- v:7 :

s-5,,

.ll

$f

.~

....y y".

r q::q:;

• A-7: _ }, 2. i.3:h:3

^}

- 337 g gw y

,; u

.. _~

rT., [. MYY

~ f, q:

'9;

.. :f qZes y

.,,-

• c

. f'-

3..

st r

{;;;.

iiKi%

-Q:,_

~"~

J hi

+

f "u ;;g g, _;

^8.

L;.

g

,

'p' ()ch

?%

9 4

' _ _. ~;.Q )- -

k,_ ' h&_ ;t

3 7Nf 4 A- -

-l.

hhh:,;Qly_g}{

e.#,,,

aw /e

E Vh fl '; l

. ' k ff :::,f;b ;;,v;

_y n ;f.

• s_:pl f,f? Sl

~

{

f[

-- :ga 13p zg g::4 qc3 m

+~,,_

.a ;_o :; z q.

-~ :-

ysg __

- 4%

y.

a n

n

. m_ y u; z

y-a::m ypg.

_ by;~.z

--:D 4;.. '.:49 ig;^':gg:M 99 Total PIP Actions PIP Actions are on schedule 3

/

1, SafetyCultureImprovements tw:

e Increased communication of Regulatory Issues to employees e Trained employees on Regulatory Process /

Perspective e Conducted Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment e Completed Corrective Action Program Assessment and implemented most actions 4

~

O O

O-i Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment - Overview t

,,, N?) 4 Er a

i is;edi EFF1 RW e Contracted SYNERGY

~v%

. f-l.

+ OralInterviews I

+ Written Survey i

e Concentrated on Six Areas i

+ Identification / Resolution

+ Management influence t

+ Employee Concerns Program

+ Willingness i

+ Personal Experience

+ Nuclear Safety Culture 5

l

.i

)

.O O

O 4

Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment-Trend of Employee Ratings i% ;

$3.5---

=7 3---

=

a

[ 2.s -

E 2-1 I

I

' -'I I

Ident1 Resol.

Mgmt. Infl.

ECP Willingness Personal Exp.

NSC E1996 01997

-1997 Ind Avg Area of Inquiry 6

O O

O' i

~~

l

\\

~

Corrective Action Program Assessment - Status 1

~

'f' 1

YN :;e: Nk

%d e Revised Corrective Action Procedure l

+ Improvements observed in documentation of Operability i

Determinations j

+ Procedure is more standardized to other Entergy Sites j

e Emphasis placed on the inclusion of Industry Experience in Root Cause Analyses e Revised the Categorization Process for Condition l

Repods

+ Increased flexibility in Condition Report classification i

e implemented more tools for operators i

7

1;;

!l;l!;l i!j,l1il>

i!

ll!t!

i; 8

s tn e

r s

t o

n m

f la e

e g

c n

m n

o n

e i

t n

i v

a a

ia o

h n

r r

n r

t p

E e

d m

tn n

m s

a s

i I

l t

o t

s a

n r

o n

e g

e T e

n o

m m

i l

e e e

r s

p P

v n

o u o

m r

a e

l i

t o

pC v

r t

i mt e

o tc o

d p

I A

eo y

e e

cR R

t i

v nl l

i aa b

s n

i t

r o

c mn a o i

t e

r o

r t

t i

r oi o a d

t r

r i

f o

rd pe n

C ed ep o

Pa Ro C

e e

e

"/'

JJ

mSMjT.

i

=

L b u F 5 ~-

,!4

,ja i;

~

~

.O O

O~

Industrial Safety Accident Rate

,f

{ Utility & Contract Personnel}

4 g;

4 a

M OSHA k+ N,g 1,4 Recm-dables

-- -i:

Good a

MonthlyISAR

~'

1.2-y

--*-- YTD ISAP

~~3y 1.0 -

3

~

5

- + - ISAR Target o

m o.8 1 O

4

-- 2 a) 3 E

g j

o.6 }

M m

O cy o.4 {- - - * - - + - * - - * - * - -

- * - - + -

-+-

-*- -+--+-.--+--+--*--+--+__3 %

._.E.E.

o o.o

,E S k k &,E 3, <F a t B 8,E t a E R,E 3' <F a t B 8

u. m < z mozo

u. m < m mozo Ibhb/Ibb7 Primary True North Goat:

Operate Waterford 3 Safety 9

~

o o

o-i e

Collective Radiation Exposure id 7 7 we m m w ~ mi

^

E CRefueLOstage 8M1 YTD =

4 6 0 -_

3 F

w -x 5

^*

ph%:!

a p ^si $ "~~,, -

149.5 ManRem w

m7d g1 1

qug..

c3 44, -

-hv M,icM+y:4 P,73 av4 e

140 - -

,, g i-L 4% ~

.. 8

?i

^

m E

"'s

1. w % e = s e W y + + w n 4

e 120 - -

K.

Q s..,;

=hw m f4

.a..,.

y w,, y,.

.c n

7 :=# 2%4: s4+W#9 c

4 m

100 -

-t w 4,

,.~?y;,- ay ya n

g

-m g

u

,~t m.

p.

^%

r.

A

~ f;r@:=a[H

? 1

&,, A'd,-

3 r

T GOOD y,_..

W s

hrhies m o,d' 80 -

rm,,

_ m u

3 y a

(f) f.;

NYrK; 441 1

jgd:3!Q}

Vi M g g f,+ + Q+ - =-=+--

O O-60 -

+ + = = =

-4 I

($&.-, $

]

M Month

• v nm,aJFi +?,g

--*-- YTD V

40 -

r

~ m "mg=5 - - -W - -

---~-

c m

+ -n a

- +.

a y

3-Yr Avg E

p g

e :g;

%q

~ ~ isin hibd

- f 20 -

~#.ms

~+

va w

ne arQQ :"::;d

_,'Q r;

)

(

0-1 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I907 Primary True North Goat Operate Waterford 3 Safety 10

^

l Exposure Comparisons - 1997 to Previous Best Years ih

?!

h r;}l 137.94 140 -

130.4 121.92 120 -

-+-

109 100 -

E 80 -

3; U.

g 7;

8c 60 -

a

1997-g

h E.

40 -

s5I d

20 -

12.91 11,64 0

i i

3-year Avg.

Normal Operations Refuel Outage 11 A

A IT

~

O O

O 1

Waterford 3 Staffing V ;A us m

~ 885 880 -

860 -

838 840 -

p 820 -

] 800 -

1997 m

2 5

766 765 768 766 763 762 765 767 767 767 767 766 761 l-760 -

740 -

720 -

700 -

680 -

3 5

g 7

m c

m o

z o

c 8

8 8

?

F

.R 4

?

5 e.S 5

sl 12

l!!j l

jill!

