ML20195G202
| ML20195G202 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1987 |
| From: | Warnick R NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| To: | Charemagne Grimes NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20195G199 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-88-322 NUDOCS 8811230305 | |
| Download: ML20195G202 (7) | |
Text
. //A
/
UNITE 3 8TATES
! NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N ,
{ l w AswiwoToN, D. C. 2M64 ;
JAN -81967 :
\,*e.**/ '
MEMORANDUM FOR: C. I. Grimes, Director Comanche Peak Project Division Office of Special Projects FROM: R. F. Warnick, Assistant Director for Inspection Program Comanche Peak Project Division Office of Special Projects
SUBJECT:
STATUS OF FOLIIJW UP AND CLOSE OUT OF CPRRG q RECOMMENDATIONa l 3
[
This is the first of what will be periodic (initially monthly) ,
reports of the status of our follow up and close out of CFRRG l recommendations. Eaclosure 1 contains the status of recommenda- :
ti.no due, based en the original estimated completion date, i Enclosure 2 lists the CPRRG recommendations not yet due. My ;
lateness in clearly identifying the inspector wit; lead inspection !
t responsibility is the primary reason for our not completing more of ,
the items due in December. Other higher priority work and annual !
leave over the Christmas holidays also impacted our ability to do i more. We hope to do better in January.
Let me know if there are any questions. :
i Wh j
R. F. Warnick, Assistant Director ,
i for Inspection Programs Comanche Peak Project Division !
Office of Special Projects
Enclosures:
- 1. Status of CPRRG recommendations that are due.
- 2. CPRRG recommendations not yet due.
i ec w/onclosuress i
- PMcKee l CWil)iams l l NRC site staff t i
l t 8811230305 001100 /
/
- CONDITBS-322 PDR j r
i !
Enclosure 1 CPP.RG RECOMMENDATIONS TAAT ARE DUE l
r Fire Protection Issues Estimated completion Lead
, 101 Inspector Acticn Date Status 45 Singh/ Verify adequacy of new November closed in IR Kelley Bisco seal installation. 1987 50-445/87-22 ,
See IR 50-445/85 15, 50-446/85-13, item 12.
50 Singh/ Reinspect Bisco fire seals November Closed in IR Kelley and certification docu- 1987 50-445/87-22 mentation. See IR 50-445/85-16, 50-446/87-13, item 12 & page 3-46.
Construction OA Issues 23 Williams verify that an adequate December This item is quality control procedure 1987 being ins-exists for QA inspectors to pected as l witness the tranofer of part of our onsite re-
' marking for material-that i would otherwise lose its view of all ,
I traceability when cut into open ASME [
l smaller sections, issues. Com- -
plation of l this item is expected in ;
March 1*88.
l 24 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Closed in IR i adequacy of records system. 1987 50-445/47-32 i 40-446/87-24 !
- r 25 'f ale Review NEO procedures for December Inspection (
i adequacy of ANSI N45.2.9 1987 started.
requirements. Scheduled f for comple- I 1
tion in Jan. ;
Review NEO procedures for December Inspection l 26 Hale adequacy of records ship- 1987 started. l ments to contractors. Scheduled '
for comple- i
{ tion in Jan. ,
l l
1
i' 2 .
CONSTRUCTION QA ISSUES Enclosure 1 Estimated Lead Completion .
101 Jnspector Action _,
Date Status 27 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Inspection adequacy of records ship- 1987 started.
ping containers. Scheduled '
for comple-tion in Jan.
28 He.le Review NEO procedures for December Same as adequacy of backup records. 1987 above.
29 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as adequacy of records ship- 1987 above. ,
4 monts accounting. ;
! 30 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as i adequacy of records ship- 1987 above.
monts to contractors.
31 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as adequacy of backup records. 1987 above. 1 c
32 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as ;
adequacy of records ship- 1987 above.
ment accounting. r 33 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as l adequacy of records 1987 above. !
's ,
storage.
34 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as l adequacy of records 1987 above. .
filing. ;
Monitor applicants' re- December closed in IR !
47 Hale '
sponse to staff concerns 1987 50-445/87-32 '
raised in SSER 11 regard- 50-446/87-24 ing their audit program,
< particularily with respect !
1 to RPV surveillance. ;
1 59 Phillips Revicw Operations Traveler December Scheduled j criteria, control and 1987 for January :
1 effectiveness. inspection. !
I l !>
(
3 construction OA Issues Enclosure 1 Estimated Lead completion !
