ML20148F313
| ML20148F313 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 03/14/1988 |
| From: | Stohr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20148F316 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8803280123 | |
| Download: ML20148F313 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000413/1988003
Text
. .
,-
h
g i 4 008
Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414
, Dyke Power Company
MTTH: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President
Nuclear Production Department
-422 South Church Street
Charlotte, NC 28242
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
HRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-413/88-03 AND 50-414/88-03
This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by
W. M. Sartor on February 17-21, 1988.
The inspection included a review of
activities authorized for your Catawba facility.
At the conclusion of the
inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff
identified in the enclosed inspection report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report.
Within
these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures
'
and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of
activities in progress.
Within the scope of the inspection, no violations or deviations were
identified.
Your attention is directed to resolution of the exercise weaknesses identified
in Paragraphs 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 of the enclosed report. Although the licensee's
actions during the exercise were found to be adequate to protect the health and
safety of the public, sufficient concerns were identified to require early
demonstration of corrective actions in some areas. These areas and corrective
actions were discussed and agreed to via an oral commitment from licensee
j
representatives following the exit interview.
The corrective actions were
slightly modified on February 29, 1988, per a telephone conversation with
Mr. Sartor and Messrs. R. E. Harris and W. B. McRee of your organization. The
,
corrective actions are summarized in the Results paragraph of the enclosed
inspection report.
If your understanding of this comitment differs from the
i
report statements, please inform this office promptly.
Although early
corrective actions are required, it is recognized that your challenging
scenario for this exercise was highly effective in revealing problem areas.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2,
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
\\
8903280123 G80314
\\
DR
ADOCK 0500 4 3
trn
_
r- -
.
.
,
'
.,
Duke Power Company
2
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
Sincerely.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY
DOUG!.AS M. COR'M
J. Philip Stohr, Director
Division of Radiation Safety
and Safeguards
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
cc w/ encl:
J[W. Hcmpton, Station Manager
bec w/ enc 1:
tX< N. Jabbour, NRR
PC Resident Inspector
DRS Technical Assistant
Document Control Desk
State of South Carolina
SjtteofNorthCarolina
0. Heard, FEMA Region IV
[D(Matthews,EPB/NRR
Ril
RII
RII
RIl
9))
-'
WSartor
TDec er
DCollins
eebles
3//0/88
3/g(1/88
3/(d/88
////88