ML20195G404
| ML20195G404 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 09/11/1987 |
| From: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20195G199 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-322 NUDOCS 8709170360 | |
| Download: ML20195G404 (7) | |
Text
'
. September 11, 1987 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations James G. Keppler, Director FRON:
Office of Special Projects SCHEDULE FOR CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS 508 JECT:
In response to your memcrandum dated September 8,1987, we have enclosed a The schedule for the Category 1 CPRRG recorerendations assigned to OSP.
I schedules are provided fo. principal subject areas, with each of theThese schedule associated reconinendations listed thereaf ter.
based on our current projection for related technical review and activities.
changes in these plans.
. '\\./ oriqinal signed by C. 1. Gri.es m
James G. Keppler, Director j
Office of Special Projects
Enclosure:
CPRRG Recocrandations for Comanche Peak i
cc w/ enclosure:
T. Rehm C. Grimes P. McKee J. Lyons R. Warnick DISTRIBUTION:
NNb.'
y,, b{bsh bl.M Docket Files (50-445/446)
( m atAt CPPO Reading (87 128)
OSP Reading
';#'d N'^ W ~45 7 l JKeppler/JAxelrad
/f /atto -
BTompkins (87 128)
AVietti-Cook Malloy CPPO.LA 1
Ar x
x
\\
I7MDf36 3[ )
0IR:05P
..........Cy(.:.0/0 !R :05 f;Q., :.........qe.:......................t
- DIR:CPPD OFC N:D/; I O J 7 l
u.
- ClGrimes: sam :JAAxelrad g :JGKepplero g :
...... :.{. m
..:..............:..........v...:..........L...:..............:.
NAME
- P l
l OATE
- 9/10/J'
- 9/c/87
- 9/11/87
- 9/it/87 y
[N l
UNITeJ 8TATES
\\,
NUCLEAR REQULATORY COMMISSION
/
W ASHileeTON. O. C. 20305 I
g I
September 11, 1987 g'
MEMOR.uCUM FOR:
Victor Stello, Jr.
Executive Director for Operations FRON:
James G. Keppler, Director Office of Special Projects
SUBJECT:
SCliEDULE FOR CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS In response to your remorandum dated September 8,1987, we have enclosed a The schedule for the Category ! CPRRG recomendations assigned to OSP.
schedules are provided for principal subject areas, with each of the These schedules are estimated associated recoeurendations listed thereaf ter.
based on our current projection for related technical review and inspection We will keep you informed, particularly if there are substantial ~
activities.
changes in these plans.
w - -
James G. Ke 1er, Otractor Office of Special Projects
Enclosure:
CPRRG Recomendations for Comanche' Peak cc w/ enclosure:
T. Rehe C. Grimes P. McKee J. Lyons R. Warnick l
4 1
ENCLOSURE CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS
~
t FOR COMANCHE PEAK ESTIMATED COMPLET!0N CATE
$3SEf I
December 1987 CONSTRUCTION QA ISSUES 10#
ACTION Verify that an adequate quality 23 control procedure exists for QA inspectors to witness the trans-fer of marking for material that would otherwise lose its trace-ability when cut 4"to smaller sections.
Review NE0 procedures for adequacy 24 of records system.
Review NE3 procedures for adequecy 25 of ANSI N45.2.9 requirements.
Review NEO procedures for adequacy 26 of records shiprents to contractors.
Review NEO procedures for adequacy 27 of records shipping containers.
Review NEO procedures for adequacy 28 of backup records.
Review NEO procedures for adequacy 29 of records shipment accounting, Review NEO procedures for adequacy 30 of records shipments to contractors.
t Review NEO procedures for adequacy l
3' of backup records.
Review NEO procedures for adequacy l
32 of records shipeent accounting.
Review NE0 procedures for adequacy 33 of records storage.
Review hE0 procedures for adequacy 34 of records filing.
s t.
