SER Re Util 831105,840229 & 860404 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2, Post-Trip Review Data & Info Capabilities. Responses AcceptableML20197H226 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Byron ![Constellation icon.png](/w/images/b/be/Constellation_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
05/05/1986 |
---|
From: |
NRC |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20197F122 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8605190093 |
Download: ML20197H226 (10) |
|
Similar Documents at Byron |
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20207B6481999-05-25025 May 1999 SER Accepting Revised SGTR Analysis for Byron & Braidwood Stations.Revised Analysis Was Submitted to Support SG Replacement at Unit 1 of Each Station ML20205B5091999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Relief Requests 12R-24,Rev 0 & 12R-34,Rev 0, Related to Second 10-year Interval Inservice Insp for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20205C5101999-03-21021 March 1999 Revised Safety Evaluation Supporting Improved TS Amends Issued by NRC on 981222 to FOLs NPF-37,NPF-66,NPF-72 & NPF-77.Revised Pages Include Editorial Corrections ML20204G3831999-03-19019 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Second 10-yr Interval ISI Request for Relief 12R-11 ML20238F6551998-08-28028 August 1998 SE Authorizing Licensee Request for Relief NR-20,Rev 1 & NR-25,Rev 0 Re Relief from Examination Requirement of Applicable ASME BPV Code,Section XI for First ISI Interval Exams ML20217K7171998-04-20020 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Requests for Relief NR-22,NR-23 & NR-24 for First 10-yr Insp Interval ML20216F4921998-03-11011 March 1998 Correction to Safety Evaluation Re Revised SG Tube Rapture Analysis ML20212H1851998-03-0606 March 1998 SE Approving Temporary Use of Current Procedure for Containment Repair & Replacement Activities Instead of Requirements in Amended 10CFR50.55a Rule ML20199G2591998-01-28028 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Rept Accepting Revised SG Tube Rupture Analysis ML20199H0031998-01-21021 January 1998 SER Accepting Pressure Temp Limits Rept & Methodology for Relocation of Reactor Coolant Sys pressure-temp Limit Curves & Low Temp Overpressure Protection Sys Limits for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2 & Braidwood Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20199C1401998-01-16016 January 1998 SER Accepting Request to Integrate Reactor Vessel Weld Metal Surveillance Program for Byron,Units 1 & 2 & Braidwood,Units 1 & 2 Per 10CFR50 ML20199C1231998-01-13013 January 1998 Safety Evaluation Granting Second 10-yr Inservice Insp Program Plan Relief Request ML20198H3211997-12-0303 December 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Licensee Submittal of IPE for Plant, Units 1 & 2,in Response to GL 88-02, IPE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities ML20211L2151997-10-0303 October 1997 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Relief Request,Per 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) ML20217C1681997-09-22022 September 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Relief from ASME Code,Section Iii,Div 2 for Repair of Damaged Concrete Reinforcement Steel NUREG-1335, Staff Evaluation Rept Concluding That Licensee IPE Complete Wrt Info Requested by GL 88-20 & Associated Guidance, NUREG-13351997-08-28028 August 1997 Staff Evaluation Rept Concluding That Licensee IPE Complete Wrt Info Requested by GL 88-20 & Associated Guidance, NUREG-1335 ML20141L9321997-05-29029 May 1997 Safety Evaluation Accepting Use of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code,Section Ix,Code Cases 2142-1 & 2143-1 for Reactor Coolant Sys for Plants ML20134L7811996-11-18018 November 1996 Safety Evaluation Granting Listed Relief Requests,Per 10CFR50.55a(f)(6)(i) Based on Impracticalities in Design of Valves That Limit IST in Traditional Manner Using Position Indicating Lights ML20129F9101996-10-25025 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request to Apply LBB Analyses to Eliminate Large Primary Loop Pipe Rupture from Structural