ML20151A246

Notice of Violation from Insp on 880501-0604.Violation Noted:On 880517,surveillance Test Not Performed Which Required That Test Switch A71B-S56B Be Placed in Manual Position

ML20151A246
Person / Time
Site:	Brunswick
Issue date:	06/29/1988
From:	Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151A237	List: ML20151A234 ML20151A246 ML20151A251
References
50-324-88-18, 50-325-88-18, NUDOCS 8807190301
Download: ML20151A246 (1)

Text

,

ENCLOSURES 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Docket Nos. 50-325, 50-324 Brunswick 1 and 2 License Nos. DPR-71, DPR-62 During the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) insoection conducted on May 1 -

June 4,1988, violations of NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1988), the violation is listed below: I Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures be implemented for the applicable procedures recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, November 1972. Item H.2 of Appendix A requires procedures for Technical Specification surveillance testtng. Item I.5 of Appendix A requires general procedures for the control of modification {

work, l Contrary to the above, such a procedure was iot correctly implemented on May 17, 1988, in that, while performing Seccion 7.3.2 of surveillance test 1MST-PCIS38R, as required by step 40.39 cf Plant Modification 85-061-W, step 7.3.2.15 was not performed, which required that test switch A71B-S56B l be placed in the manual position.

This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I), applicable to Unit 1 .

only. I Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Carolina Power and Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of the .

letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, I including (for each violation): (1) admission or denial of the violation, (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted, (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (4) the corrective steps which will t be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance j will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to l extending the response time.

FOR THE NUCLEA U RY COMMISSION

/

J. Nelson Gr Regional A mi 'strater Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 29th day of June 1988 8807190301 880629 PDR ADOCK 05000324 O PDC y

__ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _