ML20198C802

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR-100 Portable Exposure Sys Horizontal Shock Test
ML20198C802
Person / Time
Site: 07109157, 07109156
Issue date: 09/29/1996
From: Cuthberston T
INDUSTRIAL NUCLEAR CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20198C722 List:
References
ANSI-N432-1980, NUDOCS 9801080062
Download: ML20198C802 (35)
v • d • e


Text

-

I I

.m o.,,,.,

IR 100 PORTABLE EXPOSURE SYSTEM flNSI N432-1980 HORIZONTAL SHDCK TEST September 29,1996 l

Safety Latch Plate Industrial Nuclear Company 2515 Williams Street San I.e a nd ro, California 94577 (510) 352-6766 Fax # (510) 352-6772 1

i i

9801000062 971229 ~

l PDR ADOCK 07109156 l-PDR g

l ci on.tt t

g.

$. % (>$ f ligk 4'

k: >

?

Is iJ P

e

+

t1 4

1 e,

I

INDUSTRI AL NUCLERR COMPANY TAllLE OF CONTENTS l' A G E I.0 INTRODUCTION I

2.0 TEST PI'RFORMED I

3.0 REFERENCES

I 4.0 TEST SET tlP AND l'ERFORM ANCE I

4.1 TESTING 2

4.1.I TEST No. I 2

Test Results 4.2.1 TEST No. 2 2

Test Results 4.2.2 TEST No. 3 2

Test Results 5.0 ATTACllMENTS 3

Figures I through 4 l'ictures I through 7 TEST WITNESS!'D llY 3

IR 100 PORTABLE EXPOSURE SYSTEM TEST RNSI N432-1980 September 29,1996 i

l

INDUSTRI AL NUCLEAR COMPANY 1,0 Introduction - Industrial Nuclear Company (INC) recently identified as a notentially more " fragile aren" (as specified in ANSI N432-1980. Paragraph 8.3.2), (1e Safett 1,atch Plate on the IR100 Portable Ex,osure System (device) than that previously tested.

It appeared that if the Safety 1,atch Plate was struck directly on the front surface of the plate (with the source in the safe loeked position) that the plate could be defonned and deemed inoperable. It also appeared that the Plate might be susceptible to damage il struck from the top and side.

1.1 To assure that this type of potential damage was not possible, a bumper which would prevent defonnation, was welded to the back of the Safety 1,atch Plate, in addition the top outer edge of the Plate was chamfered at a 45/50 degree angel to a depth of appn>ximatcly 3 mm.

1.2 A tetest was required to comply with ANSI N432-1980, Paragraph 8.2.

2.0 Test Performed 2.I llorizontal Shock directly to the inmt surface of the modified Safety Latch Plate.

2.2 llorizontal Shock directed to the side of the Safety 1,atch Plate.

2.3 llorizontal Shock with the device in the vertical position, directly to the top of the Safety I,atch Plate.

3.0 References a.

10CFR Part 34.20, Subsection (e)(2),1994 Edition.

h.

ANSI N432, Paragraph 8.2,1980 lidition.

4.0 Test Set ilu and Performance A 50 mm diameter rod 300 mm long was welded, in the center and peq)endicular te the plane of a earbon steel plate,9.5 mm thick and 640 mm X 760 mm. The plate was secured to the vertical supports of a 5 ton fork lift with the 50 mm diameter rod parallel to the ihmr.

The id 100 Portable Exposure System (device) was suspended from the raised forks of the Imk lift so that in the rest position the " fragile area" of the device was in contact veith the end of the 50 mm diameter axl.

A womien chute was constructed with a back stop so positioned that the device could be pulled away from the 50 mm diameter rod to a point where the altitude of the center of gravity of the deviec was increased by 100 mm above the rest position prior to being pennitted to pendulum back into the 50 nun diameter rod. The wooden chute prevented any lateral movement during the pendulum swing. The chute was sized to prevent any.

frictionalinterference with the devh:c during the pendulum swing. The test apparatus design and test performance was consistent with the guidance contained in ANSI N432-1980, Paragraph 8.2.2 and 8.2.3.

lH 188 PDHTABLE EXPOSUHE SYSTEM TEST HNSI N432-1'388 September 29,1996 Page 1 of5

s INDUSTRI AL NUCLEAR COMPRNY 4.1 Testing 4.1. I Test No.1 - The device was prepared with a dummy sourec in the kicked position and the stonige plup and dust cap u stalled, suspended in the rest position, with the front surface of the hafety 1.utch Plate in contact with the end of the 50 mm diameter axi.

The device was then moved from the rest position to the full extent pennitted by the installed back stop and allowed to pendulum back to the rest position causmg the end of the 50 mm diameter rod to strike the front surface of the Safety 1,atch Plate.

This procedure was repeated 20 times.

Test Results.The device was removed from the test apparatus. The storage plug and dust cap removed from the device. A test drive cable was attached to the dummy source.

The device was unlocked and using the test drive cable the source was exposed aad returned to the storage position with case. The source capture device functioned as designed. The device unlocking, source exposure, return and capture sequence was repeated several times without incident.

4.1.2 Test No. 2 -It was attempted to position the device to iennit the 50 mm diameter nxi to strike the side of the Safety 1,atch Plate. It was fount that the chamfer on the top outer edge of the Safety 1,atch Plate prevented the 50 mm diameter nxi from touching the side of theSafety I,atch Plate (see Figure 2).

Test Results - A side impact horizontal shock test was not possible with the modified Safety I,atch Plate (see Figure 4).

4.1.3 Test No. 3 - The device was suspended in a hiek box down position with the top of the Safety 1,atch Plate in contact with the 50 mm diameter rod. The repositioned stop contuet was reset to assure that when the device rested against the stop the altitude of the center ofgravity of the device was 100 mm above the rest position. The device was moved to the prepositioned stop and allowed to pendulum and impact the 500 mm diameter rod (see Figure 3). This procedure was repeated 20 times.

Test Results - The deviec was removed from the test apparatus. The storage plug and dust cup removed from the device. A test drive cable was attached to the dummy source.

The device was unkieked and using the test drive cable the source was exposed and returned to the storage position with ease. The source capture device functioned as designed. The device unh>cking, sourec exposure, return and capture sequence was repeated seveml times without incident.

IR 108 PORTABLE EXPOSURE SYSTEM TEST -

HNSI N432-1988 September 29,1996 Page 2 of 3

INDUSTRIRL NUCLERR COMPANY 5.0 Attachmenh Figure 1 Test setup for direct shock on Safety Latch Plate.

Figure 2 device. y of side view of target, Safety 1,atch Plate and,rujection Geometr i

Figure 3 Test setup tor top Safety 1,atch Plate shoek test.

Figure 4 ModifiedSafety 1.atch Plate.

Picture !

Test setup.

Picture 2 Device pulled buek to stop for release.

Picture 3 Device released.

Picture 4 Device striking the target.

Picture 5 Device ntler 20 impacts.

Picture 6 Safety Latch Plate aller edge ground.

Picture 7 Device operational atter all test perron led.

lA

$b Date Tom RUiUiTEnson Radiation Safety Officer, INC Test was witnessed by:

State of California, Department of ifealth Services, Radiologic lieulth Bnmeh, Berkeley, CA.

State of California, Depanment of flealth Services, Radiologie flealth Bmneh, Saemmento, CA.

lH 188 PORTH8LE EXPOSURE SYSTEM TEST -

HNSI N432-1988 September 29,1996 Page 3 of3

V LIAISED FORKS ON FORK LIFT TRUCK.

~

/_ $U$pd.siott

- LAPOLUl(L OCVICC F T1 -- e g

100 mm

['

h -- =q _..

s i

t.

Q

\\

/

300mm PORK 1,IFT TI:UCK.

FIG. 1 TEST SETUI' FOlt DIRECT SilOCK ON SAFETY LATC!l l' LATE.

/'

/

\\

/

\\

t R Mt t

/

,\\

.mt q I

bw r'

g.'.,..

l i

'\\. I

\\

s e-

)

4 _

., W hl^^ -

l o

l..,

.?

PICTURE NO.

1.

.'1

,.'.....s... :

,s TEST SETUP i

-,---...,n---..

_n,..-,.-

l I

l i

i 4

}

I 1

I i

\\

l i

4. -

i s.

i 1

=

(

1

,1

'7 ve..

1 h, 1 g n' O t;y'. " l

~

~

%;;l ;Ol$;,

.Q. '

  • l

,4b 1

.%,, e,&.c z-p 0 N k, ru,;&,% $ A?ek'*e r

w l'ICTURE NO.

2.

. u,.,

i mawaveramww._

l

!)l;V I CE l'UI, LED liACM TO STol',

i I

i 1

i i

1 i

a4

.. g _.,

y r,

l g

- e

.; r o,,

e-f l

6 s

j 4,a

? 'y,.

0, i

g_

[

L l

' [.

i 4

c

.m' g

~

w r

I

)

8

  • Q e

$dunyw

.. 4..Q. 1~ f j,, f,.

M l

m.

x;\\-l g*/^, ~4, k ' ;..,$[?'l68AMO~25h%'l.s,_j,f.* -~ h h;." [..' N l ?g ) \\ .e

f. $, gAQ( l'ICTURE NO.

3. A, / aldblL M *vrc:.;%';rxrmt ... N2 .41 ,;.u..L a CU If ELMASl:D, i J

l I il l i i l 1

l l

i .i 1 I i i l l 1 a l i I 4 .1.H6 l l 1 i l l (, i r .I < + vintey[J]),g. a:- cw 4 T8 c ~+' 4 4 _.sr +.j' -+ o 1, w-4 4 ) PICTURE NO.4.,, i. s -.~,, . c,.. m. me, ._m_. maas -_u.2 I ) l DEVICE STRIKING TARGET. 1 i i i l i l i i l t i } l w -g ww we--- ar e--ve-++e w w -w w_ m e%w e-ww- - iw,-ewer e-w-=--=-s e--- - - * + - - -- - - - - - - - -

__.i l l i I I' J I i s .I I 1 1 l 1 \\ 4 l l j I 1 i i ) 1 i i i t\\ 3 1 ks b i es sp V .P. q' b 1-PICTURE NO. 5.

??,,

utanza

ALakes, Dl;VICE Al'TER 20 IMPACTS ON SAFETY LATCil PLATE.

h ,i l l L., ~ )p..,;- -o y. j i,3 i, '- A' j [. j-l T ,3 -. i f, We q + 1. r In ' ?? !

i PICTURE NO. 6.i bi ;xdocv -

+ ~ 4 SAFETY

1. ATCll i> LATE Ar'TER EDGE ilEVEl,ED.

1 k Je / w k W*?~ j fjpr ~ e 1 g l,. \\ e \\ e e J a DEVICE OPERATIONAL AFTER ALL TESTS PERFORMED. t i I

t l THETIRG_QF INDUSTRIALS NUCT,HAR *210DHis IR100 CAMMHA T1PH ll UBA/9157/Illn) SERT /1.t, 84005. sullMirrHD ON IQl30/90 i FOlt INDUSTRIAL NUCLEAlt COMPANY l 2515 WIll,IAMS STREET SAN I.EANDit0, CA 94577 MR. E. W. IlUDDLESTON, PRESIDENT ,,a,,. .~ N" var NOVEMisEli 5,1990 O mama meer l i Testing Engineers, Inc. hiaterial.< Consultathm Testirsg & Itsmecthm bietallurgical& NDTSert4ces OAKLAND SANTA CLARA S ACRAMENT O

{}uality Auurance Serthrs ililim .\\lateriah nunulting mems Testing Engineers, Inc. February 12, 1992 Industrial Nuclear Company LAB NO.: M2025 2515 Williams Stroot PROJECT No.: 14543 San Loandro, CA 94577

Subject:

Tonsilo tests for controls on Industrial Nuclear's Ir. 100 Camera, S/N 4069. Gontlemons At. your roguest wo havo performed the subject testing on the Ir. i 100 Camora, submitt.ed on February 7, 1992. I'l!QCIIRUllis Testing was performod in accordance with ANSI standard N432 Section 8.7, " Tons 110 test for cont.rols ". TENSILl? REMOTE CONTROL 1. Tho remoto control was attached to the exposure device and t.he exposure devico was secured so that it would not movo during tost. To the final position of the remote control a tensilo load of 500N (120 lbs.) was applied. The load was maintained for 30 seconds and the t.ost was repoated 10 t.imos. TENSILE TESTS REMOTE CONTRO1, CAllLE 2. The remoto control was connected to the exposuro device and the exposuro devico was secured to ensure that it would not iaovo during the test. A tons 11e force of 1000N (240 lbs. ) was applied to tho and portion of the remoto control cablo, and maintained for 10 seconds. This procedure was repeated 10 times. 2811 Adehne Street. RO Box 24075. Oakland. Cahfornia 94623. (415) 835 3142 SANI A Ct ARA * [MABLo VALL D

  • SACHAMEN1o
  • mon 1LHEY

JtESULTS Af ter completion of Tensile tests the cables, swedges, and threads were examined for any obvious defects, no defects were observed. A performance test was then conducted to verify proper operation of the camera. The operation of the camera was satisfactory. If there are any questions -regarding this report please contact the unde signed at (510) 835-3142-ext. 278.- Si k), _ R.eview &}} re f / N l Dan Watanabe Assistant Metallurgist N Jpy Dorst Staff' Engineer l p 'lr i .*-,,,,,.na, ..-,-ms- ,-,--,-,n-m,,,,w-, ,,n, -,--w- ,-----c. ,,n,-. we, w-- ,-,->,-r y -s,- w

a gam!$N ,7 d.adw. / 4 / A TEl CONSULTING ENGINEERS A Divhlon of Testing Engineers,Inc. *

  • 1

- Q W.$Pi - C.$Nj$$ listorials Labfilo.k u.1 Fubruary 3, 1992 li1011 Project llumb^c'r'.' E14 543 IllDUDTitIAL liUCLEAlt COMPA!1Y 4 ' 2S15 Willlama 28treet liff ;~/ .h;$, b [f p - San 1,candro, California 94577 )M [5 W.111uddicaton', President: k{N1(5Y.4N ? Z, EQl-ATTil: 14r. b f "t 'ih4 f& ,i4l 5.Y Te s tin lf,!~ *g o't Industr'ial flucl'eaFa Mod 517:IRiO[kDah SUBJ: Typo D USA /9157[u] Sorlal'/ 290912 0" M,', * * ' ' '.i'J ),Q 4 ' ..n v Dea r !4r. Iluddlonton: '\\ 2n accordance' with your requent, wo have comp 3,oted the subject tenting. Et!RPODE The purpone of the tenting in to verify that the aubject ' radiography nyatom will remain operational after 20,000 cycleo. INtoCUpEtt n & Rgat&TL 1. Fatiguo Test Teating was substantially in accordance with AllSI. Standard 11432, noccion 0.0 na to110was hGjg The subject camo'ra was conndetod to' thd appara,wh g.;. d i tustahos in photon L& 2. The toot.. apparat'ta conalata ol', a roversible variable speed motor with a controller; noc Photon 3 & 4. The motor van connected to tho hand crank as shown in Photo -3. - A rollarl* haih alao driven c by the motor had-an. actuator, tab

  • connected toisit'ipLimit cuitchoc were adjunted udsthat when th*o cou'rco' was full?~f6trabted 'or fully extracted, the tab actuatea one of the limit uwitelfoc' and revorces i

the motor action. The limit cWitches allowedjthe courco to momentarily impact the acata and o'trodo the drifo icable at both r extreme positions. The limit awitchen are shown in, photo 5. The number of cycles was monitored with a anap action awitch connected to a battery operated counter. Tho' awitch ia only actuated when the actuator tab panaca over it in"ono ^ direction,voo that full cycloo are counted. The average timo~ to completo one cyclo van approximately So acconda. Photo 6 depicts the counter nwitch. i' LW, twi 2811 Adelino Street P.O. Box 24075 + Oakland, CA 94023 b]4i5) 835-3142 S.m hancis$o

  • Santa Clara y Stoc[t( f f0!al>to Val &{SUtN,cnto w
    • p

,w 4 w. acp., a i +.q q;p i } y? J,9p ]G ./ k D y{ hy 4 .g u, g3;;. 7 sf )~INDUDTRIAN NUCLEAR COMPANY

  • Q AGB _.TWO;-,

Mr. E.W. Iluddlecton ,( t,. - February 3 1992O b -:r N f.g.m$ ' 4. t,;. $ $$s ?? <3 g r m The toot ran continuously with a few shut downs.un 11Td% count of 20,000 cycles was' achieved. At tho ciid$of the 3st remained oporational, but exporlonced come wear.,"$j.Q,.gth y% 43Gf 3.m v

2. Tennion Tont i

thesdsih'M'u-;. w-Art.or the t.0mpletion of the f atiguo tent, ource ausembl* nd drivo cablo woro 'ubjected to the following tensi:1 ests6 c

.h a,.

E a g= 3;- u w, 1 S c a l e d c o u;k tm a Stop ball.it'6TEoO'rco ac'adinblyrcottosourcosassembly,h[9 / [ s 1. ( 3 2. 3. Source asocmbly.. connector.to courco; assembly e. 4. Drivo cablo{to courco asifemblyy 4 Q j i i MP i0. if DM '. '.'4 d M r. Each of thoso connections were subjected to a tensi'le'{forco of 200 lb. The load wadinaintained for a period of 3 0(6c61dn. 8. 8. fidconds :and then roloaced ao spobified in AliSI Standard 114 32, S The nource accombly :Was examined for signs of distr 66dT llo visiblo .g<w' uigna of distress were observed.

8.lb.

RoucMilton (4 >.p., 1. The tant camera rnmained operational aftof} DOT 000 cycles. Somo waar was oberrved. 2 The sourco assembly and drivo cablo sustalnod a tonsilo forco of 200 lho with no vlaible sign of distress. 1 -.