_~

3 1

O no it i

dno C

g s

n i

n t

e e

e d

m e

l b

ru a

m a

b e

t n

s r

t o

"w i

t t

s u

a t

b r

o t

n e

N ne p

O e

e O

t m

i m

g x

e r

n i

e a

o F

v s g

o e l

s a

s a

r u

t n

c g

pa i

a g

o n

md o

f i

M t

i d

n e

l t

k e

e nu g

c s

m ad o

a a

b e

e ct l

ir l

k r

p f

c io l

c a

n m

np a

t g

I I

ie B

o

+

+

T SR e

e g/

O.

1 i

jwMH.

s.

S; tpmEi.

l,

Total Backlog / Backlog > 90 Days Old

[: ep:((

3500 M

trol tifg"*

M Engineering Requests m 2599 __

~ 2000 --

L. J Condition Reports g

M Operator Work s00 --

~ 2'y',' Ell"' "' "

L :

0 teunte3 8isie 4

4 I$ oui [f[0$$sonce y

O O

O' OWA Backlog / OWA Backlog > 90 Days Old 7

y

}

h /[y]

40

~ma m Operator WorkArounds 35 __

30 --

-*-OWA BecMog> 90 Doys ad y;

E

$_ 25 --

20 --

20 E

as 15 --

Operator Work Aroundiare E

separated from the Total 10 --

Backlog chart due.to the low number relative to the entire 5--

backlog picture.

J 0

lElE:E:E:E:E s

.o c

en

a. ~

>o co

.o c

{E$$$5 5 55O $E$E$$$5 4

4 Frimary True North Goal:

Expeditiously Fix Problems Om 15

=

o o

o

~

/

yA l

-O Condition Report Initiation Rate

/

q 350 100 m

[T..,y %. d 3 0 0 --- - ----

- g8 l

h$

=.

=_ _.=_

=-

=

==n

=

3

=

=

=

=

=

250 -

=_

^

$200

- 96 0

• 150 --

- - ~

_ 94 l

y 100 --

-r-

-- 92 50 --

l 0-'+-+"+':

90 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan

'96

'97

'98 t

i Significant L a Non-SigniHcant i

i

-*- Goal-Self-identify > 98% of CR's

-+- Rolling average % Self-id>ntiMed j

Primary True North Goal:

We Should Find Our Own Problems 16

.O O

O~

l j

1 Q

\\

E Condition Reports Initiated vs. Manhours Worked lO l

1 i

I ii

?; -

n "id 400 --

-- 250000 l

375 --

350 --

22 321 325 --

M CRs -+- Manhours

-- 200000

.i 300--

279 e 275 --

8

@ 250 --

229 228

-- 150000 i f

i

- 225 --

E O

192 90 g 200 --

181 184 W

373 1

167 0

-Q 175 --

161 u

i E

147 144 141 14s

-- 100000 g

s 150 -~124 I

h Z

125 --

100 --

Z 75 -_

-- 50000 I

50 --

25 --

I 0

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

l 0

EEEEEEEEEEEE 55555555$$55 6 2 e

c 5.

6 2 6, & 4 5

6 e2 c

c 5.

6 2 6, 6. e so 3

U o

e e

G-e 3

U o

e N

0-e 3

3 e

e e

a 2 < 2

,3 3

e 7 1 2 < 2 7

< m O z o ',n

< m O z o 7

i Month i

17

~

O

.O O~

4'L OtherActions i,

g -;;

l n m :n e Safety System availability remains slightly better than the industry median e Work management process improvements

+ 12 week schedule widely accepted

+ Work Week Managers functional 18

o o

o

-l

~

d UnP anned Automatic Scrams l

7 aff per 7000 Hours Critical t

6, #a; 2.0 = =

(( A_$_i,

. # Scrams l

@Rf, l

- - * -- Target c~

.. ;~.

3-YrAvg

^;

GOOD i

r 3.5

+

LLI i

.s s$

l g

s l

3 1.0-e - - + - s + - - - '- -4-.........-.-+..........................,__.,.

[

g-I

'a.

4

-a - *.* - m.

a 4 i

E s

~

O i

s i

a g

4 a -a-4

-a - 4 g,, 6 - m-0.5 -

.t.!

e a

a a

a a

a e

a s

a a

a a

a L

a a

a a

e a

a ll 0.0 I

c

_o 5-x c m

o.

+U

>o c

.n 5-x c a

o.

• G o

N k N 3

3 N

k N 3

G O

G O

G G

a < z

,3

< m z < z

,3

< mozo

,N 3

G o z o

,G D

m m

1b9b/19b7 f

Primary Tsue North Goat:

Maintain Equipment in Top Notch Working Order 39

{

l

~

l e

O O~

^

t f

^

l ya Emergency AC Unavailability i

i i

0.035 = =

l i

i l

GOOD 4

~

l

+A' HT 0.030 -

y l f l:

y, I

b 0.025 !

~ - + - - - - * - - - - - * -

J.

00 l

Month 0.020 - -

I

~ YTD

- * - Target 0.015 - -

Z

-

• 3-Yr Avg 3

0 0.010 2 0.005

-a----

y,,-,; 7,; ;;,,-,,,,,,,

_c 0.000 1

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1

1997 Primary True North Goat Maintain Equipment in Top Notch Woiking Order 20 s

1

R O

O O'

/

r.

\\ k p

Emergency Feedwater {EFW} Unavailability g.

0.160 ;

=

v

{

Maintenance / Troubleshooting of esg" l

0.140; AB EFW took 64 hours7.407407e-4 days <br />0.0178 hours <br />1.058201e-4 weeks <br />2.4352e-5 months <br /> following GOOD

' failed post-maintenance test.

- -Y

_F-0.120 {

a Month m

0.100 2-4 4

~ YTD a_

h 0.080 -

- +- Ta p t

-

• 3-Yr Avg 4

z 3

0.060 {

3g 0.040 5-. - - - - - + - - -. -

0.020

~ ^ ~ ~ ~

~

l

~~

0.000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Primary True North Goat Maintain Equipment in Top Notch Working Crder 21 m.

d

~

O O

O~

I High Pressure Safety Injection {HPSI)

Pj Unavailability i

d 0.025 --

D GOOD

" v y" 3 f

• - - - - * - - - - * - - - - - - - * - - - - + - - - - * - - - * - - - - * - - - - * - -

- * - - - - - + - - - - +

0.020 - -

b

.J 5

M Month 3

0.015- -

• YTD

- * - Target

-

• SYr Avg Z

0.010 - -

a 5

n.

I u.005 - -

q_,,,

m af 10.000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1997 Primary True North Goal:

Maintain Equipment in Top Notch Working Order 22

l Scaffolding Reductions

,n b

e Original Scope 26

+ Permanent Replacement 14

)

+ Active Design / Working 12 e New Scope 21

+ Permanent Replacement 11

+ Active Design / Working 10 e Increased Emphasis on Industrial Safety e Reduced Long Term Scaffolding 25 23

o o

o-~>l Other Actions ' cont'd1 r

r O

i 15 4

i iv i

l RB1 e Human Performance Improvements

+ Error Reduction Technique Training on Schedule i

+ Technology Transfer Common Cause / Root Cause i

+ Procedure adherence task force j

t l

i i

I I

I 24 I

i

~

O O

O I

p Procedure Non-Compliance gy w~ j 1.4 w

L_J # CR's/10.000 1.2 -

manhours a

w Z

-*- Goal < 0.4 c

1-m 2

8 0.8-

--= -------- ---- -------

O-O r-0.6 -

~

m E

O 0.4 -- =

=

=

5

=

=

5

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

=

~o 0.2 ---

0 c

-2 e

a u

o e

a n

o e

o c

-2 m

a m

2 O

z a

a o

o o

c m

m a

a e

o e

m e

u.

1 1

u>

0 z

a u-1 1

v>

e Primary True North Goat Procedures Are To Be Simple, Clear Correct and Mowed 25 8

m

. =:

u y

g n__

4 n

C

!O o

a 1

c

>LI CL l

l D

3:

C CO i

._>t O

e E

oc o

e C

C M

2 e3 cc lO mC E

i CO l

D O

E C

.C_D 2 DQCO O

_J CO F--

l 0 ~~ L 7

..;1,

l c.

;J1

- - ~. - - - -... - - -

~

0 O

O

=

/

Design Bases Review-Background 3-y b._ _.

l e Systemwide Design Basis Evaluation Effort e Design Basis Initiatives e 50.54f e Performance Improvement Plan 27

~

.o o

o J

\\

Design Bases Review-Program j

/

.[y s~

l e Program Concept l

+ Discovery Phase f

+ Corrective Action Phase i

e implementation

+ Pilot Program j

+ Full Program implementation i

28 i

9 9

9 l

l Design Bases Review-status v

73 h@$

l l

Discovery Discovery Corrective l

Complete in Progress Action in i

Progress I

i Risk Significant 7

3 7

i Non-Risk i

l Significant Systems 3

l l

l

{

l

~

6

~

O O

O~

~

i".

Design Bases Review - Results

/"

he

~m inc;d e Reviewed Over 7850 Documents e Reviewed Approximately 940 Calculations e 12 Condition Reports Generated e No Major System Functional Concerns Identified

I l

jl!

(

i

~

_O n

a s

s e

r y

s t

d c

n s

d a

e g

Ar m

n u

yc u

id lr c

c n

aa o

i F

en D

l I

Ct n

n w

o e e

_ O e

t e

d m

w iv eu e

r e

t s

et R

e Ns B

u n

s s

s sI e

e t

r s

s i

s no c

i f

e i

a n

o n

u B

o pe e

s i

t c

t n

a en s

s t

i l

Sa s

g l

s c

Pw n

R u

i o

o A

e la Ol c

S l

D C

EA n

F i

e e

e e

(

0 ij lf s

~

a e

h si l

il!

li l

ll!l I

g g

g I

~]

Design Bases Review-summary y

1 i;# ;M e On Schedule

e Identifying and Correcting Problems e Basic Design is Robu.st 32

~

O O

O

~

d ^

Technical Specification LCO Instrument r

Uncertainty Evaluation - Review r,

bra e Initial Licensing e Lack of Industry Program o Waterford 3 initiative e Basis identified and Documented e Initial Review Complete e Corrective Action is in progress 33

.O O

O'

/,

Technical Specification LCO Instrument r

Uncertainty Evaluation - Status

)

g e Initial Review Complete on all 309 Parameters e Additional research or reconstitution needed for 122 Open items u

u

~

O O'

~~

/

2' Technical Specification LCO Instrument

/"

Uncertainty Evaluation -Summary t

e System Functionality Supports Safe Operation -

Future TS Changes may be Required e Need to Complete Additional Research or Reconstitution e Goal is a Documented & Verified Basis for all TS Parameters e On Schedule to Support 3rd Quarter 1998 PIP Commitment as

h O

Cn Cc g

e as C

3 O

C Lij O

b y

O O

O

~~

A, Engineering - Recent Progress & Challenges t

L.

..?

e Design Bases Review and Technical Specifications LCO Instrument Uncertainty Evaluation e Engineering Request Program Conversion e Refuel 9 Modifications e Engineering & Technical Support Inspection e NRC Architect Engineer Inspection 37

O O

O~

j dj Engineering - Design Basis initiatives l

j l

x c

[d eDesign Bases Review eAOV Design Basis Reconstitution j

i eAssociated Circuits Analysis i

eCalculational Cross Reference Database elST Basis Reconstitution l

eSafety Analysis Design Bases Documents (DBD) i l

eComputer Hydraulic Models (CCW, EFW, ACCW, CHW) t I

eContainment Isolation Valve DBD i

eContainment Piping reanalysis / upgrade 38 l

{

i

d Engineering - Design Basis initiatives { Cont'd>

~

/

i 1

!Llbyf eGeneric Letter 96-01 implementation 4

m%

(*?

eRe-establishment of Containment Fan Coolers design requirements 1

~

eEmergency Feedwater Flow Design Basis reconstitution i

eEmergency Operating Procedure Parameters Basis development eGOTHIC Containment Analysis i

l eQ-List Verification i

l eTechnical Specifications LCO Instrument Uncertainty l

eTornado Missile Design Criteria 39

l o

o o~

l i

i Engineenng - 1997 Staffing g

j 175 g 150 -

140 l

m Design Engineering l

125 -

O Plant Engineering I

-*-Total Engineering 100 -

93 M

M 93 91 91 90 l

88 88 89 88 90 Jan.

Feb.

Mar.

Apr.

May Jun.

Jul.

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

]

40 3

v.

2 m.

,_m

~

O O

O~

Design Engineering Workload - 20 Months E::

=

:

om.

"; l"l """1.

.1

, e e

g

I l

l DE 41 1

l, l

l 2

4 79

/

O 2

1 75 1

1 79 g

f0 1

n

~

79 i

/9 re 75 e

8 n

75 i

7 g

7 n

5 6

E s

7 n

5 5

t o

ni 7

t 5

ac 4

A l

7 P

5 3

t O

d o

r 79

/

np 2

ae 79

/

,R 1

n g

6 n

'l 9

n

/2 go ir 1

e i

e 6

sit n

,li 9

/

i 1

i g

1 ed n

g E 6

Dn in

_l-n 9

/0 r

g 1

,o e

i e

s yC n

e 6

D l

9 i

/

g 9

t n &

e n

E y

6 i=

t t

9 f

e n

e

/

f 8

a ap a

lP S 6

SO O U i<

9

/7

~

~

~

~

OAgq,;;~

0 0

0 o

00 0

0 0

c 8

7 8

s 5

3e i

g g

g a

Design Engineering Backlog > 2 Years y uf

$f+..j p~. : p

,0 ECRs 80 --

70 --

60 --

10 --

0 I

I I

I I

I I

I I

i 3/97 4/97 5/97 6/97 7/97 8/97 9f97 10f97 11/97 12f97 i

l DE 43 i

1

q I

O O

"O 2

s O

g wO C

O C%

O O

1 5

gi, c

c C

E s'

o a.