Design Basis for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20059E2871993-12-30030 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 57,57,45,45,93,77,152 & 140 to Licenses NPF-37,NPF-66,NPF-72,NPF-77,NPF-11,NPF-18, DPR-39 & DPR-48 Respectively ML20056D4921993-07-27027 July 1993 Safety Evaluation Re Fuel Reconstitution ML20127N1851993-01-25025 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Inservice Testing Program for Valves,Relief Request VR-4 ML20059L3371990-09-14014 September 1990 SER Granting Interim Relief for 1 Yr or Until Next Refueling Outage to Continue Current Testing Methods While Licensee Investigates Feasibility of Acceptable Alternatives ML20059L4581990-09-14014 September 1990 Sser Supporting Util Changes to Inservice Testing Program ML20058M0001990-08-0606 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Response to Station Blackout Rule.Staff Recommends That Licensee Reevaluate Areas of Concern Identified in SER ML20058L9961990-08-0606 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Denying Licensee Response to Station Blackout Rule.Staff Recommends That Licensee Reevaluate Areas of Concern Identified in SER ML20248D5911989-08-0707 August 1989 SER Accepting Util 881130,890411,27 & 0523 Submittals Re Seismic Qualification of Byron Deep Wells ML20244D8191989-06-13013 June 1989 SER Supporting Util ATWS Mitigating Sys Actuation Circuitry Designs ML20247B3281989-04-24024 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Re Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower Tests ML20244A7221989-04-11011 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Rev 1 to First 10-yr Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan Constitutes Basis for Compliance w/10CFR50.55a & Tech Spec 4.0.5.Response to Items 2.2.2 & 2.2.3 of Inel Technical Evaluation Rept Requested ML20236L2001987-10-30030 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 11 to Licenses NPF-37 & NPF-66,respectively & Amend 1 to License NPF-72 ML20237G8561987-08-10010 August 1987 SER on Util 870303 & 0522 Ltr Re Optpipe Computer Code Used in Snubber Reduction Program.Code Acceptable for Piping Dynamic Analysis Using Both Uniform & Independent Support Motion Response Spectrum ML20210R2061987-02-0606 February 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 850517,0802,0823,1211 & 860429 Submittals Re Environ Effects of High Energy Line Breaks in Auxiliary Steam or Steam Generator Blowdown Sys. Design of Blowdown Sys Acceptable ML20210T2571987-02-0606 February 1987 SER Re Util 850802 Submittal Describing Design Details of Steam Generator Blowdown & Auxiliary Steam Sys to Detect & Isolate High Energy Line Breaks.Sys Design Acceptable, However,Two Deviations from IEEE-STD-297 Criteria Apparent ML20209C3571987-01-23023 January 1987 SER Supporting Facility Design,Per Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.2, Reactor Trip Sys Reliability,On-Line Testing ML20214R5481986-11-26026 November 1986 Safety Evaluation Accepting Projected Values of Matl Properties for Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against PTS Events ML20215D7341986-10-0101 October 1986 Safety Evaluation Re Util 860623 Request That One Startup Test Be Modified & Five Startup Tests Be Eliminated.Mod to Rod Drop Measurement Test & Elimination of Certain Other Startup Tests Acceptable ML20214N7201986-09-0909 September 1986 Safety Evaluation Conditionally Supporting Rod Swap Technique & Util Nuclear Analysis Methods for Control Rod Worth Measurements ML20198H3271986-05-21021 May 1986 Sser Re Automatic Sys to Prevent Charging Pump Deadheading. Design Mod Acceptable.Ser Confirmatory Item 16 Considered Closed ML20197H2261986-05-0505 May 1986 SER Re Util 831105,840229 & 860404 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.2, Post-Trip Review Data & Info Capabilities. Responses Acceptable ML20203N5331986-04-28028 April 1986 SER Finding Util 831105 & 850806 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 Re Reactor Trip Sys Reliability Acceptable ML20154C3641986-02-25025 February 1986 Suppl to Safety Evaluation Supporting Results of Tests Conducted by Wyle Labs Contained in Test Rept 17769-01 