ML20196L032

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Addl Info as Requested in NRC Re Violation Noted in Insp Rept 50-285/88-02
ML20196L032
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun 
Issue date: 07/01/1988
From: Morris K
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
Shared Package
ML20196L034 List:
References
LIC-88-551, NUDOCS 8807070205
Download: ML20196L032 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

7kk bb bhfb b bbh._b Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 402/536 4000 July 1, 1988 LIC-88-551 U. S. tiuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555

References:

1.

Docket No. 50-285 2.

Letter from NRC (L. J. Callan) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews) dated February 8, 1988 3.

Letter from OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (Document Control Desk) dated March 14, 1988 (LIC-88-160) 4.

Letter from NRC (L. J. Callan) to OPPD (R. L. Andrews) dated May 17, 1988 l

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

Supplement to Response to NRC Inspection Report 50-285/88-02 Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) received Reference 2, Notice of Violation, issued as a result of the subject inspection report.

This report identified one violation, relating to a failure to document the use of material as specified in the design. OPPD responded in Reference 3.

Attached please find additional information requested by Reference 4 and as discussed with Mr. Greg Pick of Region IV.

Submittal of this information by July 1, 1988 was confirmed in a conversation between Ms. D. Matthews cf my staff and Mr. Pick.

It is believed that the attached information will address these questions.

If you have any further questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely, n

MS

/

1'Mh'.

co n K.

lorris U

Division Manager l

y Nuclear Operations rao R@

KJM/me O

ocr cc: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

@@e R. D. Martin, NRC Regional Administrator

@# k P. D. Milano, NRC Project Manager j

l P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector i

l Y.1 P I s'!!1dlP

i ATTACHMENT Ouestion:

Provide an explanation of and copies of the GSE and Station procedures utilized by 0 PPD to control documentation of the actual materials used during installation of modifications which are controlled by Standing Order G-21, "Station Modification Control."

QEED Resoonse:

The procurement process for materials and equipment is governed by Quality Assurance Plan Section 4.1.

Specific requirements for Engineering are identified in GSE procedures:

A-5 Procurement of Material and Labor B-5 Control of Material on Equipment B-7 Evaluation of Bids Additional guidance is provided in GSE Cuideline GEG-2 which provides a stand-ardized format for preparing equipment procurement specifications.

Section 5.4.3.4 of GEG-3 requires the design engineer to evaluate the materials being used in the modification and to consider protective coatings in the design process. Additionally, Section 11.1 of GEG-3 requires that the design engineer provide a material list for each modification.

GSE Guideline GEG-3 "Preparation of Design Packages", now provides a new format for Fort Calhoun Station design packages.

Section 5.4.3.4 of GEG-3 states, in part, that the design engineer must consider protective coatings in the_ design process. Civil Technical Standard CTS-3, "Painting Standard for Selecting, Specifying, Applying, and Inspecting Paint and Coatings," has also been issued.

This standard provides guidance to the design engineer when specifying protec-tive coau ngs is a part of a design package.

Plant Standing Order G-21, Form H, page 3 of 4, requires that parts and equip-l ment be procured in accordance with the purchasing manual. There is a requirement that purchase orders for materials be listed. Also, plant maintenance procedure MP-PAINT-1, Section 4.1 requires that the necessary painting materials and equipment be obtained.

l The installation procedure for MR-FC-84-162, Section 7.0 Materials, had a place for applicable purchase orders and/or stores numbers to be listed, but did not specifically say to list them.

The root cause of violation 8802-01 (NRC Inspection Report 50-285/8802-01) was failure to follow procedares which caused sufficient detail to not be provided in the design package or installation procedures.

Craft personnel were therefore not provided with specific direction on the exact type of paint to To help prevent further violations and provide additienal clarification use.

on exactly what is required, OPPD will add a clarification statement in Fort Calhoun Standing Order G-21 to require detailed purchase order / stores number listings for everything, including paint material, by September 1, 1988.

me