.c e

Y

.5 O

e O

0)

C O

C O

'5 C

O g

O

'C O

O

>O C

C O

u (0

O

~

O

.C O

C 2-;

Q)

Cy)

O G) w N

O D

9.O Cw O,el L-

-,w u

w.

= ulki [ ~ h~

ib.-

i 1

t i

4 T

j d

lO i

4 i

I t

l l

l 2

O C

c m

=5 M

i G

h C

E

'O

- -G Lt C

LLI f

i l

D S~

Q'%

i 4

1. y":#7 i ;

f, p

2.m

,;y c

i p.. -.

. g..

Ll t;fy.k L....:

l l

I

.O O

O' O.i Engineering Overview

_- li e Direction e Performance e Design Basis Upgrades e Resources 46

_g

.~y_

-g

._m.-

e i

k i

g 4

O t

t I

t i

I i

t C

O_

i

)

_O o

e===

i l

(O C

i O

5 T

O 8

E a

l O

i b

I i

1 l

j i

i i

4 d

1 k

{

pv g---

.y_...

.'f

.s z.t ?, 4

&wa 4 ' J._..... l.. i... =

O l

1*- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ -., _ _., _ -. _ _ _ _. _. _. _.... _ _ _ _,, _, _. _ _ _.... _. _, _,.., _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _, _, _ _.

a a

Problem Killers-status Problem Not Fixed

[I linprovement, but more Work Not Completed if !!'J work to be done Problem Fixed -

Effectiveness Reviewed 24-I Problems Fixed Total items - 136

-E Problem Fixed - Effectiveness Reviewed e

t-T c~a p 13 Examples:

e RCS Head Vent Valves e Motor Generator set voltage regulator modification e "AB" Emergency Feedwater Drains e Main Feedwater Pump Oil e RCP 1B Baffle Bolts e Low Pressure Safety injection (LPSI) Voids l

49

/#

Improvement-More Work to be Done y

/

hjjf Examples:

e Setpoint change on Terry Turbine speed to avoid exceeding rated pressure e Leakage past seats on steam supply to Terry Turbine e Atmospheric Dump Valve (ADV) improvements e Shield Building Ventilation System (SVS) damper maintenance 50

O O

O

~~

~

/" }

Problems Not Fixed

/

b,]

4 e Condenser Air Evacuation System Instrument Probes e Condenser Air Evacuation System Performance o "B" Train Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)

Wattmeter e Containment Fire Detectors 51

1 1" '

Problem Resolution - Indications of Progress d

1 5

'y '- ;g L.

, T 55 5-fy/", 4;)

g: e '-

PW9.,

e Reductions in 1 a Unplanned LCO Entries i

+

i Adverse / Degraded Trends l

+

+ Overdue Corrective Actions i

l i

i i

i t

i 52 J

O O

O'-

f & Unplanned TS LCO Entries with Shutdown i

Requirements pg g

16 33 g$ h.

ir e N.

Month

~.

~-~..~ -~.---.-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

g 14 _

~

. -.. - ~... ~. ~ -.... ~

Target < 5/ month i

12 -

--- - -- - - - -- ~ ~ - -- - --- -

me

• f 1 Q -..y......................------....................--.....

cw 8

8 8

0 8-

---

7---

o J

6 m

6-

- - s- " -

st:

f_.-

---. 3 -.

2 g...

O o

0 0

i i

i i

i i

i i

i i

i i

Jan Mar May Jul Sep Nov Jan. '98 1997 Primary True North Goat:

Maintain Equipment in Top Notch Working Order S3

i"}

Unplanned LCO Entries Lgi e Recurring Problems Addressed

+ Containment Penetration for RCS Letdown

+ Wet Cooling Tower Level Instrument

+ Charging Pump Relief Valve Vent Line Leaks

+ Low Pressure Safety injection (LPSI) Voids e Recurring Problems with Outstanding Actions

+ Nitrogen Accumulator Regulating Valves

+ Safety Related Essential Chillers

+ Containment Fan Coolers (CFC) Flow Control Valves

+ jyg? igg ['~"

m. %

ffd%;. - m pi y

.M&P hy:1 i

es,-

MC f gy

1. Adverse Trends o

m 5

5 8

N 8

13 r

ae (M

C ee

< Jan 96 m

m z 5

l l

g h$

i.

Jan o o E8 Feb i

o

~

l

'O o

Mar o

s 8

mummes j

Apr o

i Q

May _

e Jun i

i I

Jul 9

(f) j j

o Aug.

i.

O o

Sep d

9 j

j Oct j

j o

Nov U

o O

Dec en W

N A

Jan "

o l

l Feb M

o Mar i

Apr May Jun E

A Jul c"1 Aug m

g Sep 3

Oct o

l Nov o

Dec o

e Jan '98 o

W m

9

O O

O

~_

d' Open De9 faded and Adverse Trends

2s i: 3 ['

70 -

ETotal Degraded Open 8 ~

OTotal Adverse Open 50 -

t*

40 -

a, 2

g 30 -

E 20 -

7,I,4 "76 cas'

,o _

e k

k b

b k

56 l

.O O

O' Adverse'/ Degraded Trends - Problems 7,

Addressed us:

x e COLSS failures e Inservice Inspection / Inservice Testing issues e FSAR discrepancies e Feedwater Pump reliability e Technical Specifications / Technical Requirements Manual recognition 57

~ _ _ _ _ _

i O

O.

O'

/1 COLSS Failures i

j 4

1

'9 l

3-

"3 g j

3d 5-4.5 -

1 t

4-oo. 3.5 -

e i

E 8

3-a E

2.5-O o

2-j o

i e

j 1.5 -

3 1-E l

'i 0.5 -

I j

0

?

c n.

c m-n,.

c e'

,c.

m 3

e e

3 o

e a

3 o

e o

m "3

E E

(/)

Z-7 E

E (f)

Z "3

E E

' (/)

Z 58 l

l

O O

O' i

"f '

Overdue Corrective Actions a

7-,_,

7 _

xm,

h

? Refuel Outage 8C j h

M in.

(4):

1F 2

1 3

-?005 7

-M]

{

700-y 4131

- a :, 1 E

!:562.-

~j 600-o j

94505l

$ 500-5 412

$ 400-5 g 300-O o

155

_= 200-83 s

61 100-47 19 0

Apr.

