ML20199F644
| ML20199F644 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 11/04/1983 |
| From: | Mattson R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Fremling A ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20151K563 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-FIN-B-2539, FOIA-86-78 NUDOCS 8604080392 | |
| Download: ML20199F644 (16) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- .. - . - -- .. ... _ .c. - ., .... .. . - =- .- .-. 7 - . - - - - - r. n 7m W
,.3
&,7{,=, . .
Y&N 55 5j A&[/ a 1 y d I 4 j Pr. A. G. Frealing, Manager
~
; Richland Operations Office NOVO 41983 1 U. S. Department of Energy j P. O. Box 550
, Richland, Washington 99352
Dear Fr. Fremling:
t
Subject:
Pf!L Technical Assistance to the Division of Systens Integrd.fon NRR, NRC " Fuel Operating Experience Evaluation V" (fit @ i This letter is a request for a proposal from Battelle Pacific Northwest 1 Laboratories (PNL) to provide technical assistance to the Division of Systens Integration, NRC. The Statement of Work in Enclosure 1 details the required work and should be used as the basis for preparing a proposal 3
; for sutnission to this office.
q
'i Standard tems and conditions for NRC work, as provided in the DOE /HRC J Pecorandum of Understanding of February 24, 1978, and described in NRC Panual Chapter 1102, should be used as the basis for preparing a proposal, If a portion of this work is to be subcontracted, it is required that PNL have a professional assigned to the contract who is qualified to defend the o resul ts. Also, prior approval by me in writing is re:;uired before initia-tion of any subcontractor effort. Please sulnit a proposal containing, as a minimun, the infomation set forth in Enclosure 2 Proposal Content, in the format of the Statement of Work within 30 days to:
{ Mrs. Sybil Boyd j Program Assistant to the Director, P-1102 Division of Systens Integration Office of Nuclear Paactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Work under this program is not anticipated to be classified, but it will
- concern proprietary infomation that is provided in vendor topical reports and other correspondence and should be handled in accordance with the Rules of Practice 10 CFR 2.790.
P n This request for proposal is not an authorization to start work. Authori-zation to cocr:ence work becomes effective upon Richland Operations Office acceptance of an appropriately executed NRC Fom 173, Standard Order for DOE Work.
~
- b' m-MP, 001
*yife *#$a ........ ..................... ..................... .............. .. .
ruwaur) ..... ............ ... .... ..................... ..................... .................... .................... .................... CATEk ................. .................... ..................... .................... .................. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..................
"": m" 3'8 "o'8o> Nacu 024o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY * "5- 'o 2'8 3-do .24:
2~m%QM;-W l'MW~~~f^:. Y L?* L*. * '=2N2%=WMAT
g. i 1~ .
'7 pO,,e we AOa? W
[ X' - . ,- , M. =";a _-- wy . a4 mw amer mm .a..,
'A. G. Frenling NOV0 41983 -j If you have any cuestions about this request, please contact firs. S. Boyd at -. FTS 492-7685. Thank you for your assistance.
J
] Sincerely, iq Origfnc! sigoc-d by Roger J. Mattson Roger J. f'attson, Director o Division of Systems Integration Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation v,
L
Enclosures:
e 1. Statement of Work
- 2. Proposal Content A
cc: R. Barber HQ-DOE M. Freshley, PflL W. Bailey, PHL
. J. Praino, PNL Richland 1 P. Sherfy, PNL M. J. Plahuta, DOE Richland c
fi 4
;4 d . ~1 j R. MATTSON j S. B0YD L. RUBENSTEIN C. BERLINGER e R. MEYER M. TOKAR L V. ZEOLI, DRM D. DAND0IS, DRM Z. ROSZTOCZY, DST f
u
%f f
4I .3n ow l _ i -
.. s.,
)
~
omery . . . . . . . C P. .B ..:.D. .S. .B.
. C. .P. I. ...:.D. .S. I.:. 8 ..
S.L. . . C. . . .A. D. :. .C. P. ....
.S. .:... . ig
..s.. . .
.. \. . . . . .r... ....
RMEYER CBERLINGER LR CUINAME) ....MT0 KAR:l .....................
............... s ................ .... . ... .U B E NSTE.
.......... * *IN...
* * .S.
** *B.O . D. . .BG..r.e.
. . . . . . .~. e.
. RM .h. t. .s. .o.