'j

,.,9 g Abiona regarding tiildhoporti, h'$ ' i af N 'T?y birj'oh If you have any, furthor nervic6',#plchao conta'ct thatundersigned ,I &*,j... ?gf,.:: T

4. p %

v ,a Sinceoly'yourh!O ( ,;h, iki, 4,[' fth g.,, 4 G < nh, , J., ,@)*! i %.REV1 M"'" pt

, g '.,

TEI O U MIN j.tNGINEERS / p Q &.1 V-A h f. l.yW? h i: '. Yt" o 'T h. s/~ onM.$;% f / c.' 1, .NA, S;p caniel watana c y.IgW)S af'. Edgihoc.,f',5) Acain tant'- Mo ta'11,urgi'ot W + e x, t ~ 4 u S! s.. 4, i. 4 %, f.h $hk X;p W ..v.: }N 'n v, 1 M. wN 4 $:. (s,N;,.. 3,, < p, A ..f.<,a&.w+ g v( .s;,.:.p m, c /

7. % h.y

~m, UDfTSOI.T. IN. G..,,.E.N..GINEE 7 1. ... ~.. - - -.., -. - .,, _. -. _. - -, _.., - -..,,, _ _,.. - - - ~.. -., --,._....i-,..m~,,-_..--

I O quatu r. iswrance sei nm EEEIE l Alutettah Gmutiling m Testing Engineers, Inc. O t bor 29, 1990 I INDUSTRIAL NUCLEAR COMPANY Materials Laboratory No. M0103 2515 Williams Stroot 18ro j ec t. No. 14543 g San Loandro, CA 94577 At.tontion: Mr. E. W. Iluddlus t.on, Prosident

Subject:

Tonting of Inditittrial Nuclear's Model IR100 Camorn Tyr>o_11 USb/9157/Ilf u t Sprial f 4 005. submitir&: 10/26BA I

Dear Mr. Huddloston:

I At your request, wo have performed a free drop test and a puncture test on the camera submitted on 10/26/90. Testing was performed in accordance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission 10 CFR Ch. 1 (1-1-90 Edition) S71.73 flypothetical accident conditions. The ambient I air temperature throughout the test was approximately 10*F. The weight of the camera was 52.4 pounds. Testing was witnessed by Mr. E. W. Iluddleston. d THSTING J'80CHDUIMji 1) YREE DROP g A froo drop of the camera through a distance of nino 3 meters (30 ft.) into a flat, ossentially unylolding, horizontal surfaco, striking the surface in a position for which maximum damage is expected. I 2) PUNCTURE I A froo drop of the camera through a distance of one meter (40 inchos) in a position for which maximum damage is

expoeted, onto the upper end of a solid,
vertical, cylindrical mild stool bar mounted on an essentially l

unyielding, horizontal surface. The bar.was 15 cm (six inchos) in diamotor, with the top horizontal and its edge rounded to a radius of not more than six mm (1/4 inches) I and of a length as to cause maximum damage to the camera, but not less than 20 cm (oight inches) long. The long axis of the bar was vortical. B 5 2811 Adehne Street. P.O Box 24075. Oakland. Cahtortua 94623. (415) 835 3142 S ANI A CL AH A

  • DI A uto VAL L t t
  • 5ACHAML N10 MONiLHLY L

Mr. E. W. liuddleston, Prosident Materials Laboratory No, M0103 INDUSTRIAL NUCLEAR COMPANY Project No. 14543 PAGE 2 m = RHHVh.'@ BRST TRST 1) Boforo tho 30 foot drop tost the camera was woighod and photographed. Damago sustained from the drop was documented with photographs. Lock Box was broken of f and sourco was dislodged and thrown approximately 10 foot from camora. Suo attached photographs (pagou 4 thru 7). 2) No puncture test was performed, camera failed 30 foot drop test. (tRTHST INDUSTRIAL NUCLEAR COMPANY repaired the fillot wold around the lock box of the camera. At Mr. Iluddluston's request a second tost was performed on the camera (Sorial #4005) after the I repair was mado. The second test was conducted using the same testing proceduro. Testing was witnessed by Mr. E.W. Iluddluston. I 1) Bofore tho 30 foot drop test, the camera was weighed and photographed. Damage sustainod from the drop was I documented with photographs. The source did not becumo dislodged. Sou attached photos (pagos 8 thru 12). 2) Damago sustained from the puncture test is documented I with photographs. The source did not becomo dislodged. Soo attached photographs (pages 13 and 14). I p .5 5 5

Mr. E. W. Iluddleston, President Mat.orialu 1.aboratory No. M01U3 INDUSTRIAL NUCLEAR COMPANY Project No. 14543 PAGE 3 If you have any question regarding this report pleano contact the undersigned at (415)835-3142, ht. 276. Vury truly yours, TE T NG,E INEERS, INC. ot h S W ~L DdnWatanabo Assistant Metallurgist Dwigy /,-.,m.s Ql~'g@H SS[![}gt. Attachmonts fRVD\\l$bij.f? /.h;l\\$ U ');f}'M N,N REVIEWED BY: j}f2 % A,: a pg/ / g TESTING E!!GINEERS, INC. hi / h 2 Y,p.at-v, f 6, gjsi kI t6: h Y $lflN'di ih$f f-x ft lCMb y (MT-1565) N 3 %,;, s7j.jj g. D111 Koyaor, P.E. I Consulting Motallurgical .... s and Quality Engineer (QU-2520) I cci Mark Unutista, TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.% Bob Gatowood, TESTING ENGIFhi.RS, INC. E Mark llumbert, SEYFORTil SHAW FAlltWEATi!ER AND GERALDSON Chris Kavalaris, TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. Bill Keysor, P.E., TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. John 11. Martin, USNRC h Puto Palko, TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. 8 E R S E

M

p tj; Mr. 1:.

