ML20151P767

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Radiocarbon Age of Probable Coseismic Buried Soil Layers from State of Wa, Presented at 880506-08 Meeting in Seattle,Wa
ML20151P767
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/06/1988
From: Amy Hull
CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, SANTA BARBARA, CA
To:
Shared Package
ML20151H012 List:
References
NUDOCS 8808100181
Download: ML20151P767 (1)


Text

7 RADIOCARBON AGE OF PROBABLE COSEISMIC BURIED SOIL LAYERS FROM WASHINGTON STATE ALAN G. HULL UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA Stratigrdphic and sedimentological data from exposures in coastal Washington have been interpreted to indicate that repetitive cycles of estuarine mud and thin organic horizons result from sudden burial of subaerial wetlands during Cascadia Subduction

ene earthquakes. Regional synchroneity of these buried soils is an important requirement to establish sudden burial.

91 radiocarbon dates from peat, twigs, cones, and roots have been measured from eight distinct organic layers. Each layer has from 3 to 27 dated samples taken from the uppermost part of up to 18 correlated exposures. Large radiocarbon age ranges from each lajer indicate that instrumental and calibration errors are small compared prevent to the variance in the population of sample ages and calculation of weighted mean ages. Assuming minimal correlation, mean ages forinstrumental, andobtained:

buried soils are calibration errors the following LAYJ.3 sAw tr a m N Act 1 27 g; g 2

263 +/-144 535 3

2 27 1730 +/- 90 180 4

1694 +/-185 810 8 2496 +/-117 5 10 382 6 2924 +/-234 720 7

COL /2 3187 +/-108 250 3 1027 +/-112 WTCH/1 7 260 1210 +/-256 900 Simple satistical analyses show that the population of radiocarbon ages two layers are significantly differentfor each layer has the same variance and all but Layers 2 and 3, (99.9% level) in mean age.

alone. and COL /2 and WTCH/1 cannot be separated by dating Radiocarbon dating does not directly support sudden burial of are valid. but does show that regional stratigraphic correlations scil layers, High standard errors reduce the accuracy of age determination for each layer and probably reflect range of organic materials preserved in the forest /wetlandthe natural age envirement.

8808100181 880615 .-

PDR ADOCK 05000344 P PDR_

,