. n.iTs' . ....
our) . . . . ./. . ./. . . .../.. . 8. ./. 9 9 3 . .L. . . . ./.
. . .8.9.3./. . y. . . ./. 8 3 . . 9./. . .( . . . /.89./.
. ... . . . . 3. . . .).7.
. . . . /.8. Q...
- 3. . . . . .8.......
1
./.~.). . ./.8. 3.
- 0. .(1 N2C FORM 3te HO/80mRCM O240 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY
- u.s. opo ms-4eo.24
.m.....,.._..,.
..,.,,,_.,,..m...,..__.,,,..,,,....
u - mr;_.. ___m ~~~m:.~.--~-
- m. e .:-. - - _,. , ,,
i i,l .%,. A O y Ov Y H
. -?-
If you ' ave any cuestions about this recuest, please contact f'rs. S. C ,d at FT5 492- V5. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely,
. Roger J. l'attson4 Cirector Division of Systens Integration Office of N clear Peactor Regulation ..'t
[
Enclosures:
U 1. Statenent of 1lork
) 2. Proposal Content cc: R. Barber, lin-00E ft. Freshley, PNL If. Bailey, P?!L G. Turner, COE Pichland f DISTRIBUTION:
NRR OFFICIAL PR JECT FILE (B. GRENIER) CPB:rf R. MATTSON S. BOYD g L. RUBENST IN
't C. BERLI ER R. MEYE M. TOK V. ZE I, CON D. D ND0IS, CON I. Z. OSZTOCZY I ) ,
a I l .
+
n Aw . h'-! CFFICE) . ..C. .P. .B. . .:.D.
. C..P..B.:..DS
. S..I.. ... ...
. . . . . . . . . . ICPB:DSI:BC
. .:. .SE......
AD: CPS:DSI
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......g..,,.......
DSI DSI:DIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MTOKAR:Is RMEYER C LRuotnSTE N ...S 55 Y.D......... ..... ........'f.......... RJMA TSON 1 sunnAus) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .BERLINGER
, ATE) ..8./.1.. 7.../. 8. ..3....
. 8./....J...I...../.8....8./......
. . 3.. 183... . 8 /...........A.
8 3 . ../..... ..../ 8 3 8/ /83
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........\.............
,s NRC FORM 318 (10-80) NRCM 024o OFFIClAL RECORD COPY usam ad;.sn*a YI
~
_ _ _ _ , _ _=. __:_L -
' YD AV * - -
. __ a . ~ . a __ ..____.___.e ___
i - O . O 1 ' ENCLOSURE 1 STATEMENT OF WORK 1
Title:
Fuel Operating Experience Evaluation Program V
] FIN No.: 82539 i B&R No . : 20-19-50-54-3 Project Manager: Marvin S. Dunenfeld (FTS 492-8097) dI ,
i j Backaround The Reactor Fuels Section issued its first annual report on U. S. commercial l j reactor fuel performance for the year 1978. Since 1979, the reports have 4 j been prepared in cooperation with Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories. { The reports deal mainly with the status of observed problem areas and fuel i* surveillance and lead-testing-assembly programs. The reports provide useful j insights on operational perfomance and design trends. ~ . Objective .j The objective of this work is to evaluate fuel operating perfomance for the j calendar year and to obtain assistance in the preparation of a report ]j summarizing that perfomance and related surveillance and extended burnup programs. This annual report will be used by the staff in the analysis of
] damage trends and design effects.
I - Work Reouirements In carrying out the following tasks, the contractor will work closely with 3.q; NRC Reactor Fuels Section staff, who will provide some of the perfomance
,! infomation, and data, but the contractor will be expected to obtain data ;j also from independent sources, including the open literature, for calendar 3 year 1983.
W .i
*m-' e* a rmee w. _ut- _are e rw_me wr e."rer'~ ** "* + - ;_ e **=-mn,*. m % y .. .%. .
._5 , ga m
- ._~^
^
=, w. L. ..
- J.