101 Inspectog ACTION __ Date Status i t
63 Williams verify adequate material December This item is j identification and trace- 1987 being in- ;
1 ability program for earlier spected as t work or review procurement part of our F and control program for the onsite re- i bulk piping stock at CPSES. view of all [
open ASME issues. Com- 7 pletion is expected in March 1988. t j !
! 66 Kelley Determine if the Segula- December Scheduled !
tory Guide 1.97 OA commit- 1987 for January l
'. ments have been properly inspection.
, implemented at CPSES.
i
. 67 Kelley Review the adequacy of December Scheduled the licensee's program to 1987 for January l update permanent installa- inspection. -
tjon documentation when
. components are changed or -
replaced.
l 69 McKee Emphasize safety signifi- December ongoing.
cance in all pertinent 1987 I j aspects of the licensee's
) QA Program.
! Concrete Records I t 1 48 Lyons/ Review statistical data December Civil /struc- f Runyon regarding uniformity of 1987 tural con-concrete and review larger sultant re- l sample of concrete compres- signed in i
- sion tes,ts. Aug.'87. New i j NRC C/S in- l spector will r
!l be onsite i 1/19/84. In- !
spection i will begin :
after that. l i
i i i
?
I
i 4 . ,
s .
, l Enclosure 2 i CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS NOT YET DUE ,l CDR AND 50.55(e) REPORTING ,
l Estimatt( l' Lead Completagg igi Inspector ACTION ,, Date _ Status j 35 Phillips Audit the CDR program to January Inspection P.J.
verify its adequa:y. 1988 started in.1, !
(Applicant should revise December.
Procedure NEO CS-1.) i 36 Phillips Resolve conflicting TUEC January Same as :,/
procedures for 50.55e re- 1988 above. 4 i
porting. '
l 37 Phillips Evalua*,e retrievable con- January Same as .- 4 . /
dition of TUEC 50.55e files. 1988 above. c ..
38 Phillips Evaluate TUEC for report- January Same as ? . . .'
ing 50.55e corrective 1988 above. F : ( !
actions. .
39 Phillips Evaluate auditable condi- January Same as . ;
tion of TUEC 50.55e files. 1988 above. ,,
NA>KX) sWITHCES (IES 79-28) !
49 Phillips Notify TURC of recommended February i actions and monitor resolu- 1988 i tion in IQ CAP. L i
SPOOL PIECE COMPONE [
[
l 51 Williams If CVCS spool piece Ma r c !
was not marked at the time 19' - !
of inspection, then addi- r tional review would be warranted. Resolve uncer- .
tainty associated with when l the spool piece was marked. (
I 62 wi).11ams Inspect other field- March fabricated spool pieces. 1988 ( /
2 COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Enclosure 2 Estimated Lead ..
Completion ID1 Inspector Action Date Status 52 Livermore Inspections included in May 1988 the 1986 inspection pro-gram, but not completed at Unit 1, should be reviewed, and those determined to be necessary to confirm plant quality, should be accomp-lished.
73 Livermore Review the inspection pro- May 1988 gram for gaps caused by non-performance. Take appropriate action to close those gaps where there remains a clear benefit to plant quality.
DISPOSITION OF NRC BULLETINS 40 Lyons Provide applicant with June 1988 clear and concise written evaluation of actions taken to date and specify addi-tional actions required'to close IEB 79-14.
PMU:nr 41 MbW; > Evaluate TUEC program for June 1988 ,
NRC Bulletin handling.
42 kf Evaluate TUEC procedures June 1988 and process <..or NRC Bulle- t tina.
43 W e Evaluate TUEC tracking June 1988 i and assignment for NRC Bulletins.
44 Lyons Evaluate TUEC resolution June 1988 of IEB 79-14.
72 Lyons Inspect TUEC resolution June 1988 of IZB 79-14.
l
~ .
i 3
UNIT 2 RPV INSTALLATION Enclosure 2 Estimated Lead completion IDI Inspector Action Date Status 20 Lyons Perform a detailed review January of Westinghouse's engin- 1989 cering evaluation regarding translation of design cri-teria into installation specifications, procedures, and drawings and failure to control deviations regarding Unit 2, 21 Wiebe/ Perform a visual inspec- January Williams tion of the accessible 1989 reactor vesse; surroundings during or after hot func-tional test.
22 Lyons Perform a detailed review January of Westinghouse's engin- 1989 eering evaluaticn of the failure to maintain tolerance for RV support brackets and shoes.