W. liuddi o u t on, Prosidunt Ma t.o r i a l u 1.a tsu ra to ry fJo, M010.1 17, !!JDUSTi(I AI, fiUCl,EAlt COMPA14Y l> ro j ec t ido, 14'.243 jf l' AG E 4 pd fd V. p C:- } ,e s e 'I 1 '1 g. j _ y;. : r!b ( 1 [,k .,.,',t,

  • .',* $. 4 I ~

)' 4 a 'g f '

  • .b,u[* k'f,.....

'*t.. If 4 3 4) 4,p..y: r:.: t.i. g.g*, e o) c ;(. 3 .7,4. :': ..n s- .s,>,< l., ,~Q 'N l ,9 (. g; ; i s ) cC.' t- ,l.a. ..y e .a, r r gj .- a., %,s 4 ~' ..., +,* _g ,=h &..+ la i. 's '. - g 4' a ,,v, t $ @ ~<r,\\ p &; / > 3' it,3,.;/ijl s.*:g %pr.*':.,. r .s eg . g,.,, L j,,,. Al. y 74 i s .yf s-c e'4 l Y f 's 6 y, que - a\\ 7h i h g Y E E -_~ E c.utenA nt:Fons.w bovr ytu:t: vat.L V1pg[ '!1.;sr E

I sa .s [. Mr. E. W. Iluddluston, l' ro t> 1 d u n t Ma te r i a l :1 1.alio ra to r y tdu. M0103 [ lllDUSTRI AL 11UCLEAlt COMPAtJY Project tJo. 14!s4 3 Jm PAGU L tM p! /g [A i o M --r -' f.c 1h l ,,gp 4 l ) tli [! '1 k' b \\ \\ i i I i{ il a V L_ l l +n llHFoltX lt0 IM)or FitXX 'st.I,. l'IllH'l' TRST l i i 7 4 ,J i. (: A1116 0 N I f t AuttiAt: Itvt l M ail i ill At l i e,6 t' f bl*t CI A L. I U l4 M i N. O. ti. w - w T -m 1 ~ tid $,,., "ifl [ 'l,': B l E E liRVous 30 Fuor vites yst.l.. Fil;.yg; y;gg. E I

MdtLuridlu 1.a tio rd L u t ~y ido. MO103 ' 'If

1. !Jl ( ). /}(
  • b y,3, (I

l Il'U)uCL too. J 4 *>.13 { l a o & N!, 4.\\.1 f q fo %~ l l II w s 1

lU 1930l',.',tgg,,y;,j, UNn> s1 Ext j>LATX

(,_ Etu.n n:sr 9 y( ey I ^ s.. .s.. \\.,* J' lli j ( F { ~* ge i r T0yot4 g h d ) 6 [R 'fy. !" y m e m. 9 w A m, j A AM %n,.a%,,?g~ g y m m .s e. g y; . d i a 'x I .i PJ f: j'

ty*)

( - [ O st: AIUhlRNT ..w [( Ab*lWit

p s s...,

g ?' } fis,W;;ame ' y[ r 5 j hhhgQ gg y$

, +.,

,3,,,, u.7 w ,~ i y p & g e_ n +in.ttssr

, n.a gn.e MIDII h N' t

y Tf fj II,, 3 .:nny ylQW .g ) <- t Ns m',,.a s ~sMk g;kygf, e nj . [jy 1 4 U1 . - ~

i Mr. E. W. Iluddlus ton, P ru u l d un t. Na t.ui i a l u I,abora t.ory tiu. M0103 ItJDUSTHI A1, !JUCLEAlt COMPA!JY l>roject No. 14'243 PAGE */ ,I i i ( = 4 3 % c %, f.y's yw t. I

A f'

g , j " ?:$ d ', .iq

  • ~,

'h'<l,,...,.5'? ' \\ ' ",)

) '.

4 's /i ( (,a wir l h . rq ' y fu ' 'hif,,R..' 9 i-7 AFTKit 30 FYX)T VitKR VAI.1, , jy AltitOW INDICATES l'UINT 3 ,s j v .,l- ' ' UV lhil'At?)'. SUUltCK WAS HISI,Ul> GNU AND \\ i VOUND Al*1'ItuX.10 VKKT l b A WA Y VRUAI l'AhlXitA i I ,f sia n!st \\ T ) f' S V M ". f !./) p% I. II J- ~ f'n... [t O 3 l bg - l e f ' i e ]._ l

l 1

. ~ _ _ _ _ _,. -... ~... _. _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _.. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

1 f l Mt E. W. liuddloutori, P rou i dorit Ma t u r.l a l an 1.abora to ry Idu. Mul03 l fj 1!4DUSTitl AL IJUCl.EAH COMPA!JY ProJuct tio. 14S4J I PAGE 8 l i; h f, . S p ;;. r,r.,,..b,,v%s t v c, f*". ' '? ~1Y "'T z, y, .,, a; {( ,y "t; 4 if... E

\\ '

? \\ [' d ' .{ Q'<kk j {,[ 1 l 1.sNUTH h!Altssit tI YAltl) int'ushisNTS) ILIGlW1.' f, _ f$ $ I I I l cAhtsus nsruns 30 voor ntss FAu. Itsrssr b - ~ ~.

4 Mr. E. W. Iludd l us ton, uruuident lidDUSTRI AL flUCLEAR COMl'AfJY Maturi a l u 1.atfora tory 140. M010:1 PAUM 9 Project. 14 0 14 $4 :1 j F !l f. t +-= m.mmm w 1.~ s., ;[ 8 1 s I 't 5 + Mki !hih h 7 7 i% A,4 l1 4 .s g ~* i;, !l ,9 13 + -A

  • D?2?k lRS b, 'T.

x.w..am ammes.amsmmers ,5 (MAIKRA HRF0HX 30 Voor VnXX VAU. ItXTRsr l 9 1 j (. .1 4 4'. ,y .~,- ~ n,.... l 'Y y, 3>.J.y h..-4<(g, c, Q.,r_.'4 y,* r.eg y . n- .. s, s,. ,.. ~.. c. ,.,, w. cAhtsus nsyons ao your Fuss FAu.. lg;ngt .-...,_.w.v.,,,....,,._.m.._..._,m,.-. ...,,_-._m,,, m

mvmeA. A.e .,e ei.s_m..,...,.vAd. e--m._4-e6-mA_me...a.,MaaweL,_ 4--.Ji4m me. mm..w.4ap',' -%-+- .(ah.m a w.m.m w.m.-w,...4hm.w..e. E [$/fph"E"M"nJg;>+a se u,, m,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _ l'mject n,, g4g43 3 l I I $$M$r %+m;w I - w ~4, ! [ N. , Qr % j

l 7

I I fa s, G3 3 ' ~- t.\\ l' -e 7' g ) 3 a 5 f. ,E. s ~,i 'a* 1 'g 4 e-e l [ "d $ i y^, m t

e..