N'- * ..I l i TASK 1 - Obtain and Collate Data { Estimated Level of Effort: 1 man-month Projected Completion Date: June 30, 1984 l Obtain and collate LWR fuel operating data provided in LERs, surveillance reports, vendor topicals, etc. = ~.; Projected Comoletion Date
] Milestone Submittal of descriptive list of all June 30, 1984
] j collated material. ') . 1 TASK 2 - Review and Analize Data Estimated L'evel of Effort: 1 man-month Projected Completion Date: August 30, 1984 i j Review and analyze operating data for tiends and similarities, and ) evaluate vendor-recommended remedies fyr observed fuel damage episodes. T Milestone ; Projected Completion Date , b Submittal of a summary of all analyse ( August 30, 1984 . and evaluations. !
.4 . :
9 . 1 TASK 3 - Prepare Reporb *
; s .2 .- . .w -
c-1 Estimated Level of Effort: 'l mlh-mon 2
) Projected Completion Date: November 15, 1984 J Prepare a NUREG/CR report dealing with fuel operating perfomance and related surveillance programs for the calendar year.
Milestones Projected Com;i tion Dates f' 1. Issuance of draf) NUREG/Ci report October 30, 1984 for NRC review. ,' , I
,, 2. Issuance of fina,i NUREG/CR report. November 30, 1984
- j
.i
^
~
q a f) .l ' e . - - - . _
- - - w- -
. a . =. - __ . = - . - _ . . .
q o a. 1 O 3 j
)* (c) Problem Areas Observed During 1983 - This section should contain j brief descriptions of the fuel damage incidents encountered during
. 1983, including causes, remedies and actions taken by the NRC, licensees 1 and vendors.
,3 j (d) Fuel Design Changes and Surveillance Programs - This section M should include a description of the vendors' fuel design changes
% and associated lead test assembly, demonstration irradiation, an'd fuel testing programs. A tabular listing of each vendor's type of
'4 fuel, number of assemblies being tested, location, current and N target burnups, and s'cheduled completion date should be provided.
k (e) Summary of High-Burnup Fuel Experience - This section should summarize each vendors' high burnup experience for the calendar year to the extent that the infonnation is available. Preferably, each h vendor will submit a summary of their fuel assembly batch-averaged . 7 burnup that can be used for input to this section. - i -
. (f) List of Generic Actions Taken by NRC Fuel Section - In this g section there should be a listing of the generic action items under-1 taken by NRC's Reactor Fuels Section. The list should contain a (1) the subject (e.g., PWR Rod Bowing), (2) the memorandun (author, title, date), that addresses the subject, and (3) a one-sentence description of the significance of the action.
i Business Letter Report j A monthly business letter report will be submitted by the 20th of the month H to the-Reactor Fuels Section Leader with copies provided to the Project Manager, the Director, Division of Systems Integration (ATTN: Sybil Boyd), < L. S. Rubenstein, DSI and Mr. B. L. Grenier, NRR. These reports will g identify the title of the project, the FIN, the Principal Investigator, the period of performance and the reporting period and will contain two sections as follows: d
.g .
_. --._-~_ _ _..._ .-. _ . _.
-. - - . . . . . . . . - - . . . .- - . - . = . . . - .
j- . . b O ] i
. 1. Project Status Section
- a. A listing of the efforts completed during the period; milestones reached, or if missed, an explanation provided.
~~
_,! b. Any problems or delays encountered or anticipated and recommendations j for resolution. I lj c. A summary of progress to date (this may be expressed in terms of percentage completion for each task). q . 4 d. Plans for the next reporting period. I 2. Financial Status Section
- a. Provide the total cost (value) of the project as refle,cted in the proposal 4
(NRC Fom 189), the total amount of funds obligated to date, and the J balance of funds required to complete the work by fiscal year as follows: A - 4 Total Funds Balance of Funds b Projected Obligated By Fiscal Year "t Project Cost To Date FY- FY- FY-4 )q b. Provide the total direct staff use and amount of funds expended (costed) 3 during the period and total cumulative to date in the following categories: m t 1
;l If the recommended resolution involves a contract modification, i.e.,
4 j change in work requirements, level of effort (costs) or period of perfomance, a separate letter should be prepared and submitted to the Director, Division of Systems Integration (ATTN: S.M.Boyd);anda copy provided to the Project Manager and B. L. Grenier.
- )
1 1 1
-y .