May Jun.

Jul.

Aug.

Sept.

Oct.

Nov.

Dec.

Jan.

'98 59

o o

l re Refuel Outage 9 Modification Scope

~ l' '

Ei a

li

"'kgy l

I of 22 Modifications Scoped 60

(l; Design Margin Recovery Modifications j

}

hpus s

E'"

e Safety Related SUPS Upgrade l

e EDG Fuel Oil Capacity e CCW valve modification to reduce pressure transients e RWSP purification system seismic upgrade e Replace EFW Terry) Turbine Drain Valve Motor Operator (AC to DC e Valve interlock on ACCW supply)to essential chiller (prevent water hammer potential e Condenser Off gas discharge modification (Restore ability use filtered exhaust) e Charging Line Containment Isolation Valve e CCW system: re-rate design pressure 61

.O O

O' l#'

Safety System Reliability Modifications r

y hb' l"

e Main Feedwater Isolation Valves (MFIV) oil contamination prevention e Filters for Nitrogen and Essential Air Regulators e Wet Cooling Tower Overspray e Containment Fan Coolers (CFC) Temperature Control Valves e Atmospheric Dump Valves e Low Pressure Safety injection (LPSI) shaft seal 62

.O O.

O' OtherModifications O

e Emergency Feedwater FCV Regulatory Guide 1.97 instrumentation o SDC vacuum priming system improvement e Containment Sump level transmitter e RCS Temperature Transmitters e BAM/PMU flow Totalizers e Main Turbine Turning Gear e Westinghouse Control Board Recorders

0 0

0'

~

.J -

Problem Resolution - Summary m

1

j i

'" S e Problem Killers from Refuel Outage 8 have I

been effective e Continuing to make steady progress in resolving problems e New challenges have emerged and are being addressed e Refuel Outage 9 Modification Scope identified for problem resolution n

L

t m

e, (D

O C

.O_

Co

~3 O

. _o

<:t C

O O

COQ.

O O

mEb,, % ; ; -em.. '

!ff)',,i. ' ~. '..

f

~'

~

.v-

.a2,:;wi&Q1::%'a.,..,.::,'. :; i'.- i-

g O

N T

C C

3

.O_ yo

.N_

Mg m

C w

CD t5 O.

o ac GE

[t C

m O

o.

~@. _ a)

CO O

O

'N A,

l'?- 7 'f75",77f,;J 4,gy/

g);

b h:f h

$ff, ; : '..

w p ; eay.:...

j ;JtQy*yl; ;'.__

g

..,.;. asaw a :. :: -

~

O O

O' l

4, Condition Report Initiation Rate-r perations u

kgyk fRefuelOutage Sj 100 0 Non-Significant CRs

[6 * 'C^s 2f d

90 -- s Significant CRs g"e. j jg; q

~ ~'

g; r

L4 g

80 u

n -

"~ ' # ' ~

)

," ff y_

70

_ f pi -

t& -

'a-y 60 i

- -- n_

k 4

50 p

D a.

-a

~

p I

W Jr as 1

[, ' '

^3 j-.

4 g

A L

40 --

li C

3 70 60 E

j%

J j

66 56 50

" 51 h

e C

l 30 --

49 52

+3

{%

j 32l 47 y

1 43 4

32":

M a

3, ac 20 --

p 3

3 4

l l b8 ph

[2' N$

I4 10 --

e b

.^. _

g:

q f M,_ m EM _,_

m,_ M M,_M,

0-E,E,"rM E[

e s

s s

s s

s s

s s

s s

s e

.E

.m

.m

.m

.m

.m

.m

.m

.m

.m E

i d

i n

a a

y d

f 6

a i

6 d

O" o

=

s o

o z

O 7

w 2

4 2

7 m

z o

67

- o o

o-l 4^/p Condition Report Initiation Rate -

/

Maintenance hk g

ef

[6,

?.y;..i R$G m.

f]

[ Refuel Outage'8fj Non-Significant CRs E-JO; 7

100

~

go -- 5 S.ignif.icant CRs (r

7 1-

j "g.

80 n

.y - 3 y

g-70 7

W 4

g i

, :d p

.4 g.

e

~

g i

1

[:

5

(

gg

]!

g 50 g4

~l F

40 N

2 as

-I l

3 se w

30 --

n e

s g

9 i '~

20

^

W 35 N.

32 36 h

[

2g q

30 y

10 --

~

~

~

27 b

t i

[

iG i

0 o

e e

~

.s

~

s s

s s

s s

s s

s x

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

^D i

u a

.d a

d cL i

u a

O S

S 8

2 E

i 5

5 5

S S

5 68 L - - - ---

)

O O

O' i

Eg

/

J Condition Report Initiation Rate -

m J

Systems Engineering m

L h J. _m..:.h'. ', ' 'l

mmrmnn. -;

f' ': - ^=%;t g;v yRefbelOntageSq M

100 Non-Si9nificant CRs V_. 4 % ~ 5 ' 1,

~

'd Significant CRs M,M t'A,;

w m

80 s

.a af

('y..;

e;;y, - ' e 3;o s e :u e

70

.j

s. "# r ;;,

w g ; pj;.l

~

."R l:y:l yl3 60

._a sw

,e a

h? ;

<Q.

+N

,A

, lf.

N.'#

y l1

$5!". -

ly__.

mf^?

" ~

?

40

. ja 30 g

gm

- _j y

"}~

jj f-

• q 20 -

9 33 7

.d f:

4 8"

25 so as

[

E+ 29 28 q

p

-T: ".

"3 10 -

to 9II 16 11 g

13 t

v

~

11 p

a

a 0

e e

e

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

.~

~

~

x

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

• G i

u d

n i

a W

d

-i cL i

u d

~

69

o o

o-1 Jl Condition Renort Initiation Rate -

a r

'/

Des.ign Engineenng s

p.. _

5:"::+hk -

. - _ = +

n.7 =. n....

?*9[

[ Refuel Ostage'83, 4

y

.y 100 --

i-Non-Significant CRs y 7: Mgr y

• ~

Si nificant CRs R:.

5 9

g.s 80 L

y

'i n

m 4

m:.

?:.~'m y

mw 70 p ~ 3,f ~

~

q y : --

3-

q 60 y

' M M il

?l:

50 y

.f

~~ -~

j r3 g _ g - w :,p.., ~ q;g

$g. - /, -:'

7, 0

g,

.3 3m y a un w.v: g /:~ _ n -4 L

 ;:73

37,,

gy_

30 r_

_,9 g c.esg2-7 g5 pr e; m

s 20 g

d-kz.

~--

~9 10 -- 13 13 13 12 14 R ','

7 p:

(

y._'[

15 10

?))

