ML20198H742
| ML20198H742 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 05/16/1986 |
| From: | Chaffee A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Withers B PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20198H748 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-36, REF-GTECI-SF, RTR-NUREG-0612, RTR-NUREG-612 NUDOCS 8605300537 | |
| Download: ML20198H742 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000344/1986010
Text
r
O
.
!
$ ^ *} '
- "*
Docket No. 50-344
Portland General Electric Company
121 S. W. Salmon Street
Portland, Oregon 97204
Attention:
Mr. Bart D. Withers
Vice President Nuclear
Gentlemen:
Subject: NRC Inspection of the Trojan Nuclear Plant
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. S. A. Richards and Mr. G. C.
Kellund of this office on March 18 - April 28, 1986 of activities authorized
by NRC License No. NPF-1, and to the discussion of our findings held by Mr.
Richards and Mr. Kellund with Mr. Orser and other members of your staff
periodically during the inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection
report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective
examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with
personnel, and observations by the inspectors.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified within the scope of this
inspection.
Please note, that an unresolved item (section 8 of the enclosed report)
appears to have stemmed from a lack of full understanding of system
performance requirements and interface with procedure reviews, Plant Review
Board reviews, and operations and maintenance interfaces. Also, note that
the Licensee Event Report related to this unresolved item did not detail this
root cause and the various opportunities to discover the problem.
In
particular, this raises a concern in the area of your problem resolution and
followup program.
In a telephone conversation with M. M. Mendonca on May 8, 1986, W. S. Orser
agreed that a revision of the LER would.be submitted to highlight the root
cause and corrective actions from your study of the problem. Further, in a
telephone discussion with J. B. Martin and yourself on May 14, 1986, you
agreed that you and your management would direct more attention to these
areas. We encourage you to give these efforts a high priority and keep us
appraised of your progress.
8605300537 h h 344
DR
ADOCK
-
/ U
yg
.-
,
.
.
-2-
t
-(t1AY 161986
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a), a copy:of this letter and the enclosures
-will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
The response' directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice is not
subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management of Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Should you have any. questions con'cerning this inspection, we will be glad to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
A' f
A. E. Chaffee, Chief
Reactor Projects Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
2.
Inspection Report No. 50-344/86-10
cc w/ encl:
State of Oregon (Dixon)
W. S. Orser
J. W. Durham, Esq., PGE
bec w/ enclosures:
RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector
Project Inspector
G. Cook, RV
B. Faulkenberry, RV
,
J. Martin, RV
bec w/o enclosure 2:
LFMB-
REGION V
M ln
H h\\
k
V
SRichards/ dot
GKellund
MHendonca
AChaffee
5//p /86
5//0/86
5/ /v/86
5//h/86