to Justify Less Separation Between Class 1E & non-Class 1E Cables than Required by Reg Guide 1.75 ML20236A7851986-01-15015 January 1986 Safety Evaluation Providing Risk Perspective of Util May 1983 Proposal to Change Tech Specs Re Allowed Outage Times from 3 to 7 Days for Nine Safety Sys,Including Charging, Safety Injection & RHR Pumps & Emergency Diesel Generators ML20209J1091985-11-0505 November 1985 SER Supporting Licensee Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.3 & 3.2.3 Re post-maint Test Requirements That May Degrade Rather than Enhance Safety ML20138A8711985-10-0707 October 1985 Sser Supporting Util 850725 Proposed FSAR Change, Incorporating Nuclear Const Issues Group Rev 2 to Visual Weld Acceptance Criteria for Structural Welding at Nuclear Power Plants Into FSAR Table 3.8-2 & Section 3.10.3.2.2 ML20137S7241985-09-26026 September 1985 Safety Evaluation Supporting Licensee Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Items 3.1.1,3.1.2,3.2.1,3.2.2,4.1 & 4.5.1 Re post-maint Testing & Reactor Trip Sys Reliability ML20132B3691985-09-24024 September 1985 SER Granting Licensee 850831 Request to Defer Preservice Insp of Safety Injection Sys Class 2 Welds Until First Outage of at Least 10 Days Duration ML20129H9071985-07-11011 July 1985 SER Accepting 850605 Submittal Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.1 on post-trip Review Program & Procedures ML20127N9911985-05-15015 May 1985 SER Re Util 831105 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 1.1., Post-Trip Review. Program & Procedures Inadequate 1999-05-25
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217H5221999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Byron Station, Units 1 & 2.With ML20217P6351999-09-29029 September 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 6 to HI-982083, Licensing Rept for Spent Fuel Rack Installation at Byron & Braidwood Nuclear Stations ML20217A1691999-09-22022 September 1999 Part 21 Rept Re Engine Sys,Inc Controllers,Manufactured Between Dec 1997 & May 1999,that May Have Questionable Soldering Workmanship.Caused by Inadequate Personnel Training.Sent Rept to All Nuclear Customers ML20212B9261999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20210R3431999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1999 for Byron Station, Units 1 & 2.With ML20210E2251999-07-21021 July 1999 B1R09 ISI Summary Rept Spring 1999 Outage, 980309-990424 ML20209G1751999-07-0808 July 1999 SG Eddy Current Insp Rept,Cycle 9 Refueling Outage (B1R09) ML20207H7941999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 0 to WCAP-15180, Commonwealth Edison Co Byron,Unit 2 Surveillance Program Credibility Evaluation ML20207H8071999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 0 to WCAP-15178, Byron Unit 2 Heatup & Cooldowm Limit Curves for Normal Operations ML20207H7851999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 0 to WCAP-15183, Commonwealth Edison Co Byron,Unit 1 Surveillance Program Credibility Evaluation ML20207H7771999-06-30030 June 1999 Rev 0 to WCAP-15177, Evaluation of Pressurized Thermal Shock for Byron,Unit 2 ML20209H3711999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Byron Station, Units 1 & 2.With ML20207H7561999-06-28028 June 1999 Pressure Temp Limits Rept (Ptlr) ML20207H7621999-06-28028 June 1999 Pressure Temp Limits Rept (Ptlr) ML20195J8001999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20207B6481999-05-25025 May 1999 SER Accepting Revised SGTR Analysis for Byron & Braidwood Stations.Revised Analysis Was Submitted to Support SG Replacement at Unit 1 of Each Station ML20195B2591999-05-19019 May 1999 Rev 66a to CE-1-A,consisting of Proposed Changes to QAP for Dnps,Qcs,Znps,Lcs,Byron & Braidwood Stations ML20206R6991999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Byron Station Units 1 & 2.With ML20195C7961999-04-28028 April 1999 Rev 2 to NFM9800233, Byron Station Unit 2 COLR for Cycle 8A (BY2C8A) M980023, Rev 2 to NFM9800233, Byron Station Unit 2 COLR for Cycle 8A (BY2C8A)1999-04-28028 April 1999 Rev 2 to NFM9800233, Byron Station Unit 2 COLR for Cycle 8A (BY2C8A) ML20205P7001999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205B5091999-03-26026 