T e

a c

7

[7]

O o

~

~

~

~~s s

s s

s s

s ac

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

5 N

5 2l i

5

~$

N-d 5

o z

6 5

=E

E

=

3 4

J3 i

f 6

4

~

1 70

l Condition Report Initiation Rate-r Quality Assurance j

t.

t -

l

..AC

7 - %;

E l7C gRefuel Ontage'8s i

100

- 4 ; J.

m Significant CRs

[g %

90 - o Non-Significant CRs R

tip, -

94]

7em g;,

y re-

~ & mQ R G~ ML q

70

~b~

.J W

m.

(A (E; c g[ [

,}j n

60 k.

g p2 f"T:s;Dfj[ ~ k7 ~ q)

)

50 i--

P

~

f k~-

^'.'

es

~

j.i,-dk h';ft- "

..;.r.

~~

40 4

['-

' d-

.c

'~"..

4}.

30 g - g

3 mum

~

PJ -

~

w:

q 6 N; tr.z uma

~;

T 20 S[e b_'

fd 32 1

N #

19 10 --

20 21 19 15 16 E is 14 o

m, E

,R.R.M.

.l 0

e e

e

~

s s

s s

s s

s s

~

s

~

m I

t r

r r

?

.e r

r

?

.e

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

i u

d

.d a

d

-i e

i a

d 71

O O

O~

J 4 5 Condition Report Initiation Rate -

Quality Assurance vs. Other Organizations r

E Mej RMQT!]

[

19 74

' fSj E Total CRs - Other p

?;

Orgs.

~

DTotal CRs - QA lll 250 -

y 200 -

)

1 150 -

1 7

100 -

a 50 -

7 0

Oct '96 Dec. '96 Feb. '97 Apr. '97 Jun. '97 Aug. '97 Oct. '97 Dec. '97 72

~

CR's identified By j

1 400 350 -

m 300 -

222 218 2,,

is4 j

150 -

'36 tai m

3-i i

i i

i i

i i

i 8-i i

i i

i t

0 Sep-96

'ov-96 Jan-97 Mar-97 May-97 Jul-97 Sep-97 Nov-97 Jan-98 Month / Year aNRCIESREW31

E E0/H

~N ' E to/Br n M ?!/ zi,

+L. E II/ti.

n :M ot, tc,

+ ;,E r,o/;(.

n -M 80/zf-w Lol 6 lE O

N' 90,Ili.

9

_o e

E

~

Ea

'n M gojii,

. rolti.

fvlLi,

{U; if E il/ sit.

N "n M ti/%

o i c e, >

nMrw%

h 52 cn m

s e

m n

n c,

so joJaqwnN

?

O m

.C Q

CU w0 m

CO w

e F-O M

w D

<C 9 ~~.,

,N c r 7>i;: ;

gn.,

y

,}

'o,.',

b

,p>

.y.

-.+&21

1

.;..L Q 77='?;r s

,py e

k O

ic.0A L a, C-

,1 4.

p;.y

-g Number of Condition Reports o

a ro ca a

m m

u i

I t

t I

I I

Jan-95 m

~

U Mar-95 j

~

May-95,

Jul-95 ~

O Sep-95 [ usumum U

Nov-95 "

D Jan-96 '

m o

r==>

Mar-96 '

3 h

May-96 "

unusumunnmuuuumuus

, - m Jul-96 [

{

m W

Sep-96,

g a

~

Nov-96 Jan 97.

O g

q

~

Mar 97

~

May-97 ~

c:t'.

Jul-97 ~

U Sep-97 Nov g M

a

'l a gs. '.:,

g,;

+:7 j

4)

1.f,.

i ig 7

ic i.8

'- Am..

Number of Condition Reports

-M o

N a

m m

0 t

i I

e i

i I

t den-95 t

"y b

Mar 95 uma uma May 95,

2 Jul 95 ~

Sep 95,

O 9

Nov-95 ~

O D

ume Jan 96 '

M

~

U Mar 96 'emm O.

May 96 -

O y

muume Jul-96 ~

~

Sep-96,

unummuunus Nov 96 [muummuuuuuummum nu m u sumuse Jan 97 [ummuuuuuuuuuuun nu

- mums Mar 97 [-

muumuu May 97 [ mus mumus Jul 97 [ ummmu

~

Sep 97,upu unu Nov 97 [

u

ykyrg"~

, 4 i

r.m 2,:r i:.w.

.m.-

s kJ.w:2

~

b M

Number of Condition Reports o

w a

e cm o

w a

e i

t i

i I

I I

I Jan-95 t

]

Mar 95 muu uma May 95 '_

2 Jul-95 ~

Sep-95,

C) 9 Nov 95 ~

O D

mu Jan 96 ~

O

~

D

~

O.

Mar 96 _ume O

May 96 _

muuus Jul 96 ~

numumums Sep 96 ~

ummuummunu Nov 96 ~ mmuummmmmuumu um Jan 97 ~ ummuummuuuuuma su unum Mar-97 ~

mumme May 97 [ mun Jul 97 ~

l museus l

~

1 1

~

Sep 97,muu muu Nov 97 [

~.. _

^

~

am 45ue m WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN STATUS True North Goal:

1. Operate Waterford 3 Safely cass so ow.

Acton Strategy: A - Achieve exce!!ence in human performance Sponsor: T.R. Leonard A24067 Closed l R3GS7 Strengt5sn the observat on of plant evolutons. work.~:trviEes and trak m 9by managers 1

A24063 Closed }

S'3G'97 2 Promote the use of the Waterford 3 Taralces P: ice es n

A24064 C:cM j 973G97 3 Hold qua t-Hy Rimm Performance Awareness days A24065 Wcrbrg 6,*3G93 4 Trad put workers in numan error reducton ic-J <.4aes A24066 Wu k 9 SGG98 5 Imp!ement irr*provements in hands on practical tranwng A24067 l Closed l 123157 6 increase supervtser presence in the field Strategy: B - improve safety Culture Sponsor: E.C. Ewing A24068 l C:vsed i S3G97

_ Establish penode intor : m,<nw m.e,w is of regulatory issues at all hands mod.rgs 1

A24069 [

CM=md j 9'3G97 2 Estab5sh penode extemal commui a Luns of regulatory issues with NRC A24070 Closed l 613G97 3 Reinforce need for questaim g attitude and encourage fixing pivi-Aems A24071 C:esed 12!31/97 Conduct regulatory sensitisnty and ki v,sidge trak s g for selected g oups 4

A24072 CM 6GG97 5 Rewund v.mnptly to employee w was and questions A24073 l Closed j 9/3G97 di Assess correctrve action vogram eMectiveness and yvcess A24074 l Closed } 12f31/97 7 Perform safety culture assessmed Strategy: C - Improve teamwork and communications Sponsor: EC. Ewing A24076 l C:vs d l 12/31197 1 Conduct team-bu,1dmg at Wate 'v,d 3 serwor m..+., sat ' ;;'

A24077 } Cl w l 12/31/97 2 implement communicaton imysvements, both intemal and extemal A24078 l Closed i 12/31/97 3 instatt Emergency Planneng communication hurv. i,ents A24079 ) CM i 12!3157 4 increase orgacuational focus on quahty and safety A24080 i Closed i 12/31/97 5 Improve managerrentigeassroots cu. oo rarvcatons interface Strategy: D - Operate within and improve the understanding of the Design and Licensing bases Sponsor: AJV/ rape A24230 Workrg S3G98 Concact wa r ng on des,gn and I.censtng basis for Operations Maa ow.-e. Uw.29 and E,y,i-y pw w s.e:.

