ML20155C196
| ML20155C196 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 09/23/1980 |
| From: | Harold Denton NRC |
| To: | Cunningham G NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150F521 | List:
|
| References | |
| FRN-45FR20491, RULE-PR-2, RULE-PR-50 AA61-2-156, NUDOCS 8604160481 | |
| Download: ML20155C196 (7) | |
Text
Ell +
PDE
[
UNITED STATES j,
8^
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
, '. r, W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
~*
yDn NOTE T0: Guy Cunningham FROM:
Harold R. Denton
SUBJECT:
TEMPORARY OPERATING LICENSING AUTHORITY AND THE "SHOLLY AMENDMENT" This is in response to your August 16 request for coments on the subject rule changes. addresses the NRR resource impact associated with the various regulatory changes. contains our coments on the proposed changes.
Harold R. Denton
Enclosures:
As stated J-
. p r'
((
f>P Wa:bA g /[,g[,,,
l~2b:p
$DS $04G1 eso327 2 ASFppg4,1 PDR
I
\\
Resource Estimates 1.
Proposed rule re: temporary operating license authority.
As we understand it, the temporary operating license (TOL) option is:
a.
Available only for cases in which there is a public hearing.
b.
Available only until December 1983.
c.
Available only in cases where the hearing process is delaying operating authority for a plant that is otherwise licensable.
d.
Available only after staff issuance of the ACRS SSER, the FES, and the filing of an emergency preparedness plan.
With these constraints and based on the latest Bevill schedule, it appears that the following plants might have the opportunity (or need) to petition for a TOL:
Shoreham 1, Midland 2, and Byron 1.
Assuming all three petition for two temporary licenses (5% and 50%), and that each action requires about 1 man-month, the total resource impact of this rule will be about 0.5 PMY.
2.
Final Rule on Standards for no significant hazards consideration -
No resource impact.
3.
Proposed rule - Criteria for Notice and Public Comment -
a.
Monthly FR notice: 2 man-weeks / notice, or about 0.5 PMY per year.
b.
Notice of " proposed action": no additional resources.
c.
Post-notice: no additional resources.
d.
Notice to States:
one man-week / amendment; three amendments per license per year; equals 76 x 3 = 228 man-weeks / year, or about 4.4 PMY per year.
s m
i 4
Comments 1.
emporary Operating License a.
The legislation (and, accordingly, the proposed rule) is unclear regarding one of the prerequisite filings that are required before submitung an initial petition - i.e., item (4) which calls for filing of "a State, local, or utility emergency preparedness plan for the facility." As drafted, a licensee would only have to file a utility plan -- and it would not necessarily have to be acceptable.
The proposed rule should strengthen this requirement.
t.
On page 9 of Enclosure 2, it states that the Commission can approve
\\
higher power levels (i.e., above 5%) if it " determines that such action is necessary." The legislation does not require this finding.
2.
Standards re: no significant hazards consideration a.
Page 12 Enclosure 3: The rationale for rejecting the comment that suggested a threshold level for the second criterion is not clear.
I ( p -r
=
The coment should be reconsidered.
(
b.
Page 24, line 4 - change "imediate" to "immediately."
3.
Criteria for rotice and public comment (Enclosure 4) a.
Requiring licensees to provide their analyses regarding "significant hazards consideration" is a new requirement that requires CRGR review.
f
_b.
Page 12: reference to 52.104(a) should be 52.104(e).
c.
Page 14, para 3: delete "af ter consideration of public coments";
we should retain flexibility to prenotice without waiting for tFe close of the coment period.
d.
Page 15, para. (b)(1)..Orquiring licensees to notify states of all l
amendment requests is a
- requirement that should receive CRGR review.
e.
Page 16, para. (2) - the phrase " attaching its evaluation" implies a i
separate paper.- The evaluation referred to is already in the FR notice. Delete the phrase.
f.
Page 16, para (5) - Requires staff to send copy of all issued amendments to the state. This is not required in the legislation and should be deleted. The phrase "as prescribed in 52.104" is misleading.
nd. ud 6% 1& "Y4 -
Q Wa&s w
v
), g Q n.ssaw g r.p.,Ai d'
[7590-01) t n,.,; A 2 /g h x~*
p,7.-l g lu 6 : / w r 5 % r' ~ q l w ~-
y S Mlo reAf~3 I % W M. lb 0
Y l
1 y
N'C~) A "
/4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION And Q Q~2 A u~<~ p...
m W - i s y s. a.
~
10 CFR Parts 2 and 50
- f. M 9)/.
eg 'ag/jpg -
Temporary Operating Licenses j
p.r'i
, d> >
)
^
e AGENCY:
Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC).