,_, ., . , .,._mg5. ,p r- ,, y., y g -
n.m n,,m y,3-..n._ . ;,.wy-.-. _
, . - _ ._ . . - . . . - - --.-. - - -.~.
ns g (^) - ds . a (a) Direct Lab Staff Effort Period Cumulative i, i (b) Funds ($0000) j Direct Salaries E-i
-8 Materials and Services 3 (Excluding ADP) g ADP Support ' "4 Subcontracts Travel Expenses s Indirect Labor Costs Other(Specify) 1j General and Administrative ] TOTAL j (:)2 1
1
,1 .i y
r g. R 3 ta a
. -{
s
~ 'l l
2 Provide percentage against total funds obligated to date.
- 1
. :l Li Lt - _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . , . _ . _ __
._ . -.w- - . - _ - . . - . _ . - . - . _-
j ~ '. : - O . O i i MEETINGS AND TRAVEL
,; None anticipated.
t l NRC FURNISHED MATERIALS d The NRC Reactor Fuels Section will forward copies of pertinent reports, - i materials and code listings required as input to subtasks after an 7l authorization to start work is issued. j 1. i q - i 1 i
- g
,1 ll' 1 .I b
o j - d p I., i l1 Il
- 1,._ - _ _ _ . . _ . - _ - . _ . - _ _ - - _ _ . . _ . . _ _ ~ . . _ . . . - .-. . _ _ _ _ _ , _ . _ . - . _ . _ - ._
PROPOSAL CONTEN;8
.- - - u -- - \
ENCLOSURE 2 - n ,.- i
' The fo,ilotting items are requirqto s, prepare DOE proposals (!!Re/om 189):
i Project Title - The title should ' e
- general 1oea of the encom?assed work.
b a unioue identifier of the project refle'ctine a In most cases, the title on the NRC State 5ent of Work.(S0k.') snould be used. - Date of Procosal - Self explanatory; include revision number when applicable. URC Office - Indicate the flRC Office (s) supporting or requesting the work.
, FIN Number and B&R Number - Indicate NRC's FIN Number and B&R Number, as drovided on the > Statement of Work. -
J ' t DOE Contractor - Perfoming organization's name. -
! Site - Indicate location (s) of organization that will perfom the work.
j Contractor Account and DOE B&R Number - Provide the information for the highest level l ' feasible.
' Cocnizant Personnel - NRC Project.IManager and oth'er'NRC Technical Staff, if applicable; DOE ! Project Manager; and, .the performing organization's key . personnel: Project Manager and i 3 ; principal pe rsonnel .
investigator (s) and, FTS phone numbers for each; include resume's for contractor Per.iod of Performance - Provide proposed date of commencement of work and best-estimated completion cate of tne project. Staff-Years of Effort and Costs - Estimate c'ests to be incurred by DOE ca.ntractors and . subcontractors. 4 Technical SupportFor consultants, provide the cost of the services on a per staff-year of basis. Inis.shall' include direct salary', indirect expenses and other-l reimbursable amounts; the cost shall also be stated on a per-day basis. . I ,
]f t.ist by fiscal year from" start to completion of th~e project (FIN).Cost estimate will be 4
consistent with DOE Manual 2200, the Pricing Manual, and shown in thousands of dollars. I-- Staf.f-years of Effort (Laboratory personnel only): ' Direct Scientific / Technical 1 , Other Direct (Graded) .m. 9 , .. 1 Costs: ' Direct Salaries (FTE's) - Indirect Labor Costs Material and Services (Excl. ADP) 1/ we Other(specify) ADP Support General and. Admin. Expense ( .%) i Subcontracts j Total Operating Cost - Travel Expense- - 4 o Domestic Capital Equip. - (FIN charged (,_) Total Project Cost
!4 o Foreign ilJ Monthly Forecast Exoense - Provide the planned monthly rate of' costs for firstIfyear . not known at time of proposal submittal, this may be provided in the first monthly business . letter report once the project is authorized. At the beginning of each subsequent year, include the planned monthly rate of costs for the ensbing year in the first monthly business letter report.
- d Forecast Milestone Chart - Complete as shown on NRC Fom 189.
Accroval Authority - Proposal must be signed by an appropriate laboratory or field
" activity representative. Note: This individual may or may not be the same person who isiensthetransmittalletter.
J _
, j he'jeet Description - Provideprative descriptions of th? fQowine topic's in the order J -iTstec on plain paper attachec 40 the NRC Form 189. If an itenf is not ap,plicable, ~so I s ate'on the NRC Fom 189. !i .