46 Livormore Evaluate traveler and NCR January procedures with respect 1989 to the Unit 2 RV support brackets and shoes.
60 Livermore Verify the adequacy of January Level I QC inspection 1989 of RPV installation.
61 Livormore Review the completonoss of January QC coverage and tech- 1989 nical acceptability of the
- actual inspection criteria for the installation of all the major NSSS components.
e J
, _ _ - - - . - - , - _ . - . - - - . , - _ . ~ _ , _ , _ . -
a - , , , - - - - - . - _
/ o UNITED STATES P" o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHING T O N,0. C. 20555
{.' .i JAN - 81967
...../
MEMORANDUM FOR: C. I. Grimes, Director Comanche Peak Project Division Office of Special Projects FROM: R. F. Warnick, Assistant Director for Inspection Program Comanche Peak Project Division Office of Special Projects
SUBJECT:
STATUS OF FOLLOW UP AND CLOSE OUT OF CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS This is the first of what will be periodic (initially monthly) reports of the status of our follow up and close out of CPRFG recommendations. Enclosure 1 contains the status of recommenda-tions due, based on the original estimated completion date.
Enclosure 2 lists the CPRRG recommendations tot yet due. My lateness in clearly identifying the inspector with lead inspection responsibility is the primary reason for our not completing more of the items due in December. Other higher priority work and annual leave over the Christmas holidays also impacted our ability to do more. We hope to do better in Ja:1uary.
Let me know if there are any questions.
W WY 2
l R. F. Warnick, Assistant Director for Inspection Programs Comancho Peak Project Division Office of Special Projects G
Enclosures
- 1. Status of CPRRG recommendations that are due.
- 2. CPRRG recommendations not yet due.
cc w/onclosures: ,
s PMcKee CWilliams ;
NRC site staff ,,
I
\I& a l Csi
~
\ '
L. a., . - s - -
r)/
CT G.(. j l
. O )f
Enclosure 1 CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS THAT ARE DUE Fire Protection Issues Estimated Lead Completion Action Date Status ID# Inspector 45 Singh/ Verify adequacy of new November Closed in IR Kelley Bisco seal installa' tion. 1987 50-445/87-22 See IR 50-445/85-16, 50-446/85-13, item 12.
50 Singh/ Reinspect Bisco fire seals November Closed in IR Kelley and certification docu- 1987 50-445/87-22 mentation. See IR 50-445/85-16, 50-446/87-13, item 12 & page 3-46.
Construction OA Issues 23 Williams Verify that an adequate December This item is quality control procedure 1987 being ins-exists for QA inspectors to pected as witness the transfer of part of our marking for material that onsite re-would otherwise lose its view of all traceability when cut into open ASME smaller sections. issues. Com-pletion of this item is expected in March 1988.
24 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Closed in IR adequacy of records system. 1987 50-445/87-32 40-446/87-24 25 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Inspection adequacy of ANSI N45.2.9 1987 started, requirements. Scheduled for comple-tion in Jan.
Hale Review NEO procedures for December Inspection 26 adequacy of records ship- 1987 started.
ments to contractors. Scheduled for comple-tion in Jan.
_ . ~ . -
s; t'
- c -
2 CONSTPUCTION OA ISSUES Enclosure 1 Estimated completion Lead ,.
Inspector Action Date Status ID1 Review NEO procedures for December Inspection 27 Hale adequacy of records ship- 1987 started.
Scheduled ping containers.
for comple- ,
tion in Jan.
Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as 28 above.
adequacy of backup records. 1987 29 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as adequacy of records ship- 1987 above.
ments accounting.
30 Hale Review NEO procedures for December Same as adequacy of records ship- 1987 above.
ments to contractors.
Review NEO procedures for Decoraber Same as 31 Hale 1987 adequacy of backup records. above.
i Review NEO procedures for December Same as 32 Hale above.
' adequacy of records ship- 1987 ment accounting.
Review NEO procedures for December Same as 33 Hale 1987 abcVe.
adequacy of records storage.
Review NEO procedures for December Same as 34 Hale 1987 above.
adequacy of records filing.
Monitor applicants' re- December closed in IR 47 Hale 1987 50-445/87-32 sponse to staff concerns 50-446/87-24 raised in SSER 11 regard-ing their audit program, particularily with respect to RPV surveillance.
Phillips Review Operations Traveler December Scheduled 59 for January criteria, control and 1987 Inspection.
offectiveness.
3 Enclosure 1
- onstruction OA Issues
- Estimated Completion Lead Inspector ACTION Date Status ID #_ __
63 Williams verify adequate material December This item is identification and trace- 1987 being in- ,
ability program for earlier spected as i work or review procurement part of our and control program for the onsite re-bulk piping stock at CPSES. view of all
- open ASME issues. Com-pletion is expected in March 1988.