. 4,,, Ae m ~., ' ~ *.. X% \\ I ,f*..QsiR g , *"'.. ~-ig6,g { g7 N. v ^ 70Yora g g, ~ f,g,gk;~$, 5W,Ge,%,, .. - ~, wa - NP m..

hd fCQSCw +.o Q

w '* Y s f;;k jQ%$hES~^ A & *-?: - ,sg,. a. O &.m % ' %y:.L%M; 29 ' ~ 4 [

3f93, 4

s, ATR, jpyt.gy,

  1. YOUT FREN ysyy, y,;, n,,,

.----.,-,--..._-,---_-..,--w.-,,-- --n.---- ..---.n ,,---.,..e..__,.n.-.,,,,,,,-

Ms. H. W. Iluddlustun, Prus2dont Motorialu 1.aboratory ido. M0103 i 1HDUSTRI AL IJUCLEAlt COMPAfJY PAGE 11 Projuet_ tio. 14S13 it ; c., y p;.7- .,u, d i i I SPECIAL FORM in N.O.S. g ) j a l I ii i -.-- b gl,AEb[f[Ncf;k' k,' Ufj 5 .. g, [ fM ' s 4 A. Jb; T MO:"?; g l

  • $J

'kyO(' NTW k l O Qt~g 6 $. h ? 5 L'* Q'; fyr ~ h', lk L r Q i M 7. e .y y g e q yr G' ) ff E f

3.

t i p ?? [ $i ,% 4 i.G 1 A . CV

  1. 1 LMW

, dhhi ) , f %, ietL i Aew.m a U.G AITKli 30 FOOT Fl?KK FAI.1, Altit0W INDICATES DAhlAllED AltKA. SolillCK IS STil.i. INTACT llNTEST -,,.-,w,.-.,re,-. w,,w-._..- -w--,_w.----.., .-ww,,.-_.--wm,,--., r--- .-n, m

Mr. !!. W. Iluddluston, Prouldunt Ma tur bs l o 1.abora tory No. M010 :1 INDUSTHIAL NUCLEAH COMPANY Projuct. No. 1454.5 i PAGM 12 1 4 y .,.,4

  • M*-

\\,4pnny.; ' tM ' N 's. O , 5 c. ~#3 'g,;j e;gy# 3 s 3 (N 8' W ?b poh (h,; ersicg.s M* J.: n-it ?g,. ,W;j;. g

eja

-s3 e f> ;;.Qy. x:nI m $49,&. .. A w<e

es a

w y,~ ,n (O $p g n% J} 'y% I4 y' c$g, j,.c y 9.* a.t o.y,s.fg

G.flyg

+ r.w f < ,s.'

  • ,,,c',

r . ~, .t .'_.*_s ; e. y %p&:h L.p w

  • Aw a,

L l AFTKli ;30 Voor vitt;N VAu,. twy:;g' l l l i ( I ~ t &/+;f{[W;T(l, ' ' 9.... l ' A '99ySP.dl "} } ^ 'J M ?;Ot' .. g,11' 9. N,,. ;.,'\\ f f. y] A >? ,. j I .) ~ -lCe Mi!4-k - g tj.7,,u-lw. c..g lV-i . e, /pg.. c, i >Sq., i y-r,f . + >.. Jh.Op,/$ y' / G W 91 x, - 4.sl-- QL l 1 $$. A G;k hyG ,/ Q;,1;% g.: Q.; \\ yLkg ?$i

ik; j[k

'g I s y kh3% E f l,. \\ Q[., ', ',hnt,; o y% i j.#T'.-e gc: ' 6 Sw p I s A 4.- .a v w4 ? . i, .. fg - .S) W ) l+ Y ll, .) }. ~ n L-l x "v . y-. 1 w.. '.. r u. . >,2 g..i, g y AP'!UW INiblCATKS HAMAGRU AltKA lch;jj;,yf; lc

I Mr. E. W. Iluddluston, President l INDUSTHIAI, NUCIJAR COMPANY Maturlal u 1,aboratory No. M0103 PAGE 13 Projuct No. 14'243 i l l v i uams m e a m a i i .9 ast z.. )J i 'W--

  1. 7 l

i 7l~# *)' \\ j./ f, j

./. w qi l-

/ py,. L.*A .s 1 g* , 'R ) ' :w%,; c q. ~. r f???f.:.p ,, 1

i 4,

..Q 1 .+; p, h~? c i w 4 -g 't. i c R 7; y

)

' % 5 %t p' "., ~ t( )) W eenr:g Sc 5 )j .m.. m,, ,g,- PUNCTtiltX TEST F0ltTY (INCllES) Uttol* 1 i W]'EEhT MUMENT AYl' Hit IMi'ACT 1 lthTRST 1 l l I i t + -, -. - -. - - -..... _ _, _ -,. ~,., _,, _.. mm.

i Mt E W. tiuddluuton, latusadunt Ma t.u r i a l u 1.a t>u ra t.o ry No. M0103 l IllDUSTi(I AL t/UCLEAlt CUMPAfJY Project 14u. 14543 PAGE '4 1l s,... 7 , w' I .c.:.,:; [ 4

