ML20150F160

Forwards Tech Specs Change Requests 40,41,43,44,45 & 48 for Amend to Apps a & B of License DPR-72,consisting of Changes to Administrative Controls,Emergency Feedwater Sys & Electrical Power Sys.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20150F160
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	05/23/1979
From:	Stewart W FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
3--3-E, 3-0-3-E, TAC-11948, TAC-11950, TAC-11951, NUDOCS 7905310298
Download: ML20150F160 (6)

Text

W //97)

.. n d'hf"Yfa

,&n#01iN4 ot R oa

%Q}.%Qol

% O$O'*o*

Goo 03 Florida Power C0 a 90 n a 1so N May 23, 1979 File: 3-0-3-e j i D /,Nd 5 Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation >

/

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

[2 bA* D pg f' j ,

G/-t- .*g&  ;( ~~

Dear Sir:

eo i,

)g ' lf rbh, b Enclosed are three (3) originals and forty (40) copies of echnical Specification Change Requests No. 40, 41, 43, 44, 45 and 48 requesting amendment to Appendices A and B of Operating License DPR- . As part of these requests, proposed replacement pages for Appendices A and B are l enclosed. R 1

Florida Power Corporation considers Change Requests No. 40 and 41 to be a Class II amendment per 10 CFR 170.22 as it involves issues that are pro i I

forma and administrative in nature and have no safety or environmental significance. This represents a licensing fee of one thousand two hundred l dollars ($1,200). i l

Change Requests No. 43 and 44 are each considered to be Class III l amendments per 10 CFR 170.22 as they involve a single enviromental, safety or other issue. These amendments are exempt f rom licensing fees because they result from a written Coc: mission request to clarify technical specifications (Footnote 2 to 10 CFR 170.22). The Commission's requests are referenced in ths respective Change Requests.

FPC considers Change Requests No. 45 and 48 to be Class III amendments per 10 CFR 170.22 as they involve single safety issues. The Requests represent a licensing fee of eight thousand dollars (S8,000). o 4 o.,q y

$, *O 9*

wser PD(L h?

% eg.f s g

-N hs

%v\

General Office 3201 Tw.uum. Sneet soum . P O Ben 14042. St Petersburg, oda 33733 e 613-866 5151

• g G Director Page 2 May 23, 1979 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Also enclosed is the total licensing fee, in the amount )f nine thousand two hundred dollars ($9,200) and a signed copy of Certifiwte of Service for Technical Specification Change Request No. 40, 41, ',3, 44, 45 and 48 to the Chief Executive of Citrus County, Florida.

Very truly yours, FLORIDA PCWER CORPORATION 5

W. P. Stewart Manager, Nuclear Operations WPSecihM05 D6 l

-l i

i:

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

l l

STATE OF FLORIDA l l

COUNTY OF PINELLAS W. P. Stewart states that he is the Manager, Nuclear Operations, of Florida Power Corporation; that he is authorized on the part of said company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission the information attached hereto; and that all such statements made and matters set forth therein are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

0 A. ?.%r k'. P.

uead Stewart Subscribed and sworn to bef ore me, a Notary Public in and for the State and County above named, this 23rd day of May,1979.

' /// ~ s kt '

Notarp Public /

Notary Public, State of Florida at Large, My Commi sion Expires: July 25, 1980 (CRPNotary 1 D12)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

IN THE MATTER OF )

) DOCKET No. 50-302 FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE l W. P. Stewart deposes and says that the following has been served on the Chief Executive of Citrus County, Florida by deposit in the United States mail, addressed as follows:

Chairman, Board of County Coc:missioners of Citrus County Citrus County Courthouse Inverness, Florida 32650 An original copy of Technical Specification C,.ange Rec,uests No. 40, 41, 43, 44, 45 and 48 requesting amendments to Appendices A and B of Operating License No. DPR-72.

• FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION 1 -

lh V.'P.

. m

' Stewart idol (

Manager, Nuclear Operations SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME THIS 23rd DAY OF MAY,1979.

I k

/

Notary Public l Notary Public State of Florida at Large My Commission expires: July 25, 1980 (NOTARIAL SEAL)

(Cert. Serv.D12)

Technical Specification Change Request No. 48 (Appendix A)

Replace page 3/4 8-3 with the attached, revised page 3/4 8-3.

Pmposed~ Change Add tiie words "for Unit 1 and >1.195 for Unit 2" to Page 3/4 8-3, Section 4.8.1.1.1.i.1.b and Section 4.8.1.1.1.c.2.b after the number 1.20.

Reason for Proposed Cnange The proposed cNnge will eliminate unnecessary charging by lowering the allowable spc.cific gravity of the battery while it is in "float oper-ation". The proposed change is being made with the battery manufacturer's concurrence.

Safety Analysis This proposed change will not impact on the safety analyses for Crystal River Unit 3. This proposal will not diminish the battery's ability to supply its designed loads.

3 gum) Y,#

0 gg d

\q m en d  !

f ,.

, V (V*'l ,,,vn' Y 0F l

. 'W l W

hjpeb^ ' '90 gb /#

l TSCRN48 (060)

c .. s=

ELECTRICAL POWER S,YS1 EMS SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

c. Demonstrated OPERABLE by determining that each battery supplying DC control power to the 230kv switchyard breakers is OPERABLE;

1. At least once per 7 days by verifying that: '

a) The electrolyte level of each pilot cell is between the  !

minimum and maximum level indication marks, j b) The pilot cell specific gravity, corrected to 77'F, and full electrolyte level is > 1.20 for Unit 1 and > 1.195 i for Unit 2.

c) The pilot cell voltage is > 2.15 volts, and d) The overall battery voltage is > 120 volts.

2. At least once per 92 days by verifying that: l a) The voltage of each connected cell is > 2.15 volts under f float charge and has not decreased more than 0.10 volts (

from the value observed during the baseline tests, and j b) The specific gravity, corrected to 77*F, and full  !

electrolyte level of each connected cell is )_1.20 for i Unit 1 and > 1.195 for Unit 2 and has not decreased more i than 0.01 from the value observed during the previous  !

tests, and  !

c) The electrolyte level of each connected cell is between  !

the minimum and maximum level indication marks. '

3. At least once per 18 months by verifying that:

a) The cells, cell plates and battery racks show no visual indication of physical damage or abnormal deterioration.

b) The cell-to-cell and terminal connections are clean, tight and coated with anti-corrosion materials, c) The battery charger will supply at least 95 amperes at 125 volts for at least 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.

CRYSTAL RIVER - UNIT 3 3/4 8-3 1P--'