- ' 1. Objective of procesed l!crk l a. secterounc - Provice a brief sumary of the technical problem, issue,"cr need so as
.; to orient the reader to the requirements for the work or enc project. !+ b. Objective - State concisely the performing organization's understandinc of the oojective(s), i.e., what will be the end result (s). 2 - ~
- 2. Sumary of Prior Efforts - Not applicable for NRR projects. ,
- 3. a. Work Recuirements - Describe the tasks and subtasks.to be'peFformed in su'ch a i] manner tnat a cisinterested third party can understa'nd what'is' to be done and how it will be accomplished for the level of effort and period,of -performance l; -
proposed. Describe any assumations being made pertinent to perfoming the work.
- { Provide criteria or otner bases upon which evaluations, judgment or other action will be taken. Describe potential problems and recommend solutions. State and
?{ 4 describe separately any ootions being proposed that reqisire NRC approval before d proceeding. !] b. Meetinos and Travel - State the number of trips that the perfoming organ-
!! 1zation will require to perform the work and identify where and how.many people !! are expected to travet ~ Edio travel -is . expected or required, state.none.
d Descritie 'any foreign travel requirements; approval must be obtain~ed,by processing a- ,1 NRC Form 445.
.I c. NRC Furnished Material - Specify any equipment (including ADP), ' background reports 'li) or data, or.otner specific materials required to be provideo by NRC, or equipment ti be purchased.
- , 5 .
Q4 r Description of Any Follow-On Efforts - not applicable for NRR projects. M 5. Relationshio to Other Pr6jects - Identify related projects-that either (1) generate .I ' information tnat will De neeoed to accomplish the work proposed under this project 1 or (2) will use information generated by this. project, and (3) support a conrnon 4 [! objective. H none, so, state o_n, the NRC Fom 189. ,
- - 6; Recorting Recuirements - State the number, type, and other content of the reports
- i recuestec or proposed to be provided, to whom and when they are to be submitted, and, if requested by NRC, whether drafts will be provided prior to finalization.
- L 7. Subcontractor Information - Identify the subcontractor dr consulta'nt and describe i any effort that wi.ll be perfomed by a subcontractor or consultant, and reference J the task or subtask described under the work requirements that the subcontractor or j consultant effort will support. Any work performed by the subcontractor on behalf l i 4 of the nuclear industry that might give rise to an apparent or actual conflict of d interest must be described. If the subcontractor is not known at the time the ia proposal is being submitted, so indicate and describe status and expected time frame j for selection of the subcontractor (-s) or consultant (s).
h . 8. New Capital Ecuicment Recuired - List all capital equipment which must be-purchased by tne. performing organization to perform the work described and provide the estimated cost [ 9. Soecial Facilities Recuired - Describe any new special facilities required. y .' 10. Conflict of Interest Infomation - Describe any significant contractual and organ-izational relationships of the DOE and its contractor on this proposal with 1 industries regulated by the NRC (e.g., utilities, etc.) and suppliers thereof (e.g., ij architect engineers and reactor marufacturers, etc.) that might give rise to an ll . apparent or actual conflict of inte. rest. I +- <i .
- - a rum. % _ o _ . _ - ~ . , - - ~ - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - -
' ~~ ^ - ^ ' ~ ' ^ ~ '
, . . . . . _ _ . . _ . . ._____~~ 1. . m _ . - , . . ---
, As .' ),
BATTELLE, PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORY 'l* j DECEMBER 1983 MONTHLY ACTIVITIES REPORT FOR NRC CORE PERFORMANCE BRANCH PROGRAMS ,l -
. EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
LICENSING FUEL CODE REVIEWS (B2519) , No work was performed on this pr,ogram during this reporting p,eriod. f. iN
- .j ..
FUEL CODE ANALYSIS AND MAINTENANCE (B2520) 4 . . .
" All code work was completed and a final version of GT2R2 was transmitted l' to NRC. A letter report summarizing the code modifications and benchmark calculations has been written.
. FUEL OPERATING EXPERIENCE EVALUATION PROGRAM-IV'(B2521) i . .
i j The camera-ready manuscript (Milestone 2 of Task 3) . entitled ~" Fuel Performance Annual Report for 1982," NUREG/CR-3602 (PNL-4817), was trans- {. j mitted to the NRC at the end of November 1983 as scheduled, which completed this program. l REVIEW OF HIGH BURNUP LICENSING TOPICAL REPORT < % !a - Oraft questions for the Exxon, Westinghouse and Babcock & Wilcox High .