  • s: y y

.n o s .t m, j .vf/ - ( $ e n 8 3

.. l 1
.u s s

%T 4 t -a i

  • ' t e/

r - t ,e . 1 l ' v-4 . W,i 1 ,g ,9 y u A o a m goe e s I k AlTKit l' UNCI'UltX TMST AltitOW INihiCATNS IJAMAGNI) AllRA XXTEST

} l 1 A { hiala t s 1navartsc % iso. o thalilla t/af,ria h a."nt</utic ti Testing 1 ngineers, Inc. october 9' 1990 \\ I NDI)STH I At. NtJCI.1:AH CoMi*ANY Ma to s' i.i l es 1.alwa r.i t o r y No. Mul01 7 'e l '> W i l l i ainn S t. t oo t. I't o lec t No. 14 '> 4 4 Sati 1.oa rn t i o, CA 94*i77 j At.Lolit ioli s Mr. K. W. Iludd I oni oli, P oilidonal lita b ]oc t. 'l.*on t. I ng o [ l f ylu til. r i.: 1 Ninj lna f 'il Modo 1 l.l(l 00 Catuora g Ty1>o _11. U!)A/!![S7/11[t.:L 00 r i a l_. # 4 0 0 % p,lemi! teal ere Iff/M/!N) L_. r. i Dtht Mr. liinidIonton: i Al ytH11 Iot)tiont, wo llaVo l)o n' t o f'Inod a il'on di'op tuHL a rid a l>tiliM L t4 L t f t o u t. on tho caino t a nuluni f.f.od on 10 / 2 t> / 90. To u t i e nj wa ri po r l o t tnod lin accoidanco w i t.h Nuc loa Hogu lat on y Conuninn ion 10 CFH Ch. 1 (l ,im 1 -90 lid i t i on ) W11. 7 3 ilypo t.init. I ca 1 ace i dorit. eolid i L i on n. l air i oinpo ra t.u t o t.h ro ta g holi t Lho tont was appi ox lin.it o f y 70"F. Tho The anib i on t. l !~" woight of t he calnora wan ')2. 4 potinda. Ton t lity wati wi tisonnoit by Mt U. W. Iludd l on t.o i. T K S'l*II m l_*llO GifDilllH H 4 1) lllHK DllOP _-q A itou diop of

1. h u caino s a Lht ottyh a di ut aitco of nino

-] nie t u t n (30 tt.) init o a tlat, onnontially unyioidtini, hottzuntal nu r l aco, utriking thu uurfaco in a,)onit tini l o r whi ch ina x iinuin dain.igo in expoetod. ?) l*llNCTilllK ] A t roo drop o f t.hu caino ra t h t ough a d i n t anco o f J (40 inchun) in a poultton for which ina x i nuun dainago in to ano t o i

expuetod, onto the uppor und of a

uo l i t,

vortical, cylindtleal inild utnel bar inou n tot t on an usinontla)ly unyiulding, ho r i zon t.a l nurlace.

The bar wan l 'i etu (uix inehon) i n diainotor, wi t h t he t.op heri zont.a 1 and i t n udqu roundod io a tadlun of not inoro t.han n i x nun (l/4 inchon) j and of a longth au t o cauno inaxiinuin dainago Lo t. ho catuo t a, W but not. lonn than 20 ent (uight inchon) long. Tho long axiu of t.ho bar was vo r t. l ca l. a r._) a W 6. u///v ~- h g] / L- /

  • $Yl g

ano ^+.sm.,sim...u o n o to,s o.,u u lemm., oen. eoonm oe _,0._ on.

l 1 Mr. H. W. Ilud d l un ton, l'ron i du n t. M4 Lorialu 14al>os a tory rio. M010:1 IlJDUMTHI A1, titIC1.EAlt COMl'AtJY Projuct. No. 14's4:1 18A Gl? 2 i lilllltJL,T!i 00ll0T Tl?HT !) 1101000 thu 30 foot drop t.out thu cainura wan wolgliud and photogrophod. Uninnyu nunLainod i s oin f.hu diop wan docunionted wi th photographn. 1,ock flux wan tirokon ofI and stuu rce won r;lulodgod and throws opprox lina t o l y 10 t out-L rom Unino t a. tion al.l.achod phol.otf raptus (Isasjent <l I. hen /). 2) fio pu nc t.ti ro Loti t was por f orniod, enmorn fallod.40 foot diop Lont.. HMTHHT l HiltlHTH I Al, titlCI,t<AH Col 4PANY ropn i rod t.hu I i l lot. wo ld a routul ( ho lock box of t.lio catuo ra. AL Mr. Iludd lonton ' a roqiion t. a nocond 1.un L wnn po r t o s inod uti tho enmora (Suria1 #400!i) attor t lio d t opo i r wnu inodo. Tho nocond Lon L wan condueLod un iin,1 t.ho namo t.on L i sig procodia t o. TonLing wan wit.notinod by Mt. M.W. lhidd l on t on. 1) llof oro Llue.10 f oot drop t ont., t he camera was woighod and p,iologre,,hed. o_ge n,,n, e i,,oe , r,. Loe d,ep _ documontud wi t.h photog raphn. Tho urucco d id not. buconns d i n l odgini. Hoo attachod photon (pagon U Lhi o 12). 2) Daiungo nutiln i nod from thu puncturo t.on t. in documontud wi t.h photog raphn. 'tQu nourcu did not liocomo dinlodgod. [ 800 att achod phot ographn (pngon 13 and 14). fj Ag 8 o[n YQ 8 ~ g )k \\ g mi sj}gpQ(jkk /)-3't1 k ' dhh3 n ,e I w- -ww- -.w .-w,w

Mr.-M. W. litidd les t on, Prou l.dunt Ha to r i a l u 1.a bo ra l.o ry No. M010:1 1NDUSTit1 Ab NUCI. Malt COMPANY l'A G M 3 Ptoluut No. 14 !)4 :( 11 yon havo any quont. ion cognrding t.hin report pleano contact

t. h o undornignod at. ',415 ) H :15-:114 2, Ext. 2 '/ 6.