March 1999 SER Accepting Relief Requests 12R-24,Rev 0 & 12R-34,Rev 0, Related to Second 10-year Interval Inservice Insp for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20205C5101999-03-21021 March 1999 Revised Safety Evaluation Supporting Improved TS Amends Issued by NRC on 981222 to FOLs NPF-37,NPF-66,NPF-72 & NPF-77.Revised Pages Include Editorial Corrections ML20204G3831999-03-19019 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Accepting Second 10-yr Interval ISI Request for Relief 12R-11 M990004, Rev 0 to NFM9900043, Byron Unit 1,Cycle 10 COLR in ITS Format W(Z) Function1999-03-17017 March 1999 Rev 0 to NFM9900043, Byron Unit 1,Cycle 10 COLR in ITS Format W(Z) Function ML20206A8831999-03-17017 March 1999 Rev 0 to NFM9900043, Byron Unit 1,Cycle 10 COLR in ITS Format W(Z) Function ML20207M9231999-03-12012 March 1999 Amended Part 21 Rept Re Cooper-Bessemer Ksv EDG Power Piston Failure.Total of 198 or More Pistons Have Been Measured at Seven Different Sites.All Potentially Defective Pistons Have Been Removed from Svc Based on Encl Results ML20204H9941999-03-0303 March 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 4 to HI-982083, Licensing Rept for Spent Fuel Rack Installation at Byron & Braidwood Nuclear Stations ML20204C7671999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20199G8271998-12-31031 December 1998 Rev 1 Comm Ed Byron Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 Cycle 9 Startup Rept ML20205M7061998-12-31031 December 1998 Unicom Corp 1998 Summary Annual Rept. with ML20202F6181998-12-31031 December 1998 Cycle 8 COLR in ITS Format & W(Z) Function ML20206B4001998-12-31031 December 1998 Annual & 30-Day Rept of ECCS Evaluation Model Changes & Errors for Byron & Braidwood Stations ML20199E6371998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Byron Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20202F6021998-12-31031 December 1998 Cycle 9 COLR in ITS Format & W(Z) Function ML20196K6731998-12-31031 December 1998 10CFR50.59 Summary Rept for 1998 ML20207H7731998-11-30030 November 1998 Rev 0 to WCAP-15125, Evaluation of Pressurized Thermal Shock for Byron,Unit 1 ML20207H8011998-11-30030 November 1998 Rev 0 to WCAP-15124, Byron Unit 1 Heatup & Cooldown Limit Curves for Normal Operation ML20198D1501998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Byron Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20196A4191998-11-19019 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting QA TR CE-1-A,Rev 66 Re Changes in Independent & Onsite Review Organization by Creating NSRB ML20195F8321998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Byron Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With 05000454/LER-1998-018, Corrected LER 98-018-00:on 980912,inoperable Unit 1 DG Was Noted.Caused by Low Lube Oil Pressure Condition.Immediately Entered Into Lcoar for AC Sources TS 3.8.1.1,Action a1998-10-0909 October 1998 Corrected LER 98-018-00:on 980912,inoperable Unit 1 DG Was Noted.Caused by Low Lube Oil Pressure Condition.Immediately Entered Into Lcoar for AC Sources TS 3.8.1.1,Action a ML20207H7671998-10-0505 October 1998 Rv Weld Chemistry & Initial Rt Ndt ML20154L5501998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Byron Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20197C9051998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Byron Nuclear Power Station,Units 1 & 2.With ML20151Z9651998-08-31031 August 1998 Revised MOR for Aug 1998 for Byron Nuclear Power Station. Rept Now Includes Page 9 Which Was Omitted from Previously Issued Rept ML20238F6551998-08-28028 August 1998 SE Authorizing Licensee Request for Relief NR-20,Rev 1 & NR-25,Rev 0 Re Relief from Examination Requirement of Applicable ASME BPV Code,Section XI for First ISI Interval Exams ML20237E2331998-08-21021 August 1998 Revised Pages of Section 20 of Rev 66 to CE-1-A, QA Topical Rept ML20237B3361998-08-14014 August 1998 B2R07 ISI Summary Rept,Spring 1998 Outage, 961005-980518 ML20237B4841998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Byron Nuclear Power Station Units 1 & 2 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
. _
e .