ESTIMATED d'
CCMPl.ETION DATE GROUP CONSTRUCTION QA ISSUES (continued) 10#
ACTION Monitor applicants' response to 47 staff concerns raised in SSER 11 regarding their audit program, particularly with respect to RPV surveillance.
Review Operations Traveler criteria, i
59 control and effectiveness.
l Verify adequate material identi-l 63 fication and traceability program for earlier work or review procure-ment and control program for the bulk piping stock at CPSES.
Cetermine if the Regulatory Guide 66 1.97 QA connitrents have been properly implemented at CPSES.
Review the adequacy of the j
67 l
licensee's program to update l
permanent installation documen-i tation when components are changed or replaced.
Emphastre safety significance in 69 all pertinent aspects of the j
licensee's QA Program.
i l
i l
i t
.----w-
3 ESTIMATED d*
COMPLETION DATE GROUP January 1988 CDR AND 50.55a REPORTING IDf ACTION Audit the CDR program to verify its 35 adequacy.
(Applicant should revise Procedure NEO CS 1.)
36 P.esolve conflicting TUEC procedures for 50.55e reporting.
Evaluation condition of TUEC 50.55e 37 (sles.
Evaluate TUEC for reporting 50.55e 38 t
corrective actions, Evaluation condition of TUEC 50.55e 39 files.
June 1988 01SPOSIT10N OF NRC BULLETINS 10f ACTION l
Provide applicant with clear and concise 40 written evaluation of actions taken to date and specify additional actions l
required to close IE8 79-14, I
Evaluate TUEC program for NRC Bulletin 41
., handling.
Evaluate TUEC procedures and process for 42 NRC Sulletins.
Eva1uate TUEC tracking and assignment for
^
43 l
NRC Bulletins.
.. Evaluate TUEC resolution of IES 79-14.
44 Inspect TUEC resolution of IES 79-14.
72 I
)
. w ESTIMATED
~
F COMPLETI0h DATE GROUP May 1988 COMPLET!ON OF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION IDf ACTION Inspections included in the 1986 inspection
$2 program, but not completed at Unit 1, should se reviewed, and those determined to be I
necessary to confirm plant quality, should be accomplished.
Inspections included in the 1986 inspection 73 program, but not completed at Unit 1, should be reviewed, and those determined to be necessary to confirm plant quality, should r
b6 accomplished.
November 1987 FIRE SEALS 10f ACTION 45 Verify adequacy of BISCO seal replacements.
Evaluation cualification and documentation 50 for BISCO seal replacements.
UNIT 2 RPV INSTALLATION January 1989 10f ACTION Perform a detailed review of iiestinghouse's TO engineering evaluation regarding translation of design criteria into installation speciff-cations, procedures and drawings and failure t
to control deviations regarding Unit 2.
i l
March 1988 SP0OL P!ECE COMPONENTS 107
.. ACTION If spool CVCS spool piece was not r.arked 51 at the time of inspection, then additional review woulo be warranted.
Resolve l
uncertainty associated with when the spool l
piece was starked.
[
Inspect other field-fabricated spool pieces.
62
EST! MATED
~
t COMPLET!0N DATE GROUP February 1988 NAMC0 SWITCHES (!ES79-28)
IDf ACTION Notify TUEC of recommended actions and 49 monitor resolution in EQ CAP.
December 1987 CONCRETE RECORDS ID#
ACTION Review statistical data regaroir.g 48 uniformity of concrete and review larger sample of concrete compression tests.
COMPLETE PROGRA)mATIC ISSUES IDi ACTION 02 Reinspection of hardware and design during current Comanche Peak re-review.
(Exp1' cit recommendations in sequence number 22 through 50.)
Establish clear lines of responsibility 18 between the Comanche Peak augmented inspection program and the established Itcensing, and inspection and enforcement processes.
" The status of the inspectinn programs for 53 Unit 2 should be monitored with respect to all hRC inspection activities to assure that inspections keep pace with construction and "windows of opportunity" are not lost.
p
. - - _ - _. -