,h
,f M 7
\\ x + $,[ wQ xbN ACTION:
Final rule.
s
SUMMARY
- The Cor:nission has adopted amendments to its " Rules of Practice for Domestic Licensing Proceedings" in 10 C.F.R. Part 2 and to its regulations in 10 C.F.R. Part 50, " Domestic Liegnsing of Production and oftefy b issa 1%~cova+ g qw/.L.y~
Utilization Facilities," to rpflecL th c..; _..i ;f +-
md:a Qf GkskJ X L)~/y n wi+M k& " ~ ?;A;;;r-y =u f
A !)
4,,
^
,_~ /< g limstii...hritfon
, 1982. Me-w wtherity-ra.:;d i
^
s section 192 of the Atomic Energy Act of 195 Q as amended (the authorize 4he-ftRC-to-issue-temperary eperating-licenses-for nuclear power plants: Section 192, initially added to the Act on June 2, 1972,x..,,,-/= g-authorized the At'omic Energy Comission$to isbe temporary operating N
w j
licenses for nuclear power reactors under certain prescribed circumstances. The authority under the original section 192 expired, however, on October 30, 1973. To the extent that the amended section 192 l
1s in substance the same as the original section, the implementing l
l regulations in the amendments to Parts 2 and 50 likewise are similar in l
substance to the now expired regulations which were published in 1972 to l
implement the section initially. The amendments to Parts 2 and 50 set l
f 1Y
^ f "% ' '" ' "'h )
- @ /,L
,3 nd
,. iv, n M;'
b* * ^
M 4.p h 0. [l -s/ d 4 LW -h ~
ui/
m n ~ fl'"~h"",'
i
./$ sal
- S
/c
%g.~
(
s /-4, a f.; c
,4
~.
~~
O8l3-%I81
%.v:: % A. Q A L, M &
oM%
)
A/A4 b
% Tsmeow cetatores W (So.S?
l CPd ')
osa 4 w s s w oa_.*An a
o A _ = ; t.a.) %c k 4 &= q j' w % t. y C P {
l ou %,do-u
- 9. p ys
-pa w
% p wve t a ~amg -
~#
m w.m.
vs M
AM.
Qu,
%w.
Ar p
i J A,p W - c' '
of:k w
t%.
ssu a wa.
e,. g y-4
%_gA a A
h
! (l%
.g m W r_ - Ag oA1 v% %
p $ ssca
_o sk w sp y
ok -Ua
'sc 3 - au m
4 y =A )
w..,,u.
on. v vu ni 4.csst
== o
- maj O %
p a
.J
.4 s
- 4. i.t e
g&
n-oA 6 % A%
M d b of a JLin Aq we+4 e c.,
c= h l
Gusmt q?
o t.
r o6a 0a n an.u_
w
~
a m.,.
-4 w
A A k-w a.6 / ~G n.@ b _ g % q OL w
/AL
. ;th A%se 4Xblo 7:
c4u 2-1 T
u.,.
h4 (. ; - - @ n h
O y,;,y Q.,%
g g c_j k,z m,9;rg _,2.g; 4 ;g,to
/
^%
ANA L. Ys 4.s
. 3: M A c.7 oF 7 no Posta N '*-
_c.o su na rsoN ptAu r p s.v s s-u ssur x mne r SAv Queur 3 ll ( & 2.
o 2.( e3 scoue S T l uc.: m A
4 40(R't.
o 3 l P.3 j /oML 4
$ 4sN<n
/
09/ex 12 le2.,
P*e'64 1.A s Asst 2.
+
osles o dW3 joout to47utpw4o 3 $
os l V3 OS lPJ
<t>o u t.
M C fo s 45 A
5 OY/e'n C*(les fo#d #t, u
Fme A.*-
o6tes isles it/out
.(C4LLAuv i
44/4 a IA(P3 N e t c.es, s (ComuAsorn %
osIts i2.Iv3 h' #""
Qso traa 3-o>lks solW.n Doverruss Pa us Usttos t
.t ogje2 is l p.s
,g. u s (v
B y cou l
oc/t.s i=/e>
o e u a r, rue tutry.s &4rt /
A celt.:
ce/&3
/
A 4 N r.
IPN >
L
~f.
09/kJ ozi& Y t heit.
t
'Pt tLWs I Itl Vb IA.lE.5 OboeTML WobF Ctt t1R I Ia,/g.5 oC'/W
'> 3*lk3 l Qsouuo I
e.a./e o y/4-y
> 12 / 62 l N O / Ct3 }"$'.C'
$/ YWE**
e' fg hM g y G sl u isi p s C w ie s.a r a s)
I 6
GUMMsernM o w>rn P/Lsssu-1 bPasso DAre
>=O a.
Aa/ay'sa,
& # c a -s m m Misar OAlc. Y s0Mw~r 7b 13 Lu 2.t's 7 O
Psat c 7+ cse.
/M.4Wrs Mue a M st AL Q *% PL s r2 a Oy 0x no 6 e o r / 1. / L.s SM LJ $ 7's c./3 L. s Y MU S
/s =
DAYE OS c
~
P "t,,ua a a 0fYowa 1 PS2 CD ut Ph C.s 6
T
/1/52 os /gy c u ou uo is t astrze
.