A24085 l CbM l 12/31/97 1

2 Pedorm an eec iveness assessment of the revised 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluatien puce.ss

(

)

M WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN S TATUS Ew< sana True North Goal:

1. Operate Waterford 3 Safely Cats ID States Due Acum 3 Submit a fuD convers>on to the new Combuston Eivi w <rg (CE) Standa-d Tedrucal Spec 5cabons (STS) (NUREG-1432)

A24086 Wortung 600S8 4 Reven selected sectons of the UFSAR for accuracy and wiiAto ess A24087 Weriting 12/31 S 9 5 Complete discovery phase of the Design Bases Revew Program for the risk 6, Jrc

,1 freJ = a sysiens A24088 Wcriurg 33t193 l 6 Complete discovery phase of the Design Bases Review Program for the balance of the selected ir+2eh systems A24089 Wortung 3731/99 7 Complete the upgrade of mechanical calculatons ident. Sed as unsatisfactory in the discovery phase :J the Design Bases Review Program A24090 Wodong 12/1599 l I

1 Develop Safety System Functional inspection Ahisa Plan A24091 i Closed j 9:3397 A24092 Wortung 6TJG98 9 Upgrade design aM testrng bases for selected areas

(3,.

'x J 24wcsa rrew WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN STATUS True North Goal:

2. Maintain Equipment in Top Notch Working Order cus so st.sw.

o Acekm Strategy: A - Develop an effective work control process Sponsor: S.G.Bruner A24097 I C*M l S30W 1 Establish Work Week M wp e

• Closed i a'3397 A24098 2 Imp;sment 12 r.=h rolleng sd,c,dak re ss A24099 l C*M i SOGW 3 Improve pre-job 6'o qs A24100 i C3es+d 6.3G98 Implement Preventive Ma:rr.ww s Program angc.e.- eats to ensure abgnment with 12.. ~t work WWule 4

Strategy: B - Improve quality of work and testing Sponsor: JR.Douet Closed j 1713t197 A24104 [

1 Complete planned activities in the IST program Submit updated plan for second 10-year i e af. Resolve.... g4 def:crwss c pedidously.

A24105 Sd.eduled E3098 2 Pe %rrn self-assessment of maintenance work quaidy and implement improvements A24106 Wwkiq 33tr4 3 F -Iwin assessment of the Motor Operated Valve (MOV) Program and implemerd imgc =i,s--4s A24tG7 SdWaled 3<31/98 4 Pm fw u. assessment of the M Operated Valve (AOV) Picy o n and implement improvements A24108 Wwksg 3*31,98 5 Pmfwin assessment of the Check Valve (CV) F% fem and inni.a4 auro ea-e-4s A24109 Workmg 9/3G58 6 Assess predictrve maintenance and implement i-n.-.dstons

,3 t

V p

WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN STATUS nmswm True Nonh Goal:

3. We Should Find Our Own Problems cus to semen.

o Acnon Strategy: A - Conduct thorough and comprehensive Root Cause Analyses Sponsor: E.C.Evdng A24112 Working 3.31/98 1 Assess the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) prrww and implemerit changes as necessary to improve the process Strategy: B - Continue to aggressively identify plant problems Sponsor: E.C. Ewing A24116 { Cks. d j 1201/97 1 Assess the Condition Report process implement changes and train personnel to improve process ef%cbveness A24117 YMn;g 3/31/98 2 Assess the process for identification of adverse trends Strategy: C - Measure critical parameters to aggressively identify equiproent problem areas Sponsor: D.W.Vinci 1 Establish roles, responsibiisties and accountabilities for evaluatog equipment trend information and forwarding the results to lHEA for A24118 { Closed { 12/31/97 inclusion into the Global Trend System Strategy: D - Upgrade the effectiveness of audit and assessment programs Sponsor: F.J.Drummond 8

A24119 i Closed I

&~3G'97 Rede ine ar.d remforce management expectations for the po.fvinwe of the Quakty Assurance (QA) organiza$on 1

2 Conduct an as-sit of the QA organization Evaluate its effectiveness, incidng an evaluation of tedivcal expertise and capabi!ities.

A24110 i Closed l 12/31/97 Implement the assessment rwnn.codations.

A24121 i Cbwd !

90G"97 3 Deve!op guidelines and implement a sitewide asssssment oversight process A24122 Cbwd l 9/3GV7 An it' dependent corporate assessment team, le d by the Chief Operating Of'icer, will conduct an assessment to evaluate plant >Imows 4

as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of Waterford 3 and Corporate ewT.ents l

i i

i

% WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN STATUS zus < 5a2s ev True North Goal:

4. Expeditiously Fix Problems Once Actum cus so se a o

Strategy: A - Improve engineering process, including station change processes Sponsor-A.J.Wrape / D.W.VinCi 1 Implement a sate-vnde Engmeenng Requert (ER) Process A24123 Woriu+g 3 31S8 2 Conduct a self-assessment of the Waterford 3 Operatog Expenences Evaluation (OEE) process to address e 5 cent (sew.i, of indust v A24124 l Closed l 12!3157 a

cxperience and interface with other processes 3 Improve project management and prontization processes A24125 } Closed i 1231/97 Strntegy: B - Resolve long-standing issues Sponsor: A.J.Wrape / D.W.Vinci 1 Establish targets and reduce backlog to manageable lenrels A24129 Woriorg 3/31!98 2 Develop a " Top 10" Ec.ipment Problem List A24130 l Closed ;

9/~tG97 3 Implement Technical Specfcation change to resolve Condensate Storage Poof vortexmg issue A24131 i Closed J 70G97 4 Imp!ement Technical Speofication change for Reactor Coolant System URCS) boron cis,caob oton kmer Irmit A24132 i Closed ! 6!3G97 5 Implement Technical Speoficaten change for use of Wet Cooling Tower basins for Emergency Feedwater (EFW)

