ML20154B011
| ML20154B011 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 02/13/1986 |
| From: | Watson R CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-416 HO-860233-(O), NUDOCS 8603040202 | |
| Download: ML20154B011 (3) | |
Text
,
Sne
~
Cp&L Carolina Power & Light Company
,, 'j ; L, 6 v r 6L
- SHEARON llARRIS NUCLEAR PROJECT P. O. Box 101 NO I 3 *Gt3 New Ilill, North Carolina 27562 File Number:
SilF/10-13510E Letter Number: HO-860233 (0)
Dr. J. Nelson Crace NRC-416 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest (Suite 2900)
Atlanta, Georgia 30323
Dear Dr. Grace:
l In reference to your letter of January 14, 1986, referring to RII: CFM/SPB 50-400/85-49-01, the attached is Carolina Power &
Light Company's reply to the violation identified in Enclosure 1.
If you shou'd have any questions concerning this matter please do not hesit '._ to contact me.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Yours very truly, R. A. Watson Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant RAW:cwj Attachment cc: Messrs. C. Maxsell (NRC-SilNPP)
B. C. Buckley (NRC) 8603040202 060213 PDR ADOCK 05000400 G
PDR d
Zeo t
~,
j Attachment to CP&L Letter of Response to NRC Report RII:
CFM/SPB 50-400/85-49-01 Reported Violation:
10.CFR 50.55(f) (1) requires CP&L to implement.the Quality t
Assurance program described or referenced in the Preliminary I
Safety Analysis Report. Section 1.8.5.3 of the CP&L PSAR (versus i
the Quality Assurance program as stated in the Notice of Violation) requires that measures be established to insure that drawings are in accordance with documented plant configuration.
Contrary to the above, drawings were not in accordance with the documented plant configuration in that on December 17, 1985,.the resident inspectors found the as-constructed condition of the i
reactor coolant system (RCS), described in EBASCO drawing CAR-i 2165-C-800, Rev. 11, did not show the connections for the reactor vessel level instrumentation system (RVLIS) piping. The RVLIS was installed using Field Change Request M-873 and Design Change
)j Notice 530-1199, neither of which referenced drawing CAR-2165-C-l 800 as requiring updating due to the RVLIS addition.
I This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II).
?
Denial or Admission and Reason for the Violation:
CP&L admits the violation. The cause was lack of identification in Field Change Request M-873 and Design Change Notice 530-1199 of the need to change the related RCS flow diagram.
Corrective Steps Taken and Results Achieved:
)
~
Subsequent to the inspector's observation, CP&L issued Revision 12 i
to the RCS flow diagram (2165-C-800) which incorporated Field Change Request P-4854 and Revision 2 of the RVLIS flow diagram 1
(2165-C-844). The revised RCS flow diagram shows the DVLIS cross j
connection.
1 l
0
= _.
B Corrective Steps Taken to Avoid Further Noncompliance:
1.
Performed a check of flow diagrams to ensure that i
diagram-to-diagram and/or system-to-system cross references were shown. The cross check was performed on both nuclear safety-related and nonsafety-related flow diagrams. On the nuclear _ safety-related systems (53 flow diagrams involved), no discrepencies were found.
Thus,~the condition observed by the inspector is considered an isolated occurrence.
2.
Reviewed and discussed with Design Leads at the January 7, 1986 Harris Plant. Engineering " Quality Circles" meeting the condition identified by the Inspector.
3.
Revised the Mechanical Drafting Room Manual to clarify the responsibilities of the checker.
a Date When Full Compliance was Achieved:
Full compliance was achieved on February 11, 1986.
1 l
I i
e
,p y
,-qy_,
p,
+
,,.y
---s4.