Vory Lrnly yourn, TM ' NG,MN 11NMMHS, INC. rr <u( (Ui. au ci "L Dan 'datanabo Annialant MutallurginL DWigy Attachmontu ,WU y\\thl! NN9fjl;,~ lg3t,'t p /h QU U ItMViMWMD llY ['f.^- 'a ;

  • A

%g TESTING MNGINMMHS, INC. ry/4 ff.k de' ks.,o.a a ; i~.'c'. ~,j[':',!li n\\b ; N &,\\ #1I \\\\ \\ ;. f' ll i 1.'

Koyuur, P.M.

'N,,/ 4 f' ' < !) g ~,% ' ConnuILing Mot.a1lurgica1 (MT-156S) \\gp{L..gy$ '. ' ~ and Quailty Engincor (Qtl-2520) I act Ma rk lla n t l u t.a, TEST.ING MNGINMMHS, I NC. hv Bob Gatowood, TMSTING MNGINMMRS, INC. E Mark llumbort, SHYPORTil HilAW FAIRWMATilMH ' AND GMRAl.DSON Cht?lu Kavalarin, TMSTING MNGINRMild, INC. Iti 11 Keynor, P.M., TMSTING ENGlNMMitS, .INC. John B. Martin, USNRC Po t.o Palko, TMhTING MNGINMMHS, INC. E - E 'E 4 %)av.co a w aggags a s 9 ' 8

-Mr. M. W. Iludd l ou ton, li uoldent M a t u r i<si n 1.a l>o r nil.u s'y N o. H010:t t lHDUSTit l Al. NIJCI.I'.All COMl'ANY l's o jec t. No. 14S4.1 PAGl? 13 8 8 <,- - e - ef p!Oer;H&h3 .'g E J e f "7-j@ j E Nw:; 'NY' .(- \\1 :.., .{ }y g( ', W 9' .4 v } gr.... ... = y e 4 f, 4

g g a m,m a d
4 ww g

.a n = w.m;n &w. wwey f'&x e O j$w$g.4 y se g wms.. - !y NMi' N 9.N i vs ,a 4f.. ~ ).- y [:$&u m$C n aw l h, h ' y'- L 4 t pf;., 7 ' : _ /, g _N:' gy,

e...

't@ % - l h,,f Njj.;[.l', .Ll u ..s L g* @Q/, ;dh.k};..'x A m ig y I'# t e. .,....*)

g..

VNN/,N%$; Q ,\\ % 1d \\i. n%..',,n,, -. %; ;

f,+, ; <e a.. :9 3. At[

I'm f4~ ijn ??M256A r an%n.,:.' $b 0T t . n' a ...m {;).,,{ } u {g.'.i,{, (( pp;pp.D {: .... ;.j,., .l ' i w w,,j N N.? .k

  • l,%

~ E 'g $ $ h @; @jf.'g.&@ddh g mm omt n ( ( +(c{oto,. . u i a i 8 r Ua g. @sse 4 ' ' 'N r c- ---*.r - - * ~ e

l Mr. !?. W. Iluddien t on, l> ros i dent Maturinin 1.n bora t.o ry Ido. M010:1 1 NDilSTR I A1. NilC1.F.All COMl'ANY l> roJ oe L No, I 4 S4 :I ~ l'AGl? 14 ( y,.M:i ~ ~ m.a.; s ",c;l P: % :*.' s m s: t' + ': : 8 l, ?.. : , L.3 Li Mf ' C n, [.. ;.y,f; l ^ 3 ';*,j},.i .'L y:q';.: 4:c k4phhb?NWN?$f? ghh,'

t..,

pt; ' A e-

g 9.

g 9 9

  • [hk

,QM f, l.2q ' 1 -,3 0 4 E. p I s 1 l -- 1., AFTF:lt I*tlNLl'illti: TMN*l' Altlit)W INiblCATI.:N l>AAtAGI:Ib AltRA ItF:TI:ST .I -^' I' ll ( { }l, ('s t' q)m:.uads o i vi

.. = , o l>eceniber 03,1997 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Coniniission Transportation liranch Olli~e of Nuclear hlaterial Safety and Safeguards NhtSS Wasliington, D.C 20555 A1tenlion: !) avid 'likiinsk y Ro nn #0C7

Subject:

NRC llulletin 97 02 10 CliR l' art 71,73(c)(3)

Dear hlr. TAlinsky,

in response to NRC llullelin 97-02, telephone conversation of November 13,1997 (with Tom W. Cuthbertson), fax transniittal dated November 14,1997 (with attachnients), and telephone conveisation of December 02,1997 (with llill Iluddleston), industrial Nuclear Company sulunits the following: The doeinnentation sulunitted for the puncture assessment test for the IR 100 lisposure Device IUS A/9157/ll(U), the IR-50 Source Changer lUS A/9156/11(U) and Overpack tilS A/9185/ll(U)] (used for shipping the IR-50 Changer and IR-100 lisposine), sent with the faxed transmittal of November 14, 1997, and hete attached, meets the setpiitements of 10 Cl'R l'ait 71.73(c)(3). CerliOcation: We, Tom W. Cuthbertson (RSO) and llill lloddleston (l'aesident) of !ndustrial Nuclear Company, attest under ienalty of peijury, that the doeninents submined (as noted above) are genuine anil ie ate to the items in spiestion, to the best or om knowleilge. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, llopefully, our response has met wilii your appioval and will tesolve this matter, llowever, shouhl you have any (piestions or need s additional inlonnation or clasification, please contact the undersigned or Mr. Tenn W. Cuthbertson. Sineesely, lt llill lluddleston Tom W. Cuthbertson l' resident RSO linclosure ee: Tom W. Cuthbertson .. i 4,6 c 6 + n, ss a, t 5i 4 3Q1 0 5 C C 6(4- /M M77 cr2 Bil\\ \\9

g i ii W INDUSTRIAL NUCLE AA CO, itiC. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RENEWAL APPLICATION US A/9185/B(U) PROTECTIVE OVERPACK. OP-100 { December 29, 1997 (Exniration Date.lanuary 31. 1998) -[EdI'[.'/oUsida'sENI: I s _ - - - _ - - - -_}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20198C802&oldid=4101863"