A24133 { Closeo 70G97 6 !mplement Technical Speofcaton change for Containment Fen Cooiers A24134 l Closed 713G97 7 !mp!ement Technical Epeoficaten change for Tnsodium Phosphato surveillance A24135 } Closed ; 6cG97 8 Implement Technical Specifcaton change for Containment Vacuurn Reiief penetrations A24136 l Closed 6!3G97 9 Implement Technical Specification :hange for Cycle independent Shape Annealog Matrix (CISAM)/ Core Protecten Calculator (CPC) power A24137 j Ch> sed 6GG97 cal:braton 10 Implement Techrwcal Specfcation change for Low Pressure Safety Irgection (LPSI) ventmg surveillance A24138 { Closed l 6/30/97 11 Implement mod:Scation to ehminate need for -4* etevaton. Reactor Atmliary Building entry to close Cv.nyv..c,,t CooEng Water (CCW)

A24139 ! Closed i 7/3G97 contarnment isoiation valves 12 implement moc f.caton to resolve; Auxiliary CCW system dernenoes A24140 I Closed l 700S7 13 Replace Emergency Desel Generator (EDG) synchronization swtch A24141 Closed j 6/30S 7 14 Replace fa ed channels of Vaive and Loose Parts Monitoring System A24142 Cicsed 6/3G97 15 Reptace fas*e vs for targeted MOVs A24143 Closed 6/30.97 16 Insta!! add tionaf vents on LPSLMgh Pressure Safety injecbon (HPSI) contamment penetraten high points A24144 j Closed 6/3G97 17 Imo:ement modicaton to resolve Containment Vacuum Rehef instrument line boundary A24145 l Closed [ 7/3G97 18 Implement moc fication to enstall additonal Safety injection (SI) Sump Trisodrum Phosphate baskets A24146 I Closed l 6/3G97 19 Reposition PSI onf.ce A24147 l Closed 6/3G97 20 implement modi 5ca' ion to relocate Refueling Water Storage Poc* level instrument vents A24148 i Closed 7.7G97 21 Adjust blowdewn nng setrings for remaining Crosby relef valves A24149 { Closed l 6/30/97

(

e

A

]

g e

maosara m WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN STATUS Truo North Goal:

4. Expeditiously Fix Problems Once Cats ID Status Due Action A24150 l Closed j 7/3G97 22 Implement modif+n to add additronal steam traps and drains on EFW System A24151 l Cies+d 7/3G97 23 Implement modWan to slow stroke time for selected CCW valves A24152 I Closed 60G97 24 Implement modi 6caton to enhance monitanng of 6.9ky bus transfer circuty A24153 l Closed 70097 23 Test remote safe sheha panel (LCP-43)

A24154 ! Ctes+d 613G97 26 Test Wet Cooling Tower Basin cross-connect line A24155 i Closed 7/3G97 27 Ensure that requirements of Ge et 1.et*er (GL) 96-01 are implemented A24156 l Closed { 7/3G97 20 Pedunn testing of targeted valves to confirm the adequacy of accumulators A24157 i Civsed j 7GG97 29 Resolve 9eactor Coolant Pump (RCP) fill oil line issues reta'ed to 10CM50 Appendix R A24158 l Ciesed i 7!3G97 30 Resolve Post AcxJdent Sampling System (PASS)ww;io,n.= %e A24159 i C esed l GGG97 31 Resolve Ultimate Heat Sink desagn basis issues A24160 WuM14 12/31/98 32 Implement modi 5 cation to resolve RCS Resistance Temperature Detector (RTD) cable groundrng problems & hot leg RTD seal e;TA.. /J quahficaten i+fe issues A24161 Wortung 12f3t98 33 Implement modi 5caton to red _ra Wet Coofing Tower overspray A24162 Working 1201/98 34 Implement modi 5 cation to resolve the fuel oil storage capacity issue for the Emergency Diesel Generators (EDGs)

A24163 Working 120t98 35 Imptement modification to change the vatve opera +or/ power supply on MS-407 (Emergency Feedwater (EFW) steam hne e i+ w w.y drain valve) to Derect Current (D/C)

A24164 Sd+14ed 90G98 36 Implement modificaten to provide bsckup cooling water supnfy to the Primary Sampling System A2416S Sc.1+1uled 9GG98 37 Implemer:t modification to provide backup cooling water wnnly to the Secondary Samphng System A24166 Working S3G98 30 tmplement mod:ficaten to erhance secunty fighting A24167 Wu brq 120t98 39 Implement mod.ficaten to add remote manual operating capabihty for containment isolation va!ve CVC-209 A24168 j Closed j 7GG97 40 Implement modif.caton to provide EFW Heat Trace Reliability imgc,ve; ents

~

A24169 Working S*3G98 41 Implement modi 6 cation to replace Broad Range Toxic Gas Monitor A24170 W wbus 93G98 42 implement modifcanon to provide CCW design pressure re+ ate A24401 W w;w g 3/3t99 44 implement modi 6cahon to reduce CCW hydraulic transients to below system design pressure

~

r 6

rx/

4 WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN STATUS am esan ew True North Goal:

9. Procedums Are to be Simple, Clear, Correct and Followed CatSID Staess Due A

Strategy: A - Improve procedure compliance Sponsor: C.M.Dugger A24216 l M i 1201/97 1 Cw 4+te Root Cause Analysis (RCA) on procedure compIiance and identfy correctrve N Strategy: 8 - Improve procedure process and upgrade procedures Sponsor: F.J.Drummond A24217 l O-: ;+d j 12/31/97 Revise procedure W4.101," Operability /Quairfcation Confirmation Process" to amprove the guedance on tituig for evaluab A the role of 1

engir%ts superv&L and interacton with shift sw-

.6, A24229 i Closed i 9GGS7 2 Implement the Waterfwd 3 Procedure improvement Irwtrative to streamhne and enhance the procedure vuc.=ss A24218 Worbng 301"38 3 Complete a comprehensrve sitewide assessment of d=g L,o d.; procedure impicivo. - t actnnbes and develop a long term w L.aous g,.More impic.6,1 era plan A242f?

Working 60GS8 Revise the Emergency Opera 5cn Procedures (EOPs) to irt:orporate revised CEN-152 h e ds 4

u_

n

.~

v)

\\

ansessa m

-ji WATERFORD 3 PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLAN STATUS True North Goal: 10. Make Waterforti3 the Cleanest Station in the Country cms so st i Aeson Strategy: A - Improve housekeeping, material conddion and site appearance Sponsor: R.F.Burski A24220 Workrrg 12.3t?C2 1 Cwi Ate the Site Appear.(o Plan A24221 Workarg 12/31/98 2 Improve +xss to plant equb.,ent and reduce long-term wN 'i rg A24222 j CLW j 9.3G97 3 Perform Zone inspechens and assign accountabHdy for plant appearance

-.