' 1 i
Burnup Topical Reports were sent to NRC. i
- ;ld: 4 FUEL OPERATING EXPERIENCE EVALUATION PROGRAM-V (B2539 9
i2 The NRC Form 189 was transmitted to the NRC prior to December 4,1983 as ,j requested. , h ih FSAR (SECTION 4.2, FUEL) REVIEWS (B2544) g s Questions (Milestone 1 in Task 7) and Draft Safety Evaluation Report i j.. Input (Milestone 2 in Task 1) were transmitted to the NRC as scheduled. d
} .
,'!a 1 q l c_ _ _ [}__
. .....~_....:...c......; . ..
...,s
(} f-7i v revised NRC Form 189 (Task 7 was deleted per the NRC) was transmitted as requested. On December 27, PNL was directed by the NRC to discontinue further 4 work on Tasks 4 and 5 until PNL receives new directions.
~ . . .... .
i 4
, < h, .- -. _. . . .
i t
;1 .
i i s i . N-2 ; r+. -
, cl
- s
- n -.
rJ 4.
' :.j j ;*
I
;4 di i >-
A V 5.8 V; t 2 li :u'i}
'.1 f
1.
. .n ,. _ .. n..- . . . - . . _ _ . . , , .
. . _ . . _ . . . _ . _ . . . . - _ - _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . , ....v....
.P -6 O -
O \ PROJECT TITLE: REVIEW OF HIGH BURNUP LICENSING TOPICAL REPORTS 1
- j i
OBJECTIVE: i i i The objective of this program is to perform the balance of the review l' 4 i and prepare the TER for each of the five vendor topical reports on extended-burnup effects. The reviews are to be conducted with full awareness of )! , 4 Sections 4. 2, 4.3, 4.4, and Chapter 15 of the Standard Review Plan to ensure I j that the effects of high-burnup operation are accomodated for all of the 4 l regulatory requirements addressed by these parts of the SRP. i - i 4 FIN NO. 82533 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: C. E. Beyer PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: November 7, 1983 to July 31, 1984 i REPORTING PERIOD: December 1983 gi.
; PROJECT STATUS
- 1. Work Completed During Period i :)
l) Draft questions for the Exxon (XN-NF-82-06(P), Revision 1), Westing- )j house (WCAP-10125), and Babcock & Wilcox (BAW-10513P) High Burnup Topical ! i} Reports were sent to NRC.
,- 2. Problems or Delays } None.
ie f 3. Sumary of Progress to Date 1 Oraft questions for the Combustion Engineering (CENPD-269-P), Exxon i (XN-NF-82-06(P), Revision 1), Westinghouse (WCAP-10125), and Babcock & I p Wilcox (BAW-10513P) High Burnup Topical Reports were sent to NRC. h 4. Plans for Next Reporting Period l{ Complete the draft questions for the General Electric High Burnup Topical Report.
!I l
) l
':. 11
.A u l v
, {l
_ .. . .... . -- . . . : w-. . a _ . . - ... - ..........e. .-. n
~
O v FINANCIAL STATUS Balance of Funds Needed,
- 1. Total Projected Funds Obligated By Fiscal Year, $
Project Cost, $ To Date, $ FY-1984 FY-1965 125K 125K 0.0K Total Costs During the Current Time Period and Cumulative to Date 2. l Period, $ Cumulative, $
- a. Direct Salaries 10.3K 10.3K 4
'I b. Materials and Services 0.0 0.0 '
a i
] c. ADP Support 0.0 0.0 i : d. Subcontracts 0.0 0.0
- e. Travel 1.1 1.1
.i
- f. Indirect Labor Costs 3.0 3.0 I
- g. Other (specify) 3.2 3.2 i
- h. General and Administrative 7.3 7.3 Total 24.9K 24.9K (20%)
l I i 3. Total Costs During the Current Time Period and Cumulative to Date for j Each Task 1 l Period $ Cumulative, $ e , fl
- q Task 1: 5.5K 5.5K
- s1 Task 2
- 2.9 2.9 Task 3: 5.5 5.5 4
Task 4: 5.5 5.5 2 d Task 5: 5.5 5.5 b E e
.b . 'i 12 1
3 1
. 27
- _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ __}}