- ENCLOSURE 1 SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEM 1.2 - POST-TRIP REVIEW (DATA AND INFORMATION CAPABILITY)
BYRON STATION DOCKET NOS.: 50-454/455 I. INTRODUCTION On February 25, 1983, both of the scram circuit breakers at Unit 1 of the Salem Nuclear Power Plant (SNPP) failed to open upon an automatic reactor trip signal from the reactor protection system. This incident occurred during the plant start-up and th'e reactor was tripped manually by the operator about 30 seconds after the initiation of the automatic trip signal. The failure of the circuit breakers has been determined to be related to the sticking of the undervoltage trip attachment. On February 22, 1983, during start-up of SNPP, Unit 1, an automatic trip signal occurred as the result of steam generator low-low level. In this case, the reactor was tripped manually by the operator almost coincidentally with the automatic trip. Following these incidents, on February 28, 1983, the NRC Executive Director for Operations (ED01 directed the staff to investigate and report on the generic implications of these occurrences. The results of the staff's inquiry into these incidents are re-ported in NUREG-1000. " Generic Implications of ATWS Events at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant." As a result of this investigation, the Comission requested (by i
Generic Letter 83-28 dated July 8,1983) all licensees of operating reactors, applicants for an operating license, and holders of construction permits'to respond to certain generic concerns. These concerns are categorized into four areas: (1) Post-Trip Review, (2) Equipment Classification and Vendor Interface, (3) Post-Maintenance Testing, and (4) Reactor Trip System Reliability Improve-ments.
9605190093 860505 PDR ADOCK 05000454 P PDR N
- - ., -- - L .- - --
The first action item, Post-Trip Review, consists of Action Item 1.1, " Program Description and Procedure" and Action Item 1.2, " Data and Infonnation Capability." This safety evaluation report (SER) addresses Action Item 1.2 only.
II. REVIEW GUIDELINES The following review guidelines were developed after initial evaluation of the various utility responses to Item 1.2 of Generic Letter 83-28 and incorporate the best features of these submittals. As such, these review guidelines in effect represent a " good practices" approach to post-trip review. We have re-viewed the applicant's response to Item 1.2 against these guidelines:
i l
A. The equipment that provides the digital sequence of events (SOE) record 1
and the analog time history records of an unscheduled shutdown should l provide a reliable source of the necessary information to be used in the l post-trip review. Each plant variable which is necessary to determine the cause and progression of the events following a plant trip should be monitored by at least one recorder (such as a sequence-of-events recorder or a plant process computer) for digital parameters; and strip charts, a plant process computer or analog recorder for analog (time history).
i variables. Performance characteristics guidelines for SOE and time history recorders are as follows:
o Each sequence of events recorder should be capable of detecting and recording the sequence of events with a sufficient time discrimination capability to ensure that the time responses associated with each monitored safety-related system can be ascertained, and that a determination can be made as to whether the time response is within acceptable limits based on FSAR Chapter 15 Accident Analyses. The recommended guidelines for the SOE time discrimination is approximately 100 milliseconds. If current SOE recorders do not have this time discrimination capability the licensee should show that the current time discrimination capability is sufficient for an adequate reconstruction of the course of the reactor trip and post-trip events. As a minimum this should include the ability to adequately reconstruct the transient and accident scenarios presented in Chapter 15 of the plant FSAR.
o Each analog time history data recorder should have a sample interval small enough so that the incident can be accurately reconstructed following a reactor trip. As a minimum, the licensee should be able to reconstruct the course of the -
transient and accident sequences evaluated in the accident
analysis of Chapter 15 of the plant FSAR. The recommended guideline for the sample interval is 10 seconds. If the time history equipment does not meet this guideline, the licensee should show that the time history capability is sufficient to accurately reconstruct the transient and accident sequences presented in Chapter 15 of the FSAR. To support the post-trip analysis of the cause of the trip and the proper functinning of involved safety related equipment, each analog time history data recorder should be capable of updating and retaining information from approximately five minutes prior to the trip until at least ten minutes after the trip.
o All equipment used to record sequence of events and time history infonnation should be powered from a reliable and non-interruptible power source. The power source used need not be Class 1E.
3 B. The sequence of events and time history recording equipment should monitor sufficient digital and analog parameters, respectively, to assure that the course of the reactor trip and post-trip events can be reconstructed. The parameters monitored should provide sufficient ,
information to determine the root cause of the unscheduled shutdown, the progression of the reactor trip, and the response of the plant t
l l
parameters and protection and safety systems to the unscheduled shutdowns. Specifically, all input parameters associated with reactor trips, safety injections and other safety-related systems as well as output parameters sufficient to record the proper functioning of these systems should be recorded for use in the post-trip review. The para-meters deemed necessary, as a minimum, to perform a post-trip review that would determine if the plant remained within its safety limit design envelo'pe are presented in Table 1. They were selected on the basis of staff engineering judgment following a complete evaluation of utility submittals. If the licensee's SOE recorders and time history recorders do not monitor all of the parameters suggested in these tables the licen-see should show that the existing set of monitored parameters ure suffi-cient to establish that the plant remained with.in the design envelope for the accident conditions analyzed in Chapter 15 of the plant FSAR.
