ML20148F313

Forwards Insp Repts 50-413/88-03 & 50-414/88-03 on 880217-21.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Corrective Actions Discussed & Agreed to Via Oral Commitment from Licensee Representatives

ML20148F313
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	03/14/1988
From:	Stohr J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Tucker H DUKE POWER CO.
Shared Package
ML20148F316	List: IR 05000413/1988003 ML20148F313
References
NUDOCS 8803280123
Download: ML20148F313 (2)

See also: IR 05000413/1988003

Text

.. ,-:

h

g i 4 008

Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414

License Nos. NPF-35, NPF-52

, Dyke Power Company

MTTH: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President

Nuclear Production Department

-422 South Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28242

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: HRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-413/88-03 AND 50-414/88-03

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by

W. M. Sartor on February 17-21, 1988. The inspection included a review of

activities authorized for your Catawba facility. At the conclusion of the

inspection, the findings were discussed with those members of your staff

identified in the enclosed inspection report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within

these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures '

and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of

activities in progress.

Within the scope of the inspection, no violations or deviations were

identified.

Your attention is directed to resolution of the exercise weaknesses identified

in Paragraphs 5, 8, 9, 10, 11 of the enclosed report. Although the licensee's

actions during the exercise were found to be adequate to protect the health and

safety of the public, sufficient concerns were identified to require early

demonstration of corrective actions in some areas. These areas and corrective

actions were discussed and agreed to via an oral commitment from licensee j

representatives following the exit interview. The corrective actions were

slightly modified on February 29, 1988, per a telephone conversation with

Mr. Sartor and Messrs. R. E. Harris and W. B. McRee of your organization. The ,

corrective actions are summarized in the Results paragraph of the enclosed I

inspection report. If your understanding of this comitment differs from the i

report statements, please inform this office promptly. Although early l

corrective actions are required, it is recognized that your challenging

scenario for this exercise was highly effective in revealing problem areas.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

8903280123 G80314 \\

DR ADOCK 0500 4 3  ;

trn

_

r- -

. .

,

'

.,

Duke Power Company 2

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely.

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

DOUG!.AS M. COR'M

J. Philip Stohr, Director

Division of Radiation Safety

and Safeguards

Enclosure:

Inspection Report

cc w/ encl:

J[W. Hcmpton, Station Manager

bec w/ enc 1:

tX< N. Jabbour, NRR

PC Resident Inspector

DRS Technical Assistant

Document Control Desk

State of South Carolina

SjtteofNorthCarolina

0. Heard, FEMA Region IV

[D(Matthews,EPB/NRR

Ril RII RII RIl

9))

WSartor TDec er DCollins

-'

eebles

3//0/88 3/g(1/88 3/(d/88 ////88