65 Kelley Determine if the Regula- December Scheduled tory Guide 1.97 QA commit- 1987 for January ments have been properly inspection.
implemented at CPSES.
67 Kelley Keview the adequacy of December Scheduled the licensee's program to 1987 for January update permanent installa- inspection.
tion documentation when components are changed or replaced.
McKee Emphasize safety signifi- December Ongoing.
69 cance in all pertinent 1987 aspects of the licensco's QA Program. ,
- Concrete Records 48 Lyons/ Review statistical data December Civil /struc-Runyon regarding uniformity of 1987 tural con-sultant re-concrete and review larger sample of concrete compres- signed in '
Aug.'87. New sion tests.
NRC C/S in-spector will
' be onsite 1/19/88. In- I spection -
will begin after that. -
,i W
Enclosure 2
~
CPRRG RECOMMENDATIONS NOT YET'DUE CDR AND 50.55(e) REPORTING Estimated Lead Completion ID4 Inspector ACTION Date Status
, 35 Phillips Audit the CDR program to January Inspection verify its adequacy. 1988 started in ;
(Applicant should revise December. '
Procedure NEO CS-1.) ,
36 Phillips Resolve conflicting TUEC January Same as procedures for 50.55e re- 1988 above.
- porting.
37 Phillips Evaluate retrievable con- January Same as dition of TUEC 50.55e files. 1988 above.
38 Phillips Evaluate TUEC for report- January Same as ing 50.55e corrective 1988 above. .
l actions.
I 39 Phillips Evaluate auditable condi- January Same as tion of TUEC 50.550 files. 1988 above.
. NAMCO SWITHCES (IEB 79-28) ;
i 49 Phillips Notify TUEC of recommended February actions and monitor resolu- 1988 i tion in EQ CAP.
SPOOL PIECE COMPONENTS i
51 Williams If CVCS spool picco March
- was not marked at the time 1988 1
of inspection, than addi- ,
tional revicw would bo i warranted. Resolvo uncer-tainty associated with when i the spool piece was marked.
G2 Williams Inspect other field- March I 1988 fabricated spool pieces. j i
i
. 2 OMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Enclosure 2 Estimated Completion !
Lead Inspector Action Date Status IDt ,
52 Livermore Inspections included in May 1988 l the 1986 inspection pro- !
gram, but not completed at :
Unit 1, should be reviewed, and those determined to be .
necessary to confirm plant :
quality, should be 'accomp- [
lished.
't 73 Livermore Review the inspection pro- May 1988 .
gram for gaps caused by non- l t
performance. Take appropriate action to close those gaps ;
where there remains a clear benefit to plant quality. .
DISPOSITION OF NRC BULLETINS 3 40 Lyons provide applicant with June 1988 clear and co.'cise written [
! evaluation of actions taken t to date and specify addi-
- 4 tional actions required to close IEB 79-14. .
June 1988 41 Wiebe Evaluate TUEC program for NRC Bulletin handling.
.i 42 Wiebe Evaluate TUEC procedures June 1988 !
and process for NRC Bulle-tins. [
, 43 Wiebe Evaluato TUEC tracking June 1988 i
J and assignment for NRC Bulletins.
t 44 Lyons Evaluate TUEC resolution June 1988 l 1 of IEB 79-14.
72 Lyons Inspect TUEC resolution June 1988 }
' of IEB 79-14.
J I
r i l i
. 3 l'
UNIT 2 RPV INSTALLATION Enclosure 2 Estimated Lead Completion Inspector Action Date Status ID1 20 Lyons Perform a detailed review January of Westinghouse's engin- 1989 eering evaluation reaarding translation of design cri-i teria into installation specifications, procedures, and drawings and failure to control deviations regarding
.. Unit 2.
21 Wiebe/ Perform a visual inspec- January Williams tion of the accessible 1989 reactor vessel surroundings during or after hot func-tional test.
22 Lyons Perform a detailed review January of Westinghouse's engin- 1989 cering evaluation of the failure to maintain l tolerance for RV support i brackets and shoes.
46 Livermore Evaluate traveler and NCR January procedures with respect 1989 to the Unit 2 RV support ,
brackets and shoes.
60 Livermore Verify the adequacy of January i
Level I QC inspection 1989 of RPV installation.
61 Livermore Review the completonoss of January I' QC coverage and tech- 1989 i
nical acceptability of the actual inspection criteria '
for the installation of all the major NSSS components.
1
)
I i
,