C. The information gathered by the sequence of events and time history recorders should be stored in a manner that will allow for data retrieval and analysis. The data may be retained in either hardcopy (e.g., com-puter printout, strip chart record), or in an accessible memory (e.g.,
magnetic disc or tape). This information should be presented in a read-able and meaningful format, taking into consideration good human factors practices such as those outlined in NUREG-0700.
D. Retention of data from all unscheduled shutdowns provides a valuable reference source for the determination of the acceptability of the plant vital parameter and equipnent response to subsequent unscheduled shutdowns. Information gathered during the post-trip review is to be retained for the life of the plant for post-trip review comparisons of subsequent events.
III. EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION By letters dated February 29, 1984 and April 4, 1986, Commonwealth Edison Company provided information regarding its post-trip review program data and information capabilities for Byron Station. We have evaluated the licensee's submittals against the review guidelines described in Section II. Deviations from the Guidelines of Section.II were discussed with representatives of the licensee by telephone on February 7,1986. A brief description of the licensee's responses and the staff's evaluation of the response against each of the review guidelines follows:
A. The licensee has described the performance characteristics of the equipment used to record the sequence of events and time history data needed for post-trip review. Based on our review of the ifcensee's ,
submittals and our telephone conversation, we find that the sequence of events recorder and time history recorder characteristics conform to the guidelines described in Section II A, and are acceptable.
I
B. The licensee has established and identified the parameters to be monitored and recorded for post-trip review. Based on our review, we find that the parameters selected by the licensee include all of those identified in Table 1 and conform to the guidelines described in Section II B and therefore are acceptable.
C. The licensee describ,ed the means for storage and retrieval of the information gathered by the sequence of events and time history recorders, and for the presentation of this information for post-trip review and analysis. Based on our review, we find that this information will be presented in a readable and meaningful format, and that the storage, retrieval and presentation conform to the guidelines of Section II C. .
D. The licensee's submittal of April 4,1986 indicates that the data and information used during post-trip reviews will be retained in an accessible manner for the life of the plant. Based on this information, we find that the licensee's program for data retention conforms to the guidelines of Section II D, and is acceptable.
y .-
Based on our review of the licensee's submittals and our telephone conversa-tion with the licensee, we conclude that the licensee's post-trip review data and information capabilities for Byron Station are acceptable.
m
' " - - - --n-r 4 -
w- , - ,c-c.e ,.- . 4 , .
,,.g,,,,, ,y,._ _ ,, ., ..___, ,. ,. , , , _ , ,, , ,
TABLE 1 PWR PARAMETER LIST SOE Time History Recorder Recorder Pa rameter/ Signal (1) x Reactor Trip (1) x Safety Injection x Containment Isolation (1) x ,
Turbine Trip x Control Rod Position (1) x x Neutron Flux, Power x x Containnent Pressure (2) Containment Radiation x Containnent Sump Level (1) x x Primary System Pressure (1)x x -
Primary System Temperature (1) x Pressurizer Level (1)x Reactor Coolant Pump Status
_ (1) x x Primary System Flow (3) Safety Inj.; Flow Pump / Valve Status x' MSIV Position x x Steam Generator Pressure (1) x x Steam Generator Level ,
(1) x x Feedwater Flow (1) x x Steam Flow O
, , , - - , - . , . - . . ..n. , - - - ,
I I
e SOE Time History Recorder . Recorder Parameter / Signal (3) Auxiliary Feedwater System: Flow, Pump / Valve Status x AC and DC System Status (Bus Voltage) !
- x Diesel Generator Status (Start /Stop, i
l_ On/Off) x PORV Position (1) Trip parameters (2) Parameter may be monitored by either an SOE or time history recorder.
(3) Acceptable recorder options are; (a) system flow recorded on an SOE recorder, (b) system flow recorded on a time history recorder, or (c) equipment status recorded on an SOE recorder.
,